Sunday, January 26, 2025

Friday, January 26, 1725. Foundation of the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools.

Pope Benedict XIII issued the papal bull “In Apostolicae Dignitatis Solio recognizing the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools, the De La Salle Brothers, or "Christian Brothers".

This is one of two Catholic religions orders dedicated to the education of children commonly known as the "Christian Brothers", which frankly causes a great deal of confusion.  Both have an educational mission.  Both have operated all over the globe, making this even more confusing, although the other organization is particularly associated with Ireland.

Catholicism became particularly associated with education in North America.  This was in part because public schools in the United States were de facto protestant schools, as the United States is a protestant country.  Catholic schools in many regions of the country came to be very good, and as a result they often were the private school of choice for many people in urban settings, irrespective of their religion.  This is still the case in many places.

In certain regions, religious schools were the only option.  This was the case, for example, in Quebec, where all education was afforded privately up until the "Quiet Revolution".  It was and is the case in Ireland where the the early Irish republican government basically foisted education upon the Church.

My grandfather attended a Christian Brothers school as a very young man, given that he left school at age 13.  He did not like it.

Last edition:

Saturday, January 6, 1725. Peter the Great gets sick, again, and instructs Vitus Bearing.

Saturday, January 25, 2025

Best Posts of the Week of January 19, 2025. The Death of the United States as a great nation.

A monumental week, which will go down in history in which a free people formalized the inauguration one of the worst leaders imaginable, and passed from a great nation, into just another country.  Far from "Mak[ing] America Great Again", America was rendered embarrassing, pathetic, and dangerous to humanity.

There will be no coming back form this.

That the United States would not be a great nation forever does not surprise me.  I have, after all, a sense of history.  I just didn't expect to see such a dramatic end to its greatness in my own lifetime

Nor did I expect to see it go from great, to weird, such as happened to Reformation England.

Such a sad ending.

January 19, 1825. The reason that today is Tin Can Day.






Blog Mirror: Remarks of Cardinal Blase Cupich, archbishop of Chicago, regarding immigration at the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City


Remarks of Cardinal Blase Cupich, archbishop of Chicago, regarding immigration at the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City

EspaƱol | Polski

While we wish the new administration success in promoting the common good, the reports being circulated of planned mass deportations targeting the Chicago area are not only profoundly disturbing but also wound us deeply. We are proud of our legacy of immigration that continues in our day to renew the city we love. This is a moment to be honest about who we are. There is not a person in Chicago, save the Indigenous people, who has not benefited from this legacy.

The Catholic community stands with the people of Chicago in speaking out in defense of the rights of immigrants and asylum seekers. Similarly, if the reports are true, it should be known that we would oppose any plan that includes a mass deportation of U.S. citizens born of undocumented parents.  

Government has the responsibility to secure our borders and keep us safe. We support the legitimate efforts of law enforcement to protect the safety and security of our communities—criminality cannot be countenanced, when committed by immigrants or longtime citizens. But we also are committed to defending the rights of all people, and protecting their human dignity. As such, we vigorously support local and state legislation to protect the rights of immigrants in Illinois. In keeping with the Sensitive Locations policy, in effect since 2011, we would also oppose all efforts by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other government agencies to enter  places of worship for any enforcement activities. 

The choice is not simply between strict enforcement and open borders, as some commentators would have us believe. Speaking this year to ambassadors accredited to the Holy See, for example, Pope Francis spoke of the need to balance migration governance with regard for human rights and dignity. “We are quick to forget that we are dealing with people with faces and names.” The Holy Father has also been clear that “no one should be repatriated to a country where they could face severe human rights violations or even death.” This is not idle speculation. Millions of migrants flee their homelands for safer shores precisely because it is a life or death issue for them and their children.

For members of faith communities, the threatened mass deportations also leave us with the searing question “What is God telling us in this moment?” People of faith are called to speak for the rights of others and to remind society of its obligation to care for those in need.  If the indiscriminate mass deportation being reported were to be carried out,  this would be an affront to the dignity of all people and communities, and deny the legacy of what it means to be an American.










If Trump isn't demented, what is he?

I've consistently advocated the theory that Donald Trump has a rapidly progressing case of dementia, and I'll stand by it, even though I have no qualifications to maintain that at all.

But what if he isn't demented. How do you explain his behavior?

We'll take a look.



He's just stupid

This is a real possibility.

There's no real reason to believe that Trump is intelligent.  His success in business, which is often cited is pretty much based on his having inherited a vast amount of wealth.  As studies have shown, people who inherit a lot of money are likely remain wealthy no matter what.  It actually takes real effort for them to fall down into a lower economic class.

There's plenty of evidence that Trump is simply dumb.  He appears to say whatever floats through his head he adopts the views of people around him without thought, he asks questions of his aid that are really, well, dumb.

And really stupid people often tend to be either profoundly kind, or profoundly mean.  Trump seems to fit in to the latter category.  The nuances of morality that most people have require some degree of intelligence.  Trump simply lacks that, perhaps, so being really mean just comes naturally to him.

How then did he get to be President?

Well one thing is that people tend to assume that wealth equals smarts.  He has a lot of money, so he  must be smart, right?

Nope.

But as people tend to believe that, they tend also to fill in the blanks for the stupid person so that their support of him is rationalized.

In the past, we saw that a lot with sports.  Some sports figure may be as dumb as a box of rock, but as people want to idolize him, they make excuses for everything the person says or does.

And the entire celebrity worship thing in American culture is part of that.  People take seriously things celebrities say, as they must be smart, or they wouldn't be celebrities, right?

To add to it, the dumb int he public eye tend, normally to be protected by handlers, which Trump was up until very recently.  Now that he's not the stupidity of much of what he says and does is really coming to the forefront.

Finally, intelligence is complicated.  There are polymaths who are sort of universally intelligent, but there are also people who can excel at one thing without really being smart at anything else.  Trump clearly has skills as a salesman.  That frankly seems to be the only talent he has.

On that, I've known a few salesmen really well and often been surprised by how little interest they have in the topic of what they sell, or anything else.  An extremely successful real estate broker I know, for example surprised me when he revealed he had once been a car salesman.  They are, however, both sales.

A car salesman that I knew once surprised me in a conversation by revealing he really knew nothing about automobiles at all, and wasn't interested in them.  Cars bored him pretty clearly, but he was really good at selling them.  Selling is what interested him.

Trump may very well be like that.  He has good sales skills, which doesn't mean he's really very interested in anything he's selling.

A problem with the stupid is that they won't acknowledge it.  I don't think its true that most stupid people don't have an inkling they're dumb, but how they react to it is different.  Some simply accept it.  Others reject it.  Some seek constant affirmation that they aren't dumb.  Trump seems to fit into that category.

Aiding that, we'd note, is that he's been surrounded by people who have been telling him that he's really smart his entire life.  Everyone has witnessed something like that personally, where somebody is protected from reality until they simply don't know what it is.

There's sort of a Chauncey Gardiner element to this, we'd note.  In the film Being There, a simple minded man is mistake for a genius and becomes an advisor to the President simply because of his appearance and apparent station in life.  It's very difficult for most people to accept that somebody who has achieved apparent success isn't extremely smart.  I recall my mother, for instance, being of the view that Barrack Obama must be a genius (I'm not saying that he wasn't) because he was a lawyer.  It doesn't take smarts to become a lawyer, and one of the most successful ones I ever met with not a smart man at all.  He was just lucky.

Added to this, people, once they latch on to a figure, tend to attribute their own values to him.  We've seen this in spades with Trump. He's not a religious man, but people believe he is. There's no reason to believe he cares about most of the populist agenda, unless doing so aids him personally, but people believe he does.

The scary thing here is, unlike the first time when Trump had people to real him back in, he doesn't now.  If he's not demented, and therefore not capable of being removed, he can do pretty much any dumb thing he wants to over the next four years.

He's simply narcissistic and amoral.

Full bore narcissism and complete amorality is really rare.  Even people that most other people accuse of narcissism are capable of at least some empathy.

Likewise, complete amorality is very rare as well. Even people with loose morals usually have some.

But not always, in either case.

Indeed, it's well know that psychopaths have no empathy for other people.  And some of them, we'd note, are pretty smart.  According to some, Julius Rosenberg, the Communist spy, was an example of all we've mentioned here.  He was really smart and only cared about himself.

Trump was raised in an environment in which only success mattered and only money determined what was success. That was the Trump culture, and by all available evidence, Trump took to it and thrived in it.

Nothing other than Trump matters to Trump.  That's pretty much it. And given that, cheating on spouses, dumping associates, switching positions, lying, and screwing the entire nation are okay if it benefits his view of himself.

And that explains why he completely baffles his opponents and why his admirers admire him. Those opposed to him cannot grasp how anyone can't see through Trump.  Those who admirer him can't bring themselves to believe that he doesn't care about them whatsoever, or the country, or anything other than himself.  

Normal people don't behave like Trump to that degree. Trump's an example of what the world would really be like if John Lennon's Imagine ruled the day.

Trump sees a world in which there are no values, no religion, and nothing, other than Trump getting all he can get.

I'd note, however, that in a way, Trump, if viewed this way, is the ultimate expression of his generation, the "Me Generation".  Not everyone, or even most, in it, but the generational ethos as a whole.  What matter was "me", not much else.  Trump expresses an extreme form of that, even if he acquired it at home from a father who was definitely not part of that generation.  That also makes it easier for his acolytes to vote for him, as some of them growing up sort of viewing the world that way themselves.  Other, however, likely most, really believe that Trump cares about their cost of living, their pocketbooks, and making "American Great."

Well, as we know, Leopards won't eat my face.

He's a Goodfella

Not literally, but rather by association.

Trump developed his real estate business in New York at a time at which if you were going to get by, you were going to deal with the mob.  If he has just as big of "big brain" as he claims, then he would have picked up how mobsters work, which to some extent is on bluff and threat.

The best example is from the movie The Godfather, which was closely based on the real behavior of the New York mafia.  When they wanted Jack Wolz to do something, they put a severed horse's head, from a beloved horse, in his bed. Wolz, who wasn't harmed himself, caved to their demands.

Trump constantly makes bluffs and threats, and in fact quite often his adversaries give him what he wants.  That may be his undignified and reprehensible negotiation style.  If a person is immoral enough, and unprincipled enough, that works. . . right up until it doesn't.

There's no "art" to this deal.  It's brutish.  

And, of course, sooner or later, it doesn't work.

And when that day comes, you have no friends.

Indeed, somebody ought to give Trump the test now.  When he says "I need this" somebody ought to say, come and get it.  

Harold Hardrada asked Harold Godwinson "How much of England will you give me?".  Godwinson replied "six feet, because you are bigger than other men".   In this administration, and soon, somebody is going to tell Trump "fuck you, and the horse that you rode in on", and the whole bluff thing just goes down the tubes.  Once you can't back a bluff up, it's implodes really quickly.

And then, you have no friends at all.

Here, for example, Denmark ought to tell the US to get its Space Farce base out within a few days.  We'd have to.  And if I governed Panama, the Canal  would actually be run by the Chinese within a few days.

Whatcha Gonna About It?

Not much.

And his supporters?

They'll just all claim they were never actually for him.

That's not the only possibility.

The Kremlin Candidate

Trump is a Russian asset. The only question is, is he knowingly one, or not, and why.


It's worth noting that it would truly be a master stroke politically if you could get your man into the Oval Office, if you were one of our enemies.  And then he could go about wrecking things on your behalf, destroying alliances, the economy and even simply our place in the world.


Nobody has every proven that Trump is a knowing Russian asset.  He's definitely a Russian asset, to be sure, but it may simply be because of his view of the world and his childish admiration of strong men, and maybe his wanting to be one.  Maybe its because on the eve of his own death, he wants to be remembered for something, and the only think he can think of is to be remembered as an American Napoleon.

But his relationship with the Russians has never been explained.  Do they have something on him, and if so what?

Many have wondered about this very question, but nothing has been proven.

Still, he's successfully taken a page out of the Nazi Party's book and broad cast lies so consistently that large sections of the US population believe them.  And now he's threatening our allies, and has to be taken seriously.

If Trump is a bought and paid for Russian asset, and largely only cares for himself, he's in an ideal position to simply bring the United States down.  He can alienate our relationship with our allies, destroy our economy, leave us a wreck, and turn us against each other.

And that's the best evidence that he's a Russian asset. That's exactly what he's doing.

Soviet literacy poster.

Related threads:

Hubris and Strange Coincidence.



Thursday, January 25, 1945. The Beginning of the Evacuation of East Prussia and the Nature of the Red Army.

"Members of the 9th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Division, march into Butgenbach, Belgium. 25 January, 1945. 9th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Infantry Division. Photographer: Pfc. Fred Linden, 165th Signal Photo Co."

While other dates are also used, this is generally regarded as the end of the Battle of the Bulge.  The 3d Army was across the Clerf and advancing.

German advances in the Ardennes had been completely eliminated by this date.

The US sustained, 19,000 kia, 47,500 wia and 23,000 mia.  The British suffered 200 killed and 1200 other casualties.  The Germans sustained 100,000 total losses.

Volksturm in East Prussia, January 20, 1945. By Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-R98401 / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5368820

The Red Army reached the Baltic north of Elbing, cutting off Army Group North.  The greatest mass evacuation in human history begins with the Germans removing 1.5M to 2M people from the region with 40 large passenger ships and other vessels.

Hitler relieved General Reinhart and appointed General Rendulic to what was renamed Army Group North.

The Germans blue up the Wolf's Lair.

This is a good place to interject a couple of things, which I was pondering on how to interject.

Starting with the evacuation of East Prussia, it was a monumental human tragedy.  One the Germans brought on themselves, but tragic nonetheless.  The character of the fighting at this point began to radically change as the Germans fought on their own ground.  That was in due in part to the character of the Red Army's troops, which we will get to below.  German troops of all types fought tooth and nail at this point, and not simply because they were servants of a monstrous dictatorship that didn't care if they lived or died.  They were fighting to give time to their families to get out of the way of the Red Army.

The Red Army was an armed mob and quite frankly crap. That's a really controversial opinion, but its hte case.  The Imperial Russian Army had been crap, the Red Army was also crap, and the current Russian Army is crap.  It was tactically bereft of the most part and simply relied upon having a lot of men to get killed, and it didn't care if they lived or died.

That can be said about the Germans as well, but the Soviets had a lot more troops to get killed.

A very early edition of the excellent podcast We Have Ways addresses this (I think its Episode 13, Our Russian Allies).  In truth, the myth that has come down of the Soviets doing more to win the war than the Western Allies is simply wrong.  The difference between the two is that the Western Allies used technology and intelligence and didn't spend the lives of its mean.  Most in uniform in the Western armies weren't even combat troops.  Most in the Red Army were cannon fodder.  As that episode explains, had the feared post war war between the West and the USSR actually broke out, the Western Allies would have defeated the Soviet Union.

One of the characteristics of the troops of the Red Army mob was that by this point it was a murderous band of rapist.  There's no two ways about.  They raped thousands of women, and often killed them immediately thereafter, leaving their ravished bodies by the side of the road.  The modern Russian Army has never really gotten over this, and remains criminal in its behavior.

This leaves us with an awkward situation in regard to the late war fighting.  There was really nothing admiral about the Red Army at all, save for a few exceptional leaders and a few exceptional pieces of equipment.  As much as people hate to admit it, but for Western support during the war, the Soviets would have brokered a peace with the Germans in 1943.

It can, perhaps, be said that the Soviet's soldier capacity for enduring horrific conditions was admirable, although in no small part that helped turn them into a mob.  Most of the men in the Red Army had grown up in deprivation and brutality and were therefore somewhat acclimated to suffering making them unique as combatants.  The Soviet failure to control their men once past the borders of the Soviet Union, however, is unforgivable.  Often missed, they weren't just mass rapist in Germany, but also at least in Hungary.

The other difficult portion of this is that late war German resistance to the Soviets was at this point such that its almost hard not to regard it as heroic.  A person doesn't however, as the Germans had brought this disaster upon themselves and acted like monsters inside the USSR.  At this point in many places they fought to the death for the German people, but upon reflection if they'd fought the onset of fascism in the 1930s none of this would have ever occurred.

The British land on Chedube Island south of Ramree in Burma.

The 37th Infantry Division occupies a large portion of Clark Field in the Philippines.

Grand Rapids Michigan became the first city in the United States to fluoridate their water.

Trump nominee Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., a wackadoodle, has suggested that Donald Trump will push to remove fluoride from drinking water.  Nuts have always thought fluoride was bad, even though its revolutionary effect on dental health is well demonstrated.  Trump tends to support whatever floats through his head, so we'll see.

Last edition:

Wednesday, January 24, 1945. Himmler given a field command.



Labels: 

    Sunday, January 25, 1925. Careless storage.

    Tutankhamun's tomb was reopened only to discovery that the pall covering the sarcophagus had been ruined due careless storage.

    The Wyoming Freedom Caucus, um oops, the Norwegian Fedrelandslaget, a right-wing political organization, was founded in Norway.  It was in decline in the 1930s, after Norwegian left wing parties abandoned their far left positions.  Quisling banned the organization after the invasion of Norway by the Germans as radical organizations hate other radical organizations.

    There are lessons in all of this . . .

    Last edition:

    Sunday, January 24, 1925. Solar Eclipse

    Monday, January 25, 1875. The Pinkertons raid the James home.



    Pinkerton agents raided the Clay County, Missouri home of Frank and Jesse James. They were aided, in this effort, by Unionist who had opposed Missouri throwing in with the traitorous South in the Civil War, and who retained grievances in the violent post Civil War world of Missouri.

    Frank and Jesse were not there, but a fire-bomb they used killed their brother Archie and injured their mother severely. The raid caused intense anger in Missouri, both for its violence, and due to retained insurrectionist sympathies.

    Last edition:

    Revival of a Bad Idea.

    The last time we had a lot of right wing firebrands in the Wyoming legislature, they tried to privatize wildlife.

    Well, of course, they're back at it:

    2025

    STATE OF WYOMING

    25LSO-0576

     

     

     

    SENATE FILE NO. SF0118

     

     

    Landowner hunting tags-amendments.

     

    Sponsored by: Senator(s) Pearson, Boner, Ide, McKeown, Smith, D and Steinmetz and Representative(s) Brady, Heiner, Lien, McCann, Schmid, Webber and Wharff

     

     

    A BILL

     

    for

     

    AN ACT relating to game and fish; authorizing landowners to sell their landowner hunting licenses as specified; requiring rulemaking; and providing for effective dates.

     

    Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:

     

    Section 1.  W.S.  231302(h) is amended to read: 

     

    231302.  Powers and duties.

     

    (h)  For purposes of promoting the maintenance of wildlife habitat and attaining wildlife management objectives pursuant to W.S. 231103 and in addition to duties prescribed under paragraph (a)(xiv) of this section, the commission shall promulgate rules and regulations governing the issuance of elk, deer, antelope and turkey hunting licenses to Wyoming landowners without subjection to prescribed means of competitive public issuance.  Fees assessed for licenses authorized under this subsection shall be equal to fees prescribed under W.S. 232101(j) for each species for which the license is issued. A landowner who has obtained a hunting license under this subsection shall be authorized to sell the hunting license to another person in accordance with the following:

     

    (i)  Licenses issued to anyone other than the landowner, including immediate family of the landowner, shall not be eligible for sale under this subsection;

     

    (ii)  The purchaser shall be subject to all applicable statutes and regulations concerning hunting licenses pursuant to this subsection;

     

    (iii)  The commission shall promulgate rules and regulations that govern the sale of hunting licenses and reissuance of the hunting license to another person once they have been issued by the department, pursuant to this subsection;

     

    (iv)  Licenses that are sold to another person authorized by this subsection shall be exempt from a landowner coupon payment pursuant to W.S. 233105(b).

     

    Section 2.  The game and fish department shall promulgate all rules necessary to implement this act.

     

    Section 3.  

     

    (a)  Except as otherwise provided by subsection (b) of this section, this act is effective July 1, 2025.

     

    (b)  Sections 2 and 3 of this act are effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.

     

    (END)

     

    1

    SF0118

     

    FWIW, as a stockman, the mantra that was put out by the sponsor, Laura Pearson, that "ranchers are hurting right now" is  complete bullshit. Time are really good for ranchers right now.