Showing posts with label 2025 White House Vandalization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2025 White House Vandalization. Show all posts

Monday, September 21, 2026

Flak Towers and Ballrooms.

During World War Two all of the major European combatants built flak towers to support anti aircraft guns. The German ones were particularly impressive.

Made out of massive amounts of reinforced concrete, they proved to be extremely difficult to remove after World War Two, although a lot of them were.  The large Berlin Zoo Tower proved to be very difficult to remove and required more than one attempt to do so.  

Ultimately, the effort to remove the concrete monstrosities just wasn't worth and some are accordingly left.

Not all, by any means.  Most of the flak towers in Berlin and Hamburg were demolished or partially destroyed but all six towers in Vienna were left standing

Trump is having his absurd ballroom built out of "nuclear grade" cement, so they're sort of being built like a flak tower.  Nuclear grade cement is in fact extremely durable and cannot be removed easily, or by conventional means.

Trump has specifically said that this is so the monstrosity cannot be taken down.

Well, nuclear cement or not, nuclear towers can be taken down.


At least so far, Trump's L'Arche de la défaite, another hideous monstrosity, is proposed to be built out of  standard concrete and covered with U.S.-sourced granite.  The granite will be easy to peel off and as triumphal arches are hollow, blowing it off the face of the earth will be easy.

This needs to occur.

Trump is an illegitimate occupant of the White House and not the President.  He's not qualified to occupy the office as he's an insurrectionist, and the Constitution prohibits that. AFter the Civil War, proving that a former Confederate was that was not a requirement to banning them from office. As they were known to be insurrectionist, the ban just applied.  It still does.

Leaving anything Trump touched that can be associated with him legitimizes him.  He's been a horrific disaster and everything associated with him should be scraped. Everything.

It needs to happen.

There are real reasons to fear that it will not.  Simple institutional laziness is one of them.  American government moves at the speed of Baby Boomers and that isn't fast.  A natural human dislike of wasting resources is another.

Still, it's interesting, there's an open and obvious fear in MAGA circles that it will in fact come down.  MAGA tends to repeat lines that Trump spouts as attempts to gain support, and the most recent one is that it will "benefit future presidents".  

Oh, how noble.

The fact of the matter is that the White House was always intended to be one thing, a house, and nothing else.  Giant ballrooms are something that fairy tale princesses have.  We're living in the real world, and a frightening real world at that.  We don't need a fairy tale ballroom.  We need a balanced budget and attention focused on the urgent topics of the day.

This needs to happen.

Friday, September 4, 2026

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 153rd Edition. The Hunt for the Golden Pheasants, Delusional monuments, Recovering the imaginary 1950s.

Ousted.


Maria Bartiromo was given the boot at Fox.

That's really remarkable.

Bartiromo managed to go from being a credible mainstream reporter to a Trump talking head after leaving going to Fox in 2014.  Her departure would indicate that we've entered the "Hunt for the Golden Pheasants" stage of the Trump regime in which there's localized uprising.  The recent resignation of the Secretary of the Army fits into that as well.

I seriously thought that by this point the 25th Amendment would have been invoked and we'd have a President J. D. Vance trying to cut his own path.  People like Hegseth would be gone.  There'd be no Iran war and the tariff experiment would be over.  What didn't count on wa the administration being made up of radical right wing Confederates and Seven Mountain adherents, as well as members of the Waffen Grenadier Brigade of the SS Charlemagne that have no place to go.  So it appears my prediction was incorrect, although there's still hope.  Having said that, those who plan on surviving the regime are beginning to make their exit, or are being tossed overboard.

Well, Bye Felicia.

Trying to sell.


Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum announced that the Trump Admin will begin a further vandalization project this upcoming week and very clearly he knows nobody wants it, and therefore is trying really, really, hard to sell it.  He took to Twitter trying to show that Presidents have so dearly wanted an arch   Witness:

Secretary Doug Burgum@SecretaryBurgum

We are pleased to announce that after a very long wait (over 125 years!), we are preparing to start, over the next two-week period, the excavation work necessary for the Great Triumphal Arch and Military Observation Deck, at Memorial Circle on Columbia Island between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery. This will be one of the Great Pieces of American Architecture, honoring the history and significance of Arlington Cemetery and befitting the most powerful Capital in the World.

For over 125 years, Congress and various congressionally chartered commissions decreed that a monumental work should adorn Columbia Island. In 1902, the U.S. Senate’s “McMillan Commission” called for “a concourse suited to memorial treatment be established” on the westerly terminus of the Memorial Bridge.

In 1924, the congressional chartered Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission stated, “[Columbia Island] was always considered as a suitable site for formal park treatment, a fitting end for the Memorial Bridge, as well as an important feature in itself.” Specifically, the Commission called for “a plaza with fitting architectural adornment in a measure supplemental to the Lincoln Memorial across the river.”

Despite Congress’s intent, the site became and remains today a barren traffic circle lacking any monumental treatment and significant historic value. In fact, the passage extending from Arlington Memorial Bridge to Arlington National Cemetery was meant to serve as an Avenue of Heroes.

In the years after World War II, Ulysses S. Grant III— who was the grandson of the former president and Union general Ulysses S. Grant, executive officer of the Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission, and member of the National Capital Park and Planning Commission—decried the state of Columbia Island as a “temporary road with an informal circle.” He lamented that “the central plaza on Columbia Island had never been undertaken and seems to be absolutely essential to link together the two parts of the project, namely the main bridge itself and the entrance to Arlington Cemetery.”

Over 70 major cities/capitals around the world, from London, Paris and Rome to Madrid, Athens and New Delhi, all showcase beautiful arches. Interestingly, Washington, DC, is the only major Western capital without an arch. Now after 125 years of waiting, the most powerful capital in the world will be home of the most spectacular and beautiful arch of them all!

M'eh.

Nobody wants it except for King Donny.  The irony of building a triumphal arch while losing a war is really rich for one thing, and this is a huge monstrosity.

Maybe if they were going to put something there, they could put up a small monument (not gilded) to Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus.  He could serve as an example to these guys.

Anything one government builds, another can rip down.

The U.S. Army blows the Swastika off of the Nuremberg parade grounds.

Anyhow, at last there's a really growing movement to rip this crap, including the ballroom, down as soon as Trump is out of office.

This from Senator Ted Lieu:

Here is my prediction: the Democratic presidential candidate who promises to restore the White House to what it looked like pre-trump will win the primary and the Presidency.

I"m seeing a lot of that now.

Just ripping it down might be illegal. But then the Supreme Court has already established that  you can get away with building this crap even if it is illegal, and ripping stuff down takes a lot less time than putting it up.

On the White House, by the way, the wings were added in 1902.  With one already gone, they ought to take the other out in my opinion and just restore the building to its original architectural integrity. The wings don't look great to start with and the ballroom looks absurd.

A trip down Trump's memory lane.

An Albert Dornei illustration of how bowling was once imagined in the urban world of the 1950s.  Posted via fair use exception.

The Trump administration has announced its renovating the bowling alley in the White House as well.

The bowling alley story really brings into focus the way that the Trump administration, captured by the decaying mind of Donald Trump, is sort of a monument to an imaginary 1950s where everyone was urban, white, middle class, or maybe upper middle class.

I realize that people still bowl, but bowling reached the apex of its popularity in the 50s and 60s when automatic pin setters came in.  Golfing peaked later, in the 90s and 2000s, but the mental image of golfing in a lot of ways, in terms of its popular image, is from an earlier era.  Ballroom dancing was biggest in the mid 20th Century, basically from when the American population started to rapidly become urban and music, first jazz, and then later big band, dominated.

7up ad featuring bowling, 1963.

A popular study of the decline of American culture in some ways is titled "Bowling Alone".  A person can look at this in a lot of ways, but the cultural evolution of the country, which has been negative in many, maybe most, ways has hit all of this stuff.  One big factor, and yes here we go again, is that the demographic rabbit in the snake of the Baby Boomers changed all of this.  Bowling, as noted, is still sort of a big deal, and its charmingly portrayed in The Big Lebowski, but even when I was young most young people didn't bowl, and regarded it as, well, square.  Big halls where you had to rent shoes and dispirited older blue collar workers hung out, drank Budweiser, and smoked cigarettes lacked appeal.  If you talked to our parents generation, however, you'd see that isn't how they viewed bowling when they were young at all.


Golf had a real reputation as an upper middle class sport when I was young. The sort of sport that lawyers and doctors engaged in and talked shop.  I still sort of regard it that way, although that time has passed too, and now I think of it as a sport that is played by old lawyers and doctors.  I know that's not really fair, but there's an element of truth to it.



Ballroom dancing is something that was dead as a doornail by the time I was old enough to hit any kind of a dancefloor, by which I mean a high school gym.  The 60s had killed it.  Indeed, this was illustrated recently by a video going viral of elderly people dancing to AC/DC at a nursing home.  I've wondered if that would occur. For years, if you went to a nursing home at certain times of the day, you'd hear The Lawrence Welk Show blaring.  

I'll be that's not the case anymore.

Well, for somebody like Trump, who is old, wealthy and likes to golf, and is old, and has big structures, and is old, all this probably seems a lot like taking a trip back to the past, like watching American Graffiti. One thing about the really wealthy is that they hang on to certain social aspects of the past more than other classes, so a wealthy hotelier like Trump probably did grow up thinking ballrooms were cool, and probably still does.

Going back to the past is a pretty strong desire for the old, and particularly strong for the demented old.  I'm told that my dying grandmother on my mother's side, as her dying words, noted that my grandfather "sure can play tennis" no doubt recalling what he'd been like when they were young.  Trump's now fixated on his reputation and on building.  He's building like crazy, and building his way back to the past.

Of course, most old people can't command the entire resources of the nation to attempt to reconstruct an imaginary past.

Sic transit gloria mundi

Trump's monuments in stone will only last as long as Americans tolerate their presence.  They shouldn't tolerate them for more than one second after he's gone.  The next administration should tear them all down on the very first day of the next adminsitration.

It's necessary.

Last edition:

King Donald's War, Part 12. The "Economic D-Day" edition. CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 152nd Edition, the irony edition.

Tuesday, July 7, 2026

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 143rd Edition. The Chopper Edition.

And now it's a helipad

King Donald has spent a lot of his time this term of office remaking Washington D.C. itself.  He's already vandalized the Rose Garden, the East Wing, and the Reflecting Pool. Messing with buildings is something he is familiar with, and which he fancies himself good at, even though the evidence from D.C. is that he has the taste of a 19th Century bordello owner.

Now it's a helipad.  It'll be granite and on the White House grounds, and have the Presidential Seal on it.

The supposed reason is that the new Marine Corps 1 choppers are bigger, or more powerful, than their predecessors and therefore weren't working out well on the White House lawn.

The new helicopters are Sikorsky VH-92 Patriots. They are big.

Trump claims that Sikorsky will pay for the pads.  Lockheed Marine, which now owns Sikorsky, has more or less confirmed that.

I'll credit some of this story as credible.  These giant helicopters are really heavy, no doubt, and Washington D.C. is a swamp.  It may indeed have surpassed the dent in the lawn level.

Still, there's reason for concern.  Not one of Trump's major DC endeavors has worked out well. The East Wing desecration is way over the original price estimate and is likely to be torn down as soon as the illegitimate claimant to the office is out.  The Rhino Lining on the reflecting pool has been a disaster and has lead to a false criminal charge against an innocent former Olympian. Just on sheer experience, there should be concern that the price here will be off, the taxpayer will foot the bill (which maybe in this instance they should) and that it'll go badly.

Moreover, the helicopters maker footing the bill is disturbing, relationship wise.

Marine Corps 1 itself is one of those things that has turned the Presidency from being representative of the people into a type of king.  Eisenhower introduced it in 1957 as he wanted a quick way to get to his summer home in Pennsylvania.  There's no reason that the taxpayer should have been stuffed with that.  Now we've been stuck with a Presidential helicopter ever since.

Different countries, it might be noted, approach this differently.  Lots of countries do use government aircraft for chief executives, but some really restrain it.  Finland is one example.  It has aircraft for the chief executive, but if that person is traveling long distance, they do so commercially  A relatively recent Mexican president intentionally did that.

There's probably no way around this at this point, but frankly it is a bit much.

Last edition:

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 142nd Edition, 25th Amendment Watch 21st Edition. The Vietnam Rag, Red Scare Editions.

Friday, May 15, 2026

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist, 131st Edition. Ballroom Blitz

Since the White House Correspondence Association's Dinner attack, Donald Trump has gone full gonzo on his pet project, a ballroom.

In the United States of 2026, with a massive deficit, declining world status, a war its loosing, a culture that's moved beyond balls, only Trump and his acolytes, most of whom have never been in a ballroom, care about this project.  Probably for that reason we're hearing all sort of excuses on why this is an absolute necessity.  It's for the safety of the President and for a military command and control bunker.

Both of which are two really good reasons not to build it.

Underneath the ballroom would be a giant command and control structure.  It would replace the secret but not so secret Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) dating back to World War II. The PEOC was itself an example of paranoia.  It was probably much more useful during the Cold War than it was during World War Two.

It probably is obsolete.  Times change.

All of which is a good reason not to build it.

The fact of the matter is that since the start of World War Two security and privilege has attached to the office of the President at an ever increasing rate.  Special cars, special aircraft, a dedicated helicopter and a house with a bunker.

In recent years some paranoid Americans who like to imagine the world turning to shit, by which they mean the United States as the rest of the world doesn't count, have built their own bunkers.  It's fun.  It provides them with a false sense of security.  But they can't launch wars.

The President can and he's launched two so far with a third nearly inevitable.  Surrounded by security as he is, he probably feels perfectly safe, although the dinner attack would tend that isn't really true.  Anyhow, people feeling perfectly safe do dumb and destructive things.

Trump himself is a perfect example of that. His income  has made him feel perfectly safe from economic disaster and convinced himself that he's an intelligent man.  And during his administration men who raped teenage girls have been safe, due to their association with him.  The amount of financial oddities going on during Trump's administration has shown that lots of people associated with him feel pretty safe doing things they would not otherwise do.

And Trump has felt free to participate in a war that murdered the oppositions political leadership.

Nobody should feel that safe.

That is, I realize, as shocking thing to say, but a leader should, at least to some degree, share the fate and dangers of his people.  Lots of Americans go about their daily activities knowing they could be killed at random and nobody is going to do anything about it.  Servicemen in the Middle East no doubt knew right from the onset that they were not safe from Iranian attacks.  Quite frankly, Americans here in the United States aren't free from Iranian attacks either, we've just been oddly lucky so far.

The President of the United States, whomever he is, ought to be in the same situation as the rest of us, no matter who he is.  No one man is that valuable such that he should benefit from billions of dollars of effort to set him aside in safety from the people he serves.

And the same for the military.  We have command and control facilities already.  We have enough.  If we don't, well, that would be odd and so be it.

Last edition:

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist, 130th Edition. Narratives

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Ballroom Batshit. A demented president goes full bonkers. The 25th Amendment Watch List Fifteenth Edition and Court Watch Part VI.

This is so insane, it's not clear which category of trailing thread to put this in, so we'll give it its own post of dishonor.

It appears pretty clear that Trump himself penned part of this pleading that's being filed as a motion over the ballroom. The lawyers who signed the pleading should be ashamed.






Trump is nuts. Anyone supporting him, is supporting a madman.

cont:

This is not normal.

Last prior editions:

Republicans. You have reached July 20, 1944. You can either act with the insurgents and save your party (maybe) or go down in the bunker and destroy it for a generation, or more.



Sunday, April 26, 2026

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist, 128th Edition. Attempted assassination at a pointless event.

The 127th edition of this was teed up to go before last night's White House Correspondence Dinner, or this would be that edition.  Having the other one ready to go, I went ahead and ran it. 

I didn't realize anything had happened right away until I went upstairs and my wife was watching a little of the news feed.  It was fairly typical with the press doing the usual "oh gosh, who could the target have been" routine.  We all know who the target was, Donald Trump.

This is a tragedy, even though nobody was hurt, thankfully, for a variety of reasons, one being that while there are now questions about how the assailant "got so close" (in a country armed to the hilt, Trump probably comes surprisingly close to armed people every single day), what this accomplishes once again will be to help rally people around Trump.  I know that's not supposed to be the first observation, but it's quite true.

Trump has been sinking like a rock in popularity but people rally around somebody who is attacked.  And in the MAGA camp, where quite a few people believe that Trump is on some sort of Devine mission, it'll be seen as proof of that.

That this occurred is not a surprise at all.  Trump is an illegitimate President who vomits hatred on a nearly daily basis.  He inspires hatred of him and is likely the most hated American President since Abraham Lincoln.  He is a horrible human being.  

None of that justifies an attempt at murder, but it's not surprising the attempt was made.  What's additionally interesting, fwiw, is the far right of this country effectively adopted the concept of tyrannicide during both Biden's and Obama's terms in office, so in a way, that set the table for something like this to occur in a way that didn't exist when there were attempts on prior Presidents.

With this attempt, depending on how you look at it, Trump holds the record for the most attempts on a Presidents life.  Having said that, if you limit that to while a figure is in office, he's tied with Ford if you regard him as being presently in office.

I probably would have skipped mentioning the dinner as its shameful that it even occurs anymore.  

Some outside commentary on it:

Inside the Ballroom: Chaos and Confusion

One wonders if the surreal events of Saturday night might make it hard to return to the familiar conception of the White House Correspondents Dinner.

That article by a reporter who was there.  

Surreal?  Maybe, but by this point in Trump's illegitimate reign I suspect a lot of people are like me.  We know that this was a horrible event but it hardly even registered on the attention meter.  Trump so dominates the news with his horrible behavior that even when its directed at him, it's hard to really get too worked up about it.

Again, I don't condone this, and the effect will aid Trump, who needs to be removed via the 25th Amendment.  

About the dinner itself, a lot of people, myself included, flatly feel that it should have been cancelled, or at least Trump should not have been invited.  He treats the Press horribly, and yet there they are, worshipping him.

Aid and Comfort to the Enemy

The recklessness of the White House Correspondents’ Association’s self-own

A cartoon:

The WH Correspondents' Dinner

Unethical and tone deaf

Apparently J.D. Vance and sycophantic today Mike "Toady" Johnson were at the event.  Of interest, the Secret Service rushed Vance off first.

That's interesting.

If that comes up again, I'm sure there will be some solid explanation, but I wonder if its just not a combination of fatigue on the part of security as well.  Vance and Trump probably have separate security details and Trump's is probably numb from having to be around such a horrible person constantly.

On clearing the room, the excessive number of iPhone cameras anymore means everything is photographed to the hilt and then over analyzed.  That's already happening, but as horrible as something like this is, it can lead to some semi assuming photographs, none of which would be the slightest bit amusing if you were there.

One is that Kennedy Jr. appeared to leave his wife behind as he was escorted out to safety. His wife, actress Cheryl Hines, later explained that her formal dress hindered her ability to get out and she had to be carried.

Stephen Miller basically shoved his wife out, which is understandable, but photographically unfortunate too, as he was leading her while behind her and his hand was unfortunately placed for control on her upper torso, um, well anyhow.

On the post scene photographs, one security figure is clearly carrying a SIG M17 in the same photograph as a female security officer carrying a Glock 19.  The M17 is way larger.  It had the conventional iron sights.

The man carrying it was way larger than the female officers as well.  I know that in 2025 a person isn't supposed to feel these things but in at least two of the Trump attempts a female secret service officer has been present and just the photographs don't inspire confident in me.  That's probably just me.  Anyhow, well. . . 

Well, a slight addition.

Since the decline in sartorial standards, Secret Service officers are absurdly easy to pick out. They're always wearing dark suits.  I have a photograph of Theodore Roosevelt from 1903 or so in which a Secret Service officer is wearing tweed and a newsboy cap.  Much harder to pick out.  The women are even easier to pick out as women don't normally wear dark business suits.

Glocks leave me unimpressed as well.  M'eh.

Trump promised to reschedule the event, which of course, wasn't his to schedule in the first place.

Trump offered some comments from the White House.  Included in those were that the military is demanding the ballroom.

The military probably doesn't normally provide any sort of security to the President at all, although the man with the M17 is interesting as he was clearly in some security role, and was not in the Secret Service, and probably in the military.  That aside, the military probably doesn't give a rats ass about the ballroom in this context.  Trump just makes crap up.

What does seem to be the case is that there's a giant bunker being built under where the ballroom is supposed to go, but won't.  We only know the details of that which we know as Trump can't stop his verbal diarrhea. 

It is an interesting aspect of this however is how much of the White House destruction was motivated by a military request, and then taken advantage of by the White House, if it was.

I'll add that building giant bunkers leads to an inflated sense of self worth on the part of everyone involved.  That part of this project ought to be halted as well.

One final note.  Most people who attempt to assassinate Presidents are nuts.  This is notable as by an large, their efforts are incredibly poorly done.  This is true of nearly every historical assassination attempt.  Of all of them, Lee Harvey Oswald's was by far the most competent attempt, which is probably why people insist it must have been a conspiracy.

Not that this isn't already happening here.  I've already read claims that this attempt, and all the prior ones, on Trump's life were staged.  They weren't, but something remarkable here is that Trump, Vance and Johnson were all present, which is stupid.  The argument would be that you know they were staged, as the government would never be so dim as to put the first three people in line for power in the same public room.

Oh yes it would.

Rubio was there too.

Given the line of succession, if a competent attacker was president, Chuck Grassley might now be President.  That would assume a lot of skill that most attempted assassins really lack, which is a good thing for everyone.  Indeed, even well trained assassins tend not to pull regime change off, as the repeated German Army failures on Hitler demonstrate.

It does demonstrated a lot of hubris, however.  We are presently at war with a country whose entire leadership was assassinated early on.  Murdering the leadership of opposing combatants is generally regarded as beyond the Pale in war.  We did not do it in World War Two, and our opponents didn't attempt it either.  The targeting of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto in Operation Vengeance during World War Two is still controversial.  It was well known that Trump would be at this event and it was likely known that members of his cabinet would be too.  That Iran did not regard the event as a target of opportunity says a lot about their restraint, and frankly, their intelligence.   They could literally have decapitated the administration and left a person so old in charge that he would have had to resign.  I don't know how many members of Trump's cabinet were in fact there.  Maybe all of them.

Last edition:

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist, 127th Edition. The Dipshit Edition. The Wyoming Freedom Caucus decides the a General officer of the U.S. Army is too "woke" to be the President of UW.

Saturday, April 25, 2026

Court Watch, Part V.

 Expect a major hissy fit.


I think we can confidently assume this project is dead, and that some lesser more useful construction will take place after Trump is out of office.

The judge ruled that the plaintiff was likely to prevail as the administration likely lacks the authority they tried to exercise here.

They should refund the money and Trump should pay for this destruction himself.

April 1, 2026

Trump's executive order on mail voting is set to face legal challenges

April 2, 2026

From the CST:


Basically the judge decided the issues in the two matters weren't sufficiently identical for consolidation.

On other matters:
Lex Anteinternet: Courthouses of the West: Donald Trump attends oral...: Courthouses of the West: Donald Trump attends oral arguments in Trump v. Ba... : That's the birthright citizenship case. Trump's goi...
I posted this yesterday.

Courthouses of the West: Donald Trump attends oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara

Courthouses of the West: Donald Trump attends oral arguments in Trump v. Ba...: That's the birthright citizenship case. Trump's going to lose this case, which will be another example of the wheels coming off of h...

Donald Trump attends oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara.

That's the birthright citizenship case.

Trump's going to lose this case, which will be another example of the wheels coming off of his administration.  His presence at the Court will not impress anyone, let alone the Justices. Trump seems to have lost any sense that he's not that impressive to about 70% of Americans.

His attendance is, frankly, appalling.

Cont (April 1, 2026)

JUSTICE NEIL GORSUCH: Do you think Native Americans today are birthright citizens under your test and under your friend's test?

D. JOHN SAUER, U.S. SOLICITOR GENERAL: I think so. I mean, obviously, they've been granted citizenship by statute ...

GORSUCH: Put aside the statute. Do you think they're birthright citizens?

SAUER: No, I think the clear understanding that everybody agrees in the congressional debates is that the children of tribal Indians are not birthright citizens.

GORSUCH: I understand that's what they said. But your test is the domicile of the parents, and that would be the test you'd have us apply today, right?

SAUER: Yes, yes. So, if a tribal Indian, for example, you know, gives up allegiance to ...

GORSUCH: Are tribal members born today birthright citizens?

SAUER: I think so, on our test, if they're lawfully domiciled here. I'm not s—, I have to think that through, but that's my reaction.

GORSUCH: I'll take the yes. That's alright.

Gee Louise, this administration is really something. 

It turns out that Trump left after Justice Jackson pretty much eviscerated the solicitor, D. John Sauer, who was sent to argue this.  Sauer's career really ought to be over for such a lame argument that was so obviously legal deficient.  He's a former Missouri solicitor and, more important, one of the lawyers who was willing to represent Trump in the past.

April 14, 2026

Trump predictably lost his defamation suit against the Washington Post.

And perhaps something will happen on Gray's ignoring Wyoming's voter confidentiality laws.


April 17, 2026

An attempted end run to fund the garden shed was again blocked by the Federal Court.

April 21, 2026

Kash Patel has sued The Atlantic claiming that an article that claims he has an alcohol problem is defamatory.

April 22, 2026

April 25, 2026
This is sad, but not unexpected, news.

The thing that really gets me here is the remarkable photograph of the three principal female figures in this contest on the abortion side.  There they are, sharing a good laugh, while supporting infanticide.

Abortion is flat out murder, there's no two ways about it.  Something about this made me look up the ages of the women in the photograph.

Burkhart was born in 65 or 67. . . apparently people aren't really sure.  Anthony in 66-68.  Lichtenfels, whom I once knew, probably around 61-62.  So they all grew up in the 60s and 70s when abortion was really gaining ground.  It certainly did that.  A huge number of babies are murdered in the Western world, including the U.S., every day.  The seas of blood on that score outstrips anything the Nazis or Soviet Communists did.  It's part of what's corrupted the United States and given us our current era.

What I wondered about generationally doesn't pan out, however.  Support for abortion is pretty strong across generations in this country, although obviously not so strong that the legislature here doesn't keep trying to legislate against it.

What the legislature needs to do is to work to repeal the health care self determination provision of the state constitution that paranoid far righters got inserted into it several years ago.  If they did, we wouldn't be having this argument now.

Last edition:

Court Watch, Part IV.