Conclave: late Middle English (denoting a private room): via French from Latin conclave ‘lockable room’, from con- ‘with’ + clavis ‘key’.
Ostensibly exploring the practice of law before the internet. Heck, before good highways for that matter.
Thursday, May 8, 2025
Conclave
Monday, February 24, 2025
Lex Anteinternet: What's Wrong with the United States? Cultural and linguistic ignorance.
Lex Anteinternet: What's Wrong with the United States? We're really...: Can you imagine this scene today? The older man (who in context is probably in his 50s) would be staring blankly into space, while the youn...
Let's revisit this topic just a bit.
I went to university in the 1980s. Prior to entering university it was emphasized to me that I'd need to learn a foreign language. I checked it out, and that was in fact quite correct. The courses of study I was looking at, which were scientific in nature, all required foreign languages in order to graduate.
In junior high I took French. The options were French, Latin, or Spanish. French was my choice as my mother spoke French and I had a cultural connection to it. In high school I took German, as my father knew it and I had a cultural connection to it. In university, as a science major, I took German. Two semesters of basic German and one of German literature, in German. I.e., the whole class was taught in German.
It's not too much to ask.
I've never regretted a moment I've dedicated to languages outside of the mother tongue.
My father took German in university and already spoke it and Latin. My mother majored in French, which she already knew how to speak, but she knew Latin as well.
A century ago a university student wouldn't have made it out of university without a command of Latin and Greek.
For that matter, a university student, no matter what they would have taken, would have had a familiarity with the Middle English classics.
These things are not unimportant. Part of the reason we are in the fix we are today is that the occupant of the Oval Office speaks gibberish, like an uneducated moron. Many Americans who are ostensibly well educated cannot get by, even in a rudimentary fashion, in a foreign tongue. In this regard, the average illegal immigrant from south of the border is much better educated linguistically and culturally than the average American.
Exposure to a foreign language, even if you forget it, is illuminating as the culture of the language will come to you to some degree. This presents a strong argument for Latin returning as a requirement for university, as we're all latent residents of the Roman Empire and don't know it, through its culture. Electing a Presiden twho speaks GibberyDoo is good evidence of how far we've fallen. Like the Vandals smashing the mosaics to see if the animals were trapped in the floor, we're smashing the country and the culture as we're equally ignorant.
That can be stopped, and should be.
Thursday, February 6, 2025
Monday, August 28, 2023
The UW Sorority Suit.
This suit's result has hit the news, and because it involves an evolving societal topic regarding fiction and how far we're willing to entertain it in the name of individualism, we're going to make a couple of comments.
Page 1 of the 41 page decision:
1. As soon as this came out, some commentator on Twitter immediately suggested it must have been decided by a "Casper judge".
Eh?
It's not as if Casper is stocked with liberal judges or something. This is a Federal Court case, moreover, and we only have three Federal judges, two in Cheyenne and one in Casper. This was decided by Judge Johnson in Cheyenne. He's been on the bench since 1985 and was appointed by that flaming liberal, Ronald Reagan.
Having said that, not all of Regan's "conservative" appointments were impressively conservative. Take Anthony Kennedy, for example.
Be that as it may, Judge Johnson is universally recognized as a solid judge. The weird suggestion that it must have been some flaming liberal, and that the flaming liberal must be in Casper, as where else would they be, is weird.
2. This was decided "without prejudice", which means on technical and procedural grounds. The suit hasn't decided the issues. It can be brought again.
Whether it will be or not, nobody knows. But this doesn't decide any legal issues.
Often lawyers don't regard dismissals with prejudice as that big of deal, quite frankly, as it gives them the chance to go back and refine their suit.
This gets at one of the big problems in perception of courts today, however. A large number of people believe that judges are supposed to rule on existential issues. They are not. This perception, moreover, is made worse by pundits like Robert Reich who continually suggest that activists' courts are deciding these issues on a left/right basis, something made worse by decades of prior conservative yapping that "activist judges" were deciding things for the left, the latter of which was somewhat true. Most of the time judges are just deciding things on the law, or even procedure, that have nothing to do with the existential issues. The continual "America is losing faith with its justice system" mantra that the press is chanting right now is because large elements of the press don't grasp that deciding social issues isn't what courts are supposed to do.
3. I learned in the opinion that the sorority calls itself a fraternity.
How odd. Deficit of understanding of Latin root words?
4. Judge Johnson did condescend to call Mr. Langford a "sorority sister". The guy has male DNA and, well, you know. He's not a girl, and this ongoing societal delusion is really absurd.
That's what really gets to people. It's a contest between individualist fantasy, and the degree to which everyone else must tolerate the fantasy, and reality. We're in an age when dangerous self-delusion must be accepted, a certain segment of society maintains.
This probably isn't over. So stay tuned.
Sunday, February 26, 2023
Pater Noster
PATER NOSTER,
qui es in caelis,
sanctificetur nomen tuum.
Adveniat regnum tuum.
Fiat voluntas tua,
sicut in caelo et in terra.
Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie,
et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris.
Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo.
Amen.
Monday, February 3, 2020
Takeaways from Super Bowl LIV
1. The Roman numerals for 54 are LIV.
When it gets to the big Roman numerals, I always get confused.
2. I'm older than the Super Bowl, although not by much.
The National Football League completed its 100th Season, which means that the NFL started in 1919.
Except it didn't. The NFL was founded on August 20, 1920. It hasn't started its 100th Season. This is the second year in a row that they've claimed 1919 as their foundational date, but it isn't.
3. The halftime show was weird.
And I do mean weird. I'm not sure what was up with it. Shakira's singing was lackluster and her dancing was both embarrassing and odd. Jennifer Lopez was effectively nude.
The whole thing was much like a cabaret scene out of Godfather II, which is supposed to demonstrate the fallen nature of pre revolution Cuba.
4. Why does a football game require a big halftime show?
I still don't get why this is. The entire thing was not only weird, but really overblown.
5. Electric cars are set to replace gasoline engined cards quicker than I supposed.
I had thought it would be a decade. The full scale electric car advertisements by major automobile manufacturers would strongly suggest that it'll be quicker than that. More on that tomorrow.
6. Virtue signalling works better in the abstract.
A few liberal media outlets spent some time hand wringing over the Kansas City Chiefs and their traditions, with the dying New Republic taking time out from advertising its trip to Cuba this year (maybe to see the cabaret?) to really dive off into the shallow end of this pool.
It's probably because my interest in sports is so small that I don't really worry much about this, but at any rate everyone seemed to get over it for the game.
7. It was the Women's Year in advertising, sort of, if not in the halftime show.
A few companies spent some time really attempting to show that they back women and women's causes, even showing some in football uniforms, even though actual physical size and strength requirements make football solidly a male game. To watch them, we'd nearly suppose that there was a campaign to require female admittance into the NFL, when in fact women are free to enter the NFL if they can play the game. Biology generally prevents that, although I'd be surprised if the day doesn't arrive when there's a female kicker (there was, fwiw, a female professional baseball player as early as 1922). That's not the point.
The point is that its really odd to see the advertisements in the same year that featured a blatantly sexist halftime show. Perhaps a person isn't supposed to say that, as both performers are Latina performers and much of the performance was in Spanish, but a pole dancing Jennifer Lopez isn't intrinsically different from a pole dancer at a strip club, particularly as Lopez started off wearing less than strippers probably wear when they start their act.
It's weird how in an era when we're having a trial of Harvey Weinstein for being a creeper we're parading Shakira and Lopez around nearly nude on stage.
Something is wrong with that.
8. The NFL has no pre war heroes?
Or so it would seem.
Professional football really wasn't a big deal until after World War Two, but you would think that in listing its fifty great players for its pre game celebration of its centennial it'd have found at least a few of them who played the game before 1945.
What about Jim Thorpe, for example?
9. Mr. Peanut is back.
Thank goodness.
Sunday, July 2, 2017
Lauda Sion Salvatorem: St. Thomas Aquinas, 1264
|
|