This major public access story hit the news here Thursday.
I'm quite familiar with this stretch of property. As a kid, before the recent owners who owned transferred it, I used to hunt part of it. I never asked for permission, even though I'm sure I should have. In those days, in the 70s, we asked for permission a lot less, and it was granted by fiat a lot more.
This is a real boon to sportsmen. It'll open up miles of river to fishing, and miles and miles to hunting. I've passed by deer and doves in this area a lot as I didn't have permission to go where they were. Now I'll be able to, although I hope the BLM makes as much of this roadless as possible.
I hope they also lease it out for grazing.
Indeed, I have some mixed feelings about this as I really hate to see a local ranch go out of production. The family that owned it had started off as sheepmen in Johnson County and moved down to Natrona County when their land was bought for coal production. Now they'll just be out of agriculture entirely, and I really hate to see that, even though I'm glad to see this didn't go to out of state interest. Indeed, what occurred is more in keeping with the purpose of the original Federal land programs, including the Homestead Act, than what often does occur with land sales now days.
I will note that, of course, in the age of the internet this of course resulted in moronic comments, including the blisteringly ignorant comment that its somehow unconstitutional for the Federal Government to own land. That comment is so dense that it should disqualify a person from going onto land in general until some education occurs.