Showing posts with label J. D. Vance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label J. D. Vance. Show all posts

Friday, March 6, 2026

Wars and Rumors of War, 2026. Part 4. Sumer and Elam.

 


You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come. Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom.

Matthew, Chapter 24.

You have to make sure you know why you are going to war and then use decisive force to end it as soon as possible.

Colin Powell, 

March 3, 2026

United States and Israel v. Iran

The war continues on, obviously, with the Administration struggling to explain what its about, why now, and why it can omit Congress from its constitutional duty.

It's expanded into a regional war, so far all aircraft and missiles.  Included in the exchanges are those between Hezbollah and Israel in Lebanon.

It's become perfunctory to note that the Iranian government is horrible, which it is.  It murders and rapes its own citizens in the name of an extreme variant of Shi'a Islam.  But, there are a lot of horrible governments in the world.  North Korea and Russia's are two such examples, Afghanistan's is another, and Trump of  course cut a deal with them allowing them to return to power.

The Iranians were going to have a nuclear weapon, it has been claimed, soon, with soon being a bit of a moving target.  A nuclear armed Iran would be frightening and that's the best argument for this offensive war, which would make it a preemptive defensive war. Even that argument, however, seems very poorly developed.

Marco Rubio gave the justification that, if another nation (Israel) attacked Iran, they'd attack us back, and that was an imminent threat.  He claimed Iran was going to be attacked.

That basically would amount to handing the power to declare war for the United States over to Israel.

It just seems that, in reality, an aged demented Trump looking for some sort of legacy was talked into it by the Neoconservatives and Apocalyptic Evangelist in his circle of influencers, with perhaps, probably, Israel itself playing a role in that.  Of all those goals, the Neocon one would be the least disturbing, which is not to say that it would not be disturbing.  

One disturbing thing about that is that NPR, in its Politics podcast, ventured the opinion, not put this way, that Trump is basically drunk on power and will keep toppling governments as long as he's successful in doing so. If that's the case, we can predict that Cuba will be next as its a pet project of Marco Rubio.

The US has lost some aircraft to friendly fire, which in the age of cell phone video, makes for interesting video.

Kuwaiti speaks to shot down U.S. pilot.

 


There's footage of this F-15 being shot down over Kuwait, which was a friendly fire incident.

I actually didn't know the F-15 was still in use by the US, but this very late model has only been in service since 2021.

An interesting thing on this video, other than its a female pilot (she was lucky, as she nearly went down in the sea) is that the video shows the airplane to be an F-15, which means the Air Force, and not just the Navy, is flying some of these missions.

The U.S. death toll is up to five.

Afghanistan v. Pakistan

Hardly noticed in all the general war exploding in the Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan are fighting.

Cont:

United States and Israel v. Iran

Reports have revealed that at more than 30 military installations, U.S. commanders told troops the war on Iran is a Christian war in support of its being launched.  One NCO reported that their commander told them today that the U.S. war is to bring about Armageddon and the return of Jesus Christ.

I know that this was going to occur, and at least one Evangelical pastor in the U.S. has said essentially the same thing.  This, I'd note, how Mike Huckabee sees the world.

So now we're at least partially in an American Evangelical Christian holy war against Shia Islam.  It'll be a shock to Evangelicals, but they're a tiny percentage of the globe's Christians, and the percentage of them that hold such Millennialist views is even smaller.  This is going to hurt us all, however. 

It's also being reported that J.D. Vance encouraged Trump to go "all in", for lack of a better word.  I'm not sure of his thinking, but he might be approaching this with a Clausewitzian view of how to wage the war, although that will require ground troops in the end.  From a military prospective, that argument has merit to it. What it lacks here is legality.

March 4, 2026

United States and Israel v. Iran

A Republican official attempted to justify the war on Iran with the figure that 700 Americans had been killed by Iran in the past 47 years.

Over 800 Iranians have now been killed by the US and Israel in the past five days.

The Republican-Evangelical Armageddon Death Pact to Kill the Earth and Bring Back Jesus

Cont:


The US sank an Iranian frigate off of Sri Lanka yesterday.  The attacking ship was a submarine.

Sinking enemy ships in wartime is legitimate. . . but this isn't a declared war.

United States in Ecuador

And we're now fighting somebody, just designated "terrorists", in Ecuador.

March 4, 2026, cont.

United States and Israel v. Iran

A Turkish missile was shot down over NATO ally Turkey and the Iranians launched a drone strike on an RAF base on Cyprus.

Without it apparently being obvious, both sides of this war are now lead or heavily influenced by competing apocalyptic visions.  The US, by the theologically thin and ignorant New Apostolic Reformation Puritans and the Iranians by the Shia theocrats.  Both want the wider war that they envision.

March 5, 2026

United States and Israel v. Iran

The Senate did vote on a war powers resolution that would have limited King Donny's ability to wage war.  It failed.

This is being somewhat hailed as a King Donny victory, but it isn't.  Actually, no matter how you regard the war, the fact that the vote occurred is a good thing as it somewhat, albeit very imperfectly, legitimizes the war.  There has been some sort of vote, in other words, although less than that which is required.

The vote was largely on party lines.

Name ▼StatePartyVote
Angela AlsobrooksMarylandDyes
Tammy BaldwinWisconsinDyes
Jim BanksIndianaRno
John BarrassoWyomingRno
Michael BennetColoradoDyes
Marsha BlackburnTennesseeRno
Richard BlumenthalConnecticutDyes
Lisa Blunt RochesterDelawareDyes
Cory BookerNew JerseyDyes
John BoozmanArkansasRno
Katie BrittAlabamaRno
Ted BuddNorth CarolinaRno
Maria CantwellWashingtonDyes
Shelley CapitoWest VirginiaRno
Bill CassidyLouisianaRno
Susan CollinsMaineRno
Christopher CoonsDelawareDyes
John CornynTexasRno
Catherine Cortez MastoNevadaDyes
Tom CottonArkansasRno
Kevin CramerNorth DakotaRno
Michael CrapoIdahoRno
Ted CruzTexasRno
John CurtisUtahRno
Steve DainesMontanaRno
Tammy DuckworthIllinoisDyes
Richard DurbinIllinoisDyes
Joni ErnstIowaRno
John FettermanPennsylvaniaDno
Deb FischerNebraskaRno
Ruben GallegoArizonaDyes
Kirsten GillibrandNew YorkDyes
Lindsey GrahamSouth CarolinaRno
Charles GrassleyIowaRno
Bill HagertyTennesseeRno
Margaret HassanNew HampshireDyes
Joshua HawleyMissouriRno
Martin HeinrichNew MexicoDyes
John HickenlooperColoradoDyes
Mazie HironoHawaiiDyes
John HoevenNorth DakotaRno
Jon HustedOhioRno
Cindy Hyde-SmithMississippiRno
Ron JohnsonWisconsinRno
Jim JusticeWest VirginiaRno
Timothy KaineVirginiaDyes
Mark KellyArizonaDyes
John KennedyLouisianaRno
Andy KimNew JerseyDyes
Angus KingMaineIyes
Amy KlobucharMinnesotaDyes
James LankfordOklahomaRno
Mike LeeUtahRno
Ben LujánNew MexicoDyes
Cynthia LummisWyomingRno
Edward MarkeyMassachusettsDyes
Roger MarshallKansasRno
Mitch McConnellKentuckyRno
Dave McCormickPennsylvaniaRno
Jeff MerkleyOregonDyes
Ashley MoodyFloridaRno
Jerry MoranKansasRno
Bernie MorenoOhioRno
Markwayne MullinOklahomaRno
Lisa MurkowskiAlaskaRno
Christopher MurphyConnecticutDyes
Patty MurrayWashingtonDyes
Jon OssoffGeorgiaDyes
Alejandro PadillaCaliforniaDyes
Rand PaulKentuckyRyes
Gary PetersMichiganDyes
John ReedRhode IslandDyes
Pete RickettsNebraskaRno
James RischIdahoRno
Jacky RosenNevadaDyes
Mike RoundsSouth DakotaRno
Bernard SandersVermontIyes
Brian SchatzHawaiiDyes
Adam SchiffCaliforniaDyes
Eric SchmittMissouriRno
Charles SchumerNew YorkDyes
Rick ScottFloridaRno
Tim ScottSouth CarolinaRno
Jeanne ShaheenNew HampshireDyes
Tim SheehyMontanaRno
Elissa SlotkinMichiganDyes
Tina SmithMinnesotaDyes
Dan SullivanAlaskaRno
John ThuneSouth DakotaRno
Thom TillisNorth CarolinaRno
Tommy TubervilleAlabamaRno
Chris Van HollenMarylandDyes
Mark WarnerVirginiaDyes
Raphael WarnockGeorgiaDyes
Elizabeth WarrenMassachusettsDyes
Peter WelchVermontDyes
Sheldon WhitehouseRhode IslandDyes
Roger WickerMississippiRno
Ron WydenOregonDyes
Todd YoungIndianaRno

Now the Republican Party owns this war.  

The Administration is already in violation of the War Powers Act as it didn't give proper notice for the war.  It would appear that under the act it's ability to wage war legally will expire in about 90 days.  Trump appears to be just dumb enough to believe that everything will certainly be okay in that period of time, which is far from guaranteed.

European wags are calling the war, which some idiot named Operation Epic Fury, Operation Epstein Fury.

cont:

The United States and a Gulf state are now seeking to purchase drone interceptors from Ukraine.

Rather ironic, really.

Trump has called on the Kurds in Iran to revolt.

That's a really problematic call to arms. The U.S. has a history of doing this with the Kurds and then not fully supporting them when the rise up.  Right now, there's a rump Kurdish state in Syria, and a Kurdish population in Iraq, that would like to form a bonafide state.  If the Kurds achieved a measure of autonomy in Iran, it'd be hard not to grant them full statehood.

That's fine, in my view, but it won't be fine in Turkey's view, which creates all sorts of problems.

cont:

The House also rejected a War Powers resolution to halt the war against Iran.  The vote was 212 to 219.

While this will go back in sixty days or so, this effectively amounts to Congressional authorization, although again, imperfectly.

Two Republicans voted to halt the war.  Four Democrats voted in favor of it.

March 6, 2026

United States and Israel v. Iran

It's increasingly clear that the U.S. is responsible for the strike on a school that killed over 100 young girls.  Apparently the structure was once used by the Iranian military, but has not been for some time.

Meanwhile:


The pastors told Trump that the love of money was the root of all evil and that he needs to repent for his deeply immoral life. . . oh wait, that didn't happen.

God will not be mocked

Galatians 6:7.

Sen. John Barrasso, who is mostly seen now days standing behind John Thune with a serious look on his face, dutifully spouted the "we've been at war for 47 years" line in the last couple of days, as if anyone cares what his opinion is on anything.  Everyone knows that if Trump came out later this week and said that we're killing school girls as we hate pistachios, Barrasso would repeat that.

Time asked King Donny about whether Americans should be worried about attacks in the U.S..  His reply:

I guess…We plan for it. But yeah, you know, we expect some things. Like I said, some people will die. When you go to war, some people will die.

Frankly, if Americans die, unless their names is Trump, Trump doesn't appear to care.  But why would anyone think he would care?

On this, Iran had decades to insert sleeper cells into the U.S., and they don't have to be staffed by Iranian nationals.   That doesn't mean, however that they did. Some nations that we assumed had done that in the past, like Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany, didn't.

It's always been assumed, and probably correctly, that the Soviet Union did.

Iran?  If they didn't, I can't imagine why they did not, but they may not have.

What is sure right now is that they haven't struck.  That doesn't mean they won't.  Using sleeper agents is usually reserved for what basically amounts to total war, and its risky.  Right now, all Iran really has to do is hang on until August or so, by which time if it hasn't surrendered, disgusted Americans will use the war against the GOP for being Trump toadies.  That appears likely to happen anyhow.  Use of agents might serve to simply make Americans mad, which could change that.

Strikes against economic targets, however, are another matter.  There's not an oil refinery in the US that a terrorist can't damage somehow and that would not only be potentially hugely disrupting, but it would require the domestic deployment of troops and drive up the price of oil like crazy.  It might also not so much anger, as opposed to scare, Americans.

What average Americans have to worry about is rogue individuals.  In a country in which its so easy to acquire arms, we're very open to attacks like that which happened recently in Austin, or in Australia.  The Trump regime would react to that by cutting into the 2nd Amendment.

Will that occur? Well it already has.  But even at that, it didn't happen during the Vietnam War, which might be the most comparable to what we're enduring right now.

Which doesn't mean that we shouldn't be worried.

But don't worry too much.  Donny, who lamented how many young men were being killed in the Russo Ukrainian War at one time, isn't concerned.  If you die, well, that's just one of those things.

The Washington Post reports that Russia is providing Iran targeting information.  

Cont:

King Donny has demanded an "unconditional surrender" by Iran, thereby completely removing any incentive the Islamic Republic has to enter into any sort of arrangement with the US whatsoever.

Generally, demand for unconditional surrenders are monumentally stupid and rarely work.  Such a demand in part caused the Third Reich and Imperial Japan to fight beyond the  point at which political forces in both countries would have ended those wars, and they (if we consider them to be two different wars) beyond the point at which they otherwise would have. Even at that, Japan's surrender actually turned out to have conditions imposed by Japan.

An unconditional surrender here would completely turn Iran's fate, and that of its Islamic regime, over to the United States.  Why wouldn't they just fight on?  This likely serves to strengthen the unpopular government.

It also puts the US military in a situation in which a ground invasion of Iran is practically mandatory.  Staging that will be difficult as the US is unlikely to gain the cooperation of Iraq or Turkey in that, and of course thanks to Donny's brilliant first term diplomacy, Afghanistan as a staging area it not an option.  Therefore it would appear a large scale maritime landing would be required.

Cont:

Well, the admiration is already trying to walk that back:

When he as commander in chief determines that Iran no longer poses a threat to the US and the goals of Operation Epic Fury have been fully realized, then Iran will essentially be in a place of unconditional.

Leavitt.

Last edition:

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist, 121st Edition and Wars and Rumors of War, 2026. Part 3. The War against Iran Edition and other Military Topics.

Saturday, February 7, 2026

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist, 116th Edition. Dissing J.D., What's the point of the National Prayer Breakfast?, Drip.

Boo

J. D. Vance was booed at the Olympics

No surprise, had I been at the Olympics, I'd have booed Vance, and I'm an American.  Trump has brought the U.S. into universal contempt, so that a symbol of it gets jeered is no surprise.

Vance must go home and cry seeing his chances of being President decline below 0 every day.  His only hope in the first place was the application of the 25th Amendment and so far, in spite of my expectations, no luck there.

Trump was asked about the event.

REPORTER: “The vice president got booed during the opening ceremony. What do you make of that frosty reception?”

PRESIDENT TRUMP: “That's surprising because people like him. Well, I mean, he is in a foreign country, you know, in all fairness. He doesn't get booed in this country.”

Truly, Trump is clueless.

Ignoramus at National Prayer Breakfast

I don't see the point of this anymore.

Truth be known, I probably never did.  I appreciate prayer, obviously, but this, at least in my memory, has been sort of a lukewarm American Civil Religion event in which the sitting President makes a nod towards religion  The same guy could have been chasing skirts all week and then sound like he was really sincere at the breakfast.

Here's JFK's 1963 speech there.

February 07, 1963

Senator Carlson, Mr. Vice President, Reverend Billy Graham, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, gentlemen:

I am honored to be with you here again this morning. These breakfasts are dedicated to prayer and all of us believe in and need prayer. Of all the thousands of letters that are received in the office of the President of the United States, letters of good will and wishes, none, I am sure, have moved any of the incumbents half so much as those that write that those of us who work here in behalf of the country are remembered in their prayers.

You and I are charged with obligations to serve the Great Republic in years of great crisis. The problems we face are complex; the pressures are immense, and both the perils and the opportunities are greater than any nation ever faced. In such a time, the limits of mere human endeavor become more apparent than ever. We cannot depend solely on our material wealth, on our military might, or on our intellectual skill or physical courage to see us safely through the seas that we must sail in the months and years to come.

Along with all of these we need faith. We need the faith with which our first settlers crossed the sea to carve out a state in the wilderness, a mission they said in the Pilgrims' Compact, the Mayflower Compact, undertaken for the glory of God. We need the faith with which our Founding Fathers proudly proclaimed the independence of this country to what seemed at that time an almost hopeless struggle, pledging their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence. We need the faith which has sustained and guided this Nation for 175 long and short years. We are all builders of the future, and whether we build as public servants or private citizens, whether we build at the national or the local level, whether we build in foreign or domestic affairs, we know the truth of the ancient Psalm, "Except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it."

This morning we pray together; this evening apart. But each morning and each evening, let us remember the advice of my fellow Bostonian, the Reverend Phillips Brooks: "Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men! Do not pray for tasks equal to your powers. Pray for powers equal to your tasks."

[The President spoke first to the gentlemen in the hotel's main ballroom and then to the ladies in the east room.]

Ladies:

I'm glad to be with you again this morning with the Vice President, Reverend Billy Graham, Dr. Vereide, Senator Carlson, the same quartet that was here last year and the year before.

I think these breakfasts serve a most useful cause in uniting us all on an occasion when we look not to ourselves but to above for assistance. On our way from the last meeting to this, we met two members of Parliament who carried with them a message from Lord Home to this breakfast, in which Lord Home quoted the Bible and said that perhaps the wisest thing that was said in the Bible was the words, "Peace, be still."

I think it's appropriate that we should on occasion be still and consider where we are, where we've been, what we believe in, what we are trying to work for, what we want for our country, what we want our country to be, what our individual responsibilities are, and what our national responsibilities are. This country has carried great responsibilities, particularly in the years since the end of the Second War, and I think that willingness to assume those responsibilities has come in part from the strong religious conviction which must carry with it a sense of responsibility to others if it is genuine, which has marked our country from its earliest beginnings, when the recognition of our obligation to God was stated in nearly every public document, down to the present day.

This is not an occasion for feeling pleased with ourselves, but, rather, it is an occasion for asking for help to continue our work and to do more. This is a country which has this feeling strongly. I mentioned in the other room the letters which I receive, which the Members of Congress receive, which the Governors receive, which carry with them by the hundreds the strong commitment to the good life and also the strong feeling of communication which so many of our citizens have with God, and the feeling that we are under His protection. This is, I think, a source of strength to us all.

I want to commend all that you do, not merely for gathering together this morning, but for all the work and works that make up part of your Christian commitment. I am very proud to be with you.

Kennedy, who was a (bad) Catholic, was only able to get elected by promising not to be really Catholic, an act of betrayal to his faith that has hurt Catholics ever since.  At least with Trump we don't have that, as he's some sort of undeclared Protestant, he says.  Crediting that claim, which I don't think deserves much credit, he's a really bad Christian.

None of which stops people like Franklin Graham and Paula White-Cain from praising him.

White Cain was pretty restrained in her opening remarks there.  She isn't always so restrained. Trump wasn't restrained in his babbling remarks, which departed greatly from Christianity.

I'm pretty skeptical about any real attachment, or perhaps understanding, of Trump to religion. Indeed, I'm firmly convinced the damage he's doing to Evangelical Christianity is deep.

Trump announced a May 17, 2026 national prayer gathering on the National Mall as part of the White House's 'America Prays' initiative, which encourages one million people to dedicate weekly prayer time. Such prayer would be beneficial no doubt, but a big gathering on the National Mall is a mistake.  It's going to gather a counter prayer demonstration for sure by Christians who see through Trump, and it'll likely generate a mass protest.  It'll be difficult to keep it from getting out of hand.

That's a Sunday.  Maybe J.D. can note that he has to go to Mass and skip out.

Drip

For the 2026 US Olympic drip, the teams has white duffle coats and a sort of winter themed sweater with the flag on it.  It looks nice, but Norway has accused the US of stealing the star motif on the sweater.

I have a duffle coat I wear as a winter overcoat.  I really like it.  I've had it for years and year, but oddly suddenly I'm getting compliments while wearing it.  It always catches me off guard as it is getting long in the tooth, but still I get a fair number of them.

The same is true with a Hanna Hats panel cap I've been wearing for about 25 years or so.  I've always received some compliments on it, but I"m getting a lot all of a sudden.  A guy actually interrupted a conversation he was having with a woman at a store just to ask me "what's that sort of cap called"?

In other somewhat surreal conversations, I picked up pizza on my way home from an unsuccessful goose hunt the other day and went into the joint in a heavy surplus European camouflaged coat.  I'm too cheap to buy the designer camo that other people do.  Anyhow, I parked my Jeep right in front of the place and when I went in the girl waiting the counter said "What kind of a car is that?"

It was a Jeep. 

That was a surprising question as Jeeps look like Jeeps and they have since the very first Jeep.

Probably because of my coat she then asked, after getting my pizza, "where you in the military"?  I affirmed and she thanked me for my service.

I note this as this sort of somewhat awkward but ready engagement seems common for people in Generation Alpha.  Indeed, back to the hat, I've had some young women, probably 20 years old or less, just look at me and say "I like your hat" in passing.  It's a little awkward and surprising.

When I was 20 myself, young women never told me that, darn it.

Last edition:

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist, 115th Edition. The Killing of Alex Pretti, Hageman flees the stage, ICE blocked in hotel.