Ostensibly exploring the practice of law before the internet. Heck, before good highways for that matter.
Wednesday, November 27, 2024
Getting the Economic Dope Slap
Tuesday, November 26, 2024
Seriously, blaming Canada?
What the crap?
How the DEA views it:
Doesn't seem like Canada is the problem. . . .
But then who pays attention to the facts anymore?
Subsidiarity Economics 2024. The Times more or less locally, Part 4. A return to Pre Covid statuts
US incomes have returned to their 2019 level, adjusted for inflation.
The adjusted rate of inflation was 2.9%.
While people will continue to complain, this is pretty close to being back to the economic status of 2019.
Oil dropped yesterday to $69/bbl.
September 25, 2024
Delta To Pull Out Of Casper Airport, Last Flight Is Dec. 3
Delta To Pull Out Of Casper Airport, Last Flight Is Dec. 3
September 10, 2024. Pearls Before Swine.
Last edition:
Subsidiarity Economics 2024. The times more or less locally, Part 3. The Decarbonizing the West and Electronic eartags Edition.
Sunday, November 17, 2024
Tuesday, November 17, 1914. Strained resources.
At Ypres, General Albrecht ordered all attacks to cease to allow reserve units to move to the Eastern Front. The Allies did not detect this change for three days.
And. . .
Falkenhayn Calls Off Western Offensives, Suggests Peace
The United Kingdom doubled income tax to cover war expenses.
Last edition:
Monday, November 16, 1914. Occupying Tsingtao
Tuesday, September 10, 2024
Saturday, September 10, 1774. Edenton Tea Party.
Penelope Barker organized 51 women in Edenton, North Carolina to protest taxation without representation.
Last edition:
Friday, September 9, 1774. The Suffolk Resolves.
Friday, August 30, 2024
What on Earth does the Republican Party stand for?
Ronald Reagan was the first President that I was able to vote for, or against (I voted for) in my lifetime.
The GOP of that era was far from perfect, but I knew what it stood for.
It was pro life, pro defense, tough on crime, pro fiscal responsibility, and overall conservative.
People have claimed that for the Trumpist GOP, but what of it?
1. Pro life?
The GOP went into this election cycle claiming responsibility, which it had every right to do, for the repeal of Roe v. Wade, which returned the abortion issue to the states. Not surprisingly, however, a controversial issue remains controversial. Now the GOP is running from the issue as quickly as it can. It took its pro life plank out of its platform, where it's been for decades. And now we have Trump, who has flip flopped on the issue for decades, stating this, in regard to a proposed six week provision in Florida:
I think the six week is too short, there has to be more time
This is really a simple issue. Either you believe that life starts at conception, or aren't sure when a human is a human and therefore you err on the side of life, or you think killing only matters at some arbitrary point in time in which you can't stomach it.
At best, the Republicans here can claim to support State's Rights, but pro life? Donald isn't.
Added to that is this, which gets also into the next topic.
I am announcing today that under the Trump administration, your government will pay for or your insurance company will be mandated to pay for all costs associated with IVF treatment.
We want more babies!
IVF means the creation of large numbers of embryos that are later killed, and in Catholic theology, IVF is regarded as a moral evil.
It's notable that Vance, who is a Catholic convert, has made some statements now generally supporting IVF as he runs towards Trump and away from his Faith.
2. Fiscal Responsibility?
Trump added 8T to the federal debt in his term in office.
And he proposed, prior to Harris, cutting income taxes on tips, which has no logical defense. Income is income.
Trump has stood for tax cuts, which have amounted to tax cuts for the wealthy. People, including the wealthy like Elon Musk, have noted the country is going bankrupt. Well, this is a big part of the reason why.
Back to the above, the GOP whined endlessly about Obamacare, and now proposes to expand government support for an insurance payment. What the crud?
3. Pro defense?
The Republican willingness in many quarters to abandon Ukraine says all you need to know about this. Added to it, Trump has a weird relationship with Russia that has never been explained.
Much of the current GOP wants to return to isolationism, which worked oh so well during the 1930s.
4. Tough on crime?
Running Trump says all you really need to know on that.
This party, in spite of what its supporters believe, stands only for reelecting Donald Trump, and nothing else.
Mind you, there were signs of this happening for some time. The entire spectacle of Evangelical Christians lashing themselves to the decks of the Trump serial polygamy ship was never easy to fathom. National Conservatives came on board in a calculated fashion, thinking that when Trump shuffled off his mortal coil they'd be in charge, only to see the less popular portions of their beliefs mocked and categorized as "weird". The Hawk Tuah girl was embraced by the Lynyrd Skynyrd branch of the populist whose Christianity is rather thin and not hardly of the Mike Johnson New Apostolic Reformation variety.
So what does that do to the populist movement in the GOP and the GOP in general? Well, quite a few real Republicans are abandoning ship, particularly those cultural conservatives who were never really Trumpites, but believed there was a moral obligation to support the GOP due to its cultural conservative positions. The American Solidarity Party is suddenly getting a lot of attention because its actually prolife. But a lot of the Trumpites now stand for nothing but Trump and will go down with him like stormtroopers in Berlin on May 2, 1945. Locally those politicians who have arisen in the Populist Freedom Caucus will keep on saying the same things they've been saying, even as their leader is saying the opposite.
Populism always gets co-opted in the end. Here, it already has been. Conservatism, for its part, was simply killed in the party.
Sunday, August 18, 2024
Wednesday, August 18, 1824. The Mexican General Colonization Law.
Colonist would be exempt from taxes for ten years.
Last edition:
Saturday, August 14, 1824. Return of Lafayette.
Thursday, June 27, 2024
The 2024 Election, Part XIX. The Clerks say "M'eh" edition.
June 6, 2024
Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray informed County Clerks that they may not use drop boxes in the upcoming election:
The County Clerks in turn met yesterday and informed Gray, that yes they can:
The topic of drop boxes has figured prominently in far right wing conspiracy theories even though there's no evidence whatsoever that they were involved in corruption in the last U.S. election, and certainly did not in the Wyoming election. Sec. Gray used 2000 Mules prominently in his campaign, which apparently focuses on them, with that film having been completely discredited. The conservative company which distributed it recently pulled it and apologized for it.
Apparently, less than 10 Wyoming counties actually use drop boxes, but the clerks en masse rejected Gray's directive. If he wants to actually enforce his view, he'll have to attempt to get a court order, which risks the embarrassing possibility of losing as well as making people mad that a state official is suing local clerks. If he doesn't take legal action, however, he'll look politically emasculated.
June 12, 2024
A bunch of states held primaries yesterday.
Nancy Mace held off a Republican challenger in South Carolina.
Trump backed Kelly Armstrong won in North Dakota.
June 14, 2024
And if this election wasn't weird enough:
Cheyenne City Clerk Says Artificial Intelligence Candidate For Mayor Is OK For Election
June 15, 2024
The Presidential election continues to get increasingly surreal.
Business executives who met with Trump recently, in some instances, came away a bit shocked by what is obvious. CBS reports that some:
“said that [Trump] was remarkably meandering, could not keep a straight thought [and] was all over the map,”
D'uh.
That's been the case for quite a while, and it's really showing. Consider this from last week:
I say, ‘What would happen if the boat sank from its weight and you’re in the boat and you have this tremendously powerful battery and the battery’s underwater, and there’s a shark that’s approximately 10 yards over there?’ By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately. Do you notice that? A lot of shark … I watched some guys justifying it today: ‘Well, they weren’t really that angry. They bit off the young lady’s leg because of the fact that they were not hungry, but they misunderstood who she was.’ These people are crazy.
Eh?
There's plenty of reason to be concerned that Trump is in some state of mental decline. These statements are certainly alarming, to say the least. At this point, moreover, it's being willfully blind to suggest that Joe Biden is mentally impaired and not suggest the same thing about Trump.
Trump suggested last week that he'd look at replacing the income tax with tariffs. That would throw the country into a Depression.
Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, himself no spring chicken, was photographed amongst Trump's Senatorial acolytes last week, and then giving him a birthday cake. Dr. Barrasso is just that, a physician, and there's no real reason to believe that he's a Trump fan, but that's the case for a lot of those photographed smiling at Trump, all of which is both sad and alarming.
June 17, 2024
A record-low number of Democrats will run for Wyoming’s Legislature this year
June 21, 2024
A Sixth Cent sales tax will be on the ballot in Natrona County.
June 25, 2024
An article on Hageman's primary challenger in the GOP:
Democrat-turned-Republican challenges Wyoming’s Harriet Hageman for U.S. House seat
Helling has a less than zero chance of unseating Hageman. What this item really reminded me of, however, is just how old these candidates are. Helling is an old lawyer. His bar admission date is 1981, which would make him about 70. Hageman's is 1989, which I knew which would make her about 61, old by historical standards although apparently arguably middle-aged now.
Barrasso is 71. Lummis is 69. John Hotz, who is running against Barrasso, has a bar admission date of 1978 which would make him about three years older than Helling. Seemingly the only younger candidate in the GOP race this primary is Rasner.
This isn't a comment on any of their politics, but rather their age. Helling is opposed to nuclear power, a very 1970ish view. With old people, come old views, quite often, even if they're repackaged as new ones.
June 26, 2024
Boebert won the GOP primary in her new district in Colorado.
Democratic member of "the Squad" Jamaal Bowman lost his primary race in New York to moderate Democrat George Latimer.
June 27, 2024
Trump-endorsed Riverton Utah Mayor Trent Staggs lost the Republican primary to Representative John Curtis for the Senate seat being vacated by Mitt Romney. Trump-backed state Colorado GOP Chairman Dave Williams lost the primary to Jeff Crank. Trump's endorsed South Carolina 3rd Congressional District, candidate pastor Mark Burns, lost to nurse practitioner Sheri Biggs.
Trump endorsed Gabe Evans, defeated Janak Joshi for the Colorado's 8th Congressional District nomination.
Related threads:
Is anyone else reminded of the Simpson's?
Last prior edition:
The 2024 Election, Part XVIII. The list.
Tuesday, May 28, 2024
Going to the hardware store. A note on taxes.
Socialism is when the government does stuff. And it's more socialism the more stuff it does. And if it does a real lot of stuff, it's communism.
Richard D. Wolff.1
I saw them there when I went into the hardware store, but they were talking to somebody and I didn't have to engage them. I was not so lucky on the way out. I glanced over as there oddly enough were cookies at the table and I thought for a moment it might be an effort to raise money for something like the Girl Scouts, but there were no girls there. Only two women, whom I'd guess were in their 70s.
Them: Excuse me sir, are you a registered voter?
I'll be frank, I really hate the initiative and referendum process. I figure most people sign the petitions to get something on the ballot, as they are polite and don't really want to offend the signature takers. Eons ago, I was like that myself.
I've long since being that way. Most of the time I refuse to sign the petitions, but I don't engage the petitioners in debate.
And I didn't this time. I wish I had.
The rest of the brief conversation:
Me: Yes (said in an irritated tone).
Them: Would you like to sign our petition? If passed, it would drop property taxes 50%.
Me: No (said in an even more irritated tone).
By the time I got home, I was irritated with myself. I wish I had engaged them in conversation. If I had, what I would have said is this?
Oh? Property taxes in Wyoming, which has no income tax, pay for police, fire departments, basic city sevices and education. Why do you hate policemen, firemen and teachers?
That's brutal, but that's the truth. If we don't tax property for these things, we have to tax something else, or go without.
This city has had two reported teenage murders in the last month, and a lot of killings here just go unreported. We have a developing violent gang problem. I'm not even going to bother with the drug problem that comes with living in a city that's on an Interstate Highway. We have a homeless problem due to other municipalities busing their homeless to our city. All of these ties right into what I just noted.
Badly educated people are a major social problem that ends up being a burden on emergency services.
The "I don't want to be taxed" movement really came about, no matter how it is thinly intellectually justified, as property taxes have risen significantly in the state in recent years. The reasons are several fold, one simply being that county assessors falsely suppressed raising them, as property values raised, as they're elected officers and they were chicken about it. The State, which has the duty to distribute the taxes, finally got after them to do t heir jobs, and they've been having to do them. That's raised taxes.
Another is that a certain attitude in the state has encouraged people to move in, although a large number move right back out. Those who move in are largely older, having made their lives elsewhere, and having educated their children elsewhere. They sold their houses high in those places, where they should have stayed, and don't want to pay for anything here. Additionally, a lot of these people have real populist views, and would be just fine with not educating anyone in their declining years as they'll be dead as a door nail when current children become ignorant voters themselves.
For that matter, some of the recent imports have washed up from regions where education in particular is lacking. This is particularly the case for people who have come up from the South. Steeped in a sort of ignorance themselves, they aren't thinking things through, and regard education as some sort of left wing conspiracy. This has unfortunately seeped into American conservatism itself, and is now sort of a rallying cry.
Property taxes are rising just because of people like this. They sell out their homes for a pile, and then come here and buy new ones at inflated prices.
I'd really like to know what these people would propose to cut, if we didn't have the property taxes. They likely have no idea. The same people who would cut property taxes would go to a city council meeting and complain about a pothole, which is filled, basically, with money from property taxes.
Property taxes are, moreover, more fair than people suppose. If you have property, you have means. It's telling that these complaints come from old people, not young couples. Renters aren't paying property taxes. And if the property taxes are too high, it may mean you exceeded your means, or you have multiple properties. In the latter case, sell one, that will reduce property values and help distribute the scarce resource.
Footnotes.
1. A relative of mine uses this quote frequently, which is where I heard the first part of it.
I looked Wolff up, and he is an academic Marxist, which I'm not in any sense. Marxism is proven murderous crap. But the quote is not without merit. Every democratic society has governments which do a lot of stuff, and by and large the public really likes the stuff it does if it benefits from it, and doesn't if somebody else does. Some of the most subsidized industries in the US completely fail to realize that and their members loudly complain about the government. Trucking is, for example, a prime example.
Monday, April 1, 2024
The 2024 Wyoming Legislative Session. Part 7. After the Party II
Frankly, this was completely inappropriate for the holder of an elective office whose tasks are mostly ministerial.
Blog Mirror: Science in Pre-school
It also demonstrates the Populist use of the word "elite" as a slur, which in fact, it is not.
Science in Pre-school
The WEA efforts against Populist Ward seem unique as they've also purchased a web expression on the Trib's site, so they're seeking maximum coverage against the recent Illinois import.
Saturday, March 30, 2024
Tuesday, March 30, 1824. Tariffs and Resettlement.
On this day, Henry Clay argued for a protective tariff and in support of the American System in the House.
James Monroe argued on the same day, before Congress, for the resettlement of Native Americans on the Western Frontier, with the thought being they could continue their way of life there.
Last Prior Edition:
Thursday, March 25, 1824. Banning open carry
Sunday, March 17, 2024
Thursday, March 17, 1774The Lyme Tea Party
Boston 1775: The Lyme Tea Party: Yesterday I suggested that when young people in Lyme, Connecticut , celebrated Independence Day in 1805 by toasting “The Tea Party,” they d...
Friday, March 1, 2024
The 2024 Wyoming Legislative Session. Part 4. Oedant Arma Toga.
February 26, 2024
The start of week three.
February 27, 2024
Given the huge differences between the House and Senate versions of the budget, a special session is being discussed.
The legislature just passed the halfway mark last Friday.
The much talked about tax restructuring House Bill 203 was heavily amended yesterday so that the $1,000,0000 home value exemption was dropped to $200,000 and the sales tax from 2% to 1%, effectively eliminating the real structure of the bill.
I earlier predicted it would die, and this is, unfortunately, a new bill. It'll still die, but for the overwhelming majority of Wyomingites, all this would do is create a new tax. Changing the $1,000,000 to, perhaps, $500,000 would have made sense, but probably most Wyoming homes now have a $200,000 value.
The Senate passed SF 105 which bans credit card tracking of firearms purchased, a totally non-existent problem that even an interview from a local sporting goods store was baffled about.
February 27, cont:
Not really legislative, but:
Governor Gordon Issues Line-Item Vetoes to Secretary of State’s ESG Investing Rules
CHEYENNE, Wyo. – After careful review of a rules package proposed by Secretary of State Chuck Gray on Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) investment disclosure and consent, Governor Mark Gordon has determined that parts of the rules go beyond the Secretary’s legal authority. As a result the Governor issued line item-vetoes of portions of the rules.
The Governor has long-opposed any artificial implementation of ESG factors in investment strategies.
“While I agree that ESG investment guidance is improper and misleading, the answer to too much government interference in our lives is not more government,” Governor Gordon said. “No government should have the right to direct people’s personal investment strategies.”
In a letter sent to Secretary Gray, Governor Gordon notes that by law he can only approve rules within the bounds set by statute. In the case of the proposed rules addressing ESG investing, the statute does not allow the government to tell individuals how they must invest their dollars. The consumer protection required by Wyoming and federal law speaks to transparency and disclosure only. Informed consumers should have the freedom to make their own investment choices.
“To be clear, I agree with your efforts to better illuminate investment practice and strategy through disclosure. Properly informed investors are always better able to make good decisions for themselves,” Governor Gordon wrote.
“Our appetite to oppose radical and misguided ESG initiatives in Wyoming does not justify implementing rules beyond the scope of statutory authority or interfering in the personal investment choices of Wyoming citizens. Personal responsibility and liberty are sacred principles that are all too often usurped by government mandate,” he added.
In the letter, the Governor also noted that federal securities laws expressly prohibit state conflicts “in the regulation of (1) federally covered securities, (2) broker dealers, (3) federally covered investment advisors, (4) investment advisor representatives, and (5) securities agents.”
The Governor’s letter to the Secretary of State may be viewed here. A copy of the Governor’s line-item vetoes can be found here.
And:
Secretary Gray Expresses Disappointment in Governor's Line-Item Veto of Rules to Protect Investors from ESG Investments through Increased Disclosure; Secretary Gray Reiterates Need to Protect Investors from Radical ESG Investments
CHEYENNE, WY – On February 27, 2024, Governor Mark Gordon line-item vetoed amendments to Chapters 2, 4, 5, and 10 of the Wyoming Secretary of State’s Securities Rules, which required disclosure and consent to Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) investment strategies by requiring investment advisers, broker-dealers, and securities agents to disclose to their customers or clients whether they are incorporating a social objective, i.e. whether they are considering social criteria, in the investment or commitment of customer or client funds, and obtain their consent. Following the Governor’s line-item veto, the rules limit the definition of a social objective, and will require written disclosure for some ESG-related investments, but will not require customer or client consent.
“I am disappointed in and disagree with Governor Gordon’s decision to line-item veto key portions of our proposed Securities Rules,” Secretary of State Chuck Gray said in a statement. “From the beginning of this rulemaking, we addressed concerns raised by Governor Gordon. We underwent a thorough public comment period, and fully considered all feedback received. As I wrote previously in my letter dated July 19, 2024, and again in my letter dated January 16, 2024, the Wyoming Uniform Securities Act clearly allows Wyoming to protect customers and clients from the harmful effects of ESG investments. I am disappointed to see the Governor’s rationale has adopted the recycled talking points of the radical left and Wall Street elites, rather than sound legal arguments. We must take concrete, proactive action to protect our state and consumers from the dangers presented by ESG investments maliciously targeting our core industries.”
“Although the Governor’s line-item veto weakened the amount of protections we attempted to provide to customers and clients to protect them from the dangers of ESG investment strategies, I believe the final rules offer a necessary starting point to protect Wyomingites from social ideologues imposing their radical, clown-show agenda on our state.”
Cont:
Passed Senate, on to House:
SENATE FILE NO. SF0094
An act regarding compelled speech and state employers.
Sponsored by: Senator(s) Hutchings, French and Ide and Representative(s) Styvar and Ward
A BILL
for
AN ACT relating to the administration of government; prohibiting the state and its political subdivisions from compelling speech as specified; authorizing a civil remedy; providing an exception to the Wyoming governmental claims act; and providing for an effective date.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:
Section 1. W.S. 9‑14‑301 is created to read:
ARTICLE 3
COMPELLED OR PROHIBITED SPEECH
9‑14‑301. Compelled speech; civil action.
(a) The state and its political subdivisions shall not compel or require an employee to refer to another employee using that employee's preferred pronouns:
(i) As a condition of continuing or commencing employment or contracting with the state or a political subdivision;
(ii) As a condition to receive a grant, contract, license or other benefit afforded by the state or a political subdivision; or
(iii) Under threat of adverse action by the state or a political subdivision, including but not limited to an adverse employment action, exclusion, sanction or punishment.
(b) Any person aggrieved by a violation of subsection (a) of this section may file a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction against the state or any political subdivision, and its employees acting in their official capacities, responsible for the violation to recover appropriate relief, including injunctive or declaratory relief, compensatory damages, reasonable attorney fees and court costs.
Section 2. W.S. 1‑39‑104(a) is amended to read:
1‑39‑104. Granting immunity from tort liability; liability on contracts; exceptions.
(a) A governmental entity and its public employees while acting within the scope of duties are granted immunity from liability for any tort except as provided by W.S. 1‑39‑105 through 1‑39‑112 and 9‑14‑301. Any immunity in actions based on a contract entered into by a governmental entity is waived except to the extent provided by the contract if the contract was within the powers granted to the entity and was properly executed and except as provided in W.S. 1‑39‑120(b). The claims procedures of W.S. 1‑39‑113 apply to contractual claims against governmental entities.
Section 3. This act applies to civil causes of action that are initiated on or after the effective date of this act.
Section 4. This act is effective July 1, 2024.
Passed House, on to Senate, and totally ineffectual due to the Supremacy Clause:
HOUSE BILL NO. HB0036
Natural Resource Protection Act.
Sponsored by: Select Federal Natural Resource Management Committee
A BILL
for
AN ACT relating to protection of constitutional rights; providing a declaration of authority and policy; prohibiting the enforcement of federal rules or regulations regarding federal land management as specified; providing an exception; and providing for an effective date.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:
Section 1. W.S. 9‑14‑301 through 9‑14‑303 are created to read:
ARTICLE 3
NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION ACT
9‑14‑301. Short title.
This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Natural Resource Protection Act."
9‑14‑302. Declaration of authority and policy.
(a) The Natural Resource Protection Act is enacted under the authority of the tenth amendment to the United States constitution and Wyoming's agreement with the United States that the state adopted when it joined the union under the United States constitution's system of dual sovereignty.
(b) The legislature finds and declares:
(i) The federal government shall comply with federal law when administering federal lands;
(ii) The federal government arbitrarily restricting significant amounts of federal lands from public use is contrary to managing federal land under principles of multiple use and sustained yield;
(iii) Any failure by the federal government to abide by the law undermines the rule of law that is vital to our system of government.
9‑14‑303. Prohibiting the enforcement of federal regulation regarding federal land management; penalty.
(a) Upon a determination by the governor, with advice from the attorney general, that an executive order, final rule or regulation of the federal government does not comply with federal laws regarding federal land management and upon providing notice, this state and all political subdivisions of this state shall not use any personnel, funds appropriated by the legislature or any other source of funds that originate within the state of Wyoming to enforce or administer that federal executive order, final rule or regulation. The governor shall not revoke a valid primacy agreement with a federal agency over the regulation and enforcement of a federal law or program until a court of competent jurisdiction determines the federal executive order, final rule or regulation is unlawful.
(b) Nothing in this act shall limit or restrict a public officer, as defined by W.S. 6‑5‑101(a)(v), from providing assistance to federal authorities for purposes not specifically identified in subsection (a) of this section. Nothing in this act shall be construed to prohibit any governmental entity from accepting federal funds for law enforcement purposes.
Section 2. This act is effective July 1, 2024.
February 28, 2024
The Joint Conference Committee was picked to work out the $1B difference between the House and the Senate budgets. The members are Sens. Dave Kinskey, R-Sheridan, Tim Salazar, R-Riverton, Sens. Anthony Bouchard, R-Cheyenne, Dan Laursen, R-Powell, and Troy McKeown, R-Gillette. Three of the members are extremely conservative.
This signals there's going to be a lot of cutting in the Senate version of the budget.
Chloe's law passed the Senate. The bill bans sexual mutilation of children, something that should simply be overall outright banned.
SENATE FILE NO. SF0099
Chloe's law-children gender change prohibition.
Sponsored by: Senator(s) Bouchard, Biteman, Boner, Brennan, Dockstader, French, Hicks, Hutchings, Ide, Kinskey, Kolb, Laursen, D, McKeown, Salazar and Steinmetz and Representative(s) Andrew, Davis, Heiner, Hornok, Jennings, Knapp, Locke, Neiman, Niemiec, Ottman, Pendergraft, Penn, Rodriguez-Williams, Slagle, Strock, Styvar, Trujillo and Winter
A BILL
for
AN ACT relating to public health and safety; prohibiting physicians from performing procedures for children related to gender transitioning and gender reassignment; providing an exception; providing that gender transitioning and reassignment procedures are grounds for suspension or revocation of a physician's or health care provider's license; providing definitions; specifying applicability; requiring rulemaking; and providing for effective dates.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:
Section 1. W.S. 35‑4‑1001 is created to read:
ARTICLE 10
GENDER‑RELATED PROCEDURES
35‑4‑1001. Gender transitioning and reassignment procedures for children prohibited.
(a) As used in this section:
(i) "Child" means a person who is younger than eighteen (18) years of age;
(ii) "Health care provider" means a person other than a physician who is licensed, certified or otherwise authorized by Wyoming law to provide or render health care or to dispense or prescribe a prescription drug in the ordinary course of business or practice of a profession;
(iii) "Physician" means any person licensed to practice medicine in this state by the state board of medicine under the Medical Practice Act.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section and for purposes of transitioning a child's biological sex as determined by the sex organs, chromosomes and endogenous profiles of the child or affirming the child's perception of the child's sex if that perception is inconsistent with the child's biological sex, no physician or health care provider shall:
(i) Perform a surgery that sterilizes the child, including castration, vasectomy, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, metoidioplasty, orchiectomy, penectomy, phalloplasty and vaginoplasty;
(ii) Perform a mastectomy;
(iii) Provide, administer, prescribe or dispense any of the following prescription drugs that induce transient or permanent infertility:
(A) Puberty suppression or blocking prescription drugs to stop or delay normal puberty;
(B) Supraphysiologic doses of testosterone to females;
(C) Supraphysiologic doses of estrogen to males.
(iv) Remove any otherwise healthy or nondiseased body part or tissue.
(c) This section shall not apply to:
(i) Procedures or treatments that are performed with the consent of the child's parent or guardian and are for a child who is born with a medically verifiable genetic disorder of sex development, including 46, XX chromosomes with virilization, 46, XY with undervirilization or both ovarian and testicular tissue;
(ii) Any procedure or treatment that is performed with the consent of the child's parent or guardian and is for a child with medically verifiable central precocious puberty.
Section 2. W.S. 33‑21‑146(a)(xi), (xii) and by creating a new paragraph (xiii), 33‑24‑122(a)(intro), (ix) and by creating a new paragraph (xi) and 33‑26‑402(a) by creating a new paragraph (xxxvi) are amended to read:
33‑21‑146. Disciplining licensees and certificate holders; grounds.
(a) The board of nursing may refuse to issue or renew, or may suspend or revoke the license, certificate or temporary permit of any person, or to otherwise discipline a licensee or certificate holder, upon proof that the person:
(xi) Has failed to submit to a mental, physical or medical competency examination following a proper request by the board made pursuant to board rules and regulations and the Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act; or
(xii) Has violated a previously entered board order;. or
(xiii) Has violated W.S. 35‑4‑1001.
33‑24‑122. Revocation or suspension of license and registration; letter of admonition; summary suspension; administrative penalties; probation; grounds.
(a) The license and registration of any pharmacist may be revoked or suspended by the board of pharmacy or the board may issue a letter of admonition, refuse to issue or renew any license or require successful completion of a rehabilitation program or issue a summary suspension for any one (1) or more of the following causes:
(ix) For senility or mental impairment which impedes the pharmacist's professional abilities or for habitual personal use of morphine, cocaine or other habit forming drugs or alcohol; or
(xi) For violating W.S. 35‑4‑1001.
33‑26‑402. Grounds for suspension; revocation; restriction; imposition of conditions; refusal to renew or other disciplinary action.
(a) The board may refuse to renew, and may revoke, suspend or restrict a license or take other disciplinary action, including the imposition of conditions or restrictions upon a license on one (1) or more of the following grounds:
(xxxvi) Violating W.S. 35‑4‑1001.
Section 3. W.S. 35‑4‑1001, as created by section 1 of this act, shall apply only to conduct or procedures occurring on and after the effective date of this act.
Section 4. The department of health, state board of medicine and state board of pharmacy shall promulgate all rules necessary to implement this act.
Section 5.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this act is effective July 1, 2024.
(b) Sections 4 and 5 of this act are effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.
The bill restructuring Wyoming's tax system died, as we predicted.
A bill eliminating gun free zones in Wyoming passed the House. My prediction is that it shall die in the Senate.
February 28, cont:
The Senate has voted to defund gender studies and the diversity office at the University of Wyoming. This is not a surprise,
Right wing populist Senator Bob Ide, on the action, stated:
I think we have a real opportunity to set University of Wyoming apart as a grassroots, traditional-value university.
This was done by way of a footnote in the budget, and it's far from certain that the footnote will survive budget resolution.
February 29, 2024
A bill to require abortion clinics to be licensed pass the House and is through a Senate committee. It provides:
HOUSE BILL NO. HB0148
Regulation of surgical abortions
Sponsored by: Representative(s) Lawley, Bear and Washut and Senator(s) Biteman, Boner, Brennan, Hutchings, Salazar and Steinmetz
A BILL
for
AN ACT relating to public health and safety; requiring the licensure of surgical abortion facilities as specified; requiring licensed physicians to perform abortions after an ultrasound; providing criminal penalties for violations; specifying civil liability for damages resulting from abortions; providing definitions; making conforming amendments; specifying applicability; requiring rulemaking; and providing for an effective date.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:
Section 1. W.S. 35‑6‑201 through 35‑6‑205 are created to read:
ARTICLE 2
REGULATION OF SURGICAL ABORTIONS
35‑6‑201. Definitions.
(a) As used in this article:
(i) "Abortion" means the act of using or prescribing any instrument, medicine, drug or any other substance, device or means with the intent to terminate the clinically diagnosable pregnancy of a woman, including the elimination of one (1) or more unborn babies in a multifetal pregnancy, with knowledge that the termination by those means will, with reasonable likelihood, cause the death of the unborn baby. "Abortion" shall not include any use, prescription or means specified in this paragraph if the use, prescription or means are done with the intent to:
(A) Save the life or preserve the health of the unborn baby;
(B) Remove a dead unborn baby caused by spontaneous abortion or intrauterine fetal demise;
(C) Treat a woman for an ectopic pregnancy; or
(D) Provide treatment for a pregnant woman when a medical procedure or treatment is necessary, based on reasonable medical judgment, to save or preserve the life of the pregnant woman.
(ii) "Hospital" means those institutions licensed by the Wyoming department of health as hospitals;
(iii) "Physician" means any person licensed to practice medicine in this state;
(iv) "Pregnancy" or "pregnant" means the human female reproductive condition of having a living unborn baby or human being within a human female's body throughout the entire embryonic and fetal stages of the unborn human being from fertilization to full gestation and childbirth;
(v) "Reasonable medical judgment" means a medical judgment that would be made or a medical action that would be undertaken by a reasonably prudent, qualified physician who is knowledgeable about the case and the treatment possibilities with respect to the medical conditions involved;
(vi) "Surgical abortion" means an induced abortion performed or attempted through use of a machine, medical device, surgical instrument or surgical tool, or any combination thereof, to terminate the clinically diagnosable pregnancy of a woman with knowledge and the intent that the termination by those means will cause, with reasonable likelihood, the death of the unborn child;
(vii) "Surgical abortion facility" means any facility, other than a hospital, that provides a surgical abortion to a woman and performs not less than three (3) first‑trimester surgical abortions in any one (1) month or not less than one (1) second‑trimester or third‑trimester surgical abortion in any one (1) year.
35‑6‑202. Surgical abortion facilities; licensure requirement; prohibitions; penalties.
(a) Each surgical abortion facility in Wyoming shall be licensed as an ambulatory surgical center in accordance with W.S. 35‑2‑901 through 35‑2‑914 and the rules of the department of health. Each surgical abortion facility performing surgical abortions shall have a separate license.
(b) No surgical abortion facility shall provide surgical abortions to any pregnant woman without first being licensed as an ambulatory surgical center.
(c) Each surgical abortion facility shall comply with all rules of the department of health concerning the operation and regulation of ambulatory surgical centers. No license issued to a surgical abortion facility shall be transferable or assignable to any other person or facility.
(d) Each licensed physician performing at least one (1) surgical abortion at a surgical abortion facility shall:
(i) Report each surgical abortion to the department of health and shall attest in the report that the physician is licensed and in good standing with the state board of medicine;
(ii) Submit documentation in a form and frequency required by the department of health that demonstrates that the licensed physician has admitting privileges at a hospital located not more than ten (10) miles from the abortion facility where the licensed physician is performing or will perform surgical abortions.
(e) Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). Each calendar day in which a violation of this section occurs or continues is a separate offense.
35‑6‑203. Abortion facilities; surgical abortions; requirements; rulemaking.
(a) Any surgical abortion performed at a surgical abortion facility in the state shall only be performed by a physician licensed in the state of Wyoming.
(b) Any person who performs in the state any surgical abortion at a surgical abortion facility in violation of subsection (a) of this section is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not less than one (1) year nor more than fourteen (14) years.
(c) No person shall perform a surgical abortion at a surgical abortion facility in Wyoming who is not a licensed physician with admitting privileges at a hospital located not more than ten (10) miles from the abortion facility where the surgical abortion is performed.
(d) Any person who violates subsection (c) of this section or if a pharmacist or physician violates W.S. 35‑6‑205 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000,00). For purposes of this subsection, each surgical abortion at a surgical abortion facility shall constitute a separate offense of subsection (c) of this section.
(e) The department of health shall promulgate rules necessary to regulate surgical abortion facilities as ambulatory surgical centers under W.S. 35‑2‑901 through 35‑2‑914, provided that the rules:
(i) Applicable to surgical abortion facilities are not less stringent than those rules applicable to ambulatory surgical centers;
(ii) Provide for the physical inspection of surgical abortion facilities by the department of health every three (3) years.
35‑6‑204. Applicability; effect.
If any provision of this article conflicts with the Life is a Human Right Act or W.S. 35‑6‑139, the provisions of the Life is a Human Right Act and W.S. 35‑6‑139 shall control over this article to the extent that the Life is a Human Right Act and W.S. 35‑6‑139 are enforceable.
35‑6‑205. Abortion facilities; licensure requirements verification; prohibitions; penalties.
Not less than forty‑eight (48) hours before a pregnant woman procures the drugs or substances for a chemical abortion, before a physician or pharmacist dispenses the drugs or substances necessary for a chemical abortion or before a pregnant woman undergoes a surgical abortion, the physician or pharmacist shall ensure that the pregnant woman receives an ultrasound in order to determine the gestational age of the unborn child, to determine the location of the pregnancy, to verify a viable intrauterine pregnancy and to provide the pregnant woman the opportunity to view the active ultrasound of the unborn child and hear the heartbeat of the unborn child if the heartbeat is audible. The provider of the ultrasound shall provide the pregnant woman with a document that specifies the date, time and place of the ultrasound.
Section 2. W.S. 35‑2‑901(a)(ii) is amended to read:
35‑2‑901. Definitions; applicability of provisions.
(a) As used in this act:
(ii) "Ambulatory surgical center" means a facility which provides surgical treatment to patients not requiring hospitalization and is not part of a hospital or offices of private physicians, dentists or podiatrists. "Ambulatory surgical center" shall include any surgical abortion facility as defined by W.S. 35‑6‑201(a)(vii);
Section 3.
(a) Nothing in this act shall be construed as creating an individual right to abortion.
(b) It is the intent of the legislature that this act shall not be construed as holding abortion as lawful in the state pending a decision from a court of competent jurisdiction on the current state of the law.
(c) It is the intent of the legislature that this act shall not recognize or define abortion as a health care decision under Article 1, section 38 of the Wyoming Constitution.
Section 4. The department of health shall promulgate all rules necessary to implement this act.
Section 5. This act is effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.
This may seem like an odd bill in that the legislature has outlawed abortion already, although the disposition of that law is in peril due to a poorly thought out paranoid Wyoming Constitutional amendment that was aimed at the fictional threat of Obamacare "death panels", a good example of paranoia in operation combined with the Law of Unintended Consequences. Those who backed that law should be ashamed of themselves. Anyhow, this bill seeks to regulate infanticide abattoirs if they're allowed to exist, and during the period in which the issue is pending in what seems like a glacially slow Teton County proceeding.
It might be questioned why no effort has been made to repeal the silly Obamacare Paranoia Amendment, but none has. Probably "They're Going To Make Me Vaccinate" paranoia has something to do with that.
March 1, 2024
A bill to relocate bighorn sheep from Sweetwater Rocks has gotten through a House Committee after passing the Senate. The measure is designed to protect domestic sheep.
SENATE FILE NO. SF0118
Bighorn and domestic sheep relocation-federal action.
Sponsored by: Senator(s) Hicks and Representative(s) Western
A BILL
for
AN ACT relating to wildlife and livestock; providing legislative findings; requiring the game and fish department to relocate or remove bighorn sheep from the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area in response to specified federal action; providing for the reimbursement of costs for relocation or removal of bighorn sheep; requiring and authorizing attorney general action as specified; amending the duties of the wildlife/livestock research partnership board; providing appropriations; and providing for an effective date.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:
Section 1. W.S. 11‑19‑605 is created to read:
11‑19‑605. Wyoming bighorn/domestic sheep relocation and removal; legislative findings; reimbursement; attorney general action.
(a) The legislature finds and declares that it is the state's policy to vigorously defend its interests in maintaining and enhancing viable livestock grazing operations on public lands in conjunction with the conservation and maintenance of healthy bighorn sheep populations in the state of Wyoming. These two (2) policies are mutually compatible as demonstrated since the adoption of the collaboratively developed Wyoming bighorn/domestic sheep plan in 2004, which was codified into law under W.S. 11‑19‑604 in 2015. The legislature further finds and declares that:
(i) Reintroduction of bighorn sheep and management action to protect existing populations of bighorn sheep on federal public lands has been effectively accomplished in conformance with the Wyoming bighorn/domestic sheep plan;
(ii) All wildlife in the state of Wyoming is the property of the state, and it is the policy of the state to provide an adequate and flexible system for control, propagation, management, protection and regulation of all Wyoming wildlife;
(iii) Any removal of bighorn sheep from the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area under this act shall not be attributable to domestic livestock grazing on federal bureau of land management administered lands. Rather, the removal of bighorn sheep shall be directly attributable to:
(A) Onerous federal regulation that unduly impedes the state of Wyoming's ability to manage wildlife and domestic livestock grazing in conformance with the Wyoming bighorn/domestic sheep plan;
(B) Third‑party litigation designed to use bighorn sheep as a means of eliminating domestic livestock grazing on bureau of land management administered lands in and adjacent to the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area.
(iv) The provisions of this section shall be enforced by the state.
(b) In conformance with the Wyoming bighorn/domestic sheep plan in W.S. 11‑19‑604 and pursuant to W.S. 23‑1‑103, the game and fish department shall relocate or remove bighorn sheep from the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area if any federal judicial action or federal agency action requires or could require the following:
(i) The elimination or suspension of domestic sheep grazing or trailing; or
(ii) Any changes to a United States bureau of land management resource management plan, grazing allotments or livestock grazing agreements due to the presence of bighorn sheep in the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area or any adjacent grazing allotment that is not in a designated bighorn sheep herd unit after July 1, 2024 without the consent of the grazing permittee.
(c) Any relocation or removal of bighorn sheep from the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area required by subsection (b) of this section shall commence as soon as practicable but not later than six (6) months after the Wyoming department of agriculture certifies to the governor that a condition specified in subsection (b) of this section is met. The governor shall notify the game and fish department that the removal of bighorn sheep from the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area shall commence in accordance with this section.
(d) The game and fish department shall be responsible for the expedient removal of bighorn sheep that stray outside the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area if that straying or foray is not into another designated herd unit.
(e) The state and its agencies shall coordinate and assist the Wyoming congressional delegation in pursuing changes to federal law, rules and policies in order to bring them into conformance with the Wyoming bighorn/domestic sheep plan created under W.S. 11‑19‑604.
(f) The Wyoming game and fish department shall not seek to change, alter or otherwise affect changes to domestic livestock grazing authorization on public and state lands due to the presence of bighorn sheep in the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area or adjacent grazing allotments that are not within an existing bighorn sheep herd unit.
(g) The game and fish department shall be reimbursed for the costs of relocation or removal of bighorn sheep pursuant to subsection (b) of this section from any available funds in the wildlife/livestock disease research partnership account created by W.S. 11‑19‑603.
(h) With the approval of the governor, the attorney general shall seek to intervene in any lawsuit if a federal action is contrary to the state's policy regarding Wyoming bighorn/domestic sheep set forth in subsection (a) of this section or that is inconsistent with the Wyoming bighorn/domestic sheep plan.
(j) With the approval of the governor, the attorney general shall file an action against any federal agency to stop the enforcement, administration or implementation of any federal agency rule, instructional memo, handbook or other action taken by a federal agency if the rule, instructional memo, handbook or other action is contrary to the Wyoming bighorn/domestic sheep plan or is otherwise contrary to law.
Section 2. W.S. 11‑19‑602(b) by creating a new paragraph (vii) and 11‑19‑603 are amended to read:
11‑19‑602. Wyoming wildlife/livestock disease research partnership board created; membership; duties; purposes.
(b) The board shall:
(vii) Allocate funds for monitoring, tracking and conducting disease surveillance before and following the introduction of bighorn sheep in the Sweetwater Rocks cooperative review area.
11‑19‑603. Account created.
There is created a wildlife/livestock disease research partnership account. Funds from this account shall be used only for purposes specified in W.S. 11‑19‑601 through 11‑19‑604 11‑19‑605. Any interest earned on the account shall remain within the account.
Section 3.
(a) There is appropriated one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) from the general fund to the wildlife/livestock disease research partnership account for purposes of reimbursing the game and fish department for the costs of relocation or removal of bighorn sheep under this act. This appropriation shall be for the period beginning with the effective date of this act and ending June 30, 2030. This appropriation shall not be transferred or expended for any other purpose. Notwithstanding W.S. 9‑2‑1008, 9‑2‑1012(e) and 9‑4‑207, this appropriation shall not revert until June 30, 2030.
(b) There is appropriated fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) from the general fund to the department of agriculture for the rangeland health assessment program to conduct rangeland monitoring of the United States bureau of land management grazing allotments in or adjacent to the Sweetwater Rocks bighorn sheep cooperative review area. This appropriation shall be for the period beginning with the effective date of this act and ending June 30, 2030. This appropriation shall not be transferred or expended for any other purpose. Notwithstanding W.S. 9‑2‑1008, 9‑2‑1012(e) and 9‑4‑207, this appropriation shall not revert until June 30, 2030.
Section 4. This act is effective July 1, 2024.
The area is near Agate Flats in Fremont County.
March 1, cont:
Governor Gordon Signs First Bills of 2024 Legislative Session
CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Governor Mark Gordon signed the first bills of the 2024 Legislative session at the Capitol today.
The first bill to be signed by the Governor was Senate File 0004 Rehiring retired firefighters-continued retirement benefits. Sponsored by the Joint Labor, Health and Social Services committee, the bill allows retired firefighters to be rehired while continuing to receive retirement benefits, including a pension.
The Governor signed the following bills into law today:
Enrolled Act # Bill No. Bill Title
SEA0001 SF0017 Plane coordinates system-amendments.
SEA0002 SF0015 Acceptance of retrocession-federal military installations.
SEA0003 SF0004 Rehiring retired firefighters-continued retirement benefits.
Last Prior Edition: