Showing posts with label Commentary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Commentary. Show all posts

Monday, July 27, 2026

Lex Anteinternet: Donald Trump. Flagellum Dei? Can anything good come out of Donald Trump's Dictatorship?

Quite a while back we ran this: 

Lex Anteinternet: Donald Trump. Flagellum Dei?: A man who has conquered others, should conquer himself Pope Leo the Great to Atilla the Hun.  He never did.  He died following drinking too ...

Which essentially raises and addresses the same topic.  

When I first went to post this topic, I was going to limit it to the war, and the war will be principally what this addresses. But in thinking about it, the question is a bit broader than that.

Much broader.

Going to war, however, war is one of the worst evils that nations impose upon each other.  They invoke the worst of human suffering and bring about the worst human behavior.  The worst human abuse, or at least one of the very worst,  homicide, is the very essence of war.  Wars inflict death. Death upon combatants, but death upon the wholly innocent.  And not only death by armed military violence, but also by accident and starvation.  That alone makes war a horror.

But the horrors of war are not limited to death.  No war has ever been fought that did not visit rape upon women.  Not one single one.  Wars are fought mostly by men, and mostly by young men.  Men are taught to hate the enemy and dehumanize them.  Sooner or later, some of them become wartime rapist.  This is true in every single war, some wars more than others, and in every single army.  Logic holds that if you can teach men to kill, you will have some break the bounds of any decency.

Wars also involve theft on an epic scale.  Western armies have, for many years, banned looting by soldiers but it happens anyhow . Beyond that, wars sanction state theft to at least some degree.

Indeed, war simply visits mass immorality on the cultures that fight, and the location of the fighting.  I was listening to We Have Ways, the excellent British podcast on World War Two, the other day (I'm still in the early episodes of the podcast) when a general question episode came up, and one of the topics that was addressed was the wide scale licensing of prostitution.  Both the Germans and the British not only tolerated prostitution, but they basically organized and licensed it on a the basis that they needed to in order to address the health concerns it gave rise to. In Amsterdam there were enormous lines to brothels after it was liberated.  We've already touched on this in regard to the Japanese government, post occupation, creating brothels specifically for U.S. servicemen.  We've often touched upon the post 1953 decay of American morality in this area which gave rise to porongoraphy and the Sexual Revolution and wondered if it was tied to World War Two. Well, here's more evidence that it very much was.

The Trump interregnum likes to pretend that this war started 47 years ago, which is a complete fable  But the precursor to it, the Hamas attack on Israel, brought rise to it directly.  And that attack featured murder and rape right from the onset, by Hamas.  The Israeli response brought about mass homicide.  Now we're fighting Iran, for Israel, with Iran having been involved in the Hamas Israeli War. There's no reason at all to sympathize with Iran.  That doesn't amount to, however, sympathizing with everything Israel did, including what amounted to genocide in Gaza, and getting the United States into a regional war with Iran.

We don't really know where this will all end, but we can predict a lot of it with some certainty.  One certainty is that a war launched with an erroneous belief that it would start an internal revolution badly miscalculated that, and it won't result in one. Iran may have lost what little air force it had and what pathetic navy it had, but it's not defeated.  It's a land power to start with.  The US is going to have to go into Iran on the ground, which Israel will not do.  So we're going to fight a ground war in Iran for Israel.  Moreover, that war will not be a series of raids.  It'll be a real ground war and it will last, first as a conventional war and then as a guerilla war, for years.

Wars change everything.

And that's not all this incredibly corrupt administration is visiting upon us.

This summer provides plenty of proof, as if it was needed, that we're in a climate emergency, and yet Donald Trump grins and smiles as he guts alternative energy projects, and people like Harriet Hageman watch their family homestead burn and still refuse to acknowledge reality.  Money is flying into the pockets of the Trump family and his associates with nobody really questioning it yet.  The status of women as coequals in humanity is retreating as a creepy octogenarian comments on them openly in press meetings while keeping the perpetrators of rape at Epstein Island potentially secret.

Things are bad.

Catholic theology addresses the problem of evil with the partial answer that we know that God will not allow an evil to occur unless a greater good can come out of it. That does not mean that God sanctions the war, but rather that when humans cause such evils, God doesn't arrest our behavior if a greater good can come out of it.

Can a greater good come out of this?

I think a series of them can.

First and foremost, this war is achieving right now an acceleration of something generations of environmentalist have striven for  By boosting the price of petroleum to epic levels, which stands to get worse, it will reduce the consumption of it, and it will accelerate the conversion of energy generation to renewable green sources.  The US was a leader in this until troglodytes and reactionaries insisted that global warming was a fib and longed for the giant car era of the 1950s.  Well, Trump has killed that, and probably forever.  

Nations that were going to renewable energy are nearly gloating about it now  Those that trailed behind, save for the United States where the MAGA troglodytes are in control, are now rushing towards it, knowing that something Trump has said, that the prices will go right back down, is either a lie or amazingly ignorant.

Petroleum prices will not go back down for a generation.  An oil and gas infrastructure that took three generations to build cannot and will not be rebuilt overnight.  Moreover, the destruction of it, which is already disastrous, will get worse as the war goes on.  It took all the way into the mid 1960s to rebuilt Europe after World War Two.  This will be no different.

Moreover, the US doesn't have the money to do it.  A good that may come out of this war is that the drunk sailor/roaring 20s level of spending the US has engaged in will now come crashing to an end.  Nations like China that have funded it are stopping.  By 2027 the US will be forced into a financial reconciliation that Trump pretended he was going to bring, but which he lied about, along with everything else  We will have to get our financial house in order.

As part of that, this war is very likely to be the end of a bloated military that has become partially rogue.  Before Trump II Americans could always depend on the loyalty of the military to its laws.  It can't now . The military has engaged in two fully illegal wars with far right Evangelicalism being prominent in the military in the current one  

This war is going to be so big that the nation will have to call up the National Guard and Reserves to fight it.  We've had to do that for every war since Vietnam.  After the Vietnam War the military was held in contempt, even though it had done nothing to deserve it.  This time, it will be again, but it will deserve it. The contempt will go right into the Guard and Reserves.  The nation's ability to engage in these foreign "adventures" will be reduced because the nation will have a very low ability to fill the ranks of the forces necessary to do it, and on top of it, we just won't have the money.  Our military will start fitting in with those of our European allies, smaller, professional, and regional.  We'll need to depend on our Allies just to defend ourselves, and all of that will be a good thing.

The Trump interregnum has seen the nation, moreover, completely betrayed by the capitalist class.  Donald; Trump, Elon Musk, and a host of the rich and powerful have not been there for you and that's finally obvious.  Indeled, we learned, as we should have known, that the avarice of greed would turn, in many instances, to avaricious lust, with some of the rich and powerful flying offshore to fuck teenage girls.  Rather than bring them to justice, Trump has hid their names.  And, frankly, at this point, in spite of what Trump's supporters claim,there's plenty of evidence that he may have fucked teenage girls himself, and its pretty hard to believe he didn't know about that going on even if he didn't.  So we learned that not only are the rich and powerful detrimental to our economic welfare, they're detrimental to our environmental welfare, and even detrimental to the security of our daughters.  With the bloom off the rose of the worship of the rich, and after watching the nation fast forward into economic ruin, there's some rational hope that the rich will be brought to heel by having their wealth significantly reduced.

And then there's the weirdness of the far right Evangelicals.  The Trump Administration is likely to bring that to an end, and it needs to end.

Various members of the Administration, most notably J. D. Vance but also including Marco Rubio, have lectured Europe on it losing its culture, by which they mean, if they will not openly state it, it's Christian culture.  There's some reason to make that criticism, but it cannot really be made by a country governed by an authoritarian serial polygamist assisted by a Speaker of the House whose sympathetic to the New Apostolic Reformation and in which Paula White is a spiritual advisor.  The crash of the Trump administration, and it will crash, will bring the NAR down with, and most likely damage the Evangelical Right beyond repair.

Every time the world in general has faced an existential threat since the dawn of Christianity, if not before, there have been those who concluded that the world itself was ending.  There are those who have concluded that right now.  There are those who seriously wonder if Donald Trump is the Antichrist.  Peter Theil, the billionaire Evangelical (and homosexual) had oddly found a voice in First Things expressing the view that the Apocalypse is here citing much of what I just did.

Is it? 

Well, who knows.  But what we do know is that every age that featured such crises brought that view about.  Christians during Attila's day though the end had arrived, and for some, on a very persona level, it had.  When the Vikings started raiding European coastlines many presumed the same thing.  By the 1970s Hal Lindsey was scaring people with The Late Great Planet Earth.

What we also know is that true moments of crisis can be transformative.  Europe, once it became the center of Christianity, has wandered away from the Church repeatedly, with the Protestant Reformation being only one such example.

Already a huge portion of Americans are disillusioned and disgusted.  This can be seen socially, culturally and politically.  Most Sundays now I can hardly find a seat at Mass and confession lines are like what I used to only see at Easter.  Here in "Red" Wyoming, there's a significant movement to take the Wyoming Freedom Caucus out of office.  The Democrats appear slated to regain the House, and maybe the Senate, in November, to no doubt be followed by a Custer like last stand by Trump in the Oval Office in which he refused to recognize the game is up.  Republicans, and some Democrats, are fretting about the small-scale rise of Social Democrats, but capitalism is being allowed to run roughshod over average people and needs to be restrained, and certain "social" policies present everywhere else on Earth are long overdue here, such as "socialized" medicine.  And fascism always gives rise to the opponent of socialism, and the GOP has turned largely fascist.

All of this is to suggest maybe some good will come out of this.

 Tragic Prelude, a mural in the Kansas State Capitol. Brown carries in one hand a Bible and a rifle in the other.  Union and Confederate troops are fighting and dying in the background and foreground.  Tornadoes and a prairie fire approach. An era, really, not unlike our own.

In some ways, the first Trump administration was the opening campaign of a second Civil War, this one a Cold Civil War, by the same forces that brought about the first in 1860-65.  The nation's great failure after winning that war was to pass on extremely severely punishing those who brought it about, the slave owning oligarchs of the South.  That opportunity is going to present itself here a second time, in very short order.

The first time caused legal reforms to the Constitution. This one needs to as well.

The first one, perhaps ironically, also caused a major religious shift in the county and brought about the downfall of the southern Episcopal Church.  This one needs to bring about the downfall of far right Evangelicalism, and probably will. The Episcopal Church in the South fell of its own accord for supporting the Confederacy.  The NAR will fall for helping bring about and advancing Trump.

The United States is a conservative nation, mixed with classical liberal aspirations.  That will reflect what comes next, and we need to return to that.

Saturday, July 4, 2026

Saturday,July 4, 2026. What I intend to do (or not) for the 250th Anniversary of the U.S. Declaration of Independence. The Betrayal of the Revolution.

Protest by non observance, that's what I intend to do.

Or it's what I intended to do.

My attitude, which is quite pronounced on this, is already getting me in some trouble around the house, but I won't be "that guy" who has to answer why they didn't do anything at all when a tyrant was on the rise.

Everyone always imagines themselves on the side of right.  "If I'd lived in Nazi Germany, I wouldn't have gone along. . ."  Well, bull.  If recent history has shown us anything, it's that people will continue to travel along a path well after its obvious that they're being lead by a disaster.  People stampeded into voting for the NSDAP in 1932 were still supporting them in 1936, and if disquieted by September 1939, they went along still.

That's exactly what's going on now.  Trump's administration is authoritarian to the core and has people in it who hold shockingly racist views.  Just this past week there were cries to sterilize foreigners if they entered the US.

"Oh, they don't really mean that. . .they won't execute the Jews".

When the United States declared independence 250 years ago, it claimed, amongst its justifications, the following:

  • He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
Trump has done this.
  • He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
Trump has done this.
  • He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
Trump has effectively done this.
  • He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our People, and eat out their substance.
Trump has done this, in the form of DOGE and ICE.
  • He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislature.
Trump has done this, in the form of ICE.
  • He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
Trump again has attempted to do this.
  • He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
Executive orders, anyone?
  • For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
ICE and deployments of the National Guard.
  • For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
Trump is effectively attempting this.
  • He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
January 6?

Trump has always been a completely illegitimate President, although nobody has bothered to challenge this at law.  Insurrectionist, which he is, are not allowed to serve in the office, and it has never previously been the case that those known to be insurrectionist are required to be proven such at law.  As he is an illegal occupant, he has no actual authority, other than what negligence affords him.

And that has been done on a vast scale.  He's take the country all the way into a war in the Middle East he cannot win, and which Americans are going to pay the price for, for years.

Freedom wasn't taken from the American people.  They surrendered it to a demented oligarch.  They did it through their votes, and their not bothering to vote.  This is going to get much worse before it gets better.  Some of the damage will be permanent, but it may also be the case that necessary reforms will come about.

More than anything, this betrayal of the founding principals of the nation has come about due to the abject cowardice of the American people.  People know this is wrong, but they aren't willing to say anything to anyone about it.

A cowardly people doesn't honor their brave ancestors by setting off fireworks.  In this case, those people would be best honored by turning their backs to a celebration which King Donald has tried to make all about himself.  Indeed, at last, their starting too.  The large "state fair" King Donald admiration fest is being ignored.

The entire Fourth of July should be ignored this year.  The nation dishonors the Revolution by attempting to celebrate it with an increasingly fascistic would be monarch in office.

Other folks noting the same thing:


Also, I read in article in the Washington Post that a fairly percentage of people like me who can remember the Bicentennial are sitting this one out, upset about the country falling into fascism.  

***



But a fairly high percentage will also likely find, like me, that family celebrations and whatnot will likely intervene.  

We'll have to be careful.

Honest, but careful.

***
Pope Leo addressed the United States, his home nation, yesterday.

ADDRESS OF HIS HOLINESS POPE LEO XIV
ACCEPTANCE OF THE LIBERTY MEDAL OF
THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER (USA)

Friday, 3 July 2026

Dear friends,
I am honored to accept the Liberty Medal of the National Constitution Center in this year that marks the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America with the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. On the eve of this momentous occasion, I offer a warm greeting to all those assembled at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. As a son of this great country, founded by courageous men and women who dreamed of liberty and of a better life for themselves and for their children, I join you in asking God’s blessings upon America’s future, that the lofty ideals enshrined at the beginning of the Declaration of Independence may continue to guide the flourishing of the nation in unity, justice and peace.

From our youth, most of us have admired the eloquence of those words, with their resounding appeal to the law of nature and to nature’s God as the basis of their assertion that all men and women are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. While couched in the language of the Enlightenment, that claim is ultimately grounded in an understanding of the human person inspired by the great biblical vision of man and woman being created in the divine image. It is indeed here that we discover the basis of human dignity; dignity which precedes the establishment of any State, and whose custody constitutes its very purpose.

In these past two-hundred and fifty years, for so many peoples throughout the world, it was the firm resolve to achieve the noble vision of the nation’s founders that made America a byword for freedom, as the country opened its doors to successive waves of immigrants, enabling them and their children to play their part in shaping the future of the nation. It was this same love of freedom that inspired the United States, in the darkest hours of the last century, at the time of the two world wars, to look beyond itself and, at great sacrifice, to champion the cause of freedom beyond its own borders. 

As every American knows, however, the path to building a society that would embody those high ideals of liberty and justice for all was not always easy and, in many respects, is still a work in progress.  Indeed, the effort to realize this vision is one that must be taken up anew in each generation and in the face of ever new challenges. Today, as we look to the future, this historic anniversary presents us with the opportunity to reflect once again on the nation’s founding principles in the hope that America will remain ever true to the dream that has earned it the title of land of the free and home of the brave.

The first right enshrined by the nation’s founders was the right to life, for no one who is deprived of life can enjoy liberty or pursue happiness. A country’s vitality is deeply tied to the value it affords to human life in every form and condition, acknowledging the dignity endowed upon every human person by virtue of their very existence.  The inherent worth of every human life has led the noble hearts of generations to praise the marvelous works of the Creator (cf. Ps 139:14) and stand in reverence before so precious a gift. Indeed, it is precisely this reverence that we must continue to cultivate — one that sways the hearts of individuals and inspires laws that recognize and safeguard the gift from the moment of conception to natural death.  Reverence, too, will aid us in discovering that we are guardians and stewards of those entrusted to our care. In this regard, the moral greatness of a nation is manifested, above all, in its capacity to support, protect and cherish the lives of all, especially the most vulnerable and those whose worth is questioned.

Following the right to life, liberty was and is preeminent among the principles revered by the men and women who have sought within this nation’s borders a new beginning, often equating it with previously undreamed-of hope. Though frequently understood as the ability to act as one would like, authentic freedom runs much deeper.  It is founded upon the human person’s capacity to know the truth and adhere to what is good, even at great cost — a sacrifice well known to many who have labored to shape this country.  The desire for truth and freedom, as well as the very pursuit of happiness, continues to inspire people of all generations to ask fundamental questions regarding the meaning of life, our ultimate purpose, and indeed about God, and it is proper for magnanimous hearts to endeavor to answer these questions with sincerity.  These answers inevitably determine the direction which we seek to give to our lives, and America has long championed the religious freedom necessary to follow responsibly the dictates of conscience in this regard, free from fear and coercion, as enshrined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It is this freedom that holds sacred the inner sphere of the person where convictions are formed and where conscience can guide the decisions made in the intimacy of the human heart.  This same freedom also ensures the right of every person to worship according to one’s own belief, and of individuals, communities and associations to give public expression to their faith.  In fact, religious freedom gave rise to the American tradition of allowing for interfaith dialogue and interreligious cooperation in promoting the public good and enriching the debates on the great moral and ethical issues that have faced the nation and shaped the course of its history. It is my hope that this tradition will continue to bear fruit in a public discourse marked by moderation, respect for the views of others and an ongoing effort to find common ground in promoting the cause of peace and reconciliation, at home and abroad. 

The forbearers of this country, men and women of diverse backgrounds, religions and languages, were able to find that common ground and the strength necessary to pursue a better future.  The principles that inspired America’s founders, rooted as they are in the truth of the human person, brought them together in a single cause, a common dream. Unity lent strength to that dream, giving rise, under God, to the United States of America. E pluribus unum — out of many, one.  In order for a nation to flourish, it must be truly united; united not by goals bound to momentary endeavors, but by ideals that do not fade with the passing of time.  May the principles we have reflected upon today — a shared human dignity, equality and the rights laid out in the Declaration of Independence — ever be a source of such unity and a guiding light for the present moment and for the years to come. 

In accepting this award, I therefore pray that this, the 250th anniversary of the founding of this great nation, may be the occasion of a solemn recommitment to these ideals that have made America a country that values peace and prosperity, a country characterized by generosity and nobility of heart. I commend all of you, as well as the future of the Nation, to the One who is himself the source of true freedom and lasting peace, the One whose very name is Peace.

May God bless America! Thank you!

This is, I'd note, copyrighted, but I'm claiming the fair use exception here.

Pope Leo has really been a shining light for Americans who are horrified by Donald Trump.  He's particularly a shining light for people like me, who are conservatives horrified by Donald Trump. He's proof to the world that not all Americans are some sort of strange Dixiecrat vandals.


Related Threads:

Sunday, June 28, 2026

Why the cowboy hat?

 


I'd note that the Father wears a proper ranching style cowboy hat.  

Cowboy hats are something a person either looks natural in, or they don't.  Not everyone who wears one is a rancher or a farmer by any means, but usually a person without a real rural background can't pull it off.

Notably this year Florida lawyer Frank Campman can't.  At age 58, Chapman is a retired Florida lawyer who has the thick girth of somebody whose worked behind a desk.  The hat he's chosen to wear, now that in his retirement he's relocated to Teton County and become a dude rancher, is right out of 1950s television Westerns and doesn't fit.  It looks absolutely absurd.  His boots look absurd as well, and he walks like they're hurting his feet.  At least carpetbagging Chuck Gray hasn't tried to don a cowboy hat, which with his tiny physical size would be likely to cause him to simply disappear.

Locally, there's a lawyer whose a transplant from back east who wears a cowboy hat with a rolled brim, a gift from his spouse.  He's a nice enough guy, but it looks absurd.  In contrast, a local judge wears one that looks very natural, but he's from here.

Part of it is, I think, being comfortable in your own skin.  We've all heard "fake it until you make it", but in truth, you can't.

Thursday, May 21, 2026

National Park Service Uprooted on the National Mall


When I become President, every golf course in the United States will be grazing land.

Same thing with shopping malls.

National Park Service Uprooted on the National Mall

I know how to play golf, but I don't golf.  It's boring and sanitized.  The kind of sport for people who want to go outside, but fear the outside, or are hopelessly urban.  Granted, that's not the fault of all of the hopelessly urban, and that's the place for golf.

Golf is one of those sports that underwent an evolution in my mind when I was quite young.  I won't say that is rational or correct. 

My mother was a first rate golfer.  My father didn't golf at all.  None of the men I knew when very young golfed, and when I came to know some that did, as I aged, they were men who didn't do the things, or didn't do them to the same extent, as the men I knew.  Golfing men didn't hunt much, they didn't fish much, they weren't going to be found at brandings.  They all tended to be from the upper upper middle class, or the lower wealthy.  In my mind, they were effeminized as they were playing what seemed to me to be an effeminate sport.

That view of golf hasn't changed much for me and indeed its been reenforced as I've grown older.  I know that there are some really manly men that golf, but I don't know very many.  Of guy's guys that I know that golf, there's one really nice guy I know who does, and that somehow fits him.  He's a computer guy.  And there's one that's just too out of shape to do anything else, and you can be pretty out of shape and play golf if you use a cart.  Neither of them are effeminate.

I don't think, actually, that these feelings are as unique as a person might think.  At one point in time lawyers were associated with golf (not anymore) and some golfed as they felt they had to.  This was particularly the case with new lawyers.  I've known at least two new lawyers who golfed as they thought that's what lawyers did.  Interestingly, of those two lawyers, I know a third person, a woman, who insists that one of them is "gay" just by her observations of him, even though he's been a married man for years.  Maybe the golfing was too effeminizing.

In a weird sort of way, Donald Trump emphasized this a couple of years ago when he simply gushed over his probably totally fictional observations of the size of Arnold Palmer's penis.

Seriously?

Oddly enough, golf was definitely associated with lesbianism at one time.  This was the case for decades, and in some ways it cuts against what I'm noting here.  As a sport, it was a sport that women could participate in and do very well as professionals, and so perhaps, maybe, women who were sort of masculine in their internal inclinations participated at a higher rate that would have simply existed in the general population.

Oddly, golf at one time was highly segregated in every imaginable way.  Blacks flat out weren't allowed on private golf courses, but often women weren't either.  Lawsuits were required to end that.  Wealth played a role to play on private courses, and still does.  Indeed wealth played a role in keeping women off of golf courses, as business deals were conducted on them from which they were omitted, and that helped bring about the lawsuits later on.

All that probably offends my Irish egalitarianism.

I can't say much for golf. 

Golf also seems to me to be the ultimate boring urban upper middle class excuse for a sport, at least at one time.  Manly men might shoot hoops, or go play flag football, or something, but at one time towns and real estate developers put in golf courses as it was the default sport for aging white people.

Tennis is the other urban sport, or was.  It's joined by basketball and pickle ball in that category, the latter being a newer sport whose existence I don't understand.  The thing is, however, that to play any of those sports well, you really need to be in shape.  The same kind of guy that can really drive a tennis ball over the net can drive a baseball right down the field at lethal speed.

Supposedly golf has declined in popularity in recent decades, and its notable that at the same time the demographics of the country are changing.  Golf was heavily racist at one time and indeed it was more recently than a person might imagine, although there have been some really notable Hispanic and Black golfers.  Golf is apparently of Scottish origin, where it would have been pretty darned manly, so its an import of the British Isles.  People from other cultures don't really have any roots in it, and for that matter, lots of European Americans don't.  Shooting was the sport for Germans, and competitive shooting, like polo, was a major military sport.  Shooting was, and in fact is, a major civilian sport in many parts of the country.  Basketball is an American sport, as is baseball, and both were played by rural and lower middle class demographics at first.  Basketball is particularly interesting this way as it comes from farming country with bitter winters, so its a good indoor sport for a lot of pretty athletic people.

Football is actually of British origin, but the origin is from the British lower class and it reflects that origin to this day.  Hunting is a male human universal, which recent anthropology suggest had more female participation in antiquity than previously imagined.

Gardening, hunting, shooting, walking, running and nearly anything just seems to have more merit that golf.  But it hangs on in the minds of the elderly, a game of privilege from their youth.

So that a bloated old man with money would choose to wreck things for golf, makes sense.  People tend to hang on to the era in which they were young, and the wealthy have more of an ability to do that than other people.  The super wealthy have the ability to afflict that on everyone else.

Saturday, April 18, 2026

Citizen-Soldiers – not “Warriors”

I have an upcoming post related to this, but I'll start here on the topic with this excellent essay from Angry Staff Officer.

Citizen-Soldiers – not “Warriors”

Thursday, April 16, 2026

A Fossil Fuel Free Future is Here.

This was obvious, but will remain unrecognized for quite some time, for the same reason that coal is almost dead, but people don't grasp it.


Average people's ability to really grasp an existential change in something is pretty poor as a rule.  It's not so much that people choose to live in the past as it is that they have no grasp that the past of their younger lives and of their parents lives, the latter of which a lot of people hold to in a sort of mythical way, evolves.  We see that a lot in the U.S. right now.

The entire imaginary economy of Donald Trump is one that's grounded in a mythical 1970s, when he was young and clubbing and men lusting after girls in their teens was basically okay, du e to the sexual revolution.  MAGA, for its part, imagines a mythical 1950s economy, not understanding why the economy of the 1950s was the way it was.  In both instances, and particularly in regard to the 1970s economy, things were not as rosy as imagined.

Coal has been dying ever since the Royal Navy went to oil for ships.  We've discussed that before here:

Coal: Understanding the time line of an industry

Coal is not coming back.  In fact, it's demise is accelerating.  Lot of the globe, including China, in spite of what a demented Donald Trump thinks, is racing towards renewables.  Trump can't really imagine it as he's 80 years old and in the 70s there weren't very many big windmills, although even then there was a push towards renewable power.

Indeed, that push was started by the Arab Oil Embargo and people have been working on the technology ever since.  Now renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels for power generation.  Only nuclear can compete.

Every since the 70s engineers have been working on electric vehicles as well. Their day has arrived.

And Donald Trump started a war that will accelerate the pace of this change, rapidly.  Trump might end up being recalled as the greenest President ever, accidentally.

The change just won't be a switch to clean electrical power, and that switch is rapidly coming and no amount of John Barrasso and Harriet Hageman calling for the mythical "clean coal" will stop it.  It's also going to be a switch away from the sort of vehicle based economy we have now.  People aren't going to stop owning cars, but already a younger generation really isn't all that enamored with them.  Self driving vehicles, as much as I hate the idea, are coming in. With them will come self driving semi tractors and more importantly, in my view, remotely driven electric trains.

There's no reason that railroads can't be controlled like giant model train layouts.  Model trains already provide the model for it.  We're not far from that day.

That day is coming now whether Donald Trump, Harriet Hageman, John Barrasso, or people with an emotional tie to fossil fuels like it or not.  Your livelihood depending on it won't matter either.

It's already happening.

Monday, April 6, 2026

We need to amend the Constitution. Introduction.

If Donald Trump's illegal occupation of the Oval Office (he's an insurrectionist and not legally qualified to occupy the office with out Congressional relief) has shown us anything, it's that much of the way American government has been working is identical to the way the British one does. . . we just figure it works this way.

Trump, who is not a very smart man, smashed that as Trump is all about Trump, and doesn't what he wants.  He's therefore demonstrated where all the holes are, although frankly quite a few of them have been obvious for some time.  

In this series, we'll look at what needs to be fixed, and how to fix it.