Politics, as they say, makes for strange bedfellows.
New Senate Whip John Barrasso with President Elect Donald Trump and President John F. Kennedy with his nephew Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Politics is, we also know, the art of compromise, but to what extent is a politician to blame for compromising with the truth?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been chosen by Donald Trump to be the new head of Health and Human Services.
He is, frankly, a nutter on health topics, who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near such a post.
John Barrasso is, by training, an orthopedic surgeon.
I've long suspected, well I'm pretty much certain, that Dr. Barrasso doesn't actually believe even half of what he's saying..He's doing it to 1) keep his Senatorial seat; and 2) advance himself in the Senate, even though at his age he could easily retire and be done with it.
Without getting too deep into it, I also believe that once you start compromising on fundamental things, you keep doing it, including with the truth. You don't start off deep into it, but you end up there.
Dr. Barrasso was known, at one time, as "Wyoming's Doctor" and had spots on local television with health minutes, and hosted the Labor Day Marathon. He continued to do this after he became Senator, a spot he was appointed to by the legislature to fill a vacancy before he was elected.
I've met him, as a physician, but can't claim to know him. I've been with him on commercial aircraft numerous times. I've always left him alone, as I figure that while traveling, people don't like to be bothered. I don't. Not everyone was like that, however, and I'd see people who recognized him treat him sort of like fans treated Elvis Presley.
Dr. Barrasso is originally from Pennsylvania. With a solid Italian American parentage, and an early Catholic education, I'd guess, but don't know, that he was a Catholic up until some point. He list himself as a Presbyterian now, and has been divorced, and later remarried. He's in his early 70s. Early on, his positions were clearly moderate Republican, but starting at least as early as 2016 they began to rapidly head towards Trumpism. He had a right wing challenger in the GOP primary last go around, and while I think the chances of him every losing were small, he went hardcore to the right.
Now he's the whip. Trump is going to expect him to whip up support for Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, holds some of the nuttiest ideas on healthcare, and particularly vaccines, imaginable. He shouldn't be anywhere near the Department of Health and Human Services.
Will Barrasso choke those down and support them.
Again, people don't get to supporting anything overnight. Some do rapidly, some over decades.
RFK, Jr. has no business in this office.
Kennedys
Before moving on, hasn't the country had enough of the Kennedys?
I certainly have.
The over tattooed and expropriation.
Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, is taking a lot of flak. Some of it is for things he's said or believes
Some of it for his tattoos, which are interpreted to mean things which they might not.
One of those tattoos is of a Jerusalem Cross.
The Jerusalem cross consists of a large cross potent surrounded by four smaller Greek crosses representing the spread of the gospel to the four corners of the earth. It was used as the emblem and coat of arms of the Kingdom of Jerusalem after 1099.
Hegeth is a member of a church which is part of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches. Therefore, he's appropriating a Catholic symbol, while he's not a Catholic. Indeed, he's not even close, as he's on his third spouse, something no adherent Catholic would have done.
He also has a tattoo on a bicep that states Deus vult, "God wills", a phrase that dates back to the First Crusade, but which has been appropriated by many groups over the years. And it doesn't stop there.
“Israel, Christianity and my faith are things I care deeply about,” he's stated.
Perhaps he should learn more about the faith espoused by the symbols that he's had inked on himself. Indeed, quite frankly, the men who cried Deus vult in the 11th Century and those who fought to defend the Kingdom of Jerusalem would have regarded him as a heretic.
Anyhow, one thing that I've worried about since the rise of Christian Nationalist is that Catholics are the ones who are going to take a beating in the end, even though its really a Protestant movement. I can already see it starting to happen. Former Senator Adam Kinzinger, who comments heavily on Blue Sky and Twitter, had a post noting that "the Crusades weren't Christian". Oh yes they were, the thing they weren't is the edited version that English Protestants came up with to attempt to tar and feather the Church. Others have been running around claiming that the Jerusalem Cross, which Catholics use a lot, is a Nazi symbol, which it isn't, or a camouflaged swastika, which it isn't.
The United States remains a Protestant nation, including in the way it reacts to symbols and in its misunderstanding of history.
All this serves, I'd note, to bury a deeper item that should be of actual concern, which is the American Evangelical view towards Israel. This is not universal, by any means, but there's a branch of American Evangelicalism which sees itself as having a direct role in bringing about the Second Coming through its interaction with Israel. According to somebody who knew him and commented on it recently (therefore at least making it somewhat suspect) former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, who has been nominated by Trump to be Ambassador to Israel, and who is a Baptist minister, has those views.
Really, people with the apparent views of Huckabee and Kinzinger really have no business in the offices they've been nominated to serve in.
Hairless wonders.
This is sort of an odd aside, but the huge increase in male tattoos, including chest tattoos, has caused me to wonder, has there been a reduction in male chest hair in recent years?
Chest hair is a secondary male characteristic which is caused by a variety of genetic factors. One of those is a high testosterone level, and for that reason, hairy chests have gone, at any one time, from being regarded as "brutish" to sexy. Because of the conditions of the Second World War, Americans were acclimated for a time to seeing men shirtless, which was unusual, and for a good several decades after the war, hairy chested men, or just flat out hairy men in general, were in vogue. Indeed I can recall seeing some 1960s vintage war movie with Fabian in it which was ridiculously hairy.
This is clearly really out now, but it still raises the question, what's going on. Personally, I couldn't have a giant chest tattoo like Hegseth for the same reason that Tom Selleck couldn't. I doubt that I really could have a tattoo anywhere safe for the the generally non visible part of my arms either.
It's interesting to note that there has been a substantial reduction in detected testosterone levels in the US since the 1980s.**
Maybe RFK, Jr. can look into that.
Creeps
It's a real irony that the man so many Christian Evangelicals saw as the Christian candidate has such a horrible personal tract record at least in the sexual ethics category, but perhaps that fact should cause us to be less than surprised that he nominated Matt Gaetz to be Attorney General of the United States.
There seem to be no doubt that Gaetz dabbled down in this category to a 17 year old. Yes, he wasn't prosecuted, but he may have had a credible defense based on scienter. According to at least one report, once he learned she was 17, he abstained from her favors until she was 18.
The thing here, however, is that this conduct is completely immoral. Not only is it sex outside of marriage, which Christianity, but Gaetz is a creep who is fishing in the bottom of the well. Frankly, this deserves further investigation as most 17 year olds or 18 year olds would have had no interest in Gaetz, so something should be done to figure out why they did and what's behind that.
This guy has no significant legal experience and shouldn't be anywhere near the AG's office.
Scenes from the American dumpster fire.
Strange bedfellows indeed.
At this point, however, if Matt Gaetz invited Mike Johnson over to the Playboy Grotto, if it still existed, I'd expect him to go.
Something about this photo just shows how trashy American culture has become.
Trashy.
I think there is sort of a faction in the Republican Party that has a strange kind of... sort of homoerotic fascination for Putin.
Boris Johnson recently stated this.
The fascination for Putin (who has a hairless chest, I'd note) is pretty weird.
Trad Rant
The recent election seems to have bubbled some stuff up from the bottom of the cultural dutch oven, and not just stuff like the weird things noted in the two above entries. Some of this is interesting to ponder, including pondering whether its a serious trend or something else.
One of them is the emergence of secular (and religious) trad women, holding a romantic, it seems, view of the not so distant path.
Here's an example. Interesting trad rant starting at 21:00.
I don't want to go to far in criticizing this, really, as it has a real appeal, as does a lot of sort of agrarian conservatism and Chesteronian distributism I see creeping into the culture, sort of sideways. These people are sincere, and there's a real appeal to it. Shoot, I'd live an agrarian life if people around me would allow it, or so I tell myself.
Others tell themselves that too, and also mock themselves, as for example, here:
Below is an exchange started when 34 year old Lauren Boebert, the darling of some of the Trump wing of the GOP, posted on power outages in Texas. Boebert has made a name for herself by being one of the crop of hard right elected Congressmen that came in last election. She's definitely in the hard, hard right wing of the GOP. She's noted for carrying a gun in D.C., to the extent that she's not noted for the Mae Winchester effect, that being that any woman carrying a gun on the Internet who is not unattractive and under 40 is going to be regarded as a major babe by some.
This has nothing to do with guns.
It has something to do with electricity.
Lauren Boebert
@laurenboebert
Rolling blackouts from ND to TX have turned into lengthy power outages in freezing conditions.
Biden needs to lift his oil & gas ban as we need reliable energy sources.
The Green New Deal was just proven unsustainable as renewables are clearly unreliable.
7:45 PM · Feb 15, 2021·Twitter for iPhone
6,752
Retweets
921
Quote Tweets
23K
Likes
Helen
@luvtheusa76
·
Replying to
@laurenboebert
Ice on power lines has literally nothing to do with oil and gas Insurrectionist Barbie.
7
24
732
Nuancically Tweeting
@MahGill
·
Replying to
@laurenboebert
First, there is no "oil & gas ban." Second, I don't see you saying, "We need more wind power!" when oil rigs are shut down in the Gulf because of hurricanes, spiking gas prices. Third, the larger problems today were with natural gas delivery.
9
14
249
Major
@MajorDog524
·
Replying to
@laurenboebert
The first ongoing crisis was covid
I fear the Dems have just found their 2nd crisis with which to subjugate us.
52
5
37
Samuel VanSant Stoddard
@profchaosUSA
·
Replying to
@laurenboebert
Actually, you are proving why Green New Deal would be great for rural America!
Our power grid is so old and antiquated, any small storm can cause massive power outages, plus it's inefficient and costs consumers way more.
Let's put people to work updating our infrastructure!
29
103
643
JRehling
@JRehling
·
Replying to
@laurenboebert
The power lines are down because we aren't drilling for more oil, hm?
😒
I don't know why Texas is having power interruption. I do know that when I was young, we had power interruptions here every time we had a really bad storm, and we're in a region which expected really bad storms. We still get really bad storms, although not as often as we once did, but we don't get power outages much anymore. Indeed, they're really rare.
A factor in that has been, I'm pretty sure, a dedicated effort to put the overhead lines underground. Indeed, we're more likely to get a power outage now due to a construction accident than a storm, although we still get some storm induced ones.
I don't know the state of delivery lines in Texas. Maybe they're overhead, maybe they aren't, maybe they're both. But Texas has embraced the high growth model of American economics, and that has its problems. Stretching infrastructure is one of them.
A friend of mine who lives in Texas (and I have quite a few friends in Texas) takes the view here, but in a much more developed fashion. He asserts that green energy requirements have made for a shift to unreliable forms of generation and that's stressed the system. Is that right? I don't know. It might be, and if it is, it would be because cold naps, like heat waves, create a high demand for energy. Lots of windmills have been off line due to the storm. Solar has probably been impacted. Lots of houses in Texas, for example, have their heat on night and day right now, when normally they would not. That could be it.
On the other hand, the point by one Stoddard isn't without merit. Rethinking power delivery may make sense, in both an urban and a rural sense. He may be confused, I'd note, by the degree to which the power demand in Texas is rural. Texas is heavily urban.
Beyond that, here's something else. Like electric cars, this day is coming. There's a certain hold back the tide aspect to a lot of these discussions, but no matter what a person thinks about them, we've crossed a tipping point in this discussion and the evolution away from carbon based power generation is going to keep on keeping on.
And, on the last point, we're at the classic American finger pointing early administration point. Nobody can blame any new President for anything, as they haven't had the time to really have an impact on anything, yet.
*Mae Winchester is presenter on the C&Rsenal Vlog. While not unattractive, she's not a raving beauty either, but any woman appearing with a gun is guaranteed to receive piles of male Internet fans.