Showing posts with label Zeitgeist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zeitgeist. Show all posts

Friday, September 4, 2026

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 153rd Edition. The Hunt for the Golden Pheasants, Delusional monuments, Recovering the imaginary 1950s.

Ousted.


Maria Bartiromo was given the boot at Fox.

That's really remarkable.

Bartiromo managed to go from being a credible mainstream reporter to a Trump talking head after leaving going to Fox in 2014.  Her departure would indicate that we've entered the "Hunt for the Golden Pheasants" stage of the Trump regime in which there's localized uprising.  The recent resignation of the Secretary of the Army fits into that as well.

I seriously thought that by this point the 25th Amendment would have been invoked and we'd have a President J. D. Vance trying to cut his own path.  People like Hegseth would be gone.  There'd be no Iran war and the tariff experiment would be over.  What didn't count on wa the administration being made up of radical right wing Confederates and Seven Mountain adherents, as well as members of the Waffen Grenadier Brigade of the SS Charlemagne that have no place to go.  So it appears my prediction was incorrect, although there's still hope.  Having said that, those who plan on surviving the regime are beginning to make their exit, or are being tossed overboard.

Well, Bye Felicia.

Trying to sell.


Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum announced that the Trump Admin will begin a further vandalization project this upcoming week and very clearly he knows nobody wants it, and therefore is trying really, really, hard to sell it.  He took to Twitter trying to show that Presidents have so dearly wanted an arch   Witness:

Secretary Doug Burgum@SecretaryBurgum

We are pleased to announce that after a very long wait (over 125 years!), we are preparing to start, over the next two-week period, the excavation work necessary for the Great Triumphal Arch and Military Observation Deck, at Memorial Circle on Columbia Island between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery. This will be one of the Great Pieces of American Architecture, honoring the history and significance of Arlington Cemetery and befitting the most powerful Capital in the World.

For over 125 years, Congress and various congressionally chartered commissions decreed that a monumental work should adorn Columbia Island. In 1902, the U.S. Senate’s “McMillan Commission” called for “a concourse suited to memorial treatment be established” on the westerly terminus of the Memorial Bridge.

In 1924, the congressional chartered Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission stated, “[Columbia Island] was always considered as a suitable site for formal park treatment, a fitting end for the Memorial Bridge, as well as an important feature in itself.” Specifically, the Commission called for “a plaza with fitting architectural adornment in a measure supplemental to the Lincoln Memorial across the river.”

Despite Congress’s intent, the site became and remains today a barren traffic circle lacking any monumental treatment and significant historic value. In fact, the passage extending from Arlington Memorial Bridge to Arlington National Cemetery was meant to serve as an Avenue of Heroes.

In the years after World War II, Ulysses S. Grant III— who was the grandson of the former president and Union general Ulysses S. Grant, executive officer of the Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission, and member of the National Capital Park and Planning Commission—decried the state of Columbia Island as a “temporary road with an informal circle.” He lamented that “the central plaza on Columbia Island had never been undertaken and seems to be absolutely essential to link together the two parts of the project, namely the main bridge itself and the entrance to Arlington Cemetery.”

Over 70 major cities/capitals around the world, from London, Paris and Rome to Madrid, Athens and New Delhi, all showcase beautiful arches. Interestingly, Washington, DC, is the only major Western capital without an arch. Now after 125 years of waiting, the most powerful capital in the world will be home of the most spectacular and beautiful arch of them all!

M'eh.

Nobody wants it except for King Donny.  The irony of building a triumphal arch while losing a war is really rich for one thing, and this is a huge monstrosity.

Maybe if they were going to put something there, they could put up a small monument (not gilded) to Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus.  He could serve as an example to these guys.

Anything one government builds, another can rip down.

The U.S. Army blows the Swastika off of the Nuremberg parade grounds.

Anyhow, at last there's a really growing movement to rip this crap, including the ballroom, down as soon as Trump is out of office.

This from Senator Ted Lieu:

Here is my prediction: the Democratic presidential candidate who promises to restore the White House to what it looked like pre-trump will win the primary and the Presidency.

I"m seeing a lot of that now.

Just ripping it down might be illegal. But then the Supreme Court has already established that  you can get away with building this crap even if it is illegal, and ripping stuff down takes a lot less time than putting it up.

On the White House, by the way, the wings were added in 1902.  With one already gone, they ought to take the other out in my opinion and just restore the building to its original architectural integrity. The wings don't look great to start with and the ballroom looks absurd.

A trip down Trump's memory lane.

An Albert Dornei illustration of how bowling was once imagined in the urban world of the 1950s.  Posted via fair use exception.

The Trump administration has announced its renovating the bowling alley in the White House as well.

The bowling alley story really brings into focus the way that the Trump administration, captured by the decaying mind of Donald Trump, is sort of a monument to an imaginary 1950s where everyone was urban, white, middle class, or maybe upper middle class.

I realize that people still bowl, but bowling reached the apex of its popularity in the 50s and 60s when automatic pin setters came in.  Golfing peaked later, in the 90s and 2000s, but the mental image of golfing in a lot of ways, in terms of its popular image, is from an earlier era.  Ballroom dancing was biggest in the mid 20th Century, basically from when the American population started to rapidly become urban and music, first jazz, and then later big band, dominated.

7up ad featuring bowling, 1963.

A popular study of the decline of American culture in some ways is titled "Bowling Alone".  A person can look at this in a lot of ways, but the cultural evolution of the country, which has been negative in many, maybe most, ways has hit all of this stuff.  One big factor, and yes here we go again, is that the demographic rabbit in the snake of the Baby Boomers changed all of this.  Bowling, as noted, is still sort of a big deal, and its charmingly portrayed in The Big Lebowski, but even when I was young most young people didn't bowl, and regarded it as, well, square.  Big halls where you had to rent shoes and dispirited older blue collar workers hung out, drank Budweiser, and smoked cigarettes lacked appeal.  If you talked to our parents generation, however, you'd see that isn't how they viewed bowling when they were young at all.


Golf had a real reputation as an upper middle class sport when I was young. The sort of sport that lawyers and doctors engaged in and talked shop.  I still sort of regard it that way, although that time has passed too, and now I think of it as a sport that is played by old lawyers and doctors.  I know that's not really fair, but there's an element of truth to it.



Ballroom dancing is something that was dead as a doornail by the time I was old enough to hit any kind of a dancefloor, by which I mean a high school gym.  The 60s had killed it.  Indeed, this was illustrated recently by a video going viral of elderly people dancing to AC/DC at a nursing home.  I've wondered if that would occur. For years, if you went to a nursing home at certain times of the day, you'd hear The Lawrence Welk Show blaring.  

I'll be that's not the case anymore.

Well, for somebody like Trump, who is old, wealthy and likes to golf, and is old, and has big structures, and is old, all this probably seems a lot like taking a trip back to the past, like watching American Graffiti. One thing about the really wealthy is that they hang on to certain social aspects of the past more than other classes, so a wealthy hotelier like Trump probably did grow up thinking ballrooms were cool, and probably still does.

Going back to the past is a pretty strong desire for the old, and particularly strong for the demented old.  I'm told that my dying grandmother on my mother's side, as her dying words, noted that my grandfather "sure can play tennis" no doubt recalling what he'd been like when they were young.  Trump's now fixated on his reputation and on building.  He's building like crazy, and building his way back to the past.

Of course, most old people can't command the entire resources of the nation to attempt to reconstruct an imaginary past.

Sic transit gloria mundi

Trump's monuments in stone will only last as long as Americans tolerate their presence.  They shouldn't tolerate them for more than one second after he's gone.  The next administration should tear them all down on the very first day of the next adminsitration.

It's necessary.

Last edition:

King Donald's War, Part 12. The "Economic D-Day" edition. CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 152nd Edition, the irony edition.

Tuesday, September 1, 2026

King Donald's War, Part 12. The "Economic D-Day" edition. CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 152nd Edition, the irony edition.

The fearsome Scott Bessent.

August 26, 2026

King Donny sent the fearsome Scott Bessent out to cause the Iranians to quiver in their boots, announcing that the US would inflict an "Economic D-Day" on Iran.

Except the US is going to exempt China, meaning that Operation Economic Outcast was stillborn from the very beginning.

Midweek Update#25: Sanctions Without China Are A Sign Of Defeat

So, It Turns Out That The US Is Winning!; A Story Illustrating Why This Pentagon Cannot Be Trusted

The US is moving its ambassadors back to the Middle East, however, which suggests it either naively thinks this will work, or that it's just going to give up.

Meanwhile:

Pentagon reveals hundreds of new Iran war casualties

More than 600 troops have been wounded in the Iran war, officials disclosed Saturday, almost 200 more than previously known.

This post, by the way, is the first one that I've ever had Bessent's name as a label, which surprises me.  He's been mentioned before, but I've never put in a label.

One thing I've thought about doing is posting how he's sort of uniquely a symbol of hypocrisy in the Trump Administration, or maybe in MAGA.  MAGA proclaims loudly that it's for "Christian" values by which it means far right Evangelical values.

Christianity pretty clearly holds that homosexual sex is a mortal sin.  St. Paul was blunt about it.  And yet Bessent is a homosexual in a homosexual union in which two children are being raised.  Most actual Christians of any type would question this, and if Evangelical Christians are to be believed, they find it completely abhorrent.

But then, by the same token, having an alleged president who is a serial polygamist, a special envoy for the Shield of the Americas, whatever that is, who seemed to be having an affair while in her earlier role and whose husband was wearing giant fake boobs in internet photos, etc. etc., is pretty odd too.

Indeed, it's impossible to reconcile.

Mind you, I'm not saying that a homosexual, including one who is in a homosexual union, cannot be an effective Secretary of the Treasury.  I'm saying you can't have an implied policy that everyone who isn't, white, straight, and sympathetic to far right Evangelicalism isn't a real American and still have a homosexual as one of your primary cabinet members and really mean any of that.

Making it all the more odd, Bessent is one of those cabinet members who has in recent months been dragged out to try to explain away whatever brain fart the Trump has uttered.  

That feature of this administration has been there all along.  Whereas for a transportation issue you might, in normal times, get a Transportation official, in this administration you might very well end up getting the Chief Chef of the White House to address it. And people appear and then disappear in that role pretty rapidly.  Chris Wright, the Secretary of Energy, regularly was being hauled out to address the Press on all sorts of things for awhile, right up until he said that Biden was validly elected to the Oval Office.

Goodbye Chris.

Anyhow, there's something extra weird about Bessent, who always seems extremely nervous, being hauled out to address the Press on the war while we have Pete "High T" Hegseth in charge of the "War Department".  Hegseth definitely fits into the far right Evangelical mold and is loud about it, while also being loud about the services being for manly men.  

Well, anyhow.  So much for Operation Economic Outcast.

August 31, 2026

Trump just shot some missiles at Iran and nobody cared

September 1, 2026

Iran, which you will recall supposedly lost the war, numerous times, hit Jordan with missiles within the last couple of days.

Only somewhat related, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, who is close to J. D. Vance, submitted his resignation.  It is well known that he does not get along with Hegseth.

Last edition:

King Donald's War, Part 11. The worst defeat in American History. Sic transit Gloria Mundi.


Friday, August 28, 2026

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 153rd Edition. The maddening intersection of all politics being local and the two party "system".

 

Lake Ontario

I can't really say that Donald Trump ineffectual, moronic, but potentially  expensive attempt to rename Lake Ontario into Lake America (and by the way, "America" is not the name of the United States) is the absolute last straw for me.  That straw was broken years ago.  It was obvious right from the onset that Donald Trump was not qualified to hold any elective office.  However, in his first, and only legitimate, term as President, there was still a Republican Party.  Now that party doesn't exist.  It's just a bunch of ass kissers.

At least on the national level.

I'll frequently say that "I'll never vote for another Republican as long as I live", and I don't want to.  A party that will not renounce and remove a person like Donald Trump, who is mentally ill, from the Oval Office cannot be supported.  It's horrific.  But the problem, then, is when you get down to the local level.

We just saw in Wyoming a real Republican Party toss out fake Dixiecrat Republicans from office.  The only real survivor of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus bloodbath was Bill Allemand.  Some of the really good Republicans who wiped out Freedom Caucus members, like Luke Reiner who tossed out Steve Johnson, will face Democratic challengers.  And at the state level, a really good Republican who took the GOP nomination for the Governor's office, Barlow, is facing a challenge from a Democrat and Rebecca Bextel, the clueless Double Secret Constitution Party candidate.  So the irony we now face is that the majority, but not all, of the recent Republican victors are good candidates and probably think that Donald Trump is in need of mental help.  Given that, an enraged vote for a Democrat here, or not voting for the office at all, would in fact be a bad move.

But that's no excuse to vote in favor of every Republican on the ballot here.

It's particularly not an excuse to vote for Harriet Hageman or Chuck Gray.  Indeed, there'd never be an excuse to vote for Gray.  Gray doesn't deserve any votes.

Hageman really doesn't either.  She's got in office acting like an enraged MAGA harpy even though she probably isn't.  In office, she's been the distaff variant of her late father.  A smart hyper provincial politician whose drank deeply of the hardworking pioneer myth to the extent that she's drunk on it, and like most of those of that belief, basically believes that farmers should own the whole state and you don't count.  She's been, frankly, mean in her public personal and her political one.

Stuff like this really puts Catholics in a spot.
We need to participate for the common good. Sometimes we hear: a good Catholic is not interested in politics. This is not true: good Catholics immerse themselves in politics by offering the best of themselves so that the leader can govern.

Pope Francis.

For a long time, we've been in a spot due to abortion and, more recently, gender issues.

Abortion is murder. There's no two ways about it.  Mutilating the body to change genders isn't murder, but it is a mental disease and entertaining it is gravely wrong.    At one time there were Democrats who acknowledged these things.  Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas is the last pro life Democrat in the body.  Generally, Democrats are in favor of seas of infant blood flowing out of doctors' offices everywhere.

Today, more than ever, without prejudice to the right to self-defense in the strictest sense, it is important to reaffirm that the ‘just war’ theory, which has all too often been used to justify any kind of war, is now outdated

Pope Leo XIV

Undeclared wars of aggression are also gravely wrong.  Under at least Pope Leo's view, only defensive warfare is morally licit.  Attacking Iran was not only illegal under the U.S. constitution, it was not morally licit.  Attacking Venezuela was illegal and illicit.  Murdering people in boats off South American coasts as they're suspected of being drug runners is illegal and immoral.  The people ordering these things are committing homicide, as are the people doing them.  The US is killing people illegally and immorally as a matter of national policy, or rather the policy of handful of illegally acting people.

Threatening to take property? or life because we can is gravely immoral. Threatening to steal Greenland, or whatever, is immoral.  Taking the mineral wealth of Venezuela is immoral.

We are a deeply immoral nation.

How does a person weigh these thing?

Well, in my case anyhow, it means that I will not vote for Republican members of Congress.  I just won't.  I won't vote for people who are supporting military murder or extrajudicial killings.

Indeed, I do not think it's morally licit to do so.

Nor is it moral to demonize people based on their race or inclinations, which this administration has done and continues to do.

Finally, as a Catholic, and the same would be true for an Orthodox Christian, or a Mainline Protestant Christian, this administration is thickly populated by a certain sort of Evangelical thought that would convert the nation into a Calvinist theocracy.   People find that, it seems, to far fetched to consider, but it's a fact and many other things that were only recently too far fetched to imagine have now occurred.

Moreover, abortion, at the Federal level, is no longer constitutionally protected.  That takes that fight down to the state level, at least for the time being, although it is certainly not impossible to imagine a Democratically government, House, Senate, and Oval Office, acting to protect it on that level.  Whatever is going on in regard to transgenderism seems to have sort of stabilized and there doesn't seem to be anything going on with same sex "marriages".  Indeed, nervous Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is in one, putting him in the same category as Pete Buttigieg who was routinely lampooned by MAGA for being a homosexual in a same sex union.

Indeed, it's hard not to notice all the hypocrisy in the Republican Party on all of the remaining moral issues.  Bessent is homosexual and in a homosexual "marriage".  Vance is a Catholic but was boosting IVF.  Trump is a serial polygamist.  Republican politicians engage in marital infidelity and misbehavior with the GOP ignoring it ,while the opposite is true for Democrats when they transgress.

And finally, Trump, in order to remove the threat from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., made a deal with him to appoint him to the head of the nation's health, resulting in a further moronic decline in vaccinations and a major boosting of health stupidity.

All of this, again, haunts the Apostolic Christian.  Does a person vote for Republicans on the threat of abortion reviving, and thereby vote for war, childhood death by disease, ICE shooting in the streets, and on and on, let alone just voting for the patently stupid.

Of course, the two party system really isn't.  And often you really don't have to vote for the Republican or Democrat.  I haven't voted for a GOP nominee for White House in at least the last three elections, nor have I voted for the Democratic one.  I voted for the candidates from the American Solidarity Party.

The trouble there is that there often isn't a ASP candidate on the local level. There are none here.  The third parties that show up here are the Libertarian Party and the idiotic Constitution Party.  The Constitution Party is worse than the Republican Party, and always has been.

So for this year, I will vote for Barlow for Governor  He's a good choice.  I'd like to vote for Byrd for Senate, and I won't vote for Hageman, but I have yet to decide what I will do.  For House I'd like to write in Christensen and I won't vote for Gray while I want to avoid Kinney.  

All somewhat tough races to face.

Locally, I'm lucky that I don't have to make such decisions for my local legislative districts.  The City Council race is non partisan.  The County Commissioner race is partisan, however, and one of the finalists is simply awful, and I'd guess, quite frankly, actually extremely liberal in spite of running as a Republican, and another nice but not a great candidate.  That leaves the two Democrats to consider.  Abortion and whatnot will not be a county issue and while I have not made my mind up on who I will vote for, I won't vote for two of the three GOP finalists.

If any come by, I'll flat out ask; "why are you in a party which picks on Canada, declares illegal wars, and hates the original native name for a large lake?"

Last edition:

King Donald's War, Part 12. The "Economic D-Day" edition. CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 152nd Edition, the irony edition.

Monday, August 17, 2026

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 151st Edition. Дональд Трамп. Нелегалы? Donald Trump, Moscow's man in the White House or just really stupid (probably really stupid)?



Is Donald Trump a Russian agent?

I don't think so, but it's no longer an irrational thing to ask.  Indeed, it has to be at least slightly pondered.

Yesterday Trump announced that the U.S. Army is scaling back on joint exercises with the South Korean Military.  More specifically:


I just think that this shows Trump to be really dumb, something I've been maintaining for awhile. 

But still, consider that North Korea is supplying troops and arms to Russia in Ukraine.  At least at one point, he apparently promised to stop the CIA from monitoring Kim Jong Un (my guess is that the CIA would continue to do it even if ordered to stop).  He's praised the North Korean despot repeatedly.

But then, he's done the same with Putin.  

And the fact of the matter is that he couldn't have done more to harm the US in the globe than he has, even if he was a paid agent.  He's wrecking the US economy, he's destroying our relationship with our allies (our real allies), he's threatened to seize territory belonging to our allies.  He's refused to give Ukraine the full amount of weapons it needs to defend itself, which aids Russia, and he's gotten us into a war which is depleting our supply of air defense munitions at an alarming rate and taxing the abilities of our Navy.

China will take advantage of this.

In order to successfully invade Taiwan, China needs relatively calm weather conditions, which only occur in that region in the spring and fall. Spring is gone, but fall is coming right up.  The war with Iraq that Trump illegally launched will still be going on in October and our supply of anti missile missiles will not have increased a bit by then.  It will likely have have grown worse.  The morale problem in the Navy (assuming its limited to the Navy, which is not a safe assumption) will be worse by October.  

Consider this.

Right now, the US can't be reliably counted on to contest a Chinese invasion of Taiwan at all.  Donald Trump could easily just say "oh, well, we're busy, and things and stuff" and let it happen. Frankly, I'd give less than 50% odds the US would actually attempt to counter a Chinese resumption of active hostilities against Taiwan, and unlike 1949, when the Republicans rallied to "Who lost China?"  the current GOP would just roll over like a wet dog if that occured.

But let's assume that the US attempts to do something.  We are still probably able to counter a Chinese seaborne effort, but we aren't going to be in very good shape to counter a missile offensive.  

Crossing the Taiwan Strait is a massive military undertaking.  Even right now China can probably not pull it off.  But it can try it, and if it does, the US can't endure a protracted aerial campaign.  Its not even showing the ability to do it with Iran, and that war will still be going on.

But let's take it one more step.  Can the US fight a sea and air war against China, an air war against Iran, and a ground invasion by North Korea of South Korea?

It's questionable.  And all those countries know that.

And Putin knows that if that occurs, U.S. aid to Ukraine is over.

The Second World War saw Nazi Germany allied to Imperial Japan and democratic Finland.  Wars make strange bedfellows.  All of these countries have relations with each other, and you can bet they're talking.

So, do I think the American President is some sort of odd agent in Russian employment?  Дональд Трамп.  Нелегалы?  No, I don't, but I do think he's stupid, and that stupidity is having disastrous consequences that are about to get much, much worse.  Much worse by October of this year, or perhaps the spring of next year.  Indeed, waiting it out would make strategic sense for China, while hitting in October would make political sense.

Creepy

Trump's relationship with Natalie Harp is approaching being creepy.

We can assume that Harp is an adoring sycophant, as to be employed by Trump, you have to be.  But still.  She apparently wrote him, stating:" You are all that matters to me." and "I don’t ever want to let you down."

Trump calls her “sweetie".

Okay, that doesn't mean that he's obtaining favors from her, but given Trump's track record, it's going to raise questions.  Trump is rumored to have had an affair with Playboy tart Karen McDougal some 20 years ago, when he was 60.  60 isn't young (trust me, I'm 63) but it isn't old either.  That's the same age he was when he reportedly had a one night stand with Stormy Daniels.  He'd been married in the American context to Melanija Knavs for two years at the time.  So if he quit cheating, we have to assume that at age 60 he was fornicating with women prostituting their image for pay (which he denies) twice and then suddenly reformed.  

Maybe.

Well, being a lech at age 60 isn't the same thing as being one at 80.  Harp is 35 and the 45 year age gap would be super creepy and just flat out too creepy for any woman of that age to engage in who wasn't um, a professional.  Besides, at this point it's fairly well established that Trump has an incomitance problem and stinks a lot of the time.

No, Harp is just another creepy fan of Trump's, seeing something in him that isn't there.

And, speaking of creepy.


Nancy Mace has been weird for a while, but she's rocketing to the bottom.

And even creepier.

A Trump speech from two days ago in front of policemen:
Every day I come to the White House, people are thanking me: ‘Thank you, sir. Thank you, thank you, sir,'

You know these young, beautiful girls. These young, beautiful girls. These young, beautiful girls in the White House. You know they come in. Now I'm not supposed to say beautiful, but what the hell?

These young, these gorgeous, beautiful girls — they want to be safe, and they come, 'Mr. President, may I speak to you? Thank you, sir. Thank you’ — I said, ‘Why are you thanking me?’

’Because a year and a half ago, I was afraid to leave. I was afraid to open the door of my apartment, and now I walk to the White House every morning, and I have absolutely no fear.’
Donald Trump.

That never happened, and it's really creepy.  Young beautiful adoring women are coming to Donald Trump and thanking him for making things safe. . . no, they are not.

Some predictions

Well, with all that cheery news, what can we say?

Just this. Things are about to get a lot worse.  As we progress into the fall the oncoming electoral disaster for the GOP is going to become more and more of a crisis for Trump, and he's going to start doing anything he can to steal the election if not outright suspend it.  A war we are losing will still be going on.  The economy is going to start tanking.  Trump's mental state will continue to visibly decline.  Republicans in Congress will continue to do nothing, if not outright support the subversion of democracy.

Related threads:

Donald Trump is a Russian Asset. Дональд Трамп — агент России.




Last edition:

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 150th Edition. Why Karoline is departing. Donald Trump's Weird Obsession with monuments to himself. The Invincibly Ignorant.