Showing posts with label Solar Energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Solar Energy. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2025

Subsidiarity Economics 2025. The Times more or less locally, Part 10. The killing the messenger edition.



August 2, 2025.

Eight months into the year, and our 10th edition for 2025.

Uff.

Mad King Donald fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as he was upset by the Bureau's negative job report, which he stated was rigged.

It was rigged, of course, because facts in Trumpland are rigged if they aren't universally pro Trump.

This is likely to get a lot worse as the fact is that a lot of things Trump has set in motion are going to start having pretty negative consequences.  Likewise, some firmly held GOP beliefs on economics and science aren't going to hold up to reality.

Speaking of reality and the news, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is closing its doors due to the budget rescission.  The CPB, NPR and PBS are separate entities, but this is not a good development.

Republicans, who don't actually seem to realize the three entities are separate from each other, are rejoicing that public funding is ending for "left wing" media, by which they largely mean media that reports reality and the truth, as opposed to propaganda.

August 3, 2025

Three Kentucky distilleries, all small ones, have filed for bankruptcy within the past eight months, with the lastest coming last week.

While I haven't seen any analysis on it, distilleries were particularly worried about the Trump tariffs and, surprise surprise, booze can be made anywhere.  Canadians have pretty much sworn off of US alcohol and were actually a major market.  They make their own anyway.  Seems like Europeans might be doing so also.

And part of this is probably the impact of an artisanal whiskey boom of the last decade fading.

August 5, 2025

Proposal to address ‘nation’s worst workforce exodus’ fails to get support from Wyoming lawmakers: The Wyoming Business Council says it has more policy ideas forthcoming to address "vicious" shrinking workforce conundrum.

August 10, 2025

Some really interesting things are going on that are definitely Wyoming centric that we haven't noted, or haven't noted much, and should.

The first might be that a proposal to put in a nuclear generator construction facility in Natrona County north of the town of Bar Nunn has really turned out to be controversial.  This comes on the heels of a nuclear power plant in Kemmerer that is also controversial.

The ins and outs of the controversy are a little difficult to really discern, but at some level, quite a few people just don't like the idea of something nuclear.  It's not coal, and its not oil.  Chuck Gray, for example, has come out against this and wind energy.  Chuck hasn't worked a day in his life in a blue collar job and he's just tapping into the "no sir, we don't like it" sort of thought here.

What's going to happen?  We'll have to see.

Another local controversy is the approval of a 30 lot subdivision on Casper Mountain.  This has drawn the ire of a lot people who live on Casper Mountain, and most of it is posed in conservation or even environmental terms.

The irony there, of course, is that people who have already built a house on the mountain are somewhat compromised in these arguments.  I get it, however, as I really don't think we need more rural subdivisions in the county, at all.

On the mountain, I'd note that one of the really aggravating things that has happened recently is that last year a joint Federal/State project paved the dirt road on the backside of the mountain to the top of Muddy Mountain.  It didn't need to be done and it just encourages land rapist to built houses on the backside of Casper Mountain.

Natrona County Bans Big Trucks On 26 Roads Amid Gravel Mine Controversy

I understand the opposition here, but in context, things seem to lack consistency.

Which gets back to this, I suppose.  If a person just doesn't want development, they can say that.

What you can't do, however, is pretend that some major pillars of the state's economy are going to be here forever.  The extractive industries are basically on their way out right now.

One of the amusing things about all of this is that the MAGA hat wearers locally who are opposed to nuclear energy are facing it in part due to the current administration.

August 13, 2025

Longtime Wyoming newspaper executives to buy, reopen eight shuttered newspapers: Overjoyed newsroom staff in communities across Wyoming are back on the job with pay after corporate closure laid off 30 employees.

 Trump greenlights 14.5 million-ton coal expansion in Wyoming: The newly accessible tract represents a little more than half of the Antelope mine's annual production but signals more coal mining actions to come.

August 15, 2025

Headline in the CST:

US producer prices surge

And the tariff chickens come home to roost.

One Of Wyoming's First Combo Agriculture-Solar Farm Can’t Find A Buyer For Its Power

Trouble north of the border, where unions remain much stronger than they do here:

Air Canada cancels flights (August 15) due to labor trouble.


Air Canada is facing a flight attendants strike and is basically starting to shut down.

Cynthia Lummis on a comment from the Treasury Secretary saying the US needs to explore ways to buy more Bitcoin:

America needs the BITCOIN Act.

No, it doesn't.  Focus on Wyoming issues and pay attention to them Senator.

August 17, 2025

Social Security Benefits Are an Estimated 8 Years Away From Being Slashed -- and the Cuts Are Even Bigger Than Initially Forecast

August 19, 2025

Federal mineral taxes are being reduced from16.67% to 12.5%.

They had been raised during the Biden Administration.

August 20, 2025

August 23, 2025

Employees at Laramie's Mountain Cement voted to unionize.  They will be joining the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers.

August 30, 2025

Well, there's absolutely no surprise.  Trump's illegal tariffs were affirmed to be illegal.

D'uh.

The Court's decision starts:

The Government appeals a decision of the Court of International Trade setting aside five Executive Orders that imposed tariffs of unlimited duration on nearly all goods from nearly every country in the world, holding that the tariffs were not authorized by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), 50 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. Because we agree that IEEPA’s grant of presidential authority to “regulate” imports does not authorize the tariffs imposed by the Executive Orders, we affirm.

Even here, however, the Court granted a stay of thirty days on the implementation of its order, which a private litigant would be unlikely to have received, and the government shouldn't have received here.  The order should have gone into effect immediately absent the government posting a bond to cover the damages, which would be all the tariffs collected while the matter was on appeal, and all that it has already collected, which should need to be fully refunded.

But a refund won't happen and the implementation of the ruling is delayed by 30 days, so the government can appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which doesn't actually have to take the appeal.

Whether the S.Ct upholds it, or proves to be a pure political arm of the government, is another matter.

There were three dissents in the en banc decision.

September 7, 2025

Postal traffic into the United States dropped by more than 80% after the Trump administration ended a tariff exemption for low-cost imports.

September 9, 2025

Wyoming’s massive new federal coal tract not likely to draw high bids: State and coal industry officials want a new 440 million ton coal tract offered for sale, but opponents warn lease won't benefit public coffers like years past.

Like Star Athletes, WyoTech Grads Recruited For Jobs All Over The Country 

Wyoming Wool Initiative seeks lamb donations for student program

September 13, 2025

Headline from the Trib:

Local board pulls $25M grant application to develop Radiant Nuclear site 

And

Feds fast-track coal mining expansion in southwest Wyoming

And

Court sides with Wyoming utility, rules state should have allowed higher rate increase

Related threads:

The Union Pacific is laying off carmen in Green River and may be closing the shop there.

September 24, 2025

Apparently US immigration raids have caused Michelob Ultra, which is gross, to become the most popular beer in the U.S., displacing Corona, which is gross, for the last 12 months.

September 25, 2025

From the Trib:

Wyoming unemployment falls to 3.2% in August 2025

And the Cowboy State Daily:

The General Services Administration is attempting to rehire hundreds of employees laid off by Elon Musk's moronic Dipshit DOGE.

September 26, 2025

More tariffs.  100% tariff pharmaceuticals, 30% tariff on upholstered furniture, 50% tariff on kitchen cabinets and bathroom vanities, and a 30% tariff on heavy trucks. 

September 30, 2025

The Trump administration plans to open more than 13 million acres of federal land for leasing for coal and provide $625 million in funds to expand power generation from coal, the latter a blatantly socialist move, but apparently Republicans are okay with Socialism now.

In Wyoming, The West Antelope III coal lease will go to competitive auction on Oct. 8.

These will prove to be carbon laden farts in a windstorm as coal will continue to decline, but the action will be damaging to long term power generation and the climate.

Cattle prices are reported to be at a record high.

October 1, 2025

Powell Valley Healthcare is shutting down its oncology services and its internal medicine clinic in Cody  as a way to remain economically sustainable.

Casper air travel should continue during federal shutdown, but ripple effects loom

 

Casper air travel should continue during federal shutdown, but ripple effects loom

October 3, 2025

October 6, 2025

(LETTER) Bob Ide personally benefits from his property tax cuts

October 9, 2025

Hard liquor exports to Canada are down 85% this year.

October 11, 2025

The master negotiator got the big middle finger salute from China over his trade policies and now Trump is threatening 100% tariffs on the country.

Markets are reacting badly.

October 13, 2025

China indicated it wasn't backing down on the tariff matter.

Last edition:

Subsidiarity Economics 2025. The Times more or less locally, Part 9. Waist Deep in the Big Muddy. It's Donald Trump's economy now.

Saturday, October 4, 2025

NIMBY? State Board of Land Commissioners denies Prism Logistics lease renewal on Casper Mountain and other ponderings.

This is an interesting story.

State Board of Land Commissioners denies Prism Logistics lease renewal on Casper Mountain

I'm glad this isn't going forward.  It shouldn't, because of where it's located.

But because of where its located is where it drew attention.

In Natrona County, over the past year, residents have risen up in opposition to this gravel mine, a proposed solar farm in the western end of the county, and a proposed nuclear generator manufacturing facility north of Casper.  In Gillette there's some sort of controversy going on over some sort of nuclear facility.  And there's a big debate on a wind farm in Laramie County.

It's hard to know what to make of all of this.

What is clear is that local politicians respond to the controversies.  I'm sure if you asked any one of the Natrona  County Commissioners if they supported energy, they would say yes.  And they'd all say they support mining.  But when the votes come, they're voting like they're members of Greenpeace. 


And one local legislature says that his nickname is now "No nuke" for his opposition to the nuclear generator facility.

Nuclear energy is the safest and most efficient form of power generation we have, and until the mysteries of fission are unlocked, if ever, it'll continue to be.  In a rational world we'd have a five year plan to replace every coal burning plant in the country with nuclear power.

Indeed, going one step further, we'd mandate the retirement of petroleum fueled everything in that time frame, or perhaps ten years.


The reason we don't is because, for the most part, even though we're the smartest animal on the planet, we're not anywhere near as smart as we like to think we are.  If we were, we'd make decisions based on logic.  Most people don't.  Most people make decisions based on emotion.

It's easy to understand why a person would emotionally resent a gravel pit in their backyard, more or less, or solar panels taking up acres of land.  The same with windmills.  Nuclear? Well, the opposition to nuclear is due to our having used the bomb to murder thousands of Japanese civilians.  It's stuck with us and we fear it, as that was our first use of it.  People will tell you they are worried about contamination and the like. Bah.  It's Hiroshima and Nagasaki they're worried about, even though that can't happen.

I'm old enough to remember when we had open pit uranium mining in Wyoming.  In the early 1980s I knew a few guys who worked out at the Shirley Basin mine site, including one who lived in the little, now abandoned, town of Shirley Basin.  I also knew some who lived and worked in Jeffrey City, where they worked in uranium mines.  When they closed down, the state was distraught.

Now it seems nobody remembers that, and the thought of anything nuclear drives people into fits of despair.

I think a lot of it is fear of change.

That in fact explains a lot about populism  And it explains why the current heavily right wing populist in Natrona County are adamantly against something that the populists in Washington D.C. reading Uglier Home and Paved Garden are for.

Change, we're told, is inevitable.  If it is, it's because we will it so, much of it through our absolute laziness.  We want our lives to be easier and more convenient just for us, but at the same time we want things to stay the way they are.

Which for a person like me, whose an introverted, introspective, agrarian, is particularly amusing in some ways.

I really hate change, myself, and I also want things to be the way they were.  But not five or ten years ago, like so many of the people who protest on these matters.  Indeed, many are quite new imports.

Victor Colorado, 1900.  One of these houses was my great grandparents'.

I'd like them to be like they were in 1879 when my family first arrived in this region. . . or even earlier if possible.  I'd settle for 1963, when I personally arrived.

I won't get those wishes.

I will note, however, a nuclear powered America might look more like American in 1879 than the one of 2025 does.  As I look out at all the protests I'm struck by how many people in Wyoming are absolutely wedded to the oil and gas industry.  It wasn't always so.

Back in the 1960s (I have a long memory) a lot of locals remained pretty skeptical about the oil and gas industry, in part because the state had recently been shafted for its reliance upon petroleum.  People loved it again in the 1970s but when that boom collapsed people swore to never be reliant upon it again.

We apparently got over that.

Now we fear what we know to be true.  Petroleum and coal won't last forever.  The dirty little secret of the petroleum industry in Wyoming anymore is that drilling is really for gas far more than petroleum oil.  Petroleum is on the way out, like it or not, and the United States is an expensive oil and gas province to drill in.  Absent actually prohibiting its import, which I wouldn't put past Donald Trump, Saudi petroleum will always be cheaper.  For that matter, Russian petroleum will always be as well and thinking you can really prohibit India China from importing it is absolute folly.  Coal, which we've dealt with extensively, in a slow but accelerating death spiral.

The sort of imaginary world so many in MAGA wish to return to.  Big powerful cars, driven by guys of course, but at the same time don't want to return to, as living without as much as these people did, compared to us, would be uncomfortable.

Donald Trump may say "drill baby drill", and put thousands of acres up for coal leasing, but Trump in many ways is the last dying gasp of of the 1950s.

And the 50s of our imaginations never existed.  But we fear that it didn't, as we fear the thought that our oil stained hands will reach the point where we'll have to grab a bar of Lava soap and scrub it off, forever.  The jobs will go away.

Funny thing is, from time to time, there's been serious proposals to put in something related to local agriculture, which was here in the beginning of our statehood, and still is.  Wyoming hadn't really supported a big ag project since the 1930s, and indeed local municipalities oppose things related to agriculture.  It's short sighted.

But then, perhaps I'm romantic about for various reasons that recent migrants to the state don't share.


Saturday, April 13, 2024

Subsidiarity Economics 2024. The times more or less locally, Part I. And then the day arrived (part two).

Our lifestyle, our wildlife, our land and our water remain critical to our definition of Wyoming and to our economic future.

Dave Freudenthal, former Governor of Wyoming/

 

January 2, 2024

The Energy Information Administration’s Short Term Energy Outlook Report states that combined generation from wind and solar will overtake generation from coal by more than 90 billion kilowatt-hours this year.

US coal production will drop to its lowest amount since the 1960s, with it taking more miners per ton to produce in the 60s than it does now.

Pennsylvania's Flying Fish Brewing Co. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

January 11, 2024

January 17, 2024

From the Trib:

According to a report put out by the Wyoming State Geological Survey this month, the state’s oil production has not yet surpassed its 2019 high, while nationwide oil production has surpassed pre-pandemic levels.

More than 95 million barrels of oil are expected to be produced in Wyoming in 2023, which is about 3 million more barrels than in 2022. The drilling of new oil wells has helped greatly.

In the first half of 2023, a total of 110 newly drilled oil wells were completed, most of them in the Powder River Basin. This is in line with the first half of 2022, when 118 oil wells were completed.

January 22, 2024

Flying Fish Brewing has declared bankruptcy.

January 23, 2024

U.S. oil production has been holding at or near record highs since October, topping the previous peak from 2020, even though the number of active domestic oil drilling rigs is down by nearly 30% from four years ago.

New technology is the reason why there is higher production with fewer rigs.

And also:

The U.S. set a new annual oil production record on December 15, based on data from the Energy Information Administration. Although the official monthly numbers from the EIA won’t be released for a couple of months, we can calculate that a new record has been set based on the following analysis.

Prices at the pump have been declining.

January 25, 2024

In spite of repeated Republican declarations about how bad the economy is doing, the economy grew 4.9% in the third quarter of 2023, for which the latest figures are out.  This grossly exceeds expectations.

This is interesting for a lot of reasons, one of which the "bad economy" is a consistent theme of Republicans in the current election cycle, when in fact this is a classic "good economy".  It's frankly bizarre.

Some of that might reflect, however, an ongoing retention of a return to the 1945-1975 economy by Rust Belt voters, and anxiety over an inevitable decline in the fossil fuel economy in the West.  The post-war economy is of course never returning, and the change in the direction in the energy economy cannot be arrested, although it too is doing well right now.

January 28, 2024

The Administration plans on providing billions for microchip subsidies for US producers to assure production can be made in the US.

It's worth noting that with war looming with China, there's more than one reason to do this.

The Biden Administration has paused all pending export licenses for liquified national gas (LNG) to consider the climate impacts.

February 8, 2024

Getting Wall Street out of our houses

February 10, 2024

US Credit Card debt is at an all-time high.

World's Foremost Authority On Solar Sheep Advising Wyoming $500 Million Solar Farm

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs


February 11, 2024


It is estimated that over 10% of Canadian craft brewers will close this year.

February 13, 2024

The city of Gillette and BWXT have agreed to work together to look at the possibility of having nuclear facilities and operations in Gillette 

February 15, 2024

While this should be no surprise, given what we earlier reported here:


Remington, in its new form, will close its facilities in Ilion, New York, in March.

Colorado has filed suit to stop the Kroger Albertson's merger.

February 21, 2024

Japan's Nikkei stock index soared to an all-time high.

Rivian, the electric truck maker, is laying off 10% of its salaried staff.

This will cause piles of cackling from those who are convinced electric vehicles, which have taken off, will never take off.  Rivian was an automotive start-up, something that's really tough to do.  Basically, their business model depended on getting into the saturated truck market before other maker went to electric, a real gamble.

Wyoming Gets a Big Win in Court for Coal 

 

CHEYENNE, Wyo. –Wyoming’s coal industry’s earned a long-awaited legal win today, as three Ninth Circuit judges unanimously sided with Wyoming’s arguments in support of the continuation of the federal coal-leasing program. The decision vacated a lower court order that reinstated Obama-era coal-leasing restrictions and required federal officials to perform duplicative National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis. 

“This ruling is an unequivocal win for our coal industry and a reminder that the Biden Administration has to follow the law,” Governor Mark Gordon said. “The Department of Interior now has one less excuse to thwart its federal coal leasing responsibilities. I appreciate the Attorney General and her staff for their excellent work on this case.” 

The complicated case spanned seven years and involved conflicting orders issued by former Interior Secretaries, in which Secretary Jewel issued an order to cease federal coal leasing and conduct a Programmatic Environmental Statement on the entire coal leasing program. Before that review was complete, Secretary Zinke rescinded the Jewel Order so coal leasing could resume; lastly Secretary Haaland rescinded the Zinke order. The district court ruled that the Department of the Interior needed to conduct additional NEPA analysis before resuming coal leasing under its existing authorities.  Wyoming argued that the case was moot, because the Zinke order was rescinded by Secretary Haaland.

Litigation costs for Wyoming were covered by the Federal Natural Resource Policy Account as directed by Governor Gordon.   

-END-

March 15, 2024

Nippon Steel proposes to take over U.S. Steel.

March 17, 2024

Tyson, the giant chicken corporation, announced that it's closing a plant in Iowa in June which will result in 1200 people, 15% of the entire town, losing their jobs. Simultaneously, the company is working with an asylum advocate group to hire 2,500 asylum seekers who are cleared to work elsewhere.

Um. . . we've been running a series on our companion blog entitled An Agrarian Manifesto. . . might be worth reading, perhaps particularly these:

A sort of Agrarian Manifesto. What's wrong with the world (and how to fix it). Part 2. Distributism


A sort of Agrarian Manifesto. What's wrong with the world (and how to fix it). Part 5. What would that look like, and why would it fix anything, other than limiting my choices and lightening my wallet? The Distributist Impact

March 21, 2024

Reddit is going public.

March 22, 2024

The Justice Department is suing Apple for Antitrust violations arising from its iPhones.

March 26, 2024

Trader Joe's is raising the price of bananas for the first time in twenty years.

March 27, 2024

Texas based and 7-11 owned USA Gasoline stores have closed in Wyoming.

March 28, 2024

Only the Northern Arapaho Tribe and the city of Cheyenne applied for portions of the $4.6 billion Federal fund to reduce reliance on carbon emissions-heavy energy sources and to become more economically resilient.

Fisker is cutting the prices of its electric Ocean SUV by 39%.

April 1, 2024

Gold hit $2,262.19/oz.

April 8, 2024

The price of oil dropped 1%.

April 11, 2024

The Aerodrome: “It stinks, like bad medicine going down, it’s a h...: So stated a Casper City Councilman about extending an additional $400,000 to SkyWest Delta to anchor the flight to Salt Lake City from Caspe...

April 12, 2024 

April 13, 2024

And gold hit a record again.

Last Prior Edition:

Subsidiarity Economics. The times more or less locally, Part XVI. And then the day arrived.


Recent Related Threads:



Tuesday, November 7, 2023

Wednesday, November 7, 1973. Congress overrides Nixon's veto of the War Powers Act.

 Congress overrode President Nixon's veto of the War Powers Act.


The resolution was a direct byproduct of the Vietnam War, with Congress feeling that it had basically been led into war without a proper chance to vote on troop deployments to the conflict, although it had voted on the murky Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.  The still relatively fresh Korean War was also in mind.

The Constitutionality of the act, which as been questioned, has never been tested by the Supreme Court.  So far, however, Congress and the President have generally complied with it, not wanting to test it, even though early on President's would note that they felt it to be unconstitutional.  This is discussed further with a link here:

November 7, 1973 – Congress Passes the War Powers Act

Nixon addressed the nation on "The Energy Emergency".



It's fair  to ask in a way if the "Energy Crisis" presented a lost opportunity.

Even in 1973, contrary to the way some would like to assert it, there were concerns in the scientific community about climate change.  When the Energy Crisis arose due to the Arab Oil Embargo there was a serious effort to look at alternative energy sources, although nothing like there is today, and it was coupled with a massive effort to increase the production of domestic fossil fuels.  Solar energy was looked at seriously for the first time.  A lot of thought was put into home solar.  Energy saving regulations, in regard to appliances, and fuel efficiency standards were put into place as well.

Had the government gone further, and moved towards home solar in a large-scale way, and undertook efforts then to look towards conversion to non emitting energy sources, we may well have avoided what we're looking at today.

The Cape Krusenstern Archaeological District in Alaska was designated.


About the location, the National Park Service notes:

Cape Krusenstern Archaeological District - Designated November 7, 1973

Monday, October 26, 2020

Blog Mirror & Commentary: For Wyo’s untaxed generations, the ‘free ride’ may be over

For Wyo’s untaxed generations, the ‘free ride’ may be over

So declares a headline on WyoFile.

This articles has an interesting item about Wyoming's tax system prior to the severance tax, that being:

I'd never heard that.  I do recall that at the time people were upset about the severance tax, or at least a lot of legislators were, as there was fear that it would end coal production in Wyoming.  The article notes that:

Wyoming legislators at the time, like future Gov. Ed Herschler and future U.S. Sen. Alan Simpson, initially opposed the governor’s severance tax proposal. But when Hathaway challenged them to figure out an alternative, they admitted they couldn’t, and they passed the tax.

I'll be frank.  I don't know what to do regarding Wyoming's state budgetary woes.  I'll note, however, that so far the state has been unwilling to look at anything much which was based on the hope that things would return to "normal".  Wyomingites are acclimated to looking at taxation this way.  Indeed, we used to proudly hear that Wyoming had "500 years" worth of coal resources, whatever that meant.

What now seems plain is that coal is on a long term systemic slide.  Indeed, it was even at the time we started to first tax it.  It's becoming additionally clear that petroleum may be entering an analogous condition, something we would have regarded as simply impossible only a few years ago.  Petroleum production was increasing on a massive scale a decade or less ago, of course, and that could come back.  But something is changing.  Within the last few years, indeed within the present Administration, the country was proud of having reclaimed its status as an energy exporter for the first time in decades.  Now, however, a Saudi Arabia/Russian price decline, combined with oversupply (which has decreased this year) has made the market highly valuable.  More significantly, however, there's very open talk at the national level of a technological phase out of petroleum as a motor vehicle fuel.  

That, as a technological matter, seemed like an absurd suggestion itself until only recently.  But now electric cars are coming on strong.  Ford is introducing an electric Mustang and has an electric F150 slated for 2022 or 2023.  General Motors is introducing a light electric truck under the Hummer name.  Chrysler has been pretending to hold back, having a sector of the truck market that is slated towards heavy trucks, which electric vehicles have not yet penetrated, but at the same time its introducing an electric Jeep.  If Ford makes headway in the light industrial market with its F150 Chrysler will jump in, it'll have to.

Critics still scoff at the vehicle developments, and there are some real problems there.  The one we hear here is that they don't have the range to be useful for the state's vast distances, but they're starting too.  Indeed, while its never noted, their present range frankly exceeds that of early gasoline engined vehicles, the real difference being, of course, that you could take your fuel with you in the latter case.  But they're developing rapidly. I have a range of 600 miles or so in my diesel 1 ton pickup, which compares with an advertised low 300s with the new Hummer, so the electrics aren't there yet, but they'll soon be.  If nothing else, they're exploring what the market is and will start capturing sections of it soon.

The real irony of electric vehicles, which isn't missed by their critics, is that they're not really all that green in that they're not really necessarily "zero emissions". Indeed, electric vehicle are, if you will, energy vampires in that they suck their energy from something else generating it, as opposed to petroleum fueled vehicles which carry their own power plants.  In the case of electric vehicles, they're only as green as the remote power plant that produced the energy they store in their batteries.

In fairness, that's become greener over the years, which takes us back to the story of coal.  Coal's been heavily supplanted by natural gas, which requires drilling, we'd note.  There should be, therefore, continued drilling for gas in the U.S. and indeed their has to be, as its largely non transported save by pipelines.

The dream, of course, of Green New Dealers is green electrical generation, and that has been coming on in the form of now viable wind and solar.  Indeed, in this area I continue to hear from those who don't want any changes that wind isn't economically viable.  Oh yes it is, and it has been for some time.

What would really push electricity for transportation over the top is nuclear energy.  The fact that greens don't support it shows how unrealistic people could be.  The US could generate 100% of its electrical needs through nuclear and its much safer than coal in real terms.  Indeed, the US could have surplus capacity through nuclear energy even it it required the electrification of the railroads.  Joe Biden spoke, in the recent debate, of having the US switched over to electric vehicles by 2035.  I'm not suggesting it, but a real "New Deal" type program involving nuclear energy could do it in less than less than half that time.

Uranium is mined in Wyoming, or it was, so there would be some hope of regaining a revenue source there, if reason prevailed.  Absent that, we're going to have to start taxing wind and solar, but we can't at a rate that would harm them as new entities. There have been proposals to do that, but once again they're sometimes advanced by people who really simply hope to kill them, which really would achieve what the opponents of Stan Hathaway feared in the late 1960s, driving an industry elsewhere.  Right now we don't know how much money there will come to be in those sources.  It might be quite a bit, and perhaps that will solve our budget woes.

Or maybe it won't.  Indeed, it probably won't.

So what then?

It's interesting that agriculture carried the freight before the extractive industries. And that likely was as it was making more money per capita than it does now.  Some serious examination should be given to reviving that situation while we still have the money to do so.  Long term economic planning doesn't seem to be our forte, however, or we would have picked up the Occidental lands while we could have, which we didn't.  We've noted that here before.

Where we're headed in the country right now with agricultural commodities is really hard to say.  The United States has had a "cheap food" policy since after World War Two and it appears intent on keeping it.  Cheap food is great for everyone, but it's greater for those consuming than those producing and its driven agricultural consolidation and monoculture.  One thing Wyoming could do is to try to boost the mid and downstream aspects of agriculture, which we haven't done much of. That is, we don't have large commercial meat packing here, we don't have wool mills and so on. That may seem like not much, but it could be a lot, if done right.

If we're talking about agriculture and taxes, of course, we're into a new area that I didn't explore before.  And if we're talking ag, what that means is that we're really looking at a mixed tax base, based on taxing production.  Indeed, taxing wind and solar (and severance taxes) is really the same thing, but this would be on a broader basis.

Prior suggestions to tax production of every kind has been really hostilely received, however.  Certainly a proposal to tax services, such as legal services, was hugely opposed some years ago.

About the only things left to tax, however, is land and income.  There's little support for taxing property rates at an increased level, but I do have to wonder what would be the case if it was graduated. An effort like that would be specifically designed to tax the extremely wealthy and I suspect most Wyomingites would welcome that at some level. As far as I know, that's never been suggested so there's no way to know.  People might resent the suggestion as unfair.

That leaves income taxes, which there is no present support to impose.  I suppose it also leaves sales taxes, which there's no support to increase.

None of which addresses the cost of government itself.  With no money, it'll have to shrink, there's no other choice.  And given where we're presently at in this discussion, that seems inevitable.  But how that will be done is yet to be seen.  We will, I think, be seeing it in the very near future.

Which takes us back to the 1960s.  

I was around in the 1960s, to be sure, but I don't recall much about state government and its funding woes.  Shoot, I was seven years old when 1970 arrived, so I wouldn't.

I'd guess that the budget problems persisted into the early 1970s, but again, I don't recall much about that sort of thing.  How much smaller was our government back then?

It's something we should begin to ask.  At the state level, rather than the Federal one, everything has to be paid for. The state passed up on acquiring economic land, which will likely be to our huge regret really rapidly.  We could likely have brought in large sums through it, but now we won't.  And we don't have any immediately clear path out of where we are.  That may mean a return to budgets of the past.

But what does that mean?


The Wyoming Economy. Looking at it in a different way.