Showing posts with label National Conservatism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Conservatism. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

25th Amendment Watch, 20th Edition. The Frontotemporal Dementia Edition.

The Lunatic of Étretat

Donald Trump has convinced himself that somebody is sabotaging the reflecting pool because the algae is back.  He's deployed the National Guard and the Park police, and the police have been issuing a few citations to people who are taking pieces of floating Rhino Lining.


A Little Science

What's going on here?

Well, it sure ain't sabotage.

In terms of the actual situation, what's going on is basic science.  Any kid in advance studies in high school, or  probably junior high, could have replicated the result theoretically with very little effort.

The reflecting is a large pool of pretty much stable, which is not to say stagnant, water.  Still water, in other words.  In warm weather, any large body of still water will develop algae and in some areas experience algae blooms.  Just go to some local cow ponds and take a look, you'll see algae.

Algae is, also, a great lover of CO2.  Indeed, it's a tremendous friend to humanity as its capable of sucking up so much CO2.  In a distant prior era of the Earth's history there was a time when the oceans were pretty much one gigantic algae bloom. The era ended as the algae sucked so much algae out, over a long period of time, it depressed the Earth's temperature and caused a massive ice age.

As more and more CO2 gets pumped into the atmosphere temperatures get hotter and algae loves it.  All the Chuck Grays weeing in their pants about climate change being a big isn't going to change it. You may not care about science, and science may not care about you.  It just wrecks things when you stupidly ignore it.

When the recent Rhino Lining was done, another thing that was done was to change the water source for the pool.  The water system had sourced water from the Tidal Basin, but it was switched to municipal water on the thought it would be clearer. That thought was a good one, as it should be.  The Park Service had planned on doing something along these lines for years.  As it is, the pool's water is circulated through piping to a building nearby and run through a series of filters and water purifiers. The Park Service had wanted to put in a "nano bubbler" to kill algae with tiny bubbles of ozone.  There were a series of contractors that asked for that very job.

Well, Donald Trump became fascinated at some point with Washington D.C.'s appearance, and perhaps not without some justification.  Some monuments had in fact, apparently, been allowed to become run down, and some fountains disconnected. That is in fact inexcusable and his efforts, giving credit where credit is due, have lead to the restoration of some of these features.  Infamously, of course, it also lead the absolute vandalization of the White House, both in the cheap tacky crap that Trump pasted up everywhere, as well as in the ripping down of an entire wing.  The cheap crap can be pulled off and tossed in the dumpster, but the demolishing of a wing is another problem entirely.

Then there's the pool.

Any smart person would have hired an engineering firm to deal with the problem if something needed to be done.  Not Trump.  He just had a no bid process done and sent the work to a contractor on a no bid process, something that's only supposed to be used for emergencies. Frankly, in my view, that was illegal. There was no emergency.  But Trump wanted it to look purty for the 250th Anniversary of American Independence, an ironic thing as he is the very model of aristocratic dolt that the country was seeking separation from in 1776.

At a bare minimum, the water system should have been shocked to kill residual algae.

Well, the results were predictable.  The Rhino Lining was put in, an abomination in and of itself, the water got hot, and algae came for the party.  To compound the matter, it was decided to pour hydrochloric acid in the pool to kill the algae, which instead had the result of peeling up the fresh Rhino Lining.  Trump can't admit failure, even though he has had a boatload of them, and even though a major failure, a lost war against Iran, should be his primary concern right now, he's focused on the pool, having people arrested for vandalization.

He is, in fact, the vandal.

Frontotemporal dementia, an unfortunate primer.

Trump is afflicted with Frontotemporal dementia.

I've seen Frontotemporal dementia up close in personal.  I don't say that lightly.

My mother developed the disease late in her life.  She was 90 years old when she died.  In looking it up, I was shocked to realize that it is now just a little over a decade ago.  I thought it was further back than that.

Anyhow, it's a horrible disease.

I can't really recall exactly when it became evident that she had it, and that's one of the problems with FTD.  The disease is really slow moving and therefore its early manifestation may be baffling and unrecognized to those who are near the person afflicted.  According to the May Clinic, it usually starts to hit people relatively early, when they are in their 40s and 50s, but may occur later.  Looking back, my mother may actually have started to manifest her symptoms in the normal age range, but in her case it was masked, if it did, by another condition that was nearly incapacitating.  She got in a few, but very few, good years between recovering from that and the onset of the disease.

Mayo states:

Early symptoms of frontotemporal dementia

These often involve changes in behavior, personality or language rather than memory. These symptoms may be mistaken for a mental health condition at first.

Early symptoms may include:

Behavioral changes in frontotemporal dementia

The most common symptoms of frontotemporal dementia involve extreme changes in behavior and personality. These include:

Speech and language symptoms

Some subtypes of frontotemporal dementia lead to changes in language ability or loss of speech. Subtypes include primary progressive aphasia (PPA), including the semantic variant and the nonfluent or agrammatic variant.

These conditions can cause:

Primary progressive apraxia of speech is a brain condition that mainly affects how speech is produced, which is distinct from an aphasia. People with the condition know exactly what they want to say, but the brain has increasing difficulty planning and coordinating the movements of the lips, tongue and jaw needed to speak. As a result, speech may sound slow, effortful, choppy or distorted, even though understanding, reading and thinking may not be affected early on.

Movement symptoms

Rare subtypes of frontotemporal dementia cause movements similar to those seen in Parkinson's disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Movement symptoms may include:

Frontotemporal dementia versus Alzheimer's disease dementia

Frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease are both types of dementia, but they affect the brain in different ways.

Frontotemporal dementia often begins at a younger age, usually between ages 40 and 65. Alzheimer's disease is more common in older adults.

Memory loss may not be an early symptom. In Alzheimer's disease, memory loss is often one of the first symptoms.

Frontotemporal dementia is sometimes mistaken for a mental health condition or Alzheimer's disease, especially in early stages.

Sometimes the clinical features of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease overlap and can lead to a hard time diagnosing the condition.

A couple of problems with the disease is that its rare for one person to exhibit all the symptoms.  

My mother was an extremely physically fit person before she fell ill, and recovered that once she recovered.  This was the case even into her decline into dementia for a long time.  As part of that, she had a very strong routine that helped mask and even control the decline.  As it started off, you could tell that she wasn't right, but not to the extent that it was apparent what was going on by any means.

Then the obsessions came.

That's where Donald Trump is at right now.

My mother became obsessed with snow, and overweight people.  We living in a snowy region, in normal years, and she came from an even snowier one.  But one winter arrived and she could not stand the presence of snow.  She shoveled the lawn.  I repeatedly tried to get her to stop doing it, but she wouldn't. 

The house became a mess, but she'd also destructively clean some thing, including things that didn't belong to her. She really went after, for example the finish on a muscle car I had at the time.  

She commented on people being "fat" constantly, and lost any filter she had about it and would comment about it anywhere.  Indeed, she lost her speaking filter in general.

Throughout this decline she lived on her own.  It would have been impossible for a person to live with her at some point.  As things grew worse I knew that I needed to do something, but frankly doing something is easier said than done.  Or perhaps I was just cowardly about it.  At any rate, she took up keeping spoiled meat and it made her extremely sick. That put her in the hospital, and an ER doc diagnosed her on the spot, and to her face, which was a blessing.

After that the decline just got worse and worse, but again, it was slow.  I can't remember how long she was in assisted living.  A few years, anyway.  Eventually her heart gave out.

Where Donald Trump is at

Trump is now at that obsessive stage.  He's absolutely fixated on some trivial things, those things being architectural monuments.  He can get through days and even be fairly lucid, but at night it comes back.  He's sick.  Like my mother shoveling snow from the lawn, he can't grasp the reality of algae in a pool.  

He's also lost his filter with and about women, like my mother did with overweight people.  He's always had a predatory relationship with women anyhow, and this turns out to be a classic aspect of male dementia.  I recall when my mother was dying of dementia reading an article by a female newspaper columnist whose father was enduring the same thing.  It's a nightmare for the adult child, and she was openly wishing for the death of her father.  She hated to visit him in the nursing home, and frankly I hated to visit my mother in assisted living.  In her case, her very elderly father had pretty much forgotten who she was, that never occurred to my mother, but she forgot other things, had her mother died, for instance, and how to speak English on one occasion, and her father had become obsessive about sex, even asking if the daughter knew anyone who might have sex with him.

As noted that's actually fairly common in male dementia.  Demented men slide into sexual depravity in some instances due to the disease.  Trump arrived at sexual depravity all on his own early on, but now he's routinely calling women whom he should respect insulting names, or worse yet, pet names.  He can't keep from commenting on their appearance.

This is all going to get much worse.

What's to be done?

As the few people who stop in here routinely know, I've long been of the opinion that Trump was mentally declining and now that it's obvious what he has, it's pretty apparent that he was exhibiting signs of it his first term.  Indeed, you can go back to his earlier interviews and find a much different, albeit never admirable, person.  The disease has robbed him of his sanity.

The people around him know this.  His cabinet from his first term have been open about the horrors they experienced, although some of them leading into the last election still supported him.  Susan Wiles is apparently at the exasperated point.  Apparently even Scott Bessent, a complete toady, has been leaking.

Given that his condition is so apparent for those who can see it, I thought the 25th Amendment would be invoked this month.  It still maybe, or maybe later, but it now appears that something else is going on.

One of the things that is going on, I suspect, is that National Conservatives are riding Trump as far as they can up to the November election.  They dream of an all white, all Christian, illiberal democracy they cannot win at the ballot box.  Viktor Orbán was their poster child.*  J. D. Vance is their candidate.  Vance can't get elected without being elevated to the Oval Office during Trump's term, but he also can't be seen doing the dirty work, much of which remains to be done.  Worst of all, however, from a NatCon prospective, maybe Vance, who has had many names and been many people in his short life, might not be a NatCon after all.  He has to be tested in the fire, and that fire is occurring right now.

Of course, Marco Rubio needs Vance consumed by that fire, and so far the fire has mostly been consuming him.  Rubio, however, will never be the NatCon choice.  His background is too suspicious.  Indeed, he's been a fair number of other things in his life, and his path through it is not as linear as Vance's.

If all this sounds pretty fish, I get it.  But again, I have experience with it.  When a person begins to decline, you find that people will step in to take advantage of them.  I had that occur as my mother declined. And other people are there to give you bad advice, often because that serves their own interest or world views.  I was lucky in that I had so much help from my family, including family members who my mother had not been nice to.

In Trump's case, I don't know that there is anyone at all who is actually his friend.  He doesn't appear to have any outside of his immediate family.  Maybe his family are his friends, maybe.  Melania Trump apparently divides her time between Florida and New York and has a reputation as being a helicopter mother over her one child, Barron. As we've posted elsewhere as recently as today, we're frankly skeptical of this match being a normal love match.  Trump's 24 years older, and even bigger margin than existed between Trump and Marla Maples, who was 18 years his junior.  Maples seems to be more of a real match, but I could be way of the mark.  It does seem certain that her interest in her son is genuine, however.  Anyhow, in Melania we don't see an Edith Wilson by a long shot.

Of course there are Trump's sons and daughters by his prior marriages.  But none of them are hanging around on a daily basis making sure their father doesn't fall down and not get up.

There are the MAGA sycophants of course.  Some of these people are NatCons, so they're in the NatCon camp.  Others are useful idiots for the NatCons.  Some are just weirdos and oddballs, or people with unique agendas. They have nowhere else to go.  Should Trump slump over and fall to sleep forever today, J. D. Vance is not going to keep Bessent, Lutnik, Kennedy, Miller or Hegseth around, and they know it.  They have nowhere else to go.  So they are, truly, like the Germans who rode it out in Hitler's bunker.  Not out of conviction, but because the 3d Shock Army is outside.

For the good of the country, the 25th Amendment needs to be invoked.  Will it?  Well, we thought it would, and if we're right about the NatCons, there's a chance that it will be. They have to know that if they don't invoke it, when November comes their only chance of obtaining their dream illiberal state is basically a coup.  Trump can undoubtedly be talked into it, and many of the street level MAGAs can be relied upon to be Trump's SA, or put in the current zeitgeist, the king's own loyalist militia.  But most people aren't going there, and the reaction would be huge.

In a very real sense, many in the thinking categories discussed above hope that Trump will just experience what Jimi Hendrix sang and that he "may wake up in the morning, to find that he is dead".  He'd be off to the particular judgment in the next world and they'd cynically lament him in this, while installing J. D. as his successor, and latching on to the pliant wails of the extraordinarily easily lead MAGA masses.  Indeed, if they have reason to believe that this is soon, that's the best strategy of all.

If Trump simply passes, they have their ride to the treasury made easy.

In the meantime, this is phenomenally scary, and sad.  Trump's an old man with a very heavy burden of sin whom nobody is doing anything to address in an existential sense.  He's raving in his dementia, mostly at night.  Those advancing their own agendas, if I'm right, are comfortable with the increasing insanity and destruction this all brings.

June 23, 2026

Politics

June 24, 2026

Simply weird beyond belief:

The President of the United States:
0:03 / 0:04

Footnotes

*It's Giorgia Meloni who has actually risen over the past two years to replace Orbán and Trump as the leader of the intellectual wing of National Conservatism, but she's not an illiberal democrat.

Last edition:

King Donald's War, Part 8 and CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist 140th Edition, 25th Amendment Watch Nineteenth Edition: L'arche De La Défaite Édition

Monday, June 22, 2026

2026 Elections In Other Countries.

April 13, 2026


Trump's endorsement again turned out to be a predicator that the endorsed candidate would go down in well deserved flames as Péter Magyar defeated the illiberal democrat darling of the far right Viktor Orbán.

Also a figure of the Hungarian right, and in fact once an Orbán protege, he is a sign that even in a country that's be converted into the model of an illiberal democracy and hence adored by the Heritage Foundation set, a corrupt autocrat can come down.  He's also a sign that support by Trump means nothing in much of the world, and is becoming meaningless in the United States.

Orbán, who is not insane as Trump is much of the time, does deserve credit for conceding defeat.

April 14, 2026

Canadian liberals gained a majority in the Canadian parliament through by elections yesterday.

While less clear, the Donald Trump Effect, i.e., repulsion over his vile politics, is moving everything to the left that's associated with him.

June 22, 2026


Colombian Trump backed right-wing candidate Abelardo de la Espriella narrowly won Colombia's presidential election, apparently.

Last edition:

2025 Elections In Other Countries.

Saturday, June 13, 2026

Donald Trump: "I love the inflation". What if this isn't quite as crazy as it sounds (while still being really darned scary).


$100 when this bond was issued had the spending power of $1,892.16 today.

How did the U.S. pay off much of the debt from the Second World War and the Cold War?

It inflated the economy out of it.

Let me note something here right from the onset.  I think Donald Trump is suffering from dementia in a major way and doesn't come up with plans for anything on his own, very often.  Put another way, I think he's a puppet at this stage, pulled by National Conservative and Populist strings, the two not being the same.

Which brings me to this.  

What if, behind the scenes, somebody on the NatCon end has come up with the plan to inflate the economy and steal as much of the petroleum oil belonging to Venezuela and Iran as possible.

It'd be way sinister, and evil, and destroy the lives and savings of many, but it might work.

But it'll be devastating to individuals.

Here's how it might works.

Raise tariffs to the point where domestic production actually is increased.  That would make everything much more expensive, and hence inflation would result.  Putting US oil increasingly on the global market would do the same, as that only happens when the price of oil is high.  The value of the debt would decrease as the value of money would decrease.

Crazy?

Well, that's similar to what was done with the World War Two and Cold War debt.

The problem is, of course, that living in inflationary times is devastating to individuals, which is why it can't be, and never has been, done openly.

NatCons, however, may very well like this idea, if they can pull it off.  At the end of it the thesis would be that government spending would be brought under control, the national debt greatly reduced, and domestic production realty increased.  All of which would be for those who economically survived the ten to twenty year period it'd take to pull it off.

Which many would not.

And it might not work at all.  Indeed, it would only work if it was accompanied by high employment, which often high inflation operates against. That's why the increased domestic production would be necessary.

NatCons are a really different group and they've operated in this administration very much in the shadows, which doesn't mean they aren't operating.

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Giorgia Meloni is the leader of the National Conservatives now.


Trump's words toward the Holy Father are unacceptable. 

 Giorgia Meloni.

She is the one who is unacceptable, She doesn’t care if Iran gets nuclear weapons and blows up Italy in two minutes.

I’m shocked by her. I thought she was brave, but I was wrong

She is no longer the same person, and Italy will not be the same country;

Donald Trump 

As far as I know, nine nations hold nuclear weapons, yet only one has ever used them. That nation is the United States. Mr. Trump needs to de-escalate. Nobody throws around nuclear threats like Washington does, and he should mind his words.

Giorgia Meloni 

Whatever you think of them, or her, Giogia Meloni is the leader of the world's National Conservatives now.  Not Trump, who isn't one, nor Vance, who is but who is done for.  Orban, of course, is gone.

She was always the most presentable, and most thoughtful, of the lot at that.  

Trump has more than met his match here.  He can't begin to debate her.

Hungary’s New Leader Reveals Victor Orbán Was Paying CPAC. Péter Magyar called the payments a “crime” and said his government would stop the funds.

Hmmmm. . . this is interesting:

 Hungary’s New Leader Reveals Victor Orbán Was Paying CPAC

Péter Magyar called the payments a “crime” and said his government would stop the funds.

Saturday, April 11, 2026

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist, 124th Edition. On the Road with J. D. Vance. Avignon Papacy in the news. The Slovenian woman speaks. Men behaving badly towards women. Teens not having babies not a good thing? Staying too long.

J. D. Vance's Roadtrip.

This past week we've seen the United States meddle in a foreign election.

Now, this is likely happened before, but not in this fashion.  Chances are the CIA has funded various sides back during the Cold War.  If we could go so far as to topple the Iranian government, which we helped do in the late 40s as it was socialist (the horror!), we could certainly meddle in elections in some fashion.

But that's not what I refer to.

Rather, Vice President J.D. Vance, the highest legitimate figure in the U.S. Government, was in Hungary stumping for Viktor Orbán, the long serving Prime Minister of the country who looks like he's going to go down in defeat tomorrow.

Now, this probably provokes a yawn from a lot of Americans in a day and age in which we have a demented hotelier starting wars and saying stupid stuff non stop.  But it is really extraordinary.  The US has been willing to use economics and clandestine efforts in some circumstances, but outright campaigning?  

Nope.

Oh King Donny got involved in it too, with his limited world view:


In actuality the economy of Hungary under Orbán is in pretty bad shape.

What's going on here?

Frankly, a lot of the news analysis of this hasn't been very good.

Orbán represents something that Trump actually doesn't, although Trump probably doesn't realize that.  Orbán is not only an authoritarian from the far right, and corrupt, he's a illiberal democrat that National Conservatives adore.

Vance probably does get that, as he's a National Conservatives.

Unlike Trump and his Protestant Christian Nationalist, Orbán's party stands for a different sort of quasi authoritarianism.  Once that's still scary, but which is much more intellectual than anything Trump could grasp.  Trump's MAGA is massively crude in comparison.

Fans of Orbán imagine every Western democracy working the way that Hungary does, and its very notable that Hungary's primary opponent in this election is also from the far right.  This election is a contest between two National Conservatives with Péter Magyar, whose very last name means Hungarian basically, likely to come out on top.

Magyar formed a new party to run against Orbán's old party, which he came up in.  Tisza, the new party, has moved back towards Europe, however, and therefore is headed in the direction of being more of a true conservative party.

To put this in context, if this were an American election, it would basically be between Conservative Republicans and the Heritage Foundation, which is downright scary.

And that should tell you J. D. Vance's weltanschauung.

At least, however, that should tell you that if Vance is elected in 2028, which there's little chance he will be, Paula White and Franklin Graham will be sent packing.

Vance is now in Pakistan, having been assigned the task of negotiating the end of the war by King Donny.  Donny, who has no filter, has already noted that with J. D. at the helm, if it doesn't get done, well that's not Trump's fault.

Vance is a curious choice for this.  Either Trump really has faith in him, perhaps because he opposed the war, or he's just tossing him to the wolves.  Trump has no problem at all, as we've seen, axing those who were once his most loyal supporters.  This could really boost Vance in some ways, which may be what he's trying to do, or it could wreck him.

The Pope is Catholic.

In something that's vaguely sort of related to this, the news this week was filled in some quarters with the story that the Catholic Church may, or may not have, been threatened, or not, by the Trump administration.

The story was broken by a blogger that we link into on this site.  Supposedly some Administration officials were upset by some statements of Pope Leo's and told a Vatican official that the Church better get in line with Trump, and then reminded the figure of the Avignon Papacy.

Right away, some conservative Catholic bloggers were dubious about that, in part because we're all surprised that any American knowns anything about the Avignon Papacy.  What was additionally surprising, however, for historically minded American Catholics is to realize how many American Catholics don't realize that the U.S. is a deeply Protestant country with a strong history of rampant anti Catholicism.  Indeed, while Kennedy's betrayal of his faith got us all in the door of the culture, to our detriment, that's never really gone away.  Bishop Barron, when he appears with Trump's faith leaders, may be standing on a floor with members of other denominations, but you can be relatively assured that some of the Protestant clergy appearing with him don't think he, and the Orthodox cleric who appears, are even Christians, in spite of the fact that they represent the actual original Christianity.  

Anyhow, the Administration denied the story and now the Vatican has as well.  The overall lesson however, probably should be that figures like Vance and Marco Rubio aside, the Evangelical arm of MAGA is a lot stronger than the National Conservative end, and they don't really view Catholics favorably in spite of what naive Catholics may think.  Walking arm in arm with the Trump administration, which some have done, is going to come back to haunt American Catholics.

Pope Leo XIV, I'd note, is already getting accused of being a flaming liberal, including by some American Catholic clerics.  What he seems to be is, well, a flaming Catholic.  I.e., really, really, Catholic.  American Catholics who are upset with him ought to reconsider what's upsetting them.

Melania on the tube

Melania  Trump, the forth wife of King Donald, came on the tube to proclaim that she never served Epstein. She rarely speaks in public, and listening to her heavy accent really shows why.

People have said horrible things about her which she doesn't deserve, but it's easy in a way to see why.  Her husband is a horrible person with a horrible history with women and they were friends with Epstein.  This administration has sought to keep Epstein material from the public and to bury the topic, which is a big part of the reason that Pam Bondi was canned.

People have been wondering why Melania is choosing to speak now.  It is an interesting question.  It's also interesting that she demanded what her husband has been opposing, a real Congressional investigation.

I've often noted here that people inevitably revert to their original, and true, personalities.  We might just be seeing that.  She came up as a model and famously appeared in at least one photo that should be regarded as pornography. Modeling paid off as it turned into a career that caused her to be married to a rich man, if we regard being married to Donald Trump as a payoff.  Frankly, it probably isn't.  Maybe now she's returning to being the Slovenian woman that she originally likely was.

Men abusing women

Flag of the Hispanic people.  By Banderas - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=44866151

Fairly distressing news in some quarters.

An investigation by The New York Times found extensive evidence that the United Farm Workers co-founder groomed and sexually abused girls who worked in the movement.

I'll be frank that even though I sympathize with unions in the current age, while conceding that they also had a negative impact on labor in the 70s-90s, and while I sympathize with migrant farm workers, something about Chavez always left me a bit uneasy.  That might simply be because I first heard about him in the 70s, at which time I was a lot more conservative than I am now on a lot of things, as odd as that may seem.

But I don't think so.

Something just made me feel odd about him.

Which is a really easy thing to say retrospectively, isn't it?

Chavez was huge figure in the farm labor movement, which is to say the Hispanic farm labor movement as symbolized by his organization, the United Farm Workers.  The flag used by the UFW is also used by the Hispanic movement, which was strong in the 70s and 80s.


I tend to associate it in my mind with La Raza, which apparently no longer calls itself that.


Well, so what?

So what indeed.  I think in part that I just have a youthful recollection of how radical everything was getting in the 1970s, and associate LaRaza and UFW with that.  Things have certainly moved along since then, and indeed the entire American Hispanic Immigrant situation has.  Indeed, today the Hispanic population of the United States has really come into its own and is its own force in a way that it was not in the 1970s and 80s. And as that, as I long predicted, it's very conservative, but also sui generis.  Not MAGA, although Trump briefly thought it was.

What's that have to do with Chavez, probably not much.

One of the things about the farm labor movement and Hispanic movements in general is that they reflected back on things in Central and South America in away, including the efforts of the Catholic Church, of which of course I'm part, to aid Hispanic people.  Because Chavez was a practicing Catholic, he was lauded in some quarters by the Church, and not without reason.  Now his reputation is ruined, as it should be.

He seems to be one of those guys who just couldn't keep his hands off of girls.

Regarding somebody who couldn't keep his hands of of women, even it it meant drugging them:

Bill Cosby found guilty: What the $59.25M verdict means for sexual assault survivors

The whole Bill Cosby story is just bizarre.  It's hard to know what to make of it, other than it seems to be a massive example of the Jimmy Akin Rule that sin makes you stupid.  It's also, however, an example of accommodation to sin brings on worse sins.  Cosby was in Hugh Hefner's orbit.  In some ways, therefore, it figures.

Hefner was a pioneer in what one Leonid Radvinsky exploited in the electronic age, the prostitution of the image of women. He was a billionaire.

OnlyFans owner Leonid Radvinsky dies of cancer at 43

He's now take the same trip that Hefner took, and in both instances, even knowing that death was approaching, they did not reform.

Americans apparently spent $2.64B on Only Fans last year, which is a lot, but actually in context not as much as it might seem.  The girls whose lives are being wrecked by it didn't get much of that $2.64B from the men whose lives it is also wrecking.

And hence, once again, why the young are returning to real conservatism and the Faith.

I thought a drop in teen pregnancy was a good thing?


While a return to what is real and authentic is to be lauded, just like Paula White's bee dance, the groping for it brings about some really weird results.

The CDC announced last week that teen pregnancies were at an all time low.

When I was a kid and teenager society was hugely concerned about the teen birth rate.  It was actually lower in the 1970s and 80s than it had been in the 50s, but people didn't seem to take that into account and there was a general fear, it seemed, that 100% of teenage girls were going to be pregnant in any give year.

Well that figure is really in the basement now.  Added to that, there's lots of new stories that teenagers and young adults really aren't having much sex, which is also a good thing, assuming they aren't married.

Now, all of a sudden, some quarters of the far right are really freaked out about this.  Consider:

The problem is teens and young adults. From ages 15-19 the fertility rate is down 7% and it's down 70% over the last two decades, meaning we're telling people that are young not to have babies.

Dr. Marc Siegel, Fox News.

Problem?  What's going on here?

I'm not sure what they're aiming at, but it's interesting to note that the book "The Third Reich.  A New History" includes a Nazi era German cartoon lamenting the decline in German birth rates down to age 14.  It seems to be a far right populist thing.

Indeed, in some conservative quarters there's a real push to emphasize that young people need to get married, young, and have lots of babies.

I'm not saying that there isn't something to this, but it can really go to far.  This is going too far.

In the category of going too far.

I don't believe in recovered memories.

I do believe that you can basically forget something and then remember it later, usually when somebody or something prompts the memory.  While there are some very rare people with perfect recall, who can remember all the details of their lives with crystal clear accuracy, those people are few.  Most people, however, have piles of information stored in their mental databanks that they have no particular reason to recall, but can if there's a prompt.

Recovered memories of trauma are another thing, however, and in my view, mostly complete bullshit  People don't have some horrific memory of the time they were, fill in blank here, and have it capable of being restored.  People remember when they were exposed to really significant trauma. About hit only "recovered" memory of trauma that's likely real is when somebody didn't regard something as traumatic, but later on somebody convinced them that it was.  They never really forgot it however. They just didn't regard it as significant.

For this reason I'll note that this past week there's been news of a dramatic lawsuit being filed where the supposed victim of a trauma had it recovered after decades passing since it supposedly occurred.

Human memory is really peculiar.  We don't really know how memory works that well, but we do know that some people have highly accurate memories.  I fall into that camp.  I can remember certain things back to age 3 or so, and I remember them.  They don't vary or change, I can see them, in my minds eye, if I choose to, although I frankly will admit that I don't remember as much as I used to, and that concerns me greatly.

Other people have very malleable memories.  The details of what they think they remember change over time.  Some people recall nearly nothing at all and no prompting is going to recall their memories.

All of this is significant as in my view "recovered" memories are basically suggested.  They aren't real.

Having worked in lawsuits involving recovered memories this is pretty clear to me.  People will work with a subject until the subject has a memory.  The memory is completely fictional, but they have it.  

In the most recent instance of this, I happen to know one of the accused, or rather I should say I happened to have known the accused, although not personally and not well.  The accused is deceased.  I don't believe the accusations against him at all.  What I do believe, however, is that the person had a peculiar personality and had, as a sort of cause, a certain then demised demographic.  The demographic has become a cause celebre since then, which has caused the expressed public view to shift on the demographic, Frankly, that has completely suppressed any ability to look into the cause and origin of the condition, and up until a Supreme Court opinion last week, even caused states to basically ban looking into it.  What was once regarded as hopelessly weird and disgusting is to now be celebrated.  The person I knew backed the demographic when it was regarded as weird and disgusting, which is inevitably going to cause members of the general public to suppose that you are part of it, if they have any ability to do so.

Indeed, a lot of people still find the demographic weird and disgusting.  So it still comes up in that fashion in back room discussions.  That keeps some people who fairly reliably are rumored to be members of it to closet themselves.  Truth be known, as the condition is fairly openly accepted now, if the people who have it simply admitted it, probably nobody would care, save for one instance I can think of where a decade long public personality would have been shown to be a lie.

Accusing people of things is really easy.  Accusing the dead of things is easier yet.  American law, based on English common law, holds that the accused are assumed innocent until proven guilty, but that's not how the public acts.  If somebody is accused of certain things, people believe it instantly.  For that reason, those things are libelous per se if untrue, save for lawsuits, which are subject to an accusatory privilege.

Anyhow, I'm really tired of accusations that come decades after a supposed event.  It'll sound harsh, but there really ought to be a put up or shut up policy for adults.  Forty years later?  Too freakin' bad, you are too late.

Rampaging ageism

I posted earlier this week about Chris Christie taking a shot at the Baby Boomers.

Good for him.

I'm noting this as this past week, after that post, brought up too boomer related items.  One is the matter immediately above, brought by a boomer lawyer.  Another is dealing with an upset boomer.

The last instance of this was affirmatively an example of somebody upset because younger people are trying to move on.  I won't detail it, but I got a direct personal comment about it from the upset person.  They've been in a prolonged fight with a Gen Xer, who has gotten over the fight, and the Boomer now fears that people are moving on, and around, the Boomer.  The Boomer is correct.

Work, for most people, isn't a hobby.  For some elderly people it actually is, as pathetic as that is.  It doesn't matter if you have the sort of work that doesn't put you in the way of others, which very few people do.  People who work by themselves, for themselves, basically have that position.  Even then, if they work in an area of public trust, there comes a time when they need to stop.

John Barrasso, age 73.  King Donny, age 79.  Lindsey Graham, age 70.  None of these guys should be doing this job.

Last edition:

CliffsNotes of the Zeitgeist, 123rd Edition, The Holy Thursday Massacre