Lex Anteinternet: . . .as we were saying, on newspapers. . .

Tuesday, September 17, 2019

. . .as we were saying, on newspapers. . .

the local paper is now over $200.00 for twelve weeks.

I've always subscribed. My parents did before me. I'm still in the old school where I feel an obligation to get the local paper.

But over $200.00 for twelve weeks?

There is a point at which papers can price themselves out of the market. If I'm pondering dropping the paper there can't possible be a party left alive who is strongly devoted to getting it.

I'm really pondering dropping it. I feel an obligation to be locally informed, but right now most of the people I know, including highly educated professionals, no longer subscribe. And at that price, I might cease to.

No comments:

Lex Anteinternet?

This blog has been around since 2009. In the very first post, we asked the question: "What the heck is this blog about?"

Our answer to the question was: "The intent of this blog is to try to explore and learn a few things about the practice of law prior to the current era. That is, prior to the internet, prior to easy roads, and the like. How did it work, how regional was it, how did lawyers perceive their roles, and how were they perceived?"

We also noted: "Part of the reason for this, quite frankly, has something to do with minor research for a very slow moving book."

All of this is still true, but the focus of the blog has changed somewhat. It now focuses on the era from 1890 to 1920 in general, rather than on the law and lawyers specifically, although that may be far from obvious. It's also become the location where we comment on anything we feel moved to comment on.

We hope you'll feel moved to comment as well. While we moderate every comment, so as to weed out Spam, we greatly appreciate the comments where they are offered, and hope to see more.

Thank you for stopping in!