Sunday, April 3, 2022

Lamentations

From Twitter.  No other way to illustrate this.

Russian soldiers are murdered men in Bucha, Ukraine, as they left the city, or while they occupied it.

And while I cannot verify it, and therefore have not reported it to date, there have been accounts of rapes by Russian soldiers, seemingly a hallmark of the Russian Army since the latter stages of the Second World War.

To be fair, although it's frankly a bit different, Ukrainian civilians in at least one occupied city poisoned food and alcohol (that bane of Russian existence), killing some and making others sick.

This is all more than the horrors of war.

The Desolation of Jerusalem

How solitary sits the city,

once filled with people.

She who was great among the nations

is now like a widow.

Once a princess among the provinces,

now a toiling slave.

She weeps incessantly in the night,

her cheeks damp with tears.

She has no one to comfort her

from all her lovers;

Her friends have all betrayed her,

and become her enemies.

3Judah has gone into exile,

after oppression and harsh labor;

She dwells among the nations,

yet finds no rest:

All her pursuers overtake her

in the narrow straits.

The roads to Zion mourn,

empty of pilgrims to her feasts.

All her gateways are desolate,

her priests groan,

Her young women grieve;

her lot is bitter.

Her foes have come out on top,

her enemies are secure;

Because the LORD has afflicted her

for her many rebellions.

Her children have gone away,

captive before the foe.

From daughter Zion has gone

all her glory:

Her princes have become like rams

that find no pasture.

They have gone off exhausted

before their pursuers.

Jerusalem remembers

in days of wretched homelessness,

All the precious things she once had

in days gone by.

But when her people fell into the hands of the foe,

and she had no help,

Her foes looked on and laughed

at her collapse.

Jerusalem has sinned grievously,

therefore she has become a mockery;

Those who honored her now demean her,

for they saw her nakedness;

She herself groans out loud,

and turns away.

Her uncleanness is on her skirt;

she has no thought of her future.

Her downfall is astonishing,

with no one to comfort her.

“Look, O LORD, at my misery;

how the enemy triumphs!"

The foe stretched out his hands

to all her precious things;

She has seen the nations

enter her sanctuary,

Those you forbade to come

into your assembly.

All her people groan,

searching for bread;

They give their precious things for food,

to retain the breath of life.

“Look, O LORD, and pay attention

to how I have been demeaned!

Come, all who pass by the way,

pay attention and see:

Is there any pain like my pain,

which has been ruthlessly inflicted upon me,

With which the LORD has tormented me

on the day of his blazing wrath?

From on high he hurled fire down

into my very bones;

He spread out a net for my feet,

and turned me back.

He has left me desolate,

in misery all day long.

The yoke of my rebellions is bound together,

fastened by his hand.

His yoke is upon my neck;

he has made my strength fail.

The Lord has delivered me into the grip

of those I cannot resist.

All my valiant warriors

my Lord has cast away;

He proclaimed a feast against me

to crush my young men;

My Lord has trodden in the wine press

virgin daughter Judah.

For these things I weep—My eyes! My eyes!

They stream with tears!

How far from me is anyone to comfort,

anyone to restore my life.

My children are desolate;

the enemy has prevailed.”

Zion stretches out her hands,

with no one to comfort her;

The LORD has ordered against Jacob

his foes all around;

Jerusalem has become in their midst

a thing unclean.

“The LORD is in the right;

I had defied his command.

Listen, all you peoples,

and see my pain:

My young women and young men

have gone into captivity.

I cried out to my lovers,

but they failed me.

My priests and my elders

perished in the city;

How desperately they searched for food,

to save their lives!

Look, O LORD, at the anguish I suffer!

My stomach churns,

And my heart recoils within me:

How bitter I am!

Outside the sword bereaves—

indoors, there is death.

Hear how I am groaning;

there is no one to comfort me.

All my enemies hear of my misery and rejoice

over what you have done.

Bring on the day you proclaimed,

and let them become like me!

Let all their evil come before you

and deal with them

As you have so ruthlessly dealt with me

for all my rebellions.

My groans are many,

my heart is sick.”

The Lord’s Wrath and Zion’s Ruin

How the Lord in his wrath

has abhorred daughter Zion,

Casting down from heaven to earth

the glory of Israel,

Not remembering his footstool

on the day of his wrath!

The Lord has devoured without pity

all of Jacob’s dwellings;

In his fury he has razed

daughter Judah’s defenses,

Has brought to the ground in dishonor

a kingdom and its princes.

In blazing wrath, he cut down entirely

the horn of Israel;

He withdrew the support of his right hand

when the enemy approached;

He burned against Jacob like a blazing fire

that consumes everything in its path.

He bent his bow like an enemy;

the arrow in his right hand

Like a foe, he killed

all those held precious;

On the tent of daughter Zion

he poured out his wrath like fire.

The Lord has become the enemy,

he has devoured Israel:

Devoured all its strongholds,

destroyed its defenses,

Multiplied moaning and groaning

throughout daughter Judah.

He laid waste his booth like a garden,

destroyed his shrine;

The LORD has blotted out in Zion

feast day and sabbath,

Has scorned in fierce wrath

king and priest.

The Lord has rejected his altar,

spurned his sanctuary;

He has handed over to the enemy

the walls of its strongholds.

They shout in the house of the LORD

as on a feast day.

The LORD was bent on destroying

the wall of daughter Zion:

He stretched out the measuring line;

did not hesitate to devour,

Brought grief on rampart and wall

till both succumbed.

Her gates sank into the ground;

he smashed her bars to bits.

Her king and her princes are among the nations;

instruction is wanting,

Even her prophets do not obtain

any vision from the LORD.

The elders of daughter Zion

sit silently on the ground;

They cast dust on their heads

and dress in sackcloth;

The young women of Jerusalem

bow their heads to the ground.

My eyes are spent with tears,

my stomach churns;

My bile is poured out on the ground

at the brokenness of the daughter of my people,

As children and infants collapse

in the streets of the town.

They cry out to their mothers,

“Where is bread and wine?”

As they faint away like the wounded

in the streets of the city,

As their life is poured out

in their mothers’ arms.

To what can I compare you—to what can I liken you—

O daughter Jerusalem?

What example can I give in order to comfort you,

virgin daughter Zion?

For your breach is vast as the sea;

who could heal you?

Your prophets provided you visions

of whitewashed illusion;

They did not lay bare your guilt,

in order to restore your fortunes;

They saw for you only oracles

of empty deceit.

All who pass by on the road,

clap their hands at you;

They hiss and wag their heads

over daughter Jerusalem:

“Is this the city they used to call

perfect in beauty and joy of all the earth?”

They open their mouths against you,

all your enemies;

They hiss and gnash their teeth,

saying, “We have devoured her!

How we have waited for this day—

we have lived to see it!”

The LORD has done what he planned.

He has fulfilled the threat

Decreed from days of old,

destroying without pity!

He let the enemy gloat over you

and exalted the horn of your foes.

Cry out to the Lord from your heart,

wall of daughter Zion!

Let your tears flow like a torrent

day and night;

Give yourself no rest,

no relief for your eyes.

Rise up! Wail in the night,

at the start of every watch;

Pour out your heart like water

before the Lord;

Lift up your hands to him

for the lives of your children,

Who collapse from hunger

at the corner of every street.

“Look, O LORD, and pay attention:

to whom have you been so ruthless?

Must women eat their own offspring,

the very children they have borne?

Are priest and prophet to be slain

in the sanctuary of the Lord?l

They lie on the ground in the streets,

young and old alike;

Both my young women and young men

are cut down by the sword;

You killed them on the day of your wrath,

slaughtered without pity.

You summoned as to a feast day

terrors on every side;

On the day of the LORD’s wrath,

none survived or escaped.

Those I have borne and nurtured,

my enemy has utterly destroyed.”

The Voice of a Suffering Individual

I am one who has known affliction

under the rod of God’s anger,

One whom he has driven and forced to walk

in darkness, not in light;

Against me alone he turns his hand—

again and again all day long.

He has worn away my flesh and my skin,

he has broken my bones;

5He has besieged me all around

with poverty and hardship;

He has left me to dwell in dark places

like those long dead.

He has hemmed me in with no escape,

weighed me down with chains;

Even when I cry for help,

he stops my prayer;

He has hemmed in my ways with fitted stones,

and made my paths crooked.

He has been a bear lying in wait for me,

a lion in hiding!

He turned me aside and tore me apart,

leaving me ravaged.

He bent his bow, and set me up

as a target for his arrow.

He pierced my kidneys

with shafts from his quiver.

I have become a laughingstock to all my people,

their taunt all day long;

He has sated me with bitterness,

filled me with wormwood.

He has made me eat gravel,

trampled me into the dust;

My life is deprived of peace,

I have forgotten what happiness is;

My enduring hope, I said,

has perished before the LORD.

The thought of my wretched homelessness

is wormwood and poison;

Remembering it over and over,

my soul is downcast.

But this I will call to mind;

therefore I will hope:

The LORD’s acts of mercy are not exhausted,

his compassion is not spent;

They are renewed each morning—

great is your faithfulness!

The LORD is my portion, I tell myself,

therefore I will hope in him.

The LORD is good to those who trust in him,

to the one that seeks him;

It is good to hope in silence

for the LORD’s deliverance.

It is good for a person, when young,

to bear the yoke,

To sit alone and in silence,

when its weight lies heavy,

To put one’s mouth in the dust—

there may yet be hope—

To offer one’s cheek to be struck,

to be filled with disgrace.

For the Lord does not

reject forever;

Though he brings grief, he takes pity,

according to the abundance of his mercy;

He does not willingly afflict

or bring grief to human beings.

That someone tramples underfoot

all the prisoners in the land,

Or denies justice to anyone

in the very sight of the Most High,

Or subverts a person’s lawsuit—

does the Lord not see?

Who speaks so that it comes to pass,

unless the Lord commands it?

Is it not at the word of the Most High

that both good and bad take place?

What should the living complain about?

about their sins!

Let us search and examine our ways,

and return to the LORD!

Let us lift up our hearts as well as our hands

toward God in heaven!

We have rebelled and been obstinate;

you have not forgiven us.

You wrapped yourself in wrath and pursued us,

killing without pity;

You wrapped yourself in a cloud,

which no prayer could pierce.

You have made us filth and rubbish

among the peoples.

They have opened their mouths against us,

all our enemies;

Panic and the pit have been our lot,

desolation and destruction;

My eyes stream with tears over the destruction

of the daughter of my people.

My eyes will flow without ceasing,

without rest,

Until the LORD from heaven

looks down and sees.

I am tormented by the sight

of all the daughters of my city.

Without cause, my enemies snared me

as though I were a bird;

They tried to end my life in the pit,

pelting me with stones.

The waters flowed over my head:

and I said, “I am lost!”

I have called upon your name, O LORD,y

from the bottom of the pit;

You heard me call, “Do not let your ear be deaf

to my cry for help.”

You drew near on the day I called you;

you said, “Do not fear!”

5ou pleaded my case, Lord,

you redeemed my life.

You see, LORD, how I am wronged;

do me justice!

You see all their vindictiveness,

all their plots against me.

You hear their reproach, LORD,

all their plots against me,

The whispered murmurings of my adversaries,

against me all day long;

Look! Whether they sit or stand,

I am the butt of their taunt.

64Give them what they deserve, LORD,

according to their deeds;

Give them hardness of heart;

your curse be upon them;

Pursue them in wrath and destroy them

from under the LORD’s heaven!

Miseries of the Besieged City

How the gold has lost its luster,

the noble metal changed;

Jewels lie scattered

at the corner of every street.

And Zion’s precious children,

worth their weight in gold—

How they are treated like clay jugs,

the work of any potter!

Even jackals offer their breasts

to nurse their young;

But the daughter of my people is as cruel

as the ostrich* in the wilderness.

The tongue of the infant cleaves

to the roof of its mouth in thirst;

Children beg for bread,

but no one gives them a piece.

Those who feasted on delicacies

are abandoned in the streets;

Those who reclined on crimson

now embrace dung heaps.

The punishment of the daughter of my people

surpassed the penalty of Sodom,

Which was overthrown in an instant

with no hand laid on it.

Her princes were brighter than snow,

whiter than milk,

Their bodies more ruddy than coral,

their beauty like the sapphire.

8Now their appearance is blacker than soot,

they go unrecognized in the streets;

Their skin has shrunk on their bones,

and become dry as wood.

Better for those pierced by the sword

than for those pierced by hunger,

Better for those who bleed from wounds

than for those who lack food.

The hands of compassionate women

have boiled their own children!

They became their food

when the daughter of my people was shattered.

The LORD has exhausted his anger,

poured out his blazing wrath;

He has kindled a fire in Zion

that has consumed her foundations.

The kings of the earth did not believe,

nor any of the world’s inhabitants,

That foe or enemy could enter

the gates of Jerusalem.

13Except for the sins of her prophets

and the crimes of her priests,

Who poured out in her midst

the blood of the just.

They staggered blindly in the streets,

defiled with blood,

So that people could not touch

even their garments:

“Go away! Unclean!” they cried to them,

“Away, away, do not touch!”

If they went away and wandered,

it would be said among the nations,

“They can no longer live here!

The presence of the LORD was their portion,

but he no longer looks upon them.

The priests are shown no regard,

the elders, no mercy.

Even now our eyes are worn out,

searching in vain for help;

From our watchtower we have watched

for a nation* unable to save.

They dogged our every step,

we could not walk in our squares;

Our end drew near, our time was up;

yes, our end had come.

Our pursuers were swifter

than eagles in the sky,

In the mountains they were hot on our trail,

they ambushed us in the wilderness.

The LORD’s anointed—our very lifebreath!—

was caught in their snares,

He in whose shade we thought

to live among the nations. 

Rejoice and gloat, daughter Edom,

dwelling in the land of Uz

The cup will pass to you as well;

you shall become drunk and strip yourself naked!l

Your punishment is completed, daughter Zion,

the Lord will not prolong your exile;

The Lord will punish your iniquity, daughter Edom,

will lay bare your sins

The Community’s Lament to the Lord

Remember, LORD, what has happened to us,

pay attention, and see our disgrace:

2Our heritage is turned over to strangers,

our homes, to foreigners.

We have become orphans, without fathers;

our mothers are like widows.

We pay money to drink our own water,

our own wood comes at a price.

With a yoke on our necks, we are driven;

we are worn out, but allowed no rest.

We extended a hand to Egypt and Assyria,

to satisfy our need of bread.

Our ancestors, who sinned, are no more;

but now we bear their guilt.

Servants rule over us,

with no one to tear us from their hands.

We risk our lives just to get bread,

exposed to the desert heat;

Our skin heats up like an oven,

from the searing blasts of famine.

Women are raped in Zion,

young women in the cities of Judah;

Princes have been hanged by them,

elders shown no respect.

Young men carry millstones,

boys stagger under loads of wood;

The elders have abandoned the gate

the young men their music.

The joy of our hearts has ceased,

dancing has turned into mourning;

The crown has fallen from our head:

woe to us that we sinned!

Because of this our hearts grow sick,

at this our eyes grow dim:

Because of Mount Zion, lying desolate,

and the jackals roaming there!

But you, LORD, are enthroned forever;

your throne stands from age to age.

Why have you utterly forgotten us,

forsaken us for so long?

Bring us back to you, LORD, that we may return:

renew our days as of old.

For now you have indeed rejected us

and utterly turned your wrath against us.

 From the Book of Lamentations.*

Victor Davis Hanson, whose editorials became increasingly sketchy, in my view, in the Trump/Post Trump era, returned to a sense of stable on the other day and wrote an editorial on how to pursue helping the Ukrainians to victory.  One of the things he reminded us of is that we should not hate the Russians, and this is quite true.  It was not the Russian people who launched this war against their neighbor, it was Ukraine.

A less charitable op ed in the Tribune reminds us, however, of the Holodomor, in which the Soviets intentionally starved millions of Ukrainians in the early 1930s.

That was the Soviets of course, not really the Russians per se, but Putin is well on his way to trying to restore some sort of Imperial confederation based on central, if not communist, authority.  People don't forget things like that, and it becomes at some point hard to get over them.

Additionally, a feature of the Russian Army is that its conscripts are made up of a class who simply can't avoid service, and they're not the bright shining lights of Russian society.  Added to that, for inexplicable reasons, physical violence towards recruits has been a feature of Russian military life since the Imperial days.  Brutality towards junior enlisted men ends up producing solders who are brutal to civilians.

A good example of that would be the Imperial Japanese Army.  At the time of the Russo Japanese War it was noted that the Japanese were not brutal to prisoners of war and were willing to surrender if surrender was called for. All that had changed by the Second World War.  I don't know what changed inside the Japanese military itself, but the government had changed enormously to where effectively the military had a veto on the civilian administration of government by that time. And the Japanese were notoriously brutal towards their enlisted men and taught them barbarity.

The situation with the Russians today isn't really analogous, but it's becoming difficult not to recall that the Red Army was used to perpetuate a heinous crime against the Ukrainians in the 1930s and whatever else a person may say about it in World War Two, it's guilty of the the largest mass rape event in modern human history.

Now it's repeating that history.

It's well-known as well that upon their return home, what the troops of the Red Army had done outside of their own borders had become known at home.  It ended up causing the generation that fought the war to have a long-lasting set of problems at home.  Russian women, who are a powerful cultural force inside of Russia, regarded their husbands as having cheated on them or worse, and didn't forgive them.  Many Russian men didn't forgive themselves as time passed.

We note this as, once again, there's nothing in Russian culture that is responsible for this war. The best evidence is that Russians who know what is going on don't want it, although some are now rallying to their flag, as people in wartime do.

What it does tells us, however, that we need to do more for Ukraine.  Doing more for Ukraine, long term, is doing more for Russia, and the world itself, as well.

In the meantime, pray for Ukraine.

Footnotes:

*Lamentations 1

1   ¶ Як самітно сидить колись велелюдне це місто, немов удова воно стало! Могутнє посеред народів, княгиня посеред країн воно стало данницею!...

2   Гірко плаче по ночах вона, і сльози гарячі на щоках у неї... Нема потішителя в неї зо всіх, що кохали її, її зрадили всі її друзі, вони ворогами їй стали!

3   Юдея пішла на вигнання з біди та з роботи тяжкої, вона оселилася поміж поганами, спочинку собі не знайшла! Догнали її всі її переслідники серед тіснот...

4   Дороги сіонської доньки сумні, бо немає на свято прочан! Усі брами її попустіли, зідхає священство її, посумнілі дівчата її, а вона гірко їй!

5   Її грабівники взяли гору над нею, і добре ведеться її ворогам, бо їй завдав смутку Господь за численність у неї гріхів: Немовлята її до полону пішли перед ворогом...

6   І відійшла від сіонської доньки вся величність її... Її князі стали, немов олені ті, що паші собі не знаходять, і йдуть у безсиллі перед переслідником...

7   У дні лиха свого та страждання свого дочка єрусалимська спогадує всі свої скарби, що були від днів давніх, як народ її впав був у руку ворожу, і не було, хто б їй поміч подав... Вороги споглядали на неї, і сміялись з руїни її...

8   Дочка єрусалимська гріхом прогрішилась, тому то нечистою стала, усі, що її шанували, погорджують нею, наготу бо її вони бачили! І зідхає вона, й відвертається взад...

9   Нечистість її на подолках у неї. Вона не згадала свого кінця, та й упала предивно, і нікого нема, хто б потішив її... Побач, Господи, горе моє, бо звеличився ворог!

10  Гнобитель простяг свою руку на всі її скарби, і бачить вона, що в святиню її увіходять погани, про яких наказав Ти: Не ввійдуть вони в твої збори!

11  Увесь народ її стогне, шукаючи хліба, свої скарби коштовні за їжу дають, аби тільки душу свою проживити... Зглянься, Господи, і подивися, яка стала погорджена я!

12  ¶ Не вам кажучи, гляньте й побачте, усі, хто дорогою йде: чи є такий біль, як мій біль, що завданий мені, що Господь засмутив ним мене у день лютого гніву Свого?...

13  Із височини Він послав в мої кості огонь, і над ними він запанував! Розтяг сітку на ноги мої, повернув мене взад, учинив Він мене спустошілою, увесь день болящою...

14  Ярмо моїх прогріхів зв'язане міцно рукою Його, плетуться вони та приходять на шию мою! Він зробив, що спіткнулася сила моя, Господь передав мене в руки такого, що й звестись не можу...

15  Усіх моїх сильних Господь поскидав серед мене, мов на свято зібрання, Він скликав на мене, щоб моїх юнаків поторощити, як у чавилі, стоптав Господь дівчину, Юдину доньку...

16  За оцим плачу я, око моє, моє око слізьми запливає! бо далеко від мене втішитель, що душу мою оживив би; мої діти понехтувані, бо посилився ворог!

17  Сіонська дочка простягла свої руки, немає розрадника їй: Господь наказав проти Якова довкола нього його ворогам, донька єрусалимська нечистою стала між ними...

18  Справедливий Господь, а я слову Його неслухняна була... Послухайте но, всі народи, і побачте мій біль: дівчата мої та мої юнаки у неволю пішли!

19  Взивала до друзів своїх, та вони обманули мене! Священство моє й мої старші вмирають у місті, шукаючи їжі собі, щоб душу свою поживити...

20  Зглянься, Господи, тісно мені! Моє нутро бентежиться, перевертається серце моє у мені, бо була зовсім неслухняна... На вулиці меч осирочував, а в домі смерть...

21  Почули, що я ось стогну, й немає мені потішителя, вчули про лихо моє всі мої вороги, та й зраділи, що Ти це зробив... Спровадив Ти день, що його заповів, бодай сталося їм, як мені!

22  Бодай перед обличчя Твоє прийшло все їхнє лихо, і вчини їм, як Ти учинив ось мені за гріхи мої всі, бо численні стогнання мої, моє ж серце боляще...

Lamentations 2

1   ¶ Як захмарив Господь в Своїм гніві сіонську дочку! Він кинув із неба на землю пишноту Ізраїля, і не згадав у день гніву Свого про підніжка ногам Своїм,

2   понищив Господь, не помилував житла всі Яковові... Він позбурював у гніві Своїм у дочки Юди твердині, на землю звалив, збезчестив Він царство й князів усіх його...

3   В люті гніву відтяв увесь Ізраїлів ріг, правицю Свою відвернув Він від ворога, та й запалав проти Якова, мов той палючий огонь, що навколо жере!

4   Він нап'яв Свого лука, як ворог, противником стала правиця Його, і Він вибив усе, що для ока було пожадане, у скинії доньки сіонської вилив запеклість Свою, як огонь...

5   Господь став, як той ворог, понищив Ізраїля Він, всі палати його зруйнував, твердині його попустошив, і Юдиній доньці примножив зідхання та стогін!

6   Понищив горожу Свою, немов у садка, місце зборів Своїх попустошив, Господь учинив, що забули в Сіоні про свято й суботу, і відкинув царя та священика в лютості гніву Свого...

7   Покинув Господь Свого жертівника, допустив побезчестити святиню Свою, передав в руку ворога мури палаців її, вороги зашуміли в Господньому домі, немов би святкового дня!

8   Задумав Господь зруйнувати мур сіонської доньки, Він витягнув шнура, Своєї руки не вернув, щоб не нищити, сумними вчинив передмур'я та мур, вони разом ослабли...

9   Її брами запалися в землю, понищив Він та поламав її засуви... Її цар і князі її серед поганів... Немає навчання Закону, і пророки її не знаходять видіння від Господа...

10  ¶ Сидять на землі та мовчать старші доньки сіонської, порох посипали на свою голову, підперезались веретами, аж до землі свою голову єрусалимські дівчата схилили...

11  Повипливали від сліз мої очі, моє нутро клекоче, на землю печінка моя виливається через занепад дочки мого люду, коли немовля й сосунець умлівають голодні на площах міських.

12  Вони квилять своїм матерям: Де пожива й вино? І скулюються, як ранений, на площах міських, коли душі свої випускають на лоні своїх матерів...

13  Що засвідчу тобі, що вподоблю до тебе, о єрусалимськая дочко? Що вчиню тобі рівним, щоб тебе звеселити, о діво, о дочко сіонська? Бо велика, як море, руїна твоя, хто тебе полікує?

14  Пророки твої провіщали для тебе марноту й фальшиве, і не відкривали твого гріха, щоб долю твою відвернути, для тебе вбачали пророцтва марноти й вигнання...

15  Усі, що проходять дорогою, плещуть у долоні на тебе, і посвистують та головою своєю хитають над донькою Єрусалиму та кажуть: Хіба це те місто, що про нього казали: Корона пишноти, розрада всієї землі?

16  Усі вороги твої пащу на тебе роззявлюють, свищуть й зубами скрегочуть та кажуть: Ми пожерли її... Оце справді той день, що чекали його, знайшли ми і бачимо його!...

17  Учинив Господь те, що задумав, Він виповнив слово Своє, що його наказав від днів давніх: усе зруйнував, і милосердя не мав, і ворога втішив тобою, Він рога підійняв супротивних твоїх...

18  Їхнє серце до Господа крик підіймає, о муре, о дочко Сіону! Проливай, як потік, сльози вдень та вночі, не давай відпочинку собі, нехай не спочине зіниця твоя!

19  Уставай, голоси уночі на початку сторожі! Виливай своє серце, мов воду, навпроти обличчя Господнього! Підійми ти до Нього долоні свої за душу своїх немовлят, що від голоду мліють на розі всіх вулиць!...

20  Споглянь, Господи, і подивися, кому Ти зробив отаке? Чи конечним було, щоб жінки їли плід свій, своїх немовлят, яких виплекали? Щоб був у святині Господній забитий священик і пророк?

21  Лежать на землі на вулицях рядом юнак та старий... Попадали діви мої та мої парубки від меча, Ти побив їх в день гніву Свого, порізав, не мав милосердя...

22  Ти викликував, мов на день свята, жахоти мої із довкілля, і врятованого не було, і позостальця в день гніву Господнього, повигублював ворог мій тих, кого виплекала та зростила була...

Lamentations 3

1   ¶ Я той муж, який бачив біду від жезла Його гніву,

2   Він провадив мене й допровадив до темряви, а не до світла...

3   Лиш на мене все знову обертає руку Свою цілий день...

4   Він виснажив тіло моє й мою шкіру, мої кості сторощив,

5   обгородив Він мене, і мене оточив гіркотою та мукою,

6   у темноті мене посадив, мов померлих давно...

7   Обгородив Він мене і не вийду, тяжкими вчинив Він кайдани мої...

8   І коли я кричу й голошу, затикає Він вуха Свої на молитву мою...

9   Камінням обтесаним обгородив Він дороги мої, повикривлював стежки мої...

10  Він для мене ведмедем чатуючим став, немов лев той у сховищі!

11  Поплутав дороги мої та розшарпав мене, учинив Він мене опустошеним!

12  Натягнув Свого лука й поставив мене, наче ціль для стріли,

13  пустив стріли до нирок моїх з Свого сагайдака...

14  Для всього народу свого я став посміховиськом, глумливою піснею їхньою цілий день...

15  Наситив мене гіркотою, мене напоїв полином...

16  І стер мені зуби жорствою, до попелу кинув мене,

17  і душа моя спокій згубила, забув я добро...

18  І сказав я: Загублена сила моя, та моє сподівання на Господа...

19  Згадай про біду мою й муку мою, про полин та отруту,

20  душа моя згадує безперестанку про це, і гнеться в мені...

21  ¶ Оце я нагадую серцеві своєму, тому то я маю надію:

22  Це милість Господня, що ми не погинули, бо не покінчилось Його милосердя,

23  нове воно кожного ранку, велика бо вірність Твоя!

24  Господь це мій уділ, говорить душа моя, тому я надію на Нього складаю!

25  Господь добрий для тих, хто надію на Нього кладе, для душі, що шукає Його!

26  Добре, коли людина в мовчанні надію кладе на спасіння Господнє.

27  Добре для мужа, як носить ярмо в своїй молодості,

28  нехай він самітно сидить і мовчить, як поклав Він на нього його;

29  хай закриє він порохом уста свої, може є ще надія;

30  хай щоку тому підставляє, хто його б'є, своєю ганьбою насичується...

31  Бо Господь не навіки ж покине!

32  Бо хоч Він і засмутить кого, проте змилується за Своєю великою милістю,

33  бо не мучить Він з серця Свого, і не засмучує людських синів.

34  Щоб топтати під своїми ногами всіх в'язнів землі,

35  щоб перед обличчям Всевишнього право людини зігнути,

36  щоб гнобити людину у справі судовій його, оцього не має на оці Господь!

37  ¶ Хто то скаже і станеться це, як Господь того не наказав?

38  Хіба не виходить усе з уст Всевишнього, зле та добре?

39  Чого ж нарікає людина жива? Нехай скаржиться кожен на гріх свій.

40  Пошукаймо доріг своїх та дослідімо, і вернімось до Господа!

41  підіймімо своє серце та руки до Бога на небі!

42  ¶ Спроневірились ми й неслухняними стали, тому не пробачив Ти нам,

43  закрився Ти гнівом і гнав нас, убивав, не помилував,

44  закрив Себе хмарою, щоб до Тебе молитва моя не дійшла...

45  Сміттям та огидою нас Ти вчинив між народами,

46  наші всі вороги пороззявляли на нас свого рота,

47  страх та яма на нас поприходили, руїна й погибіль...

48  Моє око спливає потоками водними через нещастя дочки мого люду...

49  Виливається око моє безупинно, нема бо перерви,

50  аж поки не зглянеться та не побачить Господь із небес,

51  моє око вчиняє журбу для моєї душі через дочок усіх мого міста...

52  Ловлячи, ловлять мене, немов птаха, мої вороги безпричинно,

53  життя моє в яму замкнули вони, і каміннями кинули в мене...

54  Пливуть мені води на голову, я говорю: Вже погублений я!...

55  ¶ Кликав я, Господи, Ймення Твоє із найглибшої ями,

56  Ти чуєш мій голос, не заховуй же вуха Свого від зойку мого, від благання мого!

57  Ти близький того дня, коли кличу Тебе, Ти говориш: Не бійся!

58  За душу мою Ти змагався, о Господи, життя моє викупив Ти.

59  Ти бачиш, о Господи, кривду мою, розсуди ж Ти мій суд!

60  Усю їхню помсту Ти бачиш, всі задуми їхні на мене,

61  Ти чуєш, о Господи, їхні наруги, всі задуми їхні на мене,

62  мову повстанців на мене та їхнє буркотіння на мене ввесь день...

63  Побач їхнє сидіння та їхнє вставання, як завжди глумлива їхня пісня!

64  Заплати їм, о Господи, згідно з чином їхніх рук!

65  Подай їм темноту на серце, прокляття Твоє нехай буде на них!

66  Своїм гнівом жени їх, і вигуби їх з-під Господніх небес!

Lamentations 4

1   ¶ Як потемніло золото, як відмінилося щире те золото добре, як на розі всіх вулиць каміння святе порозкидане!

2   Коштовні сіонські сини, щирим золотом важені, як тепер ось за глиняний посуд полічені, за чин рук ганчарських!

3   Навіть шакали витягують перса, годують своїх молодят, а доня народу мого жорстока, мов струсі в пустині:

4   язик сосунця до його піднебіння від спраги прилип... Хліба жадають собі немовлята, й немає нікого, хто б їм відломив...

5   Ті, що їли присмаки, на вулицях з голоду мліють; ті, що виплекані на пурпурі, тепер смітники обіймають...

6   І більшою стала вина доньки люду мого за прогріх Содому, що був перевернений вмить, і не торкалися руки до нього...

7   Її можновладці чистіші від снігу були, біліші від молока, їхнє тіло червоне, мов перли, їхній вигляд сапфір,

8   а тепер їхній вигляд чорніший за сажу, не розпізнають їх на вулицях, їхня шкіра стягнулась на їхній кості, зробилась сухою, як дерево...

9   Забитим мечем стало ліпше, ніж повбиваним голодом, що гинуть проколені, за браком плодів польових...

10  Руки жінок милосердних варили своїх діточок, які стали поживою їм під час руйнування дочки мого люду...

11  Закінчив Господь лютість Свою, вилив жар Свого гніву, і запалив на Сіоні огонь, і пожер він основи його!

12  Не вірили земні царі та всі мешканці цілого світу, що ввійде противник та ворог до брам Єрусалиму...

13  ¶ Усе сталося це за провини пророків його, за неправду священства його, що кров праведників серед нього лили...

14  По вулицях бродять, немов ті сліпці, поплямовані кров'ю, так що люди не можуть діткнутись до одягу їхнього.

15  Уступіться, нечисті! кричали до них, уступіться, збочуйте, не доторкуйтеся!... І повтікали вони й мандрували, і казали між людьми: Мешкати в нас більш не будуть!

16  Господнє лице розпорошило їх, не дивиться більше на них, бо вони не звертали уваги на обличчя священиків, до старих вони ласки не мали...

17  Уже прогляділи ми очі свої, даремно чекавши на поміч собі, на варті своїй ми чекали народу, який нас не спас...

18  Чатують вони наші кроки, щоб ходити не могли ми по площах своїх. Кінець наш наблизився, сповнилися наші дні, бо прийшов нам кінець...

19  Гнобителі наші скоріші були за орлів піднебесних, вони уганялись за нами по горах, на нас чатували в пустині...

20  Попав в ями живущий наш дух, Господній помазанець, що ми говорили про нього: Ми будемо жити в тіні його серед народів.

21  ¶ Веселися та тішся, о дочко Едому, що сидиш в краю Уц, також над тобою перейде злий келіх, уп'єшся й оголишся й ти!

22  Скінчилася кара твоя, дочко Сіону, не буде Він більше тебе виганяти, та твоє беззаконня скарає Він, дочко Едому, відкриє провини твої!

Lamentations 5

1   ¶ Згадай, Господи, що з нами сталося, зглянься й побач нашу ганьбу,

2   наша спадщина дісталась чужим, доми наші чужинцям!

3   Поставали ми сиротами: нема батька, а матінки наші неначе ті вдови!...

4   Свою воду за срібло ми п'ємо, наші дрова за гроші одержуємо...

5   У потилицю нас поганяють, помучені ми, і спокою не маємо!

6   До Єгипту й Асирії руку витягуємо, щоб насититись хлібом!

7   Батьки наші грішили, але їх нема, а ми двигаємо їхні провини!

8   Раби запанували над нами, і немає нікого, хто б вирятував з їхньої руки...

9   Наражуючи свою душу на меч у пустині, достаємо свій хліб...

10  Шкіра наша, мов піч, попалилась з пекучого голоду...

11  Жінок на Сіоні безчестили, дівчат по Юдейських містах...

12  Князі їхньою рукою повішені, лиця старих не пошановані...

13  Юнаки носять камінь млиновий, а хлопці під ношею дров спотикаються...

14  Перестали сидіти старші в брамі, юнаки свою пісню співати,

15  втіха нашого серця спинилась, наш танець змінивсь на жалобу...

16  Спала корона у нас з голови, о горе, бо ми прогрішились,

17  ¶ тому наше серце боляще, тому наші очі потемніли,

18  через гору Сіон, що спустошена, бродять лисиці по ній...

19  Пробуваєш Ти, Господи, вічно, Твій престол з роду в рід:

20  Нащо ж нас забуваєш навік, покидаєш на довгі дні нас?

21  Приверни нас до Себе, о Господи, і вернемось ми, віднови наші дні, як давніше було!

22  Хіба Ти цілком нас відкинув, прогнівавсь занадто на нас?...


Friday, April 3, 1942. The end for Bataan.

The behind schedule Philippine offensive of the Japanese, the only one running behind schedule, makes use of reinforcements, including troops brought in from China, Japans strategic imperative, by launching a renewed offensive against Bataan.  It works, as after  massive bombardment, the Japanese break through the 41st Philippine Division.



Monday, April 3, 1922. Changing seats at the Butcher's Ball.

Setting the stage, in some ways, for what we're witnessing today in Ukraine, Vladimir Lenin designated Joseph Stalin, sort of, and maybe, as a successor, such that the latter became the new General Secretary of the Communist Party in Russia.

Cast of health play given by the Scabi Tuberculosis Home school, Hawaii.

Doris Day, born Doris Mary Anne Kappelhoff; was born in Cincinnati.  She achieved initial fame as a singer, and then went into acting from there.


The Jimi Hendrix Experience - All Along The Watchtower (Official Audio)

Saturday, April 2, 2022

Best Posts of the Week of March 27, 2022

The best posts of the week of March 27, 2022.

Sunday Morning Scene: March 25, 2022. On the Solemnity of the Annunciation of the Lord. An Act of Consecration To the Immaculate Heart of Mary. АКТ ПОСВЯЩЕНИЯ НЕПОРОЧНОМУ СЕРДЦУ МАРИИ. АКТ ПРИСВЯЧЕННЯ НЕПОРОЧНОМУ СЕРЦЮ МАРІЇ.








Painted Bricks: West of Surrender, Denver Colorado.

Painted Bricks: West of Surrender, Denver Colorado.:   

West of Surrender, Denver Colorado.

 


From a bar and grill, West of Surrender, in downtown Denver.

Cliffnotes of the Zeitgeist Part XXXI. The ⚥ Edition.

We just updated our ongoing thread on the television series, The Secrets of Playboy.  If you haven't read it, you ought to.  It's here:

Secrets of Playboy


 

Why the teenage waitress from a century ago on that thread?  Read it, and it'll become plain.

Anyhow, if you follow the show, you'll learn how Hugh Hefner was totally debased, and how those around him, if male, became debased, and those subject to him who were female, had their lives destroyed.  He treated women like toys and there's good reason to believe he didn't like women, really.  Not as human beings.

Playboy magazine was part of the Sexual Revolution, that culturally failed and destructive movement that we're still suffering from and living with.  Hefner's place in that was something like Goebbles place in the Nazi revolution, if we want to look at the Nazi movement in that fashion, in the Third Reich.  If you take his own claims seriously, which there is some reason to reduce, he had a place akin, perhaps, to Hitler in that movement, or Lenin in the Communist Revolution in Russia.

And yes, the comparison to those evil men is intentional.  He was an evil person, albeit one, who like those earlier evil people, attracted followers.

The record is far to clear to ignore.  The impact of the Sexual Revolution was wholly and entirely destructive, and women in particular, and society in general, have suffered enormously because of it, and they still do.

All of which relates, oddly enough to a series of things in the Zeitgeist in recent days.

Let's start with this headline:

Maren Morris is celebrating the way she shows off "country female sexuality" ahead of her next album release.

What Morris had in mind?  Probably not.

I didn't know until I saw the headline who Maren Morris is, and I still basically don't.  I don't like country music, which is generally bad music and often has not much to do with actual country things.  I learned, however, that Morris appeared topless (at least) in Playboy.

"Country female sexuality"?

Well, given what Playboy is, we could ask if she meant the Frontier brothel variant of female sexuality, as all her photos do is serve to have men check out and her naked boobs and imagine her in bed.

Her photos apparently appeared several years ago, so this revived controversy actually recalls the brothel analogy unfortunately well.  It's been in the news as she revived the story, posting, apparently, one of her topless photos on the net somewhere.

This doesn't advance the cause for women in any sense, and certainly not in the bold independent women fashion.  It's not a strike for, for example, female farmers, of which there are a lot.  No, rather, its a strike for the objectification of women, and through a vehicle associated with their destruction and violence perpetuated upon them.

It can be argued, of course, that that has something to do with "female sexuality", but not in a good way.

We've long held that every time one woman does something like this, it sets things back for all.

Shame.

And then there's a name that's been in the news:

Deporting Alina Kabaeva?

The flag of Switzerland, where Kabaeva resides with her children at least part of the year.

Who?

Alina Kabaeva is a former Uzbek gymnast and Olympian.  By all accounts, she was an excellent one.  She's also the mother of three children.

Well, so what?

There's a campaign going on to deport her from Switzerland to Russia, along with her children.

Why?

Well, it's consistently rumored that one Vladimir Putin is the father of the children of the 38-year-old Kabaeva, who is a resident, currently, of Switzerland, but who is a Russian citizen (although not an ethnic Russian) who has, in the past, gone back and forth.  Indeed, the rumors were so strong that at one time a Russian newspaper reported that they were engaged, which resulted in the newspaper being shut down.

Putin was married to Lyudmila from 1983 to 2014, but they divorced that year.  Not a lot, really, is actually known about Putin's private life.  The parentage of Kabaeva's children is routinely reported to be Putin, but if he is the father, it's certainly knot acknowledged publicly.

Well, again, so what.

Well, for one thing it brings up, maybe, the odd elements of power and hypocrisy.  Part of the reason that Putin claims to have invaded Ukraine has to do with the Orthodox Church.

Now, the largest of the Orthodox Churches is the Russian Orthodox Church.  But it's a fundamental element of every single branch of Christianity, Will Smith's apparent views aside, that extramarital sex is a mortal sin, no exceptions (are you listening to that Will?).  If Putin has, and maybe he hasn't, fathered three children with Kabaeva, he's acting oddly for a man whose has cited Orthodoxy even as recently as a couple of weeks ago.

Which assumes that he has been acting badly in this area, which maybe he hasn't been. Maybe he and Kabaeva, who was a Muslim but who has converted to Christianity, are actually married. We might very well not know, and we do know that while Orthodoxy frowns on divorce, it allows it under some circumstances.

Or maybe Putin is like some monarchs of old who felt that their positions of power gave them some sort of personal pass in this area.  Even Czar Nicholas II, who lived an exemplary married life, and who has been canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church, had a mistress when he was young.

Or maybe Putin is just as Orthodox as his position as a would be Czar requires him to be.  It is known that his mother was a devout Orthodox Christian.  Putin observes Russian Orthodox Holy Days, so maybe he is an observant member, although former advisor Sergei Pugacheve claims he is not.

At any rate, Kabaeva is a convert, and maybe she's straightened out. Should she be deported from Switzerland?

Well, at first blush that seems silly and cruel.  It's not as if she invaded Ukraine, and her children certainly didn't.

On the other hand, such is the fickle fate of courtesans, if that's what she is, or the spouses of monarchs, if we want to assume a marital union.  Marie Antoinette didn't retire to Paris, after all.

Choices do have implications.

Blows In Defense of Honor?


Speaking of spouses, and ones with a bit of an odd relationship to each other, the news this past week has been filled with the story of Will Smith striking a blow upon Chris Rock, in defense of the honor of his wife, Jada Pinkett Smith.

While everyone now knows the story, in spite of the low level of Oscar ceremony viewing, what occurred is this.  Rock, who has a sort of rough sense of humor, but who is funny, made fun of Mrs. Smith's baldness, which is due to a medical condition.  In this era of intentionally bald women, I don't know that female baldness is the big deal it once was, but it is a medical condition in her case and making fun of somebody's medical condition is rude, no doubt about it.

Having said that, the joke wasn't really all that aggressive, and related her condition to the movie G. I. Jane, which I havne't seen and I'm not going to.  FWIW, that movie featured Demi Moore as a woman going through Navy SEAL training, and she had a shaved head.

Anyhow, Smith laughed, but Mrs. Smith cringed.  Then, in reaction, Will Smith went up and violently struck Rock, who reeled from the blow.  Rock actually recovered his humor, at first, quickly, making a joke of it, but it then ended up in a yelling match between the two, with Rock on the defensive.

Frankly, Smith was lucky. The slap was in the nature of what is sometimes called a "sucker punch", in that it was unexpected.  Lots of men in other situations would have hit back, which Rock did not do, to his credit.

There was actually an ovation for Smith's violence at the time, although some were horrified immediately.  Denzel Washington took Smith aside.  Washington is the son of a Pentecostal minister, and is quite religious, warning Smith that at a person's height is when the Devil comes for them. Smith later, after winning an Oscar, gave a teary speech in which he apologized, but not to Rock (who has been silent on the matter), attributing his actions to having just appeared in The King about the father of the Williams tennis sisters.  Mr. Williams condemned the violence later.  At any rate, he went on about how he had been influenced by the role and felt God was calling him to protect those he loved at this stage in his life.

Well, to be blunt, he ought to get his own icky house in order in that case, assuming that he hasn't.  If he has, given his public declarations on the topic, he ought to clear that situation up.

Smith was raised in a Christian household, but he's actually attended therapy in order to overcome its influences so that marital infidelity, introduced by Jada Pickett Smith to some degree, and in an unapologetic fashion, can flow along in his marriage.  Neither of them has been faithful to the other, and it's an "open" marriage, and publicly so.  Smith felt guilty about that at first, which apparently didn't stop him, but with counselling he was able to overcome a central feature of being married and a central tenant of his Christian faith.

What that means in terms of his current faith, I don't know, but there isn't any monotheistic religion that looks up infidelity kindly.  Apostolic Christianity certainly holds it to be a mortal sin, and the tenants of any other Christian religion does as well, in so far as I know.  Even those few monotheistic religions that allow polygamy don't look on infidelity kindly, and the entire "open marriage" thing is an example of the modern disease of thinking every standard of the past doesn't really apply to us as we're so modern, even though they do, and our transgression in that regard have led to untold misery.

None of which means that you can't defend the honor of somebody who isn't really that honorable in general, but this application of The Old Law is really interesting.  It's the sort of thing that led to fisticuffs and even duels over the honor of women at some times.  An interesting revival of a standard that once was widespread, probably still is, but hasn't been publicly acknowledged for a while.

Of course, the thing about the Old Law is that it brings up the Old Standards.  The Old Standards travel together, not by themselves.

The Reappearance of the Old Order

Speaking of the men, women, and old standards, something interesting has been constantly reported on regarding the war in Ukraine, and with admiration by the press.

And what that is, is the that at the borders, most of the refugees are women and children, as "their men have returned to fight".

And nobody thinks that odd or unusual.

It's a roaring example of our Eleventh Rule of Human Behavior, and it's not the only one.

In the Russo Ukrainian tragedy, the Ukrainian men are fighting, and fighting heroically. Women are being heroic as well, taking their children where they can and fleeing, and suffering enormously. The tragic photograph of the pregnant woman being carried on a structure, whom we know lost her baby and died herself as the result of a Russian strike, will likely go down as the most famous photograph of the war.

The old order roaring back.

Now, some Ukrainian women are bearing arms.  The other day, a young woman (very young, probably a teen) was interviewed in a village where she was serving as a Ukrainian militiaman.  And she isn't the only example.  Be that as it may, however, this is a male fight for the most part.  Some women will fight in it, as wars involving partisan action have always included.

So far nobody has really remarked, however, how remarkable this really is, in our modern world where we pretend the distinction between men and women in relation to combat doesn't really exist.  Not only does it exist, it's very evident here.  Almost everyone in the Ukrainian service, regular and irregular, is male.  All the Russian troops are male.  Almost all of the Ukrainian volunteers are male.  Almost all (but not quite all, I saw a photo of an Italian female pilot the other day) of the foreign volunteers are male, probably well over 90%.

Indeed, that latter fact is telling.  NATO's public press likes to feature photographs of striking braided women in uniform (it's common enough that it can't be a repeated coincidence, and frankly its slightly weird).  Military press photos from the US military seem to omit the secret "look at the cute girl in the beret" feature that NATO photos do, and are genuinely simply more in the nature of a certain type of news photo, which is much more businesslike.

From NATO Twitter feed, typical US non cheesecake photo of a woman soldier, in this case of the Third Infantry Division.

But the concept in the West of women in combat is completely untested and the historical examples grossly exaggerated.  The most commonly cited one is the Soviet example from World War Two, which was actually much more constrained than those who cite it would like to admit.  Indeed, the Soviets apparently didn't regard it as hugely successful, as limited as it was, as after the war, they eliminated that role for their female citizens. The heir to the Red Army, the Russian Army, is pretty much a male deal, just like the Ukrainian Army. The same is true of the Israeli Army, in spite of the occasional citations to it.

Wars are a cultural test of massive proportions, and the old rules and orders tend to come roaring back during them. 

Struggling with the New and Biological Order

Pity poor Judge Blackburn, caught in a confirmation hearing and presented with questions that pit her between the spirit of the age as seen by those who are supporting her and the spirit of the age from those who oppose them, with biology in the middle.

BLACKBURN: I’d love to get your opinion on that, and you can submit that. Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg’s meaning of men and women as male and female?
JACKSON: Again, because I don’t know the case, I do not know how I’d interpret it. I’d need to read the whole thing.
BLACKBURN: Ok. And can you provide a definition for the word “woman”?
JACKSON: Can I provide a definition?
BLACKBURN: Mmhm.
JACKSON: No. I can’t.
BLACKBURN: You can’t?
JACKSON: Not in this context. I’m not a biologist.
BLACKBURN: So, you believe the meaning of the word “woman” is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?
JACKSON: Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there’s a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law and I decide.
BLACKBURN: The fact that you can’t give me a straight answer about something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are hearing about.

Okay, the way she's been quoted, we note, is unfair. She did not say that only a biologist could define what a woman is, but rather she stated, albeit you have to know the context, that the legal definition of a woman in the context of any one case had to be understood from the law of the case.  The way that American law is currently interpreted, her answer is quite correct.

But that raises a larger, indeed, an existential, question.

Earlier this week (at the time that I was posting this) there was something called the International Day of Transgender Visibility.  Anyone day in the year is now designated for something, and indeed typically a lot of somethings.  March 31 was also, for example, Anesthesia Tech Day, Cesar Chavez Day, Dance Marathon Day, Eiffel Tower Day, International Hug a Medievalist Day, National Bunsen Burner Day, National Clams on the Half Shell Day, National Crayon Day, National Farm Workers Day  National Prom Day, National She's Funny That Way, Tater Day,Transfer Day (U.S. Virgin Islands) and World Backup Day.  Some of these are obviously a lot more serious than others.  Transgender Visibility Day, however, got a shout out from the President, who issued a statement recognizing, in essence, their cause and taking a position on bills that have been in this area.

Wyoming was one of the states with such a bill, and like most such efforts in this conservative but not as conservative as people think state, it didn't go anywhere in our legislature.  Our bill concerned transgendered athletes, restricting sport participation to your biologically assigned gender.  Utah had a similar bill which passed, was vetoed by their Governor, and then overridden by their legislature following that so that it has become law.  South Dakota passed one which was signed into law by their right wing controversial governor, Kristi Noem.

Just after all of that occurred, the reason for the entire debate in athletics came into sharp focus as a genetically male swimmer who has undergone medial gender reassignment won a NCAA Division 1 swimming championship in the 500 yard freestyle event.

This does bring into focus the biological nature of the debate, and the peculiar nature of contemporary western liberalism.  The swimmer is genetically a man, and he's built, and frankly looks, like one.  He has a powerful male swimmers build, although if he was competing as a man, he would not have taken the title.  Competing as a woman, which he can only due to surgery and pharmaceuticals, he took the championship, thereby beating out the nearest genetically female swimmer.

In some very odd way, although nobody has noted it, this actually answers the question that the Billy Jean King v. Bobby Riggs match supposed was supposed to years ago.  Taking away the circus like nature of that tennis event, males will in fact beat women at sports every time for the most part, save for sports that women are uniquely biologically adapted to.  There will be exceptions, to be sure, but if sports were not separated by gender, women would be so rare in most sports as to fade to nonexistent, something nobody wants.

That's what not addressing this in some fashion, however, actually argues for.  The unfairness could be eliminated in sports overnight by just not having male and female sports.

Which would operate a larger, and massive, societal unfairness to women.

All of which begs the larger question, which is the one used as a "gotcha" on Judge Jackson.  That is, what is trangenderism.

Nobody really knows, no matter what people may wish to claim.

The basic nature of the problem is that it's based on individual perception.  That is, people who are "transgendered" have a strong feeling that they should be members of the opposite sex in spite of their DNA. That doesn't make them a member of the opposite sex, however, it only makes them desire to be.  They can't achieve that goal without surgery and ongoing pharmaceuticals.

But should surgery and pharmaceuticals be used to defeat our genes?  It's clear in the case of addressing a defect that few people would object.  I.e., if a person can correct something like bad eyesight, or a defective organ, and return to the established obvious baseline, that's one thing. But what about things that go beyond that and fundamentally alter us in some way.

This isn't the only example, but the curious thing about this that, so far, most of the things that fit into this category involve sex in some fashion.  Cosmetic surgery exists to repair all sorts of things, from birth defects to the impact of terrible injuries, but the thing that receives the most attention, and advertising, is expanding the size  of boobs. That's one such example, and it's purely cosmetic, but unquestionably related to one single thing, sex appeal.  Surgery and drugs to defeat natural sex assignment goes far beyond that.

But to what extent should a person do this, or be allowed to do this, on perception alone, and even if they are fully allowed, to what extent does the rest of society have to recognize the medical defeat of nature in this instance?  The following stories in this area don't provide much comfort for the individuals who embark on this path.

Topics Where You Least Expect Them

This entire debate came up  not only the Supreme Court nomination hearings, but also on Twitter in the form of a ban on the Babylon Bee.

For those who aren't familiar with the Babylon Bee, it's a satire site that originally was light Christian satire.  I.e., the authors of the Bee are Christians, but it poked fun at things that come up in Christian circles and debates.

Early on it was quite funny, but there's probably only so much satire you can really do in this area before it becomes truly offensive or just ceases being funny and, at least in my view, the latter is the case for the Bee.  And recently the Bee has crossed over from its original focus into outright satire, something that's actually quite an art to accomplish well (the best online satire entity in my view is The Beaverton, a Canadian focused website).

The Bee was banned on Twitter for its satirical post naming U.S. assistant secretary for health for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Levine as "Man of the Year".  It flew in the face of woke convention by referring to Levine, born in 1957 as Richard and gender reassigned in 2011, at which point changed names to Rachel, as "he".

The Bee's satire was really not very funny, which is perhpas because effective satire is difficult, or perhaps because it was genuinely an attack and was fairly mean spirited, no matter what your view is on this.  It ended up getting the Bee banned from Twitter, which hasn't caused it to back down one bit.  Indeed, they're seeking paying subscribers by noting that they've been attacked by liberals.   And on April 1, April Foods Day, it doubled down by issuing a false apology, which was also quite mean spirited.

Adding to a show on how this is all part of a raging culture war, political figures of the stoke the fires class immediately picked up on it, including such figures as Lauren Boebert, all of which raises a distressing question that was raised without reference to this in another forum, which we'll get to in a moment. 

Before we do, however, we'll note that a similiar, but much less pronounced, Twitter storm broke out on the left due to a statement by former Trump spokesman Kayleigh McEnany, who, of course, is now on Fox News, where they all seem to go. That follows here:

The anecdote (sic, antidote) to darkness is light. And the anecdote (sic, antidote) to a really grim future is filling the world with a lot of Christian babies.

This caused a mini tempest in Cybersphere, predictably, no doubt in part because it came up in such a truly odd venue and way.  But  this also taps into a bunch of stuff in the culture wars.

Right away, some organs on the left went on the extreme opposite. Salon, for example, ran an article that stated "Kayleigh McEnany wants more "Christian babies": It's an overt call-out to racist paranoia".  Salon goes on to claim that McEnany is espousing the "great replacement" theory.

That statement only makes sense, if it makes sense at all, from an American or at least an ethnic European prospective and a left wing one at that.  Indeed, the statement itself is paranoid.  Those familiar with the history of the Church would realize that while Christianity spread extraordinarily rapidly following the Resurrection, one of its claims to truth (it was amazingly fast), the first adherents were of course Jewish and the faith was (and the Apostolic Christians remain) amazingly color-blind, with one of the most important early saints, St. Augustine of Hippo, being a North African of at least half Berber descent (his mother, St. Monica, was a Berber).  In the United States, the "black church" remains one of the most culturally influential Christian denominations.   Therefore, "lots of Christian babies" doesn't mean a "lot of white babies" by any means.  Of course, to those at Salon, chances are that they view a Christian world view as somehow racist, as it isn't an Islamic or Buddhist, or whatever, worldview.  

The interesting thing about this overall, however, is how it shows a change in views over time and context, which is part of what this blog tracks.

Traditionally, large families were regarded as a blessing from God, with this view going back into antiquity.  Efforts to limit family size are in fact quite recently, having really come in during the early 20th Century. An interesting part of that, however, is that it was part of what was openly discussed as part of the "Battle of the Cradle" in cultural terms, with those discussing it not regarding themselves as racist.

This depended upon the person expressing the views, of course.  But in European and European American upper classes it was common to express concern that foreign overseas, non-European, cultures would pose a threat to Europeans due to their perceived high birth rate (which probably wasn't, in reality, much higher at the time, if higher at all, than the European one).  None other than Theodore Roosevelt, who was an advocate of Americanism, noted in correspondence that he "had done his duty" in this regard, by having several children.

Whatever a person thinks of that view, it's also the case that birth control of the Margaret Sanger type originally came in, as people like Sanger had noticed the dropping birth rates in the upper class and worried that higher birthrates among African Americans posed a societal threat.  Part, but not all, of her early birth control efforts were focused on the hope of dropping the African American birthrate based on that obviously very racist reason.

In the over century long time that's passed since then, the same demographic that Roosevelt and Sanger were part of have had their birth rates drop below the replacement level by a fairly substantial margin.  Whether McEnany was expressing a variant of that fear, I don't know, but I doubt it.

I don't know what branch of Christianity she hails from or is a member of.  Looking her up, she went to a Catholic high school, but that is not a reliable indicator of a person's religion really, as many non-Catholics attend those.  She always refers to herself as a "Christian", but not by denomination, which suggests that she's probably a Protestant, as Protestant's are more likely to self identify in that fashion. Catholics usually identify as Catholics, which is a common way members of a minority self identify.  I.e., the US is a Protestant country culturally which is obvious if you are a Catholic, and for that reason Catholics tend to identify themselves as Catholics.

Depending upon the answer to this, there would be different paths which a person might go to dive deeper into her opinion, assuming that needs to be done, or that the opinion has any additional depth to it. Given as we're not really doing that, but looking at other things, as we're inclined to do, we'll keep going down the road a bit. 

One way that people can interpret it is the way the Duggers have.  I.e., they're part of a "quiver full" movement.  I don't know a lot about that other than it emphasizes, apparently, having a lot of children.  The other way, however, is more of the traditional Apostolic Christian way, which really doesn't, even though some Apostolic Christians families do not.  It might be best expressed by the statements of Fr. Hugh Babour, who is a Catholic intellectual and who often has surprisingly nuanced views on topics that a person wouldn't expect.  On this topic, however, Fr. Barbour just always states that the purpose of marriage is to welcome children "and raise them up for the worship of God".

Anyhow, it's interesting how in a century or less we've gone as a culture to a point where the left wing of the culture assumes that making a statement that would have been simply regarded as an expression of faith, that most people probably held, and which the left itself held in a fashion, has gone to being one that's assumed to be racist and can only be stated on the right.

Slow Ride

Okay, onto something else.

Recently, a "trucker's convoy" was in the news, but only briefly.

Their timing was remarkably bad.

The entire concept, of course, came up due to the Canadian "Freedom Convoy" which had its origins in some truck drivers protesting being made to be tested and quarantined if they were unvaccinated and crossed from the US into Canada.  It ballooned into a general Canadian right wing protest over . . . well everything.  Ultimately, it got so bad in Ottawa that the Canadian government had to declare a state of emergency.

This all got a lot of press.

Then somebody got the idea of doing an American variant.

Well, no sooner had they started putting that together than the Biden Administration essentially gave upon mask requirements for most things and all sorts of states, including Democratically run ones did too. There really wasn't anything left to protest, but nonetheless the convoy got rolling.

And then Putin attacked Ukraine.

At that point, nobody was interested in this story anymore.  Indeed, it had become a complete anachronism, and at a point in time in the nation where there's a trucking shortage, and the price of fuel is going up, what the heck?

Well, in Washington D. C. a biker, who may have had enough, got his revenge.

A bicyclist, that is.  

He got in front of the convoy, and in spite of the trucks honking their horns and the like, he just peddled along at a crawl, and they had to crawl too.

A video of his actions was viewed 4,200,000,000,000 times.

Last Prior Edition:

Cliffnotes of the Zeitgeist Part XXX. The Russo Ukrainian War Edition.

Thursday April 2, 1942. The Hornet departs.

On this day in 1942, the USS Hornet left San Francisco Harbor with its load of 16 B-25s.

The Hornet, CV-8, in 1940.

Friday, April 1, 2022

Wednesday, April 1, 1942. Beginnings


Sixteen B-25s were loaded on the deck of the USS Hornet.

The Japanese attacked Prome in Burma.  

The Pacific War Council was formed. made up of representatives of the key allies in the fight in the Pacific against the Japanese.

Saturday, April 1, 1922. Changing Seasons.


The Saturday magazines were out, and Judge poked fun, a bit, at an eternal theme.

The Literary Digest anticipated Easter, with a young woman looking less than thrilled by the probable contents of a box containing an Easter Bonnet.


And in Washington, D. C. apparently there were long lines to license automobiles.


At one time scenes like this were common locally when everyone had to obtain new plates at the county courthouse.

The United Mine Workers went on strike.

The Provisional Government of Ireland took over governing 26 out of 32 Irish counties.  On the same day police officers in Belfast murdered five men and a seven-year-old boy in retaliation for a sniper killing of a policeman.


Sir Hugh Trenchard became the first British Air Chief Marshal.


Emperor Charles I of Austria, who had failed in an effort to regain his Hungarian crown, and then fell ill in early March, died at age 34.  His last words to his wife and nine year old son were "I love you so much".  His death took place in Portugal, where he was living in exile.

Blog Mirror: The Bureau of Land Management at Seventy-Five: Who Will Celebrate with Them?

 

The Bureau of Land Management at Seventy-Five: Who Will Celebrate with Them?

Thursday, March 31, 2022

Friday, March 31, 1922. Radio, Irish Treaties, Visiting the Department of the Navy.

H.G. Corcoran of Wash., D.C., who had connected his bed springs to his radio so that they could serve as an antenna, March 31, 1922

On this day in 1922 the first licensed radio station in Louisiana, WWL, went on the air.  It's still on the air, with a news, talk and sports format.

Secretary of the Navy Denby with Marines, and a giant baseball (softball?) like ball that apparently was mounted to a stand.

Secretary of the Navy Denby was visiting some of his Marines.
 
Chart at the Department of the Navy.

A photographer visited the Department of the Navy.

The Anglo-Irish Treaty passed the British Parliament and immediately received Royal Assent, making it the law.

The treaty, contrary to the way it is sometimes understood, did not reserve Ulster for the United Kingdom, but gave the Parliament of Northern Ireland one month to decide if it would join the Irish Free State. It did not.

Merchants of Anger

 A recent episode of Catholic Answers Focus was entitled, and started off with this subheading:

Fast from Being Furious.

Is it really true that if you’re not angry you’re not paying attention? Joe Heschmeyer, author of The Early Church Was the Catholic Church, explains why anger at modern problems is not always a virtue. Cy Kellett: Ever hear phrases like, “If you’re not angry, you’re not paying attention?” Joe Heschmeyer challenges those ideas next. 

It's well worth listening to.  Herschmeyer deals a bit with the psychology of being angry, and how it impacts us, and how it can keep us angry when we don't really need to be.

That taps into a couple of things, one of which is raised by this recent NPR Politics episode:

Why Did Tucker Carlson Echo Russian Bioweapons Propaganda On His Top-Rated Show?

Russia pushed a conspiracy theory that the United States is helping Ukraine develop biological weapons. There's no evidence for that, but the idea did end up on Tucker Carlson Tonight — a Fox News show that reaches, on average, more than 3.5 million viewers with each episode. How did the conspiracy theory find its way from the Kremlin to American conservative media?

And that also touches upon the daily outbursts by Candace Owens.

I don't watch Tucker Carlson (and indeed I was stunned when somebody I know well and respect recently quoted something he said in a discussion).  I don't watch Fox News, either.  For that matter, I don't watch any of the cable news programs regularly, even though I very much follow the news, and I've never watched Newsmax.  I've been watching the nightly news once again as I've been closely following the Russo Ukrainian War, although so far the television news on the war has been relatively superficial.

I read our local newspaper, follow a couple of local online newspapers, check out the headlines from other news outlets on the net each morning, maybe at noon, and maybe at the end of the day, and I listen to NPR Politics and all three of the network political shows that run on Sunday.

I'm not angry day in and day out, and I wouldn't want to be.

I have been baffled by how very intelligent people can end up in the anger trap.  Herschmeyer does a really good job of describing that, how psychologically it gives us some immediate gratification, and how it develops into tribalism, and can develop into paranoia.

It can also develop into a monetized following for those shoveling it out.  Tucker Carlson has waffled on what he thinks about what in Ukraine, as outrage at some of his positions built, but by and large, Carlson profits from making his followers mad at anyone who isn't a Trumpite.  If Carlson came out tomorrow with an episode that stated Trump did try to steal the election and the January 6 insurrection was just that, the angry followers he's built up would turn on him, and he'd be looking for new work.

This is even more the case for Owens.  Owens has a following for saying the outrageous, which in turn has built her a dual set of followers, one who love her and get angry at others over what she's told them, and a second that get angry at her.  For some, she's the one they love as she hates, and for others she's the one they love to hate.  Hate is what's going on, however.

And hate really isn't intelligent.

At the end of the Catholic Answers Focus episode, Herschmeyer and Kellett discuss a recent break room conversation they'd had, which was almost shocking in a way.  The discussion was which one of two personalities was "leading more people to Hell", one being a singer, and the other being some sort of public commentator . Herschmeyer dropped, perhaps inadvertently, that the public commentor may be a Priest.  Kellett had taken the position that the singer was, but Herschmeyer countered that many of the singer's followers were likely not in the faithful camp to start with, whereas many of the followers of the commentator had started off as good, faithful, people, before following the chain of conspiracy theories and hatred.

There's something to it.

There's also something to this.  If a person personally profits by keeping you angry, whether that's profit is monetary, or political, or in position, it may be that you truly aren't paying attention, at least to their motives, and very likely, other things as well.