Of course, they drew that last parade in an election year, which must have been a pain. I didn't watch but a few minutes of the parade, and that from an office window, but even at that I could tell it featured all the running politicians.
The reason the Lions are giving the parade up is a simple one. It takes about thirty people to do the parade, they reported. They're down to ten members. As the Tribune reported, in an interview of the club's leader;
We looked at our membership. It takes an awful lot of people to put that parade on. Most service clubs have declining membership and ours has declined to the point we didn’t feel we could do it adequately. We notified the fair board officially in January but they knew it was coming. On a regular basis, we have about 10 members and it takes at least 30 people to start that parade, so we’ve taken advantage of our children and our wives and husbands.Wow.
I've written about the decline in fraternal organizations before. The Lions aren't really that, however. Their a service organization. My prior posts probably somewhat confused the two and frankly most fraternal organizations have a service element to them. Probably in the modern context they darned near all do. But some organizations are expressly service organizations. The Lions are one of them.
The Lions were founded in 1916 in Chicago. It has 1.4 million members worldwide. So it's still around and still relatively big. But around here, it's not. And that's common.
The Rotary Club, which seems to be doing much better, will be taking over. Rotary International is a little older, having been formed in 1905. I've known quite a few people who have been Rotarians, but I've also known a few Lions. The Lions I've known have been frank over the years that they were worried about the local clubs (there were at least two, maybe there still are) future. At some point, I'd think, you'd tip over a scale where the weight would be really against you.
Which is a shame, but then I myself have never been in a service or fraternal organization and don't really have any interest in joining one either. But that's a feature of my character. I wouldn't have been in one if this was 1968, or 1918. It's just not me. I'm glad its been somebody, however.
No comments:
Post a Comment