Tuesday, October 3, 2023

No, he didn't.

A headline:

Pope Francis signals openness to Catholic Church blessing of same-sex unions. Marriage remains off table

He didn't say that. What he indicated is an openness to pastoral care that might include some blessings of people in irregular relationships, without going very far into it.

It is, we should note, a very bad idea in our opinion, by a Pope who is causing a lot of dissention and frankly, in our view, by this point, damage that will take quite some time to repair, and which will get worse. Part of the reason is his "on this hand, but on the other hand" speaking style.

We don't know as of yet where he is going, and if he is going in this direction, ultimately it will come undone, but not before a lot of damage is done, but . . . on this, we should consider. . . (Continued).

No comments:

Lex Anteinternet?

This blog has been around since 2009. In the very first post, we asked the question: "What the heck is this blog about?"

Our answer to the question was: "The intent of this blog is to try to explore and learn a few things about the practice of law prior to the current era. That is, prior to the internet, prior to easy roads, and the like. How did it work, how regional was it, how did lawyers perceive their roles, and how were they perceived?"

We also noted: "Part of the reason for this, quite frankly, has something to do with minor research for a very slow moving book."

All of this is still true, but the focus of the blog has changed somewhat. It now focuses on the era from 1890 to 1920 in general, rather than on the law and lawyers specifically, although that may be far from obvious. It's also become the location where we comment on anything we feel moved to comment on.

We hope you'll feel moved to comment as well. While we moderate every comment, so as to weed out Spam, we greatly appreciate the comments where they are offered, and hope to see more.

Thank you for stopping in!