Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Monday, September 10, 1945. Eh?

Post war news items were getting a bit weird.

Mike the Headless chicken was ineffectively beheaded, and would go on to become sort of a freak show star for a brief period of time.


Life magazine featured a black and white cover photo of a UAW worker.  The contents of the magazine were:

Pg… 29 The Week's Events: U. S. Occupies Japan

Pg… 42 The Week's Events: Editorial: Peace in Asia

Pg… 45 The Week's Events: King Leopold's Family

Pg… 51 The Week's Events: Black Markets Boom in Berlin

Pg… 127 The Week's Events: Lilly Dache Packs for Paris

Pg… 63 Articles: Nijinsky in Vienna, by William Walton

Pg… 112 Articles: As We May Think, by Vannevor Bush

Pg… 103 Photographic Essay: United Automobile Workers

Pg… 57 Modern Living: House for Texas

Pg… 90 Modern Living: The French Look

Pg… 61 Art: Portrait of Sylvia Sidney, by Fletcher Martin

Pg… 82 Art: Hudson River School of Painters

Pg… 75 Movies: "Uncle Harry"

Pg… 97 Sports: Grownups Spin Tops

Pg… 138 Science: Plant Cancer

Pg… 2 Other Departments: Letters to the Editors

Pg… 12 Other Departments: Speaking of Pictures: Germany's Fantastic Secret Weapons

Pg… 16 Other Departments: LIFE's Reports: "Bottoms Up" in China, by Lieut. Thomas P. Ronan

Pg… 132 Other Departments: LIFE Goes Swordfishing

Pg… 142 Other Departments: Miscellany: Seabees Give Waves a Party

Life is often remembered as a great magazine in its heyday, but it featured some pretty vapid articles.  This issue's feature on The French Look informed readers that young French women had small breasts and often went braless, depicting a typical bra (on a young French woman), for those occasions in which les mademoiselles wore them.  Doing that in the US, UK, or Germany would have been regarded as shockingly indecent, although it was not uncommon in the Southern European Slavic and Romance language speaking countries, which in turn contributed to the American and British views that the Italians were really primitive, and the German view that the Yugoslavians were.

In case you wonder, I ran across the Life magazine item searching this date on Twitter.  I haven't pulled up the article.

I'm clueless on the truth or accuracy of that claim and not going to investigate it, but French living conditions were definitely different than American ones, with a significantly different diet. Most people and cultures today are significantly thinner than Americans are and in the 1940s the French had suffered years of near starvation conditions, so they were likely overall less bulky than Americans in every manner.  A 20 year old French woman in 1945 had lived her teen years in starvation conditions and had been on pretty thing rations throughout the 1930s.  She would have been smaller in every way.

Also, French clothing had been severely rationed during the Second World War and you can't wear clothes you just don't have.  Americans have largely forgotten, indeed never appreciated, the extent to which World War Two causes massive food and material deficits during the Second World War.

Added to that, Americans for some reason think of the French as being Parisians, which most are not.  Paris had been the center of the fashion industry since at least the mid 19th Century, but that didn't apply to most of the French.  About 50% of the French were rural in 1940, down from 64% in 1920, but still a very large percentage.  As late as 1960 about 40% of the French were rural.

This oddly ties into this topic as rural life isn't like urban life, including in terms of the clothing people wear.  Starting in the late 19th Century French and British artists began to glamorize the agrarian life and left a fair number of romantic, but fairly realistic, paintings of it.  Some British paintings of rural life show farm women working fields in the hot summer months flat out topless, something you would not associate with either the UK or British farming today.  French paintings can be a shock to run across while as they're often very well done and beautiful, they also make it relatively apparent that French farm women in hot months were wearing light cotton blouses with nothing underneath them.

European agriculture was much slower to mechanize than American agriculture.  The Great Depression had an enormous retarding effect on the mechanization of American agriculture and this is even more so for European agriculture, which remained largely equine or bovine powered before the end of World War Two, another thing contributing to starvation as horses were conscripted for the German Army and cows and bulls just shot and ate them.  Here, however, this is significant as French men and women were working the fields largely in the same way as they had in 1918.


Brassiers are actually a French invention, makign their appearance in the 1880s, as we've discussed before, and they received a boost due to World War One, as we addressed here:


As noted, things don't change overnight.  So, maybe, young women coming of age in Paris in the 1940s who had an okay income or who had parents who did, might have a more advanced clothing standard then, say, a young woman growing up in rural Normandy, even if that young woman had moved into Paris during the war. 

And, shall we noted this, in 1914-1918 Americans had been absolutely charmed by the French, and American men had been charmed by French women.  But those men were largely rural and they were meeting women who were largely rural.  In 1918, 20% of American homes had full indoor plumbing, meaning most did not. By World War Two most Americans homes did, although quite a few very rural ones did not.  Most Americans were no longer rural by 1945.  

In 1940 only 5% of French homes had indoor plumbing.  The percentage for Italy was lower.

5%.  

Perhaps not too surprisingly, therefore, lots of American troops were fairly horrified by the French, contrary to the way we like to remember it, when they started landing on French soil in 1944.  The French, to put it mildly, smelled.  And if the French smelled, the Italians smelled worse, with Italian women wearing cotton dresses in hot weather in which their upper lady bits flopped out, combined with omitting shoes and going around in bare feet.  They were hopelessly primitive, in American eyes (which as noted is how the Germans found the Yugoslavians).

Anyhow, if you don't have indoor plumbing, you aren't going to be able to easily frequently wash your clothes and if you can omit something, you probably are going to.

Additionally, if you live in those conditions, and those of the 30s and early 40s, you are probably 40% underweight, smoke cigarettes constantly, have a large percentage of your caloric intake depending on alcohol, and you smell bad.

That's okay if everyone you associate with also is underweight and unwashed.

Things weren't like imagine them to be back then.  Glamorous French women? Sure, on their own terms in the conditions in which they found themselves.

Life today is now a sort of special issue magazine featuring photographs.  It's very large size format always existed, but it was originally a weekly and was so until 1972.  It's big competitor was Look, which ceased publication in 1971.  That both of these magazines took a hit in the early 1970s is really interesting is at long predates the Internet, which would otherwise be blamed for it.

Anyhow, Life was always a photo magazine, of which there were several others.  It was a serious one, but right from its onset in 1936 (interesting to note it came out during the Great Depression) it frequently featured cheesecake, running racy photographs of actresses and semi undressed women on the guise of discussing clothing or fashion.  Some of the photographs even today are shocking if you are not anticipating them.  In 1953 it went full pornography for the first time running a nude of Marilyn Monroe which would be the same photograph used as the very first Playboy centerfold in 1953.  The excuse, and probably the actual motivation, for that is that by doing that it was attempting to save the career of Monroe, who would be scandalized if her nude, taken in the late 1940s before she was a well known and up and coming actress, appeared first in a pornographic magazine, but still there's the only difference between the two publications of the image is the purpose the magazines served.

Anyhow, this is interesting in that Life and Look were general publication magazines that were outright flirting with cheesecake very early on, showing an (unfortunate) evolution on community standards.  We've looked at this in the past, but this is certainly good evidence that whatever was going on in the culture was going on before World War Two and before the 1950s.

The Allied Control Commission decided to transmit to all neutral states a request for the return to Germany of "all German officials and obnoxious Germans".

Sweden resumed allowing foreign warships to enter its territorial waters.

MacArthur ordered the dissolution of the Imperial general headquarters and imposed censorship on the press.

The Shangdang Campaign began in the Chinese Civil War between the Eighth Route Army and Kuomintang troops led by Yan Xishan in what is now Shanxi Province, China.

The Indonesian Navy was founded.

The USS Midway was Commissioned

José Feliciano was born in Lares, Puerto Rico.

Related threads:

Clothing: It was because of World War One.

Last edition:

Friday, September 7, 1945. Green River Railroad Bridge Fire. A final and unnoticed parade.

Lex Anteinternet: Monday, September 10, 1945. Eh? (Additional Labels)

Lex Anteinternet: Monday, September 10, 1945. Eh?: Post war news items were getting a bit weird. Mike the Headless chicken was ineffectively beheaded, and would go on to become sort of a frea...

This is why we can't have nice things: Hageman Pushes Forest Service Chief To End Clinton-Era Roadless Rule

 The roadless rule should not only be kept, it should be expanded.

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

The Epstein Files. What's in them that Trump wants to keep them hidden?*


It's absolutely clear that he does, and all the "well Biden didn't release" them doesn't change that fact. 

Something is in the Epstein material that he wants to never see the light of day.

What is it?

Did Epstein procure for Trump, and is Trump a hebephile or ephebophile?

That'd be a good reason for Trump to want to keep the materials hidden, and there's circumstantial evidence that Trump has some attraction to the shallow end of the pond.

One is simply his connection with Epstein, although that's clearly not enough.  It's very clear that Epstein traveled in rich and powerful circles as the rich and powerful do, and one of the things about that is that some rich and powerful people are creeps that the rich and powerful are nonetheless drawn to. Hugh Hefner provides a prime example.  In the heyday of Playboy, which fished near the legal limit itself, lots of people went to be parties at the Playboy Mansion, but not all of them were sexual degenerates.

Still, the counter evidence is provided by the same thing.  Some were sexual degenerates and weird creepy acts of sex happened there.  The place facilitated it.  Now we aren't surprised that James Brown and Bill Cosby were pretty creepy in part because they frequented the place.

Men like Epstein have a way of seeing who is willing to let their standards slip, blur the lines, and blur them some more.  We don't really know what happened with Prince Andrew and the teenage Virginia Giuffre, but it seems something did.  If something did, it's unlikely that it happened on the day of Epstein's and Andrew's first encounter.

Trump was a friend of Epstein for years. And now the Democrats have released the original (which apparently the earlier variant was not) of Trump's birthday greetings to Epstein.** The main difference between the two pornographic doodles is that the first one (I'm confused why there are two) was of an adult women with fully developed boobs. The second one is hard not to take as being of a very young girl with small boobs . . .shall we say a teen girl?

A doodle is is just that, but the conclusions here are hard not to draw, even if they're incorrect.  Most male doodles of naked women go for larger mammaries, as men like them.  Small ones. . .well that's odd. . . 

And Epstein isn't the only sexually questionable person that Trump has hung out with.  There was John Casablancas whom he bought the Miss Universe Pageant from who hosted parties featuring young cheesecake and whose last wife was 17 when they married.  He was 50.  No normal 50 year old is interested in a 17 year old for a bride.  Casablancas is accused of having had sex with girls in their mid teens, but he denied it during his lifetime, and those claims may not have been true.

There's also plenty of statements from accusers about Trump directly.  As we earlier noted.

Let's start with this. There may be more on the Trump/Epstein connection that I had known.  Ed Krassenstein reports on Twitter, with some comments by me, note the following:

Trump personally hosted a private party at Mar-a-Lago in 1992 attended only by himself, Jeffrey Epstein, and 28 young women, according to Trump associate George Houraney. (Which wouldn't necessarily mean that they were underaged).

Trump’s name appeared in Epstein’s black book with at least 14 phone numbers, per Vanity Fair.

He flew on Epstein’s plane at least seven times, and Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell flew on Trump’s jet in 2000—alongside a very young girl brought by Epstein. (But Trump was not on the plane at the time).

A 14-year-old girl, groomed by Maxwell, was introduced to Trump at Mar-a-Lago, per sworn testimony from an Epstein victim. (Which is super creepy, but doesn't mean that  Trump bedded her).

Another woman accused Trump of raping her at age 13 during an Epstein-hosted party, even claiming Epstein and Trump argued over “who would take her virginity.” She later dropped the suit after alleged threats. (But this might not be true, and isn't verified). 

In 2000, after Epstein was accused of propositioning another underage girl at Mar-a-Lago, Trump still told New York Magazine that Epstein was “a terrific guy.”

Trump publicly wished Ghislaine Maxwell “well” after her arrest for trafficking minors.

Epstein called Trump his “wingman” in a recording, saying they shared a taste for young women. (But that isn't Trump acknowledging the same).

Former model Stacey Williams says Trump groped her in 1993 during a meeting arranged by Epstein.

Trump and Epstein were frequently seen together in New York and Palm Beach throughout the 1990s and early 2000s.

And it doesn’t stop there—Trump surrounded himself with others deeply tied to Epstein:

Alan Dershowitz, Trump’s impeachment lawyer, was accused of sexual misconduct by Virginia Giuffre, who said Epstein forced her to have sex with him. Dershowitz also defended Epstein in court. (Dershowitz denies the rape).

Alexander Acosta, Trump’s Labor Secretary, was the prosecutor who gave Epstein his sweetheart deal in Florida—granting him and his co-conspirators immunity. Trump later rewarded him with a Cabinet post.

Steve Bannon, Trump’s former strategist, worked on efforts to rehabilitate Epstein’s public image after he was accused of trafficking minors.

Roger Stone, one of Trump’s closest advisors, defended Epstein publicly and downplayed the abuse allegations.

George Nader, connected to Trump’s 2016 campaign, was later convicted of possessing child pornography and linked to Epstein investigations. (That doesn't really mean anything in regard to Trump).

William Barr, Trump’s Attorney General, has no direct link to Epstein—but his father hired Epstein to teach at a private school despite Epstein having no degree, raising long-standing questions. (This also means nothing).

What's it all mean?  Perhaps nothing whatsoever. 

Does any of that prove he's a kiddy diddler?  No, but all of it is enough to raise real questions.

And then there's direct connections between Epstein and Trump, involving at least one young woman that are known to exist.  Virginian Giuffre's father was a maintenance manager Mar-a-Lago property and he got her a job there.  From there, she met Ghislaine Maxwell working as a spa attendant at Donald Trump's private Mar-a-Lago club while reading a book about massage therapy.  Maxwell recruited here, and apparently didn't worry about Trump learning what that recruitment meant or was willing to risk it.  Trump has claimed that his break with Epstein came as Epstein "stole employees".

And as with Trump's birthday wishes to Epstein, he clearly knew what Epstein's proclivities were.  He noted that they both liked the ladies and Epstein liked them on "the younger side".  A guy who makes sexual comments about his own daughter and a teenage Lindsay Lohan at least cast gazes in that directly.

Finally, it's hard for people not to pick the low hanging fruit.  Epstein got away with his conduct for years.  Trump was a pal.  "Oh Don, why not just take one. . . "

Conclusive proof?  Not at all.  Don has no real friends and Epstein may really have been just another rich and powerful associate.

What's the counter evidence on Trump?

Early on Trump was a big backer on releasing the Epstein files.  That'd be really weird for a guy who might fear he was in them.  His change of mind, therefore, would suggest that something else is operating in his failing brain.

None of the really public accusers has accused Trump of anything.  There are accusers, but they've stayed in the shadows for one reason or another.  Of course, right now, we really don't know who the vast majority of Epstein's clients were, but still, if Trump was one, making releasing the files a policy position in his campaign would be really bizarre.

And, frankly, people make stuff up, including women about rape and sexual misconduct.

If not Trump, then what?

The really remarkable item on all of this is the sudden change.  That strongly suggest that when this administration came in, it learned of a name or names that it really wants to keep secret.

Whoever that might be, it would have to be somebody that Trump really fears having named.  It might be rich and powerful donors to the GOP, or even just one rich and powerful donor.  Whomever that might be, the revealing of that name must be feared as something that would have direct impacts on Trump.

What sort of impacts?  Who knows?  Perhaps just monetarily. But perhaps the name or names is of somebody holding a big sack of beans of some sort that he's waiting to spill.

Rep. Thomas Massie, who is sponsoring a bill to release the files, keeps mentioning the CIA.  Massie knows more than regular member of the public, so that's interesting, if weird.  The CIA does actually dabble in all sorts of icky stuff, so that's not as odd as it might sound.  Compromising sources with honeypots is an old intelligence trick, so if they didn't look into Epstein and using him in some fashion, they were missing a bet.  

We haven't heard all that much about the CIA under Trump, it's worth noting.  Trump is messing with every governmental agency pretty much, but if he is with the CIA, its not really coming much to light.  Anyhow, if the CIA was involved with Epstein somehow, its frankly really hard to see Trump caring about not blowing their cover, especially in a way that's hurting him, unless blowing it is even more damaging to Trump, or if Trump is just afraid of the CIA.  Presidents have in fact been afraid of the CIA, and for all we know the CIA has a file marked "Trump in Moscow" that Trump fears being released.

Anyhow, the CIA thing seems far-fetched.  The rich and powerful make more sense, and beyond that, the rich and powerful reaching out to Trump is some fashion that's going to hurt him personally or politically if things go wrong seems the most likely thing going on here.  Trump may have been pals with Epstein, but that doesn't mean that he knew everyone that Epstein was passing out 14 year olds to.

Will the truth ever come to light?

An interesting thing about all of this is that this fight is going on over information which many wished to have released, which suggests that there is material to release.  If this all involves the CIA, it'd be hard to imagine the files even existing at this point, unless the CIA is keeping them to use.  Given t he corruption of the Trump regime. it's also hard to imagine Trump simply not ordering files destroyed.  All of that suggests that there are files, and that whomever has them keeps a close grip on them for their own reasons.  

That might not continue forever.

Footnotes:

*"I don't think my colleagues are happy about covering up for pedophiles...They're terrified of President Trump's political machine. His legislative affairs folks are reaching out from the White House to every Republican member of congress."

Rep. Thomas Massie.

**The birthday book contains entries from Bill Clinton, Jean Luc Brunel (rapist), Alan Dershowitz, Nick Leese (arms dealer who claimed not to know Epstein), Trump as well as others.  It's packed with sexual references, including multiple ones on young women.  It's pretty clear that those contributing were well aware of Epstein's sexual proclivities, and some of the entries make it pretty clear that some of those who contributed to the book had partaken of his services with what, effectively, were teenage sex slaves.

Related threads:

Cliffnotes of the Zeitgeist, 97th edition. The Epstein Connections.

Tuesday, September 9, 1975. Welcome Back Kotter.

Albania issued a decree requiring minorities to adopt names reflecting a Muslim origin, which of course they did not have.  It impacted Catholic and Orthodox minorities.

Welcome Back Kotter premiered.  Set in a gritty high school class in Brooklyn, it was one of the best television series of the 1970s.  It ran until 1979, and debuted John Travolta.

Last edition:

Monday, September 8, 1975. Leonard Matlovich on Time and the UFW.

Monday, September 8, 2025

Stop Acting Like This is Normal | The Ezra Klein Show

Monday at the Bar: The Death of an Honorable Profession

The Death of an Honorable Profession

The Supreme Court Is Backing Trump's Power Grab | The Ezra Klein Show

Monday, September 8, 1975. Leonard Matlovich on Time and the UFW.

Discharged Air Force Technical Sergeant Leonard Matlovich appeared on the cover of Time in his Air Force Class B uniform with the words "I Am a Homosexual", for which he was discharged, on the cover.  The decorated Vietnam Veteran had come out just before with his status and it seems he had not become a practicing homosexual until after the war.  He'd begin a protracted legal battle with the Air Force for reinstatement, which was offered to him originally with a promise that he discontinue homosexual activities, but he declined that.  At the time, an exception to the rule prohibting homosexuals in the military existed which would have allowed that.  Ultimately he'd accept a financial settlement.  The rule itself was removed.  It'd be somewhat revived in a different form in 1993 under the Clinton Administration's "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

Matlovich was raised Catholic but had converted to Mormonism.  He was subsequently excommunicated from the LDS for homosexuality.  He died in 1988 at age 44 of AIDS.  His actions made him a public figure in the homosexual rights movement, which was just beginning to become a thing at the time.  The DSM classified homosexuality as a mental illness until 1973 and was only removed that year due to a paper published by a homosexual psychologist.

I can recall the issue of Time and it was quite shocking at the time.

Matlovich is probably largely forgotten now.   The story is interesting in light of subsequent developments, mentioned in part above.  Homosexuality was not expressly prohibited by military law for most of the U.S. military's history, but then homosexuality itself was not used as a term defining what it currently does until the late 19th Century.  Servicemen were discharged for sodomy, without it expressly being in the military's legal code, as it was seen as a moral abomination, but not as a sort of character defining conduct.  This occurred as early as the American Revolution.1   It wasn't until 1921 when it became an expressed military crime.  It wasn't until World War Two however that the Service actively worked to bar homosexuals from the Service, making that policy one that had a much shorter period of being in existence than generally imagined.  Interestingly a two man panel of psychologists who worked on mental profiles for enlistment just before the war did not recommend excluding homosexuals.

The prohibition was lifted in 2011.

Part of the reason that all of this is interesting is that I'd predicted that the Trump Administration would restore the prohibition on women serving in combat, which was lifted in 2013 (I don't think it should have been).  So far, that has not been done, but the Administration has barred "transgendered" from serving.  That frankly makes a lot of sense as a "transgendered" person cannot carry on that status without pharmaceutical assistance, something that obviously doesn't pertain to homosexuals.  Anyhow, there doesn't appear to be any Trump administration move to restore the ban on homosxuals in the Service, which perhaps shows how far views have evolved on this matter.  The prior Service policies clearly reflected widely held societal views.

Farmworkers in California working for Bruce Church, Inc. voted to join the United Farm Workers, in the first such instance of that occurring.

Footnotes:

1.  It's been speculated on whether or not Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben, the Prussian officer who introduced Prussian drill and training methods in the Army during the Revolution may have been a homosexual, although it wouldn't have been understood in that fashion at the time.  There certainly seems to have been reason to suspect that and homosexual conduct was common in the Prussian and later Imperial German officer corps.  That's interesting in and of itself as it was common for officers to enter the service in their mid teens and serve in consistently all male environments, which would argue for a environmental origin to the orientation.

The same is true, it might be noted, for the pre World War Two British officer corps, which was additionally impacted by the odd British education system which tended to warehouse the male children of the well off in all male boarding schools.  At least a few well known British officers have been speculated about in this fashion.

In the U.S. military this environment didn't exist, and it's pretty difficult to find examples of well known servicemen who are suspected of having been homosexuals.  Unlike European armies, the U.S. Army did not discourage officers from marrying, although it was often financially impossible for junior enlisted men to do so.  Most U.S. officers in fact married at the usual ages, and long serving enlisted men often did as well.  Getting out of the service after a single three year enlistment was common for enlisted soldiers who wanted to marry.  Of course, like all armies, prostitution was rampant near U.S. Army posts, even on the frontier.

Related threads:

The Overly Long Thread. Gender Trends of the Past Century, Definitions, Society, Law, Culture and Their Odd Trends and Impacts.

Last edition:

Friday, September 5, 1975. Attempts.

Tuesday, September 8, 1925. Armor landed at Al Hoceima


The first amphibious landing of armor occured at Alhucemas Bay in Morocco.  This Spanish landing was successful.

The Rif War would soon end.

Press Conference, September 8, 1925

Washington D. C. building heights were discussed.

Last edition:

Monday, September 7, 1925. Failed landing at Al Hoceima.

Sunday, September 7, 2025

Have no concern for money. Love your wife more than you love your own life.

Have no concern for money.  Love your wife more than you love your own life.  Never be at odds, but be true.  Prefer her company at home above being out.  Esteem and admire her publicly, and advise her patiently.  Pray together, go to church, and discuss the readings and prayers.

If your marriage is like this, your perfection will rival the holiest of monks.

Saint John Chrysostom, ca 400 A.D

A little noted trend. The Bride of Christ.

While the news likes to report on the decline in membership in "organized faith", or whatever, the Catholic Church in the United States will grow this year, and not through births, but through conversions.

More people are entering it, than leaving it.

The Catholic Church also now has more adherent faithful in the United Kingdom than the Church of England.

Secular France, but the First Daughter of the Church yet, is seeing a Catholic revival.

Scandinavia, a bastion of Protestantism, and then of secularism, is seeing a Catholic revival.  Small in overall numbers, it isn't in terms of what it represents.

Something, clearly, is going on.

Friday, September 7, 1945. Green River Railroad Bridge Fire. A final and unnoticed parade.

Today In Wyoming's History: September 7:  1945 1945  Trains were halted west of Green River as a bridge was destroyed by a fire.  Attribution:  Wyoming State Historical Society.

Eh?  I thought you stopped posting items from 1945, now that the war is over.

I have, but as noted, when something interesting comes up, I'll still post it, and this item, while minor, is interesting. Trains were such a huge part of American, and Wyomingite, life in 1945, and this would have referred to a bridge on the UP line, which had been jam packed the entire war.  The disruption would have been significant.

The event didn't hit the local press, to the extent I can access it, that day.  News of an upcoming big parade in Tokyo did.


Truman was reported to be taking the Democrats to the left, which is where they pretty much already were save for Southern Democrats.  He nonetheless was appointing a Republican to the Supreme Court.

The Sheridan Press was not only reporting that new houses were going to be a lot more expensive post war, but that exciting new fabrics were on the way.


The Coronado washing machine was back after the war.


The Sheridan Press was also promising that you'd be able to buy airplanes at department stores.



In other news, the Berlin Victory Parade of 1945 was held, with the Soviets debuting the JS-3 tank to the public.


The parade itself drew sort of a "m'eh" response, as the world had already moved on to the post war and was tired of these displays.

The tank had been designed to take on German heavy armor and it was a monster, but it arrived too late to see action in the war.  It was the third in a series of tanks named "Joseph Stalin".  It would see some use in post war fights, particularly in the Middle East.

Australia ratified the United Nations Charter.

Last edition:

Monday, September 7, 1925. Failed landing at Al Hoceima.

It was Labor Day.


Nolan Motors, I'd note, was still in business into the 1990s.

The Spanish Army attempted to make an amphibious landing at Alhucemas Bay at Spanish Morocco.  It was a complete and disastrous failure.

General Maurizio Ferrante Gonzaga was appointed by Prime Minister Mussolini as the Commandant-General of the Fascist Party's Voluntary Militia for National Security (MSVN),  the "Blackshirts".

British troops fired on Chinese protesters at Shanghai.

Last edition:

Saturday, September 5, 1925. Picnic Etiquette