Ostensibly exploring the practice of law before the internet. Heck, before good highways for that matter.
Friday, May 27, 2011
Knowing, or not, what we think we know.
This thread fits in well with this blog, and is almost the theme of it. But, in general, how much do we really know of the routine of any one era? News tends to feature the rare, unusual, uncommon, or noteworthy, not the ordinary. But news in some ways tends to be what ends up being recorded as history.
The story of German horse use during World War Two is a good example. In popular histories, it tends to be reported that the German army of WWII was a mechanized, modern army. That's partially true, but to a much greater extent it was a hiking and horse using army. By war's end, it was the least mechanized army fighting in Europe.
Why is that not often noted? Well, the German propaganda machine would have had no interest in noting that, and every interest in emphasizing mechanization. Allied reports, for their part, would have emphasized the terrifying and dramatic. So, our view is not entirely accurate from the common sources.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Social and Cultural History and Film
Repeating the topic here, I was wondering anyone who happens to stop in here might think in terms of what movies are particularly accurate in depicting any one historical setting.
I'm not restricting this to military films at all, as I noted on SMH, but films in general. And I'm not restricting this to a film about anyone era. Just what films do we here think did a particularly good job in this context?
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Monday, April 4, 2011
Remembering what places were like
Because the city authorities stopped them from selling liquor and insisted that there must be no more piano thumping in their houses, the landladies of the bawdy houses of Casper held an indignation meeting one day last week and decided to suspend business entirely, and accordingly all the inmates of the three places on David street were discharged on the first of the month and Saturday morning fifteen of them left town on the east-bound train, it is hoped to return no more.“These people got the notion in their head that they could do just as they pleased so long as they remained in the restricted district, and high carnival was held nearly every night for awhile, and it was seldom that a big fight was not pulled off by some of them two or three times a week. They caused the authorities so much trouble that it kept one man on watch nearly every night to quell the disturbance. But after tolerating it until it could be tolerated no longer, the order was given out to cut out the booze and the music, and this made the madams mad and they have closed up their houses, and threaten to ‘kill the town.’ ...
“[I]f the places are ever opened up again, which they undoubtedly will be before the end of this week if they are permitted to do so, the people should, and no doubt will, insist that the places be conducted along lines that will not disturb the decent people of the town.”
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Food and diet

It's really easy to romanticize the past, including the kitchen table of the past, but a recent Freakanomics podcast I listened to suggests that some caution should be involved in that. That's no surprise really, but it is something that we rarely consider.
In our minds, the table of the past was always the place where home cooked meals were served, with fresh food of all kinds. But this really wasn't so. For one thing, refrigeration was not really terribly advanced until the 1930s or so. Prior to that, a lot of people had an "ice box". My father still referred to the refrigerator at the "ice box" in the 1970s, not really switching over to "refrigerator" until the 80s. An ice box isn't anywhere as efficient as a refrigerator.
People compensated for that by buying food every day, but that couldn't really take care of the entire problem. Fresh food simply isn't available every day, everywhere. Frozen food wasn't really fully available year around. Canned food was, in the 20th Century of course, but it wasn't always as good as the canned food we have now. Salted and pickled food made up for part of the problem.
And food variety was necessarily much more restricted. It isn't as if you could expect to buy oranges everywhere easily prior to relatively efficient transportation. Something like a Kiwi fruit would have been unheard of. Even when I was a kid fish came from the river or from a box in the freezer section of the grocery store. In the early 20th Century here fish would have been from the river, and that's about it.
Food related diseases, such as rickets and goiter, that are attributable to a simple dietary deficiencies. Vitamin D is now put in milk to address rickets, but when most people bought milk in glass bottles that was from a local creamery, this wasn't true. Iodine is now in salt, but it wasn't always.
In looking at images from the past, a full farm larder is easy to imagine. But that isn't always the way things were.
An interesting look at an aspect of this, in military terms, is on this Society of the Military Horse thread.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
The distance of things, and self segregation
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Saturday, February 26, 2011
The distance of things.
I was in Denver the past couple of days, and on my way out, I took some photographs for my blog on churches in the West.
In any event, these churches are all so close to each other, in modern terms, that I can't imagine all three being built now. All three are still in use. I was perplexed by it, until in considering it, I realized that they are really neighborhood churches, built for communities that were walking to Mass for the most part, save for the Cathedral, which no doubt served that function, but which also was the seat of the Archdiocese of Denver. Mother of God church no doubt served a Catholic community right in that neighborhood, and it likely still does. Holy Ghost served a downtown community, and probably also the Catholic business community that was downtown during the day.
This speaks volumes about how people got around prior to World War Two. It probably also says something about their concept of space.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Nice Post on what every American should learn about U.S. History
I'm often amazed by how little people know about the history of our nation. Nice to see somebody in the trenches considering it.
Monday, February 21, 2011
Heating
I don't know how the winter has been elsewhere, but here it's been a really cold winter. We've been down below OF repeatedly, including today.
Our house has electric heat. I actually like it quite a bit, but it's been having trouble keeping up in the really cold weather. Most houses around here have gas heat.
Most office buildings, if they're big ones like the one I work in, have a boiler. Ours has a boiler, but for some reason it's having trouble today.
This building was built in about 1917 or so. Not much insulation in it. When the heat isn't working, it's real darned cold in it.
For that matter, it was probably pretty cool in it back in the day during the winter, which is likely why men wore so much wool for office work in those days.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Office machinery and the written word.
Just recently, I resumed using the Dragon voice recognition system for dictation. For those not familiar with it, it's a program that jacks into your computer, and you speak into a microphonewhich then processes the spoken word immediately into print. This is the second time I've experimented with. The first time, I grew frustrated with it and, after the system collapsed, I abandoned using it and simply typed things out on my computer. I'm a pretty fast typist, so this was working well, but any way you look at it, it's slower than speaking. This time around, the Dragon system seems to be working very well, so I've very happy with my resumed use of it.
Anyhow, what a revolution in the process of generating pleadings and letters this is. When I first started practicing law, some 21 years ago, we were using Dictaphones. Now those are practically a thing of the past. For those not familiar with them, a Dictaphone is a specialized tape recorder that allows the speaker to dictate the document. This ended up, at that time, in an audiotape which was handed over to the secretary, who then listened to it and typed out the document. The secretary handed that back to you, and then you manually red lined it for changes. This process could take some time.
This, of course, was an improved process of dictation as compared to the original one, which entailed calling a secretary in to your office and dictating the document to her. She took it down in shorthand. My mother, who had worked as a secretary in the 40s, 50s and 60s, could take excellent shorthand as a result of this process. Now, shorthand is nearly as dead of written language as Sanskrit.
Even earlier than that, legal documents were processed through a scrivener, a person whose job was simply to write legibly. That person wasn't normally the lawyer.
I'm not sure if this entire process is really quicker than the older methods, but it is certainly different. My secretary only rarely sees a rough draft of anything. That rough draft goes on my computer, and I edit it from there. About 80% of the time, by the time I have a secretary proof read a document, it is actually ready to go. Those entering the secretarial field, for that matter, generally no longer know how to take shorthand or even how to work the Dictaphone machine. They're excellent, however, on working the word process features of a computer.

All this also means, fwiw, that the practice of law, at least, is a much more solitary profession than it once was, at least while in the office. Generating a pleading, in a prior era, was more of a community effort in a way. The lawyer heard the pleading for the first time, in many instances, as the same time his secretary did. Over time, most secretaries were trusted to make comments on the pleadings. In the case of letters, they were often simply expected to be able to write one upon being asked to do so, something that still occurs to some degree today. But for pleadings, today, a lawyer tends to wall himself off by himself while drafting them, and any outside input tends to start after a relatively complete document has been drafted. Of course, with computers, it's much easier to circulate drafts and to change documents as needed.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
What one building says about the march of history.
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
365 Days With A Model A.
The author notes that this is because he doesn't feel that everything should have a computerized element to it. I couldn't agree more.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Building trends and economic eras
That's certainly the case in this town. I've long known that the building I work in, the Con Roy building, was built in 1917 as part of a building boom associated with World War One oil production. But up until very recently I hadn't noticed how far that building trend must have carried. In putting up some photos for my blog on churches, it really became apparent to me. Most of the downtown churches here, fine old structures, were built right after World War One. I know that all those congregations had existing smaller churches, so they were replacing old ones with new much larger ones. Probably the size of the congregations had dramatically increased as well.
Same thing with some large old buildings here, except their earlier. Say 1900 to 1914. All associated with sheepmen, who must have been doing very well in a way that no rancher could today.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Railroad Roundhouse
Surgarmill
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
When horses were a major economic factor.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Tuesday, January 24, 1911. Boundary dispute.
The United States and Mexico, the latter of which was in a state of civil war, echanged ratifications of the Convention Between the United States and Mexico for the Arbitration of the Chamizal Case, which stated:
Convention Between the United States and Mexico for the Arbitration of the Chamizal Case
The United States of America and the United States of Mexico, desiring to terminate, in accordance with the various treaties and conventions now existing between the two countries, and in accordance with the principles of international law, the differences which have arisen between the two governments as to the international title to the Chamizal tract, upon which the members of the International Boundary Commission have failed to agree, and having determined to refer these differences to the said commission, established by the convention of 1889, which for this case only shall be enlarged as hereinafter provided, have resolved to conclude a convention for that purpose, and have appointed as their respective plenipotentiaries: The President of the United States of America, Philander C. Knox, Secretary of State of the United States of America; and The President of the United States of Mexico, Don Francisco Leon de la Barra, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of Mexico at Washington; Who, after having exhibited their respective full powers, and having found the same to be in good and due form, have agreed upon the following articles:
Article I
The Chamizal tract in dispute is located at El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, and is bounded westerly and southerly by the middle of the present channel of the Rio Grande, otherwise called Rio Bravo del Norte, easterly by the middle of the abandoned channel of 1901, and northerly by the middle of the channel of the river as surveyed by Emory and Salazar in 1852, and is substantially as shown on a map on a scale of 1-5,000, signed by General Anson Mills, commissioner on the part of the United States, and Senior Don F. Javier Osorno, commissioner on the part of Mexico, which accompanies the report of the International Boundary Commission, in Case No. 13, entitled "Alleged Obstruction in the Mexican End of the El Paso Street Railway Bridge and Backwaters Caused by the Great Bend in the River Below," and on file in the archives of the two governments.
Article II
The difference as to the international title of the Chamizal tract shall be again referred to the International Boundary Commission, which shall be enlarged by the addition, for the purposes of the consideration and decision of the aforesaid difference only, of a third commissioner, who shalt preside over the deliberations of the commission. This commissioner shall be a Canadian jurist and shall be selected by the two governments by common accord, or, failing such agreement, by the Government of Canada, which shall be requested to designate him. No decision of the commission shall be perfectly valid unless the commission shall have been fully constituted by the three members who compose it.
Article III
The commission shall decide solely and exclusively as to whether the international title to the Chamizal tract is in the United States of America or Mexico. The decision of the commission, whether rendered unanimously or by majority vote of the commissioners, shall be final and conclusive upon both governments, and without appeal. The decision shall be in writing and shall state the reasons upon which it is based. It shall be rendered within thirty days after the close of the hearings.
Article IV
Each government shall be entitled to be represented before the commission by an agent and such counsel as it may deem necessary to designate; the agent and counsel shall be entitled to make oral argument and to examine and cross-examine witnesses and, provided that the commission so decides, to introduce further documentary evidence.
Article V
On or before December 1, 1910, each government shall present to the agent of the other party two or more printed copies of its case, together with the documentary evidence upon which it relies. It shall be sufficient for this purpose if each government delivers the copies and documents aforesaid at the Mexican Embassy at Washington or at the American Embassy at the City of Mexico, as the case may be, for transmission. As soon thereafter as possible, and within ten days, each party shall deliver two printed copies of its case and accompanying documentary evidence to each member of the commission. Delivery to the American and Mexican commissioners may be made at their offices in El Paso,Texas; the copies intended for the Canadian commissioner may be delivered at the British Embassy at Washington or at the British Legation at the City of Mexico.
On or before February 1, 1911, each government may present to the agent of the other a counter case, with documentary evidence, in answer to the case and documentary evidence of the other party. The countercase shall be delivered in the manner provided in the foregoing paragraph.
The commission shall hold its first session in the city of El Paso, State of Texas, where the offices of the International Boundary Commission are situated, on March 1, 1911, and shall proceed to the trial of the case with all convenient speed, sitting either at El Paso, Texas, or Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, as convenience may require. The commission shall act in accordance with the procedure established in the boundary convention of 1889. It shall, however, be empowered to adopt such rules and regulations as it may deem convenient in the course of the case.
At the first meeting of the three commissioners each party shall deliver to each of the commissioners and to the agent of the other party, in duplicate, with such additional copies as may be required, a printed argument showing the points relied upon in the case and counter-case, and referring to the documentary evidence upon which it is based. Each party shall have the right to file such supplemental printed brief as it may deem requisite. Such briefs shall be filed within ten days after the close of the hearings, unless further time be granted by the commission.
Article VI
Each government shall pay the expenses of the presentation and conduct of its case before the commission; all other expenses which by their nature are a charge on both governments, including the honorarium for the Canadian commissioner, shall be borne by the two governments in equal moieties.
Article VII
In case of the temporary or permanent unavoidable absence of any one of the commissioners, his place will be filled by the government concerned, except in the case of the Canadian jurist. The latter under any like circumstances shall be replaced in accordance with the provisions of this convention.
Article VIII
If the arbitral award provided for by this convention shall be favorable to Mexico, it shall be executed within the term of two years, which can not be extended, and which shall be counted from the date on which the award is rendered. During that time the status quo shall be maintained in the Chamizal tract on the terms agreed upon by both governments.
Article IX
By this convention the contracting parties declare to be null and void all previous propositions that have reciprocally been made for the diplomatic settlement of the Chamizal case; but each party shall be entitled to put in evidence by way of information such of this official correspondence as it deems advisable.
Article X
The present convention shall be ratified in accordance with the constitutional forms of the contracting parties and shall take effect from the date of the exchange of its ratifications.
The ratifications shall be exchanged at Washington as soon as possible.
In witness whereof, the respective plenipotentiaries have signed the above articles, both in the English and Spanish languages, and have hereunto affixed their seals.
Done in duplicate at the City of Washington, this 24th day of June, one thousand nine hundred and ten.
PHILANDER C. KNOX
F. L. DE LA BARRA
It was a small boundary dispute.
On the same day, the Army deployed cavalry to preserve the neutrality of the Rio Grande because of the Mexican Revolution.
Ten people were hung for being in a conspiracy to assassinate Hirohito, the Crown Prince of Japan. Included amongst them was Kanno Sugako (管野 須賀子), also known as Kanno Suga (管野 スガ), a Japanese anarcha-feminist journalist.
Last edition:
Saturday, January 21, 1911. The National Progressive Republican League organized.
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Some things don't change that much.
Friday, January 21, 2011
Saturday, January 21, 1911. The National Progressive Republican League organized.
Back when the Republican Party wasn't mostly run by castratis, the National Progressive Republican League was organized by a group of Republican Party members who were dissatisfied with the U.S. President William Howard Taft, who was liberal centrist, as opposed to the current GOP, which is fascist (even right down to state capitalism and ultra nationalism).
The Territory of New Mexico adopted a proposed state constitution.
Last edition:
Thursday, January 19, 1911. Park County organized.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Thursday, January 19, 1911. Park County organized.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Wednesday, January 18, 1911. First landing on a ship.
Eugene Burton Ely landed a Curtiss biplane on the deck of the USS Pennsylvania.
Friday, January 14, 2011
Saturday, January 14, 1911. Bay of Whales.
Wednesday, January 11, 1911 Mrs. Geo. R. Peabody and "Mauchi".
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Wednesday, January 11, 1911 Mrs. Geo. R. Peabody and "Mauchi".
Friday, January 7, 2011
Saturday, January 7, 1911. The first downhill skiing race took place at Crans-Montana, Switzerland.
The first downhill skiing race took place at Crans-Montana, Switzerland.
Last edition:
Monday, January 2, 1911. "Ahí te van las hojas, mándame más tamales"
Sunday, January 2, 2011
Monday, January 2, 1911. "Ahí te van las hojas, mándame más tamales"
Troops under the command of Maderoista Pascual Orozco, Jr. ambushed Federal troops at Cañon de Mal Paso. After the battle, Orozco ordered his men to gather up all the caps and clothing of the dead Federals and sent them to Porfirio Díaz with the taunt, "Ahí te van las hojas, mándame más tamales" ("Here are the wrappers, send me more tamales.")
Joseph M. Carey took office as Governor of Wyoming.
Last edition:
Sunday, January 1, 1911
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Sunday, January 1, 1911
Friday, December 31, 2010
Saturday, December 31, 1910. New Years Eve.
The first year of the decade of the 10s came to an end.
New Years is big with sporting events, and was even in 1910.
December 31, 1910: Georges Vezina made his debut with the Montreal Canadiens.
The first year of the 1910s showed the hints, as indeed had all of the 1900s, of what was soon to be a great bloodletting, but the world was not there yet. What was there, however, was the Mexican Revolution, which had broken out and in which fighting was now pitched, even though the war had just begun.
Last edition:
Friday, December 30, 1910. "Race Suicide".
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Friday, December 30, 1910. "Race Suicide".
Cornell University Professor Walter F. Willcox delivered his address, "The Change in the Proportion of Children in the United States and the Birth-Rate in France During the Nineteenth Century", to a meeting of the American Statistical Association in St. Louis. In it, he posed as hyperbole that statistically if the trend continued, births would cease by 2015.
The paper variant:
This was taken for what it was, a statistical example, by listeners, but Theodore Roosevelt used the talk to boost his talking points on "race suicide", which essentially held that the WASP class was dooming itself to extinction due to its lower birth rate.. The concept, long held in repute, has revived during the Second Trump Administration, probably making this one of the very few points that MAGA and Theodore Roosevelt agree upon. It's the basis, to some degree of the Pronatalist movement, which likewise holds that European American women are not having enough children.
Anglican minister and astronomer T.H.E.C. Espin became the first human to see the birth of the new star.
Rancher Luis Moya declared for Madero and began to assemble an armed force.
The New York Times reported that Federal troops had defeated Maderistas in battle the day prior.
Last edition:







