Tuesday, February 9, 2021

The 2021 Wyoming Legislature, Part 1


Already?

Yes!  Legislative committees are already considering bills and some are being advanced for the legislature.  As we do every year, we'll take a look at those here.

September 21, 2020

And here's the first entry:

A committee of the Wyoming legislature has passed a bill advancing a Road Use Charge.  The RUC would track a vehicle's highway miles by use of a GPS and then bill the user.  There's obviously a lot of technology that I don't grasp on this one, not the least of which is that I don't have a single vehicle equipped with a GPS so I don't know how that would really work.

While this bill did get past committee, my prediction is that it might not actually make it to the legislature and that it won't make it to the floor. It'll prove to be unpopular with Wyomingites, at least right now, who will find the thought of being tracked by GPS offensive.

On that, I'm not sure how it actually intends to track a vehicle.  It's interesting in that there's a certain assumption that everyone drives a relatively modern vehicle, which I suppose most do.  All mine are older, however.

September 23, 2020

A review of the RUC bill, which can be read here, indicates that in fact the law anticipates automobiles being retrofitted with GPS devices or individuals having to report their odometer readers.

It further envisions six categories of motor vehicles with six different charge per mile rates.  Looking at it and roughly figuring it, it would cost me a little under $5.00 in tax to drive my truck to Laramie.  The gas tax is supposed to be phased out after it passes, if it does.

Again, it may be just me but I have a very hard time imaging the average Wyomingite liking the idea of retrofitting their vehicle with a GPS monitor for any reason.

The same committee also advanced a bill to increase the penalties for not wearing seat belts and to allow law enforcement authorities to stop motorists for not wearing them.

November 13, 2020

A bill has been prefiled to make it illegal to possess hemp for smoking and also limiting the use of CBD, including prohibiting it from being inserted into alcoholic beverages.  This bill comes about to address what has been regarded as a sort of loophole in Wyoming's current laws which prohibit the possession of marijuana.  With the increase in hemp products and the legalization of marijuana in neighboring states the tasks faced by law enforcement have become more difficult.

November 16, 2020

A bill to allow for liquor license holders to deliver alcohol failed to pass committee.

A bill to increase the tax on wind generated electricity narrowly passed committee.

November 19, 2020

The hemp bill mentioned failed in committee.  Fears existed it would hurt the state's infant hemp growing industry.

A bill to document and replace aging water infrastructure failed in committee.

November 21, 2020

Tax proposals to have a target real estate tax and an income tax both aimed at the wealthy failed to pass committee narrowly.

The income tax would have imposed a 4% tax on those making $200,000 per year or more, with it being estimated that this would have yielded $100,000,000 in revenue to the state per  year.  The proposal on the real estate tax was to add a low percentage tax on the sale of property selling for more than $250,000.

While the committee vote was narrow, there were those who expressed hope in taxing wealthy migrants to the state who have, as a practical matter, driven up the price of land, particularly in some counties.  Others, however, reported hoped that within a couple of years things would return to normal for the fossil fuel industry.

November 25, 2020

The Legislature is pushing back its opening to the spring, rather than January, due to the pandemic.

December 2, 2020

A bill to regulate self driving automobiles has advanced in committee.  The bill does not prevent them in any fashion, but establishes a protocol for them, which a majority of states have now done.  Autonomous buses are going to be experimented with in Yellowstone National Park shortly.

January 12, 2021

The legislature convenes today. This year's session will be odd in that it will commence with an electronic session and be broken into three parts.

January 13, 2021

The legislature adjourned today and will proceed with remote sessions until March.   The move was opposed by newly elected far right candidates.

While not directly related, obviously, the convening session come  at a time during which the largely Republican body is faced with its fissures splitting wide open at a national level. As addressed elsewhere on this blog the Trump wing of the party has been a rising force in Wyoming and is now more in control of the party than not, although its not more in control of the legislature than not.  The Laramie County and Natrona County wings (and I'd guess the Albany County wing) remain held by the traditional Wyoming centric establishment wing of the party but the balance of the party has gone over to the Trump wing, including its leadership.  Indeed, the leader of the party was at the Washington D. C. protests that developed into an insurrection last week, although he claims that he was back in his hotel prior to the rebellion taking place. Two ultra conservative Wyoming Republican legislators were at a protest in Cheyenne in which they demanded that Liz Cheney, who is now one of the premier members of the conservative wing of the party, be hauled in front of the legislature in order to account for herself, a statement now rich with irony and which was at the time.

This session has a lot before it, but one thing that is looming in the background is that the state's Republican legislature was already engaged in a smoldering civil war within its own ranks that has now broken out nationally and in which the Trump wing is set to be set back in its place or the party will outright severe into two.  Additionally, up to November 2020 the state legislature could look towards a friendly Senate and Oval Office.  From November to January 6, the state legislature could look towards an improved situation in the House, a friendly Senate, and a probably neutral Oval Office.  Now it can look back and see a hostile House, Senate, and Oval Office.  With a national voting power which amounts to less than that of the City of Dayton, Ohio, this is going to matter.

January 19, 2021

It appears that due to budget considerations efforts to form a new college district in Campbell County will be delayed.

January 20, 2021

A bill in the legislature proposes to raise cigarette taxes by .14 a pack.

A bill proposes to make "games of skill" legal in certain venues.

A filed bill would provide for certain informed consent provisions for abortions.

A bill proposes to do away with net metering for electricity and place the topic in the hands of a commission.  Proponents of home electricity generating units fear that this will result in the death of the home generation via solar and wind units.

January 21, 2021

A bill to repeal taxes on female sanitary products failed.

January 29, 2021

Governor Gordon and Legislators Launch Initiative to Simplify, Focus Budgeting Process

One checking, one savings account proposal emphasizes transparency, living within our means

 

CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Pushing forward with his continued efforts to improve and simplify Wyoming’s budgeting process, Governor Mark Gordon is calling for an end to the use of multiple spending and savings accounts to fund state government. His goal is to move to one checking and one savings account for Wyoming. 

“The complex system that currently exists includes numerous accounts and ‘coffee cans’ that obscure the state’s financial position. This does not serve the public, who deserve a transparent way to know exactly what our fiscal situation is,” Governor Gordon said. “This can be achieved by simplifying the budgeting process.”

Governor Gordon is supporting Senate File 0071 sponsored by the Senate Appropriations Committee that would eliminate the Strategic Investments and Projects Account (SIPA). Established in 2013, the SIPA account was originally intended to capture investment income that would have otherwise flowed into the Permanent Mineral Trust Fund. In recent years accounts have been created that will divert funds from the SIPA, such as the Wyoming State Penitentiary Capital Construction  Account and the Legislative Deficit Control Account.

“These are examples of new pots of money being created which deviate from the original purpose of the SIPA and complicate the budgeting process,” the Governor said.

The bill has received legislative support from Senate Vice President Larry Hicks, a member of the Joint Appropriations Committee: 

The SIPA was a legislatively created invention to pigeon hole money for construction of large projects at a time when the state was running hundreds of millions of dollars in surplus revenues,” Hicks said. “It added significant complexity while reducing transparency of state expenditures in the budget. In recent years it has not been used for what its original purpose was, but rather as a slush fund to pay for programs and projects that should have come out of the state’s general fund. We no longer have surplus revenues in Wyoming and it's time to restore transparency in our budgeting process by eliminating the SIPA account.”

The Governor said that he believes this bill is a good first step towards only having one checking account. He will work on other proposals with legislators this session and over the next year.

--END--

January 30, 2021

Proposed Senate Resolution No. 1 proposes to require a vote of the citizenry in order to authorize any new taxes or tax increases in the state.

A similar, but more limited, law in California which passed by initiative and referendum has made paying for California's government nearly impossible over the years leading in part to the constant state of crisis the state exists in.

February 2, 2021

The legislature rejected an attempt to require the PSC to impose a moratorium on the closure of coal fired plants.  The attempt was in the form of a bill on supplemental funding for the PSC which would have tied the funding to the PSC taking this step.   The measure narrowly failed.

The bill would have required the PSC to impose a moratorium on closures until 2035 as "a statement".

Legislators supporting the bill have been angered by the PSC's allowance of closures, but this raises an interesting economic point in that the facility owners are closing them for economic reasons, not policy ones.  As we've noted here before, this has much more to do with the very long term decline of coal than anything else.  Given that, forcing the plants to remain open is oddly anti free market and punished the owners of the plants, and the shareholders of those corporations, due to a market trend.

What the supporters really hope is that a case at the Supreme Court right now will result in Montana, Oregon and Washington being forced to accept Wyoming coal by rail, to an as of now nonexistent coal shipping port.  It might be of note that this same week a new generation of Chinese nuclear power plant came on line and that they've been building nuclear plants rapidly.  The trend line is clear, even though China has built a large number of coal fired plants as well.  Of course, coal fired power plants are specifically designed for coal from certain fields and there's no real good reason to believe that the Chinese would be receptive to large amounts of Wyoming coal even if it could be shipped.  Moreover, the current administration will undoubtedly block the shipment of coal in any event.

February 3, 2021

A bill has been introduced to tax solar energy generation on a basis that seeks to be equivalent with that on wind.

February 4, 2021

The legislature will hold an in person session in March.  Members of the legislature will be given an opportunity to be vaccinated beforehand.

February 5, 2021

Governor Gordon Unveils His Initiative to Strengthen and Expand Wyoming’s Economic Pillars 

 

Multi-pronged Effort Will Boost Wyoming’s Energy, Tourism and Agriculture Sectors

 

CHEYENNE, Wyo. –  Governor Gordon is taking steps to expand Wyoming’s economic recovery, with a series of proposals and initiatives to further the state’s economic plan by adding value to and bolstering the state’s energy, tourism and agriculture sectors. 

Energy

The Governor is redoubling efforts to strengthen Wyoming’s economy and an “all the above” energy industry. Energy and mining are the largest providers of Wyoming’s revenues and have enormous impacts on the state's wider employment picture as well. The Governor’s effort became even more important after last week’s announcement by the Biden administration banning new oil and gas leases. The Governor supports bills granting severance tax relief to the energy industry  and enhancing the ability of the newly created Wyoming Energy Authority to encourage development of carbon capture technology, trona, rare earth elements and critical minerals. 

“The energy and mining sectors are the major pillars of our economy and they have provided the wherewithal that gives this nation the luxury of looking to new forms of energy,” Governor Gordon said. “Let me be clear. Our traditional industries will adapt and continue to provide the reliable, affordable and dispatchable power they always have, only better. Our economic recovery will hinge on the health of these industries and their ability to adapt to changing market demands. Wyoming can continue to grow even as our mix of energy supplies evolve.” 

“While some are suggesting the early demise of coal – and right now it faces many challenges – we believe that coal coupled with new technologies is an essential part of the solution to reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) in our atmosphere,” the Governor continued. “Carbon capture and the development of carbon byproducts will be part of Wyoming’s energy future. So too, should be efforts to research extracting the rare earth elements and critical minerals associated with coal that will be needed for the batteries powering the anticipated worldwide build-out of wind and solar power.”

Tourism

Tourism continues to be a major driver of the state’s economy and employs the most Wyoming people. 2020 brought in record numbers of visitors, supporting Wyoming businesses and sustaining jobs for residents. HB0058, sponsored by the Joint Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources committee, would allow for a $1.1 million general fund reduction to State Parks with little to no impact to customer service or safety by allowing them to use self-generated funds (fees) to a greater degree for operations and outdoor recreation, rather than capital construction. This supports our economy and local communities.

“Our State Parks provide world-class experiences and opportunities for tourists and residents alike and saw a statewide increase of roughly 36% in visitation last year, a trend that is expected to continue into 2021,” Governor Gordon said. “It’s critical to ensure we continue to properly fund these parks and historic sites, which play a critical role in our state’s economy.”

Agriculture

Multiple bills related to meat processing are being considered at this time and the Governor is working with the legislature to expand processing capacity in the state. 

“This is only a part of an ambitious initiative focused on adding value to products across the entire spectrum of agricultural enterprise,” said Governor Gordon. “This effort is essential to grow this key part of our economy.”

Of particular interest to both the Governor and the First Lady is HB0052 Wyoming School Protein Enhancement Project sponsored by the Joint Agriculture Committee. Not only would this bill help school districts increase Wyoming meat products in school nutrition programs, it would provide another opportunity to feed those children who do not get enough to eat every day, a major emphasis of the First Lady’s Hunger Initiative. 

The Governor welcomed the passage of HB-0053 Invasive Plant Species today. The legislation would implement several of the recommendations made in the final report of the Governor’s Invasive Species Initiative and allow local districts more latitude when implementing special management programs for invasive species. 

Senator Tara Nethercott, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Speaker of the House Eric Barlow are developing a bill to improve the Attorney General's civil enforcement authority in antitrust matters, providing a much-needed update to the state statute meant to ensure fair competition within Wyoming's marketplace. In 2020, Wyoming ranchers were adversely impacted by consolidations and acquisitions within the broader agriculture industry. However, the State was barred from investigating these actions because current state antitrust laws do not allow the Attorney General to investigate potential violations.

Speaker Barlow and Senator Nethercott's bill ensures that Wyoming will not need to rely on other states or the federal government to assert our residents' interests in a competitive market which benefits businesses and consumers alike. The bill will not only benefit our agriculture industry, but will ensure fair competition across all markets in Wyoming, the Governor said. 

“Protecting our ranching and agricultural community is more important now than ever with Wyoming's challenging economic outlook,” Senator Nethercott said. “The market manipulation we have seen this past year highlighting our nation's meat prices is harmful to Wyoming producers and consumers.  I am proud to sponsor this bill to empower our Attorney General to act first in protecting all of Wyoming's industries and consumers from these unlawful practices.”

-END-

February 6, 2021

A bill has been introduced to make the position of Attorney General of Wyoming an elective office.  Looking at the sponsors, the bill was sponsored in both houses by the most right wing members of the legislature.

This is a curious bill as the AG doesn't have the same role in Wyoming that the AG does in many other states, something which perhaps didn't occur, or perhaps did, to those sponsoring the bill. The appointed position is the chief legal officer of the current administration at any one time, like the Attorney General of the United States.  Unlike the Federal AG,  however, or that position in many other states, the AG isn't the "chief crime fighter" and he or she (it's Bridget Hill right now) has very little in the way of that particular set of duties, although she or he does have a little.

It makes much more sense to have the position organized as it currently is, as the Governor's office directs the current direction of the Attorney Generals Office which is mostly made up of career AG attorneys.  Making the position an elected one wouldn't change that, but it would make the position political.

Which gets to a broader point.  Arguably Wyoming has too many elective offices, not too few. There's no good reason why assessors and coroners officers, for example, aren't appointed county officials rather than elected ones in this day and age.  Providing that they had to be occupied by professionally qualified positions and hiring individuals who hold those professional degrees would actually make more sense than the current system.

Indeed, another such example is the Sheriff's office.  Having an elected sheriff made sense at the time that the sheriff was the only law enforcement officer for the county, but now sheriff's personnel are a minority of law enforcement officers.  Because the position is elected, however, a sheriff is free to ignore his county commission, whose only real control over him is his budget, which the commission sets.

That last example should be a cautionary tale here, in regard to the legislature.  Elected AGs have, in many states, been elected on either highly populist or highly liberal platforms.  In office, they feel bound by those platforms which can set them against the wishes of the sitting governor.  And even if they aren't from the political fringes, an elected AG would feel independent, rightfully, of the sitting administration. Those sponsoring this bill, for example, no doubt imagine an AG who would zealously pursue the current coal litigation, which is highly unlikely to be successful, but in reality they might get an indecently minded lawyer who would recognize that and simply refuse to pursue it at some point, being free to do just that as that person would be an elected official.

The text:

SENATE FILE NO. SF0086

 

 

Attorney general-elected official.

 

Sponsored by: Senator(s) Bouchard, Biteman, French, Hutchings, James, McKeown and Salazar and Representative(s) Baker, Bear, Fortner, Gray, Jennings, Laursen, Styvar and Wharff

 

 

A BILL

 

for

 

AN ACT relating to the attorney general; providing for the election of the attorney general; designating the attorney general as a state elected official; setting the attorney general's term of office; setting the attorney general's salary; providing for filling a vacancy in the position; repealing and modifying provisions for interim appointment; providing for the application of the Ethics and Disclosure Act and other laws to the office of the attorney general and attorney general as a state elected official; amending certain provisions regarding actions the attorney general takes requiring approval of or pursuant to the direction of the governor; prescribing additional duties of the attorney general; making conforming amendments; and providing for effective dates.

 

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:

 

Section 1.  W.S. 91601, 95101(a), 222105(a)(ii)(intro) and 226117(a)(iv) are amended to read:

 

91601.  Appointment; term; removal; special assistant for legislative affairs; qualifications.

 

(a)  Until the term of office commences following the general election in 2022, the attorney general of the state of Wyoming shall be appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate in accordance with W.S. 2812101 through 2812103 and may be removed by the governor as provided in W.S. 91202. Beginning at the general election in 2022, the attorney general shall be elected in a statewide election for a term of four (4) years.

 

(b)  Prior to the general election in 2022, if a newly elected governor appoints an attorney general to take office prior to or during the legislative session next following the governor's election, the newly appointed attorney general designee shall become a member of the attorney general's staff to serve as a special assistant to the governor for legislative affairs. When the legislative session adjourns the attorney general's term of office shall terminate. Following the general election in 2022, the term of an attorney general appointed under this section shall terminate the first Monday in January next following the general election.

 

(c)  Prior to his To be eligible for appointment or election, the attorney general shall have been a practicing attorney for at least four (4) years,. At the date of appointment, he shall be in good standing in the courts of record of this state and shall be a resident and elector of the state.

 

95101.  State building commission; composition; general powers and duties; conflicts of interest.

 

(a)  The five (5) elected state officers governor, secretary of state, state auditor, state treasurer and state superintendent of public instruction shall constitute the state building commission. The governor shall be chairman of the commission, but in his absence from any meeting, one (1) of the members may act as chairman, and shall preside at the meeting. All votes taken to decide the commission's final action on any matter shall be recorded.

 

222105.  Terms of office and offices voted on at general elections.

 

(a)  The terms of office and offices voted on at general elections are as follows:

 

(ii)  Four Year Term.  At the general election in 1974 and in every fourth (4th) year thereafter, there shall be elected the following officers: one (1) governor, one (1) secretary of state, one (1) state treasurer, one (1) state auditor, one (1) superintendent of public instruction, county clerks, county treasurers, county assessors, county coroners, county and prosecuting attorneys, district attorneys, sheriffs, clerks of the district court. At every general election there shall be elected the necessary member or members of the Wyoming senate and county commissioners. At the general election in 2022 and every fourth year thereafter, there shall be elected an attorney general. The question of retention of a circuit court judge or a magistrate of the circuit court shall be submitted:

 

226117.  Order of listing offices in partisan elections.

 

(a)  The major party primary and general partisan election ballots shall contain the offices to be voted on in the following order:

 

(iv)  Candidates for governor, secretary of state, state auditor, state treasurer, the attorney general beginning at the 2022 primary and general election, and superintendent of public instruction;

 

Section 2.  W.S. 126509(k), 131103, 135103(a), 135104, 73102, 722101(a)(vi), 722102(a), (b), (c)(intro) and (d), 722108(a), 81102(a)(xii), 82101(a)(vi), 91101(b), 91211(a) by creating a new paragraph (vi) and by renumbering (vi) through (viii) as (vii) through (ix), 91602, 91603(b) and (c), 91604, 91605(b) through (d), 91608(a) and (b), 91611(c), 91633(a) and (b)(intro), 91636(b) and (c)(intro), 921016(h)(i), 93101(a) by creating a new paragraph (viii), 94218(a)(iii), 913102(a)(xii)(A) and (xvi), 913108(a)(intro), 914101, 914102(c), 183902(a), 2218111(a)(intro), 281115(g)(ii), 2812102(c) and by creating a new subsection (d), 3571004, 35111507(a) and 3521110(a) are amended to read:

 

126509.  Negotiations; scope of efforts to purchase.

 

(k)  Attorney's fees and other expenses awarded under this section from a public entity to a condemnee shall be reported by the public entity which paid the fees, to the Wyoming attorney general within sixty (60) days of the award. The Wyoming attorney general shall collect this data and report annually to the governor joint revenue interim committee and joint judiciary interim committee on the amount of all taxpayer funded fee awards, beginning July 31, 2014. The report shall identify the name of each party to whom an award was made, the name of each counsel of record representing each party to whom an award was made, the public agency which paid each award and the total amount of each award.

 

131103.  Commencement of action.

 

The attorney general or a county attorney shall may commence an action when directed by the governor, supreme court or legislature, or when upon complaint or otherwise he has good reason to believe that such an action can be established by proof. The attorney general may commence an action when requested by the governor, supreme court or legislature. A county attorney shall commence an action when directed by the governor, supreme court or legislature.

 

135103.  Violation of state contracts to be reported to attorney general; investigation; action to recover damages; employment of special assistants.

 

(a)  Any officer, board or commission of the state of Wyoming, or their legal counsel, responsible for the enforcement of any contract between the state of Wyoming and any person, having reason to believe that there has been a violation of the terms of the contract to the damage of the state of Wyoming, shall report the matter to the attorney general of the state of Wyoming. The attorney general shall make such investigation of the matter as is necessary. Upon completion of the investigation and finding of probable damages to the state of Wyoming, the attorney general may bring suit in any court of competent jurisdiction to recover all damages that the state of Wyoming may have incurred by reason of the breach of contract, or for any money or other property that may be due on the contract. Subject to the governor's approval he The attorney general may employ specially qualified assistants or counsel to aid in any investigation of such action.

 

135104.  Actions under control of attorney general; settlement or compromise with approval of governor.

 

The attorney general shall control all investigations and actions instituted and conducted in on behalf of the state as provided in W.S. 135103 and has full discretionary powers to prosecute all investigations and litigation andwith the approval of the governor, to settle, compromise or dismiss the actions.

 

73102.  Appointment of attorney general to represent state on joint commissions.

 

The governor shall appoint the attorney general is hereby appointed as the commissioner who shall represent Wyoming upon any joint commission created by Wyoming and any one (1) or more states for the purpose of negotiating and entering into agreements or compacts for cooperative effort and mutual assistance in the prevention of crime and in the enforcement of the respective criminal laws and policies of Wyoming and any other state and for the establishment of agencies deemed desirable for making effective any agreement or compact.

 

722101.  Definitions.

 

(a)  As used in this article:

 

(vi)  "Five (5) Six (6) state elected officials" means the governor, secretary of state, state auditor, state treasurer, attorney general and superintendent of public instruction;

 

722102.  Authority to contract; general conditions.

 

(a)  The state or a local government may contract with private entities for the construction, lease (as lessor or lessee), acquisition, improvement, operation, maintenance, purchase or management of facilities and services as provided in this article, but only after receiving the consent of the five (5) six (6) state elected officials as to site, number of beds and classifications of inmates or prisoners to be housed in the facility.

 

(b)  No contract shall be entered into or renewed unless the contracting governmental entity, with the concurrence of the five (5) six (6) state elected officials, determines the contract offers substantial cost savings to the contracting governmental entity and at least the same quality of services provided by the state or by similar local governments.

 

(c)  After receiving the majority consent of the five (5) six (6) state elected officials as to the site, number of beds and classifications of inmates or prisoners to be housed in the facility, the state or the local government may contract with private entities for the construction, lease (as lessor or lessee), acquisition, improvement, operation, maintenance, purchase or management of facilities, either:

 

(d)  The state or the local government may reject or return prisoners from outside the state. Prisoners or inmates of outofstate, nonfederal jurisdictions shall not be incarcerated in any facility operated by a local government entity under this article without the consent of the majority of the five (5) six (6) state elected officials. of this state. At no time shall the number of prisoners from outofstate, nonfederal jurisdictions incarcerated in a facility operated by a local government entity under this article exceed thirty percent (30%) of the capacity of that facility. Any outofstate, nonfederal prisoner shall be returned to the jurisdiction of origin to be released from custody by them, outside the state of Wyoming at the appropriate time.

 

722108.  Monitoring; right of access.

 

(a)  The contracting governmental entity at the contractor's expense, shall employ an individual to be responsible for monitoring all aspects of the private contractor's performance under a contract for the operation of a facility pursuant to W.S. 722102. The individual employed as contract monitor shall be qualified to perform this function by reason of education, training and experience as determined by the five (5) six (6) state elected officials. At a minimum, the contract monitor shall have completed at least the same training required by this article for detention officers and shall have served a minimum of three (3) years as a detention officer. The monitor, with the approval of the contracting governmental entity, shall appoint staff as necessary to assist in monitoring at the facility, which staff shall be at the contractor's expense and will be solely responsible to the contract monitor. The monitor or his designee shall be provided an onsite work area by the contractor, shall be onsite on a daily basis, and shall have access to all areas of the facility and to inmates and staff at all times. The contractor shall provide any and all data, reports and other materials that the monitor determines are necessary to carry out monitoring responsibilities under this section.

 

81102.  Definitions.

 

(a)  As used in the statutes unless the legislature clearly specifies a different meaning or interpretation or the context clearly requires a different meaning:

 

(xii)  "Elected state official" means the governor, secretary of state, state auditor, state treasurer, attorney general and superintendent of public instruction;

 

82101.  Distribution of statutes, supplements and session laws.

 

(a)  Statutes, supplements and session laws shall be distributed as provided by contract with the publisher or as directed by the management council, to the following, without charge:

 

(vi)  One (1) copy to each of the five (5) six (6) elected state officers;

 

91101.  Location of seat of government; residence of state officials; deputies authorized; state superintendent of public instruction physical office designation.

 

(b)  The governor, secretary of state, state treasurer, state auditor, attorney general and state superintendent of public instruction shall reside and maintain their offices at the seat of government.

 

91211.  Vacancy in office of governor; successor designated; order of succession; proclamation on succession.

 

(a)  If the governor is removed, dies, resigns or is unable to act, the state officer appearing highest on the following list who satisfies all constitutional qualifications for governor and is not under impeachment by the house of representatives shall act as governor until the disability of the governor is removed or a new governor is elected and qualified:

 

(vi)  Attorney general;

 

(vi)(vii)  State superintendent of public instruction;

 

(vii)(viii)  Vicepresident of the senate;

 

(viii)(ix)  Speaker pro tem of the house of representatives.

 

91602.  Vacancy in office.

 

In case of A vacancy in the office of attorney general the governor shall appoint a qualified person to fill the vacancy in accordance with the provisions of W.S. 2812101(b) shall be filled as provided by W.S. 2218111 except the vacancy shall be subject to senate confirmation as provided in W.S. 2812101 through 2812103.

 

91603.  Duties generally; retention of qualified practicing attorneys; matters in which county or state is party or has interest; assistance to county and district attorneys in felony trials; coordination of county and school safety activities.

 

(b)  With the approval of the governor The attorney general may retain qualified practicing attorneys to prosecute feegenerating suits for the state if expertise in a particular field is desirable.

 

(c)  Upon the failure or refusal of any district or county attorney to act in any criminal or civil case or matter in which the county, state or any agency thereof is a party, or has an interest, the attorney general may, at the request of the board of county commissioners of the county involved or of the district judge of the judicial district involved, act on behalf of the county, state or any agency thereof, if after a thorough investigation the action is deemed advisable by the attorney general. The cost of investigation and the cost of any prosecution arising therefrom shall be paid out of the general fund of the county where the investigation and prosecution take place. The attorney general shall may also, upon direction of the governor, investigate any matter in any county of the state in which the county, state or any agency thereof may be interested. After investigation, the attorney general shall submit a report of the investigation to the governor and to the district or county attorney of each county involved and may take such other action as he deems appropriate.

 

91604.  Office in state capital; private practice prohibited; exception.

 

The attorney general shall keep an office in the state capital, shall not open an office elsewhere and shall not engage in any private practice except to consummate business pending at the time of his appointment election if not in conflict with the duties of his office.

 

91605.  Approval of public securities and official bonds; water rights proceedings; investigation of misconduct of county official; commencement of action.

 

(b)  Under the direction of the governor The attorney general shall institute and pursue proceedings to maintain the state's and its citizens' rights in the waters of interstate streams.

 

(c)  Upon representation to the governor attorney general of misconduct or malfeasance in office or the commission of a crime by any county officer in the state and if the governor attorney general believes the ends of justice demand or the matter will not be properly investigated and prosecuted by the sheriff and by the district attorney of the county, the governor may direct the attorney general to may investigate the case.

 

(d)  Upon completion of the investigation, the attorney general shall report the results of the investigation and his recommendations to the governor. If the governor and the attorney general determine that the attorney general should may institute a criminal or civil action, the attorney general shall commence the action as he deems appropriate. The attorney general shall have the authority and duty vested in district attorneys in this state.

 

91608.  Assistant attorneys general.

 

(a)  With the approval of the governor, The attorney general may appoint assistant attorneys general necessary for the efficient operation of his office. Each assistant attorney general shall be a member in good standing of the Wyoming bar and shall serve at the pleasure of the attorney general. The assistants shall act under the direction of the attorney general and his deputies. The attorney general, his deputies or his assistants may appear in any courts of the state or the United States and prosecute or defend on behalf of the state. An appearance by the attorney general or his staff does not waive the sovereign immunity of the state.

 

(b)  With the approval of the governor The attorney general may appoint special assistant attorneys general for any purposes. A person shall not be employed as an attorney or legal counsel by any department, board, agency, commission or institution of the state, or represent the state in that capacity, except by the written appointment of the attorney general. Written appointment of the attorney general shall not be required for the employment of legal counsel by elected state officials.

 

91611.  Division of criminal investigation; created; definitions; director; appointment; qualifications.

 

(c)  With the approval of the governor, The attorney general shall appoint a director who is the chief administrative officer and chief agent of the division.

 

91633.  Wyoming law enforcement academy; director; appointment; term; qualifications; employees; salaries; curriculum and training programs; fees; disposition.

 

(a)  A director of the Wyoming law enforcement academy shall be appointed by the attorney general with the consent of the governor. The director and shall serve at the pleasure of the attorney general. He governor. The director shall have administrative and operational experience in criminal justice and such other qualifications as are satisfactory to the attorney general governor.

 

(b)  The director may employ assistants, instructors and other personnel as approved by the attorney general with the consent of the governor. The attorney general may appoint the director as a peace officer, if qualified pursuant to W.S. 91701 through 91707. The director may appoint fulltime staff instructors who qualify pursuant to W.S. 91701 through 91707 to perform as peace officers. Persons appointed as peace officers pursuant to this subsection shall be considered peace officers only:

 

91636.  Division of victim services; created; appointment of director and deputy director; administrative and clerical employees; definitions.

 

(b)  With the approval of the governor, The attorney general shall appoint a director who is the chief administrative officer of the division. The director is responsible to the attorney general for the operation of the division and shall serve at the pleasure of the attorney general.

 

(c)  With the consent of the attorney general and the governor, and subject to legislative appropriation, the director may:

 

921016.  General services division.

 

(h)  The general services division shall:

 

(i)  Manage and control all state motor vehicles and equipment including their identification, purchase, lease, replacement, repair and permanent assignment, except for state owned or leased vehicles personally used by or assigned to the governor, secretary of state, state auditor, state treasurer, attorney general or superintendent of public instruction;

 

93101.  Salaries; amount; date of payment.

 

(a)  Salaries for clerk of the supreme court and district court reporters shall be determined by the supreme court as authorized by legislative appropriations. Subject to constitutional limitations the following state officers and members of the judiciary shall receive the salaries indicated by the figures following their respective titles:

 

(viii)  Attorney General  $175,000.00.

 

94218.  Federal natural resource policy account created; purposes.

 

(a)  There is created an account known as the "federal natural resource policy account." Funds within the account may be expended by the governor on behalf of the state of Wyoming and its local governments, to take any of the actions specified in this subsection related to federal land, water, air, mineral and other natural resource policies which may affect the tax base of the state, wildlife management, state species, recreation, private property rights, water rights or leasehold rights. Funds also may be expended for preparing and participating in environmental impact statements and environmental assessments, including analysis of economic or social and natural or physical environmental effects on the human environment. Funds also may be expended for coordinating and participating in rangeland health assessments pursuant to W.S. 112207. The governor may expend funds from the federal natural resource policy account for:

 

(iii)  Investigating, initiating, intervening or otherwise participating in litigation, or taking any other legal action by the state, a state agency or the counties of the state individually or jointly, that furthers the purposes of this subsection. In carrying out this subsection, the attorney general, or the counties, with approval of the governor, may retain qualified practicing attorneys to act for the state or the counties, including providing representation in other forums with the federal government or other state or county governments that may preclude or resolve any outstanding issues or attempting to influence pertinent federal legislation;

 

913102.  Definitions.

 

(a)  As used in this article:

 

(xii)  "Public employee" means any of the following state employees:

 

(A)  The attorney general and the director of any department of the executive branch appointed by the governor under W.S. 921706, or the director of any legislative agency;

 

(xvi)  "State office" means the state offices of governor, treasurer, superintendent of public instruction, auditor, secretary of state, attorney general and member of the state legislature;

 

913108.  Disclosure required.

 

(a)  Not later than January 31 annually, each of the state's five (5) six (6) elected officials and each member of the Wyoming legislature shall file a financial disclosure form with the secretary of state. The form shall be signed by the elected official or legislator filing it and under a certification that it is accurate. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the financial disclosure form shall contain the following information current as of January 15 of that year:

 

914101.  Second amendment defense.

 

The attorney general may seek to intervene or file an amicus curiae brief in any lawsuit filed in any state or federal court in Wyoming, or filed against any Wyoming citizen or firm in any other jurisdiction for damages for injuries as a result of the use of firearms that are not defective, if in his judgment, the action endangers the constitutional right of citizens of Wyoming to keep and bear arms. The attorney general is directed to advance arguments that protect the constitutional right to bear arms. Before intervening in any lawsuit pursuant to this section, the attorney general shall obtain the approval of the governor.

 

914102.  Unauthorized federal agency actions.

 

(c)  The attorney general may seek to take action before the federal environmental protection agency, the federal occupational safety and health administration or in any state or federal court to stop the enforcement, administration or implementation of rulemaking or other actions taken by those agencies if, in his judgment, the rulemaking or other action exceeds the authority granted by the United States congress or otherwise rests on questionable authority. Before intervening in or initiating any lawsuit pursuant to this section, the attorney general shall obtain the approval of the governor.

 

183902.  Attorney general to commence action; petition served with summons; pleading; trial; judgment; change of judge.

 

(a)  Whenever it appears to the governor attorney general on the verified complaint of qualified electors or the board of county commissioners of the county that any county officer is guilty of misconduct or malfeasance in office, he may direct the attorney general to may commence and prosecute an action in the district court of the county in which the officer is an official asking for the removal of the officer. The action shall be commenced by the filing of a verified petition in the name of the state of Wyoming signed by the attorney general setting forth the facts constituting the misconduct or malfeasance in office.

 

2218111.  Vacancies in other offices; temporary appointments.

 

(a)  Any vacancy in any other elective office in the state except representative in congress or the board of trustees of a school or community college district, shall be filled by the governing body, or as otherwise provided in this section, by appointment of a temporary successor. Except as provided in W.S. 2812101(b) with respect to the office of attorney general, the person appointed shall serve until a successor for the remainder of the unexpired term is elected at the next general election and takes office on the first Monday of the following January.  Provided, if a vacancy in a four (4) year term of office occurs in the term's second or subsequent years after the first day for filing an application for nomination pursuant to W.S. 225209, no election to fill the vacancy shall be held and the temporary successor appointed shall serve the remainder of the unexpired term.  The following apply:

 

281115.  Submission of state agency plans to legislature; contents; purposes.

 

(g)  For purposes of this section and W.S. 281116, "state agency" means:

 

(ii)  Offices of the five (5) elected state officials and the attorney general governor, secretary of state, state auditor, state treasurer, attorney general and state superintendent of public instruction; and

 

2812102.  Senate consideration of gubernatorial appointments; procedure; roll call vote required.

 

(c)  Except as provided in subsection (d), if the senate does not consent to a nominee for a given office, the governor shall submit the name, address and biography of another person for senate consideration if the legislature is still in session. If the legislature has adjourned, the governor may make a temporary appointment as provided in W.S. 2812101(b). No person rejected by the senate shall be appointed to or serve in, either temporarily or otherwise, the public office for which his nomination was rejected.

 

(d)  If the senate does not consent to a nominee to fill a vacancy in the office of attorney general submitted by the governor pursuant to W.S. 2218111(a)(i), the governor shall submit the name of another person from those provided pursuant to W.S. 2218111(a)(i) for senate consideration if the legislature is still in session.  If there are no qualified persons remaining for consideration then the process outlined in W.S. 2218111(a)(i) shall begin again.  If the legislature has adjourned, the governor shall make a temporary appointment as provided in W.S. 2812101(b) from persons whose names are submitted pursuant to W.S. 2218111(a)(i). No person rejected by the senate shall be appointed to or serve in, either temporarily or otherwise, the office of attorney general.

 

3571004.  Personnel to administer provisions.

 

The attorney general by and with the consent of the governor may employ such personnel as necessary to administer this act. Such personnel shall serve at the pleasure of the attorney general at such compensation as may be approved by the Wyoming personnel division. Said personnel shall be assigned such duties as may be necessary to assist the commissioner in the performance of his responsibilities under this act for the efficient operation of the work of the office.

 

35111507.  Injunction proceedings; penalties.

 

(a)  When, in the opinion of the governor attorney general, a person is violating or is about to violate any provision of this article, the governor attorney general shall direct the attorney general to apply to the appropriate court for an order enjoining the person from engaging or continuing to engage in the activity. Upon a showing that the person has engaged, or is about to engage in the activity, the court may grant a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order.

 

3521110.  Statewide protection order registry.

 

(a)  The Wyoming attorney general or another agency designated by the governor shall establish a statewide registry of protection orders related to domestic violence and shall maintain a complete and systematic record and index of all valid temporary and final civil and criminal court orders of protection.

 

Section 3.  W.S. 91618(b)(i) is repealed.

 

Section 4.

 

(a)  Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this act is effective July 1, 2021.

 

(b)  Sections 2 and 3 of this act are effective January 2, 2023.

 

(END)

 

1

SF0086

 

A bill has been introduced to make the personnel files of high ranked state officials public records.

A bill has been introduced to require school districts to exist only on the county level.

The legislature, it should be noted, has passed 33 bills so far in this session, all of which are in the workaday non controversial category.

February 9, 2021

Not in the legislature, but related to it, the Wyoming Republican Party's central committee passed a resolution seeking to severely restrict absentee voting in Wyoming.

Wyoming has had successful absentee voting for decades now so the move appears to be unrelated to anything going on in Wyoming but rather is part of the persistent hard right GOP belief that something went wrong with it elsewhere this year.  The resolution also seeks to stop the use of electronic vote counting machines, which are sued, and again successfully, in Wyoming.  It also seeks to ban the use of "drop boxes", which aren't used in Wyoming.

The party's leadership is very much in the Trumpite camp and is demonstrating it through a series of resolutions such as this, most notably the recent resolution to censure Liz Cheney.  How this will play out by 2022 isn't clear, but it seems likely that the ultimate end of this will not be good for the party.  On this particular topic, this is a retrograde movement that seeks to do away with decades of common Wyoming practice and one that was particularly widely used this year given the COVID 19 pandemic.

The party is hoping this will find expression in legislation this year.

HB 106 seeks to provide money to the parents of home schooled children or those attending private schools.  It's text reads:

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0106

 

 

Wyoming education options act.

 

Sponsored by: Representative(s) Wilson, Andrew, Duncan, Gray, Jennings and Zwonitzer and Senator(s) Boner, Ellis and Steinmetz

 

 

A BILL

 

for

 

AN ACT relating to education; establishing the Wyoming education options act; authorizing reimbursement of private school costs for students; providing rulemaking authority; requiring reports; and providing for effective dates.

 

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:

 

Section 1.  W.S. 214507 is created to read:

 

214507.  Wyoming education options act.

 

(a)  As used in this section "private school" means education provided in person or by virtual or correspondence methods and includes any nonpublic school providing a basic academic educational program for a resident child in any grade of kindergarten through grade twelve (12). "Private school" may include parochial, church or religious schools, or education provided by a parent, guardian, tutor or instructor in the home of the student, in the home of another student or in another agreed upon location through a cooperative arrangement with another parent or guardian.

 

(b)  The board of trustees of every school district in the state shall, in consideration of the cost savings to the district and upon a request submitted pursuant to this section, reimburse parents or guardians for the educational expenses of any student who is a resident in the school district and who is enrolled in a private school within that district or another district if the parent or guardian desires for the student to attend the private school. Any student who was not previously enrolled in the school district shall provide proof of residency and age.

 

(c)  The parent or guardian of a student attending private school may request reimbursement for educational expenses on a quarterly basis from the school district in which the student resides, including documented expenses for tutoring, tuition, fees, curriculum, supplemental materials and activities. The cumulative amount of reimbursement for a school year under this section shall be the lesser of the actual educational expenses or fifty percent (50%) of the per student amount received by the school district from the school foundation program computed under W.S. 2113309(p) and less adjustments made under W.S. 2113309(m)(v)(E). The department of education shall prescribe a form and shall adopt rules for requesting reimbursement that a school district shall use for purposes of this section. Based on reports provided to the department under subsection (f) of this section, the department may establish and maintain a database of expenses previously approved by districts for reimbursement under this section. The database shall not be construed to limit any expenses otherwise eligible for reimbursement under this section. Allowable expenses shall include any educational expenditure that is similar to an expenditure made by a school district, excluding purchases of vehicles or expenses for building construction or maintenance. The school district shall reimburse the parent or guardian within thirty (30) days of application. Requests for reimbursement under this subsection:

 

(i)  Shall include an itemized list of expenses on a form as specified by the department, including receipts or other proof of expenses as required by rule of the department;

 

(ii)  May include fees paid under W.S. 214506 for participation in school district activities;

 

(iii)  Shall not include costs of uniforms or clothing that the student would not be required to wear if attending a public school and shall not include any cost or expense for the time of a parent or guardian to provide instruction;

 

(iv)  Shall not include tuition paid to attend any school which receives funding from the state for educational instruction. This paragraph shall not apply to fees paid pursuant to W.S. 214506 for participation in school district activities;

 

(v)  Shall certify compliance with the requirements of W.S. 214102(b). A curriculum submitted by a parent or guardian shall be presumed to meet the requirements of a basic academic educational program unless demonstrated otherwise by the school district. No parent or guardian shall be required to use any curriculum used by the school district.

 

(d)  Parents intending to request reimbursement under this section shall notify the school district of their intent in writing no later than August 1 of each year for the fall semester of that year and December 1 of each year for the immediately following spring semester.

 

(e)  Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a student who is attending private school under this section shall not enroll as a student in the school district during that same semester and shall not use transportation services of the school district except for activities for which the student has paid fees under W.S. 214506. A student who is attending private school under this section may take statewide or district assessments administered under W.S. 212304, but those scores shall not be included in the school level performance ratings under W.S. 212204. If a student for any reason enrolls in a public school district in a semester for which the parent or guardian received reimbursement for private school under this section, the district may require the parent or guardian to remit a proportionate amount of that reimbursement to be paid back to the district for the costs of public school education.

 

(f)  If reimbursement is denied or not issued by the school district within thirty (30) days of an application:

 

(i)  The school district shall provide the applicant a written explanation of the reasons for denial. If the expense was not properly documented, the school district shall provide an opportunity to resubmit the reimbursement request and shall provide reimbursement within thirty (30) days of receiving a corrected report with eligible expenses;

 

(ii)  An applicant may appeal to the state department of education for expenses that are denied by a school district. The department shall approve reimbursement within ten (10) days of an appeal under this paragraph for all expenses that the department finds are allowable for reimbursement;

 

(iii)  The school district shall not withhold reimbursement for any expense due to the rejection of reimbursement for any other expense submitted by the same applicant.

 

(g)  If a school district determines that any expense reimbursed by the school district was in error or due to fraud by the applicant, the school district shall withhold that amount from any future valid claims for reimbursement by the same applicant.

 

(h)  A school district reimbursing a parent or guardian for the enrollment of a student in a private school under this section shall:

 

(i)  Include the student within its average daily membership (ADM) under W.S. 2113309(m)(iv) in accordance with rules and regulations of the department and shall receive all foundation program amounts associated with that student;

 

(ii)  Keep records of the number of students enrolled in private school under this section and the amounts reimbursed, with aggregated nonpersonally identifiable data available to the public;

 

(iii)  Not be responsible for developing an individualized education program (IEP) for a student who is attending a private school under this section;

 

(iv)  Report to the state department of education the number of students receiving reimbursement under this section and the amounts reimbursed by the district.

 

(j)  The department of education shall report the data required in paragraph (f)(iv) to the joint education committee not later than June 30 of every year.

 

Section 2.  The department of education shall adopt rules and forms pursuant to the provisions of W.S. 214507 as created by section 1 of this act not later than July 1, 2021.

 

Section 3.  

 

(a)  Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this act is effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.

 

(b)  Section 1 of this act is effective July 1, 2021.

There's something a bit intellectually inconsistent with this bill to some degree.  Some conservatives feel that state education is flawed as its conducted by the state, and there for the state has its hooks in it, for lack of a better way to put it. But funding is the ultimately hook, or at least that is commonly argued.

A bill has been introduced on fossil ownership:


SENATE FILE NO. SF0088

 

 

Ownership of fossils and artifacts.

 

Sponsored by: Senator(s) Kost, Boner, Driskill and Hicks and Representative(s) Barlow, Flitner and Sommers

 

 

A BILL

 

for

 

AN ACT relating to property and conveyances; specifying ownership of fossils, artifacts and non-fossilized animal remains discovered in split estates; and providing for an effective date.

 

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:

 

Section 1.  W.S. 341154 is created to read:

 

341154.  Ownership of fossils and artifacts.

 

(a)  The ownership of any fossil, artifact or non-fossilized animal remains discovered in the strata below the surface lands and waters of the state is vested in the owner of the surface estate, unless otherwise conveyed by a clear and express grant or governed by W.S. 74106.

 

(b)  When used in any instrument, unless the clear and express terms or the context of the instrument provide otherwise, the term "minerals" does not include fossils, artifacts or non-fossilized animal remains.

 

(c)  As used in this section:

 

(i)  "Fossil" means any fossilized remains, traces or imprints of organisms, preserved in or on the earth's crust, that are of paleontological interest and that provide information about the history of life on earth, but does not include oil, gas or other hydrocarbons;

 

(ii)  "Artifact" means any material remains of past human life or human activities that are of archaeological interest.

 

Section 2.  This act shall apply to any existing or future transfer of ownership of the strata below the surface lands and waters of the state.

 

Section 3.  This act is effective July 1, 2021.

Another has been introduced on hemp growing, precluding smokable variants from being grown. 

A bill has also been introduced to prohibit governmental entities from requiring vaccinations. 

SENATE FILE NO. SF0094

 

 

Prohibiting coerced vaccinations.

 

Sponsored by: Senator(s) Bouchard, Driskill, French, Hutchings, James, McKeown and Steinmetz and Representative(s) Bear, Fortner, Gray, Styvar, Wharff and Winter

 

 

A BILL

 

for

 

AN ACT relating to public health and safety; prohibiting governmental entities or public employees from forcing, requiring or coercing immunizations or vaccinations for COVID-19 or influenza; and providing for an effective date.

 

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:

 

Section 1.  W.S. 354140 is created to read:

 

354140.  No required vaccinations for COVID19 or influenza.

 

No governmental entity or public employee shall force, require or coerce a person to receive an immunization or vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), first detected in Wuhan, Hubei province, People's Republic of China, or influenza against the person's will, nor shall the state health officer include them in any required immunization under W.S. 214309. 

 

Section 2.  W.S. 354113(b)(intro) and 354115(a) by creating new paragraphs (iii) and (iv) are amended to read:

 

354113.  Treatment when consent is not available; quarantine.

 

(b)  Except as otherwise prohibited by W.S. 354140, during a public health emergency, the state health officer may subject a person to vaccination or medical treatment without consent in the following circumstances:

 

354115.  Definitions.

 

(a)  As used in this article:

 

(iii)  "Governmental entity" means as defined in W.S. 139103(a)(i);

 

(iv)  "Public employee" means any employee of, or person providing services as an independent contractor of, a governmental entity.

 

Section 3.  This act is effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.

 

(END)

 

1

SF0094

 

This latter bill would essentially mean that schools couldn't require their employees to be vaccinated.

A bill allowing those licensed in other areas who come into the state with their military spouses to practice in Wyoming has passed.  It provides:

ORIGINAL SENATE ENGROSSED

FILE NOSF0018

 

ENROLLED ACT NO. 13, SENATE

 

SIXTY-SIXTH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WYOMING

2021 GENERAL SESSION

 

 

 

 

AN ACT relating to professions and occupations; amending professional licensing requirements for military spouses; providing for the issuance of professional and occupational licenses to qualified applicants from other states; requiring rulemaking; and providing for effective dates.

 

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:

 

Section 1.  W.S. 331120 is created to read:

 

331120.  Professional and occupational licensure for qualified individuals licensed in other jurisdictions.

 

(a)  As used in this section:

 

(i)  "Active" means a status of occupational or professional licensure which has not been suspended, revoked or terminated and which is not otherwise inactive;

 

(ii)  "Applicant" means a natural person seeking licensure from a professional or occupational licensing board of this state;

 

(iii)  "Good standing" means a status of occupational or professional licensure which is in compliance with all requirements imposed by the issuing licensing, certification or registration authority;

 

(iv)  "License" means any license, certificate or registration required to practice an occupation or profession.

 

(b)  A professional or occupational licensing board shall issue a license to an applicant to allow the applicant to lawfully practice a profession or occupation requiring licensure in this state if the Wyoming licensing board determines that the applicant:

 

(i)  Holds a relevant, active occupational or professional license in good standing from another state that mandates substantially equivalent or more stringent educational, training, examination and experience requirements for licensure than the licensing entity in this state. Substantial equivalency shall be determined pursuant to rules adopted by the licensing board in Wyoming provided that:

 

(A)  The educational equivalency shall be determined by whether the degree required is a doctorate, master, bachelor, associate or other degree with curriculum deemed substantially equivalent by the licensing board;

 

(B)  If the Wyoming licensing board requires an examination for licensure, the substantially equivalent examination requirement may be met by passing the same or an earlier version of the exam.  The Wyoming licensing board shall waive this requirement if the individual has been licensed for more than ten (10) years;

 

(C)  In evaluating any work experience requirements the provisions of subsection (c) of this section shall apply;

 

(D)  In addition to any exam required under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph the Wyoming licensing board may require an examination relating to the specifics of Wyoming law and regulations regardless of the length of time the individual has been licensed.

 

(ii)  Demonstrates competency in the occupation or profession for which the applicant seeks licensure. Competency shall be determined pursuant to rules that shall be adopted for that purpose and may include consideration of continuing education credits, recent work experience, prior licensing examinations, disciplinary actions taken against the applicant in other states and other appropriate factors;

 

(iii)  Has not engaged in any act that would constitute grounds for refusal, suspension or revocation of the occupational or professional license sought in this state; and

 

(iv)  Has completed all required application procedures and paid any required fee.

 

(c)  All relevant work experience of an applicant, including fulltime or parttime experience, regardless of whether in a paid or volunteer capacity, may be credited in any work experience requirement adopted by an occupational or professional licensing board.

 

(d)  This section shall apply to all applications for licensure under W.S. 212802 or under title 33 of the Wyoming statutes except for the following:

 

(i)  An application to be an attorney at law under chapter 5 of title 33;

 

(ii)  An application to any board which represents a profession with prescriptive drug authority, but only with respect to the profession with the prescriptive drug authority.

 

(e)  Nothing in this section shall be held to limit the rights or privileges of a military service member under W.S. 331116.

 

Section 2.  W.S. 331117(b)(intro), (i), (e) and by creating a new subsection (g) is amended to read:

 

331117.  Temporary permits for military spouses.

 

(b)  A professional or occupational licensing board shall issue an expedited license to a military spouse to allow the military spouse to lawfully practice a profession or occupation requiring licensure in this state if the military spouse:

 

(i)  Holds a relevant, active occupational or professional license in good standing from another state; which state mandates substantially equivalent or more stringent educational, training, examination and experience requirements for licensure.  Substantial equivalency shall be determined pursuant to rules which shall be adopted by the licensing board from which the military spouse applicant seeks licensure;

 

(e)  Pursuant to rules which may be adopted for this purpose, a professional or occupational licensing board may issue a temporary practice permit to a military spouse applicant who meets the requirements of paragraph (b)(i) of this section and who has applied for a professional or occupational license under this section.  The military spouse applicant may practice under the temporary permit for a period not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) days three (3) years provided the military spouse is making progress toward satisfying the unmet licensure requirements, or until the professional or occupational license for which they have applied has been either granted or denied, whichever first occurs. A board shall not charge a military spouse any fees for a temporary permit under this subsection.

 

(g)  On each licensure application or renewal form, a professional or occupational licensing board shall inquire and maintain a record of whether an applicant is a member of the military or military spouse. If an applicant selfidentifies as and provides the board with satisfactory proof that the applicant is a military spouse, the board shall immediately commence the process of issuing a license  or temporary permit.

 

Section 3.  Professional and occupational licensing boards shall adopt rules necessary to implement this act.

 

Section 4.

 

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this act is effective July 1, 2021.

 

(b) Sections 3 and 4 of this act are effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.

 

(END)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Speaker of the House

 

 

President of the Senate

 

 

 

 

 

Governor

 

 

 

 

 

TIME APPROVED: _________

 

 

 

 

 

DATE APPROVED: _________

 

 

I hereby certify that this act originated in the Senate.

 

 

 

 

Chief Clerk


This bill seems to naively assume competence based on marriage.

Monday, February 8, 2021

February 8, 1971. The birth of NASDAQ and Operation Lam Son 715

On this day in 1971 NASDAQ began operating as the world's first electronic stock exchange.

On the same day, the Army of the Republic of Vietnam launched operation Lam Son 715.  The operation featured ARVN forces entering Laos, on their own, to take on North Vietnamese forces there.


The operation would not prove to be a success, demonstrating that deficiencies in the South Vietnamese military and security were such that it was incapable of such large scale operations on its own.  The North Vietnamese were able to anticipate South Vietnamese actions, due to loose security. Additionally, the South Vietnamese, contrary to their latter day reputation, were over aggressive in going into Laos and failed to appreciate the level of support that they routinely relied upon from the US military.


February 8, 1941. The passing of Willis Van Devanter.

 


Willis Van Devanter, the only Wyoming Supreme Court Justice (albeit only very briefly) to serve on the United States Supreme Court, died on this day in 1941.  He was living in Washington D. C. in retirement.

His early legal career is associated with Wyoming, and he had been a lawyer for the Wyoming Stock Growers Association during its more infamous period.  His time in Wyoming, however, during which he lived in Cheyenne, was brief.  It served him well, however, as he advanced rapidly in his career in part because this was something that could more readily occur in still frontier Wyoming.  Theodore Roosevelt appointed him to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals after he had served a stint as an attorney for the US, and Taft elevated him to the Supreme Court.  He'd been a judicial opponent of the New Deal.  He'd been retired for five years at the time of his death at age 80.

On the same day Bulgaria agreed to allow German troops to cross Bulgarian territory and German troops commenced their cross sea transit to Libya.

The British, on this day, incorporated Americans into their eves dropping activities at Bletchley Park.

More on what was going on in World War Two on this day:

Today in World War II History—February 8, 1941

February 8, 1921. Ford Grousers, Future Pinups, Former Intellectual Lights


 Secretary of War Newton Baker tested a fully tracked Ford coup.

The British sponsored Chamber of Princes, a deliberative body of Indian nobility, met for the first time.


Lana Turner, the legendary actress, was born in Idaho.  Prince Peter Kropotkin, sponsor of crackpot economic anarcho communist concepts, died disappointed in the Soviet Union, which he'd returned to once it went Communist, finding out that it was not what he was anticipating, mostly because what hew as anticipating was hopelessly naïve and stupid.

Peter Kropotkin, Russian prince and economic dipshit.

The Prince had spent years in exile only to return to find that decades of communist concepts lead to misery, repression and death.  Probably like most latter day apologies for the zillions of failed communist and socialist theories, he reconciled that it had never been tried, even if it had been.


In case you haven't noticed it, the Republican Party is struggling for its soul.

You are welcome to censure me again.  But let's be clear about why this is happening. It's because I still believe, as you used to, that politics isn't about the weird worship of one dude.

Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse.

And is an open question where it will go, or if it will become two parties.

Or, quite frankly just go right over a cliff and not survive at all, leaving a decade or more for a new conservative party, or parties, to be formed.  There's a pretty decent chance that might occur.

And it is also an open question of what this will all mean for Wyoming.

This is a true disaster in the making.  Make no mistake about it.

This past week Mitch McConnell, the de facto head of the the traditional Republican Party, came out in support of Liz Cheney, also a member of the traditional Republican Party, and against Marjorie Taylor Greene, a radical member of the Populist Trumpite Party that has been so influential in the GOP over the past four years.

Let's stop and consider this for a second.

Liz Cheney was under attack for one reason, and one reason only.  She'd voted to impeach Donald Trump, while he was still in office, as her conscience lead her to that.

Cheney is as conservative as they come.  Her voting record aligns more closely to Trump's positions than those of Florida pretty boy Matt Gaetz, whom normally Wyomingites wouldn't given the time of day.  None the less, Cheney has now been censured by about half of the Wyoming county organizations. and the state official GOP organization.  

That's right, the state's GOP has censured Cheney. There's a state legislator already running against her as a more conservative candidate than she, when it is literally impossible for anyone to be more conservative than she is, by any standard conventional definition of conservatism.

And Ben Sasse, who voted his conscience as well, and who wouldn't go along with the effort to disenfranchise voters that Ted Cruz lead as part of a self serving Ted Cruz effort to bolster his sinking political fortunes is up to be censured in Nebraska, "again".*

Sasse and Cheney continue to have the courage of their confictions. Sasse just gave the Nebraska GOP the middle finger salute, which they deserve, but in an articulate way.  Let's consider what he said once again.

You are welcome to censure me again.  But let's be clear about why this is happening. It's because I still believe, as you used to, that politics isn't about the weird worship of one dude.

Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse.

And you should really listen to his entire speech.

Cheney, for her part, refused to back down and chastised her party for believing in lies.  She even doubled down a bit on the bad acts of the President that resulted in her vote.  She not only has the courage of her convictions, but she's basically laid down the gauntlet to those who are accusing her of disloyalty.

Greene, for her part, is rapidly becoming the symbol of the alt right in some odd way.  Congress has a long history of marginalizing its members who aren't regarded as fit for office, but that's not what happened here.  Elected this past fall from Georgia, Greene has at least recently continued to wear "Stop the Steal" facemasks and is brazenly pro Trump in the conspiratorial sense.  Examination of her public comments shows that she has questioned the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon, and espoused a theory that Jewish space lasers started forest fires in California some years ago.

Let's stop to let that one sink in.

Giant Jewish space lasers.

Gee, with all the things Israel has to worry about it's starting forest fires in California rather than zapping Tehran. . . . 

In other words, Greene is a complete nut.

But that level of nuttery is what the GOP is contending with given the miles wide fissures that have developed in the party over the last few years.

And this also gives the GOP an opportunity, if it will take it.  Right now, it hasn't, and hasn't even come close to doing so.  Indeed, it all but retreated into one of the stupidest arguments that people ever make, that being the "well, I don't agree, but everyone has a right to speak", which is closely followed by "well, I don't agree, but the people of the district voted for her so. . . "

The people of Germany in 1932 voted for Adolph Hitler.  That argument is made for that.  If a person advocated for destroying a building, they'd be arrested.  We really don't have to simply shrug our shoulders, nor does Congress, over the really extreme.

As noted, an opportunity exists here, if it will be taken.  And its an opportunity the party in Wyoming is likely to sit out and end up on the wrong side of.

A vast danger exists here as well.

Whose in the tent?

We've gone over and over how this came about, and we're not going to do that again.  Instead, we're just going to write about where we right now.

The pillars of American conservatism, William F. Buckley and Ronald Reagan.

On one hand, you have the traditional Republican Party.  It's a center right conservative party that looks back to Ronald Reagan as its intellectual standard, and Reagan basically looked to William F. Buckley, the father of modern conservatism.  Buckley was a true intellectual and he defined American conservatism in a way it had never been before, and when it badly needed defining.  It's defined, or at least was, by  the following:

a.  It's politically conservative

b.  It's socially conservative

c.  It's very pro business.

d.  It's "small government" but it believes in the government.

e.  It's pro defense, and tends to be a bit interventionist overseas.

f.  It has a strong adherence to law and order and the rule of law.  It's not revolutionary, and it puts the constitution and the law ahead of its own goals.

Conservatism also, frankly, doesn't mind be a bit eliteist or at least it traditionally didn't.  Buckley and his acolytes hoped to see conservatives in power, but they were used to being out of power, and were accordingly used to the idea that they could serve being voices crying in the wilderness, albeit vocies that would be heard.  One biographer of Buckley noted that he'd grown up partially in England and as a sincere Catholic in England, he was by definition part of a "fighting faith", but a highly intelligent fighting faith.

Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich. Gingrich can really be viewed as the founder of what became the Tea Party.  He ran for President as recently as 2012.

Then you have the Trumpite populist wing of the party.

While he'd disavow it, the Trumpite wing of the party has its roots in the politics of Newt Gingrich, who lead an insurgent, take no prisoners, give no quarter, libertarian movement within the GOP during his time in the House from 1979 to 1999.***  He's notably from the same state that Green is from.  Indeed, but for a personal evolution, Gingrich might well have followed the role in a Trump White House that Buckley did in Reagan's, although by 2016 Gingrich had evolved considerably far away from the movement he'd started in the 1990s.

The Trumpite wing, or evolved Gingrich wing if you will, is much more difficult to define in part because its members fit a sliding scale and always have.  There are those who are actually more in the traditional party than the Trumpite wing, but have flown the Trump flag for convenience.  And indeed, there's a lot of cross over.  If we were to define it, however, it is defined by:

a.  It's strongly nationalistic, with its nationalism grounded in the founding demographic of the country.

b.  It's Protestant and "Christian Nationalist"

c.  It's libertarian in terms of economics, but not in anything else.

d.  It values cultural "values" of a conservative sort over the rule of law and adheres to the theory that they should be the law or implicitly are the law.

e.  It's isolationist.

f.  It's basically anti government and a proponent of "state's rights".

These two sets of views are sufficiently divergent that they really can't be housed in one body.  Part of the GOP's problem is that its tried to do so for almost 40s years.****  The traditional Republican Party is more like the Canadian and British Conservative parties.  The Trumpite party is more like a host of 20th Century European conservative parties.  The traditional Republican Party had managed to keep a lid on the populist Gingrich branch for decades, using it when it could, and suppressing it when it needed to.  Now, however, with the Trump presidency having dramatically impacted the GOP at its base roots, its unclear if it can do so, and this too is something that happened before, both inside the US and out of it.

As the past is indeed the prologue to the future, and as this is set to have dramatic impacts on the US without a doubt, we should look at this.

The Trumpite wing of the party

The Trump wing of the party strongly resembles a host of European political parties (and I'm including a Canadian political party in that definition) which valued ideology over democracy and let that define their approach to candidates.  In each instance, that lead to their downfall.

Now, let me note immediately, I'm not writing that those who are diehard Trump supporters are fascists.  I'm also not claiming that everyone who voted for Trump, is in the Trumpite wing of the party.  Indeed, I'm pretty sure that Cheney voted for Trump, even if Sasse didn't (which he has been open about).  This too, I'll note, is part of the history of these parties.  They were sometime successful on their own, but they often existed in environments in which they traveled with other conservative parties.  Indeed, in the U.S. system, which is a two party system, this tends to cause their to be more than one party inside of a party, as republican systems such as ours tend to default to two parties almost always, but that's always the weakness of such parties at the same time. They house multiple parties by default, most of the time.

Anyhow, what I am saying is that all of the aforementioned political parties operated or still operate in democratic environments in which they place certain political values ahead of democratic ones.  As they very strongly identify with their ideals, they essentially hold that in order for a political view to be legitimate, it had to comport to that ideal, and if it doesn't, it's illegitimate and doesn't count.

The country saw some of this in the recent insurrection.  Most of the people who were at the protest were likely simply those who believed that the election had been stolen, and therefore they were were trying to save the election. But running through that were t hose who believed that the election must have been stolen, as Trump didn't win.  Next to that were people who believe that Trump must have won, as votes for Biden were illegitimate by their nature, and don't count. And finally you have those who believe that there's a giant conspiracy afoot controlled by some pedophiles in the Democratic Party.  If you look at that, you essentially have the gamut of the German right wing parties in the 1920s, leading up to 1932, which we will deal with below.  

Al Smith, conservative, who would have recognized what Cheney did as comporting to his principles.

It really becomes apparent when you take this back to Wyoming look at the drama surrounding Liz Cheney's vote to impeach Donald Trump.  Her action is classic traditional Republican.  It put the rule of law above the party, and hence is admirable.  It's much like Al Smith's express rejection of votes that were on religious grounds in the 1930s, or Richard Nixon's concession of the election in 1960.  Cynthia Lummis' action doesn't really fit in here, as hers is pure political self interest, irrespective of her excuse.*****  An anti Trumper in 2016, she was seeing Ted Cruz as the Trump heir apparent in 2024, and was doing anything possible to kiss his ring and secure a position in a future Cruz administration.

Cruz for his part is probably actually really a traditional Republican, but he knows that he's going down in inevitable defeat in 2024 to Beto O'Roarke and he has to clear out while the getting is good. And therefore he's angling to kiss up to the Trump wing of the party as he figures it's strong, and that Trump is a fading figure. He planned on emerging as Trump's heir apparent for a 2024 run, figuring that by that time four years of panic over a future Kamala Harris administration, assuming that we're not already in a Kamala Harris administration by that time, will propel him to victory.  Of course, he pretty much shot his bolt on that and peaked a bit too soon, and in the wrong venue.  Indeed, Lummis nailed the coffin shut on her career as well, although she'll no doubt be able to keep on keeping on as Wyoming's Senator as we haven't booted one since Gale McGee's last run/non run.

Anyhow, looking locally, ten out of 23 counties have censured Cheney and now the state organization has as well.  Why? Well, she didn't vote "right" in their view, and that puts us back on the Trumpite populist scale.  She should have, in their view, voted against impeachment as that would be loyal to Trump, which means being loyal to their values, or more properly Weltanschauung,^ which puts the party's positions, or the Trumpite ones, ahead of democracy. Some of them are flat out okay with that, some haven't though it out, some believe the election was stolen, and some of them simply don' believe that any other action is legitimate for the reasons we set out above.  Their Weltanschauung is all defining in this context, trumps concerns about democracy in some, and defines the legitimacy or illegitimacy of opposing views.  Indeed, the intellectuals in the movement, and there are intellectuals in the movement, are quite open about this.

All of which means that this is a scary position for the country to be in, and a scary place for the GOP to be in, and which means that the GOP and the conservative movement may be headed for a train wreck.

A lesson from history.

We keep hearing that the United States has never been here before.  Actually it has to an extent.  Probably twice.

We didn't mention American political parties of the past in this tread up until now, but we will here at this point.

The first time we were here was from the mid 1830s through the mid 1860s. 

By the mid 1830s it was clear that a growing divide in the country over the issue of slavery was creating a rift that threatened civil war. After the US annexed Texas, that war became nearly inevitable.  Hardcore slavery proponents in the South couldn't reconcile the concept of a nation with slavery being limited.  That's important, it has to be noted, to realize.  It wasn't the threat of slavery being immediately limited that they regarded as irreconcilable with their beliefs, it was the limitation of its expansion.  Of course, everyone was savvy to the reality that limiting the expansion of slavery ultimately would mean its elimination. This came to a head with the election of Lincoln and the South took the country into civil war.

Before we move on from here, we have to first consider the pre Civil War in context.  Now the thought of slavery is so abhorrent that those who admire the Southern cause nearly always separate it from slavery if they can. But at the time, they did not.  The North and the South both had conservatives.  The South did not have what we'd call "liberals" in any numbers, however.  Some Southern conservatives sided with democracy and sided with the Union, if only in individual allegiance.  Some even had arrived at anti slavery positions before the war, which is essentially siding with democracy.  But most of the Southern political class couldn't bring itself to that point and was willing to lead the country into war over something that some deeply believed in. Others simply couldn't see past their own financial interest. Quite a few mixed the two with various degrees of acknowledgement of that.

Father Charles Coughlin in the 1930s.  In Coughlin's views, which were shared by many, we can see some of the same type of thinking we're also seeing today in some quarters, although certainly in a much different context.

It also happened again in the 1920s and 30s, with the rise of political extremism.  Both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party struggled with growing extremisms, much like they are right now.  On the right there were groups like that formed by Fr. Coughlin, on the left there were serious Socialists and Communist parties, and pretty significant heavy left infiltration into the Democratic Party.

Whitaker Chambers, who had been a Soviet spy in the 1930s after becoming a Communist in the 1920s, before having a profound conversion and leaving the Communist Party.

We know what happened in the first instance. The Civil War, followed by Reconstruction, followed by the betrayal of Reconstruction.  We can't say that the hard right, if you will, prevailed in the Democratic Party of the era, but we can say that a disaster truly occurred.  Long term, and it was long, the hard right of the Democratic Party collapsed, featuring two 20th Century attempts at forming a new southern Democratic Party, both of which quickly failed.

The Dixiecrats

Strom Thurmond, who was so opposed to desegregation in the 1940s that he ran for President in a party dedicated. Thurmond, it might be noted, was openly opposed to integration, but not so much that he avoided African Americans altogether.  He fathered a child by a black long term household employee in 1925, who was still working for him in 1948.

Not without being disruptive, however. Strom Thurmond, seeing integration coming on strong, ran as a Dixiecrat (States Right Democratic Party) in the 1948 election, taking the electoral votes of four states.  Truman swept the nation that year, so it didn't matter. So what was the net result?

Well, the Dixiecrats failed to achieve anything and its members ended up rejoining the Democratic Party. They weren't completely done, so to speak, but they were frankly much diminished.  A Democratic candidate had won in 1948 in spite of them and they had proven to not really matter much, at least in 48, to the party.  Integration of the military went ahead in the 1940s and 50s, and it entered civil society in the early 1950s.  The Democratic Party itself, moreover, started to ignore its conservative wing.

Which wasn't enough for it to make one last try.

The American Independent Party

In 1968 George Wallace, running for the far right American Independent Party, took five southern states in an election that otherwise saw Richard Nixon elected to office.  He was basically a Dixiecrat.


Wallace was regarded as an actual potential prospect in 68, but that proved to be very much in error.  He returned to the Democratic Party, survived an assassination attempt, and changed his mind on segregation prior to his death.  For a lot of people today, he's only known as the mysterious reference in Lynard Skynard's Sweet Home Alabama as the Governor who gets the boos.  The party itself ran another hard righter in 1972's Presidential election, but ultimately split into two.  It still exist as a near non entity except oddly in California, for an odd reason.  It pretty much just nominates candidates from other parties now, who are already running, such as its 2016 nomination of Donald Trump.  In 2020 it nominated the gadfly ticket of Rocky De La Fuente and Kanye West.^^

Oh, California?  

Well those who have studied it suspect that those who register as part of it in California actually mean to note that they are Independents, not actual members of the party.

Both Wallace and Thurmond were really Democrats, but conservative Democrats deeply dedicated to segregation. Both got over it towards the end of their careers, but that's not the point. The point is that the Democrats had an extremely strong conservative element from 1865 until 1968, and it really only had a liberal branch starting in 1912.  The liberal branch had a companion center left/right branch, yielding to a center left branch alone in the 2000s.

That hard right fringe, which is what it was, is completely dead in the Democratic Party.  Dead.  And both of these insurgent Democratic bodies are, well, irrelevant now.

The lesson?  Well, in Birmingham they may love the Governor, but choosing positions that weren't viable with the country at large and whose day was done may have won votes temporarily in the South, but in the long run it killed conservatism in the Democratic Party.

The application?  Well, taking hard right positions of the type we're seeing right now which place party above the democratic process may win accolades from inside the party room right now, but outside, it's pretty cold and this may alter the GOP forever without a populist wing.

So let's look at the other movements and see if that's just an American fluke.

The Union Nationale

Long serving, and two time, Premier of Quebec, Maurice Duplessis.

Quebec's government was run by the Union Nationale from the mid 1930s, when it was first formed, until the late 1950s.  

In that time, Quebec was similar in some ways (and very much not in others) to some of the regions where the Trump wing of the GOP is popular today.  It was heavily rural, at least in so far as the French speaking population was concerned, with islands, if you will, of big cities.  And it had a culture that was distinct from the WASPish culture that ran Canada.  It was, in that fashion, sort of like Wyoming, in that it had a rural population that felt oppressed, different and besieged by the national culture, whether it was to the extent it imagined or not.

The party, lead by Maurice Duplessis, was extremely conservative and extremely French nationalistic.  It pursued a form of isolationism within Canada from the rest of Canada itself.  It's economic policy, at the time, might be regarded as agrarian distributism.  Like a lot of the Trumpite wing of the GOP, it was Christian Nationalist, but not in a protestant fashion, but a Catholic one.



The Union isn't a wholly unadmirable party by any means.  It did a good job of guiding Quebec through the Great Depression, which brought it to power.  But it was nearly an anachronism at the time it was formed, something that Trumpites should take counsel from.

The Union was French Quebecois to the core and rightly realized that the Quebecois had preserved their identity due to their religion more than anything else. Following the French defeat in the Seven Years War the Quebecois were allowed to retain their religion, and the church had realized that the only way that the Quebecois were going to survive was through a type of self isolation.  The Quebecois largely eschewed commerce and industry, as well as governance, and kept to themselves as a separate French speaking, Catholic, body in an overwhelmingly English speaking, Protestant, North America.  The Church kept the Quebecois in existence.

But following the Boer War the English Empire was rapidly changing.  The UK itself recognized that the days of old fashioned colonialism were drawing to a close and sought more and more to develop what had been an empire into a family of English speaking sister states, with England as their mother.  In this world, Canada was drawing more and more into being fully and culturally separate from the United Kingdom, although it would take World War One and World War Two to really make that true.

As Canada's politics developed into their own, the Union Nationale stepped into the culture of the province that had defined its path, and with a vengeance.  The party was singularly nationalistic in a Quebecois fashion.  Realizing the history of the Church in preserving the provinces identity, it operated more and more to try to institutionalize that history into a quasi governmental role, much like Fianna Fáil did in Ireland following Irish independence.  As with the Irish example, the party operated to see that education and social services were nearly wholly run by the Church, which at first accepted that role due to it traditionally occupying it.

The party lost power in Quebec during World War Two which in part reflected that it had developed fascist sympathies by the late 1930s.  It returned to power following the war, but by then Canada was rapidly evolving into its modern self.  By the 1950s the Church was begging the Union Nationale to take over the normal social roles that were occupied by the government in other Canadian provinces, but the Union refused to accept the reality that the Church saw coming.  Instead it ran its old policies into the ground and by the late 1950s it was subject to what amounted to a political revolution with a cultural reaction, much as the same started happening in Ireland in the 2010s and which is still occurring.  In both instances, interestingly enough, the institutions that it sought to keep in a traditional role sought to be relieved of it, being more savvy to the the nature of a modern state than the party.

To conclude the party's fate, the party was essentially defined by and lashed to the identity of Duplessis himself. He died in 1959 and his immediate successor, seeing the tidal wave coming, attempted to initiate a "100 days of change", but died before that was over.  His successor called an election, and the liberals won. The Quiet Revolution, and all the ills it brought, and it did bring ills, came about. Reform came, but all at once and in a disastrous way.  

Much of that blame can be laid right at the feet of the Union Nationale.  It should have seen what was coming as early as 1945/46, and it should have listed to one of the organizations it was attempting to boost, the Church.  It didn't.  

The party dissolved in 1989. There are a couple of parties that claim it as their intellectual ancestor, but they amount to nothing.

The lesson here?  The party stood for something, and something real, early in its history, but even then was backwards looking, something it failed to appreciate because of the economic situation Quebec was in.  It was unable to adjust, at all, to the sweeping changes that came into Canada as soon as World War Two ended and went down in defeat, forever, for its failure to adjust to them.  In a lot of ways, if you insert the story of the "Tea Party" or "Alt Right" wing of Wyoming's GOP in here, it reads much the same.  If so, it's probably in the 1955-56 period on the Union Nationale timeline.

The Union Nationale still has parties that assert its heritage.  They have no real role in Quebec politics today.  Looked at that way, the hard Trump wing of the GOP, or at least Wyoming's, should consider where the Union Nationale was in 1950. . . and then in 1960. . .and now.

Let's look at another French example.

The Revolution Nationale


"Work, the Country, Family".  The personal standard of Marshall Petain, but one which was adopted informally for the Vichy regime itself.

The Revolution Nationale was a movement, not a party, but none the less its instructive as Trumpism is a movement, not yet a party.

The Rrevolution Nationale was the movement put together by the defeated French right wing following France's surrender to the Germans in 1940.  Contrary to the way its sometimes imagined, the French government didn't cease to exist in 1940 in any fashion. It's surrender was legally legitimate, and for that reason members of the "Free French" forces were de facto rebels.  The Free French themselves reflected a variety of backgrounds, De Gaulle was a monarchist, but the French left went largly out of office when France surrendered and into opposition, if not into outright exile.

Phillippe Petain in 1941.

Vichy, while remaining a legitimate government, knew its limitations and it accordingly turned in on itself, with Phillippe Petain, the hero of World War One at its head.  Petain was, as is well known, a great hero of World War One.  As a career military man, he could be expected to hold the views of the military class, in regard to politics, but he doesn't actually seem to have.  Somehow, however, he acquired these with the fall of France.

French politics were extremely odd up until recently, and a bit difficult to follow, with factions that arose in the French Revolution continually fighting it out over the decades.  As part of this, at some point the French officer class began to contain a significant number of traditionalist monarchists, something that is foreign to the US, but which is instructive in what we're going through now. Emphasizing French tradition over liberal reform, the French monarchist saw the figure of the monarch as the standard bearer of conservatism.  Its truly odd in that the last really fully legitimate French monarch was on the thrown last arguably in 1792, or maybe in 1848. . . or maybe in 1870, but no monarch had been on the thrown of any kind since 1870, which was a long time before 1940.  None the less, monarchist remained and a lot of them were in the Army.

How the Revolution Nationale conceived of itself in comparison with the pre war regime.

They weren't solely in the Army by any means, and over time a line of hard right monarchist philosophy came about due to such thinkers as Charles Maurras, founder of Action Frances. They identified themselves with all things traditionally French and based in their thinking on the concepts in Integralism.  Integralism held that all things had to be oriented towards the Church, but in their application of this they went far beyond these principals and into a sort of unique French traditional cultural orientation.

Once in power, Petain gravitated towards this view and it became the ethos of the government.  It had, quite frankly, the virtue of standing both for and against something simultaneously.  It remained distinctly French in this fashion until the second half of the German occupation of France during which time the Germans came to more and more dominate Vichy and Vichy slid into collaboration, and hence less French, but its politicians still striving to retain their highly conservative and insular views.  Originally conceiving of it self as a means of protecting the real France against what it regarded as threats to France, including the French left, it ultimately decayed into simply collaborating with the Germans in France as a practical matter.

Poster depicting France as imagined by the Revolution Nationale.

Vichy of course fell with the Allied landings in 1944.  What's significant here, however, in this story is this.  The French right, including the traditionalist right, had been a factor in French politics since the early 1800s.  But with the cooperation with the Germans, the traditionalist right's bolt was shot.  There would be other right wing French politicians, and there still are, but the legacy of Vichy has so tainted the traditionalist right wing that the French right wing has simply had to accommodate itself to the permanent influence of the left, even when its out of power.

Now, this lesion would be easy to dismiss, but the key fact may be this.  Accommodating to the seeming lesson of the immediate age deprived the French traditionalist right of a role in its future.  France that came out of World War Two had no place for it even when those who were really basically sympathetic to it, including Charles DeGaulle, were in power.

Let's turn sought from France for a second and look at a similar example, that of Spain

The Spanish Falangist

Falangist ideology is misunderstood in the US and always has been.  It wasn't represented by one political party, but two.  And it isn't fascism, at least in the abstract.  And, moreover, it never ruled Spain.  Furthermore, in some ways the party was uniquely Spanish

Falangism had its roots in the collapse of the Spanish monarchy, which was a long time in coming.  The movement itself was diverse and included everyone from true fascist to dedicated monarchist.  By and large, if taken in broadly, and if its individual branches aren't examined, what it stood for was syndicalism as an economic theory, something that has never been popular in the United States, monarchism, and traditionalism.  While one branch of the party was decidedly fascist, and therefore anti religion, another part was decidedly Catholic, and as time went on, while the two coexisted, they never completely reconciled. This later feature was emphasized by the forced union of all of the Falangist parties with the Carlist parties under the Franco regime.  Carlist were a distinctly traditionalist and nationalist movement that was dedicated to monarchy.  

Looked at this way, Falangism had some themes that were very similar to the Revolution Nationale, after the forced 1934 merger.  The movement had a dedicated inward looking economic view that was opposed to Communism and Capitalism, it sought to vest great power in the state, it was highly traditional and Christian Nationalist, and it came to be focused on one man, Francisco Franco.

Franco, of course, came to power either rescuing Spain or destroying it, depending upon your view of things. Which every it was, he remained in power until his death in 1975.  Franco was never a member of the Falange, but he did rely on it and it was accordingly heavily associated with him.

Franco, always enigmatic, saw his own end and the end of the state he created coming on with his death.  Before that time came, he restored the Spanish monarch and the current king of Spain actually briefly ruled the country following his death.  But with Franco, the Falange pretty much died as well.  In the 1930s it was the single most significant political movement in Spain.  Now, while Falange parties remain, they're non entities.

The lesson here?  Well, perhaps not much of one because the state of Spanish democracy was such a mess in the 1930s its hard to really see a Spain that didn't collapse into civil war.  But if there is one, it's this. The Falange wasn't a believer in democracy.  When democracy came back to Spain, it died.  Vested ultimately in, as Ben Sasse would say, om the "weird" dedication to "one dude", it didn't survive the dude.

Let's go a bit to the west, Portugal

The National Union

Here's another movement that has a now familiar sounding name and, as will be scene for those not familiar with it, now familiar sounding politics. The Portuguese National Union.

The National Union came to power with António de Oliveira Salazar, the strongman who ruled Portugal for a blistering 36 years..

Portuguese generals following the coup of May 26, 2926.

Salazar was an economist who was brought into the Portuguese government in 1926 when the Portuguese Army, distributed by Portuguese political instability, stage a coup on May 28 of that year.  Most sections of Portuguese society, except for the left, supported the coup.  While the generals felt that they had saved the nation from disorder, they proved unable to run the economy, and brought Salazar in as the finance minister. 

Salazar was successful in addressing the Portuguese deficit and by 1932 he was running the country as its Prime Minister.  His policies were somewhat like those already mentioned for Vichy France, but nowhere near as extreme.  Perhaps for this reason, his rule lasted an incredibly long time.  He was, in essence, a moderate authoritarian.

Which provides, perhaps, the lesson.

Salazar.

Salazar was a conservative, anti democratic, and yet dignified man.  He likely would have found the Trumpite wing of the Republican Party deeply repellant for a variety of reasons, and indeed he was opposed to political parties in general.  He was a deeply religious Catholic himself, but he did not seek to unify Christianity with the nation, regarding politics as separate from faith.  HIs regime studiously observed religious tolerance and he made every effort to separate the government from religion.  He believed that his death would end the National Union, but it didn't immediately.

But it did end, and when it did, it went down in the Carnation Revolution of 1974, a left wing, military coup by young officers in the Portuguese military.

For a time, it was feared that Portugal would become a Communist state.  It did not. Today its current government is a coalition government of Socialist, conservative Christian Democrats, and monarchist, an unlikely coalition if ever there was one.  The country none the less features some significant left wing parties.  They aren't governing, however.

So the lesson here is that Portugal's anti democratic highly conservative movement also, interestingly enough, eschewed extremism.  It remains in power longer than any other autocratic governments, and its figurehead was not charismatic.  When it fell, it fell peacefully, and more or less into moderation.

The German Conservative Right.

The German right wing political pars of the Weimar period give us an other example, although an interesting one in context. They actually were evolving in the opposite direction in some instances, although not enough to save them.

German National Peoples' Party poster from the 1920s.  I think this is supposed to show a Teutonic night, the symbol of Germany, trapped between a Communist and a Pole, but I'm not really sure.  It's creepy, that's for sure.

The big right wing political party in Germany between the wars and before the Nazis was the German National People's Party.  It wasn't the only right wing German party by any means, however.  All  of the far right "conservative" parties were an odd mixture of highly nationalistic, monarchist and militaristic ideologies, including the NDV.  Some of the really nasty ideologies that would fully bloom in Nazism were present in the NDV before the Nazis amounted to much.

The NDV, however, oddly evolved in a different direction.  Never a huge fan of democracy, they became more democratic as time went on. It actually began to fall apart when some of its leadership admitted in 1928 that campaigning to restore the monarchy was pointless as it wasn't going to happen and younger Germans didn't support it.  That set the party up for real problems as German politics became increasingly extreme after October 1929 and radicalized far right Germans gravitated towards the Nazi Party, just as radicalized left wing members of the SDP increasingly joined the German Communist Party.  As right wing radicals struggled to drag the party back to the right, moderates bolted and formed the Conservative People's Party, a center right party.  

Every German political party came basically to an end with the Nazis coming to power in 1932, although not immediately, and the NDV, to its lasting shame, participated in brining the Nazis to power.  Some NDV figures participated in the early Nazi government, and as with all German political parties some simply went over to the Nazis. The Nazi government ultimately suppressed the NDV on the grounds that it had been infiltrated by Communists.  However, some surviving members of the party were part of the July 20, 1944 plot, which makes a great deal of sense as the goals of those plotters were less purely democratic than they were in the nature of conservative anti Nazism.

After the war the NDV never revived. The Christian Democratic Union, untainted by the Nazis and their rise in any fashion, simply supplanted them. The CDU, however, was not really a conservative party but a center right party.  And that's the lesson here.  The NDV's inability early on to place democracy above its own interests made it an inherently anti democratic party whose reform came to late, as it participated in the damage to German society and its democracy that gave rise to the Nazis.  When Germany returned to democracy after the war, the anti democratic role of the NDV was too much of a legacy for the German right to overcome.  It simply disappeared. The fact that the majority of the German populace was no less interested in democracy than the members of the NDV didn't matter.  It's day was done, just as in democratic West Germany, the day of the KDP was done as well.

A British Example

Let's throw in a British example, from something along the lines of the last time this happened in an English speaking country.

Let's look at Oliver Cromwell.

Oliver Cromwell.

Cromwell started off as a parliamentarian, and in that role he was a central figure in the English Civil War.

The English Civil War was, obviously, quite a while back and it figures into the long mess of the English trying to sort out the disaster of the Reformation and the accompanying Elizabethan Religious Settlement, which was no settlement at all, but rather a compromise that allowed Elizabeth to reign without things being decided and, at least by some accounts, without her actual belief in it.^^^ Be that as it may, during the reign of King Charles I, the question of the rights of kings, a long running dispute in English history, arose which pitted the highly Anglican King Charles against he Parliament.

Parliamentary forces fell to the control of Cromwell, who proved to be an able general.  He was also a devout Puritan, which is to say a devoted follower of Calvin, and he believed the Church of England to be tainted, in his view, with Catholicism.

Cromwell's military prowess lead him to victory and on to the position of English dictator as the "Lord Protector". That lead him to be hated.  He was even posthumously executed, with his body desecrated, and his head being kept in a secret location to this day, least the desecration repeat.  His actions lead to the execution of King Charles I, but his reign lead to the restoration of the Crown under King Charles II, who for all his faults converted to the faith Cromwell feared the most, Catholicism, prior to his death.

The lesson? Well Cromwell was a purist fanatic.  His fanaticism lead him to power and it lead many people to their death, including King Charles I.  In effect, Cromwell, in his view, "stopped the steal", but his government then went about telling everyone what to think and what to do, and not to do, in accordance with the leader's beliefs. It lead the English to hate him in his own day, and the Irish to hate him forever.  Puritanism fell from grace and they ended up fleeing to Holland and the English colonies in North America. Not a real record of success.

So what to make of all of this?

What indeed.

Well, perhaps quite a lot.

Right now the Republican Party, a party that did not have its origin in extreme conservatism and which originally sought to overthrow at least one item in the existing social order, and which has both flirted with liberalism and been the standard bearer of conservatism, has seen a large part of its based infused by populism.  Some of those populist were Democratic populist at one time, an element of the Democratic Party that was once strong.  Additionally, in some regions of the country the GOP is the only party, the way that conservative Democrats were once the only party in the South.

A longer strain of history in the party, the traditional Republican Party, has seemed to lose control of the situation and right now there's a civil war in the party about what sort of party it is going to be.  Long history suggest the traditionalist will will out, but right now there's good reason to believe that won't occur.  Maybe the Trump wing will persevere and dominate.  Maybe the party will spit into two.

And here's the concern.  The country needs a conservative party, and as basic conservatives, we'd like to see a real conservative party exist. But the direction the Trump wing of the party is taking it won't succeed long term, and might not succeed short term, even if it contains real elements of conservatism that should be in a conservative party.  The history of all such movements in western society has been disastrous, not only to themselves, but to the movements they espoused, and often to conservatism in the larger sense.

Ben Sasse has warned about the an allegiance to "one dude".  His warning is well placed. Beyond that, an allegiance to the movement over the democratic process has a really bad history.  It tends to lead to the extinguishment of such movements themselves, no matter what the merits of their aims may be.

Put another way, by censuring Sasse and Cheney, real conservatives, they're essentially and ironically censuring themselves in the pages of history, and probably to their ultimate political extinction, and that which they stand for.  They need to step back and consider what they're doing, but in the heat of the moment, that hardly ever occurs.

__________________________________________________________________________________

*People should be making no mistake about Cruz.  Cruz was already going to go down in defeat if he ran again for the Senate in 2024.  He has his eyes on the White House, but he has to.  He has nowhere else to go and is going to be out of a job in 2024.

Cruz was supporting the Trumpites as he hoped they'd draw his wagon into the White House.  Cruz was serving Cruz in recent events, and he likely sank his political career permanently as a result.

**Of note, those in the administration who were openly religious nearly uniformly were protestants, with perhaps the exception of Kelly Anne Conway, who is a Catholic.  Mike Pence was a fallen away Catholic who had become an evangelical Christian, something that's extremely significant in regards to a person's religious views if their serious about it.  Mike Pompeo went overseas to Italy while in office and noted his Italian roots, but he's also a protestant which, in the case of ethnicities such as Irish Americans and Italian Americans frankly disqualifies a person from claiming that status.

***Gingrich has moderated considerably with age and his views on various things have changed.  He's acknowledged a lot of fault in his prior life of all types.

****The Democrats have the same problem, however, in that the moderates in the party and the left wing radicals really can't be housed in the same party either.

*****Lummis, who regarded Trump with distain in 2016, endorsed him heartily in 2020.  While perhaps her conversion was sincere, it has the appearance of somebody calculating their political fortune and making a guess that Wyoming was Trumpite, and Cruz was Trumpite, and Cruz was headed to the White House, therefore she'd have a position in a Cruz White House. That calculation was almost certainly wrong and will likely permanently marginalize her political future.

^Weltanschauung is a German word for "World Outlook", but the term conveys more than that and is difficult to translate into English.

^^Events such as what is going on inside the GOP must be madding to members of parties like the Indepedant Party or the Constitution Party, which have long been hard right.  They must wonder where all those people were all those years.

^^^While it may be apocryphal, by some accounts she refused the attention of priests of the Church of England upon her death, calling them "false priests", and thereby tacitly acknowleding the position of her sister Mary.

How you can tell when your country has way too many lawyers.


A new suit contends King’s Hawaiian is misleading consumers about where its rolls are made.

Oh who cares? They're yummy.

Clearly a place for the application of the doctrine of de minimis non curat lex.


Sunday, February 7, 2021

February 7, 1921. Refugees in Turkey, National Boy Scout Week, Army shrinks, Navy grows.

 Russian refugees on beach at Proti Island near Constantinople

It was the beginning of National Boy Scout Week.  In Sheridan Wyoming the Boy Scouts decorated the downtown windows on this Monday in honor of the week.

An issue of Boys' Life, the Scouting journal, from 1921, depicting a  Boy Scout and a Sea Scout.

Congress, earlier in 1920, had voted to reduce the size of the U.S. Army to 175,000 men.  President Wilson vetoed the measure.  Congress overrode the veto, and it became effective on this day in 1921 so the Army would accordingly shrink.

The Navy, however, gained a new ship, the USS Selfridge, a Clemson class destroyer that would serve a mere nine years.

USS Selfridge.

Hands off, bub.

One additional follow-up to this item: 
Lex Anteinternet: Weld County, Wyoming? No thanks.: The degree to which boosters completely fail to think out the things that they boost is one of the stories that repeats itself continually t...

The Governor of Colorado responded with a hands off. 

As well he should have. This is an absurd idea.

Sunday Morning Scene: Churches of the East: Catholic Church, Paris France

Churches of the East: Catholic Church, Paris France:

Catholic Church, Paris France


The Best Post for the Week of January 31, 2021

 The best posts for the week of January 31, 2021.

Sunday Morning Scene: Churches of the East: The ruins of of Saint Albain Nazaire, France.