which is the subject of a television ad in which a portly late middle-aged gentleman, representing himself to be a rancher, comes on and is besides himself about how the bill is being considered. He urges people to contact their "conservative" senators to vote against it, as its going to aid China.
Ag bill?
Here's the actual bill, with striked text included.
S. 2992
To provide that certain discriminatory conduct by covered platforms shall be unlawful, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESOctober 18, 2021Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Graham, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Booker, Ms. Lummis, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Warner, Mr. Hawley, and Mr. Daines) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
March 2, 2022Reported by Mr. Durbin, with an amendment
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
A BILLTo provide that certain discriminatory conduct by covered platforms shall be unlawful, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
(a) Violation.—It shall be unlawful for a person operating a covered platform, in or affecting commerce, if it is shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the person has engaged in conduct that would—
(1) unfairly preference the covered platform operator’s own products, services, or lines of business over those of another business user on the covered platform in a manner that would materially harm competition on the covered platform;
(2) unfairly limit the ability of another business user’s products, services, or lines of business to compete on the covered platform relative to the covered platform operator’s own products, services, or lines of business in a manner that would materially harm competition on the covered platform; or
(3) discriminate in the application or enforcement of the covered platform’s terms of service among similarly situated business users in a manner that may materially harm competition on the covered platform.
(b) Unlawful Conduct.—It shall be unlawful for a person operating a covered platform, in or affecting commerce, if it is shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the person has engaged in conduct that would—
(1) materially restrict or impede the capacity of a business user to access or interoperate with the same platform, operating system, hardware or software features that are available to the covered platform operator’s own products, services, or lines of business that compete or would compete with products or services offered by business users on the covered platform;
(2) condition access to the covered platform or preferred status or placement on the covered platform on the purchase or use of other products or services offered by the covered platform operator that are not part of or intrinsic to the covered platform itself;
(3) use non-public data that are obtained from or generated on the covered platform by the activities of a business user or by the interaction of a covered platform user with the products or services of a business user to offer, or support the offering of, the covered platform operator’s own products or services that compete or would compete with products or services offered by business users on the covered platform;
(4) materially restrict or impede a business user from accessing data generated on the covered platform by the activities of the business user, or through an interaction of a covered platform user with the business user’s products or services, such as by establishing contractual or technical restrictions that prevent the portability of the business user's data by the business user to other systems or applications;
(5) unless necessary for the security or functioning of the covered platform, materially restrict or impede covered platform users from un-installing software applications that have been preinstalled on the covered platform or changing default settings that direct or steer covered platform users to products or services offered by the covered platform operator;
(6) in connection with any covered platform user interface, including search or ranking functionality offered by the covered platform, treat the covered platform operator’s own products, services, or lines of business more favorably relative to those of another business user than they would be treated under standards mandating the neutral, fair, and non-discriminatory treatment of all business users; or
(7) retaliate against any business user or covered platform user that raises concerns with any law enforcement authority about actual or potential violations of State or Federal law.
(c) Rule Of Construction.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall not be construed to require a covered platform operator to divulge, license, or otherwise grant the use of the covered platform operator’s intellectual property, trade or business secrets, or other confidential proprietary business processes to a business user.
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) shall not apply if the defendant establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the conduct described in subsections (a) was narrowly tailored, was nonpretextual, and was necessary to—
(A) prevent a violation of, or comply with, Federal or State law;
(B) protect safety, user privacy, the security of non-public data, or the security of the covered platform; or
(C) maintain or enhance the core functionality of the covered platform.
(2) UNLAWFUL CONDUCT.—Subsection (b) shall not apply if the defendant establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the conduct described in subsection (b)—
(A) has not resulted in and would not result in material harm to the competitive process by restricting or impeding legitimate activity by business users; or
(B) was narrowly tailored, could not be achieved through less discriminatory means, was nonpretextual, and was necessary to—
(i) prevent a violation of, or comply with, Federal or State law;
(ii) protect safety, user privacy, the security of non-public data, or the security of the covered platform; or
(iii) maintain or enhance the core functionality of the covered platform.
(e) Covered Platform Designation.—The Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice may jointly, with concurrence of the other, designate a covered platform for the purpose of implementing and enforcing this Act. Such designation shall—
(1) be based on a finding that the criteria set forth in clauses (i) through (iii) of subsection (h)(4) are met;
(2) be issued in writing and published in the Federal Register; and
(3) apply for 7 years from its issuance regardless of whether there is a change in control or ownership over the covered platform unless the Commission or the Department of Justice removes the designation under subsection (f).
(f) Removal Of Covered Platform Designation.—The Commission or the Department of Justice shall—
(1) consider whether its designation of a covered platform under subsection (e) should be removed prior to the expiration of the 7-year period if the covered platform operator files a request with the Commission or the Department of Justice, which shows that the online platform no longer meets the criteria set forth in clauses (i) through (iii) of subsection (h)(4);
(2) determine whether to grant a request submitted under paragraph 1 not later than 120 days after the date of the filing of such request; and
(3) obtain the concurrence of the Commission or the Department of Justice, as appropriate, before granting a request submitted under paragraph (1).
(g) Remedies.—The remedies provided in this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedy available under Federal or State law.
(1) CIVIL PENALTY.—Any person who is found to have violated subsections (a) or (b) shall be liable to the United States or the Commission for a civil penalty, which shall accrue to the United States Treasury, in an amount not more than 15 percent of the total United States revenue of the person for the period of time the violation occurred.
(2) INJUNCTIONS.—The Assistant Attorney General of the Antitrust Division, the Commission, or the attorney general of any State may seek, and the court may order, relief in equity as necessary to prevent, restrain, or prohibit violations of this Act.
(3) REPEAT OFFENDERS.—If the fact finder determines that a person has engaged in a pattern or practice of violating this Act, the court shall consider requiring, and may order, that the Chief Executive Officer, and any other corporate officer as appropriate to deter violations of this Act, forfeit to the United States Treasury any compensation received by that person during the 12 months preceding or following the filing of a complaint for an alleged violation of this Act.
(h) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) ANTITRUST LAWS.—The term “antitrust laws” has the meaning given the term in subsection (a) of section 1 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12).
(2) BUSINESS USER.—The term “Business User” means a person that utilizes or is likely to utilize the covered platform for the sale or provision of products or services, including such persons that are operating a covered platform or are controlled by a covered platform operator.
(3) COMMISSION.—The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission.
(4) COVERED PLATFORM.—The term “covered platform” means an online platform—
(A) that has been designated as a covered platform under section 2(e); or
(i) at any point during the 12 months preceding a designation under section 2(e) or at any point during the 12 months preceding the filing of a complaint for an alleged violation of this Act—
(I) has at least 50,000,000 United States-based monthly active users on the online platform; or
(II) has at least 100,000 United States-based monthly active business users on the online platform;
(ii) at any point during the 2 years preceding a designation under section 2(e) or at any point during the 2 years preceding the filing of a complaint for an alleged violation of this Act, is owned or controlled by a person with United States net annual sales or a market capitalization greater than $550,000,000,000, adjusted for inflation on the basis of the Consumer Price Index; and
(iii) is a critical trading partner for the sale or provision of any product or service offered on or directly related to the online platform.
(5) CRITICAL TRADING PARTNER.—The term “critical trading partner” means a person that has the ability to restrict or materially impede the access of—
(A) a business user to its users or customers; or
(B) a business user to a tool or service that it needs to effectively serve its users or customers.
(6) PERSON.—The term “person” has the meaning given the term in subsection (a) of section 1 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12).
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall adopt rules in accordance with section 553 of title 5, United States Code, to define the term “data” for the purpose of implementing and enforcing this Act.
(B) DATA.—The term “data” shall include information that is collected by or provided to a covered platform or business user that is linked, or reasonably linkable, to a specific—
(i) user or customer of the covered platform; or
(ii) user or customer of a business user.
(8) ONLINE PLATFORM.—The term “online platform” means a website, online or mobile application, operating system, digital assistant, or online service that—
(A) enables a user to generate content that can be viewed by other users on the platform or to interact with other content on the platform;
(B) facilitates the offering, sale, purchase, payment, or shipping of products or services, including software applications, between and among consumers or businesses not controlled by the platform operator; or
(C) enables user searches or queries that access or display a large volume of information.
(9) CONTROL.—The term “control” with respect to a person means—
(A) holding 25 percent or more of the stock of the person;
(B) having the right to 25 percent or more of the profits of the person;
(C) having the right to 25 percent or more of the assets of the person, in the event of the person’s dissolution;
(D) if the person is a corporation, having the power to designate 25 percent or more of the directors of the person;
(E) if the person is a trust, having the power to designate 25 percent or more of the trustees; or
(F) otherwise exercises substantial control over the person.
(10) STATE.—The term “State” means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this Act—
(A) the Commission shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act;
(B) the Attorney General shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers and duties as though all applicable terms of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.), and Antitrust Civil Process Act (15 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act; and
(C) any attorney general of a State shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers and duties as though all applicable terms of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) and the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.
(2) UNFAIR METHODS OF COMPETITION.—A violation of this Act shall also constitute an unfair method of competition under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45).
(3) COMMISSION INDEPENDENT LITIGATION AUTHORITY.—If the Commission has reason to believe that a person violated this Act, the Commission may commence a civil action, in its own name by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to recover a civil penalty and seek other appropriate relief in a district court of the United States.
(4) PARENS PATRIAE.—Any attorney general of a State may bring a civil action in the name of such State for a violation of this Act as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in such State, in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the defendant, and may secure any form of relief provided for in this section.
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission, Assistant Attorney General of the Antitrust Division, or any attorney general of a State may seek a temporary injunction requiring the covered platform operator to take or stop taking any action for not more than 120 days and the court may grant such relief if the Commission, the United States, or the attorney general of a State proves—
(A) there is a claim that a covered platform operator took an action that would violate this Act; and
(B) that action impairs the ability of business users to compete with the covered platform operator.
(2) EMERGENCY RELIEF.—The emergency relief shall not last more than 120 days from the filing of the complaint.
(3) TERMINATION.—The court shall terminate the emergency relief at any time that the covered platform operator proves that the Commission, the United States, or the attorney general of the State seeking relief under this section has not taken reasonable steps to investigate whether a violation has occurred.
(4) OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF.—Nothing in this subsection prevents or limits the Commission, the United States, or any attorney general of any State from seeking other equitable relief as provided in subsection (g) of this section.
(a) In General.—Any party that is subject to a covered platform designation under section 2(e) of this Act, a decision in response to a request to remove a covered platform designation under section 2(f) of this Act, a final order issued in any district court of the United States under this Act, or a final order of the Commission issued in an administrative adjudicative proceeding under this Act may within 30 days of the issuance of such designation, decision, or order, petition for review of such designation, decision, or order in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
(b) Treatment Of Findings.—In a proceeding for judicial review of a covered platform designation under section 2(e) of this Act, a decision in response to a request to remove a covered platform designation under section 2(f) of this Act, or a final order of the Commission issued in an administrative adjudicative proceeding under this Act, the findings of the Commission or the Assistant Attorney General as to the facts, if supported by evidence, shall be conclusive.
SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES.
(a) In General.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission and the Assistant Attorney General of the Antitrust Division shall jointly issue guidelines outlining policies and practices, relating to agency enforcement of this Act, including policies for determining the appropriate amount of a civil penalty to be sought under section 2(g)(1) of this Act, with the goal of promoting transparency, deterring violations, and imposing sanctions proportionate to the gravity of individual violations.
(b) Updates.—The Commission and the Assistant Attorney General of the Antitrust Division shall update the joint guidelines issued under subsection (a), as needed to reflect current agency policies and practices, but not less frequently than once every 4 years beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, whether user conduct would constitute a violation of section 1030 of title 18 of the United States Code is not dispositive of whether the defendant has established an affirmative defense under this Act.
(b) An action taken by a covered platform operator that is reasonably tailored to protect the rights of third parties under sections 106, 1101, 1201, or 1401 of title 17 of the United States Code or rights actionable under sections 32 or 43 of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1114, 1125), or corollary state law, shall not be considered unlawful conduct under subsection 2(a) or (b) of this Act.
(c) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit any authority of the Attorney General or the Commission under the antitrust laws, the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45), or any other provision of law or to limit the application of any law.
If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and of the amendments made by this Act, and the application of the remaining provisions of this Act and amendments to any person or circumstance shall not be affected.
This Act may be cited as the “American Innovation and Choice Online Act”.
(a) In General.—In this Act:
(1) ANTITRUST LAWS; PERSON.—The terms “antitrust laws” and “person” have the meanings given the terms in subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12).
(2) BUSINESS USER.—The term “business user”—
(4) CONTROL.—The term “control” means, with respect to a person—
(C) in the event of the dissolution of the person, having the right to 25 percent or more of the assets of the person;
(5) COVERED PLATFORM.—The term “covered platform” means an online platform that—
(B) is owned or controlled by a person that—
(ii) (I) at any point during the 12 months preceding a designation under section 3(d) or the 12 months preceding the filing of a complaint for an alleged violation of this Act has at least—
(II) during—
(aa) the 2 years preceding a designation under section 3(d), or the 2 years preceding the filing of a complaint for an alleged violation of this Act—
(AA)at any point, is owned or controlled by a person with United States net annual sales of greater than $550,000,000,000, adjusted for inflation on the basis of the Consumer Price Index; or
(BB) during any 180-day period during the 2-year period, an average market capitalization greater than $550,000,000,000, adjusted for inflation on the basis of the Consumer Price Index or
(C) is owned or controlled by a person that—
(ii) (I) at any point during the 12 months preceding a designation under section 3(d), or the 12 months preceding the filing of a complaint for an alleged violation of this Act has at least—
(II) at any point—
(aa) during the 2 years preceding a designation under section 3(d), or the 2 years preceding the filing of a complaint for an alleged violation of this Act, is owned or controlled by a person with earnings, before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, in the previous fiscal year of greater than $30,000,000,000, adjusted for inflation on the basis of the Consumer Price Index; or
(6) CRITICAL TRADING PARTNER.—The term “critical trading partner” means a person that has the ability to restrict or materially impede the access of—
(7) DATA.—The term “data” includes information that is collected by or provided to a covered platform or business user that is linked, or reasonably linkable, to a specific—
(8)FOREIGN ADVERSARY.—The term “foreign adversary” has the meaning given the term in section 8(c) of the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1607(c)).
(9)ONLINE PLATFORM.—The term “online platform” means a website, online or mobile application, operating system, digital assistant, or online service that—
(A) enables a user to generate content that can be viewed by other users on the platform or to interact with other content on the platform;
(b) Regulations.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall promulgate regulations in accordance with section 553 of title 5, United States Code, to define the term data for the purpose of implementing and enforcing this Act.
(a) In General.—It shall be unlawful for a person operating a covered platform in or affecting commerce to engage in conduct, as demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence, that would—
(1) preference the products, services, or lines of business of the covered platform operator over those of another business user on the covered platform in a manner that would materially harm competition;
(2) limit the ability of the products, services, or lines of business of another business user to compete on the covered platform relative to the products, services, or lines of business of the covered platform operator in a manner that would materially harm competition;
(3) discriminate in the application or enforcement of the terms of service of the covered platform among similarly situated business users in a manner that would materially harm competition;
(4) materially restrict, impede, or unreasonably delay the capacity of a business user to access or interoperate with the same platform, operating system, or hardware or software features that are available to the products, services, or lines of business of the covered platform operator that compete or would compete with products or services offered by business users on the covered platform;
(5) condition access to the covered platform or preferred status or placement on the covered platform on the purchase or use of other products or services offered by the covered platform operator that are not part of or intrinsic to the covered platform;
(6) use nonpublic data that are obtained from or generated on the covered platform by the activities of a business user or by the interaction of a covered platform user with the products or services of a business user to offer, or support the offering of, the products or services of the covered platform operator that compete or would compete with products or services offered by business users on the covered platform;
(7) materially restrict or impede a business user from accessing data generated on the covered platform by the activities of the business user, or through an interaction of a covered platform user with the products or services of the business user, such as by establishing contractual or technical restrictions that prevent the portability by the business user to other systems or applications of the data of the business user;
(8) materially restrict or impede covered platform users from uninstalling software applications that have been preinstalled on the covered platform or changing default settings that direct or steer covered platform users to products or services offered by the covered platform operator, unless necessary—
(9) in connection with any covered platform user interface, including search or ranking functionality offered by the covered platform, treat the products, services, or lines of business of the covered platform operator more favorably relative to those of another business user than under standards mandating the neutral, fair, and nondiscriminatory treatment of all business users; or
(b) Affirmative Defenses.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall be an affirmative defense to an action under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) if the defendant establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the conduct was narrowly tailored, nonpretextual, and reasonably necessary to—
(2) OTHER UNLAWFUL CONDUCT.—It shall be an affirmative defense to an action under paragraph (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), or (10) of subsection (a) if the defendant establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the conduct—
(c) Enforcement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this Act—
(A) the Commission shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act;
(B) the Attorney General shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.), and Antitrust Civil Process Act (15 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act; and
(C) any attorney general of a State shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) and the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.
(2) COMMISSION INDEPENDENT LITIGATION AUTHORITY.—If the Commission has reason to believe that a person violated this Act, the Commission may commence a civil action, in its own name by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to recover a civil penalty and seek other appropriate relief in a district court of the United States.
(3) PARENS PATRIAE.—Any attorney general of a State may bring a civil action in the name of such State for a violation of this Act as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in such State, in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the defendant for any form of relief provided for in this section.
(4) ENFORCEMENT IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT.—The Commission, Attorney General, or any attorney general of a State shall only be able to enforce this Act through a civil action brought before a district court of the United States.
(5) REMEDIES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The remedies provided in this paragraph are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedy available under Federal or State law.
(B) CIVIL PENALTY.—Any person who violates this Act shall be liable to the United States or the Commission for a civil penalty, which shall accrue to the United States Treasury, in an amount not greater than 15 percent of the total United States revenue of the person for the period of time the violation occurred.
(C) INJUNCTIONS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, the Commission, or the attorney general of any State may seek, and the court may order, relief in equity as necessary to prevent, restrain, or prohibit violations of this Act.
(ii) TEMPORARY INJUNCTIONS.—
(I) IN GENERAL.—The Commission, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, or any attorney general of a State may seek a temporary injunction requiring the covered platform operator to take or stop taking any action for not more than 120 days.
(II) GRANT.—The court may grant a temporary injunction under this clause if the Commission, the United States, or the attorney general of a State, as applicable, proves—
(aa) there is a plausible claim, supported by evidence, that a covered platform operator took an action that would violate this Act;
(III) DURATION.—A temporary injunction under this clause shall expire not later than the date that is 120 days after the date on which a complaint under this subsection is filed.
(IV) TERMINATION.—The court shall terminate a temporary injunction under this clause if the covered platform operator proves that—
(D) FORFEITURE FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS.—If a person has engaged in a pattern or practice of violating this Act, the court shall consider requiring, and may order, that the chief executive officer, and any other corporate officer as appropriate to deter violations of this Act, forfeit to the United States Treasury any compensation received by that person during the 12 months preceding or following the filing of a complaint for an alleged violation of this Act.
(6) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—A proceeding for a violation of this section may be commenced not later than 6 years after such violation occurs.
(7) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in subsection (a) may be construed—
(i) to require a covered platform operator to divulge or license any intellectual property, including any trade secrets, business secrets, or other confidential proprietary business processes, owned by or licensed to the covered platform operator;
(ii) to prevent a covered platform operator from asserting its preexisting rights under intellectual property law to prevent the unauthorized use of any intellectual property owned by or duly licensed to the covered platform operator;
(iii) to require a covered platform operator to interoperate or share data with persons or business users that are on any list maintained by the Federal Government by which entities—
(iv) to prohibit a covered platform operator from promptly requesting and obtaining the consent of a covered platform user prior to providing access to the nonpublic, personally identifiable information of the user to a covered platform user under that subsection;
(v) in a manner that would likely result in data on the covered platform or data from another business user being transferred to the Government of the People's Republic of China or the government of another foreign adversary; or
(B) COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK VIOLATIONS.—An action taken by a covered platform operator that is reasonably tailored to protect the rights of third parties under section 106, 1101, 1201, or 1401 of title 17, United States Code, or rights actionable under section 32 or 43 of the Act entitled “An Act to provide for the registration and protection of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, and for other purposes”, approved July 5, 1946 (commonly known as the “Lanham Act” or the “Trademark Act of 1946”) (15 U.S.C. 1114, 1125), or corollary State law, shall not be considered unlawful conduct under subsection (a).
(d) Covered Platform Designation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission and Department of Justice may jointly, with concurrence of the other, designate an online platform as a covered platform for the purpose of implementing and enforcing this Act, which shall—
(2) REMOVAL OF COVERED PLATFORM DESIGNATION.—The Commission or the Department of Justice shall—
(A) consider whether a designation of a covered platform under paragraph (1) should be removed prior to the expiration of the 7-year period if the covered platform operator files a request with the Commission or the Department of Justice that shows that the online platform no longer meets the criteria set forth in subparagraphs (B) and (C);
(3) JUDICIAL REVIEW.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Any person aggrieved by a designation under paragraph (1), a decision in response to a request under paragraph (2), or a final order issued in any district court of the United States under this Act may, within 30 days of the issuance of such designation, decision, or order, petition for review of such designation, decision, or order in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES.
(a) In General.—Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission and the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, in consultation with other relevant Federal agencies and State attorneys general, shall jointly issue agency enforcement guidelines outlining policies and practices relating to conduct that may materially harm competition under section 3(a), agency interpretations of the affirmative defenses under section 3(b), and policies for determining the appropriate amount of a civil penalty to be sought under section 3(c), with the goal of promoting transparency, deterring violations, fostering innovation and procompetitive conduct, and imposing sanctions proportionate to the gravity of individual violations.
(b) Updates.—The Commission and the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division shall update the joint guidelines issued under subsection (a) as needed to reflect current agency policies and practices, but not less frequently than once every 4 years beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(c) Public Notice And Comment.—Before issuing guidelines, or updates to those guidelines, under this section, the Commission and the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division shall—
Nothing in this Act may be construed to limit—
(1) any authority of the Attorney General or the Commission under the antitrust laws, section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45), or any other provision of law; or
If any provision of this Act, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, and the application of the remaining provisions of this Act, to any person or circumstance, shall not be affected.
(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
