Lex Anteinternet: Why?

Wednesday, December 21, 2022

Why?

Why does the Wyoming Secretary of State need its own state paid and funded attorney?

Is the AG's office too busy to take care of this?

Does this mean that the Secretary of State, who does stuff that deals with the law, doesn't know the law because, well, he's not a lawyer?

The one chosen has only been practicing law for a year, but is also the nephew of Harriet Hageman.

My prediction is that in Wyoming, that's not going to matter at all.

And why did the Wyoming Supreme Court not take up the abortion ban question, sending it back to the district court? I know that it said; "This court does not believe it can answer all twelve certified questions on the limited factual record provided", but seriously, it's just interpreting an amendment to the state constitution.

No comments:

Lex Anteinternet?

This blog has been around since 2009. In the very first post, we asked the question: "What the heck is this blog about?"

Our answer to the question was: "The intent of this blog is to try to explore and learn a few things about the practice of law prior to the current era. That is, prior to the internet, prior to easy roads, and the like. How did it work, how regional was it, how did lawyers perceive their roles, and how were they perceived?"

We also noted: "Part of the reason for this, quite frankly, has something to do with minor research for a very slow moving book."

All of this is still true, but the focus of the blog has changed somewhat. It now focuses on the era from 1890 to 1920 in general, rather than on the law and lawyers specifically, although that may be far from obvious. It's also become the location where we comment on anything we feel moved to comment on.

We hope you'll feel moved to comment as well. While we moderate every comment, so as to weed out Spam, we greatly appreciate the comments where they are offered, and hope to see more.

Thank you for stopping in!