More on the Wyoming economy. . . which is sitting there just to the right of the photo.
I just posted on Wyoming's economy, in the context of the election, here:
Issues In the Wyoming Election. A Series. Issue No. 1. The Economy
In that I borrowed Harriet Hageman's stool analogy, which all other other candidates essentially use in one form or another, and then went on to place the economy in context, I hope, in terms of the election.
In doing that one thing that I think perhaps came through is that while all of the candidates talk about the economy, they all tend to do so on a superficial level, or even on an unrealistic level. That was made pretty plain in the Trib's interview of David Dodson, Republican Senatorial candidate, who essentially thinks that simply being a salesman for the state would cure our economic ills.
Not so much.
Here we look at one of the "stool legs". More will follow but as the first leg of the stool I mentioned is so often cited, it's worth taking a closer look at.
The extractive industries.
To listen to every major candidate except for Democrat Throne you'd get the idea that (Republican controlled) Washington D. C. has the extractive industries in chains and that this is keeping the industry down.
This is a bit surreal for a variety of reasons
And as noted before, I've covered that before, which I'll set out, in part, here again in a long winded way (but for a reason):
Let's look at how I summarized this stool leg earlier. Here's what we wrote:The Wyoming Economy. Looking at it in a different way.
The extractive industries
Early Wyoming oilfield.
The Carissa Mine, South Pass Wyoming
And so how did I sees that in the context of the economic future and building a more stable Wyoming economy? Here's what I had to say on that:
So where do we go?
Okay, at this point I'll admit that all I seem to be doing is repeated myself. As I'm repeating myself.
But everything I wrote there I think still holds up.
Indeed, I think recent evidence shows that my analysis in this are was fully correct. The petroleum industry has partially rebounded, indeed significantly own, all on its own due to market forces and not anything else. The coal industry has reestablished a new normal at a lower production level, again all its own, but it's clear that long term power industry fuel trends paint a bleak future for it of slow decline. As we've also noted, that decline has been going on for a century. There is an anti regulation President in the White House and regulations, I'm told have been very much curtailed. In spite of all of this Wyoming's candidates keep talking of "cutting regulations" under the theory that this will, at this point, do something. It's been done.
What is also the case, as I've described before, is that the industry has now changed technologically and at the exploration end, and maybe even downstream, it will require fewer employees per unit than before. Our local politicians also seem to miss that. Everyone is also missing the fact that petroleum consumption, but not gas consumption, is on a long term decline nationally as a new generation of Americans have seemingly lost the American love affair with the car.
The long and the short of it is that, in terms of production, there's not much the state can do.
Would this mean that the state can't do anything about jobs associated with the petroleum industry.
Well. . . .it probably can, but I doubt that it would want to.
Wyoming lost jobs on the exploration side during the recent downturn. But before that, it lost jobs on the manufacturing side back in the late 70s and early 80s. That's when our refining industry started to slide. And its never come back.
As an example, up into the late 1970s Casper had three refineries. It now has one. If we look back to the mid 20th Century a lot of towns and cities in Wyoming had refineries that no longer exist. Laramie, for example, had a refinery, now just a rusting hulk south of town. Thousands of jobs existed in those facilities.
Since that time, we've acquired a lot of gas plants, as gas has to be processed locally. Petroleum does not, however, and throughout the United States refineries in the interior have been closed as giant refineries on the Gulf Coast replaced them.
This is the one area in the petroleum industry where local jobs could be created. .. but the industry isn't going to take that step. I.e., if new refineries were built in Wyoming, and plants that processed petroleum into various products such as plastic, there would in fact be thousands of local jobs created.
That isn't going to happen, and in fact the opposite is going to happen. Long term, the industry wants Gulf Coast refineries for a variety of reasons. And those reasons make sense for the industry.
But, and this is a radical thought, the state could do it.
But it won't.
You are familiar, of course, with Dakota Mills and South Dakota Cement. Indeed, you read about them here.
I'll be coming back to them again.
Anyhow, it would be possible, but it won't occur, for the state to play a direct role here by building one or two refineries in the state, perhaps one in the Pinedale region and another around Douglas.
But this won't happen.
It would be massively expensive, to be sure. And that would draw the ire of people like Representative Chuck Gray who would be horrified by the expense.
And expensive it would indeed be.
But, frankly, so are the "clean coal" efforts, and we seem comfortable enough with that.
And such an effort, if on the South Dakota Cement or Dakota Mills model, could probably at least break even, and would likely have a ripple effect on the economy. It would, bare minimum, employ hundreds and creates hundreds of more jobs, using a raw product that we produce here locally and then send out of the state for processing.
Which is not too say that this has a ghost of a chance of occurring, or that its uniformly a good idea.
It certainly would be problematic for a host of reasons. For one thing, it would put the state into an industry that is associated with massively expensive environmental problems. Indeed, one of those Casper refineries, the one that basically built the town, was subject to just such a clean up. It's now the Three Crowns Golf Course. No way the state would want to be tied up in something like that.
For another, it would put the state directly into competition with private industry, which is problematic for obvious reasons (although apparently not if you are North or South Dakota).
And it's politically unrealistic in this industry.
Which brings us to something less unrealistic, which is not to say realistic. The state could encourage the building of such infrastructure locally. . . with the only really realistic way to do that through taxation.
Now, any time taxation is mentioned in Wyoming people have a fit. Heck, we barely passed the coal severance tax that funded our schools for years. But we could do that. One purpose of taxation is to direct spending and development, in addition to raising revenue.
This would be hard to do, but you could put in place a Raw Products Tax to attempt to encourage local infrastructure in this are. But you'd have to be careful doing it so as to not end up deterring production, and that would be tricky.
And that's not going to happen either.
So, what's the point?
Well, just this. In the major healthy extractive industry, oil and gas production, there's actually next to nothing that the Governor or our Congressional representation can do to impact it positively or negatively. It's all pricing. And that price isn't determined here. Habits of consumption aren't either.
So the only opportunity is in the end product end.
But nobody is talking about that, and nobody is going to either.
So this gets back to this. If this is an area of our economy that we largely can't do anything to influence, other than those things which have already been done, why do we keep kicking it around as though there's a political issue here to be discussed. The economics of the extractive industries are economic realities that can only be influenced around the margins. We can impact those margins to greater or lesser degrees through policies or direct actions, but big actions in this area would require big, and radical, efforts that we're not about to undertake.
So, dare we say, perhaps the topic of Wyoming's economic situation ought to just flat out skip over this area.
Addendum
Some times this morning, well after I posted this, I received an email from candidate Mark Gordon that sort of freakishly relates to the topics here. It reads:
Other things go back o regulations although not in a way that's stated radically.
Anyhow, I'm not opining on the outline above in any fashion, just keeping this newly posted post, somewhat contemporary with the campaign.
Addendum
Some times this morning, well after I posted this, I received an email from candidate Mark Gordon that sort of freakishly relates to the topics here. It reads:
Wyoming’s energy industry has long been the backbone of our economy and has served our state, people, communities, businesses, and schools tremendously well. As the industry and markets change, so must our approach to protecting and promoting our natural resources!My new Power WYO Forward platform will foster and grow our state’s energy sector.The 6-point plan is simple:A person can take this for what it is worth, of course. The thing I think is interesting about it is that it obviously advocates for the use of state funds in regards to the oil industry. An irony of this is that the use of state money for private enterprise is generally not supposed to be a Republican thing, but apparently here it is. Another factor to be considered, or that perhaps should be, is that some of the targets for state money under this type of program would seem to be areas that, if they are viable, the largest sector of our economy would invest in itself.
- Building Infrastructure to Export Wyoming Resources - I’ll pursue opportunities with other sovereign funds, including the Alaska Permanent Fund and the Alberta Investment Management Corporation, to explore building infrastructure to export Wyoming’s high-quality minerals. Investing in private-sector endeavors or supporting them with bonds to do just that is a win-win.
- Driving Advanced Energy Technologies - I’ll work to position Wyoming as the leader in advanced energy technologies including Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) and new carbon-to-product markets. We’re seeing promising research come out every day that shows the potential for turning carbon into marketable products we can make money off of – like petrochemicals, asphalt and plastics.
- Streamlining Regulations - I’ll drive a shift on the state and federal level towards regulations that reward people for doing a better job – be it through expedited permitting, faster response times, or other incentives. The free market can, and will, address many of the environmental concerns that come with energy production, but we have to give them reasonable room to do so.
- Localizing Decision Making – Working with Federal Agencies - Wyoming people, Wyoming leaders need to be empowered to make decisions. It is critical for the next Governor to leverage action with a strong relationship with the BLM and other federal agencies to expedite processes and keep projects moving.
- Streamlining & Aligning State Energy Resources - Streamlining and better aligning Wyoming’s energy agencies and resources will not only better serve taxpayers, but business – energy producers, innovators and those adding value to the chain. I’m committed to ensuring the state does more with less to direct people and companies to the resources Wyoming already has in place.
- All of the Above Energy Policy – There is Room for It All - Be it oil, gas, coal, uranium or wind, when it comes to natural resources, Wyoming has it all. As a lifelong conservative, I strongly believe that the market should pick winners and losers when it comes to energy sources – not government.
Other things go back o regulations although not in a way that's stated radically.
Anyhow, I'm not opining on the outline above in any fashion, just keeping this newly posted post, somewhat contemporary with the campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment