Unlike some historitans, I think the answer is obvious, and I've touched on it before in our thread Lex Anteinternet: The Mexican Revolution. As the anniversary of the event came upon me at a time when work and activities kept me from posting a really new entry here on the episode, I'm linking in, over the course of the week, a variety of items, but this particular item addressed some of these topics. So I'm basing this post on what I earlier wrote. Perhaps that's bad form, but none the less I think the earlier entry was pretty good.
I'm not going to repeat all that was there, but let's note that Mexico had slid into revolution, and the US had already intervened in Mexico during that revolution. Mexico's long standing dictator Porfirio Diaz had fallen in revolution. In turn, Modero, who overthrew him in the name of liberal democracy, had ruled naively and had gone down in a 1913 military coup that brought Victoriano Huerta to power. Unfortunately, that coup had the local support of the American ambassador to Mexico, Henry Lane Wilson. Mexico erupted into civil war. That civil war brought the radical Venustiano Carranza into power and soon remaining Mexican revolutionaries took sides with or against him as Mexico descended into chaos. One of the revolutionary generals opposing Carranza was Pancho Villa with his Army of the North.
We pick up the story after the U.S. first intervened military at Vera Cruz to keep arms being supplied to Huerta.
Indicative of things to come, perhaps, Huerta was defeated and fled while the United States occupied Vera Cruz, but he was no more pleased about the American presence there than a disgruntled Huerta was, who went on to plot with German agents to bring Mexico into war with the United States, as noted. American forces withdrew in November 1914, but they'd be back, as we'll see, in a different location only shortly thereafter. The intervention at Vera Cruz, however, did prevent the Germans from supplying a shipment of arms to Huerta, which may or may not have had an impact on the Mexican Revolution. Ironically, the arms were actually American made as the Germans, in 1914, were not in a position to export arms to Mexico.Carranza soon found himself fighting the two main stars of the Mexican Revolution, Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata. Zapata, while he receives less attention, is by far the most interesting of the two as he had a real political vision for Mexico, that being a distributist agrarian state. Villa was more of a peasant free agent, with less defined goals. Suffice it to say, however, both had been highly successful revolutionaries and a betting man would have bet against Carranza at that point.However, Carranza was a radical as well, and that position allowed him to undercut support for a war weary Mexican population in the south. This began to undercut support for the agrarian Zapata, and he began to face supply problems and accordingly set backs in the field. Nonetheless Zapata was still in the field in 1919 when he was lured into a trap in an effort to secure supplies and assassinated. In the north, Pancho Villa, who had been a very successful natural cavalry commander, found himself unable to adapt to the changes in battlefield tactics that were also being used in Europe. Constantly in battle against Carranzaista commander Alvaro Obregon, who used barbed wire and trenches, his fortunes rapidly declined.Alvaro Obregon, whose competence and study of military tactics lead to the defeat of Pancho Villa and his Division del Norte. He'd ultimately become present of Mexico following his coup against Carranza. Obregon would serve one term as president of Mexico, and was elected to a second term to follow his successor Calles, but he was assassinated prior to taking office.But before they did, Carranza, in spite of a dislike of the United States, approached the Wilson administration about transporting troops through Texas by rail to be used against Villa. Wilson had been horrified by H L. Wilson's actions in bringing about Madero's downfall, and he deeply desired to see an end to the fighting in Mexico. Deciding to recognize Carranza as the legitimate ruler of the country, he granted permission for this to be done in 1915. Traveling under arms, they were used against Villa. Villa retaliated against the United States for its entering the conflict in this fashion by raiding Columbus New Mexico on March 9, 1916.
The raid on Columbus has seemingly baffled American historians ever since, but the reasons for it couldn't be more apparent. Villa was a fairly simply man, not a diplomat, and he had been attacked by Carranza's forces after they'd crossed the United States by rail. By doing that, the US had taken a position in the war, which indeed it had whether President Wilson recognized that or not. Indeed, Wilson had been warned by those knowledgeable not to support Carranza, who deeply disliked the US, and when it wasn't clear who was going to win the civil war. Wilson's actions did nothing to engender love from Carranza but it did inspire Villa to retaliate against the US.
And so started an episode that would take U.S. troops deep into Mexico.
This entire episode seems oddly contemporary and from a distant less powerful past for the Americans. It's hard to imagine ourselves being raided in this fashion, but then perhaps the events of 9/11 were not entirely dissimilar. And the entire event serves as a cautionary tale today. Nobody would have foreseen a newspaper interview bringing down Diaz. Nobody would have seen Modero becoming the president of Mexico. Nobody would have anticipated a victorious Modero leaving the Mexican army and its officer corps in place following their defeat. Wilson, for his part, apparently didn't appreciate that he was directly intervening in a Mexican civil war by allowing Mexican troops in that war to be transported across U.S. territory. Things have a way of working out contrary to our expectations.
No comments:
Post a Comment