Wednesday, August 1, 2018

Issues In the Wyoming Election. A Series. Issue No. 1 (e). The Economy again. . . what if we really don't want it to change?

 
God Bless Wyoming and keep it wild.

Helen Mettler*
Every single politician in the current race, no matter what position they are running for, is emphasizing the economy. At the larger level (local races really have a different focus on this point) the candidates all talk about diversifying the economy, save for Harriet Hageman.  Hageman seems to think the old reliance on oil and gas is just fine and everything should be left alone economically, only more so.  Hageman's close compatriot in views, Taylor Haynes, emphasizes education.  Bill Dahlin points out that education is great, but it doesn't matter much if there's no jobs to go to, and while he's against the ENDOW program (so is Haynes, and I'd guess Hageman likely is), he's for industrial hemp.**

Galeotos has a broad technology based vision that apparently particularly comes out if he's speaking to smaller groups.  I'm not sure what Gordon's view is, but he's for diversification.  Friess, like Galeotos, sees technology as the savior of the state's economy for the future and, in the recent debate, compared what technology can do for Wyoming to what air conditioning did for the South.

And that's where I think most Wyomingites, or at least most native Wyomingites, begin to recoil in horror.

Secretly, most Wyomingites don't share any of these visions, I suspect.  People both appreciate and fear the oil and gas industry. They appreciate it if it brings work to them, and almost everyone depends on it. But they don't like being flooded with Texan's and Oklahoman's when the industry is really hot.  They won't openly admit it much, but in small groups, when they are speaking to their friends, they often will.  Indeed, I've heard people who endured the boom of the 1970s speak wistfully of the crash that followed, even if they suffered economically due to it.  Heck, I was one of those people and while the crash completely altered my career path and changed where I was headed, before decisions of my own following up on that did the same to an even greater degree, I was basically one of those people.  Yup, no work. . . but nobody hanging out at my fishing holes either.

Indeed to be born in Wyoming and to stay here has always entailed a degree of voluntary suffering.  We've always grasped that we were exchanging wealth for a more local, wild, life. And we've been fine with that.  We don't begrudge the young that leave, if they come back, but we do actually, even if only secretly begrudge those who left while very young only to return when old. You left, we figure, and made your money elsewhere. . . so you should stay there.  

We don't begrudge those who moved in to work while in their working years, particularly if they're from the region, but its different if megabucks personalities who made their money in the outside economy and then bought a Stetson, or even worse a ranch, with that money later on.  Or who bought a house in Teton County with their out of state mega bucks.

This view is even stronger regarding people who made huge piles of money outside the state and then come in and throw their weight around or who just get in the way of locals.  And that's a problem that candidates like Friess and Dodson face.  It's not so much that they are outsiders who moved here and made money, as it is that they are outsiders who made money elsewhere and the used the money to move here and get in the way at our favorite spots, while telling us how the state can get rich.

So when people like Hageman speak of taking over the Federal lands and how that will open up ever stopcock in the oil patch, we fear what she's saying for a variety of reasons. We fear and detest it as we don't want the Federal lands taken over and then sold by the state.  And we fear it as we don't necessarily want a giant oil boom.  Steady work, if you please. . . .

Likewise, the thought that technology will do for us what air condition did for the South is a horrific thought.  We don't want any Houston's here. 

Maybe we just like things more or less exactly as they are.  A mostly agricultural landscape with a really small population.

__________________________________________________________________________________

*Mettler's wild comment is frequently quoted and has been featured on posters, but people rarely know much about her. She was a 15 year old tourist in 1926 when she wrote the quote and, additionally, when she died in Teton County in a hiking/climbing accident when the ground she was on suddenly gave away and she fell into Taggert Canyon.  She was the daughter of Helen Mettler (nee Fleischmann) and John Wyckoff Mettler.  The family was one of successful businessmen and he was the president of the Interwoven Stocking Company and she was of the Fleischmann yeast family.  Both companies still exist. The family was vacationing in Wyoming at the time of Helen's death.

 Mettler as a very young girl

The quote apparently appears in Helen's diary and is attributed to 1925.  Her death came the following fall and I frankly have some suspicion that the diary entry is actually from 1926. 

Her diary entry expresses a common view in Wyoming and features on a popular poster that can frequently be found in the state.  Her early death somehow makes it more poignant and doesn't take away from the sentiment at all.  The fact that she was a New Yorker and not a Wyomingite, and so young, somehow emphasizes her point.

**The GOP candidates, or at least the second tier ones, have a lot of interesting inconsistent messages.  Dahlin is all for developing new industries but won't acknowledge that the lack of infrastructure hinders that.  Haynes is all for education but Dahlin is correct that great education with no jobs means that you simply export people. . . this is a really common feature of the economies of all of the Plains states.  Hageman's view on the economy seems to be stuck in about 1960.  Even the first tier candidates can be confusing on all of this. Galeotos is apparently impressive in small groups but panders to Trump loyalist in an illogical fashion in his wider campaign, or at least he was until the news on Trump matters began to sound more everyday like a plot from The Americans.  Gordon has some interesting direct emails but he is a blisteringly poor speaker and can't get those across in an address.  At least based on my very limited exposure to her, Throne is a remarkably poor speaker as well.

A look at Wyoming's economic history and government spending

Today's Tribune has an article by Samuel Western on the history of government spending in Wyoming, entitled:

Western: Big government has been a staple of the Wyoming economy since territorial time

It's a really interesting read.

I'll note that this is a compliment coming from me in that I have sort of a visceral reaction to Sam Western in the first place, and not in a positive way.  I frankly regard him in the category of annoying carpetbagger full of unwanted advice.

That's harsh and may be completely unwarranted, but as a Wyoming native, sooner or later you'll feel that way about something.  We tend to be constantly enduring East Coasters who have no connection to the state moving in and offering advice on how to convert the state into the blight they just fled, or temporary residents who moved into from the country's other oil provinces who are full of opinions on how the state is just like wherever they left or should be.  I don't know that Western, whom I put in the first category, deserve that feeling on my part but I tend to feel that way about him in part because of his book Pushed Off The Mountain Sold Down The River, which I admittedly have not read but which my mother was a fanatic fan of.

Western has a lot of opinions about Wyoming's economy and has managed to go from being a writer as The Economist to being regarded as as local author. I don't regard him as a local author so much as I regard him as somebody whose means or remote occupation allowed him to relocate to someplace else, which isn't like being from the region, or anywhere else for that matter, and relocating due to work.  So, suffice it to say, I'm predisposed to disregard Western.

Be that as it may, his Tribune article points out what Wyomingites simply hate to acknowledge, which is that we're a big government state and always have been.  This goes all the way back to the state's beginning, and at first, because our politics were significantly different than they are now, we were quite comfortable with that.  He might not quite grasp the reasons for that, or perhaps he's unaware of the history of it, but Wyoming was a Republican state early on, just like it is now, but in an era when the GOP was the liberal party.  While the state's typically been too cheap to fund much of what it tries to create, early on the state was "progressive" in the original sense of the word when the Democrats were conservatives who looked back to the ante bellum era to a large degree.

Western's point, I think, is that this impacts the state today, which it does.  But one thing I think he misses, somewhat, is the degree to which that history simply isn't grasped, even though it leaves a large legacy, and the extent to which some current residents claim an imagined historical and political heritage that's actually quite contrary to the actual one.  In our current election year, for example, candidates like Hageman, Haynes or Barrasso who argue for turning land over to the state government are really taking a position that's contrary to the actual Wyoming one, at least historically, in terms of its view.  Or put another way, they're sort of on what would have been regarded as the loosing side of history for much of Wyoming's history, on that sort of thing.

August 1, 1918. Mustering the Home Guard


The size of World War One is perhaps demonstrated in part by the fact that, like World War Two, the militia was expanded to include bodies in each state that replaced the Federalized National Guard.*

Normally these units are called State Guards, and they've existed in every state in modern times only during World War One and World War Two, although some states have retained State Guard separately from from somewhat before the war until the present time and a few have established them once again in modern times.  Most states don't have them, however.  They're state troops liable only to their Governors for service for the most part, unlike National Guardsmen who also serve as a reserve of the Army.

By this point during the Great War, Wyoming was experimenting with mustering its State Guard.  Of interest, rifle production had now caught up with demand and the State Guard was being issued brand new rifles, almost certainly M1917 Enfields, which were replacing the Krag rifle of Spanish American War vintage.  As Krags were perfectly adequate for what the Home Guard was to do, and indeed wasn't really obsolete in larger terms, it shows that production was catching up with need by this point in the war.

_________________________________________________________________________________

*As we earlier noted, the US also formed sort of a national militia of this type in the form of the United States Guards during the war.

"Companies M and K, Three hundred and twenty-sixth Infantry, Eighty-second Division, advancing on enemy positions, throwing hand grenades. Choloy, France. August 1, 1918."


A Difference of Prospectives

A German friend of mine recently lost his job on a German horse farm when it sold.  So he resumed his prior occupation as a game warden in a high risk region of Africa.

My reaction was envy.  So was my son's.  My wife's, on the other hand, was something akin to horror and sympathy.

More proof, as if any was needed, that man and women do not think alike, not matter what the coffee drinkers in the faculty lounge might think.

Best To Not Sweat The Small Stuff, Because It Could Kill You

Truly, a modern plague:
Best To Not Sweat The Small Stuff, Because It Could Kill You
Chronic stress is hazardous to health and can lead to early death from heart disease, cancer and other health problems. But it turns out it doesn't matter whether the stress comes from major events in life or from minor problems. Both can be deadly.
Life has always been stressful.  But to the current level in average society, let alone in "good jobs"?

Tuesday, July 31, 2018

Blog Mirror: Big hats & even bigger jobs: Celebrating World Ranger Day

The Aerodrome: A milestone in aviation history: Aviators parachute from from moving aircraft in France. . . .and Texas. And Natural gas makes a coal replacing appearance.

From our companion blog, The Aerodrome:

A milestone in aviation history: Aviators parachute from from moving aircraft in France. . . .and Texas.


It was reported that on this day, in 1918, a French aviator, and an American one, both experimented with parachuting from moving aircraft.

Like all things aviation,  parachutes were advancing fairly rapidly under the pressure of World War One. They'd already been introduced for balloon crewmen, who could parachute out of balloons in combat scenarios.  Indeed, they typically did so when it became apparent a balloon was about to be attacked, as they had to put the parachute harness on in order to get out. They did not simply routinely wear it.  But up until this point in the war, it had not been the case that aviators wore parachutes or even could.

Indeed, it would not become standard until after the war.  While these experiments proved it could be done, it remained the case that wearing an early parachute in an early airplane was not easy to do, and indeed, was largely impractical for the most part.

A larger view of the same newspaper can be seen on our Today In Wyoming's History site for this date.
Meanwhile, in the other local newspaper, the news was all about oil. . . and natural gas.


Indeed, this paper has a number of interesting things reported in it in the energy news that would predict the future.  Gasoline was coming on. . . but natural gas was arriving and replacing coal.

Monday, July 30, 2018

So, having babbled about Boy Scout uniforms, perhaps I should address the Girl Scouts as well.


 Extremely serious looking Girl Scout with semiphore flags, 1920.

And indeed, I just sort of recently did^:

We've discussed Boy Scout uniforms and caps. . . so we should take a look at the Girl Scouts. "“Activities at the Girl Scouts Camp, Central Valley, New York. Line of the Girl Scouts waiting their turn to get their wash basins full of water at the water pipes.” July 21, 1918.


But I don't know much about them.

Girls Scouts on July 21, 1918.  Note the semi military uniforms, which pretty closely reflect the uniforms adopted by female auxiliaries of various types providing service during the Great War.
  (Note, I think the photograph above might include both Girl Scouts and Camp Fire Girls.  I'm not sure, but now that I know a little more about these uniforms, I think that's likely the case.  About this time the organizations attempted to merge).
Except there's few hats in evidence.  Indeed, only one.

Is that a sailor's Dixie Cap?
The problem is that I don't know anything about female costume.

Now, let me first note that I'm not trying to use a dismissive term in referring to female dress as "costume".  I'm using the term in the larger sense, as in clothing and fashion.  And, in regards to that, I don't know anything about female fashions at all, other than that a lot of them are really darned weird.

Indeed, for that reason, I've rarely strayed into the topic.  My most notable example of doing it was in regards to an item that was developed from a Reddit topic on "100 Years Ago" , that started off:

Women and Trousers. No big historical deal, or the triumph of the harpies in trousers?

 
 This overalls wearing lass, whom is portrayed an industrial giant (take that, Rosie the Riveter) is wearing overalls, albeit one of the baggiest pairs of overalls ever.  She's also wearing a canvass cap to cover her hair, with hair styles being voluminous at the time.  She doesn't look very happy, we might note.
From Reddit's 100 Years Ago Today Subreddit:

Munich Authorities Put Ban On Bloomers

Military Aroused Because Women Have Been Wearing Them To Church

So reported the New York Times.

A review of the article reveals that Bavarian authorities were appalled by women taking up trousers, which they'd done as they were working in male roles given World War One.  Perhaps they were feeling like Rooster Cogburn in True Grit by that time of the war:
And that very long post from last February goes on from there.

Women are over half of the American population and while I'm not completely certain, I think they were in the period of time this blog focuses on as well. Knowing that off hand is a little difficult as there are varying factors at play in regards to human mortality that impact that statistic.  Prior to the mid 19th Century, for example, men tended to outnumber women as death during childbirth was extremely  high.  In the 18th Century it was enormously common for men to be married two or three times during their lifetime simply for that reason.  Men of means quite often tended to marry women near their own ages and then marry progressively younger spouses as their first ones died in that fashion where as by the last 19th Century things had changed so much that in the same demographic remarrying due to that was regarded as somewhat shameful.  Having said that, starting in the mid 19th Century industrial deaths, nearly all male, started to ramp up so much due to industrialization that the rate of households headed by a single female became approximately as common as they are today, simply due to that.

All of which has nothing to do with clothing.

Or maybe it does.  I'm not sure.

But it does mean that not addressing female clothing is ignoring at least half of the population, a pretty big historical omission.

Adding to our problem, however, is the fact that female clothing evolved at an amazing rapid rate.  It's simply incredible.  In comparison, male clothing evolved hardly at all.  On this topic, I recently posted an item on the same subreddit asking the question of why women's clothing had evolved so quickly between World War One and World War Two.  A knowledgeable poster came back and noted that my time frame observations were simply incorrect.  Women's clothing was evolving extremely rapidly prior to World War One and just kept on evolving.

And Girl Scouts uniforms are part of that, or reflect it. . . but maybe less than we might suppose.

Indeed, because that is the case, and because its just part of a bigger story, I likely should discuss women's clothing first.

But I'm not going to.

Okay, so let's take a look at Girl Scout uniforms . . and in so doing, let's take a look first at the Girl Scouts.

The Girl Scouts date, more or less, to March 12, 1912 when they were first founded by Juliette Gordon Low.

Juliette Gordon Low not dressed in a Scouting uniform and bearing no resemblance to Lord Baden Powell.

Mrs. Low was a Southerner, but with Chicago roots oddly enough, of a patrician background and had the values associated with that class.  Born in 1860, she was born into the Civil War and grew up, therefore, mostly in the post war American South.  She was highly educated and attended the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, where she met her husband Gordon.  Their marriage was not happy, but was sort of a characteristically English one, in which her husband depleted his assets with hunting trips and gambling. By 1900 they were basically on the outs and were in the process of obtaining a divorce, when he died in 1905.

Low, much later, with two Girl Guides

Low descended from pioneer stock in part and had outdoor interests.  More than that, however, she had met and been influenced by Lord Baden Powell. We've already dealt with Powell in various posts about the Boy Scouts, so we'll forget that here, but it's interesting to note that at the very first, while the Boy Scouts were devoted to the manly, Christian, upbringing of boys, they didn't actually at first exclude girls  It's just that their activities were not thought of as terribly feminine and camping, as a female pursuit, was not common.  Still, there was enough interest on the part of girls (and presumably their parents) that a 1909 Boy Scout publication complained a bit on social restrictions imposed on girls and it made at least camping difficult for them, when it noted; "If a girl is not allowed to run, or even hurry, to swim, ride a bike, or raise her arms above her head, how can she become a Scout?"

How indeed?

In spite of this girls did register with the very early British Boy Scouts at first, making our earlier comments regarding the all male Boy Scouts slightly, although only slightly, suspect.  This came to an end in 1909 however when British newspaper commentary scandalized it.  Lord Baden Powell therefore asked his sister, Agnes Baden-Powell, to form the companion organization for girls, which  was formed as the Girl Guides.*   The focus of the organization can, in some ways, be illustrated by an early book by the Baden Powells regarding them.

The Handbook for Girl Guides with its obvious British Empire focus. The uniform the Guide is depicted as wearing was in fact the one they wore and which some American Girl Scouts wore for a long time.

Okay, at this point, a lot of this probably is starting to sound painfully familiar, and that's because I've covered part of it before, although only briefly and not really in depth. Nonetheless, rather than repeat what I wrote earlier, I'm just going to link back into it here:









The Scouts, both Girl and Boy, had competition right from the onset.  Sure proof that Lord Baden Powell had tapped into something is provided by the fact that copycat organizations sprung up right away.  Most of these  organizations rose and fell pretty quickly, and most of them were pretty much copies of the Scouts but without the large organization backing it up and the all that went with it. So its' not too surprising that they didn't last all that long.  Some were a little more militaristic than the Scouts, particularly early on, and emphasized things like shooting, although that was an aspect of the Scouts as well.  I won't, therefore, dwell much with them.  I will note, however, that oddly enough the Boy Scouts itself competed a bit against it self in this area when, in 1912, it organized the Sea Scouts, a youth organization that was focused on the sea and seafaring skills, but which very clearly modeled itself on the Navy in uniform and early appearance, showing how close to being a quasi private military training organization the Scouts really were.

Taking this forward the Scouts remained really strong for a really long time.  I don't know what percentage of American youth belonged to the Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts, etc., but it seems to have been a fairly large percentage.  As recently as the 1950s it seems to me that there was sort of an assumption that boys and girls became Scouts.  Even as recently as the 1970s quite a few were, although I was only a Boy Scout myself for a few months (so few that I usually say I was never a Scout, too few to really count).

Well there I guess you have the organizations early days.  And to some extent, depending upon where you are, all of these organizations are still around. There aren't Girl Guides in the US, but there are elsewhere. And the Camp Fire Girls are still around.

What you've perhaps also noticed is that the clothing designated for these organizations was. . well odd.

 Girl Scouts building a fire while camping in 1912.  Quite obviously, whatever the official uniform was, these girls were dressed up in a fashion resembling Indians, and had their hair braided for the same reason.

Indeed, in looking at photos of early Girl Scouts what becomes clear is that whatever the uniform was supposed to be, more often than not somebody decided to have no uniform at all (understandable) or to dress them up like Indians, which fit into a certain cultural thing going on at the time, but which is strange.

 Very early Girl Scouts before their uniforms had really become fully standardized, learning to shoot.

Officially, at the very first, English Girl Guides wore a uniform that was militaristic in nature and based on the Boy Scouts, but with a skirt. The depicting on the book inserted above gives a really good illustration of that.  The campaign hat yielded nearly immediately, however, to a different pattern, but it was still there.  It always featured a skirt of some sort, however.

 Early Girl Scout learning archery in the standard early uniform but wearing a Montana Peak type campaign hat.

Now, we already, as noted above, have a long post on women and trousers.  I'm not going to go back and redo all that here, but I'll note just from the onset that it isn't true that women didn't wear trouser at all up until some point in the mid 20th Century.  That's baloney.  But it is the case that in most cultures they didn't until starting in the late 19th Century.  I went into that there.

 Girl Scouts working in a garden, probably during World War One.  Most of these girls have the early pattern campaign hat.  Gardening was emphasized in American society during the Great War and both Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts actively took it up.

Trousers are obviously better for camping, and I'd argue that they're better for everything, so it is odd to us to today to see camping girls wearing skirts.  Indeed, in a modern context, it'd be completely absurd.  But it wasn't so much the case at the time, and if you view the photographs we've put of women in service and quasi service during World War One, you'll find the exact some thing.  Indeed, what you'll also find is that this is the point in time, the early 20th Century and late 19th Century, when trousers started coming in for women.  Indeed, the Great War played a role in that, but due to factory work, not due to wartime field service.  So again, you'd think that Girl Scout uniforms wouldn't have been so darned impractical looking. . . to our eyes.

 A Washington D. C. Girl Scout troop gardening during World War One.  One of these Scouts has departed from the uniform and is wearing a campaign hat.

More than a little of that was just cultural, and indeed all of these female youth organizations are a bit of an oddity for that reason as women and camping just wasn't a thing, and for real reasons.  Without going into it in huge detail, camping fits into a male role that's on the hunting/fighting/fighting sliding scale that's embedded deep in the male genetic code and which Lord Baden Powell was trying to foster in a Christian sense.  This is not to say, rather obviously, that women don't like to camp.  Anyhow, as the article on women in trousers explores, women didn't usually wear trousers that much until this point in time, and it came on kind of slowly.

 Girl Scouts selling war bonds with Alice (Roosevelt) Longworth, 1917.  All the women's clothing in this photograph was set to be rapidly obsolete.

One thing that I didn't address there (as I'm not an expert on the topic and it didn't occur to me), however, and I'm not going to really address here either particularly in this context, is that women's undergarments and related stuff evolved a lot in this period of time as well and in a fashion that allowed women to wear pants every day.  Enough said about that, but that's an aspect of this that is simply forgotten entirely. Female clothing featured fairly long skirts for a long time not because it was keeping women down, but because of various concerns that relate to biology and decency.  Enough said on that.

 Camping Girl Scouts, 1919.

But women's clothing was evolving in this period with lightening speed.  Oddly, Girl Scout uniforms really didn't.  It's weird.

 Girl Scout in full uniform with outdoor gear in the 1920s.  Here too this Scout has retained the M1911 type campaign hat.

Thankfully they did get over the Indian maiden thing, which was really silly.  The first official uniform looked a lot like that of the English Girl Guides, and featured a homemade dark blue blouse and skirt with sateen ties, felt campaign hats, and long black stockings.  Ties were had entered women's clothing at the time and were pretty popular, although I'll note that they are one horrific item of male clothing that women were able to dump and not be afflicted with.  It's interesting to note that the uniform was homemade, which shows right from the onset how the focus of the organization was different and at that time domestic.

Girl Scout leaders wore a different, not homemade, uniform of dark khaki, serge, or twill with a tailored shirt and a silk tie in a four-in-hand knot. Their uniform included a trefoil pin worn just below the knot of the tie which signified the Girl Scouts Promise: "To serve God and your country, to help people at all times, and to live by the Girl Scout law"^^^ which showed the focus of the organization and which leaned heavily on the focus of the Boy Scouts.

Girl Scouts marching in a Memorial Day parade, 1944.

Changing more rapidly than the Boy Scouts, but always with a seeming domestic focus, in the economically stretched 1930s the Girl Scouts introduced a very simple one piece cotton dress in light green. This introduced their distinctive color and also reflected a very real fashion change in female clothing.  Simple dresses were now pretty common whereas in the 1910s and 1920s they were a bit more complicated and included more fabric.  They also introduced the green beret which they've kept ever since.  A Girl Scout of the 1930s would be pretty recognizable as a Girl Scout now, in fact, as the common mental preception of them was fixed at about that time.  This changed again in the 1940s and a yellow tie was added, with the introduction of uniform that was a bit more elaborate and which I suspect was due to the poverty of the Great Depression being introduced. Also at this time a seperate unfiorm was created for hte junior organization, the Brownies, but I'm going to omit that discussion as, juast as with the Cub Scouts, I find it too dull.

 Girl Scouts learning to knit, 1942.

Still the interesting thing here is that during the 1930s women's trouser really were coming in and very common.  A lot of that is due to the introuction of much more practical undergarments I'm not going to discuss, but by the 1930s women were frequently wearing work and dress trousers.  It's really strange that an organizaton that theoretically had an outdoor focus didn't go to them, or even have an official issue of them, but that tells you a lot.  At the same point in time in which the Boy Scouts were abandoning their World War One Army type unform in favor of a World War Two type Army uniofrm, the Girl Scouts were sticking with dresses.  The focus remained domestic.

 Girl Scouts setting table, 1931.

And so it was in the 1950s and 60s as well.  In the 50s a loose big green one piece dress was introduced and a version of it stuck through the 60s. The big green sash for merit badges came in. The beret stuck around.  In the 70s, 80s and 90s this all remained true and versions of the earlier uniforms were around always with a green skirt of some sort and a sash.  But by that time, as with the Boy Scouts, the practice had evolved to let girls wear just one item and that meant that they could wear something more practical.  It wasn't until the 2000s, however, that there were official trousers.

Girl Scouts picking up trash in the Potomac, 1970s.  I think this is likely a pretty good example of how Girl Scouts really dressed when outdoors, at least since the 1950s.

So, in posting all of this, as weird as it may sound, I realized that, well. . .  I don't really know what the Girl Scouts are about.  I don't know what they've ever been about.

I do know what the Boy Scouts are about because, . . . well maybe because I'm a guy and I was in the Boy Scouts for about 3.5 seconds and I'm otherwise just much more familiar with them.  The Boy Scouts, even though I was never one of them for any appreciable amount of time, seem sort of an obvious organization to me, in context.  As a mirror image of the Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts strike me that way too, but they obviously actually aren't a mirror image of the Boy Scouts.

They did, sort of, start off that way. And the early photos of them I posted above really show that.  But what about their texts?

Well, let's see what Load Baden Powell had to say in their 1919 manual:

"How did Scouting come to be used by girls?" That is what I have been asked. Well, it was this way. In the beginning I had used Scouting—that is, wood craft, handiness, and cheery helpfulness—as a means for training young soldiers when they first joined the army, to help them become handy, capable men and able to hold their own with anyone instead of being mere drilled machines.
You have read about the Wars in your country against the Red Indians, of the gallantry of your soldiers against the cunning of the Red Man, and what is more, of the pluck of your women on those dangerous frontiers.
Well, we have had much the same sort of thing in South Africa. Over and over again I have seen there the wonderful bravery and resourcefulness of the women when the tribes of Zulu or Matabeles have been out on the war path against the white settlers.
In the Boer war a number of women volunteered to help my forces as nurses or otherwise; they were full of pluck and energy, but unfortunately they had never been trained to do anything, and so with all the good-will in the world they were of no use. I could not help feeling how splendid it would be if one could only train them in peace time in the same way one trained the young soldiers—that is, through Scoutcraft.
I afterwards took to training boys in that way, but I had not been long at it before the girls came along, and offered to do the very thing I had hoped for, they wanted to take up Scouting also.
They did not merely want to be imitators of the boys; they wanted a line of their own.
So I gave them a smart blue uniform and the names of "Guides" and my sister wrote an outline of the scheme. The name Guide appealed to the British girls because the pick of our frontier forces in India is the Corps of Guides. The term cavalry or infantry hardly describes it since it is composed of all-round handy men ready to take on any job in the campaigning line and do it well.
Then too, a woman who can be a good and helpful comrade to her brother or husband or son along the path of life is really a guide to him.
The name Guide therefore just describes the members of our sisterhood who besides being handy and ready for any kind of duty are also a jolly happy family and likely to be good, cheery comrades to their mankind.
The coming of the Great War gave the Girl Guides their opportunity, and they quickly showed the value of their training by undertaking a variety of duties which made them valuable to their country in her time of need.
My wife, Lady Baden-Powell, was elected by the members to be the Chief Guide, and under her the movement has gone ahead at an amazing pace, spreading to most foreign countries.
It is thanks to Mrs. Juliette Low, of Savannah, that the movement was successfully started in America, and though the name Girl Scouts has there been used it is all part of the same sisterhood, working to the same ends and living up to the same Laws and Promise.
If all the branches continue to work together and become better acquainted with each other as they continue to become bigger it will mean not only a grand step for the sisterhood, but what is more important it will be a real help toward making the new League of Nations a living force.
How can that be? In this way:
If the women of the different nations are to a large extent members of the same society and therefore in close touch and sympathy with each other, although belonging to different countries, they will make the League a real bond not merely between the Governments, but between the Peoples themselves and they will see to it that it means Peace and that we have no more of War.
Not quite the same as the Boy Scouts, and indeed, sort of set focused against it in a way.

Well, the old post on their original merit badges shows a subtle difference.  Consider:

GIRL SCOUT PROFICIENCY TESTS AND SPECIAL MEDALS




I. Introduction to Proficiency Tests.
II. Proficiency Tests:

 *** Subjects marked thus are specially recommended for First Class Scouts or girls at least sixteen years old.

 **** Subjects marked thus are for Scouts eighteen years and over.
At least as of 1919, their manual had a focus on domestic things, but it also had one on woodcraft. That seems to me to sort of define it.  It was a mirror image of the Boy Scouts, without the implied martial air, and with a focus on domestic life that reflected social views regarding a woman's role in the world.  It wasn't sexist in that fashion, and indeed in some ways the concept of women outdoorsmen doing such things as hunting and fishing, etc., was fairly radical.

Over time, I think, it continued to have that focus and I think it still does today.  Maybe its because I know less about it, but it seems to me that it's managed to stay truer to itself somehow.  Which may be why when the Boy Scouts recently opened their doors to girls, the Girl Scouts sort of laughed under their breath and replied that they were the organization for girls.   They always were.
_________________________________________________________________________________

^FWIW, an early post on this blog which featured Girl Scout merit badges was hugely popular at the time and was one of the most popular posts on the blog for a long time.  So we haven't completely ignored the topic.

^^Okay, I realize that this was a different time, but having girls dress this way for an outdoor activity is and was darned near criminal.  Particularly for girls in a boat.  This is crazy.

*The sort of strange Englishness of the early Scouts, male and female, is epitomized by the Baden Powell family. We've dealt with Lord Baden Powell before, but it's interesting to note in this context that he did not marry until he was 55 years old, to a woman who was 23.  There's been widespread speculation about his being a homosexual, but it seems largely unwarranted and the marriage genuine.  Nonetheless a marriage that late in life to somebody so much younger is a bit unusual.  They had three children.

Agnes Baden Powell had been engaged early in life but never married.

They were both children of the  Reverend Baden Powell, the Savilian Professor of Geometry at the University of Oxford, and an Anglican clergyman.  Typical of the era, and illustrative of a point raised above regarding female mortality, the Reverand Baden Powell was married three times and had fourteen children, only nine of whom lived to adulthood.  His first wife died after the childless couple had been married fifteen years.  He had children by his next two wives, the second of which died after seven years of marriage.  His third wife outlived him.

^^^At least in 1919, the Girl Scout Law was:
 LAWS
IA Girl Scout's Honor is to be Trusted
IIA Girl Scout is Loyal
IIIA Girl Scout's Duty is to be Useful and to Help Others
IVA Girl Scout is a Friend to All and a Sister to every other Girl Scout
VA Girl Scout is Courteous
VIA Girl Scout is a Friend to Animals
VIIA Girl Scout obeys Orders
VIIIA Girl Scout is Cheerful
IXA Girl Scout is Thrifty
XA Girl Scout is Clean in Thought, Word and Deed




Today In Wyoming's History: July 30, 1918. Joyce Kilmer killed in action.

Today In Wyoming's History: July 30:

1918. Poet Joyce Kilmer, U.S. Army sergeant, killed in France.


TREES

I think that I shall never see
A poem lovely as a tree.

A tree whose hungry mouth is prest
Against the sweet earth's flowing breast;

A tree that looks at God all day,
And lifts her leafy arms to pray;

A tree that may in summer wear
A nest of robins in her hair;

Upon whose bosom snow has lain;
Who intimately lives with rain.

Poems are made by fools like me,
But only God can make a tree .

You can tell that you thinking has been altered by your occupation as a lawyer when. . .

the primary thing about Michael Cohen's revelations about his relationship with Donald Trump you think about is how on earth is that not a violation of the attorney client privileged.

I think that's the way that story strikes most lawyers.  We all learn a lot of details and secrets from our clients, and we're supposed to keep them secret.  Isn't Cohen blowing that?

I worry a bit about this actually changing the nature of the privilege, which would be a very bad thing indeed.  Hush money for trysts with Playboy models?  That's icky, but I didn't think Trump was a super admirable guy to start with.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg decides to keep on keeping on until age 90.

Or so she has informed reporters in New York.

And she appears serious.  She's hired clerks for the next two Supreme Court terms.

There's little doubt that Ginsberg remains sharp at age 85 and, given that she is still sharp at age 85, she's likely to remain so.

But there's something fundamentally wrong with a system that allows jurist to retain a position of such great important into their extremely advanced old age.  Should her mind fail, or the mind of other justices following her lead, removing them is difficult in the extreme and would frankly always impose a cloud over their final years on the bench.


And besides that, at 85, let alone 90, Ginsberg is far, far older than the majority of Americans and even lawyers.  She's occupying a position that's a public trust, but one granted her years ago by people who have long since retired or died.  Of course, she could simply be choosing to try to outlast the Trump presidency, in which case she likely guessed wrong about Hillary Clinton's chances in the last election (as I also did).  Indeed, had Clinton won, I'm still fairly convinced that her first Supreme Court pick would have been Barrack Obama.

This aspect of this system just isn't quite right any way you look at it.  The Wyoming judicial retirement age is 70.  That seems like a good system.

News on the local boys. July 30, 1918.


More than anything, readers of Wyoming's newspapers likely were hoping for news on what was going on with Wyomingites who were serving in the Great War.  The Laramie Boomerang on this Tuesday, July 30, 1918, gave them that, letting them know what was going on with the Guard units that had been brought into service, and then formed into new units.

1918 Military Sabre -Target Dummies Course -Cayeux - Western Front. July 30, 1918.

1918 Military Lance - Target Course - Cayeux - Western Front

The Big Picture: Headquarters and officers, 45th Inf., July 30, 1918. Camp Sheridan, Alabama




Sunday, July 29, 2018

The Food Desert. Disappearing Grocery Stores.



From this morning's Tribune comes a human interest story that directly relates to the focus of this blog:
In Midwest, there are three local choices for food: a gas station, a church food bank and a bench outside of the post office.
There was a grocery store, off of state Highway 387. It closed either five or 10 years ago, depending on whom you believe at the Arcade Bar, a watering hole in nearby Edgerton. In either case, the store is locked and boarded up now. The driveway is overgrown, and a row of storage lockers sits in the field behind it. Were it not for the bartender pointing the store out, visitors would drive by, completely unaware that at one point, there was fresh food for sale in this small community.
Kaycee’s general store is 30 miles away. Casper and its handful of grocery stores is more than 40 miles to the south. But the Big D, the gas station, is in town. It has milk, cartons of eggs, pre-packaged cold cuts and frozen hamburgers. There are no fresh vegetables. The restaurant in the gas station has fried chicken meals that top 2,000 calories.
“There are people in need here,” Donna Miller said from her community garden in Midwest last week. She explained that the older residents give grocery lists to the younger people who drive into Casper.
We've dealt with this before, but  this story does document a real change, as well as a real burden for people living in small Wyoming towns, and I'd wager small towns all over.

First on the closure, I recall that store and I recall stopping in there, but I couldn't tell you how long ago now it was either.  The older you get, the more recently it seems things like that occurred.  It feels like five years to me, but I'll bet its ten.

Anyhow, back to the story, all the little towns have this struggle, pretty much.  The situation in Midwest and Edgerton is noted in the story.  Expanding out just a little bit, in this county in the other small towns there aren't any real grocery stores in any of them.  Powder River had a gas station that carried some items, and a bar that sold package liquor (all bars can sell package liquor) but they both closed about a decade or so ago.  Out at Clarks Corner there used to be a crossroads gas station that sold some convenience items (and which had a bar and sold liquor) before that locality started to be developed into a rural subdivision which became a sort of town, but it's closed.  Alcova has a small store that sells convenience items (and beer) and does quite a business with fishermen, but it's not a full grocery store by any means.  The two nearby reservoirs that are heavily used have marinas that sell convenience items (I've never been in either, so I can't answer the beer question).  Waltman and HIland both have stores, although the Waltman one was closed for quite some time and may have just reopened for hunting season last year, I'm not sure.  Neither are full stores, although Hiland has a restaurant as well, as Waltman once did, associated with their small stores.  You can buy gasoline at Waltman and Alcova.  Glenrock, over the county line, does have a small grocery store.

Now, if you wanted fresh meat, let's say, or fresh vegetables, in most of these areas you are going to have to drive to a distant town. Sometimes very distant.

And we could go on and on.  Shoshoni, for example, doesn't have  grocery store.  People there must drive to Riverton.

This phenomenon is sometimes call a Food Desert, and before its misunderstood, it also applies to lots of urban areas, particularly poorer ones. And it reflects the consolidation of grocery stores.

Consider this again.  Casper at one time had the Grant Street Grocery, Braddis Grocery, Elk Street Grocery, and some small grocery store down on Ash Street whose name I don't recall.  My father sometimes patronized Braddis', which was the largest of the ones noted above, and when I was a kid a neighboring family often sent their children, whom I was friends with, down to the one on Ash Street whose name I can't recall.  Braddis' store was downtown and delivered.

And those are the stores I can remember.  There may have been more small local groceries I don't.  I do recall that in addition to Safeway and Albertson's, the big national grocery store chains, we also had an Ideal (which also goes by some other name I can't recall).

Of all of these, only Grant Street and Braddis' remain, and they have changed in order to stay in business. Grant Street is a specialty grocery store, although if you lived nearby you could walk there and get meat, bread and milk if you had the need.  Braddis' is a butcher shop, their meat counter always having been legendary.

Even the story of the big grocery stores has changed.  Safeway was purchased by Riddley's in Casper and now the same entity owns both the Albertson's stores and the former Safeway stores. They have to compete with Walmart, the giant retail entity, that sells groceries.  K-Mart, which I never go into, does as well, I think.  Smiths has a huge grocery store here and is also a chain, with their store located in what was once a Gibson's.  The two Buttrey's, however, bit the dust.  And there's a Natural Grocers, which specializes in what it sounds like.  Mills and Casper both have Family Dollar stores which do sell groceries.  Evansville and Bar Nunn, which adjoin Casper like Mills, don't have any grocery stores, but its a short drive into Casper for their residents.

So, if you are in Casper, there are plenty of full grocery stores around to choose from, but you are almost certainly going to have to go to one of the big chain ones unless you make an absolutely dedicated effort not to, and you likely also have a really substantial garden (which this year I did not).  If you are in a small town which does not immediately border a big one. . . you are driving to a large one, and that means you are putting in no less than thirty miles, one way.

And if you aspire to be a small town retailer of the type that was once known as a "Grocer" or a "Green Grocer", you have an uphill battle, to say the least.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Related Threads:

Food: Seasonal, local, and from the grocery store. A revolution we don't often recognize.

The Corner Store. . . .isn't there.

Not that local. Dairies

First modern grocery store opens in Memphis, Tennessee. September 6, 1916.

Foodies, locovores, fishing poles and sychronicity