Showing posts with label Newspapers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Newspapers. Show all posts

Thursday, November 18, 2021

Friday November 18, 1921. No small beers, no new ships.


The U.S. Senate passed the Willis-Campbell Act on this day in 1921 prohibiting physicians from proscribing beer as a medical remedy. They could still prescribe hard alcohol and wine.

On the same day, the British suspended new ship construction in light of progress at the Washington Naval Conference talks.   And Roscoe Arbuckle's trial was proceeding.

Arbuckle with his defense team and brother.

Marshall Foch visited New York City's statue of Joan d'Arc.

Marshal Ferdinand Jean Marie Foch with mineralogist George Frederick Kunz at a ceremony held at the Joan of Arc statue in New York City. Standing at the right, is Anna Vaughn Hyatt Huntington, sculptor of the Joan of Arc statue, and Jacqueline Vernot holding flowers.

The Soviet Union, which was going to have an economy based on pure ownership by the proletariat of the means of production, figured out that banks were a necessity and crated a state bank.  The Soviet economy was collapsing.

Wednesday, October 27, 2021

Monday, October 27, 1941. Navy Day. Chicago Tribune limits Japanese capacity to strike, Germans break out.

Honolulu prior to World War Two.

President Roosevelt called for the arming of merchant ships in his Navy Day address on this day in 1941.

Five months ago tonight I proclaimed to the American people the existence of a state of unlimited emergency.

Since then much has happened. Our Army and Navy are temporarily in Iceland in the defense of the Western Hemisphere.

Hitler has attacked shipping in areas close to the Americas in the North and South Atlantic.

Many American-owned merchant ships have been sunk on the high seas. One American destroyer was attacked on September 4. Another destroyer was attacked and hit on October 17. Eleven brave and loyal men of our Navy were killed by the Nazis.

We have wished to avoid shooting. But the shooting has started. And history has recorded who fired the first shot. In the long run, however, all that will matter is who fired the last shot.

America has been attacked. The U. S. S. Kearny is not just a Navy ship. She belongs to every man, woman, and child in this Nation.

Illinois, Alabama, California, North Carolina, Ohio, Louisiana, Texas, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arkansas, New York, Virginia -- those are the home States of the honored dead and wounded of the Kearny. Hitler's torpedo was directed at every American, whether he lives on our seacoasts or in the innermost part of the Nation, far from the seas and far from the guns and tanks of the marching hordes of would-be conquerors of the world.

The purpose of Hitler's attack was to frighten the American people off the high seas -- to force us to make a trembling retreat. This is not the first time he has misjudged the American spirit. That spirit is now aroused.

If our national policy were to be dominated by the fear of shooting, then all of our ships and those of our sister republics would have to be tied up in home harbors. Our Navy would have to remain respectfully -- abjectly -- behind any line which Hitler might decree on any ocean as his own dictated version of his own war zone.

Naturally, we reject that absurd and insulting suggestion. We reject it because of our own self-interest, because of our own self-respect, because, most of all, of our own good faith. Freedom of the seas is now, as it has always been, a fundamental policy of your Government and mine.

Hitler has often protested that his plans for conquest do not extend across the Atlantic Ocean. But his submarines and raiders prove otherwise. So does the entire design of his new world order.

For example, I have in my possession a secret map made in Germany by Hitler's government -- by the planners of the new world order. It is a map of South America and a part of Central America, as Hitler proposes to reorganize it. Today in this area there are 14 separate countries. The geographical experts of Berlin, however, have ruthlessly obliterated all existing boundary lines; and have divided South America into five vassal states, bringing the whole continent under their domination. And they have also so arranged it that the territory of one of these new puppet states includes the Republic of Panama and our great life line - the Panama Canal.

That is his plan. It will never go into effect.

This map makes clear the Nazi design not only against South America but against the United States itself.

Your Government was in its possession another document made in Germany by Hitler's government. It is a detailed plan, which, for obvious reasons, the Nazis did not wish and do not wish to publicize just yet, but which they are ready to impose a little later on a dominated world -- if Hitler wins. It is a plan to abolish all existing religions - Protestant, Catholic, Mohammedan, Hindu, Buddhist, and Jewish alike. The property of all churches will be seized by the Reich and its puppets. The cross and all other symbols of religion are to be forbidden. The clergy are to be forever silenced under penalty of the concentration camps, where even now so many fearless men are being tortured because they have placed God above Hitler.

In the place of the churches of our civilization, there is to be set up an international Nazi church -- a church which will be served by orators sent out by the Nazi government. In the place of the Bible, the words of Mein Kampf will be imposed and enforced as Holy Writ. And in place of the cross of Christ will be put two symbols -- the swastika and the naked sword.

A god of blood and iron will take the place of the God of love and mercy. Let us well ponder that statement which I have made tonight.

These grim truths which I have told you of the present and future plans of Hitlerism will, of course, be hotly denied tonight and tomorrow in the controlled press and radio of the Axis Powers. And some Americans - not many - will continue to insist that Hitler's plans need not worry us and that we should not concern ourselves with anything that goes on beyond rifle shot of our own shores.

The protestations of these American citizens -- few in number -- will, as usual, be paraded with applause through the Axis press and radio during the next few days in an effort to convince the world that the majority of Americans are opposed to their duly chosen Government and in reality are only waiting to jump on Hitler's band wagon when it comes this way.

The motive of such Americans is not the point at issue. The fact is that Nazi propaganda continues in desperation to seize upon such isolated statements as proof of American disunity.

The Nazis have made up their own list of modern American heroes. It is, fortunately, a short list. I am glad that it does not contain my name.

All of us Americans, of all opinions, are faced with the choice between the kind of world we want to live in and the kind of world which Hitler and his hordes would impose upon us.

None of us wants to burrow under the ground and live in total darkness like a comfortable mole.

The forward march of Hitler and of Hitlerism can be stopped - and it will be stopped.

Very simply and very bluntly, we are pledged to pull our own oar in the destruction of Hitlerism.

And when we have helped to end the curse of Hitlerism, we shall help to establish a new peace which will give to decent people everywhere a better chance to live and prosper in security and in freedom and in faith.

Each day that passes we are producing and providing more and more arms for the men who are fighting on actual battle fronts. That is our primary task.

And it is the Nation's will that these vital arms and supplies of all kinds shall neither be locked up in American harbors nor sent to the bottom of the sea. It is the Nation's will that America shall deliver the goods. In open defiance of that will, our ships have been sunk and our sailors have been killed.

I say that we do not propose to take this lying down.

Our determination not to take it lying down has been expressed in the orders to the American Navy to shoot on sight. Those orders stand.

Furthermore, the House of Representatives has already voted to amend part of the Neutrality Act of 1937, today outmoded by force of violent circumstances. The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations has also recommended elimination of other hamstringing provisions in that act. That is the course of honesty and of realism.

Our American merchant ships must be armed to defend themselves against the rattlesnakes of the sea.

Our American merchant ships must be free to carry our American goods into the harbors of our friends.

Our American merchant ships must be protected by our American Navy.

It can never be doubted that the goods will be delivered by this Nation, whose Navy believes in the traditions of "Damn the torpedoes; full speed ahead!"

Yes; our Nation will and must speak from every assembly line. Yes; from every coal mine -- the all-inclusive whole of our vast industrial machine. Our factories and our shipyards are constantly expanding. Our output must be multiplied.

It cannot be hampered by the selfish obstruction of any small but dangerous minority of industrial managers who perhaps hold out for extra profits or for "business as usual." It cannot be hampered by the selfish obstruction of a small but dangerous minority of labor leaders who are a menace - for labor as a whole knows that that small minority is a menace -- to the true cause of labor itself, as well as to the Nation as a whole.

The lines of our essential defense now cover all the seas; and to meet the extraordinary demands of today and tomorrow our Navy grows to unprecedented size. Our Navy is ready for action. Indeed, units of it in the Atlantic patrol are in action. Its officers and men need no praise from me.

Our new Army is steadily developing the strength needed to withstand the aggressors. Our soldiers of today are worthy of the proudest traditions of the United States Army. But traditions cannot shoot down dive bombers or destroy tanks. That is why we must and shall provide, for every one of our soldiers, equipment and weapons -- not merely as good, but better than that of any other army on earth. And we are doing that right now.

For this -- and all of this -- is what we mean by total national defense.

The first objective of that defense is to stop Hitler. He can be stopped and can be compelled to dig in. And that will be the beginning of the end of his downfall, because dictatorship of the Hitler type can live only through continuing victories - increasing conquests.

The facts of 1918 are proof that a mighty German Army and a tired German people can crumble rapidly and go to pieces when they are faced with successful resistance.

Nobody who admires qualities of courage and endurance can fail to be stirred by the full-fledged resistance of the Russian people. The Russians are fighting for their own soil and their own homes. Russia needs all kinds of help -- planes, tanks, guns, medical supplies, and other aids -- toward the successful defense against the invaders. From the United States and from Britain, she is getting great quantities of those essential supplies. But the needs of her huge army will continue - and our help and British help will have to continue.

The other day the Secretary of State of the United States was asked by a Senator to justify our giving aid to Russia. His reply was: "The answer to that, Senator, depends on how anxious a person is to stop and destroy the march of Hitler in his conquest of the world. If he were anxious enough to defeat Hitler, he would not worry about who was helping to defeat him."

Upon our American production falls the colossal task of equipping our own armed forces, and helping to supply the British, the Russians, and the Chinese. In the performance of that task we dare not fail. And we will not fail.

It has not been easy for us Americans to adjust ourselves to the shocking realities of a world in which the principles of common humanity and common decency are being mowed down by the firing squads of the Gestapo. We have enjoyed many of God's blessings. We have lived in a broad and abundant land, and by our industry and productivity we have made it flourish.

There are those who say that our great good fortune has betrayed us; that we are now no match for the regimented masses who have been trained in the Spartan ways of ruthless brutality. They say that we have grown fat, and flabby, and lazy, and that we are doomed.

But those who say that know nothing of America or of American life.

They do not know that this land is great because it is a land of endless challenge. Our country was first populated, and it has been steadily developed, by men and women in whom there burned the spirit of adventure and restlessness and individual independence which will not tolerate oppression.

Ours has been a story of vigorous challenges which have been accepted and overcome, challenges of uncharted seas, of wild forests and desert plains, of raging floods and withering drought, of foreign tyrants and domestic strife, of staggering problems, social, economic, and physical; and we have come out of them the most powerful Nation, and the freest, in all of history.

Today in the face of this newest and greatest challenge of them all we Americans have cleared our decks and taken our battle stations. We stand ready in the defense of our Nation and the faith of our fathers to do what God has given us the power to see as our full duty.

The Chicago Tribune on this day in 1941 dismissed the possibility of Japan attacking the United States, even noting that an attack on the Hawaiian Islands was beyond Japanese capabilities.

The German 11th Army broke into the Crimean Peninsula.  On the same day, they captured the city of Plavsk.

Thursday, February 4, 2021

Op eds. Two to draw from.

The Tribune ran a couple of interesting op eds regarding recent stories involving or surrounding Representative Cheney.

The first was by a former head of the Wyoming Republican Party, Ron Micheli.  Micheli is highly conservative but of the traditional Republican type.  He's on record lamenting the alt right drift of the GOP in Wyoming.

He now writes opinion pieces, and his on recent events can be found here:

Micheli: We have seen gadflies like Gaetz before

Of note, Gaetz in not only portrayed as a gadfly by Micheli, the headline says Gaetz is.  Backing this up, Gaetz stated yesterday he was willing to resign from the House to defend Donald Trump in the upcoming impeachment trial, if Trump were to ask.

Trump's not going to ask.

Trump's legal problems have really created an odd sideshow for politicians who want to try to advance their careers in odd legal ways by associating themselves with him.  Ted Cruz, for example, earlier offered to argue one of Trump's election challenge cases in front of the Supreme Court, as if having Ted Cruz argue that case does anything much more than to advance the career of Ted Cruz.  Really silly.

The other was by Christine Hillegass, a psychologist living in Livingston Montana.

Hillegass: Voting her conscience is a positive

Micheli's opinions can't be discounted, given his relationship to the GOP.  Hillegass' probably can be by some, as she lives in Montana, not Wyoming, but they're interesting nonetheless.



Tuesday, November 3, 2020

The speed of the news.

So, on this night when so many are glued to their televisions, and some to their radios, and many to the net, it's worth noting on our historically minded page that this is a new thing.

A century ago only the audiences of a single radio station in the US tuned in for live coverage of the General Election. And it wasn't that live.  Even though Harding won a land slide the newspapers of that day. . . and the next, didn't have the winner, only a projection.  

I don't know that this was different following FDR's 1932 election, but it probably was.  Even at that however, a lot of people didn't really  know who had won elections until the following morning newspapers.

Television has changed all of that, and with it, our expectancies.

Wednesday, September 2, 2020

September 2, 1920. Changing views.


Most of the time when I put a newspaper up here, it's to mark some big or at least interesting century old event.  Every now and then, however it's to comment on something and how it was perceived, which by extension comments on how we perceive things now.

I see around here fairly frequently stickers that say "Welcome to Wyoming--Consider everyone armed".  It's an amusing joke based on the fact that firearms are really common here.  That's been the case as long as I can personally recall, but it also refers to the fact that over the past two decades there's been a real boom in the concealed carry movement.  I've taken a look at that and its history in this old post here:


Now, by mentioning this here, I don't mean to suggest that I'm opposed to these state laws allowing for concealed carry.  I'm not. But I do want to point out how carrying hasn't always been perceived the way it is now.

In 2020 we can take it for granted that the press is universally liberal, and indeed "progressive", unless we specifically know otherwise about a particular outlet.  In 1920, however, its a little more difficult to tell.  Papers were Democratic or Republican and generally weren't shy about noting it, but they were also pretty slavish followers of social trends, unless they were absolutely bucking them.   All of which makes the headline about Gerald Stack engaging in an act of "Slander" against Wyoming men interesting.

Under the same circumstances today, there aren't very many Wyoming men who would regard his comment as slanderous. Some would find it childish and inaccurate, and some on the political fringes would hold it up as a positive or negative example. But quite a few people would take some secret pride in the thought that everyone in the state was packing.

In 1920, however, Wyoming was seeking to overcome its frontier image even while preserving it. The Cheyenne newspaper knew that his comment wasn't true and pointed it out. Beyond that, they pointed it out as being slanderous. An insult, as it was, to the men of Wyoming.

Apparently it wasn't an insult to women, presumably because women weren't thought to be packing.

In actuality, quite a few people at the time, including quite a few people were packing and the ownership of pocket pistols was common.  Chicago, for its part, didn't have a gun control law addressing handguns until 1981, much later than most people would suppose, and it hasn't been a huge success by any measure.  Having said that, Illinois restricted the carrying of concealed handguns in 1949, following World War Two, at which time, contrary to our general myth, there was widespread national support for banning handguns.  New York City, in contrast, passed a firearms licensing act for concealable handguns in 1911, making the carrying of them without a license a felony.

Again, this isn't an argument for anything.  It's just an interesting look at how we often inaccurately imagine what the past was like.


Thursday, August 20, 2020

August 20, 1920. Football, News Radio, Ships and Transjordan

On This Date in Sports August 20, 1920, the American Professional Football Association, precursor to the NFL, formed.

The Akron Pros, one of the teams in 1920.

I don't care anything about football, but a lot of people do, and this marks a notable event.  Note that one of the players on the champion 1920 team depicted above, was black, meaning that in that very early season, football was integrated.  The drafting of the first black athlete into the NFL is generally regarded as having occurred in 1949, but in fact very early on blacks were part of the professional sport.

Advertisement for 8MK from August 31, 1920.

The first commercial radio station in the United States, 8MK (at the time) began broadcasting on this date in 1920.  The radio station, now WWJ, first broadcast on an amatuer license out of Detroit, where William E. Scripps, the newspaper publisher, started the station as a new radio station.

It's still in business and its still news radio for the Detroit area.

In the Great Lakes area, on the same day, the SS Superior City collided with the Willis L. King in Whitefish Bay, resulting in the loss of 29 lives.

Far outside the United States, the British representative in Palestine announced a proclamation extending his governance into Jordan. The British rapidly repudiated the effort and denounced it.


[August 20, 1920]  The high commissioner's first visit to Transjordan. Reading of "The Durbar", a proclamation annexing Transjordan, in Es-Salt

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Bari Weiss resigns from the New York Times and raises the topic of press bias.

While we're on the topic of newspapers, this week has seen the news that Bari Weiss of the New York Times editorial staff has found that the paper is so blisteringly biased that there's no place for anyone who isn't a Hard Left True Believer.  In departing, she wrote and published a resignation letter that's an editorial on the NYT itself.

You can find her full letter there, which is well worth reading, but a couple of things it states really stand out.  For example.
But the lessons that ought to have followed the election—lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society—have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn’t a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else. 
 * * *
Twitter is not on the masthead of The New York Times. But Twitter has become its ultimate editor.  
* * *
I was always taught that journalists were charged with writing the first rough draft of history. Now, history itself is one more ephemeral thing molded to fit the needs of a predetermined narrative. 
* * *
Part of me wishes I could say that my experience was unique. But the truth is that intellectual curiosity—let alone risk-taking—is now a liability at The Times. Why edit something challenging to our readers, or write something bold only to go through the numbing process of making it ideologically kosher, when we can assure ourselves of job security (and clicks) by publishing our 4000th op-ed arguing that Donald Trump is a unique danger to the country and the world? And so self-censorship has become the norm. 
What rules that remain at The Times are applied with extreme selectivity. If a person’s ideology is in keeping with the new orthodoxy, they and their work remain unscrutinized. Everyone else lives in fear of the digital thunderdome. Online venom is excused so long as it is directed at the proper targets.   
Op-eds that would have easily been published just two years ago would now get an editor or a writer in serious trouble, if not fired.
* * *
It took the paper two days and two jobs to say that the Tom Cotton op-ed “fell short of our standards.” We attached an editor’s note on a travel story about Jaffa shortly after it was published because it “failed to touch on important aspects of Jaffa’s makeup and its history.” But there is still none appended to Cheryl Strayed’s fawning interview with the writer Alice Walker, a proud anti-Semite who believes in lizard Illuminati.
* * *
The paper of record is, more and more, the record of those living in a distant galaxy, one whose concerns are profoundly removed from the lives of most people. This is a galaxy in which, to choose just a few recent examples, the Soviet space program is lauded for its “diversity”; the doxxing of teenagers in the name of justice is condoned; and the worst caste systems in human history includes the United States alongside Nazi Germany.
This shouldn't really be a surprise to anyone familiar with the Times or for that matter major news, or maybe the media in general. The media has traditionally made at least a pretext at being an honest information broker, but in recent years its departed more and more from this. The New York Times has in fact occasionally been honest about this and actually has flat out states that certain opinions are to be regarded as facts in the Times.

A person doesn't have to be political to see how true this has become. The left has frequently condemned Fox News, which I don't watch, but MSNBC shares the same problems that Fox does in being ideological so that its quality as news must always take that into account. Beyond that, however, its spread to newspapers in a way that is now endemic.

Last year the press here hosted a seminar on the "perception" of press bias. While some outside figures were invited to it, with at least one resigning in disgust as the process went on, the event had the hallmark that all inside "why do they think that" type efforts do. Efforts by lawyers, for example, to address why the public perceives lawyers as self interested threats to societal well being fail to recognize that a large measure of that claim is accurate and not based on a misunderstanding, but experience. The same is true of the perception that the press is often inaccurate and that by and large it has an agenda that's far to the left of the general public's. While that may not show up in a daily paper in every story, there's more than a little truth to it.

Now, this can be taken too far. It isn't the case that the Press was free of bias until recently. Indeed, the phrase "yellow journalism" is an old one and defines a biased sensationalist press. But there was a move towards better reporting from the highly biased papers of the late 19th Century to fairly balanced ones mid 20th Century.

Indeed, the progress, and then the decline, of the Press is highly analogous to the what also occured in the law, which also had an early 20th Century movement to improve the quality of the profession. Both probably reached their high point in that regard mid 20th Century, but following the 1960s a variety of factors operated in the opposite direction, although those factors are not identical for both fields.

One feature of them, however, is that they both are fairly self isolated and their educational foundation is generally slanted to the left. In the case of the Press this is very much the case and it's compounded by the evolution of education in a field which at one time featured a lot of writers with native writing talent, but no advanced education. Having said that, a lot of them did have a higher education as well. The problem is that, just as with law students who entered that intended field prior to law school, their education is often fairly narrow in a field that's extremely broad. Compounding that, as time moved on and technological pressures in the form of competing media came along, specialization in journalism has tended to decline.

Newspapers are now under incredible pressures and many are failing. The internet, which is full of news sources, many of which are self selecting and unreliable, has created an enormous problem for the field. At the same time the leftward drift of the editorial room is driving off readers who aren't in the camp, which in turn is making the editorial room more and more left leaning, but unable to see that.

This doesn't apply to all newspapers, of course. But for major print journals that formerly may have been left of center, but for which there was still room in the center, such as the NYT or The New Republic, the decline really has set in. Unfortunately for these once great journals, they're unlikely to be able to see that.

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

Down to five days


The state's largest newspaper that is.

A lot of papers of a century ago published on a five day schedule, often omitting Sunday and Monday.  But that was at a time when there were no statewide papers, there were two local papers, and the town's population was less than 1/3d of its present number.

It was also, however, a time in which there were no other sources of news.

Now there are, and that's a big problem for print.

The paper did announced that its on line edition will continue to be published seven days a week reflecting, it claims, a shift in reader preference.

It will amplify that preference.  Readers who still subscribe to the paper now will have to subscribe to the online variant if they want news seven days a week, which actually print subscribers can already do, as it includes the online paper.  But you can also subscribe only to the online paper, which many who were teetering on the edge of doing that for a variety of reasons, including simply the costs of the paper, will do. And that will include me.

Sunday, April 19, 2020

Moving stuff around. The Pandemic

Yesterday I posted an item about food and the Pandemic which touched upon distribution systems.  Today I'm posting on distribution systems again, but on a much more localized basis.

I'm talking about the newspaper.



I subscribe to the local newspaper, but as I've noted here several times before, that local paper contracted out the printing of the paper to a printer in Cheyenne.  I don't think that's a good thing, and of course it certainly wasn't a good thing for the printers who lost their jobs. 

Economics was the reason that this occurred.  Local papers are in trouble now days and they're doing what they can to save costs.  It calso can't help but be noted, however, that this pattern follows the American way of doing things.  Consolidation.

Since this occured the promise of the paper, that things would rarely be disrupted, haven't been true.  This past winter has been a long and hard one and delivery of the paper has been frequently disrupted. As this has occurred I've experimented with the online edition of the paper, something that's been amplified by the fact that the time the paper arrives isn't consistent.

Recently, however, I've felt weird about just handling the paper, something that normally I prefer about the print edition over the electronic edition.  That paper comes up from Cheyenne.  Laramie County has double the  number of COVID 19 cases that my county does (Teton County shares that distinction as well). 

I don't know where that paper has been or who has handled it.  It's probably okay, but I'd feel better about it if it wasn't printed in Laramie County, trucked up here, and then distributed here.

I wasn't saying much, well anything, about that at all, but yesterday my wife did. She stated that she felt the paper was "dirty", and I'm afraid in this era I feel that way now too.

So here's another one of those things that is sort of moving.  I'm a fan of print, but will I keep getting the print paper?

And this also shows the weakness of a system that favors efficiency over everything.  A century ago this community was a third of its current size and it had two papers. Yes, it didn't have the Internet, television or even radio at that time.  But it's papers weren't trucked across the state either.  We've lost something in here somewhere.

Thursday, April 16, 2020

April 16, 1920. Carranza seeks to repeat history. . .

by transporting his troops across Texas to go into action in northern Mexico.


It was exactly that action in 1915, which allowed Carranza to transport his troops across Texas to go into action against Poncho Villa's, that lead to the 1916 raid by Villa on Columbus New Mexico.  Villa, not illogically, concluded that the United States should be chastised for intervening in the Mexican civil war in that fashion.


The irony was that Carranza personally disliked the United States and had never been its friend.  Wilson's 1915 action had been a mistake.  Carranza was asking him to repeat it. At the same time, Mexican revolutionaries in Sonora had invaded neighboring Sinola.

It was Arbor Day.

Agriculture Secretary Meredith making the principal address at the Arbor day exercises in Washington D.C.


Wednesday, April 15, 2020

April 15, 1920. Crimes and Revolutions.

Children at the Washington D.C.,Municipal Play Ground at 18th. & Kalorama Road planting a tree in memory of animals killed during World War I during "Be kind to dumb animals" week. The tree was entered on the honor roll of the American Forestry Association.  April 15, 1920

On the front page of the newspapers around the country, the events in Mexico continued to make front page news as Mexico slid back into war with itself.


Also on the front page, the strike in Chicago, which we haven't been addressing, came to an end, as did a local high school student's strike.


Not on the front page of this paper, however, elevator operators were going out on strike. 

This is a nearly extinct occupation, at least in the form which once existed when elevators were mechanically complicated and had to be manually stopped at floors with precision.  W here they exist now, it's mostly as a courtesy of sorts, or as a form of announcing operator, a la Fran Kubelik in The Apartment.

In Braintree Massachusetts a guard and paymaster were murdered in the robbergy of a shoe company.  The murder would ultimately lead to the trial, conviction and execution of anarchist Nicola Sacca and Bartolomeo Vanzetti.

Vanzetti left, Sacca, right.

The trial was tainted by the defendants' anarchism and their status as Italian immigrants and it was accordingly controversial at the time.  Debates about the verdict started nearly immediately and have continued to this day with the result that its now fairly impossible to determine what their status was in regard to the crime, if any.

On this same day Irish Republicans acted to establish their own law enforcement and judicial system in the parts of Ireland they controlled or heavily contested.  Ultimately, 21 of the Irish counties would come to have Republican police and judicial systems and some counties would act to recognize the Irish Republic as the sovereign rather than the crown.


Tuesday, March 31, 2020

March 31, 1920. Hoover reluctantly tosses hat in ring.


Herbert Hoover, on this day in 1920, reluctantly indicated that he'd take the GOP nomination, if it was offered.

In Washington, Congress was continuing on with its investigation into nearly everything concerning the U.S. military and the late war.

On this occasion, Gen. W. W. Harts, currently serving as Chief of Staff of the American occupation forces in Germany, was recalled to Washington to testify concerning charges that military prisons in Paris were cruel during the war.  They had been in his wartime district.

The testimony must have gone okay, as Harts continued on, and to rise, in the Army, retiring in 1930.  He died at age 94 in 1961.

Elsewhere in Washington, government officials were photographed out on the sidewalk in what appeared to be a clear, if perhaps cool, day.

Friday, March 27, 2020

March 27, 1920. Germany's Treaty Violations noted, Borah says something about Wood, maybe.

On this day in 1920 the German civil war in regions left inside the Versailles Treaties prohibition on German military power continued on in rebellion. Both the Ruhr and Westphalia had seen armed worker revolts as a result of the Kapp Putsch and now neither region's labor fighters were willing to stand down and instead were trying to take German in a more leftward direction.  The Allies, however, wouldn't agree to let the German Army in.

On the same day, Germany was found to have violated the Treaty, which in fact was pretty obvious.  Germany had been limited to 204 artillery pieces and was prohibited to have aircraft, but in fact, through the help of the quasi official but technically civilian Freikorps, it had 12,000 artillery pieces and 6,000 aircraft.

The size limitations placed on the German military were never realistic, no matter what a person otherwise thinks of the Versailles Treaty. Indeed, the Weimar Republic had no choice but to violate them.  Realistically, the only alternative the Allies had to allowing Germany to have a fairly sizable military would have been to actually occupy the country, as it did following World War Two.  As it was, Germany was left a functioning, albeit barely, republican state that had to contend with internal revolution as well as a very unstable situation in the immediate post war world to its east.  Those concerns practically necessitated the retention of artillery and aircraft.

Their prohibition and the very early incentive to avoid that prohibition, which in part was done through the reliance on right wing monarchical militias help fuel a sense of resentment in the military which would later help bring about the Second World War.  It was certainly not solely responsible for it by any means, but it was an element of that.

On the same day the Cheyenne State Leader opted for a nearly nonsensical primary election headline.


Apparently that meant that highly respected Senator Borah of Idaho was taking some swipes at leading GOP Presidential contender, General Leonard Wood.

Elsewhere, on this Saturday, people went shopping.


Tuesday, March 10, 2020

March 10, 1920. Border Trouble. Harding runs.


It read like papers a decade prior, trouble on the border.

And, while we haven't been covering it much, there was plenty of ongoing trouble in Mexico.  Woodrow Wilson may have declared Carranza the legitimate head of state, but there were still armed contestants on that claim and they were pretty active.  For that matter, Carranza's regime was shaky internally.  Mexico remained troubling and in trouble.

And Senator Harding  of Ohio was entering the fray. . .



He actually already had, but after New Hampshire, where Gen. Leonard Wood had taken the first victory of the season, Harding was in the west, in Denver specifically, drawing attention to his campaign.

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

The Test Drive


Not as satisfying, in some way, as the print edition, but I actually read more of it, and with breakfast, which is how I like to read the paper.

And it was ready well over 1.5 hours before the print one showed up this morning.

________________________________________________________________________________

Related threads:

Giving up on the print edition

Monday, February 17, 2020

Giving up on the print edition


When the local paper moved to a location 150 miles away for printing, I knew that there's be delivery disruptions. . .


frequently.


The paper insisted they'd be rare.  But that was optomistic.


This winter has proven me quite correct.  There's been a lot of days when the paper simply didn't make it here.


And if it didn't make it here, I can only imagine what it must be like in areas to the north of here.  After all, there's more or less a straight shot between the city of publication and the city, ours, whose name appears on their masthead.


And its become very expensive.


As a subscriber, I'm entitled to use their on line version, but I haven't liked it. Or I thought I didn't.


But then I learned just the other day, from a friend who only subscribes to the on line version and reads it on an Ipad, that in actually a setting allowed it to appear larger.


Well, that version gets here reliably, electronically, every day.


And its cheaper.


So, with some reluctance, I'm going to go with that next time my subscription comes up.


Which frankly seems to me to make the paper less viable long term.  But with the expense, and frequent road closures, well. . .