Steve Millies
The theme I see in a lot of clerical #Catholic comment on the #synod is—'Who are all these laypeople and why do they think they get a voice in *my* church?'
Oh, bull. I haven't been hearing that at all.
Quite the contrary, in facdt.
Apparently, I'd note, I’m not the only one either:
Fr. Joseph Krupp@Joeinblack
So weird. I follow almost 800 priests, and not one of them has said anything remotely like that.
Mostly, we worry about how to deal with the increasingly large piles of demands on us.
We worry because everyone is an expert on our job, but most are only willing to help if they…
Show more
In six decades now of attending Mass, I can't think of a single instance in which I've personally heard a priest openly criticize a Bishop or the Pope, although I'm sure they didn't always agree with them. They simply obeyed and did their duties. This would include not only the Pope Francis era, but the real "spirit of Vatican II" disruption of the 70s.
All of the criticism of Bishops and Popes I've heard have come from the laity, and it tended as a rule to object to reforms. Even the mantillas I am now seeing for the first time in sizable numbers being worn by young women are a form of protest in a way. The point is that a lot of "the voice of the laity is being ignored" doesn't come from the class under age 40, really, whose, but from the Western middle-aged and old.
Mr. Millies is, I'd note, a Professor of Public theology who was born in 1972. That makes him nine years younger than me, or 51 years of age. He's not a Baby Boomer, the generation that's most frequently picked on here, but he's not a kid either.
The young church might not really be the voice that people 50 years old and up really want to hear, as it might look like a voice that actually is more from the lost past that the dying post Boomer present.
On assessing the voice of the parish, moreover, every parish I've ever been to worked desperately to do that, usually unsuccessfully, in trying to get the rank and file of the parish to express their voice and to come to thins other than Mass. As I've noted, this has been, in my experience, uniformly unsuccessful.
Which takes us to this.
Also on Twitter, one Canadian Catholic commentator, D.W. Lafferty replied to another person's credulity regarding assessing the views at the parish level in an interesting fashion. That post noted:
Apparently, "synodality" is just a euphemism for "a discussion group in the church basement." Huh. twitter.com/rightscholar/s…
Lafferty replied:
That's where it can start, for sure. It's the simplest thing in the world to have people in a parish get together to talk and listen. Might cost a few bucks for coffee and donuts. If we can't pull that off, what are we even doing?
And, similarly:
How much does it cost to have a discussion group in the church basement? Or to have a volunteer take notes and produce a synthesis? Cost is not the problem. Lack of interest and motivation on the part of many pastors is the problem.
And here we meet the academic in academia, rather than the regular person in the pews.
I've served on a parish council. I didn't ask to run for the position, but received anonymous nominations three times. I rejected the first two, as I’m not a joiner, and I'm busy. Finally, the third time, I felt compelled and served for several years.
I've also been on a professional board. Same thing. I didn't volunteer, I was asked to serve.
And I once served in a professional role that was, well professional, the same way. Asked to serve.
The point?
Well, I’m an introvert. I have opinions on everything, but only very rarely will I cause myself to attend something. I will, but it's rare. Most of the time I've had public roles in anything, I was volunteered, and at least some of the time, I declined.
No comments:
Post a Comment