Thursday, February 20, 2014

Friday, February 20, 1914. Revolutionary execution.

William S. Benton, a British rancher with Chihuahua holdings, was executed in Juarez by Villistas, after a "court-martial".  He was accused of making an attempt on Villa's life, but his associates claimed he had no views on the Mexican Revolution at all. 

More on this from a Scottish blog:

Pancho Villa murders Keig man

Rosa Luxemburg was tried in a Frankfurt court on charges of encouraging public disobedience and sentenced to a year in prison.  In the Court she stated.

When, as I say, the majority of people come to the conclusion that wars are nothing but a barbaric, unsocial, reactionary phenomenon, entirely against the interests of the people, then wars will have become impossible.

Nice sentiment, but shallow thought.

Luxemburg herself has always struck me as not being too deep. Perhaps I'm wrong as she remains the deluded darling of the far left, and maybe there's more to her than my very limited knowledge is aware of.

James William Humphyrs Scotland made the first cross-country flight in New Zealand.  On the same day, Winston Churchill, serving as First Lord of the Admiralty, flew as a passenger in a Sopwith Sociable.

Panama-Pacific International Exposition, Feb. 20, 1914, one year before opening day. San Francisco.

Legal, Alberta, was founded.

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

On Line Dating: Are we really that busy?

This morning, on my way to work, I was listening to XM Radio when an advertisement came on advertising an on line dating service for busy professionals.  The pitch was that they were too busy to get to know anyone, so the service had done all the heavy lifting for them.

Seriously?  Are people now so busy that they can't get to know anybody?

If that's true, that's a horrible sign of something seriously amiss in our society.  If people are now so busy, they can't even get to know a potential spouse in any sort of conventional way, our society is pretty much doomed.

People are busy, grant it.  But at some point certain things are like canaries in coal mines.  And if this is actually the case (and I hope its' not) its like a flock of canaries dropping dead all over the coal mine floor. 

Occupational Identity

According to psychologists, males (but not females) acquire an "occupational identity" as adults.  If they fail to do so, supposedly, it's actually supposed to be a problem for the adult male.

I don't know about that, but I do know that males very strongly catalog people by occupations. One of the first things that males do, if they do not know each other, but are engaged in a conversation, is to ask each other "so, what do you do?"  Casual male acquaintances usually also get around to asking, "so, how are things at work?"  Only men who very deeply know one another will skip the work questions, usually.

I note this as I recently had an odd experience, although its frankly one that I've had in the past as well.

I called a person who is in the business of selling a certain item to ask about an example of it that I had heard, outside of work, that was coming up for sale.  I could tell this person was struggling to place me in context, when suddenly he said "Oh!  You are the lawyer!"  Not only was it like turning on a switch for him, it also told me nearly immediately I wasn't going to be treated seriously.

That may sound odd, but certain professions are not taken seriously in regards to certain things.  If, for example, a neurosurgeon went into a used car shop to ask about a beat up Volkswagen, he's not going to be taken seriously.

Here, the item that was going up for sale wasn't for sale just yet, but it was going to be that week.  I asked this person to call me back as soon as it was listed.  He said he would.

He didn't.

A client of mine, who is in the business that this thing pertains to, is now going to buy it and called me for help on that.  Of course, I'll help.  But how frustrating.

I've encountered this before.  Years and years ago there was some grazing land that was somewhat tempting up for sale around here, and I called the listing agent and the agent never was able to figure out what I was asking about.  He kept coming back to me with palatial mountain retreats.  In his mind, that must be what I was wanting to buy.  I finally gave up on him.

Or, in another instance, I once called a seller about something and left a message.  I didn't hear back and didn't hear back. Finally, I called again, and he told me "oh. . . you wouldn't want it, it wouldn't interest a lawyer."  Oh?  Then why had I called about buying it in the first place?  Geez.

In another instance, a rancher friend of mine had an early model Power Wagon which I very much admired.  He knew that.  He decided to sell it, and never told me.  Why? Well, it just isn't the sort of thing he could have seen me wanting.  By the same token, I'll admit, I once had a muscle car that I sold and later heard from his wife who complained that had she known I was going to sell it, she would have bought it.  I just didn't see that being something she would have wanted.

I don't know what the point of this is, but I guess it's just an interesting observation about how we pigeonhole things.  There's no reason that an oilfield worker wouldn't want season tickets at the Met, but I bet they'd have a  hard time getting them.  Assumptions. . .

Implements of the transportation revolution: Riker Truck


Riker truck being delivered to the U.S. Army, for use in the Punitive Expedition.


Mid Week At Work: Military service and jobs gone by.


Historialliset lentokoneet virtuaalikuvina (Warbirds)

Historialliset lentokoneet virtuaalikuvina



Neat Finish aircraft site.

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Wednesday, February 18, 1914. Insuring Villa and The Tennessee Walz.

Pancho Villa insured his life for $500,000 as a favor of his wife.  That was a huge sum at the time.

Pee Wee King, co-writer of the classic Tennessee Waltz, was born.


King died in 2000 at the age of 86.

Monday, February 17, 2014

Second Story Radio • Episode 5 - The Perspective of Stuff

Second Story Radio • Episode 5 - The Perspective of Stuff

Old Picture of the Day: Car Dealership

Old Picture of the Day: Car Dealership: We wrap up Denver Week with this picture of a Car Dealership. The picture was taken in about 1900. The dealership was for the Felken Cy...

Old Picture of the Day: Express Wagon

Old Picture of the Day: Express Wagon: Today's picture is from about 1870, and shows a great scene in Denver that could be right out of a Western. The picture shows an E...

Old Picture of the Day: Horse Trolley

Old Picture of the Day: Horse Trolley: Denver week continues with this peculiar picture from 1903 of a horse-drawn trolley. The unusual thing is that the horse is riding, no...

Old Picture of the Day: Denver Stockyards

Old Picture of the Day: Denver Stockyards: Today's picture shows Cattle Buyers at the Denver Stockyards. The picture was taken in 1939. These buyers would be buying for the p...

Old Picture of the Day: Denver Train Station

Old Picture of the Day: Denver Train Station: Today's picture shows a scene from the Denver train station. The picture was taken in 1903. People dressed in grand style back then...

Old Picture of the Day: Dallas Cowboy

Old Picture of the Day: Dallas Cowboy: Welcome to Dallas Texas Week here at OPOD. We will be looking at pictures from times gone by of this great city. We start with this pi...

The Big Picture: Mt. Ranier, 1907


Sunday, February 16, 2014

Second Story Radio • This past summer was the Lincoln Highway’s...

Second Story Radio • This past summer was the Lincoln Highway’s...

Friday, February 14, 1914. Concerned farmers.

Protesting Swedish peasants.

Concerned Swedish farmers gathered in the courtyard of Stockholm Place to demand higher defense spending.  There were 32,000 of them.  King Gustaf declared to them that he shared their concerns, violating the Swedish constitution by taking an issue in a partisan matter. Conservatives supported higher defense spending and had organized the protest against the sitting Liberal government.  The resulting controversy resulted in the downfall of the leadership of the Swedish government and the appointment of a government approved of by the King.


Gustav was king from 1907 until his death in 1950.  Up until World War One he still held significant power in the country, and was highly influential in the Swedish government during the war. After the war, parliamentary actions would end up stripping the crown of them.  He was the last Swedish monarch to exercise royal prerogatives, and 1974 constitutional changes ended them.

Gustav was pro German and anti Communist during the war and after.  During World War Two, he had to be stopped by the Swedish prime minister from sending a congratulatory letter to Hitler for invading the Soviet Union.  He nonetheless on behalf of tennis Davis Cup stars Jean Borotra of France and his personal trainer and friend Baron Gottfried von Cramm of Germany for better treatment by the Nazis, the latter of which had been imprisoned on the charge of a homosexual relationship with a Jew.  Gustav himself was an ardent tennis player.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Random Snippets: Toyota Pickup Trucks.

Has anyone else noticed that Toyota pickup trucks seem to be the prime mover of every third world irregular army on the planet?

Friday, February 14, 2014

ABA President Silkenat: America's legal response to gun violence is unacceptable

ABA President Silkenat: America's legal response to gun violence is unacceptable

Which shows just how far the ABA has strayed from its original mission, and how whopping irrelevant it now is to the lives of average lawyers.

The ABA started off as a (conservative) organization seeking to regulate the unrestricted practice of law.  It was concerned that the rough and tumble nature of the practice, which had existed in its frontier regions from nearly day one, lead to be the law being regarded with disdain. It sought to elevate the practice, and actually to boost its esteem to the level of physicians.  As part of that, it emphasized professionalism, and it came to also review Federal judicial nominees and rate law schools.

Well, just like other organizations, it's in decline.  Part of this is for the same reasons fraternal organizations are in decline (see also the recent post on the Boy Scouts).  Part of it is also for the reasons that labor unions are in decline.  The ABA achieved what it sought to do many, many year ago. So it isn't really needed to achieve htat goal, only to maintain it.

But organizations that started off with a cause rarely disband when the cause is achieved. They just move on to a new one, and that's what the ABA has done.  It's morphed from a conservative organization concerned with practice standards, to one which is now a liberal organization ready to espouse liberal causes.

The problem with that is that a political cause is a political cause, and most legal practitioners are working in the nuts and bolts of the law.  Practitioners are more concerned with developments in tort law, criminal law, civil procedure, and the like.  As for social causes, lawyers have their own views like everyone else.  Some of those views are grounded in legal interpretation, some in social views, and some in emotion.

Hopefully lawyers involved in social causes, and more particularly legal organizations involved in them, do try to keep the law in mind, but here the ABA is frankly just out to lunch.  A person can argue one way or another about gun control, but a legal organization that argues about it should keep the law in mind, and either accept it or argue that it, and by it we have to mean the Constitution here, be changed.  It's weak legal reasoning to argue that a strained reading of the Constitution ought to be the approach taken.

Beyond that, frankly this is a policy issue that has nothing really to do with the law as law.  Lawyers don't have much business saying "I'm a lawyer, and therefore I know that this should be the policy."  And this has nothing to do with what almost every lawyer in the US actually does for a living.

Lex Anteinternet: The 1918-1919 Influenza Epidemic

A while back I blogged about the  Lex Anteinternet: The 1918-1919 Influenza Epidemic: I was reminded of that as the flu, the real deal, not some bad cold that people mistake for the flu, has really been going around recently.  All sorts of people have it.



It's going through NCHS like there's no tomorrow.  At least three members of the swim team have it, including my son.  And its a nasty H1N1 variant.



H1N1 is bad, but it's not anything like the 1918 flu, which was a H5 variant.  Be that as it may, things like this really demonstrate to me how vulnerable to the flu or something like it we are.  I'll fly down to Denver today. So far, I haven't had the flu, and I haven't felt like I was getting it, although I'm coughing slightly this morning.  I've clearly been exposed to the flu here at home.  And at work where at least a couple of the people have had it recently. And I was at a meeting recently where a person was about two weeks out from it, no doubt over the flu, but still suffering from its effects. 



My point is that the 1918 flu managed to go clean across the globe with no difficult, over about a two year time span.  By that time, however, humans as a species would have had a little time for our own natures to begin to evolve where exposures had occurred, and we would have had some time to prepare where it had not immediately hit.  World War One helped spread it around, but at that time it was still the case that transoceanic travel moved no faster than ships.  That's certainly not the case now. A flu outbreak could be everywhere before we even knew it was an outbreak.