The movie Kitty Foyle was released, which had the byproduct of popularizing the Kitty Foyle Dress.
You can also read about that event here:
Ostensibly exploring the practice of law before the internet. Heck, before good highways for that matter.
The movie Kitty Foyle was released, which had the byproduct of popularizing the Kitty Foyle Dress.
You can also read about that event here:
The best posts of December 20, 2020
1920 was a banner year for women and we've posted a lot of magazine covers that dealt with that. We missed the one above from July, 1920, however.
Magazine illustrations of the period, we'd note, were really art. That's something that's really been lost in the past century.
The thought of Liberty calling on an old style rotary dial phone is a bit odd. Not one of the better posters of the Great War.
not because I'm a golf fan. I'm not (and yes, I do know how to play it).
I love these ear muffs.
Now there were shepherds in that region living in the fields and
keeping the night watch over their flock. The angel of the Lord appeared to them and the glory of the Lord
shone around them, and they were struck with great fear.
The angel said to them, “Do not be afraid; for behold, I proclaim
to you good news of great joy that will be for all the people.For
today in the city of David a savior has been born for you who is Messiah and
Lord. And this will be a sign for you: you will find an infant wrapped
in swaddling clothes and lying in a manger.”
And suddenly there was a multitude of the heavenly host with the
angel, praising God and saying: “Glory to God in the highest fand on earth peace
to those on whom his favor rests.”
When the angels went away from them to heaven, the shepherds said
to one another, “Let us go, then, to Bethlehem to see this thing that has taken
place, which the Lord has made known to us.”
So they went in haste and found Mary and Joseph, and the infant
lying in the manger.
When they saw this, they made known the message that had been told
them about this child. All who heard it were amazed by
what had been told them by the shepherds.
And Mary kept all these things, reflecting on them in her heart.
Then the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all they had heard and seen, just as it had been told to them.
Καὶ ποιμένες ἦσαν ἐν τῇ χώρᾳ τῇ αὐτῇ ἀγραυλοῦντες καὶ φυλάσσοντες
φυλακὰς τῆς νυκτὸς ἐπὶ τὴν ποίμνην αὐτῶν. Καὶ ἄγγελος κυρίου ἐπέστη αὐτοῖς, καὶ
δόξα κυρίου περιέλαμψεν αὐτούς• καὶ ἐφοβήθησαν φόβον μέγαν. Καὶ εἶπεν αὐτοῖς ὁ ἄγγελος,
Μὴ φοβεῖσθε• ἰδοὺ γάρ, εὐαγγελίζομαι ὑμῖν χαρὰν μεγάλην, ἥτις ἔσται παντὶ τῷ λαῷὅτι
ἐτέχθη ὑμῖν σήμερον σωτήρ, ὅς ἐστιν χριστὸς κύριος, ἐν πόλει Δαυίδ. Καὶ τοῦτο ὑμῖν
τὸ σημεῖον• εὑρήσετε βρέφος ἐσπαργανωμένον, καὶ κείμενον ἐν φάτνῃ. Καὶ ἐξαίφνης
ἐγένετο σὺν τῷ ἀγγέλῳ πλῆθος στρατιᾶς οὐρανίου, αἰνούντων τὸν θεόν, καὶ λεγόντων,
Δόξα ἐν ὑψίστοις θεῷ, καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς εἰρήνη• ἐν ἀνθρώποις εὐδοκία. Καὶ ἐγένετο, ὡς
ἀπῆλθον ἀπ' αὐτῶν εἰς τὸν οὐρανὸν οἱ ἄγγελοι, οἱ ποιμένες ἐλάλουν πρὸς ἀλλήλους,
Διέλθωμεν δὴ ἕως Βηθλέεμ, καὶ ἴδωμεν τὸ ῥῆμα τοῦτο τὸ γεγονός, ὃ ὁ κύριος ἐγνώρισεν
ἡμῖν. Καὶ ἦλθαν σπεύσαντες, καὶ ἀνεῦραν τήν τε Μαριὰμ καὶ τὸν Ἰωσήφ, καὶ τὸ βρέφος
κείμενον ἐν τῇ φάτνῃἸδόντες δὲ διεγνώρισαν περὶ τοῦ ῥήματος τοῦ λαληθέντος αὐτοῖς
περὶ τοῦ παιδίου τούτου. Καὶ πάντες οἱ ἀκούσαντες ἐθαύμασαν περὶ τῶν λαληθέντων
ὑπὸ τῶν ποιμένων πρὸς αὐτούς. Ἡ δὲ Μαριὰμ πάντα συνετήρει τὰ ῥήματα ταῦτα, συμβάλλουσα
ἐν τῇ καρδίᾳ αὐτῆς. Καὶ ὑπέστρεψαν οἱ ποιμένες, δοξάζοντες καὶ αἰνοῦντες τὸν θεὸν
ἐπὶ πᾶσιν οἷς ἤκουσαν καὶ εἶδον, καθὼς ἐλαλήθη πρὸς αὐτούς.
Then, as now, some people work on Christmas Day, and that included this group of Dominican National Guardsmen who were lined up for chow.
The Dominican Republic was under American occupation, which had been a campaign issue in the 1920 election. William Harding was opposed to continuing the occupation, as were most Americans. Be that as it may, it would take some time to wind it down and during that time, as this photograph makes clear, the National Guard was very much under American influence.
The Canadian Corps came into existence in the United Kingdom on this day in 1940. The Corps represented the Canadian effort in the Commonwealth struggle in Europe against the Germans and Italians. It would exist until April 1942 when the First Canadian Army was formed, with the corps being a unit within it.
Germany and the UK observed an unofficial two day Christmas truce starting on this day in 1940.
Gandhi wrote a letter to Hitler urging him to stop the war and put his complaints to an international tribunal.
Other events in the war:
On this day in 1920 Italy began its military occupation of Fiume.
The spat over Fiume is almost incomprehensible today, featuring an effort by Italian patriots to seize the city for Italy in spite of it having a mixed population. 62% of the town's residents were, however, of Italian ethnicity. Italy negotiated around the problem of the city and it became a "free city" as a result, with the accompanying result being that the Italian leaders within the city declared war on Italy, a moronic move under the circumstances. On this day the Italians, who had enough of it, started to occupy the city leading to what was called "Bloody Christmas" as the occupation did result in some loss of life.
Today the city is known as Rijeka and is in Croatia.
On the same day, Enrico Caruso gave his last public performance at the Met in New York.
The 48 year old Caruso was not well and would die that following August.
Elsewhere, the day before Christmas looked much like it normally does.
On this day in 1940, a photo was taken of some new construction benefiting aircraft at a Naval Air Station in Rhode Island.
On the same day, famous aviator August Eddie Schneider was killed in an aviation accident.
Schneider was a well known daring aviator and had won multiple aviation speed records. He'd also flown for the Republicans during the Spanish Civil War. On this day he was training a student when his plane was struck by a Navy aircraft, taking it down and killing him.
And of course the war raged on:
On this day in the war, Winston Churchill addressed the Italian people and urged them to rebel against Mussolini and take Italy out of the war. The overall poor performance of Italian troops in combat was already effectively achieving that result.
I deplore the campaign of violence and outrage, whereby a small section of my subjects seek to sever Ireland from the empire, and I sympathize with the loyal servants of the crown who are endeavoring to restore peace and maintain order under conditions of unexampled difficulty and danger... I sincerely hope that this act, the fruit of more than thirty years of ceaseless controversy, will finally bring about unity and friendship between all the peoples of my kingdom.
The King's hopes were well wished, but things were now too out of hand and it was simply too late.
On the same day, a couple of people at the American Forestry Association decided to put out a display.
Denver has renamed Columbus Park "La Raza Park".
Because, as we know, Christopher Columbus was a racist colonizer.
La Raza, we're informed, is a name that has all positive connotations for Hispanics of all ethnicities.
It translates as "the race".
Now, in using that term, we need to be careful. Many people if they called themselves "the race" would be using a term that would be, after all, racist. Particularly if you were using a term associated with a racist colonial endeavor.
Christopher Columbus, as we know, was a racist colonizer.
He was working for the King and Queen of Spain. . . who were Hispanics. . . and whose Spanish conquest created . . . well. . . "the race".
So, Denver, in an effort to be culturally pure has taken away from a park the name of an Italian contractor with the Hispanic crown and renamed the park for the results of his work, in actual terms.
Things get complicated when you seek to be woke.
This is a follow-up item from one of our companion blogs.
Churches of the West: Churches of the West: On the morality of the Coronavirus:Churches of the West: On the morality of the Coronavirus Vaccines.
In what should put this matter to rest, the Vatican indicated that the vaccines are not morally objectionable.Churches of the West: On the morality of the Coronavirus Vaccines.: This is something that you have to be pretty attuned, I think, to the Catholic world to pick up on, and to appreciate. There's been som...For most rank and file orthodox Catholics this will in fact be the end of this debate, but my prediction is that for some it will not for some Rad Trads who have headed off in the Dr. Taylor Marshall/Patrick Coffin direction.
Indeed, while I'm not following either of them, I'm skeptical that they'll accord Pope Francis the respect and authority here which loyal Catholics should.
I don't post much on these topics here and they're really only of interest to those in the Catholic, and perhaps Orthodox, world, but there's a certain segment of Rad Trads that have become so dedicated in their opposition to Pope Francis that they ironically have started to resemble the most anti Catholic Protestants in some odd ways, without realizing it.
They are also adopting, in some instances, political and scientific views that really ought to stop and give a person pause. This sort of thing has happened before and usually ends up with Papal correction and then ultimately the movement being forgotten, or an unfortunate example that we wish we could all in fact forget.
Which gets to the interesting topic of analysis and nuance.
It's perfectly possible to be extremely orthodox and not a Pope Francis fan, without being disrespectful to him or his office or, moreover, assert that he must be wrong on whatever he's saying because he's Pope Francis.
Likewise, it's possible to be very conservative socially and politically without believing that the recent election was stolen or that any effort is worth it to retain the current sitting President. By the same token, a person can believe that the President Elect is in fact the President Elect, support him as such, while not feel that he personally isn't in need of serious correction in some areas.
The world doesn't divide into all good and all evil, and very few people have actions that are universally one or the other. And endorsing something that we'd normally regard as wrong, because our opponent has endorsed it, should cause us serious pause. So should leaping to conclusions about causes and origins, and motivations.
We all agree that the World War One was horrific. Few, at any point, would have maintained that the 1918 Flu was a German plot, however. Patrick Coffin likes to call SARS-CoV-2, or as most call it COVID 19, the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Flu, or words to that effect. There's no reason on earth that the Chinese would have unleashed this intentionally on anyone, let alone themselves, but some tend to insist upon that.
More extreme, Coffin's given voice to at least one person who has maintained, although he has stopped short of endorsing it himself, that the pandemic was unleashed in league with the Chinese by Bill Gates and his associates as part of an effort to achieve something, although what that would be is pretty unclear. As I don't listen to Coffin, I might know the answer to that if I followed up on it.
Dr. Taylor Marshall, who has made a name for himself as a highly traditional Catholic, beyond that which most conventional orthodox Catholics would be regarded as, has spent some time post election on the various wild ways in which Donald Trump could still be elected President. Never mind that Marshall is highly educated, holding a doctorate, and should have realized that these theories were absurd and that it was immediately clear that the focus for Catholics should be our moral views in regard to the upcoming administration.
I don't like Noam Chomsky's views.
That is, his political views.
But as whacky screwball as they are, and they're so far to the left they're in the Squirrel Nut Zipper category, he's notable for having supported his political enemies in academic positions as he thought they were good academics. And that is what makes Chomsky a serious academic himself.
That sort of conduct is always somewhat rare. But in the era we're now in its become absurdly rare. Indeed, it's becoming the culture of the country.
And countries with that culture fly apart.
That is, exactly 400 years ago.
The landing was partially precipitated by the fact that the Mayflower had run out of beer, which was a more important matter than it might sound. The English were overall used to drinking beer, but the reason was that beer, because of the way that it was made, was safe to drink. Running out of things to drink is bad anyway you look at it.
In modern times its become common to levy all sort of criticism and virtue signaling on this event, noting how "horrible" Europeans were for colonizing North America. All of that views the world from was the comfortable late 20th and early 21st Century prospective which has only been shook up a little by the visitation of a plague upon is, something that people in the 17th Century regarded as one of life's norms. It is true, of course, that the Mayflower passengers were essentially landing where they weren't invited to take land that wasn't theirs, but they didn't see it that way. And its important to remember that the native residents of the land that they were essentially if unknowingly invading viewed the world much differently than anyone in North America does today, through eyes that tended to regard their own tribes as "the people" with everyone else being some sort of alien people.
Indeed, the Mayflower passengers were only in possession of marginally technically superior implements than their unwilling hosts, who themselves were a more or less constant state of war, near war, or soon to be war, with their neighbors. It's not true, as some have suggested as a reactionary counterfactual, that the Europeans were regarded as one more tribe. They were definitely different. But early on the technological advantage that's so often assumed to be there simply wasn't. In warfare the natives were every bit the equals, and maybe the superiors in every sense to the new arrivals.
And none of this is to suggest the old grade school version of the "pilgrims" either. They were religious bigots whose situation was brought about by the fact that they couldn't get along at all with the Church of England or darned near anyone else. They would have regarded Catholics, which all the British had been less than a century ago, as heretics and they didn't view the Church of England cheerfully. They had adopted very rigorous concepts of Calvinism and regarded most people damned by God to Hell from the moment of their conception, a novelty that no Christian had held before the Reformation. Our concept of them and what they approved of and didn't approve of is accordingly massively off the mark. They approved of piety, but because it was temporal proof of their predestination. As noted, unlike many who look back to them now as religious ancestors, they approved of alcohol as well. They were also huge supporters of marital sex, which is something we don't associate their piety with.
They disapproved of most forms of entertainment, which was another thing that had gotten them in trouble in Europe. They required church attendance on Sunday by law, but then that was also a legal norm in much of Europe. They'd approved of the Calvinist ban of sports on Sunday in England during the Cromwell era.
Not everyone on board the Mayflower was a member of their group by any means. Indeed, the "pilgrim" passengers. The ship held 102 passengers but some were just that, not religious dissenters. Be that as it may, the puritans dominated the ship in culture and conduct, and as colonist.
Their journey was no doubt arduous, and coming in winter, risky in more ways than one. One person died on the way, and another was born.
I personally have no known connection with them. The first of my ancestors to set sail across the Atlantic for the New World left from Normandy, not Holland, and arrived in Quebec, not New England. I'm completely comfortable with that. But my much more American by ancestry wife has a demonstrated ancestral connection with the 102 passengers of the Mayflower but, as her curiosity on historical matters is much lower than mine, if I asked her right now who it was, she wouldn't recall, and wouldn't be interested in looking it up. Still, that means my two children likewise have ancestors who landed at Plymouth Rock in 1620.
And its important to note, that really was something, no matter how human or failed those people may have been. I can't say, as I look around, that people are doing much better in any segment of human conduct today.
Joe Biden will not, I'm sure, take advice from me. I've offered him some already, but I doubt he's one of the 200 to 800 people who stop in here on any particular day.
Still, if he is. . .
If you want to read an enthusiastic view of the Space Force read the Smithsonian's Air & Space magazine. It's an excellent publication anyway and it loves the space force. The last issue had an article on the "black hat squadron" of the now one year old Space Force and what it does.
My view?
M'eh.
The Space Force was basically the Air Force's Space Command and it should revert to it. The Space Force can't and won't be doing any real mission that Space Command was not, but it will have its own budget, its own seat at the Joint Chiefs, and its own bloated budget. Given the habit of the current U.S. military, it won't share anything that it could in terms of obviously common items with the other services, and will have to have its own unique everything.
The Space Force/Space Command really has a mission that's simply auxiliary to the Air Forces and therefore the creation of what essentially is a branch of the military that does nothing other than to deal with menacing Russian satellites and the potential militarization of space is really grossly overweighting that mission and massively trespassing on something the Air Force already does and does well. The Air Force has been in space, frankly, in a militarized way since the launch of the first ballistic missiles that excited the atmosphere and so they've been at this a long, long time. If the Space Force having a seat at the Joint Chiefs makes sense, and its own very special budget, giving the Civil Air Patrol a seat there does as well.
Moreover both balkanization and mission inflation is a problem in the U.S. military as it is. The Air Force itself was once, and rightly, part of the Army but has been busy trying to forget its ground support role ever since it became a separate service, which was a massive military mistake in the first place. Double balkanization of a role that should have just remained with the Army is not help.
Moreover, this recalls the example of the Marine Corps, which I have another thread in the hopper on. I'm not opposed to the Marine Corps by any means and I worry about its current direction towards a new role, but its hard not to recall that the Marine Corps is properly part of the Department of the Navy but since the Second World War its freakishly expanded into its own service in a way. And its one that has developed the habit of never using anything, right down to boots, that other branches of the service do.
All these services, moreover, get a chair with the Joint Chiefs of Staff which now is starting to look as large as a high school graduating class. The Army, Air Force, Space Force, Marine Corps, and the Navy all have seats at the Joint Chiefs and the National Guard gets its own as well.
This is now way overdone. The Marines ought to really revert fully to being part of the Department of the Navy. If they can't do that, they're really just a second Army in disguise. The Air Force ought to revert to being part of the Department of the Army. I'm so so about the National Guard having a seat at the table, but I'd leave that alone for the time being.
At a bare minimum, the Space Force ought to go and on day one of the Biden Administration. If I were he, I'd not only sign an executive order doing away with it immediately on day one, but I'd frankly reduce any officer in grade by one grade if they were foolish enough to go along with this silliness and I'd shift those enlisted men who volunteered for this transfer (and not all of them did) over to the Army rather than the Air Force. They'd have their same jobs, but if they want to be playing musical services they can be in one that might, perhaps, have to call on them to be a "guardian" in the old fashioned way.