Tea brought into the harbor at York harbor was seized by men dressed as Native Americans from the vessel that brought it in, but it was not destroyed. Indeed, the protest having been made, the tea was quietly returned.
Last edition:
Ostensibly exploring the practice of law before the internet. Heck, before good highways for that matter.
Tea brought into the harbor at York harbor was seized by men dressed as Native Americans from the vessel that brought it in, but it was not destroyed. Indeed, the protest having been made, the tea was quietly returned.
Last edition:
The territorial Grey League in Switzerland formed a constitution, the Bundesbrief
Last edition:
The third worst typhoon to hit Hong Kong hit on the night of September 22, 1874.
Up to 2,000 people died in Hong Kong, and in nearby China, between 10,000 and 100,000 people lost their lives.
Last edition:
I am tired of hearing from people who cannot point out Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala on a map telling us how to mitigate the millions seeking refuge.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Which is absurd.
They're asking for real M4 carbines, which they should get.
But it also raises this question.
Why doesn't the Air Force simply use the Army for basic training? The Marines send their artillerymen to Ft. Sill for artillery training from the Army. Everyone uses the Air Force for training in dog handling.
Each service has its own requirements, but basic training conveys basic soldierly skills. Granted, the Air Force is unique from the Army, but in regard to basic training, not that unique. And after all, the Army did provide basic training to the U.S. Army Air Corps prior to the Air Force existing, and enlisted Marines in the Marine Corps' aviation branch go through regular Marine Corps basic training.
It's not as if this would save piles of money, but it would save some, and do away with some needless duplication here.
Estonians, some in the Red Army, and some in German Estonian units, others in Waffen SS units fought each other at Porkuni.
The Red Army units prevailed.
This presents the complicated picture of the war in the Baltics. The Soviets were widely disposed by most residents of the Baltic States, but there were, and always had been, Baltic communists who saw the Soviet Union as an ally. Estonian resistance to Soviet occupation, on the other hand, had started with the pre World War Two Soviet invasion and continued on after World War Two in the form of the Estonian Forest Brothers.
The Germans had never desired any sort of independence for Estonia and had not supported it in any sense.
Interestingly, during the war, Finland never came into play in this even though the Estonians are a Baltic Finnic people and in the 1920s there had been serious considerations given to an Estonian Finnish union, with such efforts being committedly opposed by the Soviets. The East Karelian Uprising of 1921-22 fit into this, as that territory lay between the two nations to some degree and was occupied by Finnic people as well.
The Battle of Rimini ended in a Canadian, Greek and New Zealander victory.
The Satsuki was sunk by US aircraft in Manila Bay.
The Cardinals took the National League Pennant for the third time in a row, defeating the Boston Braves.
Last edition:
I recently noted, after the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump, a group of folks I know posting prayers for Donald Trump.
I've noted this before.
In this instance, I post the example below.
Now, let me start off by noting, that praying for anyone, particularly those in some kind of danger, distress, or bad situation, is a Christian thing to do, and should be done. That's not the point here.
What is, is the adoption by some Christians, and more particularly by some Catholics, of the concept of Trump as a Christian warrior, is badly misbegotten. The "Cause his enemies to stumble and fall into confusion and panic" line is particularly worrisome. Indeed, if he were granted "clarity", it seems to me that he'd have to spend darned near all of his remaining days on Earth in reparative acts of repentance.
There's not an observant Christian in this race.
Indeed, while praying for Trump should be done, and for Kamala Harris as well, the real question in this race, if you are an observant Christian, is not necessarily which of these two candidates should you vote for, but rather should you vote for somebody else.
I'd suggest that at least if you live in a state which is going to go for Trump, or going to go for Harris, you must in fact vote for a third party.
Lets start with the situation I find myself in. What if you are an observant Christian, or more particularly a Catholic, and live in a state Donald Trump is going to win. As an observant Christian, you should not vote for Donald Trump.
First of all, there's no real reason to believe that Trump himself, in spite of some, particularly Evangelicals, claiming him as a Christian, is a Christian. He's a nominal Presbyterian, we know, but if he actually believes any Presbyterian doctrine, he must be an extreme Calvinist that believes in predestination as he apparently feels he can do whatever he wants and it doesn't really matter.
Personally, he's a serious polygamist who has not only repeatedly married, divorced, and remarried, but he's had at least two well known affairs while married.1 His conduct towards women in general is abhorrent.
He's also a constant liar, with serious lies being a grave sin. He tried to steal the 2020 election, which is obviously a grave sin.
Among the horrific lies he's spread are ones about immigrants. And he's threatening to deport millions of people who are, granted, illegal aliens, but who now live in the country, with some having done so for a very long time.
What some will say, is that Christians have to vote for him, as he stands opposed to the moral decay that's brought about such things as transgenderism, and he stands against the sea of blood that the Democrats would unleash in regard to abortion. Both of those are valid point, although on abortion he's modified his position to one that resembles that of a lot of Democrats.
Then there's Kamala Harris.
Harris is a Baptist, but hardly reflects the traditional religious positions of the Anabaptist Protestant faith. She isn't a serial polygamist, to be sure, but her spouse had a prior marriage, which is problematic in Christian theology. Setting that aside, as it's become so common amongst Christians, and as it is ignored by most of Protestantism, its her views on other things that make her a no go for Christians.
She's in favor of the current Democratic platform that fully endorses the horror of Roe v. Wade, which she'd see enshrined as law. The current GOP platform is silent on abortion, as an act of cowardice, but the Democrats are all in on it.
The Democrats are also all in on transgenderism, something for which there's no evidence as being grounded in nature, and may well be grounded in mental illness. And while confusing the boundaries between natural marriage and genders has not been a big issue in this campaign, it's clear where the Democrats are on that as well.
For those reason, an observant Christian cannot vote for her.
But you don't need to.
At least you don't need to, as noted, if you live in a state that's going hard for Trump, or hard for Harris.
The only political party that really squares with Christianity is the American Solidarity Party. If you've heard the Four Things homily I noted the other day, it's the only party you could be a member of and not be squirming in your seats.
It's the only really moral choice in this election, and if you live in a state that's going hard for Harris or Trump, I'd argue its the choice you have to make. In those states you don't have a "lesser of two evils" choice, but rather a protest against evil requirement. Voting for Trump or Harris in a state that's going hard for one or the other endorses their platform, and serves to only do that.
It also serves to reinforce the insane two party system that is not serving the country, at all and needs to end. It's time to end it. Voting for a third party starts that process.
Footnotes:
1. Recently I've seen it noted that Melania Trump is the first "Catholic first lady since Jackie Kennedy".
Yeah, well not a very observant Catholic. In the eyes of the Church she's in an invalid marriage for more than one reason. Barron Trump was, we'd note, baptized in an Episcopal Church, even though Catholics have a duty to raise their children as Catholics.
I don't know her current moral state, of course. She's not seen much with Donald. Given Trump's behavior, they may well be living as "brother and sister". But the point is that she can't exactly be held up as an example of public female Catholicism.
Related threads:
Nijmegen was liberated by 82nd Airborne Division and British Guards Armoured Division.
At Arnhem the British 1st Airborne was pushed back from the bridge by the Germans.
The US 3d Army captured Chatel and Luneville.
The Battle of San Marino ended in a British victory.
The Red Army captured the island of Suur-Tytärsaari in the Gulf of Finland.
Last edition:
Alonzo Stepp born in Kentucky.
His story:
Because I've referenced it more than one time, but apparently never posted it (cowardice at work) I'm going to post here the topic of "the four sins God hates". I'm also doing this as I'm getting to a political thread about this years elections and the candidates, in the context of the argument of "Christians must. . . " or "Christians can. . . "
First I'll note using the word "hate", in the context of the Divine, is a truncation for a much larger concept. "Condemns" might have been a better choice of words, but then making an effective delivery in about ten minutes or less is tough, and truncations probably hit home more than other things.
Additionally, and very importantly, sins and sinners are different. In Christian theology, and certainly in Catholic theology, God loves everyone, including those who have committed any one of these sins, or all of them.
This topic references a remarkably short and effective sermon I heard some time ago. The way my 61 year old brain now works, that probably means it was a few years ago. At any rate, it was a homily based on all three of the day's readings, which is remarkable in and of itself, and probably left every member of the parish squirming a bit. It should have, as people entrenched in their views politically and/or economically would have had to found something to disagree with, or rather be hit by.
The first sin was an easy one that seemingly everyone agrees is horrific, but which in fact people excuse continually, murder.
Murder is of course the unjust taking of a life, and seemingly nobody could disagree with that being a horrific sin. But in fact, we hear people excuse the taking of innocent life all the time. Abortion is the taking of an innocent life. Even "conservatives", however, and liberals as a false flag, will being up "except in the case of rape and incest".
Rape and incest are horrific sins in and of itself, but compounding it with murder doesn't really make things go away, but rather makes one horror into two. Yes, bearing a child in these circumstances would be a horrific burden. Killing the child would be too.
The second sin the Priest noted was sodomy. He noted it in the readings and in spite of what people might like to say, neither the Old or New Testaments excuse unnatural sex. They just don't. St. Paul is particularly open about this, so much so that a local female lesbian minister stated that this was just "St. Paul's opinion", which pretty much undercuts the entire Canon of Scripture.
A person can get into Natural Law from here, which used to be widely accepted, and which has been cited by a United States Supreme Court justice as recently as fifty or so years ago, and the Wyoming Supreme Court more recently than that, and both in this context, but we'll forgo that in depth here. Suffice it to say that people burdened with such desires carry a heavy burden to say the least, but that doesn't make it a natural inclination. In the modern Western World we've come to excuse most such burdens, however, so that where we now draw lines is pretty arbitrary.
Okay, those are two "conservative" items.
The next wasn't.
That was mistreating immigrants.
This sort of speaks for itself, but there it is. Scripture condemns mistreating immigrants. You can't go around, as a Christian, hating immigrants or abusing them because of their plight.
Abusing immigrants, right now, seems to be part of the Conservative "must do" list.
And the final one was failing to pay workmen a just wage. Not exactly taking the natural economy/free market approach in the homily.
Two conservatives, and two liberal.
That's because Christianity is neither liberal or conservative, but Christianity. People claiming it for teir political battles this year might well think out their overall positions.
Fighting was ongoing in Italy.
The Moscow Armistice was signed between Finland and the USSR.
The land ceded by Finland was similar in extent to that which had been ceded to end the Winter War four years earlier.
Will discuss the history of Finnish wars with the USSR in a separate thread, which is much more complicated than generally recalled, but suffice it to say, Karelia had been a major bone of contention between the two countries, and fought over several times in the 20th Century until the Continuation War seemingly ended the dispute.
The Battle of Păuliș ended in Romanian-Soviet victory.
The Soviets took Valga, Estonia. A mass flight from the advancing Soviets by the Estonian population was underway, with a huge percentage of the population on their feet and in boats to attempt to escape.
British 30 Corps reached the US 82nd Airborne at Grave.
The Battle for Brest ended in Allied victory.
The Battle of Hürtgen Forest began between German and U.S. forces in the Hürtgen Forest began. The battle would continue until mid December. The Battle over a 54 square mile of industrial forest on the Belgian German frontier would continue until December 16 and became the longest battle on German ground during World War II and is the second longest single battle the U.S. Army has ever fought after The Battle of Bataan.
US tanker Lafayette G. Pool lost his third Sherman tank in combat in a night engagement when it was ambushed by a German Panther at Münsterbusch, southeast of Aachen, Germany. Pool lost his leg in the engagement, ending a pre war amature boxing career.
In 81 days of combat tanks commanded by Pool had destroyed 12 German tanks, 258 total armored vehicles and self propelled busn and killed German soldiers.
Pool reentered the Army in 1949 and retired in 1960. He thereafter became a Protestant minister. He passed away in 1991.
The SS declared a state of emergency in Denmark over the ongoing strike.
Heavy fighting occurred on Peleliu and Angaur.
The U-407 and U-867 were sunk by the Allies and the U-565 damaged beyond repair.
Last edition:
The 101st Airborne Division liberated Eindoven.
Lieutenant Colonel Robert George Cole, who would receive the Medal of Honor for his actions during Operation Overlord, was killed by a German sniper during Market Garden. He was 29 years old.
Another American combatant would be killed in an action that resulted in his posthumously receiving the Medal of Honor.
The President of the United States of America, in the name of Congress, takes pride in presenting the Medal of Honor (Posthumously) to Private First Class Charles Howard Roan (MCSN: 504236), United States Marine Corps Reserve, for the conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty while serving with the Second Battalion, Seventh Marines, First Marine Division, in action against enemy Japanese forces on Peleliu, Palau Islands, 18 September 1944. Shortly after his leader ordered a withdrawal upon discovering that the squad was partly cut off from their company as a result of the rapid advance along an exposed ridge during an aggressive attack on the strongly entrenched enemy, Private First Class Roan and his companions were suddenly engaged in a furious exchange of hand grenades by Japanese forces emplaced in a cave on higher ground and to the rear of the squad. Seeking protection with four other Marines in a depression in the rocky, broken terrain, Private First Class Roan was wounded by an enemy grenade which fell close to their position and, immediately realizing the eminent peril to his comrades when another grenade landed in the midst of the group, unhesitatingly flung himself upon it, covering it with his body and absorbing the full impact of the explosion. By his prompt action and selfless conduct in the face of almost certain death, he saved the lives of four men. His great personal valor reflects the highest credit upon himself and the U. S. Naval Service. He gallantly gave his life for his comrades.
The Battle of Arracourt commenced in France.
The US dropped supplies from B-17s to resistance fighters in Warsaw, the only such mission permitted by the Soviets. The aircraft flew on to Soviet held territory.
It's often been speculated, not without reason, that Stalin allowed the uprising to bleed itself out as it was resulting in the deaths of a present combatant, the Germans, and a feared future one, the Poles.
The Jun'yō Maru was sunk off Sumatra by the British submarine Tradewind resulting in the deaths of 5,620 people, most of whom were Allied POWs or Japanese slave labor. The event is one of the worst naval disasters of all time, taking into account the lives lost were largely innocent.
Last edition: