How you can tell that being "Gay" is no longer interesting.I suppose it'll be controversial to say it, but everyone is well aware that some of the people who claim to be "gay", or more properly homosexual, only claim that for publicity's sake or because it's supposed to be edgy. Others do, as they have weak personalities and adopt whatever trend is in the news, and its been in the news.
This doesn't mean that there aren't people with same sex attraction. There certainly are. Indeed, the people who claim to be gay as it's trendy are an insult to people who actually have same sex attraction.
This sort of things is common with every sort of attribute. Just a couple of years ago we had people who were claiming to be black, but weren't. Claiming to be a Native American is another one, with at least one U.S. Senator and one college professor down in Colorado claiming that. Claiming to be a veteran suffering from something is another, with all such people claiming that they saw really valiant service, rather than have worked in the mess hall in San Diego.
In the 30s, if you were of a certain type, being a Communist in certain circles was fun, until it suddenly wasn't.
Madonna has come out as gay.
She isn't.
She is, rather, in a stage of her life when she's no longer very interesting as window dressing. So she has to do something, now, doesn't she?
We might note that at this part, for people who have made such an extensive career as being heterosexual libertines, to claim that they're gay, really is a good indicator that its really not very interesting to people anymore. I'm sure she'd claim to be a cocker spaniel if that was trendy, but it isn't. For that matter, being gay isn't either.
If she really wants to be in the news, and she obviously does, she should join the Ukrainian army. But then, that'd take real guts.
Or confronting her superficial past and making amends might, but people rarely do that.
Lying Little Feather
And, speaking of pretend, you have heard of Marie Louise Cruz, but as Sacheen Little Feather. She became famous for appearing at the Academy Awards as the behest of Marlon Brando in order to receive his award for The Godfather. Dressed in buckskins, she represented herself as a Native American and the protest was for Native American justice.
She wasn't a Native American.
Upset by the representation of their late sister regarding their late father, her sisters have come forward and revealed that in fact they're all Mexican American and that their father, whom Cruz portrayed as an abusive alcoholic, in fact didn't drink nor abuse anyone in the family. He was, by their accounts, a hardworking immigrant who himself had had an abusive alcoholic father.
Cruz began portraying herself as a Native American in the very early 1970s, trying to obtain acting roles, which she was somewhat successful at doing, with the "Little Feather" persona. Like Madonna, she stripped herself of her attire to be photographed, prior to becoming well known, appearing in an intended Playboy photo spread that was called "Ten Little Indians", apparently, as it featured ten Native American women.
Or at least ten who were thought to be Native Americans.
There's a quote in a San Francisco area newspaper about this episode.
“Sacheen Littlefeather, the Bay Area Indian Princess, and nine other tribal beauties are sore at Hugh Hefner. Playboy ordered pictures of them, riding horseback nude in Woodside and other beauty spots, and then Hefner rejected the shots (by Mark Fraser and Mike Kornafel) as ‘not erotic enough.’ Why do them in the first place? ‘Well,’ explained Littlefeather ‘everybody says black is beautiful — we wanted to show that red is, too.’ ”
That's obviously out of a different era.
Having said that, the title, and the concept of photographically exploiting Native American women's bodies was really pretty shocking then, even if it is more so now.
Well, the real tragedy, I suppose, was to her family, particularly to her father, who wasn't what he was accused of being.
‘Dilbert’ comic stripped from nearly 80 newspapers
Dilbert is funny.
This isn't something you can say about every cartoon. Family Circle, for example, is not funny. It may have been once, but it isn't anymore.
The same is largely true of Garfield.
It has to do with Lee Enterprises, which owns our local newspaper, as well as the one in Billings, which in fact frequently share news stores.
Lee also includes the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, which in an act of rebellion, and which saw its 34 cartoons go to 10, has been publishing letters of protest from its readership.
All of which goes to attack the frankly, flaming BS claim that modern newspapers tend to make that they're vital to the local reader.
One of the claimed BS benefits to reducing the cartoons is that they were making room for local newstories. This is absurd, quite frankly, as anyone who ever picks up a thick old newspaper would know. Want more coverage, add it. Poof, it's there.
And additionally, often children, whose young interests the papers claim to hold dear, often are first introduced to newspapers through cartoons. Eliminate them, and there goes that readership.
Rotating door
A reporter from the local newspaper noted she's leaving.
No surprise, our local reporter position is a revolving door for cub reporters. It's sad, really. The national paper company brings them in, and as soon as they're trained up, they move on.
Barnard College will offer abortion pills for students
So reads a headline. This text followed.
Barnard applies a reproductive justice and gender-affirming framework to all of its student health and well-being services, and particularly to reproductive healthcare. In the post-Roe context, we are bolstering these services," Catallozzi and Grinage said.
Barnard apparently applies a lot of Orwellian babble as well.
Barnard is a women's college. Whatever else it theoretically does, it's supplied to provide an education to the young women who go there, such that they'll be well-educated members of society who can be later productive in their chose endeavors.
"Reproductive justice" is something that, at least unless you are Chinese in which that would apply to struggles against injustice, doesn't rally mean anything whatsoever. And gender-affirming frameworks have little to do with failing to control your own conduct.
Women's colleges have been in existence since 1836. Weirdly, vast numbers of the students didn't end up pregnant at them in earlier eras, prior to "the pill". It's almost like people were sufficiently educated that they knew what reproduction entailed, and how not to engage in it prematurely.
Weird.
More freedom, less government, and more cash?
The State gave out $6,600,000 in rent relief, funded by the Federal Government, last month.
This is interesting for a state that claims to hate Federal money like a Bar Tender hates the Temperance Union. We hate it just enough to hold our hands out.
I wonder how the "Less government, more freedom" party, at least one of whom new members is a prominent landlord, will react to this.
Will they turn down the Federal money?
Intellectual consistency would demand they would, tenants out on the street or not.
Guns bought through credit cards in the US will now be trackable
This is being treated in certain circles as disastrous, but it's really hard to get too concerned about it. So what?
Speaking of packing heat. . .
Our current Interim Secretary of State has semi famously sported a sidearm all the time, although he's noted that he can't do that as Secretary of State, as the state government doesn't let you walk around inside its buildings armed. UW doesn't let you do that on its grounds, either, but that didn't stop ISoS Allred from open carrying on the campus.
The concept, of course, is that a gun battle could break out at any time, and you'll be armed to address it. If, however, that's what you are really worried about, concealed carry would make more sense, although I'd note that not everyone has the body to carry concealed. Not everyone really has the body to open carry with that goal, either.
Anyhow, as this has now become a big deal in some circles locally, and those same circles make much of "less government, more freedom", and a "right to keep and bear arms" with no restrictions, implies the right to use them, is dueling now allowed? It'd sure cut down on all that pesky civil litigation.
_under_attack_by_dive_bombers_during_the_Battle_of_Santa_Cruz_Islands_on_26_October_1942_(80-G-20989).jpg)
