Saturday, May 23, 2020

Pandemic

Seattle Washington during the 1918/19 Spanish Flu Pandemic.

Well, guess we might as well start a running thread on this.  This now dominates the news, it's a major event in the history of the world, and there's something every day.

Not that we will be reporting on it every day.

At this point, I've had one blood relative and his wife, and his brother and sister in law come down with the disease in my hometown.  So it's hit home.  My daughter, wife and myself have all been sick with something, but we're quite certain its not that.  Still, this is a weird time to get sick with anything.

We'll update as we go along, but we've already reported on this story a lot.  As of this moment, there are twenty seven threads here that mention the pandemic, although not all of them are dedicated threads.   The more ore less dedicated ones are below.

We'll be the first to note, as well we should, that some of our earlier threads were flat out wrong.  Things have gone from scary to bad to worse.  

This week, promises to be the worst in the country so far.  Over the weekend, the Administration braced the public for it to be "the worse", but I doubt it will be. There will be worse weeks yet to come.

So we'll start collecting some threads here in a general running fashion.  We'll otherwise keep running individual entries as we see fit. After all, this isn't a major well read website, so we can do as we please.

But be careful out there.

April 6, 2020

_________________________________________________________________________________

Here's an extremely interesting scientific analysis of peaks and deaths projected for the US, assuming that the current social distancing keeps on keeping:

COVID-19 projections assuming full social distancing through May 2020


A person wouldn't want to run around claiming to be optimistic from this data, but it is more optimistic than other recent projections.  If this is correct, the peak should come on April 15.

That's the peak. That doesn't mean things are over.

It also shows the pandemic basically being over in the United States by some  point in early June.  And it 81,766 deaths through August. That's a large death toll, but it is much less than the 675,000 who died in the 1918 Spanish Flu Epidemic.

That's right, 675,000.

It's more Americans who lost their lives in Vietnam or Korea, but actually not a lot more than died due to the flu last year, which was estimated at 61,000 people.  Last year was a really bad flu year.  The estimates are that this year 34,000 Americans will die from the flu.

These are projections, of course, and they assume the social distancing, etc., keeps on keeping on, which it looks like it will.

April 6, 2020, part two.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Here's a headline that I didn't expect to see:

Fremont County greenhouse, garden experts promote growing world war-era 'victory gardens'


The article goes on to note that Fremont County organizers have started a Victory Garden 2020 campaign and base part of their argument on food security, which the maintain is a demonstrated need due to the Coronavirus Pandemic.

April 7, 2020

________________________________________________________________________________

Legendary singer-songwriter John Prine, who pioneered the 1970s genre of "New Grass" folk music, died of the Coronavirus.  He had recently been reported to be recovering.

Prine was a favorite of mine.  Several people with celebrity status have died to date in the pandemic, but most of them were in the fringe area of fame and I didn't know who they were, which doesn't mean anything one way or another  I did know who Prine was.

Prine was in the category of individuals with imperiled health.  He'd twice battled cancer, the second time lung cancer in 2013.

Amazon announced that it was suspending a delivery service that competed with other carriers, including UPS, FedEx and the United States Post Office, effective in June.  The huge company has been struggling with delivery issues as the nation went into lock down and it will instead be focusing on straightening out its backlog.  The news should help the USPS which is nearly out of money at the present time and which has been struggling with lost revenue due to competition for years.

April 8, 2020

________________________________________________________________________________

Not really meant to be amusing here, one thing that has happened in the past few days is that Wyoming has revived the old rallying cry of "Greenie Go Home", this time due to the pandemic.  Or, more accurately, Greenie Stay Home.

Long residents, and certainly natives, of this state have long had sort of a love hate relationship with Colorado, with us hating more of what is and has become Colorado than loving it, and with Coloradans feeling free to over love and take the best of what is Wyoming.  The exchange is tolerated as we have to, of course, and because of Greenie Bucks.  And the tension has become much reduced over the years.  I no longer see, for example, "Live in Colorado, Fish in Colorado" bumper stickers anymore (I also don't see "Colorado Native" ones anymore either).

The virus, however, has brought back the old tensions, as stressful times will do.  It showed up on Facebook first with those with a presence in Laramie County noting all the road traffic going up into Wyoming.  In fairness, some of that traffic is likely from Wyoming state government employees who are deemed necessary to their jobs who are reporting to work in Wyoming but who live in Colorado. But others are people who figure that if they aren't working, and they need to isolate, why not isolate in Wyoming and go fishing?

Well, because right now we're nervous about having you here is the answer and Governor Gordon reminded such folks that they've been ordered to quarantine for fourteen days upon arrival.  I suspect that isn't a difficult requirement for people who are pulling into fishing spots as they'll regarded themselves as isolated in that fashion.

Wyoming has fully joined the "Howl for . . . " movement, in which at 8 p.m. people go out and howl in celebration, somehow, of health care workers.  Apparently 8:00 marks their shift change.

In the UK people go out and clap, which makes more sense to me.  Of course, it'd be hard to hear in Wyoming given the distance, but the howling is being done in other locations as well, such as Colorado.  It's nice that people are acknowledging health care workers, but the howling motif is a bit confusing in this regard.

In news from other areas, the contra voice heard somewhat here of "get back to normal" is getting a test. . . in Sweden.

There have been some contrary voices here in the U.S.  One, for example, was in an op ed in the New York Times.  But by and large the US, lead by the states, has gone into shelter in place quarantines.  Only nine states, the last time I looked, were outside of them, and at least one of them, Wyoming, had a set or county restrictions and statewide restrictions that meant, in practical terms, it had ordered a shelter in place that was tailored for its locality (although that received some criticism from a former Wyoming Gubernatorial candidate who argued that at least as of the expiration of the current restrictions, things need to ease up.

Danse Macabre, 1493.

Sweden didn't lighten up, at least not much, and hasn't banned gatherings and the like. Apparently, to the extent that people are engaging in "social distancing", they're just doing it on their own.  The government argued that quarantines would prove counter productive, as sooner or later people would ignore them.

Well, that doesn't seem to actually be the case so far.  In the US people are largely observing them even though the US is the last society on earth that I thought would.  And Sweden's death rate due to COVID 19 is, so far, higher than the United States on a per capita basis.

So that experiment appears to be happening.

April 9, 2020
______________________________________________________________________________


Governor Gordon requested a Federal disaster declaration for Wyoming. The Governor’s press release on the request stated.
Gov. Gordon requests federal disaster declaration for Wyoming  

CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Governor Mark Gordon has submitted a request to President Trump asking for a major disaster declaration for Wyoming. The declaration would allow all 23 of Wyoming’s counties and the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes to access funding and services for crucial assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic.  
“Though Wyoming has not reached the dire situations of some states, this declaration will help us to prepare and mobilize resources when we need them,” Governor Gordon said. “I look forward to a swift response to our request from the federal government.” 
The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act allows states to request a Public Assistance and Individual Assistance Disaster Declaration to respond to incidents that exceed capabilities of a state to respond effectively.  
The declaration provides Wyoming the opportunity to access assistance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for construction of temporary medical facilities, if needed. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is reviewing sites in Wyoming to identify extra space for overflow patients and healthcare workers should it be needed.  
“This requested declaration will help ensure Wyoming gains access to critical assistance as we continue our mission to respond to this pandemic,” Wyoming Office of Homeland Security Director Lynn Budd said. “Providing individual assistance programs will be vital to help our residents recover from this crisis.” 
The declaration also allows the state to receive additional federal resources and services for Wyoming residents, including crisis counseling, disaster unemployment assistance, legal services, disaster case management and Small Business Administration disaster assistance.  
As of April 9, Wyoming has 230 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in 18 counties.
On the same day, he proclaimed Good Friday, April 10, a Day of Prayer.

Governor Gordon proclaims April 10 Day of Prayer  
CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Governor Mark Gordon will sign a proclamation tomorrow declaring Friday, April 10, 2020 a Day of Prayer in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. The day of prayer is cross-denominational with the intent to unify people of many faiths during the crisis. 
“Across all faiths and beliefs, we can all come together at this time of year to find a sense of peace and purpose,” Governor Gordon said. “I invite our leaders and citizens to pray that the present pandemic may be controlled, caregivers protected, our soldiers and their families watched over, the economy strengthened and life normalized.” 
April 10 is Good Friday and is observed by many denominations as a day of prayer and fasting. Joining the Governor in this effort is the National Association of Evangelicals and the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. People of all faiths are welcome to participate. 
In Casper, on the same day, a small group of libertarian protesters gathered in Pioneer Park to protest the Governor’s emergency orders and seeking to have them lifted as being harmful to business.  The National Outdoor Leadership School in Lander also announced layoffs given the COVID 19 Pandemic and its impact on their school.

April 10, 2020

________________________________________________________________________________

Meanwhile, in Teton County, 2000 people signed a petition asking Governor Gordon to make the present order regarding activities and the like stricter.

April 10, 2020, part two.
________________________________________________________________________________

The Tribune reports that Wyoming Governor Gordon received a comment of some sort for Rachel Maddow and indeed a comment from Maddow, simply noting that Governor Gordon hasn't ordered a shelter in place in Wyoming, is on her Twitter feed.

Probably hardly worth noting, but we will nonetheless, Governor can't issue any quarantine orders in Wyoming at all.  Under Wyoming's law, the senior health officer for the state, not the Governor, as that sole and exclusive authority.

Be that as it may, and much more worth noting, the Tribune has an article in today featuring a chart in which they look at the restrictions of all the neighboring states.  It's really a revelation.  Wyoming's existing orders are stricter in some instances than those of the neighboring states with "shelter in place" orders.  Indeed, no two states are the same and some of the things allowed in shelter in place states aren't allowed here under the existing order.

Utah apparently has no order at all and everything is open save for things that shut down voluntarily.  That's interesting in that at least the Catholic Diocese of Salt Lake halted Public Mass and Confession prior to Wyoming's Diocese of Cheyenne.  I knew that, but I assumed that was because of a state order.  It wasn't.

Which brings about the point that the Governor has, which is that Wyoming's order may not be a shelter in place order, but it's so extensive that there's really not much else Wyoming could do.  A lot of Wyoming's major industries are in the critical category and those that aren't are already under some sort of order.  An order could go a little further, but how much further we can really go, from now until the end of the month, is pretty debatable.

On other matters, for the first time in U.S. history every state has been declared to be a disaster area.

In Europe, the Netherlands have noticed a spike in reported deaths.

This is interesting for a couple of reasons, one being that it seems to suggest that a lot of cases just aren't being reported  It isn't that they've had a spike in Coronavirus related deaths, just deaths.  As that is odd, the suggestion is that they have a fair number of unreported cases.



Also interesting is that the Netherlands took an approach much like that urged by Dr. Katz in his New York Times op ed.  I.e., protect the vulnerable and go for herd immunity for everyone else.  They had to change their approach due to Dutch civil disobedience as the Dutch listened instead to the recommendations of European doctors and imposed self isolation on themselves, after which the Dutch government followed the views of their citizens.  The spike death level might seem to suggest that the people got it right.

This is of note here as, in spite of what some feel that the Governor should do, Wyomingites basically have followed the national advice to a large degree.  Employers have closed businesses that weren't ordered to be closed.  People are staying home.  While I've heard people say things like "it looks like people are still out", many more are shocked by how few people actually are out and how many things have closed.

April 12, 2020

________________________________________________________________________________

China disclosed 97 new Coronavirus cases on Sunday, over half of which were Chinese nationals who arrived on Russian flight to Shanghai on April 10.

Obviously, there's a host of conclusions that can be drawn from that.

April 13, 2020

________________________________________________________________________________

Wyoming had its first death due to the Coronavirus yesterday.  The victim of the disease is reported as an elderly Johnson County man who had imperilled health.

On the same day the news featured reports of Dr. Fauci praising Governor Gordon's approach to the virus, which has been nearly as strict as the quarantine approach taken by most other states.

President Trump declared yesterday that he has the authority to override those state orders, which he absolutely does not.  Indeed, one thing the COVID 19 pandemic has made clear is the amount of authority individual states retain in the face of a disaster, and it's very large.  Quarantine efforts have been completely lead by the states and imposed by them.  The Oval Office can do nothing about that.

One state that didn't go into quarantine with a stay at home order has been South Dakota which now has a hot spot of the disease in Rapid City.  300 cases are tied to a Smithfield pork processing plant.  This puts a new wrinkle in Wyoming's approach as Rapid City borders Wyoming and we now have two states, Colorado and South Dakota, with large scale outbreaks.

Also yesterday, a sailor from the USS Roosevelt died of the disease. The Roosevelt has been tied up in a drama surrounding its now relieved captain that will be the topic of a thread here, if I get around to it.

Finally, and related to the item immediately above, North Korea fired anti shipping missiles into the sea yesterday.  The entire pandemic has to be aggravating to Kim Jong Un, the Stalinist leader of the country, who is getting very little media attention now days.

April 14, 2020

_______________________________________________________________________________

President Trump indicated that the United States was going to defund the World Health Organization in retaliation for the WHO covering up, in his view, the emerging epidemic, when it was just that, in China.  17% of the organization's budget is provided by the US.


This brought a storm of protests but also some surprisingly sympathetic treatment from commentators on NPR.  The organization, which uses the correct snake on a stick symbol for medicine as opposed to the inaccurate one used in the U.S., is a branch of the United Nations and therefore has always been subject to some dislike in conservative circles in the U.S.  That notwithstanding, the move has been largely condemned and in particular condemned for coming at the time at which it is.

Perhaps ironically, the standard for some medical things is set by the WHO and incorporated by reference by branches of the U.S. government.  That's unrelated to this, of course, but it is a bit ironic.

My suspicion is that this won't actually be carried out.

Closer to home, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department announced it was halting the sale of short term out of state fishing licenses.  It's announcement stated:
CHEYENNE - The Wyoming Game and Fish Department is suspending the sale of nonresident daily and five-day fishing licenses, effective immediately. This suspension is due to the need to ensure individuals coming into Wyoming for a non-work related purpose comply with Governor Gordon’s April 3, 2020 Directive requiring a fourteen day quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Individuals are responsible for complying with all state and local orders.
While Coloradans aren't mentioned by name in the announcement, they've been getting mentioned by name in complaints from Laramie County residents and even the Governor.  Wyoming gets a lot of Colorado fisherman up on weekends and even on weekdays as it is, often filling up the good camping spots at popular trophy fishing locations.  Some seem to have decided to spend their state's "shelter in place" requirements up in Wyoming at those locations, for which they really can't be blamed, but which is impacting Wyoming in regard to the virus.  COVID 19 in Laramie County has been specifically tied to Coloradans.

April 16, 2020
________________________________________________________________________________

The President announced his three part program for opening up the economy again.  The entire plan may be read here:

Opening Up America Again

Based upon what's being heard in the news, while President Trump conceded that its really state governors that call the shots on reopening, it is going to start around May 1 for much of the country.

It has started in Europe.  Spain, which was hard hit, has begun to ease back on its restrictions.  France, however, has taken the opposite approach and just extended the length of theirs.

Wyoming is working on a plan for its transition back to open, but the Governor's office isn't indicating when that plan will go into effect, and instead is emphasizing that it will be data driven.

In signs that the public may be doing what we wondered if it might, beginning to take science seriously again, people are going after Oprah Winfrey for comments made by "Dr. Phil" and "Dr. Oz".

I know very little about Dr. Phil and I don't care to know much.  I personally can't stand Dr. Oz and can't grasp why people listen to him other than that they also listen to Oprah Winfrey, who kept promising to retire and never did.

Winfrey is the very emblem of the American secular religion of all values are equal and all nice information that you want to believe is good for you.  She's one of the things that's wrong with American society today and if she's getting heat for boosting bull crap that's circulating in the media, well good.  It's very long overdue.

Anyhow, I don't actually know what either figure stated, but whatever it was, and it may not have been on her show (which weirdly never went away), but some have really come after her.  Jonah Goldberg, a Conservative columnist, wrote regarding her on Twitter:
It's almost like Oprah's major contributions to medical discourse are a total disaster.
Much of the commentary is in the nature of a Twitter storm, which therefore means that it doesn't mean much.  But this is an interesting development.

April 18, 2020

________________________________________________________________________________

April 24, 2020

Yesterday, Wyoming's Governor Gordon announced that next week the state was going to modify its current restrictions on businesses operating as part of the stepped process to reopen the economy.  What these steps will be is not entirely clear, but it appears that gyms, barber shops and beauty salons will be allowed to reopen, but no doubt with certain restrictions.  The modified orders will be issued next week.

As Wyoming is stepping towards reopening some other states are as well, with some taking much larger steps.  Georgia in particular seems to be, which is meeting with a lot of protests one way or another.  In contrast, Illinois has extended its shelter in place order to May 30.

The progress of the disease continues to vary in different localities.  California sustained its largest death toll yesterday.  Other states seem to have plateaued.

Regarding California, one of the states to be impacted very early on, it's now known that it had deaths in early February.  Because of the newness of the disease at the time, it wasn't then detected but subsequent autopsies have shown Coronavirus to be the cause.  That suggests that the virus was in the US earlier than previously supposed.

For that matter, the Chinese are now reporting that they can track SARS-CoV-2, the actual name of the disease back now to a November 17, 2019 infection of a 55 year old resident of Hubei province, the same province that Wuhan is located in. The man was not, however, a resident of Wuhan although it appears that he may have traveled there.

The Chinese haven't confirmed this and right now they aren't claiming that he's "patient zero". Earlier an elderly man from Wuhan was so identified but this news pushes the date back by two weeks and causes real uncertainty in the story of when the virus first showed up.

A person could reasonably state, "so what", but it does actually make a difference in what the world is now experiencing. There's a vast amount that we don't know about the virus and one of those uncertainties is the overall infection rate combined with the asymptomatic infection rate.  Testing in New York, which may or may not be accurate, has suggested that about 14% of New Yorkers have had the virus, many of whom have shown no symptoms.  Some seemed to think that infection rate surprisingly low but it strikes me as the opposite.

One of the reasons that matters is that at some point humans will reach the herd immunity rate with the disease, but we don't know when that is.  For some diseases that rate is as low as 40%, but for most its 80% or more.  We're nowhere near either of those rates, but if it's 80% we're not only a long ways away, but we're going to have to hope for a successful vaccine to be developed in order to achieve it, as the only other way we'll achieve it, and we will, will be after that number of people have had the disease.

Anyhow, the fact that it now appears that the disease appeared weeks earlier than we thought cast a lot of doubt on when the infection first showed up in other places and how long it operated in the population before people were aware of what it was.  It's almost certain that in some places people simply thought they had the flu or a severe cold and had SARS-CoV-2. But if that's the case, then then question is why it didn't result in an outbreak of sudden severity as it did in Wuhan, and for that matter, how was it that there was at a least a lingering bit of time in China before that occured?

On herd immunity and the progress of the disease, one of the things we're now seeing is the sort of odd reveling in grim predictions, which is sort of a counter reaction to the "it's all a fake" sort of reaction that some people had earlier.

One of the positives, if you can call it that, of the pandemic is that suddenly, as earlier noted, science is really back in.  Lots of early claims that the disease wasn't real have evaporated but we now see some who are taking unscientific positions in the name of science.

Once claim is that the virus "reappears".  There's no evidence for that whatsoever.  To the extent that tests might support that suggestion, what that means is that the infection lingers longer than the symptoms do.  That's hardly novel.

Another big one we're seeing a lot of now is that "it'll be back in the Fall".  It might, but that has to do with herd immunity again. The dire suggestions that it'll return year after year as a massive killer are just wrong.

That doesn't mean it won't return in the Fall.  It very well might and, ironically, because of the "flattening the curve" approach that's been adopted.  Proponents of doing little noted that right from the onset and took the position that there was no point in flattening the curve and we'd be better off just rocketing towards herd immunity.  Critics of that approach justifiably noted that this threatened to overwhelm the medical infrastructure but the truth is that we have not come so far to that occurring.  Now at least part of the reason that we haven't had that occur is because we flattened the curve.  And that may indeed have been the absolutely correct thing to do.  Irrespective of that, the return of SARS-CoV-2, if it occurs, will be because of that, we knew that all along, and it won't happen year after year.  We have every reason to believe that by 2021 we'll have a vaccine.

Truth be known, we'll know a lot more about vaccines, and we already know a lot, by that time.  There's already been some curious lines drawn between old vaccines and the current disease which may be real dead ends.  Note that these are vaccines, not treatment for vaccines.  One old TB vaccine, for example, was being looked at as it was thought that it might offer come assistance with this disease.

While I've noted it before, on vaccines, one of the other real positives of the pandemic, if it can be called that, is that its shut up the entire anti vaxer movement, hopefully forever.  Hopefully this will spread to the other baloney anti scientific stuff that Americans have been buying up from purveyors of bogosity in increasing amounts in recent years.  Americans have always been prey to the purchase of snake oil, but in recent years it's become really over the top. The pandemic seems to have brought a screeching halt to that.

Indeed, at least in my case, it's brought an end to the spam emails of that type.  For a long time a business email of my mine has been constantly hit with the most absurd emails purveying all sorts of snake oil bogosity.  It's not just me a sit seems that everyone where I work gets the same set of bogus emails every day.  We've noted it from time to time and compared notes, and they're uniform.  One set of them is a collection that promises you can eat this and that and grow thin.  One in particular is some sort of ice cream you can buy from the hawker and you'll grown thin, it claims.

Bulls***

Anyhow, there's that set, and one set that claims ancient secret lost remedies, one set that claims shocking prophecies always involving Donald Trump and the Pope, and another that offers mail order brides from Russia or Asia.  Now all of those are gone, and I'm glad to see them gone.  I hope they never return.

In their place are constant ones for thermometers.

________________________________________________________________________________

April 27, 2020

Meet the Press had a genuinely scary interview with a Dr. Michael Osterholm over the weekend.

Some places in the U.S. are in the process of opening back up and there's sort of a sense of "we're through the worst of this", which most of us hope and pray is true.  Dr. Osterholm's views, however, weren't at all comforting.  In his interview, he states:

Well, first of all, let's just take the numbers. At most, 5-15% of the United States has been infected to date. With all the experience we have had so far, this virus is going to keep transmitting. It's going to keep trying to find humans to do what it does until we get at least 60% or 70% of the people infected. That is what it will take to get herd immunity. You know, Chuck, we are in the very earliest days of this situation right now. You know, if I could just briefly say one story here. Right after 9/11, I spent a number of days up at your studios doing filing around the issue of what was happening. The predecessor here, the late Tim Russert, used to say to me all the time, "Hi, Doc. How're you doing? Is the big one here yet?" And I would always say, "No, Tim, it is not." If he asked me today, "Is the big one here? Is it coming?" I would say, "Tim, this is the big one." And it is going to be here for the next 16 to 18 months. And people do not get that yet. We are just on the very first stages. When I hear New York talking about the fact they are down the backside of the mountain, I know they have been through hell. And that is an important statement. But they have to understand that’s not the mountain. That is the foothills. They have mountains to go yet. We have a lot of people to get infected before this is over.
In other words, Dr. Osterholm's view is that this is going to be with us until we get herd immunity, one way or another.  Elaborating on how that will occur, he stated:
Well, herd immunity is clearly going to happen if we do not have a vaccine. I do think that we have a better chance of a vaccine than some. The statement that came out yesterday from the World Health Organization suggesting there may not be immunity was misinterpreted to mean that we do not have evidence today that you are protected from humans. But we have actually animal model data, monkeys that have been infected intentionally and then rechallenged, that were protected. We have a new study on Friday that said vaccine protected them. So I think we are going to have it. I just do not think it is going to be soon. And we are on virus time right now, not human time. And so what we can get done in the next 16 to 18 months, that is great. But if we do not, we will not have a vaccine in time to protect most of the people in the world.
Herd immunity sans vaccine took a long time with the 18/19 flu, as a recent item posted here provided evidence of.  That pandemic had two waves, something that's being noted a lot now days, and for the most part it ended in 1919 for reasons still not completely understood  Maybe we had achieved herd immunity, or maybe it had evolved into a less lethal strain, something common with flu strains.  Indeed, it's already been noted that SARS-CoV-2 had thirty strains and some of them are less severe than others, so perhaps it works the same way.  Let's hope so.  In terms of evolutionary biology, that actually is the best genetic strategy for it.

Anyhow, this seems to run counter to what various governmental bodies are expecting, so we'll see how that works.  New Zealand had declared that it's completely contained the disease and basically eliminated it Sweden, whose approach was much less restrictive than other countries, has been taking a lot of heat but now claims it was right in its approach.  We aren't hearing much from China, the point of origin, right now, so perhaps its severely restrictive approach worked.  Spain is opening back up.

Or, perhaps in a heavily globalized economy, it'll all get rolling again. The 1918/19 flu did in a much less globalized era.

Also on Meet The Press the viewers were presented with another of a cumulative set of increasing reasons why Chuck Todd ought to be sent back down to the minors, this time in regard to an interview of Dr. Deborah Birx.  Birx is the coordinator of the White House Coronavirus Task Force and in that role she found herself in the uncomfortable role of having to address comments recently made by President Trump which have been baffling to say the least and which are noted below.  One of the things that she did, however, was to give a pretty good scientific explanation on the nature of testing for the virus, stating that mass testing would require a breakthrough in RNA type testing.  This is simply a scientific fact but it gave Todd what he thought was ammo of some sort leading a listener to the conclusion that Todd probably didn't really grasp what he was saying.  Birx's comment wasn't political in any fashion and it frankly runs counter to what the White House has been saying on testing, which may be why Todd tried to run with it a little later in the show.

That came up when he was discussing the situation with invited panelist Dr. Vin Gupta, who was very critical up to that point of the Trump Administration's medical approach.  Todd was questioning Dr. Gupta on whether, essentially, Dr. Birx was having to compromise herself in order to take the company line, more or less, in the Administration, and Dr. Gupta was critical of her more or less giving favorable treatment to a single study that suggested that sunlight may play a role in curing the disease.  Sensing his moment Todd then went on:
I want to stay with you here a second, Dr. Gupta, and ask you about the testing comments that she made. That really struck me as one of the headlines out of the interview, when she basically acknowledged-- "acknowledge" may be the wrong word because there may be disputes about this. But essentially saying, "We're not going to be able to ramp up testing under the current situation." Do you concur with her on that? Or do you think they're just trying to come up with an explanation to follow the policy the president wants?
Not too surprisingly, as he is a physician, Gupta went on to indicate his agreement with Birx on the testing:
I think she's right actually. We need outside-the-box thinking. And so she's spot on. Under the current situation, Dr. Osterholm beautifully laid it out. That right now, every new technology that the FDA's putting out there largely is constrained by the same supply chain bottleneck that, Chuck, you and I have talked endlessly about: swabs, reagents. He just said it. He just laid it out. That's why we need more of a focus on interesting, new, creative, outside-the-box thinking, innovations like the Rutgers scientists on saliva. By definition, circumnavigating these supply chain bottlenecks. You spit in a tube. Potentially you can mail it to a lab if you do it at home. That's not that far off. So right now under the way we're thinking about it, the inside-the-box, constrained thinking, yes, I think she's correct.
I didn't see the show, but listened to it, as always, but on audio at least there was a noticeable pause following Todd's statement, followed by Todd changing topics and panelist and moving on to the economy.

This past week Trump certainly left himself open to criticism with his off the cuff comments on the disease, and its not surprising at all that the news shows (and I haven't gotten to This Week yet) would have a lot to discuss and criticize in this area.  But Todd has really gone off the rails and isn't even ballpark close to objective anymore.  It's really time for him to go.

In other news, President Trump has reportedly cancelled his daily briefings on the disease.

The briefings were becoming fodder for criticism as he sometimes countered his own medical experts and then offered off the cuff comments on medical matters that were often extremely ill informed. This capped off with a comment that seems to have tried to hope for a "miracle cure" type solution but which made a terribly poor analogy to cleaners which, if taken literally, would have been lethal  I haven't listened to the transcript of those comments as I generally don't listen to day by day press briefings, so I only know a snippet of what was said, but it is this sort of thing which has lead Trump's advisor to try to reign him in forever, and given that there has been a recent death that seems to have been attributable to such an off the cuff remark his handlers apparently felt that enough was enough and have gotten through to him.  After that, his advisors seemed to have gotten his attention and he's reportedly decided to focus on the economy on his upcoming statements.
________________________________________________________________________________

April 28, 2020

A few states are now beginning to partially reopen, although a person needs to be careful about what assuming that means.  Indeed, it's interesting that Wyoming, which people have been criticized for being not closed, is listed as fully having restrictions in place by the New York Times.

States that are easing up on some restrictions, which actually doesn't mean lifting all restrictions, are, as of right now:

Alaska, which has had a shelter in place order since March 28.  It's partial reopening is subject to strict limitations.

Colorado, which had a stay at home order in place allowed it to expire of April 26 and has a lesser set of restrictions now in place.

Georgia, which will have its shelter in place order expire on April 30.  It's reopening has been controversial but is subject to restrictions.

Minnesota, which will have its shelter in place order expire on May 3 is allowing for a partial reopening of the economy.

Mississippi, which had its shelter in place order expire yesterday, will allow some businesses to reopen.

Montana, which had its shelter in place order expire on the 26th, allowed some businesses to reopen and allowed churches to reopen.  Bars and restaurants will reopen on May 4.

Oklahoma, which never had shelter in place but restrictions, lifted restrictions on some businesses on April 24 and about everything else appears to be reset to open, with restrictions, on May 1.


South Carolina, which had a shelter in place order in effect since April 7, reopened part of its economy with restrictions on April 20.

Tennessee, which has a shelter in place order expiring on April 30, allowed restaurants to reopen on April 27 and businesses with restrictions are to follow.

Texas, which has had a shelter in place order in effect is allowing for a partial reopening of its economy later this week.

Wyoming, which never had a shelter in place order in effect but a stout set of restrictions, is allowing some businesses that were closed to reopen with restrictions.

There's an element of controversy everywhere things are opening back up, but there's also been controversy in keeping things locked down.  It's widely acknowledged that the economy can't be closed forever and while those urging it closed for longer periods of time, where they are, definitely have a humanitarian concern, there's been no real answer on how long the economy can really be suspended.

On that, on Meet the Press, panelist openly debated putting the entire American working population on the government payroll temporarily, a truly stunning proposition that never would have been considered prior to this event.
_________________________________________________________________________________

April 28, part two.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEApril 28, 2020CONTACT: Michael Pearlman, Communications Director Michael.Pearlman@wyo.gov

Governor Gordon authorizes re-opening of gyms, personal care servicesunder new public health orders
Child care providers may also re-open to children of non-essential personnel
CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Governor Mark Gordon has announced that new public health orders effective May 1 will allow gyms, barber shops, hair salons and other personal care services to reopen under specific operating conditions designed to minimize public health risk from COVID-19. Other parts of the phased approach involve easing restrictions on day cares and issuing guidance to hospitals allowing them to resume elective surgeries.

“These new orders start our process of getting this part of Wyoming’s economy up and running again,” Governor Gordon said. “We have asked Wyoming citizens to make sacrifices over the past five weeks and they have responded. I want to thank these businesses for playing such an important role in our initial battle with COVID-19. Easing the restrictions on these businesses at this time is prudent and gets us one step closer to a return to normal.”

Another part of this phase allows some additional localized approaches to further easing restrictions based on local expertise and health data.

“We all recognize that the virus has had severe impacts in some Wyoming communities, while other towns and counties have been spared,” Governor Gordon said. “This plan takes into account the continued safety of our citizens and establishes a process to consider some case-by-case exceptions to state health orders when appropriate. It is important that we do not surrender the ground we have taken and that we extend our gains against this virus.”

Under modified order Number 1, gyms will be permitted to open on May 1 by adhering to public health guidelines outlined in the new order. These include limits on the number of patrons in the facility, a requirement that staff wear face coverings, and the closure of locker rooms. Gyms are also prohibited from offering one-on-one personal training and group classes. This order is also modified to allow child care centers and home day cares to reopen or continue to operate under specific conditions and precautions. These include limiting groups of people to fewer than 10 per room and implementing screening and cleaning protocols.

Under modified order Number 3, nail and hair salons, barber shops; cosmetology, electrology, and esthetic services; massage therapy services; and tattoo, body art and piercing shops may also open in a limited capacity on May 1 under certain conditions. These include operational requirements limiting the number of patrons, screening of patrons and staff for symptoms of illness or exposure to a person with COVID-19, requiring patrons and staff to wear face coverings and eliminating waiting areas.

No business closed through the public health orders is required to open on May 1. Businesses that choose to stay closed are still eligible for assistance from Small Business Administration (SBA) programs.The Department of Health has also issued updated guidance to hospitals and health care providers outlining how they can resume elective surgeries. That is effective immediately. Public health order Number 2 limiting public gatherings to 10 persons or fewer has been extended through May 15. The Governor’s directive requiring any individual coming to Wyoming to self-quarantine for 14 days remains in place through April 30. An extension to the directive is currently under review, with a decision expected tomorrow.
All three statewide orders have a provision allowing county health officers to submit requests for countywide variances from those orders if the public health conditions in the county warrant the change. The goal is to provide a measure of flexibility in recognition of the fact that public health conditions can vary greatly from county to county in Wyoming.

The Wyoming Business Council will host a series of webinars beginning tomorrow, April 29, to provide information and guidance for businesses eligible for reopening under the new orders. To register, visit https://wyomingbusiness.org/transition.

Copies of all three orders are attached to this release and are linked above.

--END--· ThirdContinuation_Order3.pdf· Dashboard_04282020 (1).pdf· Third Continuation_Order1.pdf· Third Continuation_Order2.pdf









_________________________________________________________________________________

April 30, 2020

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEApril 29, 2020CONTACT: Michael Pearlman, Communications Director Michael.Pearlman@wyo.gov 
Governor Gordon extends 14-day quarantine directive until May 8, announces campground openings 
CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Governor Mark Gordon has extended through May 8 his directive requiring any individual coming to Wyoming from another state or country for a non-work-related purpose to immediately self-quarantine for 14 days. The Governor anticipates allowing the directive to expire at that time, public health conditions permitting. 
Governor Gordon’s decision to let the directive expire May 8 was done after speaking with county commissioners throughout the state and in recognition of existing guidance in place in neighboring states. He noted that Colorado continues to discourage non-essential travel and Montana’s 14-day self-quarantine directive remains in place. 
Governor Gordon has also announced that camping at Wyoming State Parks will begin to open on May 15 for Wyoming residents. Camping will be by reservation only. Additional details on modified operations at Wyoming State Parks will be announced tomorrow.The new directive is attached and can be found here.Continuation of Self-Quarantine Directive.pdf
In other news, California closed its beaches.
_________________________________________________________________________________

May 2, 2020

Movie art director Matteo De Cosmo died at age 52 of the virus.

Celebrity celebrity, Madonna reported that she had tested positive for having had, and then recovered from, the virus.

California's Madoc County defied the orders of the State of California and ceased enforcing the State's quarantine orders and "reopened" on May 1. The county of 5,000 residents has had no reported Coronavirus incidents.

New Mexico extended its stay at home order and ordered roads into hard hit Gallup closed.

The White House prohibited Dr. Fauci from testifying in front of the House of Representatives on May 6 but announced it was allowing him to testify in front of the Senate on May 12.

The Catholic Diocese of Cheyenne announced its closure of Public Masses would continue through May 15 after which the churches would start to reopen for Mass on a modified basis.

________________________________________________________________________________

May 5, 2020

Lots of states are beginning to "open up" with a lot of that opening up being fairly controversial as well.  Locally, the state had eased up on some restrictions starting this week.

I noted the item from the Catholic Diocese of Cheyenne above, here's its actual letter:
Statement from Bishop Steven Biegler, Roman Catholic Diocese of Cheyenne 
These past weeks since COVID-19 descended upon us have been difficult, and the suspension of public Masses has been deeply painful. As Governor Gordon lifts restrictions on some businesses, it is natural for Catholics to have a sense of hope that we can return to a somewhat normal parish life. Nonetheless, the need to protect the elderly and those with underlying conditions continues to be a high priority. Keeping in mind that numerous parishioners, as well as many priests, are at-risk for serious health complications if they contracted COVID-19, the Diocese of Cheyenne will continue to suspend public Masses.  
Beginning May 1, the Sacrament of Reconciliation will be celebrated by appointment using six feet of distance and masks, and the Anointing of the Sick will be celebrated for serious illness or pending surgery.  
The Diocese of Cheyenne is making tentative plans to resume public Masses, Baptisms, Matrimony and funerals for a maximum of ten (10) people on May 15, then on June 1 to expand participation based on the size of the church, while observing six feet of distance between individuals or households. These plans are subject to change.  
Re-opening the churches for public Masses will happen in phases, with health guidelines to follow for the protection of the common good and to minimize the continued spread of COVID-19. The obligatory guidelines include limited attendance, physical distancing and wearing masks. Because there still is a health risk for those who attend any public gathering, the general dispensation from the Sunday obligation will remain in effect.  
As we move forward, we will continue to follow state guidelines and adjust as needed. While we move through incremental steps through the three phases of reopening, I ask for your patience and prayers. Peace in Christ,
On other topics, quite a few counties in Wyoming have sought exemptions from some restrictions and are receiving them.  Teton County imposed tighter restrictions than the state had imposed and the state approved that.

Nationally, the Administration is asserting that the Chinese bear fault for the Pandemic.  Secretary Pompeo stated on This Week that the virus is natural, i.e., not man made, which reflects the scientific consensus but he also claimed that it had escaped a Chinese lab.  The Administration is also asserting that the Chinese acted to cover up the developing epidemic in their country so that they could hoard supplies for their own people.

I'm skeptical of the Chinese lab escape thesis, which seems unlikely to me.  I don't doubt that the Chinese government kept the outbreak secret, however, as that's what governments like that do about everything.

Meanwhile there's been some progress on anti virals to address SARS-CoV-2 as well as some progress towards a vaccine.  My suspicion is that this will develop much more quickly than we suppose.  Likewise, the claims of massive deaths breaking out in June due to reopenings strike me as likely overblown.

On COVID related economic news, Forbes is reporting that we're now at the point where some workers who are on the lower end of the economic scale, depending upon where they live, are making more money not working than they did working.  Nobody is to blame for this but this was nearly inevitable and with the country stretching into the third month of closures of various types, the next inevitable is happening.  Some of those workers are making the logical economic decision of choosing to stay home.

Indeed, why wouldn't you?  It's clearly lower risk and, for them, more financially prudent.

This creates an odd economic effect, however, in that if those workers choose not to come back to work, their employers stand a good chance of failing.  A lot of employees in that category have low employer loyalty for obvious reasons and will soon choose simply to never come back to their former employer, but many of those employers may soon be gone.

________________________________________________________________________________

May 8, 2020

The Army had announced that having had SARS-CoV-2, i.e., COVID-19, bars enlistment into the U.S. Army.

This is unlikely to be a long term thing, but is based on the lasting effect of the disease being presently unknown. Once they are, the Army will reassess.

Locally, so many things are now opening back up its impossible to keep track of it. A series of evolving orders is bringing closures of various types to an end, but with restrictions.  Restaurants in Natrona County may now reopen indoors, but churches interestingly remain subject to the public gathering limit, the state being unwilling to reconsider that for the county.

Statewide, a group of legislators have sent the Governor a letter complaining about his closure orders, even though the state never shut down completely and many of the closures were voluntary.

Those legislators will be back in session in Cheyenne on May 15 for a two day special legislative session concerning spending the money sent to Wyoming by the Federal government.
________________________________________________________________________________

May 9, 2020

Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris, former Democratic candidates and sitting U.S. Senators, have proposed a bill to pay Americans $2,000/month until the current crisis ends.  Such a move would really be a leap into uncharted waters and very well could have the practical impact of destroying the economy with some permanence.  The move pushes the credibility gap on the American monetary system dangerously close the monopoly money level, something that at least Sanders, who never had a firm grasp of where money comes from, has always been comfortable with.

The bill is unlikely to pass but it does serve to illustrate something that's already been noted in the economic press.  Some lower wage earners are actually better off not returning to work as long as crisis related assistance continues to pay off. For those individuals, a certain percentage of them are making rational choices in electing not to return to work. At the $2,000/month level many more would, making the failure of small businesses that depend on the same workers all the more problematic.

This is occurring just as a lot of the states are starting to open back up, including Wyoming which is undergoing a dual economic crisis, only one of which is COVID 19 related.  Restaurants opened in Natrona County yesterday.  The question is if Americans will fully return to their prior dining out customs at the same level they formerly had, something we explored in an entry from yesterday that became one of the most popular threads of this past week in a single day.  It appears likely that churches may open state wide next week.  It'll be interesting to see how churches respond to that when it occurs. Some, maybe most, will no doubt fully reopen and charge ahead.  Others, with large statewide structures and large congregations may react more slowly and keep some restrictions and existing closures in place.

Setting up a contest between sovereigns, South Dakota has ordered Sioux tribes to take down checkpoints in South Dakota within 48 hours.

This is a legally questionable move.  Indian Tribes are sovereigns within their territory and two of the Sioux tribes with lands in South Dakota have issued shelter in place orders, just as the tribes have on Wyoming's Wind River Reservation.  South Dakota never issued such an order and was among the states with the least restrictive provisions.

Wyoming has not interfered with the Wind River Reservation's provisions in any fashion, although Wind River hasn't gone as far as the Sioux in South Dakota apparently have.  At any rate, the legal ability of the state to order the tribe to do something of this type is really questionable and ill advised.

________________________________________________________________________________

May 10, 2020

South Korea is has closed bars and clubs in Seoul after infections of the virus rose.

South Korea's actions in containing the virus have been largely successful, but 50 new infections spiked after a 29 year old man infected with the virus went clubbing.

China is experiencing a spike in Shulan City in north eastern China. the city, located directly north of North Korea, has been closed by the Chinese.  The Chinese have also offered to help fight the infection in North Korea, about which the rest of the world doesn't know much.

None of this, of course, is really good news.

________________________________________________________________________________

May 13, 2020

In the category of not really good news, Meet The Press had its expert physician, Dr. Michael Osterholm, back on last Sunday who once again declared that it was inevitable that the Coronavirus would infect 70% of the human population, a grim assessment.  He basically holds out no hope for a vaccine being developed in sufficient time to prevent that from occurring.

The other guests, including one working on a vaccine and one working on a medication that has, in part, the effect of a vaccine on a temporary basis where more optimistic.  The latter hoped to have the medication fielded by next Fall. The doctor who was working on a vaccine suggested that next Fall might be possible but reserved declaring that, if all goes well, it would be widely available by that time.

Everyone seemed to think a resurgence of the disease, such as was the case with the 1918 Influenza pandemic, is inevitable.  Those working on medications and vaccines hope to have that ready in sufficient time so as to be able to prevent that from occurring.

In Fremont County the County Attorney has declared in a statement that his office will not enforce parts of the state's orders regarding the virus citing the Constitution as the basis for his actions.

Fremont County is one of the hardest hit counties in Wyoming by appearances, but a local official there has declared that this is a statistical appearance as the county has been tested more than others. That claim aside, the county clearly had some notable early fatalities.  Given that, the two statements are interesting as it appears that Fremont County is set to open matters up one way or another, the status of the state orders notwithstanding.

The County, of course, shares a large portion of its territory with the Wind River Indian Reservation, which is a separate sovereign that has its own more restrictive provisions.  The County cannot impact decisions made by the reservation.

All of this does point out a weakness in the state's system.  The state itself has very little in the way of authority to actually easily enforce its orders.  Wyoming lacks a statewide police force outside of the Highway Patrol, which itself is not suitable for any sort of statewide policing.  Really enforcing the state's orders, by the state, would require the state to divert the HP and might require some mobilizatin of the National Guard, neither of which is going to occur in this context.  If the county refuses to act the state's only recourse would be to the courts in an action directed at the county health officer, which is unlikely unless a things start going really badly in the county.

In other news, Dr. Fauci declared that the NFL playing its season in the fall was ill advised, but the NFL indicated it was going forward with plans anyhow.  This came at a time in which some individuals employed in roles close to the White House have come down with the disease.

________________________________________________________________________________

May 14, 2020

Wyoming is rapidly reopening.  Yesterday the Governor issued a new set of orders.  The announcement for them stated:
Restrictions ease under new orders, Governor allocates $17 million in CARES Act funding to expand COVID-19 testing and health response

CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Governor Mark Gordon has announced that updated public health orders effective May 15 will ease restrictions on several business categories and permit restaurants to resume indoor table service statewide. The Governor has also allocated $17 million in federal funding to expand COVID-19 testing, improve contact tracing and add to the state’s supply of personal protective equipment (PPE). 

“We have been working diligently to modify our public health orders to continue a safe and sensible reawakening of Wyoming’s economy,” Governor Gordon said. “I am also pleased to be directing funds available through the CARES Act to improve our ability to identify cases of COVID-19 and limit public exposure to the virus.” 

The modified orders allow restaurants to offer indoor and outdoor dining service under specific conditions intended to limit the potential spread of COVID-19. These include adequate spacing of tables, a requirement that staff wear face coverings and be screened for symptoms of COVID-19, as well as the implementation of increased sanitation measures. The Wyoming Business Council will host a webinar on Thursday, May 14, to provide information and guidance for restaurant industry businesses eligible for expanding operations under the new orders. 

The further easing of orders expands the public gathering limit and permits larger gatherings for churches, religious organizations and funeral homes as long as they implement social distancing measures and specific sanitization procedures. 

Movie theaters and performance venues will also be allowed to reopen in a limited capacity and permit public gatherings of up to 25 persons. Gyms may now open locker rooms, offer personal training and provide group classes for up to 20 participants. Childcare centers will be permitted to have up to 25 persons total in a classroom.



“We must continue to be vigilant about social distancing,” Governor Gordon said. “I am confident that the public and business community will continue to recognize that their actions will allow us to continue a safe, steady path forward. It is important to remember that even as we ease restrictions, COVID-19 is still with us and will continue to be present in Wyoming for some time.” 

The $15 million Governor Gordon has allocated to the Wyoming Department of Health will help the agency increase its diagnostic testing and contact tracing capabilities. Funds will be used to bolster testing capacity at the Public Health Laboratory, obtain additional testing supplies and provide additional support to the team that does contact tracing, that includes people in communities across the state.



The Governor has also allocated $2 million to the Wyoming Office of Homeland Security, who will be working with the Wyoming Business Council to purchase Personal Protective Equipment and distribute it to non-health care related entities to support public safety for businesses and other entities across the state under the new health orders. 


The orders can be found here:

The Wyoming Air National Guard will be doing a fly over of regional hospitals throughout the state on Friday to honor health care workers.  At the same time, some of the emergency centers set up for the Pandemic are standing down. They'll remain ready as a reserve, should the virus revive, but they are not going to be maintained on a standing basis.

France ended its lockdown on May 11.

________________________________________________________________________________

May 21, 2020

Governor Gordon signed three bills that came out of the recent special session, but used his line item veto as well.  His press announcement stated:

Governor Gordon signs 3 bills from Special Session
CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Governor Mark Gordon has signed three pieces of legislation passed by the Wyoming Legislature that provide a framework for spending $1.25 billion in federal funding awarded to the State through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

The bills were developed and passed during the Legislature’s special session held electronically on May 15-16.

Senate File 1001 gives the Governor further flexibility to spend the $1.25 billion in CARES Act funding through three allotments. It sets out $450 million immediately, an additional $400 million starting on July 15 and the remaining balance of $400 million beginning Sept. 15.

Senate File 1002 makes changes to the State’s unemployment insurance program and workers compensation program. It also creates an eviction prevention program that will be administered by the Wyoming Community Development Authority.
House Bill 1004 provides funding to establish three business-relief programs that will provide assistance to Wyoming companies impacted by COVID-19 and health orders. It allocates $50 million for the “Wyoming Business Interruption Stipend Program" to help businesses with 50 or fewer employees with grants of up to $50,000 dollars; $225 million for the “Coronavirus Business Relief Stipend Program” to assist businesses with up to 100 employees with stipends of up to $300,000; and $50 million for the “Coronavirus Mitigation Stipend Program” that will help Wyoming businesses of any size pay for COVID-19 related expenses up to $500,000.
The Governor exercised his line-item veto authority to address two elements of House Bill 1004. The first addresses the timing of the allocation of funds. Under the bill as written, the Legislature appropriated $325 million for these business relief programs, but required the entire appropriation be applied to the initial $450 million. This would limit the Governor’s flexibility to address other urgent needs prior to July 15.
The second line-item veto removes the $20,000 minimum amount that businesses would be eligible for under the Business Interruption Stipend Program. This better aligns the grant to the true need of the smallest businesses with minor losses.

The Governor’s veto letter and an additional letter addressing Senate Files 1001 and 1002 are attached. 
In other news, after having seemingly reached a plateau, Wyoming is now experiencing an increase in reported cases.  One in Natrona County is associated with a daycare and has lead to the quarantining of those who work there or attended there.  Additionally, the state has made four death announcements in five days.

This has resulted in the Governor cautioning residents of the state regarding letting recommended precautions lapse as if the virus no longer is a factor.  In Natrona County it lead to one of the county's health officer physicians expressing his overall disappointment on the same thing.

The state has additionally confirmed that six of the eleven deaths in the state are from the Wind River Indian Reservation, pointing to health conditions that are impacting the Reservation's residents at a higher rate than elsewhere.

In other news, not surprisingly, there's been a lot of countervailing news regarding the progress on a vaccine. There does appear to be real and genuine progress towards one being developed, and fairly rapidly.  In the meantime, however, one medical expert has expressed the opinion that SARS-CoV-2 will simply become endemic in the human population and the now living generation and generations to come will just have to live with it.

President Trump, it was announced, has been taking the anti malaria drug hydroxychloroquine.  It's not really known if this drug has an impact of preventing malaria or not.

There was debate this last week about the death toll so far, although that debate is a bit pointless in terms of its nature.  Reported deaths are over 80,000, meaning that no matter what a person's view is, its now killed more people than influenza this year in the U.S.  2020 has been a fairly bad flu year, but because the flu isn't tracked the same way that COVID 19 is, we don't really know how many people it has killed.  It's between 24,000 and 62,000, which means that this year infectious virus deaths are going to be extremely bad, rather obviously.

Interesting, a person has to wonder if the various shelter in place orders are also having a flattening impact on the flu.  It should be.

Be that as it may, the real death toll is almost certainly at least 100,000 and likely over that.

Oddly, as we approached that number comparisons to the Vietnam War, whose death toll was half that, have stopped.  They never made much sense anyhow, as wars aren't actually comparable to epidemics.

FWIW, about 40,000 Americans lost their lives in automobile accidents in 2019.  Because of the big decrease in driving right now, my guess is that for 2020 it will be lower.

In comparison to that, the number of murders in the U.S. in 2018, the last year I could find FBI data for, was 16,214 people, a figure that's likely to surprise people given that the press likes to give the impression that the US is awash in a sea of violence. That was down from the year prior, which has been a recent trend.  In spite of the common assumption of the opposite, it's likely that the murder rate will be lower again this year in my view.

This is also true, fwiw, of "gun deaths", a somewhat phone statistic.  The number of "gun deaths" of all types has declined every year since 1967 and in 2017 was 23,854 of which well over half were suicides.  I'm not saying that death by any means is somehow benign or to be ignored, but this figure, like others attributable to human causes, is going down, not up.

I'm also not saying that this means COVID 19 is not a big deal.  Indeed, these figures should show the opposite.  While we don't know how many people died of the flu this year, twice as many have died so far from COVID 19.

Brazil, we'd note, is now the pandemic hot spot.

This also, fwiw, plays a bit into misreporting.  The Press has done a very bad job regarding the spread of the disease and what it means in terms of statistics.  The suggestion has been, and the suggestion has been adopted here and elsewhere, that the United States is a disease mess and SARS-CoV-2 has been spreading through the country like wildfire at a far worst rate than anywhere else.  This has been based on the constant claim that the US has lead the world in infections.

Frankly, we don't know if that's true to start with as we really don't know the true infection rate in China, where the disease originated.  Additionally, the infection rate for a closed dictatorial country like China should be much lower than for an open society like the United States.

We unfortunately don't really even know the infection rate by percentage of the population for anywhere, due to the difficulty of detecting the disease in the overall population.  In sheer numbers the US leads with over 1.5M confirmed cases comparable to China's 84,000, but that's almost certainly misleading.  In confirmed cases, fwiw, Russia, which earlier claimed basically to have prevented it, comes in second at 317,000 cases.

But then by the same token Canada comes in just behind China with 81,000 cases. But if we accept China's total as real, that means the disease is much worse in Canada which has a much, much, smaller population.  Indeed, that would reflect a rampaging Canadian infection rate as compared to the China.

Anyhow, the disease is on the march in Brazil and we have to wonder how many other countries in the southern hemisphere as well as those in the less developed parts of the world have pretty high infection rates, and we just don't know it yet.

________________________________________________________________________________

May 23, 2020

This is Memorial Day weekend, generally an at least somewhat somber event, and this year particularly so.  We start with this news item from This Day In Wyoming's History, for yesterday, May 22, 2020.


2020  Governor Gordon orders flag's at half staff until Sunday, May 24, in honor of the victims of the Coronavirus.  The proclamation read:

Governor orders flags be flown at half staff statewide until May 24
in honor of the victims of the novel coronavirus pandemic
CHEYENNE, Wyo. - Governor Mark Gordon, pursuant to President Donald Trump's Proclamation, has ordered both the U.S. and State of Wyoming flags be flown at half-staff statewide until sunset on Sunday, May 24, 2020 in honor of the victims of the novel coronavirus pandemic.
The Presidential Proclamation follows: 

Our Nation mourns for every life lost to the coronavirus pandemic, and we share in the suffering of all those who endured pain and illness from the outbreak. Through our grief, America stands steadfast and united against the invisible enemy. May God be with the victims of this pandemic and bring aid and comfort to their families and friends. As a mark of solemn respect for the victims of the coronavirus pandemic, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, May 24, 2020. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred forty-fourth.


DONALD J. TRUMP

On a related note, the Wyoming Oregon Trail Veterans Cemetery in Evansville, Wyoming, cancelled its traditional Memorial Day event due to the desire to avoid a large crowd and the impossibility of complying with current crowd restrictions.


In the typical American fashion, Memorial Day is also a three day weekend and the traditional beginning of summer for Americans.  It usually features picknics and gatherings.  This year, the public ones have been closed.

Also notable, of course, its nature means its associated with religious services of various kinds. At this point a lot of churches are opening up in disregard of the present orders, although others with large structures are not fully open yet. In any event, President Trump entered the fray on this yesterday and classified churches as "essential" entities and urged Governors to open them back up, threatening to open them by Presidential fiat if they fail, although its doubtful that he has that power.

________________________________________________________________________________
Related threads update for May 21, 2020


The 2020 Special Legislative Session



Sunday Morning Scene. Churches of the West: Communion and the State. Wyoming dictates how the faithful will receive and what that reveals about what people understand and don't understand.



The End Is Here. The End Isn't Here. Coronavirus Extremes and really major news






Blog Mirror: Hiking in Finland; Staying Indoors, Coping With Anxiety & Depression



The Pandemic and Food, Part Three. A Good, Affordable, Steak


_________________________________________________________________________________

Related threads update for May 10, 2020



Related threads update for May 9, 2020

The Pandemic and Food, Part Two.


Burlington Northern to layoff 130 and to close two maintenance facilities in Wyoming.


Related threads update for May 5, 2020

Communications, Church, and COVID-10





Related threads update for April 30, 2020

Blog Mirror: The Dumbest Blog Ever; The Burden of Proof.



Related threads update for April 27, 2020

Trains, Planes and Automobiles. . . and the Coronavirus Pandemic


Why didn't you @#$@##$ close?





Related threads update for April 24, 2020


"Never let a crisis go to waste"


Related threads update for April 21, 2020

The USS Theodore Roosevelt. What happened, why it matters, and why the press dropped the ball.


Moving stuff around. The Pandemic


Related threads update for April 18, 2020

The Pandemic And The Table, Part 1.


Related threads update for April 10, 2020

On Edge. A Pandemic Reflection________________________

Related threads, update for April 7, 2020

The Pandemic and Change____________________

Related threads (not all of them), at the time of our April 6, 2020 publication of the original post.

Churches of the West: The Church and Pandemic.


Today In Wyoming's History: April 3. Governor Gordon Extends the Emergency and Puts In Place a Travelers Quarantine.


Today In Wyoming's History: March 28, 2020. Jackson shelters in place.


Governor, State Health Officer extend Statewide Public Health Orders through April 17


Shutting Everything Down. . . the dissenting informed voices.


Today In Wyoming's History: March 26, 2020. 


The Governor of Montana issues a Stay At Home Order


Today In Wyoming's History: March 25, 2020. 

Staying At Home, Orders and Suggestions.

Wet Markets. SARS, MERS, COVID 19, Pandemics. This will surely draw rebuke, and

Remembering how people work


Governor Gordon issues his Third Closure Order


You just know that this is going to end badly.


NYT: How the Virus Got Out


Random Takeaways from the Coronavirus Pandemic


Closing the door


Pandemic Ponderings


Panic


A Cornucopia of Coronavirus Questions


The Coronavirus Pandemic and the Free Society


Today In Wyoming's History: March 9


Common questions -Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Oh great. I've now seen the first television doctor comparing COVID 19 with the Spanish Flu. . .


Pandemic


Risk. Coronavirus, Influenza, and Other Scary and Not Scary Things.


The 2020 Election, Part 7


April 15, 2020 

And so now the Presidential election is in a new phase with just two candidates, one Republican and one Democrat.  And we have our long promised new thread as well.

The Presidential Campaign.

Well, actually that's not true at all, but that's how things will be perceived.  And as we're at that stage, we're starting a new thread.  And first things first, we'll address who is running.

The big two, as you already know, are incumbent President Donald Trump and presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

Will Americans go for the Joe they know, or play the Trump card?

Right now, as is obvious to everyone, this election season has gone seriously off the rails due to the COVID 19 Pandemic.  This has caused a virtual suspension in the campaign and we really don't know, at this point, when it'll effectively resume.  Biden has been attempting that with some success recently by way of video conferences and appearances on news shows.  Bernie Sanders recent concessions put him on the front pages again as well. Be that as it may, the real focus right now is elsewhere, and that's a real problem for Biden.  Like Trump's approach or not, he's in the news as a the horse in the middle of the stream, so to speak.  Can most people, by analogy, even name the Presidential candidates who ran against Roosevelt during World War Two?

Beyond that, a problem that's looming over Biden's campaign is right now its not about anything other than beating Trump.  Biden's a serious candidate and right now a lot of Democrats are in fact really united behind that goal, but that's a goal that's negative rather than positive. Any candidate at all would suffice for a goal of that type, and that's actually the literal position a lot of Democrats are taking.

An essential problem with that is that it really isn't a uniting position for general voters.  Voters who are concerned with specific issues are basically being told not to worry about them, and that Biden will get around to them later, or not.  If all Democrats want is a placeholder for four years, and it seems that is all that quite a few voters in fact want, that's fine.  The actual platform will be, more or less, "we intend to do nothing at all".  However, as we're now in a genuine crisis, a "I'll occupy this chair for four years and check in with you then" is a risky campaign theme.  Indeed, as there were already really serious issues around before the Coronavirus, it was anyhow.  People can say what they will about Trump, but he does have stated positions on a lot of things.

To compound the situation for Biden, all of a sudden there's Tara Reade.

In 2016 Biden faced problems based on accusations that he had inappropriately grabby hands in regards to women. The accusations, however, were based on just weird touching of hair and the like.  Reade has accused Biden of a species of sexual assault.

It's not like Trump hasn't been accused of bad behavior in this area as well, but the accusations against Biden are really creepy, if true (we'll not repeat them here).  The problem is that they allegedly took place in 1995 and so much time has now lapsed that analyzing them appears to be nearly impossible.  Reade, who was then an attractive young staffer whose beauty was of the thin 1970s variety unfortunately shares a name that's phonetically identical to that of the actress known in large part for portraying a sex object, most famously, perhaps in The Big Lebowski where she played Bunny Lebowski.  She first came up in the election when Sanders supporters started mentioning her back channel in a bit of a desperate effort to derail Biden in favor of Sanders, but now the story is fully in the press.  There are those who flat out now state that they won't vote for either candidate due to their alleged past with women, even though the story is certainly still not really full developed in regard to this story.

I'm going to forego commenting on the truth or accuracy of the story as I don't know it.  If true, as with the claims against Trump, the should be disqualifying for office.  Unfortunately, they come so late as to make determining their accuracy difficult and it can't be the case that a mere accusation should suffice to discount a person. False accusations do occur.

True accusations occur as well, and that's how things ought to be judged, if they can be.

Recently, of course, we've seen a bunch of these and they've acquired a peculiar role in our society.  Overwhelming evidence of creepy behavior and perhaps sexual assault derailed the career of Harvey Weinstein who is now going to prison on a conviction of sexual assault.  Claims against Brett Kavanaugh, which were widely circulated by Democrats, failed to prove to be true and he was confirmed to the Supreme Court but with a tainted reputation.  Accusations against Donald Trump don't seem to have mattered to voters and now we'll find out more about this as we move along in regard to Joe Biden.  As noted, some Democrats, largely those who had supported Sanders, claim that they now won't vote in the election at all as there are no untainted candidates.

Not voting at all presumes that there truly are only two candidates.  The race isn't purely a two person race, of course.  There are third party candidates out there and we'll mention them, probably most of them, maybe all of them, for the last time.  It's unfortunate, however, in that the views of the population would be much better reflected in government if there really were viable third parties.

The Third Parties

Before doing that we'd note that there are years in which third parties get a lot of attention.  2020 isn't going to be one of them.  Third parties are going to get no attention whatsoever this year, and their candidates really show that.  Indeed, this year in particular will be an all time low in the fortunes of third parties in terms of elections since the 1980s.  They're almost completely off the map.

American third parties can be divided into serious parties and, well. . .wackadoodle parties.  Neither is going to get any traction this year, but we'll divide them that way ourselves and take on the serious ones first.

The Serious Third Parties

Libertarian Party

The Libertarians are the largest American third party. They hold their convention on May 21, in Austin Texas. . . if they're able to hold it.  Their candidate in 2016 was former GOP Governor Bill Weld, who ran as a failed Republican contender this year and who isn't joining the Libertarian fold this year. That makes all of the Libertarian contenders more or less unknown.  None of them are getting much attention and none of them is going to. One is basically running as a joke.

Weld's in again and out again role in the party is really emblematic of how the party is essentially collapsing.  Based on a rather hard line view of "liberty", the party really long ago split into two camps, one being conservatives who regard themselves as libertarians, but who often take a fairly black and white view of the U.S. Constitution, and liberals who take a nearly anarchic view of personal liberty.  The gulf between the two camps is gigantic.  For them most part, the Republican Party has become the home of the conservative Libertarians, perhaps best represented by Rand Paul.  Given that there's no real way to reconcile their differing views, for the most part the Libertarians have gone into other parties and won't be coming back. They're still fielding candidates this year, but in reality, 2016 was likely the peak of their role as a party and my guess is that after this election they'll no longer qualify to be on the ballot in quite a few states.

One of the Libertarian candidates is also the candidate for another minor party, so we'll cover that here. The candidate is Howie Hawkins, who made news the other day by proclaiming that Sanders supporters should now vote for him as he's the one who really espouses their values.  He's also the candidate for the Socialist Party USA.

The fact that one of the Libertarian candidates is also a Socialist Party candidate demonstrates the gadfly nature of third parties which keeps them from being taken seriously even when they get well established.  A person can't be a Libertarian and a Socialist and that seriously can't be taken seriously as they stand for diametrically polar opposites.  The Libertarians may very well nominate Hawkins but if they do, they will have nominated a candidate that's as close to being the very thing they despise as possible.  If they do that, they'll no longer deserve to be in the category which we've put them this year.

Green Party

The Green Party convention is in July.  So,  like the Libertarians, they haven't chosen a candidate yet.
Also like the Libertarians, their candidate last time, Jill Stein, is sitting this year out so they're also running unknowns.  They may very well have also passed their apex.

The American Greens have a history of slipping to the extreme left and taking positions that have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with their claimed environmental emphasis, which keeps them from really becoming a significant party. They retain that emphasis, but they have a really bad track record of actually being able to proclaim it as they tend to take positions on things that divert that.  Having said that, in 2016 they drew a lot of attention in the race with Stein. This year they won't.

American Solidarity Party

The American Solidarity Party is a new party that drew some attention in 2016 for its effort to be a "third way" Christian Democratic Party, something the U.S. has never had but which a lot of European countries have.  It likely would have drawn little attention at that but the fact that it drew a fair number of Catholic thinkers to its fold who were disgusted with Trump and disgusted with the pro abortion policies of the Democratic Party caused it to receive some attention.  It managed therefore to get on the ballot as an established party in some places, including Colorado.

This year it has chosen California professor Brian T. Carroll and its Illinois Chairman Amar Patel as its candidates.  It would have been much better advised to reverse that order as a retired professor from California is a boring choice that's going nowhere whatsoever.  The party actually looked better in 2016 than it does in 2020, and if it keeps on this path, it won't be around in 2024.

This is a shame as, together with the Libertarian Party, the ASP is a party that should be drawing voters.  It's genuinely unique and a middle of the road party that's quite conservative on some things and quite liberal on others, showing that it's thought out a central theme on a philosophical basis.  For a new party, it did better than it should have in 2016 but my guess is that this year its gong nowhere at all.

Constitution Party

The Constitution Party is a very conservative party that tends towards a hard right penumbra reading of the Constitution that's often not justified by the text and history of the document. At the grass roots level it tends to assert positions that are often somewhat extreme.

The party is running coal executive Don Blankenship as its candidate this year.

This party has far less chance than normal, and it has no chances at all normally anyway, as Trump essentially occupied its field in 2016 and its supporters are largely gone.

Prohibition Party

It's hard to take the Prohibition Party seriously, I'll admit, but it's a party that once had fairly broad, if always minority, support.  With its former main issue, prohibition, long dead, and indeed the U.S. recently moving in the completely opposite direction, it's hard to believe that it's still around, but it is.

It's candidate this year is Phil Collins. This will be the last time you hear about this party here this year, I'm sure.

Reform Party

The Reform Party was a centrist party formed by Ross Perot for his Presidential bid in 1995.  It made a lot of news that year and was a serious third party that at one point some believed might be successful.

It wasn't, and like most third parties that come close and fail, it's nearly gone (anyone heard of the Bull Moose Party lately?).  It's candidate is Darcy Richardson.

A party like this, it should be noted, should be doing well as its a centrist party based on disgust with the Republicans and Democrats.  But it will receive no traction in the election at all.

Okay, now for the Wackadoodle Parties, of which there are a lot.

One thing that might be noted this year is the amazing flowering of a lot of tiny Socialist and even Communist Parties.  It's like being in a coffee shop in Berlin in 1919 to some extent.  Chances are high that most of the members of these parties would support any radical cause de jour, or on the other hand will turn into diehard Republicans or Democrats by the next election.

Bread and Roses Party

This is a minuscule "Socialistic" party whose founder, Jerome Segal, is its candidate.

This party stands no chance at all, but its interesting in that it shows the rise in popularity of Socialism in the United States, something that's actually extremely poorly understood by most of its supposed backers. The party named itself for the phrase used in a 1912 textile strike and tries to stand for "socialistic" things, but not socialism, and even claims its for limited government, which isn't possible with either of those things.

Like a lot of these fringe parties, this party has been careful to suggest its really supporting the Democrats, no matter what its otherwise doing.

Communist Party USA

The Communist Party USA had its heyday in the 1920s and 30s and its really just a lingering whacky element now.  It's running somebody, but it isn't even worth trying to figure out who that is.  FWIW, it's plat form this year is beating Trump, which no matter what they may think, sure doesn't mean the same thing for voters as voting the Communist Party into power.

Indeed, late in Bernie Sanders campaign he started to loose Democratic support due to his undefinsible statements about Communism being quasi nifty in some ways in Cuba.

Party for Socialism and Liberation

One thing about Socialist is that there's a million varieties of it, which always aids Socialist in explaining why all Socialist failures aren't really a condemnation of Socialist. They always represent "real" Socialism, which they maintain hasn't been tried.

There have been American Socialist Parties since the early 20th Century but they started fracturing in the 1910s and haven't stopped yet. This party is basically a Communist Party.  It's candidate is Gloria La Riva.  Leonard Peltier, currently serving two life sentences for murder, is her running mate.

Socialist Equality Party

What the crap, another Socialist party?  Well, of course.

This one is a Trotskyite Communist Party that is running Joseph Kishore.

Socialist Party USA

This Socialist Party is a Socialist, not a Communist, party, and its running libertarian Howie Hawkins, or maybe it's that Socialist Howie Hawkins is running as a Libertarian.

Well, never mind, this party is going nowhere and chances are that the Libertarians will suffer a net subtraction of support due to Hawkins.

Socialist Workers Party

The Socialist Workers Party is an old time Communist Party. Its running Alyson Kennedy as its candidate.  Like the Communist Party USA, it's day is long over.

Conclusion

This will be the strangest Presidential history in the lifetimes of any current voter.  Right now the Coronavirus Pandemic is the overarching theme and how well President Trump handles it, and the crash of the economy, will be the telling factor.  A hugely divisive personality, it's now those external crises that are first in the minds of the voters.  Factors that came up in the 2016 election and caused the Democratic Party to lurch left are now nearly completely mute and Trump is overseeing the largest expansion in the role of the government since the Second World War.  Factors that would have favored third parties getting at least some air time have now evaporated.  It's a two person race, but the issues are the effectiveness of what's going on currently and how that's perceived by voting public.  It's as if the race hasn't begun.

State Races




Aren't there some state races going on?

Why yes there are.

The big one is for the U.S. Senate seat being opened up by the retirement of Senator Enzi.  The contestants are:

Cynthia Lummis
Mark Armstrong
Joshua Wheeler
Robert Short

The Democratic candidates are:

Merav Ben-David
Chuck Jagoda
Yana Ludwig

The Republican primary winner is going to go on to be the Senator.  Cynthia Lummis basically  has that all sewn up now and her only real competition is Robert Short, a popular Converse County commissioner.  Short is very personable and easy to like, but Lummis has a history as a prior Congressman and that will be tough to beat.  The other two Republicans really don't figure into the race very much.

The Democratic nominee will lose in the General Election and right now its not clear who that nominee will be.  In practical terms, that choice will determine how unpopular the Democrats will be following the contest.  In Jagoda and Ludwig they have the opportunity to nominate candidates who would symbolize the far left end of the national party and, by extension, hurt their own party.  Jagoda probably isn't even eligible to run as he's a Californian. Ben-David is a University of Wyoming professor who stands no chance of winning, but who likely wouldn't hurt his party as the nominee.

The best thing that could happen for the Democrats would be if somebody else came in and declared, like Gary Trauner.  Probably no serious Democrat wants to be a sacrificial lamb, however.

And there's also a House of Representatives race, with Liz Cheney defending her seat.  She will win in the General Election.  The announced candidates are:

GOP:

Liz Cheney

Democratic Party:

Carol Hafner
Carl Beach.

Carol Hafner, who is a resident of South Dakota and clearly on the gadfly end of things.  From her based in South Dakota she last attempted to run in Alaska.  She's' on the party's far left and back marijuana legalization which, while it could come to Wyoming one way or another, isn't a winner of an issue for a House candidate.  Why she'd even bother to announce in Wyoming is a mystery.

Beach is a Wyoming native and has this nomination locked up unless another Democrat announces, a factor that he likely was well aware of when he chose to enter the race last week.  He's been involved in politics in a minor way before and was a Sanders supporter in 2016 when Sanders took the majority of Wyoming's caucus votes, but the party gave the election to Clinton anyway.  He's an educator who was born in Rawlins but who has split his time between Wyoming and overseas.  Forty four years old, he's personally attractive and should present well.  Irrespective of that there's no earthly way for him to beat Cheney.

Indeed Cheney, who really wasn't a universally popular candidate when she first ran, has grown into the job and has come more and more to take independent positions, sometimes breaking with President Trump (which always causes, oddly enough, a left wing Twitter storm when it occurs).  She apparently had her eye on the Senate seat and only reluctantly decided not to go for it after Lummis' election to that office became assured.  She'll have no difficulty retaining her seat.

Indeed, the overall state election really shows the sad state the Democrats have fallen into in the state.  Wyoming had a Democratic Congressman, Teno Roncolio, within the living memory of older voters, something that simply seems impossible now. The state retains some popular Democratic politicians, including former Governor Mike Sullivan, recent Democratic Gubernatorial candidate Mary Throne, and occasionally nearly successful businessman Gary Trauner, but it seems very unlikely that any of them will step forward to run.  And they can't be blamed as their chances are so extremely poor.  That fact, however, leaves the voters with no real choices and the races tend to feature candidates who fall to the extreme left whom don't seem to realize that they have no chance whatsoever and that they're further really damaging the reputation of their own party.  The further irony is that the lack of Democratic competition is hurting the GOP as well which has fallen to internal infighting as Republicans of the hard left don't see any reason that their party, which has traditionally been fairly independent and centrist in Wyoming, shouldn't go in that direction.  The further irony of that is that should that wing of the GOP be internally successful, which so far it has not been, it'd actually provide a strong incentive for the revival of the state's Democratic Party.

At any rate, if things continue in their present direction, the state race is basically over now.  Only the entry of a really well known Democrat into either state race, or a massively unforeseen event in the economy, is likely to alter that.

_________________________________________________________________________________

April 16, 2020

On this past Monday, former President Obama endorsed his former Vice President's run for the Oval Office by way of a video broadcast.  The text of his endorsement reads:












Hi, everybody. Let me start by saying the obvious: These aren’t normal times. As we all manage our way through a pandemic unlike anything we have seen in a century, Michelle and I hope that you and your families are safe and well.












If you have lost somebody to this virus or if someone in your life is sick, or if you are one of the millions suffering economic hardship, please know that you are in our prayers. Please know that you are not alone because now is the time for all of us to help where we can and to be there for each other as neighbors, as co-workers and as fellow citizens. In fact, over the past weeks, we have seen plenty of examples of the kind of courage, kindness and selflessness that we are going to need to get through one of the most difficult times in our history.
We both know that nothing is more powerful than millions of voices calling for change, and the ideas he has championed, the energy and enthusiasm he inspired, especially in young people, will be critical in moving America in a direction of progress and hope because for the second time in 12 years we will have the incredible task of rebuilding our economy, and to meet the moment, the Democratic Party will have to be bold.

You know, I could not be prouder of the incredible progress that we made together during my presidency, but if I were running today, I wouldn’t run the same race or have the same platform as I did in 2008. The world is different; there’s too much unfinished business for us to just look backwards. We have to look to the future. Bernie understands that, and Joe understands that. It is one of the reasons that Joe already has what is the most progressive platform of any major-party nominee in history. Because even before the pandemic turned the world upside down, it was already clear that we needed real structural change. The vast inequalities created by the new economy are easier to see now, but they existed long before this pandemic hit. Health professionals, teachers, delivery drivers, grocery clerks, cleaners, the people who truly make our economy run — they have always been essential, and for years too many of the people who do the essential work of this country have been underpaid, financially stressed and given too little support, and that applies to the next generation of Americans, young people graduating into unprecedented unemployment. They are going to need economic policies that give them faith in the future and give them relief from crushing student loan debt.
So we need to do more than just tinker around the edges with tax credits or underfunded programs. We have to go further to give everybody a great education, a lasting career and a stable retirement. We have to protect the gains we made with the Affordable Care Act, but it’s also time to go further. We should make plans affordable for everyone, provide everyone with a public option, expand Medicare and finish the job so that health care isn’t just a right but a reality for everybody.

We have to return the U.S. to the Paris agreement and lead the world in reducing the pollution that causes climate change, but science tells us we have to go much further and it is time for us to accelerate progress on bold new green initiatives that make our economy a clean energy innovator, save us money and secure our children’s future.

Of course, Democrats may not always agree on every detail of the best way to bring about each and every one of these changes, but we do agree that they are needed and that only happens if we win this election, because one thing everybody has learned by now is that the Republicans occupying the White House and running the U.S. Senate are not interested in progress.

They are interested in power. They have shown themselves willing to kick millions off their health insurance and eliminate preexisting condition protections for millions more even in the middle of this public health crisis, even as they are willing to spend a trillion dollars on tax cuts for the wealthy. They have given polluters unlimited power to poison our air and our water and denied the science of climate change just as they denied the science of pandemics. Repeatedly, they have disregarded American principles of rule of law and voting rights and transparency, basic norms that previous administrations observed regardless of party, principles that are the bedrock of our democracy.












So join us. Join Joe. Go to JoeBiden.com right now. Make a plan for how you are going to get involved. Keep taking care of yourself and your families and each other. Keep believing in the possibilities of a better world, and I will see you on the campaign trail as soon as I can. Thanks.
Some have regarded the endorsement  as coming rather late and frankly it did come so late as to really be symbolic more than anything else.  President Obama did nothing to help his former Vice President during the period where his campaign was in doubt, and frankly perhaps that makes sense.  By not saying anything until now, he reserved his statements for the party itself  Having said that, in spite of the widespread admiration that President Obama retains in the Democratic Party, the impact of the endorsement is probably minimal at best.

Yesterday Elizabeth Warren came in and also endorsed Biden.  It's interesting that she waited until Sanders did so first, removing all chance of Sanders being the 2020 nominee.  That also came earlier this week.

_________________________________________________________________________________

April 19, 2020

Joe Biden won Wyoming's write in Democratic caucus.

While not a major electoral event, it is interesting in that in 2016 Bernie Sanders took the majority of Wyoming's votes, which were then fixed via the operation of the super delegates so that the state went for Clinton in the Democratic convention.  That showed at the time how popular Sanders was and how engineered, in a way, the Democratic process was.

This year Wyoming's vote shows how far Sanders' fortunes fell.  It was unlikely that he was ever going to take the state this year.

_________________________________________________________________________________

April 28, 2020

New York's Democratic Party,  noting that this point its primary had become a "beauty contest", cancelled it, given the COVID 19 pandemic.

In other news, Jessie Ventura, one time Governor of Minnesota and former professional wrestler, indicated that he was "testing the waters" of a Green Party run.

_________________________________________________________________________________

April 29, 2020

This is an election year that ought to be conducive to third parties.   I know that up earlier in this post I indicated you wouldn't be hearing about the third parties, probably, again before November, here, but that was only a probably.  Now you are hearing about them again.

The reason for that is that all of a sudden people are contemplating serious runs via third parties.

Now, that is likely something that the present third party candidates would find to be an insulting statement, but up until yesterday there were no third party candidates who could really be taken seriously. The Libertarian who has received the most press, for example, is also a Socialist, a political position that makes just about as much sense as being an Anarcho-Monarchist or a Constitutionalist Trotskyite or something.  It doesn't make sense and hence the candidate at an existential level also doesn't make sense, and is not to be taken seriously.  To make matters worse, the one new party in 2016 that was really interesting, the American Solidarity Party, is running two undoubtedly super nice people who have authored an article recently proposing a Jubilee in the Biblical sense, i.e., wouldn't it be nice if, like in ancient Israel (where it happened every seven years) all debts were forgiven, which may in fact be a nice thought but which doesn't seem to grasp that economics and finances have really changed over the past three millennia.

And all this in a year in which third parties really ought to have a chance, as noted, but which bears repeating.

Why would that be true?


Well President Trump has never received over a 50% approval rating at any time and, now seemingly forgotten, he received less than the majority of the American vote in 2016.  He was so unpopular within the GOP itself that there were, at first "Never Trumpers" in the party who vowed not to cooperate with him, although they fell in line, in no small part as they came to see what was at least the temporary wisdom (the long term effects are yet to be known) of Mitch McConnell's logic that Trump's victory could be used to accomplish a lot that the GOP hadn't been able to get done.  Indeed, McConnell is pretty crafty so it may be the case that he really didn't ever expect Trump to last more than one term, he hoped to get a lot done that would stick to Trump if unpopular but would be difficult to undo, and the establishment wing of the party would reestablish post Trump.  Indeed, that's my guess on his thinking.

Whatever it is, Trump has never been popular except in his base, where he's very popular.  Otherwise, a lot of Republicans feel pretty lukewarm about him at best, and some outright dislike him.  A large group of quasi Republicans that voted for him have loose attachments to him at best, and ironically are in the same political demographic that also likes Sanders.

Trump managed to overcome that in 2016 but he's been in trouble since that election due to the huge unparallelled negative reaction to him in the Democratic Party. We'll get to that in a moment, but if a new election had been held in December 2016, he'd likely have lost.

Trump has counted on the economy to carry him through in 2020, as well as McConnell's work on conservative causes, but now the economy is tanking massively due to the Coronavirus Pandemic.  Added to that, Trump has been at least somewhat under the microscope due to the Pandemic and has received a lot of criticism because of it.  I'd argue that very little of the criticism has hit in the public until perhaps last week, when hsi comments at a daily briefing provoked a large response due to their being such dangerous bad advice.  He briefly indicated that he wasn't going to do daily press briefings anymore, which is something that his staff has urged forever, but he didn't carry through with that.  At any rate, his comments hurt him and that damage may stick, if the Democrats exploit it.

All of which should mean the Democrats have a lot to exploit, as indeed they do.


But their candidate is Joe Biden.

Indeed, Democratic rank and file comfort with Biden is what caused him to surge and knock out the other candidates.  Declared a lost cause, he proved not to be, and overcame what was perceived at the time to be the inevitable victory of Bernie Sanders.  But there's a real weakness in this.

The Democrats turned hard left right after the 2016 election.  Biden isn't hard left, and he should start driving back to the middle, but it's unclear if he will.  If he drives to the left, he's going to scare independants and reluctant Trump supporters in the GOP, who may be willing to vote for their candidate rather than endure the thought of AOC being in the White House every day.

Indeed, Democratic leadership itself isn't inspiring for most non Democrats.  Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are ancient and disliked and a party that had a sound base would replace them for somebody half their age.  But they don't, suggesting the base is pretty thin.

And Biden himself has problems, some old, some new.

One is that Biden just has a tendency to come across as oddly goofy and not very smart.  A lot of this is apparently attributable to a youthful stuttering problem that's still with him. Such things are difficult to overcome and they tend to be misinterpreted by the public.  George Bush the younger had a speech problem as well, except apparently when he spoke in Spanish, that was similarly misinterpreted.  Because of their respective peculiar speech styles and public address, people with keen ears for speech are likely already dreading the though of a lot of Biden and Trump political discourse to come.

Maybe it won't come. Because of the Coronavirus this campaign is throwing back to pre 1900 conditions in which the candidates don't travel.  Biden occasionally issues statements, Trump just keeps on working at his job. That's just like what races in earlier times were like.  Maybe it'll stay nearly that way, which would be okay.

But it probably won't, and that means that at some point we'll start getting a lot of public speech and it'll almost certainly be occasionally odd from both men.

And to add to that, Biden now has Tera Reade.

When the Reade problem surfaced I didn't pay much attention to it, but now a person has to as it is getting a lot of press.  Some Democrats have indicated that they flat out won't support Biden because they are certain that Reade was assaulted by Biden.  Over time, the circumstantial evidence of that occurring has developed, but so has the circumstantial evidence that it didn't, and I'm not drawing any conclusions at all.

Nonetheless, this presents a real problem for Democrats as they've exploited such problems with other figures recently, the most notable being Brett Kavanaugh.  The Democrats have repeatedly taken the position that ot discount the accusation is to discount women in general, and now they cannot do the same as Reade.  So the accusations have to be given attention, and that has to come now.  Because of the age of the accusations, finding out the truth will be difficult at best, but as noted its slowly becoming evident that Reade at least complained of something to some people, but was silent to other people you'd expect to have said something, way back when.

Trump of course has his own problems in this area which once again, in an odd way, brings up the antiquity of the candidates.  As with Kavanaugh, there's a lingering sense that all of these men came up into their own in the post 1960s, post Sexual Revolution, pre 1990s, "boys will be boys" era in which the taint of the Revolution gave license to men to act their worst.  I'm not saying that any of these men acted that way.  I don't know.  I'm only noting that the problem exist.

All of which means that candidates from somewhere else, ought to do okay.

One of them I've already mentioned, that being Jesse Ventura, who is pondering running as a Green. That no doubt surprises some people as he has at least some prior non Green statements, but as we've also seen this year the older third parties aren't adverse to running candidates of convenience.  I can't see Ventura's bid being successful, but the fact that he's suddenly in the news does show something is going on.

Now Justin Amash is back in the news and it's pretty clear that he's going to run as a Libertarian.

Amash comes by that affiliation honestly as he was always really a Libertarian, even though he was elected to Congress as a Republican.  He'll likely get their nomination.

He's not likely to win for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that third party candidates just don't win.  Beyond that, the ultimate irony of the 2020 election right now is that the populist Trump is presiding over the most socialist set of economic programs the country has seen since the emergency measures of the Great Depression.  This would make a Libertarian surge this year surprising, to say the least, as its hard to see their economic platform being popular in this atmosphere.

Indeed, it really makes a person wonder what would happen if a candidate who really espoused ideas that are now fully in action was in the race.  That candidate would be Andrew Yang, about which there was some speculation on whether he'd mount a third party bid earlier on.  Yang discounted that at the time and he's endorsed Joe Biden, but the 45 year old Yang would make a lot more sense as the Green Party candidate than the 68 year old Jesse Ventura.  Indeed, if Yang were to run as a Green he'd be the first serious Presidential candidate the party ever had and he could do so honestly as the positions he held in the Democratic primary were in fact largely ones that the Greens espouse or would espouse.

None of which means that Ventura or Amash are going anywhere.  My predictions are they won't.  My further prediction, however, is that if the 40 year old Amash actually becomes any sort of serious threat in the election, and if that happened soon, we would seen Yang back in the race in some sort of a "draft Yang" pretext.  And if that occured, it would actually be possible that a four way split in the vote could leave any one of the four men in the Oval Office.

Indeed, the problems that Biden and Trump now have are such that third party runs this year should be serious problems for both candidates. But they will prove not to be, and both Ventura and Amash's campaigns will go down in minor voting defeat, providing another lesson on how inviolate the two party system is.  It'd really take a well known maverick from the existing two parties to mix this up, but that's unlikely to occur.  Indeed, the crisis that the country is enduring is likely to focus attention on the knowns more than ever, and the current knowns are the two septuagenarian candidates.

_________________________________________________________________________________

May 1, 2020


Tara Reade in 1993 at age 29.

Rising press attention to Tera Reade's claims of being the victim of a sexual assault at the hands of Joe Biden back in 1993 caused Biden to finally come out with a formal denial of the claims.

Biden's failure to address them to date can be read more than one way, but the most likely explanation for them is that by addressing them he can't help but accidentally push them into the forefront  Failing to address them up until now was the wise course of action, as addressing them now also was.

None of this resolves the issue and the story will go on. But how it will go on is now the question.

Similar accusations against Bill Clinton did not derail his campaign for the Presidency back in, ironically, 1992, which actually plays into this a bit in terms of atmosphere.  That was before, of course, the Me Too movement seemingly redirected public attention in this area.  Also before that really got completely rolling, similar accusations did not derail the campaign of Donald Trump in 2016.

An accusation of being crassly in appropriate did cause Al Franken to have to resign however in 2018 for conduct that was much less extreme (which is not to state that the claims against Biden are true).  The rise of the Me Too movement lead to the rapid downfall of Harvey Weinstein who of course was accused of serial icky conduct and whose fall would have likely have come in any era once exposed.  Claims against Brett Kavanaugh nearly kept him from rising to the Supreme Court that same year.

The Kavanaugh case is Biden's problem.  Democrats demanded an inquiry on Kavanaugh even though there appeared to be ample reason to doubt his accuser, who became accusers.  Furthermore, the passage of time made the investigation of the claims against him difficult at best.  Those demands, however, set the political bar with the position that the accusations were nearly proof of the claims and should be treated as such to some degree.  Franken's fall amplified that.  Franken's claims were submitted to a Senate process that resulted in his being investigated with the Democrats participating on that, as they had little choice but to do.

Now, however, Joe Biden is in the same uncomfortable position.

And that uncomfortable position has, as a strong element of it, that the Democrats have taken the position pretty consistently that a "right to be heard" presupposed a duty to believe, which truly are not the same things.  Biden himself took that position in regard to Kavanaugh, and as he took it there, he can't help but have it apply here.

Now, of course, a critical difference in the cases of Biden and Trump, vs. Franken and Kavanaugh, is that they were subject to different processes.  Franken and Kavanaugh were in positions where official investigations were appropriate as they were either office holders or seeking Senatorial confirmation for a position.  Biden and Trump, however, are appealing to the voters.

Which gets us to the next thing  The accusations, no matter their merits or demerits, didn't seem to impact the voters in 2016 and its frankly unlikely that they will now, which raises the question of the more vague judgment of the voters in this area is a good thing or a bad thing.
_________________________________________________________________________________

May 5, 2020

To my surprise, the Tara Reade story is getting traction.  A former neighbor of Reade's has now come forward to support her, claiming that Reade had told her the story about in the mid 90s and was emotionally upset at the telling.

That sort of development really isn't surprising. That's how these events always play out. That doesn't mean that Reade is telling the truth or that the neighbor is.  Indeed, given the way human memory works, they could be flat out wrong and still not be lying, although if they aren't flat out wrong and still aren't lying, that would suggest that Biden did something, if not commit a type of sexual assault.

And the other thing that is now occurring is that Biden is tied up in the topic of releasing records, which is going to be a diversion until it occurs.

My sense is that given the passage of time and the apparent actions of Reade at the time, if something really occurred, any existing records are not going to show anything and that this will not derail Biden's campaign.  Having said that, it is going to drain off some votes.

All of that, of course, assumes that records really aren't there which would show anything, which is the high likelihood.  If the opposite is true, this will end up derailing everything.

Meanwhile, the Administration is politicising the pandemic to some degree by asserting that China is morally culpable for the outbreak. The U.S., it should be noted, isn't alone in this in that Australia is also doing the same and appears to be doing so fairly seriously.  The gist of the claims right now are as follows:

Nationally, the Administration is asserting that the Chinese bear fault for the Pandemic.  Secretary Pompeo stated on This Week that the virus is natural, i.e., not man made, which reflects the scientific consensus but he also claimed that it had escaped a Chinese lab.  The Administration is also asserting that the Chinese acted to cover up the developing epidemic in their country so that they could hoard supplies for their own people.

This comes at a time in which there's a feeling in the Administration that the formerly good economy, which had been what the Trump Administration was pinning is reelection hopes on, will not recover prior to the Fall, which seems to have been a hope, if almost somewhat desperate hope, in the Administration.  As that becomes increasingly unlikely, the Administration is turning its political attention to the PRC.  In the background, both diplomatically and militarily there's been increasing attention to the Chinese for at least a decade or more, so this is a development of a preexisting trend.
_________________________________________________________________________________

May 8, 2020

Biden accuser Tara Reade has asked, which is really more of a demand, that Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race.

More and more has been published about this accusation, not surprisingly, over time.  It turns out that early on Ms. Reade was talking to a variety of reporters and at least some held their stories as it evolved. While the custom has become to insist that the stories of accusers not be questioned, the evolution of Reade's makes it difficult not to do so.  The full blown sexual assault aspect of it is very recent, and early on nothing of that type was claimed.  She has supporters who claim to have been told the story early on, but such accusers nearly always do.

Reade is a Sanders supporter and her story has evolved during the history of the Democratic campaign.  Now she's demanding Biden withdraw from the race.  What would occur if that were to happen is unclear, but presumably his delegates would be freed and chosen delegates would go on to the convention, with all of them not yet fully chosen.  Sanders has the only organization capable of getting back up to speed and its not unreasonable to wonder if he'd be the nominee.

Nobody wants to believe that somebody would make up a claim of rape over something like this, but that's the uneasy reality. Some will do that. We don't know that to be the case here, but we should wonder about the unverifiable claims that have come on some controversial public figures dating back to Justice Thomas.  It seems unimaginable that some would tell lies in order to bring down a public figure, but some will.

We can't know and never will what is going on here.  But those who doubt Reade's story have good reason for doing so.

_________________________________________________________________________________

May 11, 2020

We've reported before about infighting in the State's GOP.  Over the weekend it seemed to come to a head again.

An effort was made to block 59 of the Natrona County GOP's delegates from participating in the convention, which has been one of the counties that has not gone along with efforts to require unity in the party which has seen increased adherence to a certain type of conservatism. The effort failed, but not by much.  It had been passed as a resolution by the credentials committee.

The dispute came about as Natrona County's party enlisted the aid of the County Clerk's office to assist in voting that took place at the online meeting.  While voting at the meeting has now been subject to real questions in general, Natrona County's actions violated the rules that has been set out before hand and that nearly cost the county its position in the state convention.

The vote may have failed as well known Republicans in the state opposed it. Former Congressman Barbara Cubin called the party dysfunctional and compared its actions to the Politburo.  Cubin was seeking the position of the party's treasurer and lost to Harriet Hageman during the online gathering.  The vote generally resulted in the conservatives retaining their positions, or acquiring them, apparently.

Voting at the gathering has proven to be controversial with there being complaints it was done improperly and that a significant number of votes were not counted or given time to be counted.  Notably significant conservatives of the stripe currently running the party won positions while well known names countering them, with significant endorsements, failed in their challenges.  The voting was even criticized by at least one of the well known conservatives who noted that he received a ballot when he should not have.

The infighting has been discussed here before but it generally pits a type of tea party conservatism which has gained a large measure of control over the state's party against the old style Wyoming Republicans.  The latter remain numerous in the Natrona County and Laramie County branches of the party.  The irony is that that they reflect a larger percentage of average Republicans, most of whom don't participate in the party actively.  Indeed, one of the complaints of the party leadership is that a lot of Republicans, in its view, are actually crossover Democrats.

The Democratic Party has been all but dead in Wyoming since the Clinton years but efforts like this are causing some of the rank and file to really question the party. Gumblings like those made by Cubin can be heard among some average party members who are dismayed by the infighting and who don't support the hardline efforts. So far it hasn't lead to the party's overwhelmingly dominate position in the state from being challenged but as this keeps on it will have to start to have a detrimental impact in the party of some sort.

_________________________________________________________________________________

May 13, 2020

AOC announced that she's on the Biden campaign's climate team.

Ocasio-Cortez is of course a controversial figure who had supported Sanders from early on and who was late to endorse Biden.   The position may signal an effort by Biden to win the support of her followers or may be genuine.  It'll be a lightning rod of sorts for some of Biden's opponents, but the extent to which it will influence undecideds in any fashion is a pretty open question.

Joe Biden himself appears to be getting set to attempt to run the first "front porch" campaign since William McKinley's last run, and McKinley had Theodore Roosevelt running around to help him at the time.

What the plans are, right now, is to run a principally cyber campaign, something that's never been tried.  In that context the support of figures who draw a lot of news attention, and Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez does that, may prove to be an asset for drawing attention, much like Roosevelt was.

While it still remains news, the Tara Reade story has gone from being a prime headline getter to back pages at this point.  The longer the story ran and the more it tended to change, the less credible it appeared, and it seems that its now past the point of being more than a distraction.

While polls at this point are of dubious value, to say the least, Biden is leading in swing states and there's now real concern that a Trump defeat will swing the Senate to the Democrats.

Swings in Congress have been a recurring story during this election.  Early on there was some suggestion that the GOP might gain in the House to the point of actually recovering it. That now is widely acknowledged to be impossible.  There was also a period in which there was concern in the GOP over down ballot Republicans, but that went away, only to revive and now be there once again.  Biden has made taking the Senate a feature of his campaign.

One place the reverse is happening is in Katie Hill's California Congressional District where Mike Garcia is ahead in returns over Christy Smith.  The special election, held yesterday, came about as Hill had to resign after explicit photographs of her were released.

I frankly never understood why Hill resigned in the first place.  Hill is an admitted bisexual and I don't know what the photos, released by a conservative blog, showed. She's admitted to have been in an "inappropriate" relationship with a male staffer, but frankly at this point in time, so what?

The so what part, apparently, is related to this being against the House Rules, the conduct with the staffer that is, after such a rule was passed as part of the MeToo Movement.

I don't approve, I'd note, of such conduct nor do I approve of revenge porn or sabotage porn or whatever category the release of the photographs was.  And I don't approve of her personal conduct. But at this point all it really does is serve to shed light on a general level of hypocrisy in the country in general.  If she's resigning, it shouldn't be because of a rule, but because people shouldn't do what she did, including being photographed nude, and that rule and rules to address that, ought to apply to everyone.  If they don't, she shouldn't be made to resign, and I don't think she should have.

Garcia is an example of something that I've noted here before, but which I've only heard a national pundit mention once.  He's a first generation American Hispanic who served in the Navy as a pilot. His father was a Los Angeles policeman.  He's married and has two children. Hill was a white Democrat with a messy personal life.  Smith was also a white candidate and was endorsed by Hill.

So what, you might ask?

Well, what this shows is that the long held Democratic belief that all Hispanic voters are perpetually Democrats is way off base.  In fact, Hispanics have only voted as Democrats largely for the same cultural identify and poverty reasons that the Irish and Italians once did.

Indeed, as a demographic, Hispanics look a lot like prior generations of Italians and Irish, who became Italian Americans and Irish Americans, except they're doing it more quickly.  Those earlier demographics married within their own ethnicities for a long time and retained strong ethnic identities as their economic fortunes rose.  Hispanics have intermarried, like Garcia, much more quickly and therefore their ethnic identity has not remained as strong as their economic fortunes rose.

Of course, in terms of economic eras, we're still very much in the entry stage of the Hispanic story. But Garcia shows plainly what the Democrats have simply refused to see. As a culture, Hispanics are much more conservative than the white Democratic base and once their economic fortunes begin to rise, and they very much have, they're highly unlikely to remain Democrats.  In this race the young Republican former Navy pilot, running on "the Constitution, Capitalism and Competition", is going to soundly defeat the Democratic Party of Hill/Smith, which seems strangely mired in the messy battlefield detritus of the Sexual Revolution and not standing for much.  Hill was basically a casualty of that Revolution and now will be remembered for not being able to keep her clothes on.  Garcia is likely to be remembered as one of the first of what will become a large number of Hispanic conservatives to start to reach high office.  He's more likely to be the face of Hispanic candidates of the future than AOC.

_________________________________________________________________________________

May 21, 2020

Joe Biden won the Oregon primary earlier this week.

This is, of course, not a surprise, but it should be part of the posts here.

Within the past week the Democratic Party has decided to make health care the focus of its 2020 campaign.

FWIW, I disagree with the common national assumption that health care is a really huge deal with most American voters.  It undoubtedly is with some, but I don't think it ever has been with most of them, most of the time.  Young voters aren't really focused on it the way that the Democrats tend to think they are.  Older voters already have a government supported system in Medicare.  That leaves the middle, but in normal times that means that a lot of people actually worry about people messing with their employer provided plans, although there are fewer of those than there used to be.

The question this year is whether the Coronavirus and the massive recession its causing change that calculation.  It might.

Traditionally American voters have made big changes in directions during periods of crisis, the Great Depression providing perhaps the best example.  Things were done during the Depression that never would have been done in regular times.  The longer the Coronavirus Recession goes on, and the deeper it becomes, that may be true again.

The Democrats are starting to count on that, which builds on the fact that President Trump's real strength with voters outside of his base was on the economy.  Now the economy is in major distress and the question becomes to what extent that erodes his support.  It might not, on the basis that people probably aren't inclined to blame the recession on him, given the obvious role of the virus, but they might as well simply because that's a common thing to do during times of crisis.

Added to that, even if they aren't inclined to blame Trump for the recession, many voters may now feel that his prior record on the economy isn't relevant to what's current happening and that his record otherwise doesn't attract them.  It will attract some, to be sure, who have other issues which they give him credit for success on.  But for others it's likely that the problems the pandemic has brought, including the health care insurance loss that's associated with the loss of employment, will be paramount.  To many others who don't watch individual issues on a close basis, it will seem that he has no record.

That presents a real opportunity for the Democrats, and not just in the Presidential election, but down ballot as well.

Of course, it also present a classic problem for the Democrats as their internal argument will be how much to use the crisis to advance an overall left leaning agenda.  They'd be wise to be restrained but they've had a hard time doing that recently.

In any event, right now, Biden is leading in the polls, but it may well be way too early to give too much credit for polls.  The next major news flurry he'll receive is when he picks a vice presidential candidate.  He'd be wise not to do that too soon, however, as once he does attention is really going to focus on that person, particularly given the relatively high chances that whoever is the VP will end up being the President within the next four years due to the impact of natural aging, let alone natural aging in a stressful position, no matter which Presidential candidate wins.  Biden's VP stands a really good chance of being a lightening rod if that choice is well known.
_________________________________________________________________________________

May 23, 2020

The Tribune featured an article on a new candidate for the Senate, Donna Rice.

When this thread was first started a month ago, the Senatorial candidates that had been announced in the GOP were:

Cynthia Lummis
Mark Armstrong
Joshua Wheeler
Robert Short

So now there's a fifth Republican candidate according to the Tribune, although that story wasn't quite up to date.

Rice is an unknown to Wyoming voters and her biography notes that she left Wyoming "several decades ago" to attended law school after graduating from UW, but her heart always remained in Wyoming and now she's back with her husband who are working on establishing a business.  The paper's article is, unfortunately, devoid of useful details otherwise.  While Rice was a lawyer, apparently, in Indiana, we're not even informed what kid of business she intends to operate here.

We're really not that well informed by the article on how her positions are different from Lummis'.  If they aren't in some notable way, her campaign will be completely pointless as running on having moved back to a state you left decades ago and then running for the U.S. Senate isn't an attractive platform.  A review of what little information Rice has up on her sites reveals that she's a very conservative pro-Trump candidate whose positions really aren't distinguishable, in print, from those of Lummis.  If that's the case, her campaign will go nowhere against another female lawyer who didn't leave the state to find work and who has been in the U.S. House.

One of the interesting things about what we're seeing in the GOP is that candidates tend generally, but not always, to run to the right of the front runner. We saw this pretty prominently in the Gubernatorial race in 2018 in which all of the candidates trying to beat front runner Gordon ran to the right of him.  The one candidate that didn't, at first, was Galeotos, who came around to that position and wrapped himself around Trump's flag.

Galeotos's effort sank his campaign, which should sound a cautionary bell for candidates this go around. There seem to be a general feeling that the state is so solidly pro Trump that associating yourself with Trump equals election. That's probably an incorrect assumption as what the races have actually tended to demonstrate is that the rank and file of the GOP remains conservative but independant, where as its leadership, on a county by county basis, tends to align in most instances with the President.

Lummis has strongly associated herself with Trump in the campaign and, as noted, is a woman lawyer who stayed in the state.  Basing a campaign on nearly the exact same issues but having left hte state for your career doesn't really make your campaign stand out.

One additional thing Rice is doing is noting that she's a Christian.

Most of the candidates who are running, if not all, in the GOP state races are Christians.  What this trend actually reflects is that a person holds conservative positions on social issues based on their Christian faith. There's nothing really wrong with doing this but its become very notable in since 2018.

In actuality, the field is beyond five at this point. The actual announced candidates, so far, are:

Cynthia Lummis
Mark Armstrong
Joshua Wheeler
Robert Short
Bryan E Miller
Patrick Dotson
John Holtz
Michael Kemler
Star Roselli
Donna Rice

I frankly don't know who a lot of these entries are.  Roselli is from Arizona and therefore that campaign is going nowhere. 

Miller is a retired Air Force officer who is running to the right of Lummis.

Holtz ran for Senate in 2018 and is trying again.

I can't tell you much about the remaining candidates, and chances are that during the election, you won't hear much about them.

In the Democratic field, the candidates are now:

Merav Ben-David
Chuck Jagoda
Yana Ludwig
James Kirk DeBrine
Kenneth R. Casner
Rex Wilde

If some of these names seem familiar, beyond the first three who have been announced for some time, that's because some of them have run before.  Whichever one becomes the Democratic nominee is going to lose to the Republican nominee, who is almost guaranteed to be Lummis.

The House race has expanded a bit as well, although Liz Cheney is sure to win it.  Cheney now has competition from Blake Stanley.

Stanley, like Rice, is running to the right of Cheney, who in fact has shown some independence in the House and who has risen to the status of being a major House figure.  Stanley also ran in 2018 and lost.  By this time, Cheney's position is fairly cemented to there's little chance that he will do better in 2020.

In the Presidential race Tara Reade's lawyer, who was associated with the Me Too movement, dropped her as a client  In doing so, he was careful to note that this doing so in no way reflected on whether her accusations against Biden are truthful, but then unless an attorney wanted to be sued for breach of the attorney client privilege, he'd have to say that.  That doesn't mean that is why he and Reade parted company, however.

Biden was in the news for another reason, that being one of his odd verbal gaffes in which, while being interviewed on a show with a largely black audience, for saying of blacks who support Trump that they "ain't black".

This will be something that goes nowhere, but it does point out that Biden is unusually prone to verbal gaffs and that some of them are downright odd. This is likely to become an unwelcome feature of this campaign to the extent it already isn't.

The Trump campaign spent some time last week trying to focus on the use of improper FBI techniques in regard to Gen. Flynn.  This story is also not likely to go anywhere and whatever occured it does not appear, as the President spent some time suggesting, that former President Obama did anything illegal, nor does it solve the basic problem that Flynn lied to the FBI.  It does point out, however that the Trump campaign, faced with a massive Coronavirus downturn in the economy and the pandemic itself, is feeling the heat of the polls, which show him behind with little way out.  There's still a long ways to go, of course, but the campaign was heavily relying upon a strong economy which no longer exists.
_________________________________________________________________________________

A note on the colors.

Observant readers will note the inclusion of some colored text above.

The colors here are in the internationally traditional color scheme for political parties; red for the left and particularly for socialist parties, blue for the right, orange for Christian Democratic parties, yellow-gold for Libertarians, and green for Greens.

That doesn't square with the incredibly ignorant color scheme foisted upon the nation by some dimwit national television network several years ago.  The first person I recall using that color scheme is Chuck Todd, although I don't know that he came up with it.  I'm blaming it on Chuck, however, whose fails to generally live up to the standards that should apply to his occupation and who should accordingly be relegated to a third rate television market with a viewership of five.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Prior related threads.

The 2020 Election, Part 1

The 2020 Election, Part 2

The 2020 Election, Part 3

Friday, May 22, 2020

May 22, 1920. Carranza's Assassination hits the news, and Bergdoll's Departure. The Belmont Run, and Federal Employees get to Retire.

Postman, May 22, 1920.


The dramatic news that Carranza, who had been such a large figure in the Mexican Revolution, and the American Press, had been assassinated hit in the U.S.


Also taking headlines was the flight of Grover Cleveland Bergdoll, a millionaire draft dodger.


Bergdoll had first been in the press as a pre World War One aviator, showing that he at least had an element of personal courage.  But when the war came, he skipped his draft physical and evaded the authorities for two years.  He was finally arrested in January, 1920.


He was tried and convicted, and then oddly allowed out of prison when he claimed the need to recover a cache of gold he'd buried while a fugitive.  On a stop at his home in Philadelphia, while under guard, he managed to escape and flea with his chauffeur. 

He went, oddly enough, to Germany, where he further avoided attempts to kidnap him by American soldiers of fortune on two occasions, killing one of them.  He returned to the United States twice while a fugitive and even toured a bit on one occasion.  He finally surrendered to authorities in 1939 and served the remainder of his term plus added time, being released in 1944.  He remained under psychiatric care until his death in 1966.

The Belmont was run on this day in 1920.

United Hunts Racing Association meet at Belmont Park Terminal track, May 22, 1920.

Beatrice Clafin and M.M. Van Beuren at the United Hunts Racing Association meet at Belmont Park Terminal track, Belmont, New York, May 22, 1920.

The Civil Retirement Act went into effect on this day, providing retirement for employees of the United States government.  

We're so used to thinking of this as always having existed we fail to appreciate that in fact a century ago retirement was not only not a sure thing, it was contrary to the norm.