Sunday, October 27, 2019

Best post of the week of October 20, 2019.

The best posts of the week of October 20, 2019.

What about meat? Lex Anteinternet: Foods, Seasons, and our Memories. Part 3. A Hundred Years Ago.


The election north of the border. The 2019 Canadian Election.


The Telephonic Fifth Degree


Librarian, Kentucky 1936.



The Clearance Dilemma

The 2007 Dodge in the high country.

I have a 2007 Dodge 3500 4x4.  It's the crewcab with a long box.

It's a great truck and I have no intention of trading it away any time soon, even though my wife feels that I should be trading it in, and even though there are a few valid reasons to do so.*  Indeed, I have no intention whatsoever of getting any new vehicles in the future whatsoever.

It's been a great truck.  It's had a few problems over the years, as they all do, but by and large, as a vehicle with 180,000 miles now on it, it's been remarkably trouble free.  As I'll post here shortly in another thread, it's also been a very safe one.  It preforms very well, in that context, on highway ice and snow, and I've had it on some dicey roads to say the least.  There are things that it doesn't compare favorably to in regard to newer trucks, but there are things it compares more favorably with, in my view.  For one thing, it has a standard transmission, something which is now a thing of the past with American full sized trucks. Automatics, the favorite of urban dwellers, have taken over.

But there's one thing.

As a very long, and stock, vehicle, it doesn't have the kind of clearance that I'd like.

Another 07 in a parking lot, photographed from the cab of my 07.  This one has about the perfect tire size in my view, and is leveled (not lifted) about 2".  It looks great and has better clearance than mine.  Of course, he isn't towing any stock trailers either.  I wish I'd run up and taken a photo of the tire size.

I've whacked rocks with the front differential and slightly dented it.  And I've high centered it on snow nearly annually.

I'm tempted to try to boost the clearance, and that would mean larger tires.

It came equipped with 265/70R17s, and I have an off road (that will also do highway) example of that on now.  That tire is 31.5" in width.  It will, as is, go up one tire size. Which gives you an additional .5" of clearance.

That's right.  One half inch.

Hmmm.

High lift 1983 Dodge crewcab on a used car lot. Didn't this lift go a bit too far?  But It looks like it does have good clearance.  It also has a full sized crew cab, something that isn't the case with the 07 for some odd reason. The box here appears to be a short box, which isn't what I'd want.  The tires on this truck are likely 35" tires, maybe 40".

On the other hand, there are off road tires that will fit 17" rims that are 35" in width. And that would give me an extra 1.5".  That doesn't sound like a lot, but it may be.

40" tires are also made for 17" rims, but I'm not going there.

The father of all modern 4x4 trucks, the first generation of the Dodge WC truck from World War Two.  These had great clearance, but this 1/2 ton model was also too high and prone to roll overs.

I'm tempted to go with 35" tires, but that means the tread width is also wider, which I really don't want if it starts to impact performance.  I like narrower tires over wider.  I don't want to float on wet roads or mud.

And some people claim that if you put 35" on, you need to lift the truck or put on a leveling kit. Others claim that isn't so.

Second model of World War Two WC 4x4 truck. This 3/4 ton truck was about perfect.

What would also be the case is that it would impact the gear ratio by making it higher.  My gearing is the lowest possible but that would effectively make both 5th and 6th gears overdrives.  A person can adjust this, I think, by changing the ring and pinion gears in the axles, but I hadn't planned on really doing that.

And of course it might mean that I'd need to lift it as well, or a leveling kit that also lifted the rear.  Modern trucks are canted forward on purpose, for fuel efficiency purposes, and a leveling  kit does just that.  It lifts, probably about 2" in this case, which would be fine, but that also means if you have a trailer on the rear, it's going to have its nose in the air.

All of which leads me to believe that maybe no more than one tire size bigger, if that.

Which really won't achieve much.

The two Dodges.

_________________________________________________________________________________

*It's starting to get some rust over a wheel well.  It has a crack on the body of the box.  My brother in law, who is a diesel mechanic by training, warns me that sooner or later it'll need some major engine work, as old as it is.  And it needs a selection of odds and ends repairs to really get it back into ship shape if I'm keeping it, and that's money into an old truck.

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, released.


Laramie Wyoming. 1940 and Now.



More Broken: Was Lex Anteinternet: Lex Anteinternet: It's broken. Or at least its fr...


Blog Mirror: Wyoming Then and Now. Old Main, 1940/2019


wyomingthenandnow's profile picture

  • Image may contain: people standing, shoes and outdoor
  • Image may contain: outdoor




The 2020 Election, Part 3



Saturday, October 26, 2019

Turkish Sanctions Lifted

I hadn't even realized sanctions had been imposed when they came off, but President Trump lifted sanctions on Turkey that followed its invasion of northern Syria.

The invasion followed the American abandonment of the Syrian Kurds, lead by the YPK, which we've been following.  Following that, the  Turks have aligned with the Russians which are now jointly patrolling an occupied zone of northern Syria, also occupied by Syrian Islamist militias which have been executing Kurdish prisoners and releasing some ISIL affiliated ones. 

The sanctions, a type of strike back that rarely works, were supposed to address Turkish excesses in Syria and were proclaimed now unnecessary in light of a supposed cease fire worked out by the United States.  It's hard to see what deal we actually reached as the Turks achieved their goal and moved oddly closer to Russia in the mix, something they're likely to regret.  Overall, the long term results are likely to be unhappy for everyone, including the United States which comes out of the entire affair looking simply awful.  It's worst of all for the Kurds and what little democratic forces there are in Syria.

October 26, 1919. A pagent

Marie Downey Werner rehearses the role of Victory in act to be preformed for the King and Queen of Belgium. Washington Times, October 26, 1919.

On this day in 1919, the Washington Times ran photos of a pageant being practiced for the visit of the King and Queen of Belgium.


Allegorical plays, particularly featuring women, were quite popular at the time.





On monarchy, on this day in 1919, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and his twin sister Ashraf were born in Persia.  He'd become the final Shah of Iran.


His story is fairly complicated, and of course his downfall lead to epic consequences.

His father was Reza Khan Pahlavi and his mother was his second wife, Tad ol-Molouk.  Khan became the first Shah of the Pahlavi Dynasty, if you can consider it that, given its short duration.  His father had been a general in the Persian Cossack Brigade that served Imperial Russia up until 1920, and the British for a time thereafter.  He was of mixed Iranian and Georgian ancestry, and his mother was from a Muslim immigrant to Persia from Georgia.  They were not royals, but that changed when his father, a military strong man who was scene as the potential savior of Persia from Bolshevism, was elevated to that role following a 1925 coup. 

The son grew up in the shadow of a domineering father who was an admirer of Hitler and who believed that showing affection to male sons encouraged homosexuality.  His mother doted on him but was highly superstitious.  He rose to power himself when his father fell after a joint Soviet British invasion in 1941 which allowed a route to be opened up through the country for supplies.  The Iranian military offered no effective resistance and the embarrassment lead to the change in governments.

The new Shaw would rule until 1979 when he'd be put to flight due to the Islamist revolution which converted the country into an "Islamic Republic", which it remains today.  His monarchy was quixotic, and was in the unenviable role of attempting to be a liberalizing reformer while ruling as a monarch.  This lead to animosity with conservative Shiia clerics which ultimately lead to his downfall.

Thursday, October 24, 2019

Blog Mirror: Wyoming Then and Now. Old Main, 1940/2019

wyomingthenandnow's profile picture
  • Image may contain: people standing, shoes and outdoor
  • Image may contain: outdoor

More Broken: Was Lex Anteinternet: Lex Anteinternet: It's broken. Or at least its fr...

Stranded semi tractors on the Happy Jack Road outside of Cheyenne.  Yes, my window is cracked.
Lex Anteinternet: Lex Anteinternet: It's broken. Or at least its fr...: A man, woman, their horse, and dog. Tanana, Alaska, prior to World War One. I published this item last week: Lex Anteinternet: It&#39...
So, last weekend the kids and I went deer hunting.

Deer season this year is very short for some reason, I don't know why, but it is. Or maybe it seemed that way as I had no opportunity to take a day off from work to go, and the kids of course had no opportunity to take a day off from university.  So I actually missed the better part of it before I even went out.

We didn't draw into limited area tags, so our options were limited to local general areas.  There's been some changes in them recently and the area that we generally go to, when we go to a general area, is antlered deer, three points or better, now.

I'm not a game biologist and I'm not a head hunter either, so I don't quite get the "antlered deer only" thing.  I probably should study up on it, but I don't get it.  Particularly in the area where I went which has been infested with Chronic Wasting Disease in recent years, and I'd think they'd want to cut the numbers of all deer down a bit. But, as noted, I'm not a game biologist so I can't say the reasoning isn't solid.

Anyhow, we headed out on Saturday and saw a lot of deer, and hiked a lot of ground, but we didn't see any bucks at all until the afternoon.  About that time, finally arriving after hours as the spot that I intended to check in the first place, we saw a single deer.

And quite a deer he was.  He looked like the deer on a bottle of Jägermeister, a German liqueur I've never tasted, in part because it's one of those odd liquors that in the United States is associated with stupid behavior.  But the label is impressive.

The label features a deer with a large rack with a cross in between its antlers.  The image recalls St. Hubert (which I knew) and St. Eustace, both of whom had profound religious conversions after encountering deer while hunting which had the image of the cross blazing between their antlers.

St. Hubert encounters the deer.

Or at least according to Wikipedia the image on the bottle honors St. Hubert and St. Eustace.  I suspect its only meant to recall St. Hubert, who would have been better known to Europeans in the 1930s when the liquer was first created.  St. Eustace is remembered more in the Eastern church and was a Roman general who converted after such an experience while hunting and who was ultimately martyred in 118.  

St. Hubert lived more recently, post Roman Empire, having been born in 656 and living until 727.  He was born in what is now southern France into a noble family, but was sent north to Paris at an early age.  Due to political turmoil, he was one of many who ended up it Metz as sort of a noble refugee and we need to keep in mind that France, as a solid political entity, didn't exist at the time. Anyhow, he married one Floribanne, daughter of Dagobert, Count of Leuven, and the couple had a son, Floribert, later the Bishop of Liege.  In this fluid political time, therefore, fate had taken Huber from Toulouse to Liège in an onward northern migration.

Hubert was not a religious man and that condition was amplified when his wife died giving birth to Floribert, a not uncommon fate for women at the time.  After that, Hubert took entirely to hunting in the Ardennes, living a solitary hunting life.  On a Good Friday, however when the faithful were gathering in Church in honor of that day (which is not a Holy Day of Obligation) he encountered a great stag and the it turned on him, cross between its horns, and spoke, saying:
Hubert, unless thou turn to the Lord, and lead a holy life, you shall quickly go down into hell.
It's hard to ignore a thing like that, to say the least, and Hubert dismounted from his horse and immediately, according to tradition, replied; "Lord, what would You have me do?", to which the reply came "Go and seek Lambert, and he will instruct you."  Hubert entered the priesthood and rose to the rank of Bishop of Liege, which he occupied until his death, at which point his priest son took over that position.  Both are saints.

According to the legend of his encounter, the deer also lectured St. Hubert on having higher regard for animals and engaging in human hunting practices, including taking old stags beyond their prime breeding years, and also to take sick or injured animals even if it meant passing up on a shot at atrophy.  There's more to it, but St. Hubert is accordingly still  held in high regard in Germany, Austria and France among hunters and ethical hunting principals taught in European hunting societies are attributed to him.

Anyhow, the deer was like that one depicted, but lacked of course the cross.  That would have been life altering to say the least, but at least day altering was the fact that I rose my rifle up, shot, and missed.

Now, I'm a good shot and this totally perplexed me, as did missing a second shot from a greater distance.  After all of this, I shot at a couple of rocks at varying distances to see if something had happened to my rifle's zero.  Nope, it was right on.

I have no idea what happened.  Suffice it to say it was frustrating.

We stayed out but never saw another buck deer.  Only does.

On the way in, when we hit the junction with 287, it was like a parade.  Vehicles coming home in the dark from UW's Homecoming Game.  Something I've never seen, not even when I lived in Laramie.

It was also getting a lot colder and it was clearly going to snow.

It wasn't in the morning, however, and therefore the plan to get up and attend the 8:00 a.m. Mass across town seemed a solid one.  "Across town" was now the required option as the Priest at our parish changed the Mass time at the downtown church from 8:00 to 9:00, also moving the 11:00 to 11:30. This is part of a demographic change I understand, but it also means that those of us long habituated to 8:00 (at one time it was 7:30) now have to find another parish.

On the way out of the church after Mass, it was snowing.  And on the road home, it was snowing heavily.  By the time I checked the WYDOT site, the roads in and out of Laramie had closed. They'd closed in fact pretty early.

This proved to be particularly problematic for my daughter who had academic matters at UW she could not miss.  By noon it appeared it was not going to change and I decided to head back out hunting (I don't mind hunting in bad weather), but Long Suffering Spouse informed me that "you better wait until you see what they're going to do", which amounted to an instruction not to leave in anticipation of having to do something.

Now, Long Suffering Spouse has a unique manner of speech in which, when she wants somebody to do something, or somebody to correct something they are doing, rather than address the person directly, she comments on "People".  For instance, rather than say "Please take out the garbage" or simply command "Take out the garbage", she'll say "People need to take out the garbage".  This is something she comes by naturally as a learned behavior and its not going to be possible to break it, but it can be baffling if you are in a group. When she directs the comment to "people", there's only one of the people who it's being addressed to and she knows who it is.  That's not so obvious to other people.

About 2:30 she came into a room where I was reading and somewhat dozing and announced that "If people need to really get to Laramie they may need to go to Cheyenne and up through Ft. Collins".  As a little earlier in the day the possibility if me driving my daughter to Laramie if the roads opened up was discussed, while allowing my son to wait until the next day, and as I was the only one in the room, it was pretty clear to me that I was the "people" and this meant, "You need to drive her to Laramie and should plan on going through Ft. Collins".  She then went out to shovel snow.

I addressed my daughter on the topic and she was wanting to go for the aforementioned reasons so she packed right up, we loaded up in the old Dodge diesel truck and turned it on.  Long Suffering Spouse then came to the driver's window and asked "what are you doing?"  I informed her we were leaving, just as she'd instructed, and she disclaimed having done that.  I dismissed it and we headed off.

That may seem odd, but part of the "People" line of speech can be accompanied, if there's a decision to be made, by a long deliberative process.  This gets into our Ninth Law of Behavior, but Long Suffering Spouse really likes to debate options prior to making a decision, and if at all possible, to have somebody else make them.  It's not uncommon for options to be presented, for me to make a decision, and then still find options being presented well after the decision has been made.

This is a process that makes people who have that inclination comfortable and its hardly unique to her.  I've had at least one employee who was so extreme on it that absolutely nothing the employee did wasn't subject to a request for input, no matter how minor it was.  That's not the case here, it's just her decision making style.

That style, however, doesn't lend itself to making decision that need to be made immediately and I simply dismissed her question as being the typical one we'd have, in which a decision has been made and now we're getting extra options. We even do this on the way to dinner when we eat out.  Options are presented, I'm asked to make the decision, I do, and then on the way there, additional options are added.  Given as it was 3:00 p.m. and I was off for a long ride down and back, I left before additional options could be added, as there did not appear to be any.

The roads down to Cheyenne weren't great, but they weren't horrible either.  By the time we got to Cheyenne the Happy Jack Road was open to local traffic only, but by my reasoning Laramie is local.  So we turned off to take it.

But not before a Highway Patrolman stopped me on I80 on the portion of the road where it was closing.  He whipped around with flashing lights so I pulled over.  He then announced on his bull horn that I couldn't stop on the side of the road.

I was only stopped on the side of the road as he'd pulled me over.  He never even got out of his patrol car.

Anyhow, we found Happy Jack Road, which I haven't been on for more than thirty years, and started up it.  The road was in excellent shape. . . until the top.



The ten or fifteen miles on the summit were horrific and were among the worst roads I'd ever been on.  But we made it to Laramie without incident after a white knuckler up on top.

By the time I made it to Laramie, 287 and 487 were open, so I headed home the normal way.  Roads weren't awful, even if stretches weren't great, and I made it home about 10:00 p.m., much earlier than I expected, but late for me.

It turned out I'd totally misinterpreted Long Suffering Spouse's "People" instruction and in fact she had only brought the topic up as an interesting topic of discussion with no intention whatsoever to send anyone off on such a trip.  Indeed, it turned out she was horrified the entire time and didn't think anyone should have hit the road at all.

I'd been up since about 3:00 a.m. and so when we got home, about dark, I was pretty tired.  That evening, however, my son suddenly recalled that he'd meant to tell me that there'd been a little water on the floor down at my mother's old house.  He attributed it to condensation from the water heater as the thermostat had been set low and it had turned cold.  I feared something else.


I was right.  The bottom of the gas water heater had rusted through.  This was confirmed the second I saw the water heater, which was at about 11:00 p.m.

In my son's defense, he hadn't experienced this before and he's been fortunate to grow up in a house with very few plumbing problems.  Thinking back it seems to me that our home when I was a kid was constantly afflicted with plumbing problems.  I suspect hat this is one of those areas in which the march of technology has made things much more reliable, as it has with automobiles.  When I was a kid, the man of the house working on plumbing at least once a year was pretty normal, and I'd experienced prior water heater failures.  Now, this is pretty rare.

It took us about two hours to get the tank drained and the water turned off.  The plumbers came the next day and installed a new one.

Going to bed at 1:00 a.m. doesn't mean I get to sleep in the next day and so it was off to work at the normal time. Before that, however, I got a text that our ceiling was leaking at work.



And indeed it was.


Very recently the air conditioning system was worked on and it was immediately and ocrrectly suspected that this had something to do with the leak.  The leak was quickly addressed once somebody came to work on it, but that wasn't until about 3:00 p.m.


So during the day, it became leakier.


It's now fixed.

On the way out of the building in the evening, which was on my way to an evening meeting I had scheduled, the young Asian woman who is always very friendly asked what the floor sheet on the elevator was for.  She's among the very best dressed people in the building and was wearing either a white fur or faux fur.  "Ceiling leak" I replied.  "Old building", she replied back in her very thick accent (I've never been really sure where she's actually from, I'd like to ask, but I don't want to appear rude in doing so).

Well maybe.  But sort of just one of those things, recently.

Laramie Wyoming. 1940 and Now.

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, released.

The iconic Western movie, of course.

It's a movie that I haven't reviewed yet (I guess this will have to suffice for the review), in spite of an effort here to catch movies of interest that are "period pieces", if you will, which all non fantasy movies set in the past are.

The 1969 movie is one of the best loved and best remembered western movies.  It took a much different tone in regard to Western criminals than the other major Western of the same year, The Wild BunchI frankly prefer The Wild Bunch, which as I earlier noted is a guilty pleasure of mine, but I love this film as well.

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid is a romanticized and fictionalized version of the story of the two Wyoming centered Western criminals who ranged over the entire state and into the neighboring ones.  In the film, which is set in the very early 1900s before they fled to Boliva, and which follows them into Bolivia, the two, portrayed by film giants Paul Newman (Butch) and Robert Redford (Cassidy), come across as lovable rogues, and barely rogues at that.  The film had a major impact at the box office and came in an era in which the frequently predicted "end of the Western movies" had already come.

The Hole In The Wall Gang, lead by (Robert LeRoy Parker) Butch Cassidy, far right, and Harry Lonabaugh (the Sundance Kid). This photograph was a stupid move and lead to their downfall.

So how accurate is it?

Well, pretty mixed. 

Even the Pinkerton Detective Agency allows that they are the two romanticized Western criminals, and there are quite a few romanticized Western criminals, are closest to their public image. They were intelligent men and got away with their depredations in part as there were locals who liked them well enough not to cooperate with authorities, although that was also true of much less likable Western criminals.  And the vast majority of characters in the film represent real figures who filled the roles that they are portrayed as having in the film.  So in that sense, its surprisingly accurate.

Where it really fails, of course, is in glossing over the fact that they were in fact violent criminals.  And as outlaws their history is both violent and odd for the era.  The Wild Bunch, the criminal gang with which they are most associated, was extremely loosely created, and people came and went, rather than there being just one single group of outlaws.  The Wild Bunch itself generally took refuge, when it needed to, in Johnson County's Hole in the Wall region (their cabin exists to this day) and perhaps because of this or because of several of them being associated with the Bassett sisters, the daughters of a local small rancher, their activities oddly crossed back and forth between pure criminality and association with the small rancher side of the conflict that lead to the Johnson County War.  This latter fact, once again, may have contributed to their image as lovable criminals, even though they themselves were not in the category of individuals like Nate Champion who were actual small cattlemen who were branded as criminals by larger cattle interest. The gang was, rather, made up of actual criminals.

So the depiction of them simply attacking the evil (in the film) Union Pacific is off the mark. They were thieves.  Just less despicable thieves than most.

They did go to Bolivia and their lives did end there, according to the best evidence.  The film accurately portrays their demise coming in the South American country even if it grossly exaggerates that end, persistent rumors of at least Butch's survival aside.

Material detail wise the film is so so.  This late 1960s movie came at a time at which a high degree in material details, a bar set by Lonesome Dove, hadn't yet arrived, so the appearance of things reflects the movie styles of the late 1960s more than the actual appearance of things in the early 1900s.  Arms, however, are correct as in this movie making era the tendency to try to stand out by showing unique items in use hadn't arrived.

All things being considered, it is a great Western and well worth seeing.  It belied the belief that the era of Westerns was over, and in some ways it recalls earlier sweet treatment of Western criminals who were supposed to be just wild boys at heart.  Nobody gets killed in the film until Butch and Sundance do at the bitter end, which contributes to that.  In reality, The Wild Bunch is likely a more realistic portray of Western criminals, but this is a great film.

A portrait


Sarah Gracie King Iselin, and son, October 24, 1919.

She was married to banker Andrian Selin, Jr., and was his second wife, the first having past away.  He'd outlive her as well, as she'd pass away in 1931.


Wednesday, October 23, 2019

The Clearance Dilemma

The 2007 Dodge in the high country.

I have a 2007 Dodge 3500 4x4.  It's the crewcab with a long box.

It's a great truck and I have no intention of trading it away any time soon, even though my wife feels that I should be trading it in, and even though there are a few valid reasons to do so.*  Indeed, I have no intention whatsoever of getting any new vehicles in the future whatsoever.

It's been a great truck.  It's had a few problems over the years, as they all do, but by and large, as a vehicle with 180,000 miles now on it, it's been remarkably trouble free.  As I'll post here shortly in another thread, it's also been a very safe one.  It preforms very well, in that context, on highway ice and snow, and I've had it on some dicey roads to say the least.  There are things that it doesn't compare favorably to in regard to newer trucks, but there are things it compares more favorably with, in my view.  For one thing, it has a standard transmission, something which is now a thing of the past with American full sized trucks. Automatics, the favorite of urban dwellers, have taken over.

But there's one thing.

As a very long, and stock, vehicle, it doesn't have the kind of clearance that I'd like.

Another 07 in a parking lot, photographed from the cab of my 07.  This one has about the perfect tire size in my view, and is leveled (not lifted) about 2".  It looks great and has better clearance than mine.  Of course, he isn't towing any stock trailers either.  I wish I'd run up and taken a photo of the tire size.

I've whacked rocks with the front differential and slightly dented it.  And I've high centered it on snow nearly annually.

I'm tempted to try to boost the clearance, and that would mean larger tires.

It came equipped with 265/70R17s, and I have an off road (that will also do highway) example of that on now.  That tire is 31.5" in width.  It will, as is, go up one tire size. Which gives you an additional .5" of clearance.

That's right.  One half inch.

Hmmm.

High lift 1983 Dodge crewcab on a used car lot. Didn't this lift go a bit too far?  But It looks like it does have good clearance.  It also has a full sized crew cab, something that isn't the case with the 07 for some odd reason. The box here appears to be a short box, which isn't what I'd want.  The tires on this truck are likely 35" tires, maybe 40".

On the other hand, there are off road tires that will fit 17" rims that are 35" in width. And that would give me an extra 1.5".  That doesn't sound like a lot, but it may be.

40" tires are also made for 17" rims, but I'm not going there.

The father of all modern 4x4 trucks, the first generation of the Dodge WC truck from World War Two.  These had great clearance, but this 1/2 ton model was also too high and prone to roll overs.

I'm tempted to go with 35" tires, but that means the tread width is also wider, which I really don't want if it starts to impact performance.  I like narrower tires over wider.  I don't want to float on wet roads or mud.

And some people claim that if you put 35" on, you need to lift the truck or put on a leveling kit. Others claim that isn't so.

Second model of World War Two WC 4x4 truck. This 3/4 ton truck was about perfect.

What would also be the case is that it would impact the gear ratio by making it higher.  My gearing is the lowest possible but that would effectively make both 5th and 6th gears overdrives.  A person can adjust this, I think, by changing the ring and pinion gears in the axles, but I hadn't planned on really doing that.

And of course it might mean that I'd need to lift it as well, or a leveling kit that also lifted the rear.  Modern trucks are canted forward on purpose, for fuel efficiency purposes, and a leveling  kit does just that.  It lifts, probably about 2" in this case, which would be fine, but that also means if you have a trailer on the rear, it's going to have its nose in the air.

All of which leads me to believe that maybe no more than one tire size bigger, if that.

Which really won't achieve much.

The two Dodges.

_________________________________________________________________________________

*It's starting to get some rust over a wheel well.  It has a crack on the body of the box.  My brother in law, who is a diesel mechanic by training, warns me that sooner or later it'll need some major engine work, as old as it is.  And it needs a selection of odds and ends repairs to really get it back into ship shape if I'm keeping it, and that's money into an old truck.

A Complete And Total Defeat

Turkey, a nation with a good, but 1970s vintage (maybe 80s vintage) military was able to enter northern Syria as we left, abandoning the Kurds to their fate.  Hence they took what amounts to either a Turkish/Kurdish/Syrian DMZ or what amounts to an expansion of their border south into Syrian Kurdistan thereby retaking a slice of land they last held in 1918.

And now they, the Syrian government, and Russia have entered into an agreement whereby the Russians will patrol the border with Turkey and will "clear" a border region 18 miles deep, with some exceptions, into Syrian Kurdistan.

The implications of this are vast.  It seems to signal the ongoing evolution of Turkey, under its current prime minister, into a rogue state that's increasingly aligned with enemies of the West.  It elevates Russia above its natural status into an increasingly important regional power broker.  And it's the open doorway for Damascus to regain the entire northern Syrian region, given that Syria and Russia are strange bedfellow allies.

As I've repeatedly noted here, I never thought the United States entering the Syrian civil war was a good idea in the first place, and that fact make me seem hypocritical here.  Had I had my way, the natural results of it would have been that Damascus would have won the civil war and be occupying the country all the way to its frontiers right now.  So doesn't this just do what my "If I were President" position would have done?

Not really.

For one thing, this day would have arrived much earlier and with much less bloodshed.  It wouldn't have elevated Syrian Kurdistan into a putative state, as has occurred, with which we allied, and then abandoned.  That latter fact would likely have meant that the incentive for increased YPK violence against Turkey would not have increased, as the Turkish action seems likely to do.  And while Russia would have been involved, as Syria's only ally, the victory wouldn't have elevated Russia's position in the region while decreasing our own, which has now very much occurred.

So the disaster enters a new stage, and not one pleasant to contemplate.  Moscow isn't going to put Russian troops into harms way for charitable purposes and there will be a price to pay for everyone, including Turkey.

All because we were short sighted when we entered, and even more short sighted when we left.

Librarian, Kentucky 1936.