Sunday, March 17, 2019

Radharc Maidin Dé Domhnaigh: Lá Féile Naomh Pádraig

St. Patrick's Day, the Feast of St. Patrick, falls on a Sunday this year.

This seems particularly fitting this year.  A focus on what's real over the superficial.

Wednesday, August 15, 2012


St. Patrick's Catholic Church, Sidney Nebraska



This is St. Patrick's Catholic Church in Sidney, Nebraska.  It's a striking church that was built in 1913, although I wonder if part of the structure may have been added on to much more recently.  If so, the architects did an amazing job of keeping later construction consistent with the original design of the church.

Friday, April 22, 2011

Saturday, February 19, 2011


St. Patrick's Catholic Church, Casper Wyoming






St. Patrick's Catholic Church in Casper Wyoming was completed in 1962. The church came about due to the expansion of Casper in the 1950s, and this church is the newest of the three Roman Catholic churches in Casper. Unlike Our Lady of Fatiima, which represented an expansion to the west side of Casper, this church is located in east Casper.

Plans for the church commenced in 1955. Like Our Lady of Fatima, a school was constructed on the site but was never used as a regular grade school. The church is also the largest of the three Catholic churches in Casper, having a very large interior.

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Eastern Nebraska is Flooding

This past weeks mid latitude cyclone dumped epic amounts of snow over Nebraska, Wyoming and Colorado and now its melting.

Dams are breaking, and flooding is going on all over Eastern Nebraska.

Having not watched television at all this weekend, I don't know if this is getting the attention it deserves.  And it deserves a lot.

Best Posts of the Week of March 10, 2019

The best post of the week of March 10, 2019.

And so we have the biannual absurd resetting of the clocks once again. . .


Pushing Pause on the Boeing 737 Panic.


737 Max Grounded and Technology as "Too Complicated".


The Snow Storm


The Aerodrome: Lack of Training. The 737 Max story continues


The 2020 Election, Part 1


The contribution of television to evil


You know things have been odd when the assassination of a Gambino crime boss. . .

almost doesn't seem like news.

Mmm. . . maybe it is't that much in the way of news really.

The contribution of television to evil

The late Malcolm Browne in 1964.

Starting about three years ago I started putting up a lot of newspapers from a century prior right at the point of their publication centennial.  It's been illuminating as I hadn't appreciated, prior to that time, that the news services already existed and the better newspapers ran major news stories from across the country, and indeed across the globe, often within 24 hours of their occurring or even on the day that they occurred.  So people were informed of what was going on pretty quickly.  This is all the more the case as people really read the paper back then, as opposed to now when newspapers have declining readership.

But there is something really different about printed news.  It has a sense of remoteness about it.  Just last week, for example, the papers of a century ago were running a front page story about tornado deaths in Arkansas that, freakishly, occurred on the exact centennial of the same thing happening in 2019.  The difference is, however, that even over the span of a century, it's hard not to have the sense that the deaths in Arkansas were terrible, but they were not immediate to the lives of those who read the story elsewhere.

Television news alters this.  As we are a visual species, we react to images as if they are immediate.  This is why film has always been so impact.  Triumph of the Will wouldn't have matter a whit if it was a radio show.  It did as a movie.  Images have a way of impacting us the way other things do not. And part of that influences is that images exaggerate the importance of remote events.

Because of this, remote natural events have, in recent years, taken on a sense of political importance even though there's absolutely nothing anyone can really do about them.  President Bush was criticized vehemently over Hurricane Katrina, as if he could have done anything about it. Since that event, Presidents have been required to go to the scene of such disasters so that they can be filmed worrying about them, even though logic tells us that they'd be better off staying in the oval office where the news is likely a bit more clear.  Bush didn't make that mistake with the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack as he traveled to "Ground Zero". But why?  Franklin Roosevelt didn't travel to Pearl Harbor to look at the disaster there.  It's all just for the camera.

That's one thing, but an added aspect of it is that even though we are now in the most peaceful episode of all of human history, television has promoted violence in more ways than one. So has film for that matter.

One way that this has occurred is that television and film have celebrated and promoted every type of vile behavior including violence.  Violence and sexual depravity that at one time would have never appeared in film is routine in it now.  Entire major and still celebrated movies about World War Two were filmed that didn't devolve into gore and didn't feature a nearly mandatory act of sexual depravity prior to the 1970s, witness The Longest Day or Tora! Tora! Tora!  In contrast watch Fury or Pearl Harbor now.

Beyond that, however, televised news footage, now available twenty-four hours a day on everyone's computer, has contributed to acts by lone actors against masses of people in all sorts of ways.  Indeed, we know now that the horrific events in Christchurch New Zealand were inspired by that.

Already, because of the nature of images, the reactions have been out of sync with reality.  New Zealand's prime minister has indicated that "something" will be done about her country's lax gun control provisions when in fact the attack was stopped at one of the mosques where it occurred because a worshiper was armed and the attacker abandoned the attack there.  And based on what we now know of the immigrant attacker who wanted to attack immigrants (apparently he didn't conceive of himself as an immigrant as he was white and not a Muslim, but he was) he would have struck out no matter where he was.

But more than that, if this news was regarded as remote, it would be remote, as horrible as that may sound. This sort of thing has spread due to the camera.

In 1963 journalist Malcolm Browne was informed to be at a certain location in Saigon where something was supposed to occur.  Browne was one of the few people who heeded the call to be there.  When there, he watched as a Buddhist monk, Thich Quang Duc, sat down in an intersection and another monk calmly poured ten gallons of gasoline over him.  Doing that takes some time.  The seated monk then set himself on fire.

Browne admitted that he could have intervened and stopped it and he admitted that he had that urge. But he stated that he couldn't as he was as journalist.  Instead, he took photographs of Thich Quang Duc burning.

Browne was a chemist before he was as journalist.  His instincts were right but his actions were wrong.  If he later was bothered by what he'd not done, he should have been.  He was complicit in the death of a human being.

Still more bills become law. . . but not necessarily with the Governor's signature. The Private School Bill

Counties lost their ability to control zoning regulations as they pertain to private schools last week when Governor Gordon, making what was probably the correct decision from a political perspective, if not necessarily from a philosophical one, chose to let the bill that achieved that pass into law without his signature.

The bill came about when a school sponsored by the Freiss family ran afoul of Teton County zoning. The school is apparently housed on the grounds, or in, a Teton County church and is set to loose its lease.  It set about to build its own structure on its own grounds but Teton County did not approve its petition for an exception to zoning requirements.  A summary of the bill is below:

ORIGINAL SENATE ENGROSSED
FILE NOSF0049

ENROLLED ACT NO. 67, SENATE

SIXTY-FIFTH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WYOMING
2019 GENERAL SESSION




AN ACT relating to counties; exempting private schools from county zoning authority as specified; and providing for an effective date.

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:

Section 1.  W.S. 185201 is amended to read:

185201.  Authority vested in board of county commissioners; inapplicability of chapter to incorporated cities and towns; mineral resources; private schools.

(a)  To promote the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the county, each board of county commissioners may regulate and restrict the location and use of buildings and structures and the use, condition of use or occupancy of lands for residence, recreation, agriculture, industry, commerce, public use and other purposes in the unincorporated area of the county. However, nothing in W.S. 185201 through 185208 shall be construed to contravene any zoning authority of any incorporated city or town. and No zoning resolution or plan shall prevent any use or occupancy reasonably necessary to the extraction or production of the mineral resources in or under any lands subject thereto. No zoning resolution or plan shall regulate and restrict the location and use of buildings and structures and the use, condition of use or occupancy of lands for the use of a private school as defined in W.S. 214101(a)(iii) in any manner different from a public school, provided that the private school:

(i)  Is certified by the professional engineer or architect of record for the private school as being substantially similar to school facility commission guidelines for education buildings and siting and is designed to be constructed with appropriate materials, means and methods;

(ii)  Has capacity for fifty (50) students or more; and

(iii)  Is owned and operated by a not for profit entity.

Section 2.  This act is effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.

It's difficult not to see this bill in a highly political, and even cynical, way.  Wyoming is big on local control, and that's the official governmental philosophy of the State.  Here, however, the legislature yanked local control from a county in favor of basically no control, or what control there will be being vested in the School Facilities Commission.  A person could see that as a victory for private schools, which is how it likely will be sold, but sooner or later the Federal Government under some future Administration will exercise the same sort of control and we'll be howling.  There's no way to be simultaneously for and against local control.

In the background of this, moreover, its hard not to see this as patronage for the Freiss family of a political sort.  Foster Freiss' backers, including himself, were smarting after his loss and there bill about registration dates for primaries was really caused by the feeling that floods of Wyoming Democrats in a state that hardly has any Democrats crossed over prior to the polls to vote for Freiss.  Added to that has been the long conversion of Teton County from a dirt poor ranching, hunting and skiing Wyoming town to a playground for the mostly Democratic wealthy jet set and the crowed they've attracted, combined with Granolas and Neo-Granolas who are also Democratic.  The Freiss school, which is fundamentally a highly conservative Protestant institution complete with English public school style attire, stands against that.  By funding a special bill for it, the backers could either see themselves as protecting unpopular institutions against local bias or inserting a little of their views back into the county.

Governor Gordon was likely tempted to veto it, but if he had that would have placed him square against the Freiss partisans who preferred Foster Freiss over Governor Gordon.  It was probably wise not to politicize this any more than it already was, so in that context, letting it go was probably the smart thing to do politically for the new Governor.

March 16, 1919. Returns and the the Sunday movies.






C. S. Lewis on Courage

Courage is not simply one of the virtues but the form of every virtue at the testing point, which means at the point of highest reality.

C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters.

Friday, March 15, 2019

The Aerodrome: Lack of Training. The 737 Max story continues

The Aerodrome: Lack of Training. The 737 Max story continues: I've published a couple of items on the 737 Max, the most recent one being here: The Aerodrome: 737 Max Grounded and Technology as &qu...

Friday Farming: Daylight Saving Time was not created for farmers

While I'm in a grumpy mood. . .

There's a myth out there that Daylight Saving Time was created for farmers. 

It wasn't.

Farmers and ranchers base their day on how much work there is to do and what that work entails. That's one of the charming things about their occupations.  It's actually tied to nature and natural cycles. They don't punch a time clock.

They also don't get overtime and it doesn't matter to any governmental regulatory agency how many hours they put in during a day, or how few.

Daylight Saving Time was foisted upon the nation during World War One to conserve fuel during the war, which was in short supply.  How exactly this was supposed to occur frankly isn't clear, but a lot of the pure unadulterated muddled thinking about Daylight Saving Time makes most of its supposed advantages unclear.

The Government boosted the idea by promoting the concept that everyone would have an extra hour to  go home and work on their war gardens. Because a lot of people really want to be working in the daylight on their gardens at 10:00 p.m. rather than 9:00 p.m.

Yeah. . . right.

In more recent years, when it was regularized in the 1960s, it was common to suggest such things as this allowed everyone to get out on the golf course.

Whatever.

Farmers had nothing to do with it.

The Snow Storm

It's a popular and classic thing for adults, at a certain point, to look back on the weather of their youth and declare it to be worse than the weather today.  Be that as it may, I'm absolutely certain that when I was growing up in the 1960s and 1970s we had a lot more really bad winter weather.  Even into the 1980s this was true.

Indeed folks who track climate often note that the 1970s was a cold decade and there was some discussion in the 60s and 70s about what to do, if anything, about a cooling climate.  At one point there was even a suggestion, in the 1960s, that perhaps the Air Force could be used to bast shipping passages in the event of increased polar ice through the use of atomic bombs, a rather frightening proposition to say the least.  In the early to mid 1980s, when I lived in Laramie the first time, the winters were so cold that there were weeks that didn't rise above 0F and once the snow set in, in the town, it simply remained there until the spring thaw, which was spiced by the sent of thawing dog crap that students had let built up in their yards all winter long.

So I have a fairly distinct recollection of earlier winters and perhaps that's why I found the recent reaction to the recent snow storm rather silly.

Now, I think the schools were right in shutting down in the regions of the state hit by the storms, and I don't blame them at all for that.  But individual reactions really caught me off guard.  A lot of people didn't go into work in some areas, although in the same areas, a lot of lifetime Wyomingites did.  I did, and I frankly didn't find the roads all that bad.  I was surprised when some people reacted by wondering if everyone would stay home when in fact everyone was already there.  Most locals were "no big deal". Indeed, I know of one employer who was likely to have taken the day off himself, being an import from somewhere else, who went to tell his employees to stay home only to find that he himself was the only one employed in that business who hadn't shown up on time.  He had to sheepishly go in.

Perhaps the most personally annoying, for a reason I'll note below, is the reaction of one of the person's in my neighborhood, however.

One of the really super nice people in my neighborhood whom I really like takes snow removal to an extreme.  I'll confess that I'm one of those people who don't come close to doing that, and as I have  busy schedule, I don't always get around to snow removal even when I should.  I knew the night prior to the big snow day that this would mean a big snow removal effort on his part. 

Well, sure enough, and when I went to work he stopped to talk to me and informed me that he was going to call the city to have the street plowed.

I don't really know if the city will plow a street simply because a resident requests it.  I really doubt it.  I hope they don't.  Something that average people probably don't appreciate much is that snow plowing efforts by cities are extremely expensive and a single storm can actually practically destroy a city's budget. 

Our city plows major through ways and that's all they need to do.  There's no reason whatsoever for a city to plow a residential street, save for the city's own purposes.  To make matters worse, our city plows to the center of the street which does keep cars from being plowed in but which also creates giant "windrows" which are a hazard in all sorts of ways. In residential streets, which aren't all that wide, it means that you really can't park in front of your house after they're created as there isn't room for cars to go buy after that.

Well, sure enough, when I got home the street had been plowed and there was a windrow with the width and elevation of the Himalayas in front of my house.  Sherpas had tried to make it over the top and had been frozen to death in their efforts.  Wild Yetis were roaming the windrows, and Indian and Pakistan were engaged in a fierce border fight over the windrow.

Okay, I exaggerate, but only a little.

That did mean that I could not park my Jeep in front of my house, thanks to the freaking windrow. 

Now I do have space. . . .barely, to park my Jeep in front of my travel trailer. . . when the weather is nice.  When I do that, I back into that space, carefully.  I tried to do that and found that the 1.5 feet of snow there meant I couldn't do it in one pass and had to go back and forth.  Finally, the Jeep slipped and the Jeep rack went into the bumper of my old Dodge D3500 parked there.  In pulling it forward, the rack was pretty badly damaged.

Great.

Now, I can't really blame the plowing on anyone.  I suspect that the city opened the street up in this fashion for its own purposes.  I really hope so.  But I'm really not happy about it.  I'll get over it, but now I have to debate on having a body shop repair my Jeep or having my brother in law weld up a cracked weld that developed after I bent my rack back into place.  He can do that, but he's busy, and it means driving out and taking away from his day to do that.  I doubt he has the time, and I know that I don't.

Wyoming has legendarily bad winter weather forever.  If you live here, and you want to drive, I figure you'll have a vehicle that anticipates that.  I was having no problem driving at all.  Nobody in my family, and they all drive, was. 

Sigh.

March 15, 1919: The busy post war Red Cross, a busy Poncho Villa and a League of Nations.

Female American Red Cross personnel in Paris, France, March 15, 1919.

French women employed by the American Red Cross repurposing bed linens in Paris, March 15, 1919.





American Red Cross hostel, Paris, with beds pulled from former hospitals.

 American Red Cross rest camp for American servicemen near the Eiffel Tower, Paris.



Americans getting a hot meal in Paris.



The war may have ended, but the duties of the Red Cross kept on.  Thousands of servicemen remained in Europe and their needs continued on, as did those of the thousands of refugees that were displaced as a result of the war.  For those folks, the Red Cross kept in operation.


Closer to home some were dreaming of their 1919 gardens.


And some were imaging adventure and probably romance.


J. C. Leyendecker was imagining fruit filled homecomings.


Villa was imagining a victory in Mexico and took some hostages towards that end..  The Mormons had a colony in Mexico at the time, and Villa apparently didn't take kindly to it, or at least saw it as an opportunity.

And alcohol interests were imagining a few more months in business to try to keep up their struggle to keep their product legal.


Woodrow Wilson was imagining the League of Nations as part of a treaty to end the war, which all the former warring parties were now working on.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn on Courage

A decline in courage may be the most striking feature that an outside observer notices in the West today… Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling and intellectual elites, causing an impression of a loss of courage by the entire society. There are many courageous individuals, but they have no determining influence on public life… Political and intellectual functionaries exhibit this depression, passivity, and perplexity in their actions and in their statements, and even more so in their self-serving rationales as to how realistic, reasonable, and intellectually and even morally justified it is to base state policies on weakness and cowardice… Must one point out that from ancient times a decline in courage has been considered the first symptom of the end?

 Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's 1978 Harvard Graduation address.

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Blog Mirror: The Aerodrome: 737 Max Grounded and Technology as "Too Complicated"

The Aerodrome: 737 Max Grounded and Technology as "Too Complicate...:




737 Max Grounded and Technology as "Too Complicated".

Yesterday I wrote about the 737 Max and the efforts to ground them globally in this post here:

Pushing Pause on the Boeing 737 Panic.


Two Boeing 737 Max's have crashed in the last month or so, the most recent in Ethiopia where it resulted in tragic loss of life.
After I wrote that, they were in fact grounded.

We still, of course, don't know what occurred.  There's anecdotal evidence, but only that, that there may be a problem with some of the automated features.  Or not.

It's important to acknowledge that we still don't know and there's a lot of things that could be occurring here, and one of them could be a couple of things that are being missed in the press or that people simply don't want to address.

I touched on one of those yesterday, politics.  Politics inform our views in all sorts of ways of course, and they can creep in here whether we mean for them to or not.  And by politics the politics of there being really only two companies on earth left that make large commercial aircraft, Boeing and Airbus.  The Europeans were quick to shut down the flights of the 737 Max to the extent that flights in the air had to turn around, which is flat out absurd.  A knowledgeable person later told me that a European aviation commenter claimed that part of the problem with the 737 Max is that Boeing is too close to the FAA, which is ironic in my view as I wonder if the hearts of the Europeans aren't a bit too close to Airbus.

Another issue was raised by President Donald Trump.



Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

Airplanes are becoming far too complex to fly. Pilots are no longer needed, but rather computer scientists from MIT. I see it all the time in many products. Always seeking to go one unnecessary step further, when often old and simpler is far better. Split second decisions are....
112K
8:00 AM - Mar 12, 2019
62.7K people are talking about this


Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

....needed, and the complexity creates danger. All of this for great cost yet very little gain. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want Albert Einstein to be my pilot. I want great flying professionals that are allowed to easily and quickly take control of a plane!
79K
8:12 AM - Mar 12, 2019
41.6K people are talking about this
Now, I'm frankly doubt that our President has the knowledge necessary to comment on aviation.  I'm not a pilot (I don't even like to be a passenger on an airplane, something ironic for a person who obviously likes airplanes themselves), but I'm pretty sure I know more about airplanes than Donald Trump and I'm not qualified to really go too far in my statements.  But this is becoming a common view and I've heard versions of this comment before, from other people.

Are they too complicated to fly?  Well, a person can debate that.  The real debate, however, is not if they are too complicated, really, but too automated. And that's a different thing entirely.

Modern aircarft are by and large the safest they've ever been, and part of that is due to technology. Technological advances have made modern commercial aircraft far more safe than any aircraft in prior eras, it's a simple fact.  Risks that passengers accepted in prior eras routinely would never be accepted now.

For example, the Fokker Tri Motor, which was a legendary early passenger airplane that's still widely regarded, was at first built with all wooden frame.  It was the snapping of the wooden wings of such a Fokker that resulted in the death of Knut Rockney and his fellow travelers in 1931.

Fokker F-10.  It had an all wooden frame.

Now, if you've flown, you've seen those wings flex. Would you feel safe in a wooden framed passenger plane?

I could go on and on about various older aircraft that were widely used that we'd be horrified to be in today, but the point is clear.  Airplanes are safer than ever, and technology is part of the reason for that.

But with that technology has come the inevitable computer override, to some degree of, pilot decisions.  A lot is now going on in all kids of aircraft due to computerization.  And computers fail or make errors.

The irony here is that the Airbus is more computer controlled than the 737 Max, I'm told.  Indeed, it flat out overrides pilot commands in some instances. The Boeing 737 Max was designed so that the pilot can control over the computer.  The Airbus is more like a modern AirTrain.  It feels free to basically tell the pilot, "no sir, I don't think so".

There could indeed be a problem with that, in all sorts of ways, at some point.  If there is, we should really pause as we're about to take that same path with automobiles.  Indeed, we already are.

And the drivers of cars are a lot less technologically adept as a rule than pilots are.  Indeed, as noted earlier American pilots are much more adept in every fashion than those of other nations, and perhaps that plays into this as well.

At any rate, no answers right now.  Hopefully no financial disaster for Boeing as well, which wouldn't serve the interest of the travelling public.