Thursday, August 4, 1914. Augusterlebnis

Germans, unaware that their nation would be bled white, and unalterably changed, celebrated the arrival of war.

All Germany's political parties supported the entry into the bloodbath.

And they were fighting for . . .what?

Germany replaced gold marks with paper marks for the duration of the war.

German Communists Karl Liebknecht, Rosa Luxemburg and Clara Zetkin co-founded with others the Spartacus League.

Germany invaded Belgium, once again bringing up its war guilt.  Belgium had done nothing to offend Germany.  It was invaded for tactical reasons as the Von Schlieffen Plan required it as part of a wide swinging German right flank invasion of France.

The German army shelled Kaisz, Poland to suppress a civil uprising there.

Imperial German Navy cruisers Goeben and Breslau shelled Algerian ports of Bône and Philippeville, defying orders to proceed straight to Constantinople.

The United Kingdom declared war on Germany, taking Canada, Australia and New Zealand into war with it, as legally, the UK declared war for its dominions at the time.  The Canadian government passed the War Measures Act, suspending some civil liberties.  

The British government took control of British railways.

Retired British Admiral Charles Cooper Penrose-Fitzgerald formed the Order of the White Feather to persuade women to offer white feathers to men not in uniform to shame them into enlisting.

The UK did not have a tradition of land army conscription at the time so it was anticipated that the war would be fought with volunteers.

The United States declared neutrality.

Andrew Carnegie continued with an international peace conference he had organized of religious leaders in Belgium.

The organization it created became the Church Peace Union and is now the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs.

Zayanes in Morocco launched a siege on Khenifra, Morocco, taking advantage of with French troops being withdrawn for service on the continent.

Last edition:

Monday, August 3, 1914. "The lamps are going out all over Europe; we shall not see them lit again in our lifetime."

Labels: 1910s, 1914, Belgium, boats and ships, China, France, German Empire, German Kriegsmarine, Germany, Ottoman Empire, Poland, Russia, Turkish Navy, United Kingdom, Von Schlieffen Plan, Winston Churchill, World War One

The Big Picture: The Failed Ziegler Expedition to the North Pole, 1905

Watch out for the Bull: Everybody Oughta Own a Jeep Sometime During Their Life

Watch out for the Bull: Everybody Oughta Own a Jeep Sometime During Their Life

Monday, August 3, 1914. "The lamps are going out all over Europe; we shall not see them lit again in our lifetime."

Germany declared war on Belgium and France following King Albert of Belgium refusing to allow Germany to violate Belgian neutrality.

Again, the more you look at it, war guilt?  Germany had it.  

British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey made his famous statement; "The lamps are going out all over Europe; we shall not see them lit again in our lifetime."

He'd be proven correct.

Earlier that day, he had urged the House of Commons to declare war on Germany if Belgian neutrality was violated.

German troops arrived in Kalisz, Poland, part of the Russian Empire.  Gun battles would break out later that day involving civilians.

The First Cadre Company of the Austro Hungarian Army was formed by Józef Piłsudski as part of his goal of achieving Polish independence.  The inevitable war within a war had begun.

Winston Churchill ordered the seizure of two Ottoman battleship under construction in the UK.

The German Navy captured the Russian steamer Ryazan in the Pacific and sent it to Tsingtao, their colony, for conversion into an auxiliary cruiser.

Last edition:

Sunday, August 2, 1914. First French and German casualties of the Great War.

Labels: 1910s, 1914, Catholic, Christianity, Economics, France, French Army, German Army, Germany, Luxembourg, Ottoman Empire, religion, Scandinavia, the spoken word, Von Schlieffen Plan, World War One

Tombstone

Tombstone 

1993

This movie is another cinematic portrayal of the "Gunfight at the OK Corral", but its nearly unique in the degree to which it focused on authenticity.  The makers of this movie so closely studied the clothing of the frontier southwest that when the movie came out it was criticized as inaccurate as it was so accurate.  Simply put, the period clothing in the region was very distinct and that was reflected in the film, to the shock of viewers who weren't used to seeing the distinctive look of the region.

The movie is other was a dramatized, but not bad, telling of a familiar tale.  Much more accurate than most of the films in this genera, it's really the material details that make this movie worth seeing. 

Movies In History: Saving Private Ryan

Saving Private Ryan

This film did to war movies what Lonesome Dove did to Westerns, it revolutionized them to such an extent that everything that came after had to meet its standard.

Set during Operation Overlord during World War Two, this film, featuring a fictionalized story based on an American Ranger unit, went to great lengths to get material details  right and mostly did.  Almost every item of equipment in the film is correct, something highly unusual for most war movies filmed before it.  This is so much the case that watching films made prior to it almost invariably bring out a bit of realization of that fact, even where they are really good, simply due to Saving Private Ryan's precision.  Details are so precise that the Rangers are shown, accurately, wearing some items of clothing that were unique to them alone.  The paratroopers are likewise correctly attired, as are regular U.S. infantrymen.

Still, as accurate as the film is, it amazingly isn't quite perfect in these regards.  The movie messes up significantly in material details in the case of the sniper character, who is shown having two scopes, which would not have been the case, and perhaps in that one them appears to be a large Unertl scope, which was an item used by the Marines but not the Army.  Scopes affixed to M1903A5 sniper rifles sued by the U.S. Army were generally Lyman Alaskans, which one of the scopes in the film does appear to be.  That particular scope featured a small diameter barrel and is correspondingly something that looks odd to the modern eye, which may explain the incorporation of a Unertl scope in the film, given their giant size.  Swapping out scopes, however, which is referenced in the film, would not have occurred.

Additionally the film makes a goof typical to films in that the sniper keeps shooting even when the five shot magazine capacity of his rifle is exhausted.

On material details the film also departs from being fully correct, as good of film as it is, in that two weapons in use in the Ranger squad unit are inappropriate for their use.   The senior NCO of the unit carriers an M1 Carbine, but M1 Carbines were not used by enlisted Rangers or infantrymen during World War Two, or at least weren't supposed to be.  That would be an appropriate weapon for the Tom Hanks character, who is a captain, but he carriers a Thompson submachinegun, which is also outside the TO&E.  Having said that, submachineguns did show up in sues that they were not supposed to official have, so that use may not be that unrealistic, which is likewise the case for one that is shown being used by an airborne officer.

Still, this movie is so well done that every war film since it has had to meet its standards or appear to be a failure, and even those filmed prior to it are hard to watch without being aware of how they fail to measure up.  The slight departures noted here are so slight that even mentioning them tends to overemphasize them.

In terms of historical details, the movie scores very high marks.  Operational details are generally correct, and only minor ones (such as a very early criticism of Montgomery before any U.S. officer would have been likely to have done that), show up.

An excellent film. And the one that basically sets the bar for films of this type.

Movies In History: Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?

Oh Brother!  Where Art Thou?

This is, simply a great film.

Set in the 1930s, it really successfully captures the feel of the rural American South at this time, and does a super job of capturing the feel of small towns, farms, and Southern politics.  Clothing details are well done as well.  Minor details, such as references to the Tennessee Valley Authority, or a farmer cultivating a field of tobacco with a mule drawn implement, nicely place the film in context.   Even the title is a shout out to the era, recalling the name of a fictional book which a fictional movie director is getting set to film in 1941's Sullivan's Travels.

Movies In History: Lonesome Dove

Lonesome Dove

This television mini series, based on the Larry McMurtry novel, which itself was closely based on actual events of frontier era cattleman, set a new standard for clothing accuracy. And as the novel was itself closely based on actual persons and their history, the details in general are remarkably accurate.  Indeed, this movie is to Westerns what Band of Brothers is to war movies, in that it set the bar so high, that nothing that's come after it has been the same compared to those films which came before it.

Based closely on actual early cattle drives out of Texas going north, this gritty film has almost all, if not all, of the material details right, which almost no film prior to it did.  Indeed, this is so much the case that I've actually heard it criticized by the otherwise knowledgeable on some of what it portrays as it stands in such stark contrast to earlier films.  No cattle drive film compares to it.

Even wise, it's pretty good as well, showing the slow nature and remoteness of early drives.

If a person was to criticize it, what could be looked at is that like all McMurtry works, it's somewhat more focused on the unseemly side of things than it needs to be, which is McMurtry's hallmark in some ways.  Having said that, McMurtray isn't afraid to show various peoples and groups in a pretty unvarnished light, which many portrayals are not willing to do.

And the economic nature of the drive, without which it wouldn't make any sense, is largely omitted, a fault common to many western  movies.

Having said that, this film sets the bar for westerns.

Movies In History: The Godfather, Part II

The Godfather, Part II

This movie gets on the list not for its portrayal of the Mafia, but for its portrayal of urban New York City in the early 20th Century.  Very well done.

I don't really know enough about the Mafia to really comment on how accurate in general this movie, or the first movie, may be in regard to it, but from what I understand, they are fairly close to accurate in their portrayals and the various crime families are in fact closely based on real ones.  The novel, which is a very good one, no doubt is as well.  This movie really excels in its portrayal of early 20th Century New York Italian ghettos, and it does a nice job with Cuba on the end of revolution in the 1950s as well.

Movies In History: True Grit

True Grit (the Coen Brothers version)

I like the John Wayne version of this movie, but I love the Coen brothers version.

This film is dialog-centric, like most Coen Brothers films are, but in this case the dialog serves to really illustrate something view films do. . .how things sounded like, not just how they looked.  In these regards, this film is superb.

The film is also is excellent in its material details, which most Westerns are not. The clothing is correct, as are the firearms.  The sense of space involved in an expedition of this type is excellently done, and comes across much better in this film than in the early John Wayne version.  That the expedition is basically alone in a wilderness is really conveyed.

The film's ending, true to the novel, is also historically correct, as not a lot of time passes in an historical context, but in a human context, as the film notes, "Twenty five years is a long time."  The changes in the west in the brief ending, and those things that had not changed, are subtly brought out.

It's an excellent movie, and a unique one given the emphasis on the dialog, a detail that it shares with the novel upon which it is based.  An excellent film and one of the best Westerns ever made.

The ABA pivotal scenes (from a lawyer's prospective) on this film.

Society of the Military Horse • View topic - Horsemen In No Man's Land

Society of the Military Horse • View topic - Horsemen In No Man's Land

Movies In History: Valkyrie

Valkyrie

Tom Cruise was criticized for starring and backing this project, which depicts the July 20 Assassination attempt on  Adolph Hitler but the film is excellent.  It includes the most accurate depiction of an fighter strafing run right at the start of the film, which is so well done that it's incredibly scary to watch in a movie theater.

The film gets the tone of the assassination attempt, including its internal divisions, down about as well as a film of this length could.  Suffice it to say, the actual plot was somewhat more complicated, or actually a great deal more complicated, but there's only so much that can be done on film, and even today people debate who all may have been involved in the plot, knew about it, or had a role of some kind. 

In terms of material details, this movie was quite good.  The equipment and the uniforms are all correct for the period shown, with the movie makers having gone to the extent of showing the qualitative differences in various German uniforms and the tailored nature of officers uniform.

A very fine effort, well worth seeing, and historically correct within the confines of the movie's length.

Movies In History: Paper Moon

Paper Moon

This 1973 film came about some decades prior to Oh Brother, Where Art Thou? but it also really has the feel of the Depression right, in this case in the Missouri Kansas border region.  The film surrounds the story of a con artist who arrives in the story just in time for the funeral of a woman with whom, the film strongly suggests, he has, unbeknownst to him, had a child.  The association with the deceased mother, we understand, was illicit in nature, and he never acknowledges at any point in the film that he's the child's father.  He does accept, however, a charge to take the child to an aunt.  From there, a series of adventures ensues.

The gritty nature of the film, filmed entirely in black and white, and the desperation of the protagonist, even though it's a comedy, really come through.  The lack of, or failure of, the social structure also shines through, with it not seeming all that odd, by the end of the film, that a little girl has been essentially been adopted, outside the law, by a man who was in the end a kindhearted stranger, or who may be that.

Filmed in black and white, as noted, even though well within the color film era, the cinematography and the excellent cast give it the right feel.

The protagonists are portrayed by actual father and child Ryan and Tatum O'Neal.  This is Ryan O'Neal's best film, to the extent I've seen his films, and he acts in it quite well.  Tatum O'Neal was brilliant in the film.

In terms of material details, the film is excellent, with the portrayal of Dust Bowl Kansas significantly added to by the use of black and white cinematography.

Movies In History: The Missouri Breaks.

The Missouri Breaks 

This movie is regarded as sort of an "anti Western", which seems to be how most movies that don't fit into the 1950s formula of a Western are regarded. But its a nice treatment of the northern Plains in the late 19th Century.  The Marlon Brando bounty hunter character is really an oddly played character, and I'd exempt that portrayal out of this entry, but the other characters are well played.

Some odd details are actually done correctly in the film which rarely are.  The treatment of a small homestead is correct in appearance and in its small nature, which seems to be rarely done in films. And the clothing is correct, which is somewhat unusual for a film made prior to Lonesome Dove.

Durango

Durango

This film, set just before World War Two, takes place in rural Ireland and involves a cattle drive from one town to another, with the cattle to be sold at a public square in front of the Durango pub, named after the southwest Colorado town.

Based on a novel by the same name (also excellent), the film portrays Ireland right before it really began to change post war, when the Ireland of our classic imaginations still existed.  Well attuned to Irish life, and from an Irish novel, it's very well done and gives us a look at Ireland in history in a way that no other film does to the same extent, although The Quiet Man is in some ways somewhat comparable.  This film is better.

Like The Quiet Man, but only more effectively, this film incorporates a lot of details of Irish rural life into the film in an effective way.   With the novel having been authored by Irish author John B. Keane, it is perhaps not too surprising that this film would do an overall much better, and subtler, job of incorporating such details.

Included in the historical and material details which are worked effectively into the film, the mixed feelings about the United Kingdom and World War Two are portrayed in the film.  As was intended to be done in The Quiet Man, but which was dropped as that fairly long film was dropped, this film includes a subplot involving the Irish Republican Army (which is also in the book), but which is done in a comedic fashion.  The very local nature of the Irish cattle industry is portrayed in the movie very well, as well as the only partially mechanized nature of the country at that time.

It's a Hallmark film, but it portrays the era and the culture very well.

Anatomy of a Murder

Anatomy of a Murder

I'm not a big fan of legal dramas, in part because they tend to be highly inaccurate. But this film, based on a novel written by a judge, is an exception.  Excellently acted, the minute details that show the author had real familiarity with the law really push it over the top for me.  Amongst these details, showing how well the author knew the law, is that the client stiffs the lawyer on his bill in the end.  Only a real lawyer would have included that.

The film portrays the defense of an accused murderer, based on a psychological defense, by a solo practitioner. Excellently acted, with great courtroom scenes that are pretty realistic, and not absurd.

The ABA "pivotol scenes" commentary on this film.

Movies In History: The Culpepper Cattle Company.

The Culpepper Cattle Company 

This Western, which is in someways the antithesis of the classic The Cowboys, is also an "anti-Western" according to reviewers, but probably only because they don't really understand the nature of the late 19th Century West all that well.  Like The Cowboys, it deals with a 19th Century cattle drive, this one starting out in Texas rather than Montana, and it involves a young protagonist.

Filmed in the 1972, this Western has its problems, but in some ways it's really accurate.  It's one of the very few Westerns in which the cattle owner is really concerned about the economic bottom line, making it a very rare Western in which the cattle industry is actually shown as an industry.  The film also gets pretty good marks for getting details of dress partially correct, and for showing the pretty gritty nature of the subjects of the film fairly accurately, if in a somewhat exaggerated fashion.  "The Cowboys" (which I like), or "Red River" (which I also like), it is not.

Sunday, August 2, 1914. First French and German casualties of the Great War.

Germany invaded Luxembourg and demanded passage through Belgium.

German cavalry crossed into France in a local action resulting in at least two deaths in a clash with French militia, those being  Jules-André Peugeot, the first French military casualty of the war, and Albert Mayer, the first German casualty.

The countries were not yet at war.

Mayer was in command of the cavalry patrol and opened hostilities by first charging a sentry and then firing at Corporal Peugeot, who ordered him to stop and indicated the illegally present patrol was under arrest.

Mayer fire upon and killed Peugeot and the died when the French troops opened up on him. The illegal border crossers then retreated.

The patrol should not have been in France.

Germany signed a secret alliance with the Ottoman Empire.  It stated:

Constantinople, August 2, 1914

1. The two contracting parties agree to observe strict neutrality in regard to the present conflict between Austria-Hungary and Serbia.

2. In case Russia should intervene with active military measures, and should thus bring about a casus foederis for Germany with relation to Austria-Hungary, this casus foederis would also come into existence for Turkey.

3. In case of war, Germany will leave her military mission at the disposal of Turkey. The latter, for her part, assures the said military mission an effective influence on the general conduct of the army, in accordance with the understanding arrived at directly between His Excellency the Minister of War and His Excellency the Chief of the Military Mission.

4. Germany obligates herself, if necessary by force of arms ... [ cipher group lacking] Ottoman territory in case it should be threatened.

5. This agreement which has been concluded for the purpose of protecting both Empires from international complications which may result from the present conflict goes into force as soon as it is signed by the above-mentioned plenipotentiaries, and shall remain valid, together with any similar mutual agreements, until December 31, 1918.

6. In case it shall not be denounced by one of the high contracting parties six months before the expiration of the term named above, this treaty shall remain in force for a further period of five years.

7. This present document shall be ratified by His Majesty the German Emperor, King of Prussia, and by His Majesty the Emperor of the Ottomans, and the ratifications shall be exchanged within a period of one month from the date of its signing.

8. The present treaty shall remain secret and can only be made public as a result of an agreement arrived at between the two high contracting parties. In testimony whereof, etc.

BARON v. WANGENHEIM

SAID HALIM

WANGENHEIM 

The German Navy bombarded Liepaja, Lativa, part of the Russian Empire.

St. Pope Pius X issued what would be his last public pronouncement, which stated:

EXHORTATION

DUM EUROPA

OF POPE PIUS X

TO CATHOLICS IN THE ENTIRE WORLD

While nearly all Europe is being dragged into the storm of an extremely gruesome war, of which no one can foresee the dangers, the massacres, and the consequences without feeling oppressed by the sorrow and by the horror, also We could not but be concerned and could not but feel Our soul torn by the most poignant pain for the safety and for the lives of so many individuals and peoples for whose welfare We are supremely solicitous.

Amidst these upheavals and dangers, We absolutely feel and realize that Our fatherly charity and Our apostolic ministry demand of Us to direct the minds of all the Christian faithful to Him from Whom alone help can come, towards Christ, we say, the Prince of Peace and the all-powerful Mediator between God and men.

Therefore, We exhort the Catholics of the entire world to turn to His throne of grace and mercy, first of all the clergy; that they, under their Bishops, institute special public supplications in their respective parishes so that God, touched by piety of these prayers, may take away as soon as possible the disastrous scourge of war and inspire those who preside over the commonwealths to think thoughts of peace, and not of affliction.

From the Vatican, August 2, 1914

The Scandinavian Monetary Union between Sweden, Norway, and Denmark ended due to the outbreak of war.

Last edition:

Saturday, August 1, 1914. Germany declares war on Russia.

Labels: 1910s, 1914, Austro Hungaria, Economics, France, German Kriegsmarine, Germany, Italy, Poland, Royal Navy, Russia, Switzerland, Triple Alliance, World War One

Some Gave All: Oklahoma City National Memorial & Museum, Oklahoma...

Some Gave All: Oklahoma City National Memorial & Museum, Oklahoma...: These photos are of the city block that is now a memorial to those who lost their lives in the tragic and senseless bombing of the Murrah...

12 movies with pivotal lessons featuring lawyers

12 movies with pivotal lessons featuring lawyers

War and Commentary on War

Recently, Israel has sent troops into Gaza.  And Israel has been using heavy weapons as part of that. When heavy weapons are used in urban areas, civilian deaths result.  That's been sparking tons of criticism on Israel, but seemingly missed on that is that the Israeli action was prompted by the Hamas use of heavy weapons, in the form of rockets, on Israeli civilian targets.

I don't post here to be an apologist for Israel.  I've never been that.  But I am amazed by the degree of self righteousness that people in North American and Europe have exhibited over this event.  Frankly,. the Palestinian voters who voted Hamas into office in the Palestinian Authority, and who support it now, might has well have pulled the lanyard on Israeli artillery.

For the simple reason that we do not wish to believe that its true, people in the western world simply refuse to believe that in their heart of hearts, members of Hamas are not liberal democrats.  They are not.  They adhere to a version of the world that is similar, if not identical, to that shared by ISIL, which is now operating to destroy Christianity in Iraq in the name of a Sunni Caliphate.  Hamas, which is backed by Iran, wouldn't argue for a Sunni Caliphate, but it does imagine a Middle East that's a theocracy. That vision doesn't allow for a Jewish state in its midst.  If it could effect its goals, which thankfully it cannot, things would be grim for the Jewish residents of Israel indeed.

If Hamas cannot bring about its goals, it can and does kill, and has been.  And at some point, if you shell a country with an Army, that country is going to react.  And if you hide your own guerrilla bands in a city, that city is going to be a target.

None of this excuses the indiscriminate use of force, nor does it even perhaps justify force.  But it doesn't justify the excusing of a basic set of facts either, those being that to date there has not been a single Arabic nation on earth, save for the problematic example of Lebanon (formed as Christian state carved out from Syria originally) that has demonstrated the ability to function as a secular democracy.  Twice in recent years, the Palestinian Authority being one example, and Egypt being another, chances for democracy have shown a high percentage of the population willing to throw in with theocratic parties that are troubling in nature.  People a re instinctively democratic, and certainly the examples we've seen globally show that the fostering of democracy can take decades to be successful.  There's nothing to suggest that the neighbors of such states will be willing to chalk up violent attacks against them to political infancy and just sit it out.

I frankly don't know what the solution to this problem is here.  Gaza is clearly untenable as a political entity.  It's an isolated city that's hopeless in its isolation.  It can't be part of Israel as that would not work.  Egypt wants nothing to do with it.  Rationality would argue for buying out the residents and urging  them to move elsewhere where things were better, which would be nearly anywhere, but long history has demonstrated that the Arab states are pretty intolerant toward taking in refugee populations.  This is no wonder, given that almost every single Arab nation is ruled in a fashion that's simply a house of cards.  So, for example, it makes more sense for Dubai or Saudi Arabia to bring in huge numbers of Filipinos, from their prospective, than it would to offer and encourage a funded new home for their fellow Arabs, who wouldn't take them up on that offer anyhow.  But rocketing Israel isn't going to get them what they want either, which largely would seem to be Hamas' goal that Israel simply not be.

Additionally, there's more than a little irony, albeit one that apparently isn't very much appreciated, by populations in the western world lecturing Israel, when Israel remains quite aware that it came into existence as the greater European culture participated in a pretty dedicated effort to wipe the Jewish culture in the 1930s and 1940s.  It'd be hard, from the prospective of people who have experienced that well within historical memory, to feel that they shouldn't act to defend themselves, and that others will not act to aid them. Again, I"m not an apologist for Israel, but to a certain degree it's hard not to feel that in recent decades proclivities that had seemingly died in 1945 have creeped back in a tad, and even if they haven't, it'd be hard for Israelis not to wonder if they have.

Finally, I have to wonder why it is that one population of suffering Arabs, whom I fully concede are suffering, and many of whom are completely innocent of anything, receive the attention they deserve, while another, differing mainly in their traditional stability and Faith, are ignored. 

Friday Farming: Ranch, Mesa Arizona 1908

Saturday, August 1, 1914. Germany declares war on Russia.

Germany declared war on Russia and started to mobilize.

Germany and Russia shared a common border in Poland at the time, parts of which were occupied by both empires.

Italy, part of the Triple Alliance that included Austro Hungaria and Germany, declared neutrality in the war breaking out on the basis that the alliance was defensive, not offensive, in nature.

Germany accepted a British offer to guarantee French neutrality.

The Royal Navy ordered two British battleship to prevent the SMS Goeben and SMS Breslau from breaking out of the Mediterranean into the Atlantic.

The New York Stock Exchange closed due to the war.

The Swiss National Park was established.

Last edition:

Friday, July 31, 1914. Russia mobilizes.

Labels: 1910s, 1914, Armenia, Crime, France, Germany, Oklahoma, panoramic, Russia, Russian Army, Socialism, Swiss Air Force, Switzerland, World War One

Friday, July 31, 1914. Russia mobilizes.

Czar Nicholas II ordered the full mobilization of the Imperial Russian Army.

Kaiser Wilhelm issued a decree to the German people, depicted below:

It's extremely difficult, to say the least, to imagine how anyone could see the German cause in the erupting war as just in any fashion.

The 8th Congress of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation was held in Turkey to discuss asking for autonomy for Russian Armenia.

Inflation began to ramp up.  The London Stock Exchange closed, and would remained closed, for the rest of the year.

French Socialist leader Jean Jaurès by nationalist Raoul Villain.  Jaurès  was scheduled to attend an anti war conference of the International on August 9.

The Swiss Air Forces was established.

Drumright, Oklahoma, July 31, 1914.

Last edition:

Thursday, July 30, 1914. Bringing an action, if possible.

Labels: 1910s, 1914, German Kriegsmarine, Grigori Rasputin, Royal Navy, Seattle Washington, Washington (Seattle), Winston Churchill, World War One

The Big Speech: Trees

1918. Poet Joyce Kilmer, U.S. Army sergeant, killed in France.

TREES

I think that I shall never see
A poem lovely as a tree.

A tree whose hungry mouth is prest
Against the sweet earth's flowing breast;

A tree that looks at God all day,
And lifts her leafy arms to pray;

A tree that may in summer wear
A nest of robins in her hair;

Upon whose bosom snow has lain;
Who intimately lives with rain.

Poems are made by fools like me,
But only God can make a tree .

Thursday, July 30, 1914. Bringing an action, if possible.

Let Papa plan not war, for with the war will come the end of Russia and yourselves, and you will lose to the last man.

Grigori Rasputin; telegram to Imperial Russian Lady in Waiting, Anna Vyrubova, July 30, 1914.

First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill instructed  Royal Navy Commander of the Mediterranean Fleet Admiral Archibald Berkeley Milne "to aid the French in the transportation of their African Army by covering, and if possible, bringing to action individual fast German ships, particularly Goeben, who may interfere in that action."

A disaster in seattle:

Seattle's Grand Trunk Pacific dock burns on July 30, 1914.

Last edition:

Wednesday, July 29, 1914 First shots.

Labels: 1910s, 1914, Austro Hungaria, Austro Hungarian Navy, Massachetts, Serbia, technology, Technology is ruining everything, telephone, World War One

MId Week At Work: Elevator Operator

At one time nearly every elevator had an operator.  Now elevator operators are rare, and where they exist are sort of a luxury throwback to a once common occupation.  They had operators, as they were not simple to operate at first, and then later required some operation in any event.

One of the great dramatic comedies of the 1960s (really reflecting the post World War Two, mid 60s United States) featured Shirley McClain in the role of an elevator girl, that being The Apartment.

Wednesday, July 29, 1914 First shots.

The first shots of the Great War were fired at 10:00 local time when the SMS Bodrog, a river monitor, bombarded Belgrade following Serbia blowing up the only major bridge across the Sava, severing the land link between the countries.

Amazingly, the ship still exists and after a long and varied career, is now a Serbian museum ship.

The first transcontinental telephone line was completed between New York and San Francisco.

The Cape Cod Canal opened in Massachusetts.

Last edition:

July 28, 1914. WAR.

WAR

The Big Speech: Liesure, by W. H. Davies

What is this life if, full of care,

We have no time to stand and stare.

No time to stand beneath the boughs

And stare as long as sheep or cows.

No time to see, when woods we pass,

Where squirrels hide their nuts in grass.

No time to see, in broad daylight,

Streams full of stars, like skies at night.

No time to turn at Beauty's glance,

And watch her feet, how they can dance.

No time to wait till her mouth can

Enrich that smile her eyes began.

A poor life this if, full of care,

We have no time to stand and stare.

July 28, 1914. WAR.

WAR

World War One had arrived, even as more remote press outlets reported hope that it might be averted.  Austro Hungaria transmitted its declaration of war against Serbia by telegram, something sort of weirdly akin to doing it by Twitter today, assuming that anyone actually bothered to declare war in our modern era.

Repression of the Catholic Church commenced in Mexico, and was to be an enduring feature of the Mexican Republic for decades, causing long lasting damage ot the faith of the nation.

The Royal Navy and the French Navy were ordered to capture the  Goeben and Breslau which had been under repair in the Adriatic.  The ships bolted for the Dardanelles.

The first launch of an aerial torpedo was accomplished by the Royal Navy Air Service.

Last edition:

Monday, July 27, 1914. Taking sides.

Labels: 1910s, 1914, Austro Hungaria, baseball, Germany, July Crisis, The Law of Unintended Consequences, United Kingdom, World War One

The Big Picture: Union Stock Yards, Chicago Illinois 1907

The 33% not thrilled by their phones

Three out of the four of us acquired new cell phones yesterday.  33% of those recipients are not thrilled about it.

I'm in that 33%.

I was a late adopter of cell phones.  Having a thing that I could pack around all the time to take calls didn't strike me as something that I wanted to do, and my early experiences with people who thought they were the niftiest thing ever didn't do much to change my mind on that.  But, due to work and the adoption of technology in business, I ended up having to do it, taking at first one of my wife's cast off phones.

Following that, I was slow to adopt the smart phone.  I just wasn't that impressed.  But there came a time when I was tracking settlement negotiations in a case and found I was hindered without one. So on came the Iphone.

I just upgraded my Iphone to the Iphone 5s.  Not because I feel I must have the latest and greatest, but rather because as my Iphone 4 aged, and as new programs for Iphones seemed to come on at a steady speed, its battery life was down to way too short.  As I have adopted the use of the phone for electronic airline tickets, a feature I do indeed like, and as I travel around in that role a fair amount, this was becoming a problem. So I decided to upgrade to a new phone which will hopefully have a longer battery life.

My wife, and now my son, take care of all phone stuff as I'm way too disinterested in phones to bother with them, and as they really like cell phones. So when upgrading, they found a whole bunch of upgrades were available for their phones, and now there are three new smart phones in the family, only one of which is an Iphone.

They're thrilled, but they're bothered that I'm not thrilled.  And I'm not.  Its hard to get excited about a piece of equipment that I was never keen on in the first place and which intrudes on things at every hour of the day, everywhere.  I recognize what a brilliant piece of technology they are, but having an Iphone is sort of like having Steve Jobs following me around all day, eating in my kitchen, and screaming messages at me whether I want them or not.  The features I really like on the, the ability to get podcasts and listen to music, don't have much to do with the phone part.

It isn't that I don't like some of the things smart phones have brought to us.  I do.  I like the fact that text messaging, and the fact that everyone carries these things everywhere anymore, mean that I can catch up with my family, and vice versa, nearly effortlessly.

But there's no denying that cell phones have brought work into the home, and been a factor in the 24 hour a day work place as well.  And they mean that conversations that can wait of all types, now have to take place instantly.

Yesterday afternoon, I was high in the mountains at a cattle camp, and while there, there was a conversation about cell phones, and which ones sort of work on the mountain, and which ones don't.  Satellite phones even came into the conversation.  While I didn't say it, the fact that there's no cell phone service up there strikes me as a good thing, and while I know that day is ending, and will end soon, I'll be sorry to see it end. And it's hard not to look back to an era well within my memory when there were no cell phones, and a lot of places in my world were much remoter.  I miss that.