Ostensibly exploring the practice of law before the internet. Heck, before good highways for that matter.
Sunday, May 2, 2021
May 2, 1921. Uprising in Upper Silesia
Drawdown in Afghanistan
I'll of course add some commentary on the way, assuming this blog survives Google's effort to render blogspot obsolete.
While this post is going up on April 18, it includes the old posts from the Wars thread that started with President Biden's announcement of earlier this past week.
April 15, 2021
United States v. Taliban.
THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon. I’m speaking to you today from the Roosevelt — the Treaty Room in the White House. The same spot where, on October of 2001, President George W. Bush informed our nation that the United States military had begun strikes on terrorist training camps in Afghanistan. It was just weeks — just weeks after the terrorist attack on our nation that killed 2,977 innocent souls; that turned Lower Manhattan into a disaster area, destroyed parts of the Pentagon, and made hallowed ground of a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and sparked an American promise that we would “never forget.”
We went to Afghanistan in 2001 to root out al Qaeda, to prevent future terrorist attacks against the United States planned from Afghanistan. Our objective was clear. The cause was just. Our NATO Allies and partners rallied beside us. And I supported that military action, along with overwhelming majority of the members of Congress.
More than seven years later, in 2008, weeks before we swore the oath of office — President Obama and I were about to swear — President Obama asked me to travel to Afghanistan and report back on the state of the war in Afghanistan. I flew to Afghanistan, to the Kunar Valley — a rugged, mountainous region on the border with Pakistan. What I saw on that trip reinforced my conviction that only the Afghans have the right and responsibility to lead their country, and that more and endless American military force could not create or sustain a durable Afghan government.
I believed that our presence in Afghanistan should be focused on the reason we went in the first place: to ensure Afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again. We did that. We accomplished that objective.
I said, among — with others, we’d follow Osama bin Laden to the gates of hell if need be. That’s exactly what we did, and we got him. It took us close to 10 years to put President Obama’s commitment to — into form. And that’s exactly what happened; Osama bin Laden was gone.
That was 10 years ago. Think about that. We delivered justice to bin Laden a decade ago, and we’ve stayed in Afghanistan for a decade since. Since then, our reasons for remaining in Afghanistan are becoming increasingly unclear, even as the terrorist threat that we went to fight evolved.
Over the past 20 years, the threat has become more dispersed, metastasizing around the globe: al-Shabaab in Somalia; al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula; al-Nusra in Syria; ISIS attempting to create a califit [caliphate] in Syria and Iraq, and establishing affiliates in multiple countries in Africa and Asia.
With the terror threat now in many places, keeping thousands of troops grounded and concentrated in just one country at a cost of billions each year makes little sense to me and to our leaders. We cannot continue the cycle of extending or expanding our military presence in Afghanistan, hoping to create ideal conditions for the withdrawal, and expecting a different result.
I’m now the fourth United States President to preside over American troop presence in Afghanistan: two Republicans, two Democrats. I will not pass this responsibility on to a fifth.
After consulting closely with our allies and partners, with our military leaders and intelligence personnel, with our diplomats and our development experts, with the Congress and the Vice President, as well as with Mr. Ghani and many others around the world, I have concluded that it’s time to end America’s longest war. It’s time for American troops to come home.
When I came to office, I inherited a diplomatic agreement, duly negotiated between the government of the United States and the Taliban, that all U.S. forces would be out of Afghanistan by May 1, 2021, just three months after my inauguration. That’s what we inherited — that commitment.
It is perhaps not what I would have negotiated myself, but it was an agreement made by the United States government, and that means something. So, in keeping with that agreement and with our national interests, the United States will begin our final withdrawal — begin it on May 1 of this year.
We will not conduct a hasty rush to the exit. We’ll do it — we’ll do it responsibly, deliberately, and safely. And we will do it in full coordination with our allies and partners, who now have more forces in Afghanistan than we do.
And the Taliban should know that if they attack us as we draw down, we will defend ourselves and our partners with all the tools at our disposal.
Our allies and partners have stood beside us shoulder-to-shoulder in Afghanistan for almost 20 years, and we’re deeply grateful for the contributions they have made to our shared mission and for the sacrifices they have borne.
The plan has long been “in together, out together.” U.S. troops, as well as forces deployed by our NATO Allies and operational partners, will be out of Afghanistan before we mark the 20th anniversary of that heinous attack on September 11th.
But — but we’ll not take our eye off the terrorist threat. We’ll reorganize our counterterrorism capabilities and the substantial assets in the region to prevent reemergence of terrorists — of the threat to our homeland from over the horizon. We’ll hold the Taliban accountable for its commitment not to allow any terrorists to threaten the United States or its allies from Afghan soil. The Afghan government has made that commitment to us as well. And we’ll focus our full attention on the threat we face today.
At my direction, my team is refining our national strategy to monitor and disrupt significant terrorist threats not only in Afghanistan, but anywhere they may arise — and they’re in Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and elsewhere.
I spoke yesterday with President Bush to inform him of my decision. While he and I have had many disagreements over policies throughout the years, we’re absolutely united in our respect and support for the valor, courage, and integrity of the women and men of the United States Armed Forces who served. I’m immensely grateful for the bravery and backbone that they have shown through nearly two decades of combat deployments. We as a nation are forever indebted to them and to their families.
You all know that less than 1 percent of Americans serve in our armed forces. The remaining 99 percent of them — we owe them. We owe them. They have never backed down from a single mission that we’ve asked of them.
I’ve witnessed their bravery firsthand during my visits to Afghanistan. They’ve never wavered in their resolve. They’ve paid a tremendous price on our behalf. And they have the thanks of a grateful nation.
While we will not stay involved in Afghanistan militarily, our diplomatic and humanitarian work will continue. We’ll continue to support the government of Afghanistan. We will keep providing assistance to the Afghan National Defenses and Security Forces.And along with our partners, we have trained and equipped a standing force of over 300,000 Afghan personnel today and hundreds of thousands over the past two decades. And they’ll continue to fight valiantly, on behalf of the Afghans, at great cost. They’ll support peace talks, as we will support peace talks between the government of Afghanistan and the Taliban, facilitated by the United Nations. And we’ll continue to support the rights of Afghan women and girls by maintaining significant humanitarian and development assistance.
And we’ll ask other countries — other countries in the region — to do more to support Afghanistan, especially Pakistan, as well as Russia, China, India, and Turkey. They all have a significant stake in the stable future for Afghanistan.
And over the next few months, we will also determine what a continued U.S. diplomatic presence in Afghanistan will look like, including how we’ll ensure the security of our diplomats.
Look, I know there are many who will loudly insist that diplomacy cannot succeed without a robust U.S. military presence to stand as leverage. We gave that argument a decade. It’s never proved effective — not when we had 98,000 troops in Afghanistan, and not when we were down to a few thousand.
Our diplomacy does not hinge on having boots in harm’s way — U.S. boots on the ground. We have to change that thinking. American troops shouldn’t be used as a bargaining chip between warring parties in other countries. You know, that’s nothing more than a recipe for keeping American troops in Afghanistan indefinitely.
I also know there are many who will argue that we should stay — stay fighting in Afghanistan because withdrawal would damage America’s credibility and weaken America’s influence in the world. I believe the exact opposite is true.
We went to Afghanistan because of a horrific attack that happened 20 years ago. That cannot explain why we should remain there in 2021.
Rather than return to war with the Taliban, we have to focus on the challenges that are in front of us. We have to track and disrupt terrorist networks and operations that spread far beyond Afghanistan since 9/11.
We have to shore up American competitiveness to meet the stiff competition we’re facing from an increasingly assertive China. We have to strengthen our alliances and work with like-minded partners to ensure that the rules of international norms that govern cyber threats and emerging technologies that will shape our future are grounded in our democratic values — values — not those of the autocrats.
We have to defeat this pandemic and strengthen the global health system to prepare for the next one, because there will be another pandemic.
You know, we’ll be much more formidable to our adversaries and competitors over the long term if we fight the battles for the next 20 years, not the last 20.
And finally, the main argument for staying longer is what each of my three predecessors have grappled with: No one wants to say that we should be in Afghanistan forever, but they insist now is not the right moment to leave.
In 2014, NATO issued a declaration affirming that Afghan Security Forces would, from that point on, have full responsibility for their country’s security by the end of that year. That was seven years ago.
So when will it be the right moment to leave? One more year, two more years, ten more years? Ten, twenty, thirty billion dollars more above the trillion we’ve already spent?“Not now” — that’s how we got here. And in this moment, there’s a significant downside risk to staying beyond May 1st without a clear timetable for departure.
If we instead pursue the approach where America — U.S. exit is tied to conditions on the ground, we have to have clear answers to the following questions: Just what conditions require to — be required to allow us to depart? By what means and how long would it take to achieve them, if they could be achieved at all? And at what additional cost in lives and treasure?
I’m not hearing any good answers to these questions. And if you can’t answer them, in my view, we should not stay. The fact is that, later today, I’m going to visit Arlington National Cemetery, Section 60, and that sacred memorial to American sacrifice.
Section sisty [sic] — Section 60 is where our recent war dead are buried, including many of the women and men who died fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. There’s no — there’s no comforting distance in history in Section 60. The grief is raw. It’s a visceral reminder of the living cost of war.
For the past 12 years, ever since I became Vice President, I’ve carried with me a card that reminds me of the exact number of American troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. That exact number, not an approximation or rounded-off number — because every one of those dead are sacred human beings who left behind entire families. An exact accounting of every single solitary one needs to be had.
As of the day — today, there are two hundred and forty- — 2,488 [2,448] U.S. troops and personnel who have died in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Freedom’s Sentinel — our Afghanistan conflicts. 20,722 have been wounded.
I’m the first President in 40 years who knows what it means to have a child serving in a warzone. And throughout this process, my North Star has been remembering what it was like when my late son, Beau, was deployed to Iraq — how proud he was to serve his country; how insistent he was to deploy with his unit; and the impact it had on him and all of us at home.
We already have service members doing their duty in Afghanistan today whose parents served in the same war. We have service members who were not yet born when our nation was attacked on 9/11.
War in Afghanistan was never meant to be a multi-generational undertaking. We were attacked. We went to war with clear goals. We achieved those objectives. Bin Laden is dead, and al Qaeda is degraded in Iraq — in Afghanistan. And it’s time to end the forever war.
Thank you all for listening. May God protect our troops. May God bless all those families who lost someone in this endeavor.
April 17, 2021
United States v. Taliban, cont.
Interestingly enough, the drawdown in Afghanistan is now predicted to temporarily increase the US troop presence in Afghanistan. This includes reasons that run from logistical to force protection needs during the drawdown.
In addition to the 2,500 U.S. troops being withdrawn, it should be noted, 7,000 allied troops will also be withdrawn. It's little appreciated that the US forces amount to only about 1/4 of the non Afghan forces supporting the Afghan government.
April 18, 2021
United States v. Taliban.
Wyoming Representative Elizabeth Cheney has strongly criticized President Biden's announcement to withdraw from Afghanistan. Cheney was also a strong critic of President Trump on the same issue.
May 1, 2021
The US withdrawal commenced.
Sunday Morning Scene: Churches of the West: St. Peter's Catholic Church, Carpenter Wyoming
St. Peter's Catholic Church, Carpenter Wyoming
This is St. Peter's Catholic Church in Carpenter, Wyoming. The Church is served by St. Paul's parish in Pine Bluffs, which is the closest Wyoming town to Carpenter.
As with the Methodist Church in Carpenter which is discussed immediately below, I don't know the age of this Prairie Gothic style church in tiny unincorporated Carpenter. My suspicion is that the church is nearly as old as Carpenter, but I don't have the immediate information on that.
The Best Posts of the Week of April 25, 2021
The best posts of the week of April 25, 2021.
A city in Maryland should not get to be its own state.
A question for writers of fiction.
Saturday, May 1, 2021
May 1, 1941. An Historical May Day
May 1, 1941, was remarkable for a whole host of things, not only in the war, but even in popular culture. You can read about those here:
Today in World War II History—May 1, 1941
Defense bonds, CheeriOs, Citizen Kane. . . wow.
CheeriOs, or Cheerios, were apparently originally called CheeriOats.
It was the start of the worst week of the Liverpool Blitz as well, pretty grim news. Also grim, Gross-Rosen became an independent concentration camp. 40,000 would die there.
The Germans attempted to breach the British defenses at Tobruk, and failed.
Friday, April 30, 2021
A question for writers of fiction.
If you are a fiction writer, by which I mean novels, how many significant, or central, characters do you feel is the limit for a novel, assuming you feel there is a limit?
To Kill A Mockingbird, by my recollection, has basically five. The Killer Angels, on the other hand, has at least seven and probably more like ten, if I recall correctly. War And Peace has enough of such characters such that keeping them all in mind is a bit difficult, even though it is, in my view, the greatest work of fiction ever written. The small Irish classic Durango has seven or eight. McMurtry's magnum opus Lonesome Dove is centered on two, but they interact with a bare minimum of eleven other significant characters, and at least that many minor ones.
Thoughs?
April 30, 1921 Pope Benedict XV issued In Praeclara Summorum
Pope Benedict XV issued In Praeclara Summorum on Dante Alighieri. It reads:
Beloved Children,
Health and the Apostolic Benediction.
Among the many celebrated geniuses of whom the
Catholic faith can boast who have left undying fruits in literature and art
especially, besides other fields of learning, and to whom civilization and
religion are ever in debt, highest stands the name of Dante Alighieri, the
sixth centenary of whose death will soon be recorded. Never perhaps has his
supreme position been recognized as it is today. Not only Italy, justly proud
of having given him birth, but all the civil nations are preparing with special
committees of learned men to celebrate his memory that the whole world may pay
honour to that noble figure, pride and glory of humanity.
2. And surely we cannot be absent from this
universal consensus of good men; rather should We take the lead in it as the
Church has special right to call Alighieri hers.
3. So, just as at the beginning of Our
Pontificate by a Letter to the Archbishop of Ravenna We promoted the
restoration of the temple where the ashes of the poet lie, so now, to initiate
the cycle of the centenary celebrations, it has seemed most opportune to Us to
speak to you all, beloved children, who cultivate letters under the maternal
vigilance of the Church, to show even more clearly than before the intimate
union of Dante with this Chair of Peter, and how the praises showered on that
distinguished name necessarily redound in no small measure to the honour of the
Catholic Church.
4. And first of all, inasmuch as the divine poet
throughout his whole life professed in exemplary manner the Catholic religion,
he would surely desire that this solemn commemoration should take place, as
indeed will be the case, under the auspices of religion, and if it is carried
out in San Francesco in Ravenna it should begin in San Giovanni in Florence to
which his thoughts turned during the last years of his life with the desire of
being crowned poet at the very font where he had received Baptism. Dante lived
in an age which inherited the most glorious fruits of philosophical and
theological teaching and thought, and handed them on to the succeeding ages
with the imprint of the strict scholastic method. Amid the various currents of
thought diffused then too among learned men Dante ranged himself as disciple of
that Prince of the school so distinguished for angelic temper of intellect,
Saint Thomas Aquinas. From him he gained nearly all his philosophical and
theological knowledge, and while he did not neglect any branch of human
learning, at the same time he drank deeply at the founts of Sacred Scripture and
the Fathers. Thus he learned almost all that could be known in his time, and
nourished specially by Christian knowledge, it was on that field of religion he
drew when he set himself to treat in verse of things so vast and deep. So that
while we admire the greatness and keenness of his genius, we have to recognize,
too, the measure in which he drew inspiration from the Divine Faith by means of
which he could beautify his immortal poems with all the lights of revealed
truths as well as with the splendours of art. Indeed, his Commedia,
which deservedly earned the title of Divina, while it uses various
symbolic images and records the lives of mortals on earth, has for its true aim
the glorification of the justice and providence of God who rules the world through
time and all eternity and punishes and rewards the actions of individuals and
human society. It is thus that, according to the Divine Revelation, in this
poem shines out the majesty of God One and Three, the Redemption of the human
race operated by the Word of God made Man, the supreme loving-kindness and
charity of Mary, Virgin and Mother, Queen of Heaven, and lastly the glory on
high of Angels, Saints and men; then the terrible contrast to this, the pains
of the impious in Hell; then the middle world, so to speak, between Heaven and
Hell, Purgatory, the Ladder of souls destined after expiation to supreme
beatitude. It is indeed marvellous how he was able to weave into all three
poems these three dogmas with truly wrought design. If the progress of science
showed later that that conception of the world rested on no sure foundation,
that the spheres imagined by our ancestors did not exist, that nature, the
number and course of the planets and stars, are not indeed as they were then
thought to be, still the fundamental principle remained that the universe,
whatever be the order that sustains it in its parts, is the work of the
creating and preserving sign of Omnipotent God, who moves and governs all, and
whose glory risplende in una parte piu e meno altrove; and though
this earth on which we live may not be the centre of the universe as at one
time was thought, it was the scene of the original happiness of our first
ancestors, witness of their unhappy fall, as too of the Redemption of mankind
through the Passion and Death of Jesus Christ. Therefore the divine poet
depicted the triple life of souls as he imagined it in a such way as to
illuminate with the light of the true doctrine of the faith the condemnation of
the impious, the purgation of the good spirits and the eternal happiness of the
blessed before the final judgment.
5. But among the truths that shine out in the
triple poem of Alighieri as in his other works We think that these things may
serve as teaching for men of our times. That Christians should pay highest
reverence to the Sacred Scripture and accept what it contains with perfect
docility he proclaims when he says that "Though many are the writers of
the Divine Word nevertheless there is but one Dictator, God, Who has deigned to
show us His goodwill through the pens of many" (Mon. III, 4).
Glorious expression of a great truth. Again, when he says that "The Old
and the New Testament, prescribed for eternity, as the Prophet says, contain
'spiritual teachings transcending human reason,' given 'by the Holy Ghost who
by means of the Prophets and sacred writings, through Jesus Christ coeternal
Son of God and through His disciples revealed the supernatural truth necessary
for us"' (Mon. III, 3, 16). And therefore regarding the life to
come "It is assured by the true doctrine of Christ who is the Way, the
Truth and the Life: the Way because by that way we advance without hindrance to
the happiness of that immortality; the Truth because He is free from all error;
the Light because He enlightens us in the darkness of ignorance of this
world" (Conv. II, 9). And no less reverence he pays to "those
venerable Great Councils the presence of Christ in which no one of the faithful
doubts"; and great is his esteem for "writings of the Doctors,
Augustine and the others, and if any one doubt that they were aided by the Holy
Ghost either he has not seen their fruits or if he has seen he has not
tasted" (Mon. III, 3).
6. No need to recall Alighieri's great reverence
for the authority of the Catholic Church, the account in which he holds the
power of the Roman Pontiff as the base of every law and institution of that
Church. Hence the outspoken warning to Christians: You have the Old and the New
Testament: the Pastor of the Church as Guide; Let that suffice for your salvation.
He felt the troubles of the Church as his own, and while he deplored and
condemned all rebellion against its Supreme Head he wrote as follows to the
Italian Cardinals during the stay at Avignon: "To us who confess the same
Father and Son, the same God and Man, the same Mother and Virgin; to us for
whom and for whose salvation the message was given, after the triple Lovest
thou Me? Feed My sacred sheepfold; to us, driven to mourn with Jeremias - but
not over things to come but over things that are - for Rome - that Rome on
which Christ, after all the old pomp and triumph, confirmed by word and work
the empire of the world, and which Peter, too, and Paul the Apostle of the
Nations consecrated with their very blood as Apostolic See - now widowed and
desolate; to us it is as terrible grief to see this as to see the tragedy of
heresy" (Epist. VIII). For him the Roman Church is The Most Holy
Mother, Bride of Him Crucified and to Peter, infallible judge of revealed
truths, is owing perfect submission in matters of faith and morals. Hence,
however much he may hold that the dignity of the Emperor is derived immediately
from God, still he asserts that this truth "must not be understood so
strictly as to mean that the Roman Prince is not subject to the Roman Pontiff in
anything, because this mortal happiness is subjected in certain measure to
immortal happiness" (Mon. III, 16). Excellent and wise principle
indeed which, if it were observed today as it ought to be, would bring to
States abundant fruits of civil prosperity. But, it will be said, he inveighs
with terrible bitterness against the Supreme Pontiffs of his times. True; but
it was against those who differed from him in politics and he thought were on
the side of those who had driven him from his country. One can feel for a man
so beaten down by fortune, if with lacerated mind he breaks out sometimes into
words of excessive blame, the more so that, to increase his feeling, false
statements were being made by his political enemies ready, as always happens,
to give an evil interpretation to everything. And indeed, since, through mortal
infirmity, "by worldly dust even religious hearts must needs be
soiled" (St. Leo M. S. IV de Quadrag), it cannot be denied that at that
time there were matters on which the clergy might be reproved, and a mind as
devoted to the Church as was that of Dante could not but feel disgust while we
know, too, that reproof came also from men of conspicuous holiness. But,
however he might inveigh, rightly or wrongly, against ecclesiastical personages,
never did he fail in respect due to the Church and reverence for the
"Supreme Keys"; and on the political side he laid down as rule for
his views "the reverence which a good son should show towards his father,
a dutiful son to his mother, to Christ, to the Church, to the Supreme Pastor,
to all who profess the Christian religion, for the safeguarding of truth"
(Mon. III, 3).
7. Thus, as he based the whole structure of his
poem on these sound religious principles, no wonder that we find in it a
treasure of Catholic teaching; not only, that is, essence of Christian
philosophy and theology, but the compendium of the divine laws which should
govern the constitution and administration of States; for Dante Alighieri was
not a man to maintain, for the purpose of giving greater glory to country or
pleasure to ruler, that the State may neglect justice and right which he knew
well to be the main foundation of civil nations.
8. Wonderful, therefore, is the intellectual
enjoyment that we gain from the study of the great poet, and no less the profit
for the student making more perfect his artistic taste and more keen his zeal
for virtue, as long as he keeps his mind free from prejudice and open to accept
truth. Indeed, while there is no lack of great Catholic poets who combine the
useful with the enjoyable, Dante has the singular merit that while he
fascinates the reader with wonderful variety of pictures, with marvelously
lifelike colouring, with supreme expression and thought, he draws him also to
the love of Christian knowledge, and all know how he said openly that he
composed his poem to bring to all "vital nourishment." And we know
now too how, through God's grace, even in recent times, many who were far from,
though not averse to Jesus Christ, and studied with affection the Divina
Commedia, began by admiring the truths of the Catholic Faith and finished
by throwing themselves with enthusiasm into the arms of the Church.
9. What We have said above suffices to show how
opportune it is that on the occasion of this world centenary each should
intensify his zeal for the preservation of that Faith shown by Dante
pre-eminently as support of learning and the arts. For We admire in him not
only supreme height of genius but also the immensity of the subject which holy
religion put to his hand. If his genius was refined by meditation and long
study of the great classics it was tempered even more gloriously, as We have
said, by the writings of the Doctors and the Fathers which gave him the wings
on which to rise to a higher atmosphere than that of restricted nature. And
thus it comes that, though he is separated from us by centuries, he has still
the freshness of a poet of our times: certainly more modern than some of those
of recent days who have exhumed the Paganism banished forever by Christ's
triumph on the Cross. There breathes in Alighieri the piety that we too feel;
the Faith has the same meaning for us; it is covered with the same veil,
"the truth given to us from on high, by which we are lifted so high."
That is his great glory, to be the Christian poet, to have sung with Divine
accents those Christian ideals which he so passionately loved in all the
splendour of their beauty, feeling them intimately and making them his life.
Such as dare to deny to Dante this award and reduce all the religious content
of the Divina Commedia to a vague ideology without basis of truth fail to see
the real characteristic of the poet, the foundation of all his other merits.
10. If then Dante owes so great part of his fame
and greatness to the Catholic Faith, let that one example, to say nothing of
others, suffice to show the falseness of the assertion that obedience of mind
and heart to God is a hindrance to genius, whereas indeed it incites and
elevates it. Let it show also the harm done to the cause of learning and
civilization by such as desire to banish all idea of religion from public
instruction. Deplorable indeed is the system prevalent today of educating young
students as if God did not exist and without the least reference to the supernatural.
In some places the "sacred poem" is not kept outside the schools, is
indeed numbered among the books to be studied specially; but it does not bring
to the young students that "vital nourishment" which it should do
because through the principle of the "lay school" they are not
disposed towards the truths of the Faith as they should be. Heaven grant that
this may be the fruit of the Dante Centenary: that wherever literary
instruction is given the great poet may be held in due honour and that he himself
may be for the pupils the teacher of Christian doctrine, he whose one purpose
in his poem was "to raise mortals from the state of misery," that is
from the state of sin, "and lead them to the state of happiness,"
that is of divine grace (Epist. III, para. 15).
11. And you, beloved children, whose lot it is
to promote learning under the magisterium of the Church, continue as you are
doing to love and tend the noble poet whom We do not hesitate to call the most
eloquent singer of the Christian idea. The more profit you draw from study of
him the higher will be your culture, irradiated by the splendours of truth, and
the stronger and more spontaneous your devotion to the Catholic Faith.
As pledge of celestial favours and witness of
Our paternal benevolence we impart to you, beloved children, with all Our
heart, the Apostolic benediction.
Given at Rome at St. Peter's, April 30, 1921, the seventh year of Our Pontificate.
Thursday, April 29, 2021
April 29, 1921. "16 Raiding Villistas Not Guilty"
News hit in Cheyenne that a jury in Deming had acquitted some accused of crimes during the Columbus raid. As noted yesterday, this wasn't the first trial, and in fact this one was remarkably late. Indeed, so late that a person really has to wonder about the justice involved in holding prisoners for six years before going to trial. And we learn from this article that these sixteen men had been tried and convicted previously, and then pardoned, and the rearrested on new charges. A pretty questionable set of events.
It was news in other venues as well.
The long delay may have worked in these prisoners favor as well as obviously evolving views on their role in the raid. Those tried rapidly were tried in the heat of the immediate events, which as we know included these men, received much less favorable results.
President Harding had spoken the day prior and that was front page news everywhere, including on the USS Arizona.