Friday, October 30, 2020

Pandemic, Part 3.


July 25, 2020

And on to part 3 of our Pandemic series.  Perhaps its surprising that there aren't more.

At this point, as we post this new chapter, it's really hard to tell where this is all going.  Careful observers have the feeling that we may be headed back into quarantines, and in some states we have, but nobody can really tell for sure just now.  There's an eerie feeling about all of it, with the unknown being a big part of that.

________________________________________________________________________________

July 27, 2020

A new model suggest that Coronavirus deaths could be cut by 2/3s if people universally wore masks.

COVID 19 is now in North Korea.  Interestingly early information suggests that it may have entered the country by way of a defector to South Korea who recently returned to North Korea.  The country has entered a state of emergency.

_________________________________________________________________________________

July 29, 2020

Italy, whose infection rate is now way down, extended its Coronavirus Emergency yesterday.

The World Health Organization stated yesterday that rather than a spring wave and a fall wave, the disease was likely to have one big wave which we are still in.

U.S. infection rates continue to be at record or near record rates.

A major promising vaccine has gone into a large trial.

Wyoming extended its existing disease orders.  In doing so the Governor urged wearing masks, stating that people who wanted the economy to fail should refuse to do so.  On the same day, Wyoming had a record number of reported new cases.

A pending bill in Congress on relief for the pandemic included $8B for military weapons.  Both major recent relief packages have featured favored policies or, in this case material, depending upon the party.

_________________________________________________________________________________

July 30, 2020

Michigan has imposed restrictions in the form of closing bars and limiting indoor gatherings to ten people.

The Speaker of the House has mandated masks in the US House of Representatives.

_________________________________________________________________________________

July 31, 2020

Jury trials were announced as resuming next week in Wyoming.

Casper College announced that it would have all live classes for the fall, but mask wearing would be mandatory.

_________________________________________________________________________________

August 4, 2020

The Laramie Brewfest is the latest casualty of the pandemic, having just been cancelled.

The huge motorcycle rally in Sturgis, South Dakota, is not however. While it expects to draw 250,000 attendees, and while the local community wished for it to be cancelled this year, it's going forward for its 75th anniversary.

As progress occurs on a vaccine, experts are warning that the pandemic will continue to be with us for months, if not years, and that things will not immediately return to normal.

_________________________________________________________________________________

August 5, 2020

August 5

On the same day, the Goshen County Commissioners passed a resolution calling the state's Coronavirus restrictions as "overblown".

Mississippi mandated masks at public gatherings and schools.

Canadian pastor David Lah was arrested for defying a large gathering prohibition in Myanmar. 
_________________________________________________________________________________

August 7, 2020

Schools on the Wind River Indian Reservation are starting this school year off with virtual learning and have postponed school sports.

_________________________________________________________________________________

August 9, 2020

Yesterday the President issued a series of executive orders that are aimed at economic relief due to the recession caused by COVID 19.  This came after negotiations in Congress failed to yield a deal on the competing provisions aimed at the same topic.

The legality of this move is very questionable and undoubtedly will be challenged in court.

_________________________________________________________________________________

August 11, 2020

The Mountain West Athletic Conference, which includes the University of Wyoming, cancelled football for the fall.

I don't really follow sports, but it's my understanding that this is also true of other fall sports this year.

_________________________________________________________________________________

August 12, 2020

Trini Lopez, folk singer and actor of the 1960s and 1970s, died at age 83 of the disease.

_________________________________________________________________________________

August 18, 2020

Wuhan China, where the disease first broke out, hosted a huge party yesterday.

_________________________________________________________________________________

August 21, 2020

Cineplex theaters in Canada are reopening nationwide.

The first reports of infections of SARS-CoV-2 stemming from attendance at the Sturgis motorcycle rally are coming in, all attributable so far to attendance at a large party.

Delta Airlines has banned retired Navy Seal Robert O'Neill from its flights.  O'Neill photographed himself not wearing a mask on a Delta flight, with a comment about himself, and an older man wearing a mask and a Marine Corps hat in the background.

_________________________________________________________________________________

August 24, 2020

Kentucky Fried Chicken suspended the use of its "finger licking good" slogan for the duration of the pandemic.

___________________________________________________________________________________

August 25, 2020

The University of Hong Kong has identified a man who has had COVID-19 twice, neither time seriously.  His infections were with two different strains over time.  This is significant in that it demonstrates that having had one strain doesn't prevent you from getting infected with another, but how you manifest it the second time isn't clear. The individual in question was asymptomatic the second time.

August 25, 2020, part two

And now two more individuals, both in the Netherlands, have exhibited the same thing.

It's worth remembering that some have theorized that the 1918 Flu it the world in two waves and then dissipated as it continued to evolve.  That's not proven, it's merely a theory, but it does suggest that we may be looking at a more complicated scenario than we were hoping for.

Additionally, it may mean that COVID-19 behaves much like the common cold, to which it is closely related, and it will mutate itself out of our being able to be absolutely immune to it. That doesn't mean that a type of immunity won't develop, but it'll be sort of a weak one leaving us still vulnerable to catching it, but our bodies will be able to handle it relatively quickly, much like colds.  If that's the case, it'll be around for years and years.

__________________________________________________________________________________

August 26, 2020

New infection rates in the United States have fallen 20% since the beginning of the month.

High school athletics locally have been restricted to 1,000 viewers.

__________________________________________________________________________________

August 27, 2020

Public Health Orders Extended Without Changes

 

CHEYENNE, Wyo. –  An extension to Wyoming’s current public health orders released today by the Wyoming Department of Health contain no changes.

The orders, which remain in effect through September 15, continue to allow outdoor gatherings of no more than 50% of venue capacity, with a maximum of 1,000 people as long as social distancing and increased sanitization measures are in place. Indoor gatherings in a confined space remain limited to 50 persons without restrictions and 250 persons if social distancing and sanitization measures are incorporated.

The public health restrictions that apply to restaurants, bars, gyms, performance spaces and personal care services also remain unchanged, as does a requirement that students in schools wear face coverings in situations where 6 feet of separation cannot be maintained. Specific exemptions are listed in the orders.

Over the past 14 days, Wyoming has averaged 35 lab-confirmed cases of COVID-19 per day, compared to an average of 27 cases per day for the period of July 30-August 12. More than 104,000 tests have been completed by the Wyoming Public Health Laboratory and private reference laboratories as of August 27.

The Wyoming Department of Health and Governor Gordon continue to strongly recommend the use of face coverings in public settings where it is not possible or reasonable to stay physically apart. On Wyoming’s COVID-19 dashboard the categories of number of new cases and new hospitalizations continue to be rated, “Concerning.”

As of August 27, Wyoming has recorded 3,166 lab-confirmed positive cases of COVID-19, 556 probable cases and 37 deaths.

The updated orders are attached and can be found online at https://covid19.wyo.gov/governors-orders

-END-

__________________________________________________________________________________

September 4, 2020

Brazil has now had 4,000,000 cases of the disease.

Parties at the University of Wyoming have resulted in a spike of infections which in turn are delaying the reopening of in person classes at the university.  Classes are presently being conducted remotely.

290 cases of the disease have been attributed to the motorcycle rally in Sturgis, South Dakota.

__________________________________________________________________________________

September 9, 2020

AstraZeneca Oxford halted its vaccine trial due to one of the subjects having a severe reaction.  In fairness, it is not known if the reaction was to the vaccine.

A report claims that the Sturgis motorcycle rally can be traced to 250,000 new infections, although it is disputed.

__________________________________________________________________________________

September 10, 2020

The British government is hoping for mass testing of vaccinations in the UK by the Spring.

US deaths from COVID-19 are now at approximately 190,000.  Iowa and South Dakota have emerged as hot spots.  South Dakota was otherwise in the news for using CARES funds for tourism advertising.

Global deaths are reported as having reached 900,000, although the accuracy of those figures could be questioned  India is experiencing a surge of cases.

Indiana's Bradley University declared a complete student quarantine.

___________________________________________________________________________________

September 12, 2020

Readers of the Star Tribune today will be treated to the oddity of a headline noting that UW has decided to resume in person classes next week and an editorial from a disgruntled transfer student who is upset that UW hasn't resumed in person classes.

___________________________________________________________________________________

September 15, 2020

The University of Wyoming announced it was resuming in person classes.

___________________________________________________________________________________

September 17, 2020

The Big 10 has decided it will host a football season this year.

The Southern hemisphere is reporting record low flu cases this year as a byproduct of the Coronavirus lockdowns.

__________________________________________________________________________________

September 18, 2020

Van Morrison, the Northern Ireland born British singer, is releasing an album of protest songs related to the Coronavirus pandemic. Specifically, it protests the British government's lockdown policies.

In India the pandemic is now being associated with a rise in child marriages and child labor in that country.

__________________________________________________________________________________

September 19, 2020

Casper College is testing all of its dorm residents due to positive testing in some athletes.

The College of Law is going on a temporary shut down/remote learning period due to six of its students coming down with the virus.

Utah, which never really imposed any measures, is now considering doing so due to an increase in infections following the opening of the schools.

Coreleone Sicily went into a limited lockdown following a spat of infections following a wedding.
__________________________________________________________________________________

September 20, 2020

Studies have shown that among the "severe" risks for COVID 19, i.e., those conditions that create a severe risk for those who acquire COVID 19, is obesity.

Upwards of 40% of Americans are regarded as obese and there's no doubt that Americans carry, even in this health conscious age, considerably more weight than they did even a couple of decades ago.  The story has become oddly controversial as at the same time that this has occurred, and more Americans have acquired extra pounds, both "fat shaming" and a movement to simply accept overweight as normal has occurred, and both have oddly found voice in the fashion industry.  As examples, Kate Upton, who is a very tall and well endowed model, was asked at one point to lose weight, which she refused to do (she's tall. . . and well endowed, not overweight), whereas just a couple of years later fashion models who are clearly morbidly obese hit the scene. A movement to stop the shaming commenced with fair success, which is a good development in the context that shaming is brutal and brutally juvenile, but that has morphed a bit into a movement ignoring the risks of the condition.

All the while Americans continue to be prime consumers of diet fads.  Indeed, one of my email address is bombarded constantly with spam about ice cream and the like you can eat and supposedly grown thin with.

Anyhow, the health dangers of being overweight are very well known in general, but the degree to which it impacts all sorts of other conditions is now well understood.  A World War Two vintage medical study, for example, found underweight wounded German POWs recovered from their wounds quicker than American soldiers.  Something to do with weight, and that during an era when carrying a little extra weight was thought to be a good thing as a hinge against disease.  

And now it appears that obesity is one of the conditions that puts a person at a higher risk for a COVID 19 infection being severe.

__________________________________________________________________________________

September 24, 2020

In a bizarre story a South Korean fisheries official who as attempting to defect to North Korea (why on Earth would anyone do that?) was shot and killed by North Korean troops who subsequently burned his body to prevent the spread of the virus.

Israel is closing its open air markets and all non essential businesses in order to address the second wave of infections in that country.

Belgium is suspending the mandatory wearing of face masks.

The Governor of Missouri and his wife have tested positive for the disease.

Justin Trudeau has stated that Canada has entered the second wave of infections.

Recent infection reports in Wyoming are at a record high.

The University of Wyoming's forty member cheer squad is in isolation following three of its members coming down with COVID 19.
_________________________________________________________________________________

September 25, 2020

The Mountain West Athletic Division will be playing football this year, according to an announcement made yesterday.

__________________________________________________________________________________

September 26, 2020

Casper College put its residence hall students on quarantine due to an infection outbreak among students living in them.

UW is moving to its third phase of its COVID plan with a resumption of many in person classes.  

At the same time, a UW upperclassmen published an op ed in the Tribune today complaining about the slowness to open up there and noting that an associate professor at the College of Health had participated in recent protests in Laramie, an obvious public gathering.

_________________________________________________________________________________

September 29, 2020

The global death toll of the virus is now 1,000,000, of which 200,000 are Americans.

The World Health Organization marked the number with noted sadness, but added this comment:
The one positive thing about this virus is it is suppressable, it is not the flu.
An epidemiologist would probably be required to really explain what that meant.

Florida has removed its pandemic rules for restaurants.
___________________________________________________________________________________

October 1, 2020

A physician in Jackson is participating in a vaccine trial, and hence that means Teton County residents can be part of that.

In a controversial move that is being contested by the city, Spain has ordered Madrid locked down.

A gene associated with severe cases of the Coronavirus has been found to be one of the ones inherited from Neanderthals.  50% of South Asians carry the gene and 16% of Europeans, which is interesting in part because I was unaware that any human population other than Europeans carried Neanderthal genes until just recently.

__________________________________________________________________________________

October 2, 2020

President Trump and Melania Trump have tested positive for COVID 19.  

This followed news that the President's close advisor, Hope Nicks, had tested positive for the disease.  The President and First Lady were accordingly tested and found to be infected.  This followed with one of the Presidents archetypal tweets, which stated:

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Tonight,
@FLOTUS
and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER!

Wyoming has over 1,000 active cases for the first time, and with 27 hospitalizations, it also has a record number in the hospital.

Mississippi has lifted its mask mandate.

Movie theaters in India will reopen on October 15.

__________________________________________________________________________________

October 3, 2020

President Trump was hospitalized in Walter Reed hospital where he is undergoing an experimental treatment for the virus.

Republican members of Congress, including some on the Judiciary Committee, and members of the White House Press Corps, are now also reporting positive with the disease.

Eleven University of Wyoming freshman football players have tested positive.
__________________________________________________________________________________

October 5, 2020

New York City is closing some schools and bars in certain areas of the city that have been experiencing an increased number of infections.

Paris has closed its bars.

___________________________________________________________________________________

October 6, 2020

Governor Gordon held a press conference yesterday, Monday October 5, on the increase of COVID 19 cases in the state.  He declared that things were  headed in "the wrong direction".  The National Guard has been partially activated to participate in contact tracing efforts.

Free home tests for the disease will soon be available in Wyoming.

President Trump returned to the White House.

Masks are now mandatory in the Bundestag.

The World Health Organization estimates that 10% of the world's population has been infected with COVID 19 during the pandemic. Herd immunity, fwiw, would require between 60% to 80%.

__________________________________________________________________________________

October 7, 2020

Anthony Fauci, in an address to American University, warned that there could be 300,000 to 400,000 deaths due to the pandemic if precautions are not enacted.  The University of Washington has already issued a prognostication that deaths could reach 300,000 by December 1.

Deaths are already as follows according to the CDC:

Updated October 7, 2020
While the CDC has the figures at 198,809, its generally accepted that the totals are over 200,000 for COVID 19.  The interesting aspect of these figures, which I haven't seen actually discussed, is the added the added element of influenza.

Given the way this generally works, and the current rate of infection, while it is just my guess, I'd find it difficult to believe that the death toll won't reach 300,000, and I'll decline from making predictions after that.  This isn't a comment on anything other than the attack rate of the disease and what we currently seeing going on, with increases in many parts of the United States and around the globe.

FWIW, India now has a death toll of 100,000.
__________________________________________________________________________________

October 8, 2020

Italy has ordered that face masks be worn outdoors.

Hasidic Orthodox Jews protested in Brooklyn over new restrictions in parts of that city which restrict, among other things, the number of people that can be in houses of worship.

Brazil has surpassed 5,000,000 cases of the disease.

___________________________________________________________________________________

October 10, 2020

The White House organization making recommendations on the virus recommended mask be worn in several Wyoming counties in September but not in October according to a report in the Tribune.  The report goes to the Governor whose recommendations were not as extensive as those recommended by the report.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi questioned certifying a British vaccine which has been certified, stating her concern that British standards for certification may be lower than American ones.

The US government has ordered 1,000,000+ of a Lilly COVID 19 antibody treatment and expects delivery prior to 2021.

India's infection rate is set to outpace the total number of US cases. 

__________________________________________________________________________________

October 13, 2020

An American in his 20s is the first confirmed case in the US of a person getting COVID 19 twice.  In that instance, the second infection was determined to be a slightly different strain and was the more serious of the two infections.

Necessarily this complicates coming up with an effective vaccine and it also suggest that the disease is evolving.

The Michigan Supreme Court struck down that state's governor's emergency executive orders.
__________________________________________________________________________________

October 15, 2020

Europe is now reporting twice the daily infection rate that the United States is, which of course isn't a completely fair comparison in that Europe is a continent, not a country.

France has imposed a night time curfew on major cities. 

London will return to a strict lockdown this weekend.  Such restrictions have been very widely ignored in London recently.

Casper's Wyoming Medical Center opened a new wing to handle a surge in cases.  At a press conference it presented dire warnings and urged individuals to observe strict mask wearing protocols.
__________________________________________________________________________________

October 16, 2020

Seven cases were reported in one of the University of Wyoming sororities.

A chief Irish health minister stated that the disease is "not in control" in that country.  The press has been clamoring for Ireland to go to Level 4 or 5, the two highest states of response in Ireland, but the Irish PM has resisted and indicates that he won't do so unless there's an exist strategy such as was the case for Germany.

___________________________________________________________________________________

October 17, 2020

Wyomingites going to Connecticut, Kentucky, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island or Washington D.C. must quarantine for fourteen days upon arrival in those locations.

Wyoming hit an all time high infection number yesterday.

__________________________________________________________________________________

October 23, 2020

Casper College is going to mostly online classes following its fall break.

Wyoming has now had 10,000 confirmed cases, a large number but far less than the suspected national infection rate, which would require five times that number.  Having said that, there may well have been many undetected infections.

There's some current speculation on the regional infection rate and its relationship to the recent Sturgis motorcycle rally, although the upswing in cases in Wyoming most likely cannot be fairly attributed to that but to other factors.

___________________________________________________________________________________

October 27, 2020

Laramie County is getting ready to impose an indoor public mask requirement.

The Tribune has closed its lobby.
___________________________________________________________________________________

October 30, 2020

Governor Gordon, Department of Health Take Actions to Address Statewide COVID-19 Surge

 

CHEYENNE, Wyo. – With the alarming rise in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations around the state, Governor Mark Gordon and the Wyoming Department of Health (WDH) are stepping up their efforts to protect vulnerable populations, enhance contact tracing efforts and expand testing availability to all residents. 

Governor Gordon is also concerned that Wyoming’s economy will be affected by this rise in cases. While the state remains open, the impacts of the surge in cases affect all Wyomingites. Wyoming has averaged more than 200 new cases of COVID-19 per day over the past 14 days, and more than 100 Wyomingites with the virus are hospitalized around the state as of October 30.

“This surge in cases in our communities is directly impacting Wyoming’s healthcare system, our businesses and industries, and straining our healthcare workforce,” Governor Gordon said. “This is the time to recognize that our actions impact others, their lives and livelihoods. All of us have a role to play in ensuring that our hospitals can continue to care for all patients, not just those suffering from COVID-19.”

To protect vulnerable citizens, Wyoming continues to provide enhanced testing at nursing homes and assisted living facilities, including testing all residents and staff at facilities where COVID-19 outbreaks or clusters have been detected. At other facilities that are not experiencing outbreaks the state continues its surveillance testing program, where a percentage of residents are tested regularly. 

WDH is supplementing its contact tracing efforts by bringing on a Wyoming-based company, Waller Hall Research, to provide assistance. The Wyoming National Guard will step down its help with contact tracing support next week. Contact tracing is one of the state’s most effective strategies in isolating the virus and preventing its spread.

“I want to thank our citizen soldiers for being ready and willing to serve their communities when counties requested assistance with this vital service,” the Governor said. 

The state is supporting health facilities, correctional facilities, counties, and other entities through testing available at the Wyoming Public Health Laboratory and through the 175,000 tests Wyoming purchased with CARES Act funds. Additional rapid testing utilizing the limited number of BinaxNOW platforms provided by the federal government is also being integrated into the state’s strategy.

A free, at-home saliva testing program remains available to residents, and WDH is launching a program to support businesses and employers across the state with free COVID-19 testing as well. By making regular and frequent surveillance testing available, Wyoming businesses will have an additional way to keep their staff and their customers as safe as possible, preventing future impacts to their operations due to illness. Wyoming’s school surveillance testing program is underway, with 27 districts currently participating. 

Wyoming is also in the process of exploring a program that would offer incentives to businesses that voluntarily make changes to operations that enhance the safety of employees, customers, and the general public. 

Wyoming’s public health orders have been extended an additional two weeks through November 15. The orders are attached and can be found on the state’s COVID-19 website

--END--

 

Order2_FifteenthContinuation_Oct302020.pdf

___________________________________________________________________________________


Pandemic, Part Two


The Election Season's Agrarian Lament


What greater or more wonderful spectacle can there be, after all, or when is human reason more able after a fashion to converse with “The Nature of Things,” than when after seeds have been sown, cuttings potted, shrubs planted out, graftings made, each root and seed is questioned, so to say, on what its inner vita force can or cannot do, what helps and what hinders it, what is the range of the inner, invisible power of its own numerical formula, what that of the care bestowed on it from outside? 

St Augustine.

"A Member of the Family".  English idealized agrarian panting.  While highly idealized to be sure, the painting does hit upon actual features of the agricultural and agrarian family.  Fresh food, a connection with animals, and a close working family.

This thread goes back to the primary season.  It has lingered there since long before Joe Biden was nominated on the Democratic ticket.  A tour through The Front Porch Republic brought it back into mind.  More specifically, it was last worked on, on November 26, 2019. . . nearly a year ago.  For that reason, even though it will read extremely oddly, we're breaking it into two parts.

Nebraska homestead, 1880s.

One thing watching the (then) recent Democratic debates brings home is that there's no home for rural voters or voters of an agrarian mindset in the Democratic Party.


Which is not to say there's one in the GOP either.


Only one candidate in the recent debates mentioned rural concerns at all, Amy Klobuchar, and only in the context of her having carried rural districts in elections. But then Klobuchar is technically a member of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer Labor Party, and Minnesota, long time home to a type of liberalism that it is, is also heavily rural in quite a few areas.  It's an odd state in that way, although that feature does repeat in other localities.


Now, in fairness, it wouldn't be true to suggest that the concerns of rural voters have really been in the forefront of national politics for a very long time.  Arguably the last time they really were was during Franklin Roosevelt's administration, at which time a larger percentage of the country's population lived in rural areas and there was a gigantic rural (and urban) crisis going on.  FDR's actions were very mixed in terms of what they achieved, however.  Probably the biggest thing he did that really helped was to cause the end of homesteading, which was a good thing in that it preserved ranch and farm viability.



The first decade of the Cold War did see some attention to farm matters as agriculture was conscripted into the struggle against Communism, but the result wasn't really good long term. All of the administrations of the first fifteen or so years of the Cold War urged planting fence to fence, which had the ancillary result of really wiping out the remaining agrarian nature of American farming.  Since that time there's been farm policies focused on this or that, but they're never really taken on the character of, let's say, French farm policy which is designed specifically to preserve the rural population for cultural reasons. 


The basic American view has become pretty clear over the last decade or so, and in both parties. Everyone is headed towards a big city cubicle and big city career and they'll like it as they must.


Except many won't.

Indeed, if statistics are paid attention too, most won't.

Statistics about American workers show that nearly all of the assumptions about work made in both parties are made on a bunch of erroneous assumptions.  Politicians like to talk about "fulfilling careers" and the like, but that's mostly a bunch of baloney unsupported by statistics.  By and large Americans in all demographics don't like their careers very much.  



What the modern economy has become very good at is generating income in a corporate setting, and that has indeed raised the standard of living globally.  It can be argued, however, that at this point that cycle has passed and the type of capitalistic economy we have has passed a threshold where this is no longer true, and that its presently consuming occupations at the middle class level while distributing income to fewer and fewer at greater and greater levels. This can of course be debated.




And it's no wonder.  American work is deeply anti natural.  Indeed, modern work is.  Truth be known, except for hopeless weirdos, nobody really figures when they're young that they want to work in some esoteric branch of engineering, computing,or  accounting, etc.  People might later say "I always", but they never did, except for a tiny few, who are genuinely often odd and often not all that good at what they claim that they always wanted to do.  That super accountant, in other words, or great engineer, probably came around to that through a lot of factors, including limited options, societal force and the modern worship of money that's imposed upon all.



Rather, people's attentions remain deeply focused, if now hopelessly debased in their focus in many instances, on what they always were.  People want to be outdoors. They want to engage in natural activities like hunting, fishing, and raising their own food. 

Thomas Jefferson, the last President who was deeply agrarian in thought.  The basis of the Louisiana Purchase was, in part, to secure lands for future agrarians, the only way that Jefferson thought the republic would remain one.

And then, just as this post was first being worked on, came the outbreak of a deadly new virus in Wuhan China, COVID 19.


If anything, that outbreak out to be telling us that the densely packed urban blights that we've created are not only deeply unsatisfying to people, and an economy based on the false notion that, as Col. Saito stated in Bridge On The River Kwai, that you can "be happy in your work", if your work is just being a drone in a cubicle, is false.  And indeed a lot of people did take that view. This past year, following the outbreak, has seen a record number of people out in the sticks.  It also saw a record number of people, at least for awhile, out of work.

Female pheasant hunter, Colorado, 1960s.

So why does this remain unaddressed?  As people like Robert Reich wring their hands in agony over rural states having disproportionate representation in the Senate, and people like Kamala Harris claim false connections with deeply distressed urban populations that they share no real connection with, and all over the country we continue to allow agricultural land to be converted into playground lands rather than lands sustaining agricultural families, maybe a policy to allow a return to the real, which would be the rural, is in order?


There's always all sorts of talk during an election season about "repairing the nation's infrastructure", and other stuff that nobody ever really intends to do.  In a little more than a few days from now there's highly likely to be an oval office changing of the guard effected, and maybe a Senatorial one.  President Trump and the GOP can claim some credit for passing statutes that guard wildlands and favor hunters, although at least one of those things is predictably tied up in court already (and likely the D. C. Circuit, with its absurdly broad jurisdiction), but nobody is going to interrupt conversations about bridges and highways with fields and farms.  Pretty soon, they'll forget the conversations about bridges and highways.

Somebody should try to bring up the conversation about farms and fields.



Douthat and the deeply conservative, but anti Trump, Republicans

Ross Douthat, the conservative New York Times columnist that people either love, hate, love to hate, or hate to love, has written an October 24 column that neatly sums up what a lot of people are struggling with in conservative camps.  Written as semi self satire, the article approach the Trump candidacy from the position of a true, Ivy League, blue blood, conservative who really doesn't support Trump, never has, but who is tortured by the fact that if you set the man aside from his demeanor, there really are reasons for conservatives to support the President's campaign for reelection.* The question is if they outweigh the reasons they perceive for not doing so.

Presented as a debate with his internal muse, Douthat looks fairly at those reasons.  His article is definitely worth reading.  Subtitled "A voice in my head makes the case to re-reelect the president", he does just that, while concluding that he's not voting for Trump.

Douthat puts those reasons as follows, starting off amusing ly this way:

Last Sunday this section was turned over to essays making the case against the re-election of Donald Trump. I read all of the pieces, and found more than a few points with which I disagreed. But my commitment to contrarianism only goes so far: Fundamentally I agree with my colleagues that Trump should not be …

Heyyyyyy — you aren’t even going to let me make a case here?

Excuse me?

Douthat goes on to note, in much greater detail than I'll summarize them here, the Presidents accomplishments, from a conservative position. Those are:

1.  He cut immigration rates.

2.  He created a looser monetary policy.

3.  No new wars.

4.  The beginning of a withdrawal from Afghanistan.

5.  Supreme Court appointments.

Douthat acknowledged all of these things in varying degrees, but still comes out against Trump in the end for reasons he sets out.  As noted,  it's well worth reading.

I don't know who Douthat is voting for, as I don't read his column regularly.  As The New York Times has a paywall, and as I choose not to be a subscriber of the Grey Lady, I couldn't, although I would, if I could.  I briefly subscribed to the NYT podcast The Argument, of which he's a feature, but as I'm over subscribed on podcasts, I dropped back off.  Off hand, I think he's said some nice things about the American Solidarity Party, which has received some conservative anti Trump endorsements this year. Rod Dreher, for example, has been saying nice things about them.  The ASP provides a protest refuge for conservatives as its opposed to abortion, but if it were doing better in the polls it wouldn't receive much conservative support, as it also has what is basically an open door immigration policy.  Douthat has written a book with another conservative commentator about the future of conservatism, which he sees going in another direction in the future, but I haven't read it (his muse torments him in the article for its low readership, which is probably self deprecating as it is, in fact, highly regarded).   

Douthat, now 40 years old, stands as good of chance as being the next William F. Buckley as anyone. 

Basically, Douthat's position is that Trump's failings as a President and as a human being outweigh his plusses, even when he acknowledges them.  But this does point out, as noted, the problems that  true conservatives presently have in disregarding Trump too freely.

Trump has cut immigration rates which some on the non political left argue remains at an environmentally destructive rate and many on the non political left argue remains at an economically destructive rate for the country.  This is something that the overwhelming majority of Americans support addressing, but the Democrats, naively believing that all immigrants are future Democratic voters, which is true in the near term, definitely oppose. Ironically, as most immigrants also come from more traditional cultures they're helping to fuel a turn towards cultural conservatism that Democrats seem to fail to be unable to recognize, and when they gain sufficient economic strength, they turn away from Democrats, something that is a pretty clear trend, but oddly unrecognized. Be that as it may, the present population of the country really can't harmlessly endure the current ongoing immigration rate, which isn't a left right matter, but an economic and environmental one.

I don't grasp anything about monetary policy but Douthat does note that the economy was doing well before the virus and that no one President or person can be blamed for the pandemic, although Douthat condemns Trump's handling of the pandemic. As I don't know much about monetary policy, and tend towards economic views that don't fit the right tor the left well, I'll just leave that there.

Voters in 2016 did want out of the ongoing wars and didn't want to get into new ones, and like it or not, Trump has lived up to that.  President Obama, on the other hand, very much did not.  Take that for what its worth.  Personally, my view is that we shouldn't leave Afghanistan until we've won, which nobody ever said was going to be easy, and which Donald Rumsfeld should receive the blame for poor planning on.

Finally, the liberal direction of the Court had gone on to various degrees since the 1960s and it really did need to be addressed.  Over the past 50 years the Court's been converted from a real appellate court to a societal arbiter of supreme nature, which has reduced respect for the Court.  Trump's picks, which were really Mitch McConnell's filtered through the Federalist Society, has gone a long ways towards addressing that.  Joe Biden promises to reform the Court, but any reforms that the Democrats are likely to support are likely to disastrous.  The Court needs reformation (age limits and a reduction in size would be a good start), but the type we're going to be offered isn't going to help much if anything, and likely won't get through for that matter.

So what are conservatives to do? Basically, Douthat argues that Trump is so indecent he must be let go.  

That argument has been made before, but not really as cogently as Douthat makes it.  Other conservatives have made the indecent argument, and tied it to other things, but not in a synthesized overall argument like the youngish columnist from the Times.  Douthat argues that Trump's behavior is so corrosive that long term gains for conservatives will be overshadowed by a society wide taint that will be overall deterimentative for years to come.

Indeed, Douthat is already on record to some degree that this is the case, having been the author along with another conservative of a book on the future of the GOP, which they argue must be rebuilt.  In his column, while acknowledging real conservative gains over the past four years (some of which, the Court in particular, are very real, even unprecedented gains).

Here we should accordingly turn to history, I suppose, and see if it supports his argument.  The results are mixed, but there is reason to credit him.

Perhaps the most dramatic, and disturbing, examples are those of the European right wing, non fascist, political parties that existed prior to World War Two.  There were quite a few.

If we can characterize those parties, which were all national, not pan European, in character, they were all deeply conservative, tended to be monarchical in sympathies, and tended to support traditional institutions in their countries even if individual leaders of those parties tended to be poor examples of adherence to them in some occasions.  They were also quasi populist in nature, and often tended to hold up agrarians as examples of national character even while, oddly enough, they were not agrarian parties.  Indeed, at the time Europe had a lot of national agrarian parties that were parties of the left in some significant ways, and not in others, but which were unique unto themselves.  Those parties outlasted most of the pre war European conservative parties, but not all of them.

The reaction of these parties varied during the European crisis.  Some of them, like Fianna Fail, the Irish nationalist party, sailed right through period without impact, but also without becoming entangled in compromise with other forces.**

Spain and France, however, give us much different examples.  In France there existed deeply right wing political parties prior to World War Two. Those parties tended to favor monarchy and tended to be anti democratic, neither of which is the case for any branch of American conservatism.  They were not fascist parties, however.  During World War Two they came to power in the Vichy regime and ran it.  Following the war, while there was a French right, it was forever tainted by its compromise during World War Two and its never really overcome it.  Strongly right wing populist movements exist in France today, but when they achieve much notoriety they begin to get associated with their pre war predecessors to their detriment.  To at least some degree, that's kept them from returning to power.

This is also true of Spain, where right wing parties were allied with Franco throughout his long dictatorship. That fact has kept them essentially out of power, no matter what their overall views may be, since Franco's fall. Right wing Spanish political parties still exist, but they're marginalized as a result of their Francoist past.

In Germany, of course, World War Two had a permanent detrimental impact on the pre war right wing parties.  Many just died due to their cooperation with the Nazis during Hitler's rise to power.  Perhaps the fact that Hitler put an end to rival parties so quickly after he became Chancellor kept conservative German parties from dying altogether, and in fact conservative German politicians who had escaped Nazi Germany and spent Hitler's time in power in exile formed the government from May 1949, when the Federal Republic of Germany was formed, until 1968 when they lost power in that fateful year.

The mess of Italian politics gives us, however, an example where seemingly nothing was changed by the war and what it meant.  Italy retains "neo fascist" political parties as well has heavily right wing parties, regional parties, and radial left wing parties.  None of them seem to be effective at anything.  A niece of Mussolini has been a fairly successful Italian politician in recent times in spite of being a fascist and a former pornographic actress.  So go figure.

Turning to the United States, perhaps a more analogous example can be found in the Democratic Party, ironically enough. The Democrats were the nation's conservative party during much of the 19th Century and it was the party of slavery and the South.  Its association with both heavily damaged it following the Civil War but it never ceased to exist.  It didn't even reform, and by the late 1870s, it was back as a fully functioning national party.  Reform to the Democratic Party didn't come until the 1890s, when it started, and it took until the Civil Rights Era and beyond, all the way until the 1980s, for Southern Democrats to no longer be associated with a sort of heavily tainted, populist, and racist, conservatism.

Before Republicans take too much comfort form that latter example, however, it must also be kept in mind that the early 19th Century saw the destruction of numerous American political parties, including those that had been very major parties, due to their inability to keep a cogent identifiable central position.  Parties like the Federalist and Whigs rose in power, had Presidents, and then collapsed virtually overnight.  That example is one that current Republicans have reason to be worried about, and some are.  Efforts to keep parties like the Whigs together after they lost a central theme were impossible, and new parties, including the Republican Party, spun out of their collapse.

So what does a person take from the examples of history?

Well, perhaps not surprisingly, association with a negative does impact a political party, but often only seemingly briefly, and sometimes not at all.  Given that, the GOP cannot be expected to evaporate, but suffer for an election term or two.  Probably less than predicted right now.  It'll reemerge different from what it presently is, but perhaps surprisingly less different than some would now predict.  

Deep traumas, however, are usually, but surprisingly not universally, game changers and some deeply held positions are permanently lost, or lost for a long time.  I.e., there aren't any serious German or French monarchist anymore, and there haven't been since 1945, but the Southern Democrats didn't reform for over a century.  Is Trump that deep of trauma? Right now, that would depend upon who you listen to, but history would suggest probably not.

Anyway we look at it, it's safe to assume that the GOP of 2022 isn't going to be the same as the GOP of 2020, or at least that's my prediction, anyhow.  My guess is that it will be younger, and much more philosophically conservative, and probably less populist.  It's leaders, and probably Douthat is in that category, will start to really emerge next year.  Time, of course, will tell.

*Douthat is a Harvard graduate.  His father is a New Haven, Connecticut lawyer and poet.  His mother is a writer. A maternal great grandfather was the Governor of Connecticut.

**Fianna Fail  had the advantage, in this regard of being in power in Ireland throughout this period.  

October 30, 1920. Drum Major, Imitating Mother, the Australian Communist Party, and Parking

 

On this day in 1920 the Saturday Evening Post's cover was graced by a J. C. Leyendecker illustration of a band major.

Usually scenes like this were topical, but this one was clearly not.  In October the only kids who would be wearing the old fashioned (dare we say it) "wife beater" type of t-shirt would have had to live in the deep South, as the cool weather would have set in everywhere else. And at this time of year, bands weren't marching.

Judge had a classic scene, now probably regarded as un-woke, of a little girl mimicking her elders conduct, something that still occurs, acknowledged by society or not.

Also on this day, the Australian Communist Party formed.

It's little remembered today, but the Australian Communist Party, which dissolved in 1991, was a powerful party in its day.  Some credit the Irish Australians and the Catholic Church, of which they were members of stemming it tide, although certainly that was only partially true, and while the party dissolved in 1991, lingering left wing resentment is credited by some with the charade of a trial delivered to Cardinal Pell which was later overturned, something that will stand with the Dred Scott decision in the United States as a shameful national blight on a nation's legal system.  The party went into a steep decline after the full horrors of Soviet Communism started to be revealed after World War Two, although strongly left wing sentiments in some Australian political parties remain.



Blog Mirror: Savory Sweet Venison Meatballs in an Apple Cider Cream Sauce

Savory Sweet Venison Meatballs in an Apple Cider Cream Sauce

Blog Mirror: USDA’s Cutting-Edge Methods Help Deliver a Victory Against Asian Giant Hornet

 USDA’s Cutting-Edge Methods Help Deliver a Victory Against Asian Giant Hornet

Wednesday, October 28, 2020

Mid Week At Work: Biological services supervisor retires after 28 years of state service to wildlife

 I don't usually do these in "real time", so to speak and more often than not they feature some occupation from the past, in keeping with the supposed focus of the blog.  But I just thought this was interesting:

Biological services supervisor retires after 28 years of state service to wildlife

A couple of random thoughts.

I thought this way of summing up the subject will miss about his job, by the subject, was a nice way to do it.

“Being back in the truck driving home talking on the radio with everyone — after working in the field from sunrise until dark.— that’s what I’ll miss the most,” Woolley said. “No one will understand that feeling unless you did it.”

I'll be that's right.

The other thing that struck me is that he's retiring after 28 years.  He started part time in 1992, as a graduate student, and went full time in 1996. So his retirement years include his part time service while still a graduate student.

If I use the same measure, I've been working at my current occupation for 31 years.  I never actually calculate it that way as lawyers have to be admitted to the bar to be lawyers, and looked at that way, I just went over 30 years a couple of months ago.

It's interesting in that 30 years in an occupation is regarded as unusual by some, usually people who aren't that far into a career.  I know lots of lawyers who have 40 years into careers, and have known those who had 50.  Indeed, lots of lawyers just don't retire and maybe, instead, slow down.

There's some open speculation as to why that is.  For one thing, state and Federal retirement works on the old fashioned pension model that's become increasingly rare in modern times as we evolved to a savings based retirement system.  Lots of people, even with good incomes, never feel secure in their savings and for good reason.  Beyond that, lots of people really don't make what people presume that they do.

Anyway you look at it the headline was a bit of a shock to me.  I'm not anywhere close to retirement and this fellow, who has to be at least three years  younger than men, has retired.

Maybe. We never really know what people actually do when they retire.  I've known one fellow whose tried to retire three times and never really managed it.  

And as somebody with livestock. . . well you never really retire.

Anyhow, it's a nice article.

Amy Coney Barrett as a Mirror

Judge Laurence Silberman, for whom Barrett first clerked after law school, swearing her in at her investiture for the Seventh Circuit.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett#/media/File:20180223_185543_NDD_5533.jpg  CC BY-SA 4.0view termsFile:20180223 185543 NDD 5533.jpg Created: 23 February 2018

Yesterday we published this item about long term demographic trends in the U.S.

The Conservative Tide?

Um, correction, we published those about long term demographic trends on Earth, and how that will, and already is, impacting culture..

Following that news, Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed to the United States Supreme Court.

This is interesting in the context of itself, as well as the context of what we were writing about.  Barrett is, in some ways, a mirror on where we are now, and where we're going.

She's also a mirror on how we view democracy itself, at an existential level.  Are we for it, or against it?

Barrett's nomination angered and upset the old order liberal establishment.  She appeared to be what liberals have really feared over the years but never had to really fully face, at least since the death of Scalia.  A legal genius who is a textualist.  And here, in a Twitter exchange between two U.S. Senators, who can see the upset distilled and refined.

First, Senator Ed Markey, a semi freshman Senator (he started finishing John Kerry's term in 2013 before being elected to his own first full term and had a long stint in Congress) from Massachusetts and then the reply from Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse.

Markey, who made it to Congress for his freshman at age 67 (he's now in his 70s) although he did have a prior term as a Congressman from Massachusetts from 1976 until 2013.

Ed Markey@SenMarkeyOriginalism is racist. Originalism is sexist. Originalism is homophobic. Originalism is just a fancy word for discrimination.1:22 PM · Oct 26, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
Sasse, on his second term and still in his forties.

Senator Ben Sasse@SenSasseReplying to u/SenSasseActually, “originalism” is another way of saying that texts and words have meaning. That's not to claim that all texts and words from 1789 were correct – but that when they need to be changed, they should be changed by elected legislators, not unelected judges.4:55 PM · Oct 26, 2020·Twitter Web App

First of all, it must be stated that Markey' statement is so blisteringly ignorant that it should disqualify him from voting for dog catcher.  This is dumb beyond belief.  It's not only partisan, it's just outright stupid.  The fact that Markey has a law degree from the Boston College of Law is proof, as if any is needed, that you really don't need to know anything about anything in order to graduate from law school.

You also apparently don't need to know the Constitution or care about the truth of it.  Markey has been in Congress since 2013

It also shows that the oath of office that Senators take is regarded as a complete joke by some. The oath states:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God. 

I know that it's hoping against hope, but there should be a point at which the violation of your oath of office has an implication, with that properly being that the Senate should refuse to continue to seat you.  You're an oath breaker in your office.  You should go. 

Sasse isn't a lawyer, and is a PhD, so there's apparently some hope for other disciplines yet remaining.

Of interest, Markey, who joined the National Guard while in college, which he says wasn't to avoid service in Vietnam, and who made it to Specialist E4 after five years of National Guard service, was born in 1946.  Sasse in 1972.  Markey is a reliably left wing politician who just made it to the US Senate, after a long career in the House. Sasse is a very independent Republican who is on his second term.*

In other words, here we see the prefect example of what we wrote about yesterday.  An aged, and now nearly irrelevant, East Coast Boomer politician is stating absolute idiocies about the Constitution, and being corrected by a post boomer respected, and more experienced at the Senatorial level, Mid American politician.

In the reaction to Barrett we're seeing a lot of this, although savvy politicians of all generations avoided it.  Long term political survivor, for example, Dianne Feinstein just flat out didn't go there, and for good reason.  She's taking a lot of whiny heat for her decision not to, but given her long history in politics, she's adept at reading the Washington tea leaves and avoided committing forced errors in the second Barrett confirmation she participated in.

The real complaint on the left, to the extent they've been able to express it, is expressed in terms of "she's going to take away our rights", ignoring the fact that it takes five Supreme Court justices to do anything and if Barrett is reliably a textualist there's only one other actually on the Court.  But beyond that, what the real fear is that the Justices will stop making stuff up and send things back to the states to be voted on.

That fear is based on something we all know to be true. The Constitution doesn't cover all that much.  If it isn't in there, it really is left up to the states.  Liberals fear that the American people simply aren't as liberal as they are.  So they don't want these things voted on.  Its not the Courts taking away their rights that they fear, but rather a declaration that they aren't rights and therefore they aren't protected by the Constitution, and are free for legislative address.  

Liberals have real reason to fear that, to be sure, because the evidence is pretty good a lot of state legislatures would in fact not recognize a lot of things that the Supreme Court has said are rights over the years.  But that's the thing about democracy.  People don't always see things the same way you do.

Indeed, they often don't.

Indeed, the recognition of this by humorist and social commentator Garrison Keillor, who is openly left wing also brought a firestorm of criticism from his own fellow travelers.  Keillor made a comment about some things just not worth ripping the country apart for anymore, and included abortion among them, and then was subject to aggressively negative comments.  Keillor's suggestion was that the country could tolerate the states deciding their own way.   That brought the classic argument used when somebody can't think of something to argue about from some on the left, which was to turn on accusations that Keillor acted inappropriately to women on his staff.**
Garrison Keillor was accused of bullying and humiliating women on his staff and no one should be shocked that he continues to be anti-women. . . 
Lyz Lenz, former columnist for the Cedar Rapids Gazette. 

I don't know the details of the arguments about Keillor, but that reply is just weird.  What Keillor stated isn't anti woman, and what we'll note below here should be obvious, Barrett is a woman.

Anyhow, at the same time, this also means that Liberals have become acclimated to an elitist view of government over the years, with the Supreme Court serving as a Platonic council of elders.  They liked the idea of the wise, symbolized by the late Justice Ginsburg, declaring things for the less benighted.  

The problem with that is that if you accept it, you have to accept it Soviet style.  I.e., if the Politburo says one day that we're friends of the Third Reich, we are, and if later it says they're our enemy, they are. No asking questions.

So you really can't ask a legislative body to appoint only benighted elders who are enemies of legislators. That makes no sense.

Indeed, in order for the Court to really work the way the left would have it work, the Court would have to be appointed by itself, something nobody is really willing to do.

Which is in part why court packing, as backed by AOC, is such a dumb idea.  Some upset Democrats would have the next Senate pack the Court.  This presumes that the next Senate will be Democratic, which is looking increasingly unlikely late in the election, but if that comes to pass, some future Republican Senate would just pack it more.  There's be no reason not to, once that was established, and at that point the Court would be nothing more than an arm of the national legislature, the very thing the left wing fears the most.  

Indeed, if it's packed, why not paced, why not pack it with jurisprudential conservatives, that would approach the law the same way that judicial liberals do.  The results of that would be to rule from the bench in a way that conservatives have never done in the U.S., but which there could easily be found people who would do.  Right now, a liberal focus is on abortion, for example.  Judicial conservatives might, at the very most, say that there's no right protecting it to be found in the Constitution, which is actually quite unlikely at this point, and send it back to the states.  But jurisprudential conservatives could take the same approach to the law that judicial liberals have and find that abortion is contrary to the natural law and therefore contrary and hence illegal due to factors that underlie the Constitution and which are beyond it.  People like AOC who would pack the Court, if they have any intellectual honesty, which is doubtful as it would require reasoning beyond politics, would have to accept that even if they are in the highly liberal camp.

In Ginsburgh, Barrett, Sasse, and Markey, we have the reflection of what we noted  yesterday. Ginsburg was a symbol of her times, and a hero of them for legitimate reasons. But those times have passed.  The geriatric nature of the national government makes this something that, for those in it, that is hard to appreciate, and the unusual domination of a single generation, the Baby Boomers, in the culture of the Western World further obfuscated it.  But the oldest departing recent Supreme Court justices, Kennedy and Ginsburg, were well past their eras when the departed the bench, one voluntarily and one through death.

In her life, Ginsburg very much reflected her times. She was a pioneer in the law and in the life of women at the time, becoming a lawyer when it was hard just for women to enter the profession, and raising two children while having a career, the oldest of which, also a lawyer, is now 65 years old herself.  She was a political liberal in a liberal era, and lead a pioneering life.

Barrett, in her 40s, is by contrast younger than both of Justice Ginsburg's children and is a pioneer in her own right, but the kind that many of the left don't care for and fear, just as in the 70s Ginsburg was the same for some on the right.  Also a career women, she is the mother of a large family of seven, for which it is always noted that two were adopted.*** She's outwardly religiously devout where as it seems Ginsburg was secular, at least to appearances.  And Ginsburg quietly endorsed an activist judicial approach which accepted, in essence, that the populace would not go where it needed to on its own and had to be lead there, while Barrett takes the approach that the populace goes where it goes, and should be restrained only where it clearly has been structurally provided that it can't go there.

That this would create fights on the left is telling.  It makes sense that justices like Ginsburg were opposed on the right, as they accepted imposing changes from above and irrespective of democratic feelings on them.  It would seem that everyone would be more tolerant of the concept of imposing changes from below, except for the basic distrust that most people don't want to go some places.

But the acceptance of the imposition of change on the left is mostly because the right has never attempted that in the United States.  It most definitely has in other countries.  Indeed, while its often argued by some that the American Revolution was a "conservative revolution", the disproof of that is that we've never really had one.  Other countries most definitely have had conservative revolutions which imposed conservative ideals from the top.  The Spanish Civil War was a species of conservative revolution in its impact, for example.  It could be likewise argued that Petain's premiership from 1940 to 1945 in France likewise was.

This is not to argue that those are really fully analogous examples, and certainly not admirable ones.  Franco and Petain were definitely anti democratic, where as the American conservatives most definitely are pro democratic.  As noted, it's ironically the American left that tends to be somewhat anti democratic with that impulse existing even somewhat in the mainstream, although recently the hard alt right has flirted with being anti democratic as well.  Rather, the point is American conservatism has always limited its efforts to argument, in the mainstream.****Indeed, American conservatives have not argued for jurisprudentially conservative justices at any point, and don't even seem to know what that would mean.

So the question now becomes, in the short term, how society might deal with increased legislative activity being licensed and licensed at the local level, something that reverses a 90 year trend.  And the added question is how American liberalism, which even in conservative administrations has basically been either been in the driver's seat or right besides the driver with a hand on the wheel, reacts when this is no longer true.  Conservatives in most places are used to the idea of being "strangers in a strange land", i.e., at least somewhat outside of their own societies.  Liberals are not.

Added to that we're just beginning to see the very first reactions of the Cosmo Girl meeting the Twitter Girl.  That may seem to be superficial, but seeing what's gong on out there shows its not.  One hip, young, cool female Twitter figure defines herself as:
real. raw. bold. brave. Marian devotion to apocalyptic proportions. in the pursuit of corn juice.
No hip, cool, Boomer, when young, or ever, defined herself that way.

Changings of the guard are only smooth transitions in organizations that are designed for that.  Cultures, don't design for that.  And as we've noted before, cultures are sticky, yet plastic.  The times, turly, are a changin'

___________________________________________________________________________________


*Markey's South Boston unit contained at least two other then young future notable political figures and his two brothers.  Service in the Guard and Reserve was an honorable Vietnam War option and I'm not claiming the opposite.

**One of the weird ironies of the Me Too movement is that men should have been acting like Christian gentlemen, even though the movement has been grounded in a camp and industry that declared its animosity towards Christian values eons ago.  

This doesn't endorse male wolfish behavior, but so far none of the real backers of the movement have been able to state why men shouldn't act the way that they've been complaining about, even though everyone knows why they shouldn't.  Be that as it may, a society that was raised on a diet of the evolved products of Playboy and Cosmopolitan has taught the very horrific lessons that brought about the behavior now complained of.  In seeking to revive the old standard, in the guise of it being the new woke one, some argument has to be created to back it.  Just "you shouldn't" is an anemic argument and fails on its face.  Nobody makes the argument, however, as "you shouldn't" as it wrong, and its wrong because. . . well nobody wants to go there and discuss what else might be wrong.

***She was oddly accused of racism for adopting orphans from Haiti and criticized simply for having a large family, the latter an example of prejudice of varying types, some religious, but some generational.  The new woman, as viewed from the 60s and 70s, isn't supposed to have a large family.  The problem is, that some of the younger ones now do, as we noted yesterday.

****In the American South, however, this isn't always true by any means.  And there's no denying that Southern conservatism backed racism and went beyond arguments to back it.